4402 WLC and WCS

Hi all

We have 3 WLC 4402 all with identical config and we use Lobby Admin to create guest accounts.

Problem with this is that the guest account must be created on 3 WLC.

I installation WCS and want to know how to extract the 3 existing wlc and their config in the WCS.

Can the admin of lobbay can create accounts on the WCS and grow them into all wlc

Hi RR,.

>I install WCS and want to know how to extract the 3 existing wlc and their config in the WCS.

It's pretty easy. You must add a new controller via the configuration-> page controllers. The option 'Add the new controller' is in the drop-down list at the top right of the screen. You can use a list separated by commas of IP addresses to add all three at the same time. WCS audit of the controller software and get to the bottom of the config.

>Also can the admin Hall can create accounts on the WCS and grow them into all wlc

I have not used the account Admin Hall (it is not really appropriate in the office where I work), but I know that you can create a guest account in the controller model launch pad. It is under Security in the sidebar. This model can then be applied to all three WLCs at the same time, that will simplify things. I guess you would need to make sure that your Hall administrator can access this particular part of the WCS.

Hope that helps.

-Jason

Tags: Cisco Wireless

Similar Questions

  • 802.11 n WISN and WCS support

    That is the new wless 802.11n standard is current cargo support Cisco WLC 44XX and WISN (6500 wireless controller card)?

    Also, I need to know if is is supported in the WCS 4.1?

    Hi Pierre,.

    Yes, 802.11n is supported on the WISN and WCS with the following versions of the 4.2 train;

    Release notes for the controllers wireless LAN Cisco and Points of light access for version 4.2.61.0

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn4200.html#wp302677

    The following new features are available in the 4.2.62.0 WCS

    802.11n support - the introduction of the series access Cisco Aironet 1250 point, access of the class point business based on the IEEE 802.11n standard some 2.0 standard. The access point provides combined data rates of up to 600 Mbit/s to meet the bandwidth needs. Cisco WCS displays include a list for configuration, management and monitoring 802.11n access points and their associated wireless LAN controllers.

    The new trains WLC and WCS 5.0 are now released as well :)

    I hope this helps!

    Rob

  • 4402 controller and Microsoft IAS

    We have recently installed a 4402 WLC and all our standalone AP improved to of LWAPP. Each of the previous AP had an entry in IAS Radius. Can they be deleted without IAS problem now? As far as I can see IAS logs all authentication requests are received from the WLC only.

    If I remove them, it will allow me to add other Cisco devices in IAS since Microsoft sets a limit of 50 customers.

    I was not able to find a definitive answer to this in the documentation.

    I have no connection to this, but yes, you can remove your Radius server's individual access points.

    Authentication is now managed by the WLC and IAS Radius.

    HTH

    Steve

  • WLC, WCS and WCS Navigator

    I would like to know what is the difference between wireless Lan controller and controller wireless system.

    I need WLC if I want to deploy WCS.

    Can I use WCS without wireless LAN controllers?

    What is the diference between WCS and WCS Navigator?

    And just to add WCS navigator is used to group multiple instances of WCS. This would serve in a very large deployment (in thousands of controllers).

    -Mike

    http://CS-Mars.blogspot.com

  • WLSE and WCS

    Help!

    I intend implementation of 10-15 s AP in my company. I don't need a lot, but I want a ssid and the ability to walk between access points without losing the connection. The cost is a little problem as well. In my view, there is an area called 2.13 to express the Cisco Wireless LAN Solution. Now this box as terribly cheap. Makes me wonder. Every time I thought a lot about this, I so with the price of the WCS of 25 reviews 4400, 7 times the price upward. Now, I've been Googling my fingers numb, but I can't really know what is distinguished by a wcs and wlse solution. Can I use this box of Cisco Wireless LAN Solution Express 2.13 at little cost only a PoE switch and some radio stations? Or do I have as well a 6500 with a controller wlse switch? because then; the 4400 would be cheaper.

    Appreciate the help,

    \\mark

    Hi Mark,

    This is a big topic of discussion! Haha, I hope I can help with some basic information. The two solutions as you watch (WLSE vs WLC/WISN/WCS) are for two different architectures wireless. The WLSE is for 'stand-alone' access points, and the WISN/WLC/WCS are all for "lightweight" access points

    The fundamental difference between the two is that autonomous architecture is a distributed design, while the lightweights are centralized. Here are some details:

    AUTONOMOUS

    Each access point runs any himself. It must be set up individually for all SSID and VLAN. A WLSE device can be used to manage multiple APs via SNMP, but it's a manual process. A WLSE can also help the management of radio, as the channel design, but it is still a very manual process.

    LIGHT WEIGHT

    Access points are not individually configured. They must join a wireless LAN (WLC) controller to operate. They can find the controller automatically, and when they do they download a configuration. They work with the help of the controller. The controller takes the information of all the APs and adjusts dynamically the channels and power radio as needed to optimize the network. The WLC is the only device that you need to manage since it manages all the APs for you.

