SD205 (switch) and VLAN

Similar Questions

• Existing vSwitch using and VLAN

  Hello

  I was wondering if it was possible to configure Lab Manager to use an existing vSwitch and VLANS configured in vCenter rather than create its own switch and VLAN?

  Thank you.

  Unfortunately not.  You will need to let LM create and manage their own groups of ports or switches.

  Note that:

  -When you bind a physical network to a vSwitch/vDS, LM creates a port group to represent the network (it also has an 'LM' tag in vCenter)

  -If you deploy a configuration "reserved", he made a vSwitch or vDS port group to represent the fence... and limit network traffic.  Again, when you look in vCenter, there should be an 'LM' tag to the object.

  Kind regards

  Jon Hemming, b.SC., RHCT, VMware vExpert 2009
  http://Twitter.com/vJonHemming

  If your question or problem has been resolved, please click the "right answer".  If someone helped him, please click "useful answer.

• Subinterfaces and VLAN

  Hi all

  I was hired on with a State... Now its been awhile, but I do not remember how subinterfaces and VLAN all link together!

  Now correct me where I'm wrong (please), but them VLAN is created on the correct first switches?  When you create a VLAN on a switch you don't need ip or gateway address by default because them VLANS are the switch.  If you want intervlan routing you need a router.  Then, you configure a port trunking between the switch and router (ISL, 802. 1 q).  Now in the router, you can create a VLAN, and here you inter the ip subnet or the default gateway addresses correct?  This is where I get confused as to what reasons do you need subinterfaces?  How they roped VLAN and what would be the logical flow of data?

  Anyhelp would be appreciated!

  Yes you are right. If you are using the layer 2 switch and want to make the intervlan Routing then you need Layer 3 router device. But you must configure the interfaces sub with the default gateway to route traffic. Because there is a single trunk between swich and router so we need sup interfaces for multiple VLANs.

  Interface FastEthernet0/0.1

  Encapsulation dot1q 10 (10 represent 10 ID VLAN)

  10.1.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  If you use a layer 3 switch, then you point all sub interfaces need so then you can create the interface vlan with the default gateway. You must enable ip Routing.

  Interface vlan 10

  10.1.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  Hope this will help.

  Please rate if this can help.

  Thank you

• VPN and VLAN

  We have a site divided into 2 IEE802.1Q VLAN, using no switches Cisco. They have a PIX515 for Internet access. It is also configured to provide inbound VPN access for management and general purpose of access.

  In principle it is possible to set up a new VPN connection which is reflected by its interior traffic be tagged with a specific VLAN ID while all other traffic (including other VPN connections) remain without a label?

  If the PIX ends your VPN from the outside that the answer is no. If the VPN is coming from outside, and ending at the PIX she never travels a VLAN. VLAN tagging is used to identify what VLAN came from a source image and what VLAN it is intended for a current switch vlan can 'route' frame through the appropriate VIRTUAL LAN. Why you want to tag from outside VPN traffic? If it's to control access, you can specify 2 VLANS and VLAN 3 on the PIX (as long as it has code 6.3) and control what VLAN, you want that each group VPN access to through the use of the ACL. Each VLAN on a PIX is treated as a physical interface. It has its own security prefs (0-100) and can have ACL applied to them as well as the physical interfaces.

• Cisco SG500 and VLAN

  OK so here is what I try to accomplish with 3 switch Cisco SG500-52. I created 4 VLANS on a SG500 I call my central office switch and it is set in routing mode. My VLAN is thus 400 (Infrastructure ESXI hosts, firewall, etc.), 401 (VoIP), 402 (users) and 403 (wireless). I have configured interfaces and the delivery without problem for me through my subnets and the communities of remote access through 3 offices.

  Where I'm not sure is on the SG500 I set as a L2 switch and my ESXi host are connected (I have 10 ports on one VLAN remote iSCSI traffic) is that I have to create VLAN 400 and mark those ports not marked? So should I use 1-2 ports and set them as ports and tag to my main switch 400?

  In the affirmative on the main switch I create junction ports and mark for the VLAN on the switch that could access the L2 switch? Is this also the case for the other SG500 I have who are all devices for 402 VLAN?

  I'm overloading it?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Hi Sdonnelly2,

  For vlan 402 and 400 on the uplink to your sg500 (L2) would be 400U and 402 T.

  Other interfaces for VoIP phones on vlan 401 would be configured to 401 T. This is if your phones expect traffic labeled, otherwise they would be configured to 401U.

  For Vlan 402 other interfaces would still be 402U. PC only contacted untagged traffic

  For 403 Vlan wireless uplink access point must be configured (400U, 401, 402, 403T)

  It is perhaps more information than expected, but I hope that I have answered other questions you had.

• No "ip Routing" command on the switch and still intervlan routing.

  Hello

  In my companies 4500 switch I see there is intervlan routing configured for 4 VLANS there but I don't see any command "ip Routing" on this subject

  to enable routing on the switch. A switch can route the same if the command is not there?

