24mm 1.4 vs 35mm 1.4 CROP

Similar Questions

• Harvest, CS5, in any case to again crop ratio 35mm?

  I learned years ago to trim a ratio of 35 mm using the marquee tool.

  It's sad, because it would be awkward to do with the marked. Photoshop has already installed a way to do that with the crop tool yet? Thank you.

  So, what is the advantage of using the crop tool on the text selection tool scrolling?  The crop tool is easier to move and it is possible to resize all the while remaining active.  That's all.

  It works very well.

• If 35mm on a full frame is normal. 20 mm on a crop would be normal? you know 35mm ÷ 1.6 = 21?

  70 D

  N ° 50 mm is considered Normal on full frame & MULTIPLY you, not broken when it comes to culture organs so 30 mm X 1.6 = 48 mm effectively.

• Crop Factor, the size of the sensor, field of vision

  I find all of it. a but confusing when many call of cameras themselves as full frame, but when you put the same lens on different cameras, the frame is different.. crop factor. field of vision... different .but
  So what crop factor... is the f55 sony please? I've seen a number of different things on various forums not suggesting no harvest to 1.3 but you see the Abel cine graphic field and the f55 is cropped than a c300, which is 1.6. .some how I thought that we were heading toward a world where 50mm meant 50 mm...

  This becomes particularly relevant by using the lens wide angle. When you use the tokina 11-16 (I think only accepted the wider for those who have no characteristic budget) on one of these cameras, the crop or field of view factor restricted means that you have nowhere near frame... a 1.6 crop what goal can give you the grand scale?

  So what is the truth about the f55... Please thank you...

  So, from what I can tell with the F55...

  Sensor is 24 x 12.7 mm with a diagonal of 27.1 mm

  By comparison, when you work with a negative S35 (1.85, 2.40, 1.78) will all use the same horizontal dimensions for the extraction of the negative. What is happening at 24mm (through the book of ARRI frosted glass dimensions). So what this tells us, it's that your lenses will have the same field of view HORIZONTAL on the F55 as they would a film camera. So a 50mm should have the same field of view HORIZONTAL as a film S35mm camera.

  Even a 3perf S35 cameras extraction rates from the exposed negative will be 23,11 mm, slightly more small, but with regard to the horizontal field of vision, people aren't saying that their 50 isn't a 50 because we turn 3perf vs 4perf.

  Now, using the diagonal, show us the lens cover. Yes, the sensor has the same height as a negative film, so if a lens covers the sensor or will not play with the diagonal. And to also know the lens image circle. I can't find what the image circle is for this device, kind of coverage I can't tell you.

  What I see, is that it was designed for the size of APS - C sensor cameras that, on average, would be a 25.1 x 16.7 mm (all manufactured products have different dimensions some small some bigger ones, that it is supposed to use on average). So a device to sensor APS - C on AVERAGE, a bit of a wider horizontal field of view you. The diagonal of 30.1 mm makes me believe that you should have a cover and that he should not thumbnail, although the difference in horizontal makes me think that it might be a very slight decline offshore on the corners.

  Something to remember... well that this objective was intended for 35mm film, in the world of images is fixed. S35mm film in the film world is different. So when a film camera say it's Full Frame, it is in relation to a negative S35, not a camera negative. So with a film lens, a 50mm would mean a 50mm, but when you start to move the lenses of disciplines, that's when things start to become difficult.

  And please keep in mind, that's how I know. I'm not saying this is 100% the perfect answer, it's just what I saw, what I heard and what tells me the calculation.

• [Beginner] How you view focal length of 35mm EQ. ?

  How yo view focal length in 35mm equivalent?

  I found a plugin which sorts the photos in eq. 35mm, but I'm looking for a medium/plug-in that displays focal length in eq. 35 mm in the info of the loop.