    It's a view VERY high level of the two models. Long story short, stand-alone solutions require usually more work to manage, and lightweight demand less. You are just looking to run 10-15 access points, so a light solution probably won't pay off as it would if you were installing 100 +. This does not mean that you don't have light, but it might not be useful the extra cost.

    Once again, very complicated subject and I hope that gives you a better understanding that will help you when Googling. Try Googling light autonomous vs, you'll find some good articles.

  • unloading of feature to make dhcp off the WLC and put it on Active Directory.

    I need to use the feature of unloading to dhcp off the WLC and put it on Active Directory.  Someone at - it a walkthrough or a page for this?  I know it's just a checkbox and a redirect to the new dhcp server, but where the hell is the configuration on the WLC?

    Thank you!

    -anne

    You can go there.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/wireless/controller/7-4/configuration/guides/consolidated/b_cg74_CONSOLIDATED/b_cg74_CONSOLIDATED_chapter_01001001.html

    Point to your existing ad integrated DHCP server.

  • Cisco WLC and Apple TV Hello

    Hello

    I followed the guide on http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/bonjour/7.5/Bonjour_Gateway_Phase-2_WLC_software_release_7.5.html on activation of Cisco WLC 7.5 with Apple TV good morning however I have a weird problem. I have some clients unable to see the apple TV connected to a different wireless access point while some may see the Apple connected TVs. I have attached my setup for reference. I would like to inquire about the use of LSS and so perhaps someone has encountered similar problems? The apple TV is discovered by the wlc on mdns-domain names.

    According to the document, multicast has been activated not however the discovery of the apple tv is intermittent of apple customers. Customer can discover apple tv 1 and 3 but not apple tv 2 and sometimes it can discover all 3 apple TV while client B is able to perceive all apple TV devices 3. All 3 apple TV devices are discovered by WLC and only apple TV service has been activated on WLC.  I was wondering if anyone has seen a similar question? Not too sure what can be the cause of it?

    Any suggestion is appreciated.

    Some of the docs didn't do it, but it is required as all my installation requiring Hello, set multicast implementation.

    Thank you

    Scott

    Help others using the system of rating and marking answers questions like "answered."

  • management of WCS, WLC and H-REAP AP1242

    We have chosen to deploy 1 wlc2106(k9-7-0-98-0) and 4 or 5 APs 1242, LAP - AIR and AIR - AP converted to AIR TOURS in each office, with a backup 1 WLC5500, in seat.

    We have WCS (v7.0) and in this architecture, 1242 APs will be always connected on 1 of 2 WLC (never in autonomous REAP).

    In normal mode, WLAN, working in the central authentication and Central switch. In backup mode, WLAN work in central authentication (backup WLC headquarters) and local switching.

    For the configuration of the WLC, is it really necessary to create and REAP H unit for all the Aps or can I leave by default-AP group?

    I have a problem with AIR - AP converted it TURN: I can't push a TOUR from the WCS model:

    AP0022.90.1b.9d36 is the converter of AIR - AP.

    another AP are AIR - LAP: Ok for this model that apply

    What can be the problem with this access point?

    Thanks for your help.

    Lorenzo

    The best for homelessness must have WLC, authentication management. Now, if there is a WAN link rather slow in the game, perhaps, he retorted the initial advantage of it.

    In this case REAP H groups will allow roaming between aps hreap seemless.

    In any case, it does not hurt to combine your APs in Hreap groups. It can only help. So ... :-)

    Nicolas

    ===

    Remember responses of the rate that you find useful

  • Differences between a WLC, WLSE and WCS

    Small question:

    I'm working on a proposal for a new WLAN infrastructure for a certain local government entities.  We use a Cisco WLC 5508.  I wonder what would be appropriate for additional management functions... Basically, I wonder if it would be wise to use a WLSE device... or is a WLSE basically a watered down Wireless LAN Controller?  I also read that the use of WCS is really large deployments... that I proposed would be 1142 32 laps with a WLC...  The client wants to know if there are tools or equipment and the benefits/disadvanteges both management software.  They want all these features... reports which told me in another post that WCS is what would be necessary for these functions.

    Thanks in advance!

    Cole

    WLC = wireless LAN controller.  It is a device of Layer2 AP will join and get their configuration and code.

    WCS = wireless control system.  It is a server on the LAN that uses SNMP for monitoring and the creation of models of the WLC.

    WLSE wireless LAN Solutions engine =.  This is used to monitor and model for autonomous AP.

    So, for what your customer is looking for, WLC 5508 need a WCS.  WCS is were all reporting will come from.

    See you soon,.
    Steve

    --

    If this helps you or answers to your question if it you please mark it as 'responded' or write it down, if other users can easily find it.

  • Differences between 2000 WLC and 4400 series

    In addition to the number of access points supported, what are the differences in features between the WLC 2000 and 4400 series?

    On 2006, you have 4 ports on the back, which can support up to 3 AP directly connected and the port other than your connection to the network and it supports no LAG (aggregation of links). The ports are 10 / 100M, and he cannot be an anchor for a group of mobility.