  Ninja,

  Default configuration options often do not appear in "show run".  Please try «performance see all»

  Kind regards

  Christopher

  PS your switch and device business, not small business.

• Make two cheating SG200 four switches with vlan

  Hello

  I have two switches SG200 I want to divide it into 2 VLANS totally independent.

  My guess is that I could create a VLAN #2 and then assign 1-24 of VLAN (default) #1 and ports 25-48 of VLAN #2.

  Do the same with the second switch.

  And finally connect the cable from the port 1 switch 1 to port 1 of the 2 switch and

  another cable to port 25 on switch 1 to port 25 on switch 2.

  For some reason, devices can bee 'ping' on the same ports vlan switch 1 but cannot reach the devices on the switch 2.

  Is there a way to do this with SG200 switches?

  Thank you

  It is a valid topology.

  Any individual connection to the router should be UNTAG vlan 1 and vlan 2 UNTAG.

  Any connection host for the vlan 1 should be vlan 1 UNTAG, any connection host in vlan 2 should be vlan 2 UNTAG. Marking only that we care is between the switches, 1u, 2 t trunk. Everything else is respectively not marked.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Create 2 VLAN (VLAN 1 and VLAN 2)

  Hi all

  I need help and advice with my new Cisco SF300-48. I want to create 2 vlan (vlan 1 and vlan 2). The switch is set at layer 2.

  example:

  VLAN 1 (port 1, 2, 3), vlan 2 (port 4, 5, 6)

  VLAN 1 can communicate with each other (port 1, 2, 3) and vlan 2 can communicate with each other (port 4, 5, 6)

  But vlan 1 cannot communicate with vlan 2.

  Any help would be appreciated

  Thank you

  Johan

  Well, as far as I understand the message communication between the VLAN is not necessary. The thing is, that all ports LAN VIRTUAL (for example VLAN 1 with ports 1, 2, and 3) cannot communicate with each other. Did you check the configuration of the port / VLAN (VLAN configured to each port configuration right / right about the tag-no identified)?

• Use HREAP SSID and vLAN

  Hello

  I have currently a small deployment wireless using LWAPP 1141 against WISN controllers. The controller is configured with a SSID against a dynamic interface.

  For the mobility of the user, the company wants to use one SSID for the movement of personnel between offices

  New Office Online to use 3502 configured as of HREAP and local CAPWAPs to next mode switching.

  My understanding is that the CAPWAPs require a virtual interface on the controller to CAPWAP > traffic controller. Requires a dynamic interface for users of the site of HREAP setting on the controller? If this is not the case, how an SSID on the controller are mapped to the vLAN on the remote site?

  Thank you

  David,

  No problem, so review your comments below really all what you need to do is the following.

  Once the SSID is set to H-HARVEST of local switching, and the AP is set in Mode H-REAP follow these steps:

  -Under AP Configuration click the H-REAP tab and activate the socket supported VLAN

  -The value VLAN native 797 and click on apply

  -Under AP Configuration click the H-REAP tab click on mappings of VLAN

  -Enter the respective VLAN for the SSID is shown if they are different from

  -On the remote switch port Configuration of AP as a port Trunk just like you did with the WLC port (797 of VLANs allowed native and 301.)

  The Group REAP H is more important if your use 802. 1 x or authentication EAP type where a radius server is used. You can create a Group H-HARVEST to implement if you want even if you do not use this authentication method.  In regards to the WLC knows it remote. I don't think he cares.

  You can see examples of my 3 screen shots attached.

  I hope this helps... Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Thank you

  Kayle

• Management and Vlan native in different subnet?

  Can I have a management ip and vlan native in a different on AIR-1242 switch subnet and 2960?

  Native on switch = 1.

  The interface vlan 100 = 10.10.1.25X 24

  BVI ip to the vlan 100 = 10.10.1.25X 24

  -HM-

  Hello

  As far as I know, the management and the native will be the same... I guess... You have Vlan native as 1 on the switch and Int Vlan 100 on routing switch? Am I wrong? Let me know what are your needs... which will help me to help out you!

  for your question...

  Normally, we specify him vlan native on the switch and the AP so that communication happens... communication won't happen if there is a match of...

  Looking forward to hear from you!

  Let me know if that answers your question...

  Concerning
  Surendra
  ====
  Please do not forget to note positions that answered your question and mark as answer or was useful

• Make a little a bood by setting the switch 1 VLAN other than ALL - lost to ESXi management

  Hi all

  As the title says, I mucked this up a little bit. I have two virtual switches configured, one with all my virtual machines on three cards attached network, and the other with the management and interface card NETWORK attached.

  I thought that I have would combine the lot in a single switch and have the cards connected to the simple switch. Everything is VLAN'ed switch0 was set up at the trunk all the VLANS, as was the segment of management - although this should be in one VLAN specific. I've updated the Switch0 simply use the VLAN segment management and connectivity quickly lost the device to ESXi. All virtual machines on their VLAN specific are OK on the second switch.