  Any other editor of PP I have used in the past were less than LR, but always had the ability to view the focal length in 35mm. I wonder why LR, a far superior tool, is lacking in this Department. Since I still have to learn photography and use the 2 systems of interchangeable lens camera with factors of different cultures and although two compact cameras, through my pictures with the focal length in mind really allows me to get a better understanding of the perspective.

  This plugin can do what you want, but read on:

  http://regex.info/blog/Lightroom-goodies/focal-length-sort

  More than 35 years ago, I bought my first 35 mm SLR film camera and a bunch of privileged (i.e. objectives to single focal length) lenses. I walked with three 3 boxes, each fitted with one (1) 'main' focal lens and a camera with three or more lens bag. Fortunately, the equipment of series Olympus OM I used was extremely, compact and light weight, even by today's standards.

  With ranges of today zoom lens you can cover most tire using only two lenses.

  To "learn the purpose" why not create a spreadsheet containing a list of focal lengths of 35mm (14mm, 16mm, 17mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, etc.) and add a column for each camera with its equivalent focal length model.

  You can then create a group of collections of LR based on the length focus groups for purposes of comparison:

  1.x Crop camera 1 1.x Crop camera 35mm 2

  super wide 14-20mm

  width 21mm - 35 mm

  normal 36mm - 69 mm

  70-299mm telephoto

  Super Telephoto 300mm and more

  Add images from one camera at a time by using the sort column filter bar "Lens" and your impression dandy new handy focal distance calculator spreadsheet.

  It will give you a much better appreciation of what your current hardware can and cannot do. And despite what says Web Weaver, you will never be able to take a picture like that with a 50mm lens:

  

• Format of the crop sensor / subject remotely / calibration full AOV equivalent framework

  While using the crop sensor format, how can we adjust the distance of subjects to have the same field of view (AOV) in return, full frame, assuming that the current focal length in use has already been evaluated in order to take into account the standard of 35 mm film? I have the EOS Rebel SL1.

  character_stops wrote:

  Yes. I'm sure that the camera I have is the smallest format. That's why I think I need to experiment with several lenses to see how everyone reacts. I think that the format of my camera is 2 x 3, but I'm not completely sure.  After my image size more great cameras in Ps, I chose a preset of the photo, and it converted to 2 x 3 inches. Would this mean a culture factor much more than 7.5?

  Do not confuse "cropping" in Photoshop with the "culture lens/sensor factors" for your camera.

  Photoshop (and many other software image) have a number of current relationships preset image for purposes of culture aspectg. Choice 2:3 in Photoshop will make the area of the whole image that is produced by your camera. Then, you can resize a number of common paper sizes... 4 x 6 inches, 6 x 9, 8 x 12 inch and 12 x 18 (or 13 x 19) inch... that all share the same images of proportions.

  If you choose rather the proportions 4:5 in the truncation of software tool, some of the longest axis of the image will be deleted off the coast, but you can then resize the image to fit other common paper sizes such as 4 "x 5", 8 x 10 inch, 16 x 20 inches.

  There are also a few formats of common paper who don't exactly conform to one pre-defined aspect ratios, for example 5 x 7 inch and 11 x 14 inches. These are somewhere between the two.

  Your camera has a ratio of 2:3 (not 2 x 3). This has been fairly uniform among the 35mm film SLRs and was postponed to digital, too (for the large part... There are a few exceptions). The actual size of your camera sensor is approximately 15x22mm. The so-called "full frame" cameras also have a 2:3 format... is about the actual size of their 24x36mm sensor.

  In other words, the same proportion (IE ' side short vs long side ") is possible in different sizes (both in the sensor format or the movie... and printing of paper sizes). Don't worry too much on this subject the reference to large format... Which seemed to have been mentioned just to demonstrate that there are all kinds of "lens factors" that you can get caught up in the calculation, but this does not really much.

  Focal length does not change. 50mm is 50mm no matter what.

  But a 50mm lens on a format behaves differently than it does on another format. On your camera with sensor 15x22mm is a 50mm focal length lens acts as a nice "short telephoto.  Put the same focal exact on a digital point-n-shoot which has a very small sensor and it can behave as a very powerful, long telephoto.  If not, put this same 50mm on a digital camera to 'full frame' and it will act as a 'standard' lens (that is, not wide or Telephoto). Or, put this same 50mm on a camera film of medium format, which has an image 60x70mm area and this will be a lens wide angle. Finally, put it on a film camera of large format as a 4 x 5 (... equal to approximately 100x125mm inches) and the same focal length of 50 mm behaves like an extreme wide-angle.

  You say you have a kit lens... I guess it's a zoom. Probably an EF-S 18-55mm lens and an EF-S 18-135mm lens. You also have a 50mm 'first' (not a zoom) EF lens. If you set the zoom EF-S 50mm it will give exactly the same angle of view as the lens EF 50 mm Prime. The only difference is that the EF-S lens is specifically designed for smaller sensor cameras, while the EF lens is designed to give an image circle large enough to cover the area from a towards full frame camera.

  Yes, it is true, because they do not need to produce as big a circle frame EF-S or "cultures only" lenses designed for use on small photo sensor can be smaller in size, lighter and less expensive than the lenses made to cover the full frame sensor image area.

  If your kit lens is a 18-55mm, on your camera that provides a variable angle of view ranging from the wide-angle moderate standard to short telephoto. If it's a 18-135mm kit lens, which gives a little wider TV, a moderate telephoto.

  I hope that makes sense!

• Possible to crop with your home, HD video editing software? (HD-> SD size)

  Hi, using first Elements 7 on Windows XP on Windows 7.

  I wonder if it is possible to get a pan and the analysis of the process with our HD video? I ask because someone gave me some pictures of the weekend where the composition was much too broad and big, and I would like to record video, consisting of best, a quality of SD.

  Given the resolution in pixels, that it should be possible. I know it's how they convert 35mm film to fit TV, but when it comes to video, first make?

  I can crop video in first but it will save the video to the same resolution, but all pixelated and looking wobbly. How do I record video 1080i pan and scanned to 720 (p) or SD (640) regular, who always will look decent on Youtube.

  Here is an example (note, I shook as 97% first images horizontally)

  

  Can someone give a tutorial?

  Thank you

  If it's video hi-def, you can import the video into a project set up for DV standard.

  Before getting the media allows you to get the video, go to Edition/Preferences and uncheck scale to the size of the image.

  When you place your video on the timeline, it will be much larger than the screen, and you will see only a part of it. You should be able to use crops and scale to get everything you need and still have plenty of pixels to spare. (And don't forget to press ENTER to make the video before you judge its quality.)

  Note that, depending on what video format is your original footage, you may need to work with interlacing may reverse the dominant field. So I would do a short test run and output to see what it looks like before I got it in an album project.

• How to paste properly attributes for crops?

  Hello, I have problems with the function of paste attributes. Below you can see how I cropped these images. I want to paste in another clip culture settings, so that they have identical cropping. The two clips are of the same size - they are just registered my iPhone screen captures.

  In the another screenshot, you'll see what happens when I copy this element, then to paste attributes and select "crop." In the screenshot below, you will see how looks the handlebar of the Blue Harvest. I tried to adjust the trim, but all this seems to do is to take away the cropping.

  Any help is appreciated!

  

  

  

  Normally, you copy the required item.

  Then use Paste attributes:

  

  This is evident:

  

  Select the required attributes and glue.

  If that's what you already do, then check them in Spacial parameters are consistent:

  

  Al

• Lift and stamp of exposure, but not cropping

  I would like to stamp exhibition, but it seems that it also marks the cropping and it cannot be disabled.  Am I missing something, or is there a way to simply remove the selected settings.  The box seems to apply to everything under the "adjustments" section.

  Cartoonguy wrote:

  I would like to stamp exhibition, but it seems that it also marks the cropping and it cannot be disabled.  Am I missing something, or is there a way to simply remove the selected settings.  The box seems to apply to everything under the "adjustments" section.

  Just in case where you can't find this now - the answer is a little late, I know

  In the lift & Stamp HUD, you can remove items, not just disable them.

  First raise the data of the selected image. In the lift & Stamp HUD click the Basel to the right of the "adjustments", then select "Crop" and use the delete key to remove the culture of fundraising points.

  Just delete the full entry using the delete key.

  

• Can't crop my photos on 5 in iOS 9.3.4.

  I can't crop my photos on 5 s after I have updated to iOS 9.3.4

  Do you mean that your not able to find the option to harvest after your update?

• 10.1.2 crop tool does not work

  10.1.2 iMovie... I am not able to move the crop selection box to create a culture. I get yellow guidelines that appear when I move the mouse as to create a culture with the selection box. It makes me mental. until I updated it worked fine. I tried to change my preferences (adjustment, crop to fill) and we tried to select as well in my area of media and chronology. Help, please.

  The cross in the center of the collection area allows to position the crop area. The yellow lines indicate the center of the frame. Enter the corners highlighted the culture box and drag to resize the area of culture. Use the culture to fill the selection to your cropping.

• How can I stop iMovie automatically crop my picture?

  I make an invitation left in iMovie, a single pdf file, set to music.  iMovie has automatically "cropped" my pdf, slowly zooming in on the center of the image, which means that I lose the information around the edges.  How do I stop iMovie automatically crop and zoom - I want just the full-size PDF to show?

  Looks like you have the ken burns effect turned on. Select your pdf file and click the crop button in the toolbar. Then select adjustment and you should be fine.

• Lightroom photogalleries in cropped in Firefox.

  I created a number of galleries with LR and then introduced into existing web pages in my web site. While the galleries work fine in Chrome and IE, there is a problem with the Firefox browser. The photos show but during the expansion of the photo it's cropped and so that part of it is shown. I tried inserting the image using the two an Iframe and as an object/embed, same result, fine in Chrome and IE but each photo cropped in Firefox.

  Any solution to this?

  The embedded page uses certain rules of style to override the behavior of the normal display. Probably there are aesthetic reasons, why I'm not aware of, but cumulatively, they cause the div elements around the image to ignore the setting of width of 100%.

  (1) #loupeContainer div.image - container {display: table}

  The tables are inherently extensible and will be expanded to fit their content despite a width: 100% except if this rule is also defined:

  table-layout:fixed
  

  (2) #loupeContainer div.image - container div.image {display: table-cell}

  Same as #1, but the fixed rule must be on the item display: table.

  (3) #loupeContainer div.corners {display: inline-block}

  The image is not reduced to adjust when it becomes the default display of the inline-block block

  What intrigues me is that it works outside the iframe, i.e. autonomous open in a separate tab. I think my only solution would be to shorten the height of the iframe is more than a form of 4:3 as a form of 1:1.

• Cropping for a 4K TV?

  With my 1080 p TV I crop the pictures at 1920 x 1080 so that they appear correctly on the TV. How should I culture pictures that will appear on a 4K TV? I am currently cropping photos that appear on a 1080 p TV and a 4 K TV. Is there a size that works for both of them?

  Thank you.

  4 k is simply double 1080 p. Up to 3840 x 2160.

  If your pictures are not that great, then 1080 p still works on a 4K just TV very well.

• In Final Cut Pro, Ken Burns my button does not appear when I click on CROPS

  I try to use the Ken Burns effect to a clip in Final Cut Pro. Tutorials tell me to click the CROP after selecting my clip. I've done several times and the button of Ken Burns is supposed to happen. This isn't. Can anyone help?

  What version do you use? Click on the popup at the bottom right of the Viewer to select trim, and post a screenshot of the Viewer.