    On the 4400, either you have a 4402 or a 4404, 2 a 2 interfaces concert and the 4404 has 4 Gig interfaces, you cannot directly connect AP to a 4400. The two 4400's support LAG, and they can serve as anchor points in a group of mobility. What are the major differences in them. They set up near the top of the same and interact with the trendy and the same wireless networks.

  • Problem with WLC and a 3rd-party NMS SNMP AP Assoc/cancellation interruption

    Hello

    I'm troubleshooting an issue, why our NMS is not able to automatically clear an alarm generated trap of an AP that has been separated and is associated with again.

    When debugging on the WLC snmp trap generation, I discovered that when the AP disassociates the WLC sends the trap of bsnAPDisassociated , which is perfectly defined and I can also find in the SNMP Object Navigator. However when the AP reassociates again the WLC sends the ciscoLwappApAssociatedtrap.

    Part 3 NMS is not able to understand it, but our WCS system does, that's why I then took a peek in the MIB file installed.

    I discovered that ciscoLwappApAssociated is a sheet of ciscoLwappApMIBNotifs (1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.513.0. 4), which I have neither

    Cannot be found in the Cisco SNMP Object Navigator or the downloadable MIB.

    As the MIB in the WCS is a XML file I didn't how to get information in the 3rd-party NMS.

    Anyone have any idea on how to solve this problem or there at - it update CISCO-LWAPP-AP-MIB available somewhere?

    Our WLCs are running the latest version of the software (7.0.116.0) as well as our WCS (7.0.172.0)

    Thanks in advance!

    Kind regards

    Patrick

    Such discrepancies sometimes occur. Best is a matter of TAC in order to tackle the problem through a bug or have a new MIB published on cisco.com if necessary

  • Can not put software 4402 WLC

    Hi guys,.

    I am trying to upgrade the software for my WLC 4402, but it keeps saying "Failure" while storing Flash, the only way to upgrade this box is using TFTP, so I changed to a new tftp server (tftpd32 it can handle files larger than 32 MB), the new software is AIR-WLC4400-K9-4-2-176-0.aes (39 MB).

    It seems that the WLC have no more room for another file, and I want to delete the old software to install a new, could someone point me in the right direction?

    Help, please!

    Thanks in advance

    Hello

    What is the version of the software of the WLC? I mean, from what version of what version are we trying to upgrade?

    What is the result after using tftpd32?

    TFTPd32 is a very handy tool and prefer to use when we use the file that is larger than 32 MB

    The lower needs can help you...

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00805f381f.shtml#req

    I would like to know how it works for you.

    Concerning

    Surendra

  • questions about 2100 wlc and lwap connection

    Hello

    I have a few questions, I hope you can answer me.

    In fact, I have a controller connected to 3 Lwap 2100, and they are connected to the WCS. they have a static IP address.

    The distance between each point of access to more than 30 meters.

    1. the distance between the access points affect the accuracy or the stream. How can I calculate this

    2. because the APs use a static IP address, each customer should I connect to the network to add a static ip address? can I do the APs detect clients dynamically?

    I have lwapp reset guide, guide WCS configuration and configuration guide for WLC. If you have more documents or more pls share with me.

    BR

    Yamani

    Hello Ahmed,.

    Yes the distance between AP affect the wireless signal.

    to determine the best location of AP and the distance between them, as the site survey is necessary with the expert of the spectrum wireless or airmagnat...

    You can check the following links for design and RF management

    1) http://tools.cisco.com/squish/1Ea09

    2) http://tools.cisco.com/squish/51a58

    for other questions about DHCP, it is not a must that customer use static IP, you can always configure them with DHCP.

    as an extenal DHCP (like windows server), or on the WLC himself (to the title of controller-> > internal DHCP tab).

    Kind regards

    Talal

    =========
    Please note the answers that you find useful and mark as answer - when is it :-) - so that others can easily find

  • GANYMEDE and WCS

    I'm looking for documents for the configuration of controllers of WCS to use authentication GANYMEDE +.  The current controllers use authentication GANYMEDE + but we have two new controllers that we want to install use GANYMEDE +.  Tried to add the GANYMEDE authentication + and permission, but it does not work.  Someone else put in place the current controllers.  Running 6.x WCS.

    Hello

    I understand that you mean WLC (Controller) and not the WCS (management software).

    Configuration Ganymede + on wlc: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/6.0/configuration/guide/c60sol.html#wp1697872

    I hope this helps.

    Nicolas

    ===

    Remember responses of the rate that you find useful

  • 4402-25 and 25-5508 fault tolerance?

    We have a Cisco 4402-25 running the 7.0.98 software version and we are interested in getting a new controller of 5508.  My question is can I load balance between these two or an act as a master and the other a slave?  Thank you

    We have a Cisco 4402-25 running software version 7.0.98 and we are interested in getting a new 5508 controller.  My question is can I load balance between these two or can one act as a master and the other a slave?

    The most common scenario of those made the access point for joining WLC 1 as a main controller and set up WLC 2 as a secondary controller.  Cisco recommended (or admitted) this inter-controleur roaming should be avoided at all costs.

    Roaming inter-controleur, still at the stage of since 3.X, this is "early childhood" is always in perfect.

    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for