  How can I return a network access ESXi?

  Console access is available, but I seem to have lost Out Light control will have to physically go to the machine.

  What a prick!

  Chris

  Couple of questions to understand the actions performed by you:

  I've updated the Switch0 simply use the VLAN management segment, and quickly lost connectivity to the device ESXi--> do you mean WHAT VLAN ID changed to 18 0 (none)?

  

  The virtual switch was set to pass all THE VLAN the Port VMkernal (Management Network Group) has been updated with "All THE VLAN", I went it to the VLAN (18)-->, you gave VLAN ID as 18 and your single NIC - VMNIC 0 is interconnection to VLAN 18?

  In simple words - you physical NIC 0 visibility to VLAN 18 or not (you will have to ask Admin network) - double else check your wiring asks that you made at the time of Installation

  For this kind of connectivity issues - you need problems like RSA/ILO/DRAC remote console based on the style of the material.

• With the help of VLANS and VLAN Tagging is not working / no connection

  Hello

  I m trying to configure a VLAN between some virtual machines on ESX host 3.

  I want to do this way:

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1004074

  I got 1 dedicated NETWORK adapter to each ESX host that is connected to a dvSwitch in which I configured a portgroup

  with VLAN ID 2121. I have configured each virtual machine to use this network.

  When I put the virtual machines on a single host, they are able to communicate.

  When they are placed on different hosts they are (if the VIRTUAL LAN is enabled on portgroup) not able to communicate.

  So I m assuming it must be a problem in the config NIC on the ESX host or switch.

  I m using a HP2910AL on which I activated mode trunk for each port that is connected to a NETWORK card with

  the dvSwitch/Portgroup I try to use for the vlan. In the hp switch, I have a default VLAN with ID 1 where

  the Ports are marked not signposted. I install a second VLAN on the switch with ID 2121 in which I scored

  This tag ports.

  Is there something else to do - perhaps side ESX host?

  I tried changing the settings as "forged transmission-> allow ' on portgroup and I found other things

  in the web, but always without success.

  Kind regards

  Patrick

  Were you referred to this guide? :

  http://CDN.ProCurve.com/training/manuals/2910-ATG-Feb09-2-VLAN.PDF

  "show vlan ports" would be my next check to make sure that you have connected to your ESXi host 3 ports in the vlan 2121.

  As Duncan has said if you have a VLAN ID on the portgroup in the vSwitch and you have the port on the pSwitch as trunk not acess and VLAN ID is allowed on the trunk port pSwitch you should be ok.  Just to clarify the trunk is 802. 1 q No 802.3ad.

  The reverse is not VLAN ID on the portgroup vSwitch, use coelio on pSwitch with VLAN ID.  Limited pSwitch port to a VLAN, this may be ok for you?

• VLAN Tagging (VST) and VLAN native on the same vswitch

  I'm trying to figure out if its possible to put running the VLAN tagging for a vswitch if our virtual machines are currently in the vlan 1 (vlan native) on our cisco switches. I don't know why it's set up this way, but change is not an option at this time.

  Ultimately what I'm trying to accomplish is setting up a group of servers that differ on one VLAN, but under the same vswitch. I'm assuming that VST is what I need, but I don't know if I can simply specify how vlan 1 as the vlan 1 is not marked on cisco switches and my understanding is that VST requires to carry a label.

  Your help is greatly appreciated.

  NuRD.

  With the vSwitch connected to a trunk on the physical switch port, create the port groups and you need only configure the ID then VLAN for the port groups that do not use of VLAN native. See for example http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1004074

  André

• v switches and sbs

  I'm going to migrate a small sbs environment. 1 new SBSServer and maybe 2 applicationservers.

  I don't need a management switch. But what of the rest; should I put all servres on 1 switch or should I split? And what about the connection to the storage? the storage is going to be iscsi; I need to create a v-scwitch for iscsi as well?

  You can use a simple switch and make sure that Vswitch port are correctly configures the VLAN/Trunk/coelio.

• Configurations of VMotion and VLAN

  Configurations of VMotion and VLAN

  ESXi 4.0 / 4.0 vCenter

  Can someone explain how to configure the ports VMotion using VIRTUAL LANs.

  Here's the design;

  Two network adapters for teaming on a virtual standard switch 0

  A network for management and another network for VMotion traffic

  The ports management group is on VLAN 103 and its default gateway is set to the network VLAN 103

  When I add a for VMotion VMkernel port group and configure the network, and I use the gateway of 103 VLAN by default I can't vmkping the other interfaces for VMotion similar configuration.

  If I change the default gateway settings and use VMotion gateway, then bad things happen, i.e. lose connectivity to the service console.

  Thanks,-Jeff

  Both an eon of ar sthjey the same physical segment (i.e., the plughed in the same physical switch) there will be no need for a gateway for the vmotion network address.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful