7941G and 7970G conversion to the SIP

Similar Questions

• I downloaded an app from a worker ID mobile shop and I am still registered my ID and I am using the application normally but I wonder if he could access this application and see my pictures and conversations!

  I downloaded an app from a worker ID mobile shop and I am still registered my ID and I am using the application normally but I wonder if he could access this application and see my pictures and conversations!

  Any help please?

  N ° unless you have given him your Apple ID and password, in which case he would have access to your entire account.

  You must download the application using your Apple ID. Otherwise, you will have questions the next time the app must replace or update. Strictly speaking, what you were doing was not quite legal, oven if it was a free app.

• Question about components entering the SIP/h.323 and SRV

  We have our VCS - E put in place for entrants and outbout call to the internet.  We have an SRV record for SIP and H323 audience.

  The SRV record lists the SIP/h.323 services for ourdomain.com, redirecting to video.ourdomain.com.

  I have some problems however;

  When testing with a client of Polycom that does not work with SRV or that has a different implementation of it, we have to deal (alias) @video.ourdomain.com.

  When you use Cisco Jabber (free), it only works when you dial (alias) @ourdomain.com but don't touch our VCS-E at all when you dial (alias) @video.ourdomain.com.  We can compose (alias) @our-public-IP of Jabber OK.

  Cisco Jabber doesn't use regularly debriefed if SRV is not available?

  Optimally all would support SRV, I have to accept that some people that we connect will not support it and I would like to be able to give the same dial in URI to everyone.

  Do I need to register an SRV record for video.ourdomain.com (I don't know yet if we record SRV for subdomains)? Or if I want the same dial in details any material they use, I have to give @public-IP (aka)?

  Cisco 'free version' never took in charge a record search as far as I know.

  The only reason for which you can use on the version "on-prem" is because the VCS-E can be configured to do this, not the customer.

  To ignore completely the DNS and the support of all comers, you will indeed give [email protected] / * /-E_IP_address, that said, as far as H.323 goes you will get a few old systems or systems with the old firmware, Polycom Polycom and LifeSize that only support ip_address ##Alias - so a transformation should be put in place to allow these establishments.

  And Yes, you can configure an SRV for subdomains.

  /Jens

• Terrible problems of conversion of the site to meet the new version of Muse (and other important observations)

  Dear all

  I was very pleased with the new version of sensitive Muse.

  I had downloaded the pre-release version and tested it and presented my comments as a good obedient of Muse Web site designer, after all, we must all contribute to get the best system that actually works.

  Is the day of release and I've updated Muse via my desktop CC application.

  I watched videos Adobe make reference to liberation, that everything online and even read through the excellent series of video training sensitive to themes of Muse.

  Only some of my clients gave me their business with the understanding that I would like to convert their sites Adaptive desktop, Tablet and phone versions to fully responsive as soon as the new version is out.

  A customer has a big launch very soon which also requires the contents of the site changes so I decided to tackle this site first.

  I made a copy of the site and opened it and it converted or whatever Muse only when you open an existing site in the new face.

  I changed all the settings, site, properties etc etc in the offline version of the page.

  Then, I have worked to make the Master suited page.

  It is then that my nightmare began.

  Nothing seemed to work as described and the biggest problem was the clamp that was so slow, late, dried, etc., it was almost unusable.

  In any case, after 18 hours, the page master has been made and when you preview in the development tools Google Chrome seemed reasonable enough.

  Why 18 hours you might ask, well partly because of the clamp problem mentioned previously, but the entire system is extremely inefficient in the way it works with so many questions to consider whether to apply or not apply to each object and a constant in Google Chrome preview as you could not trust what has been is displayed on the screen of Muse.

  Next challenge was to convert the content of the home page. It wasn't a page complex and only consists of 6 pieces - pictures, text and a button on the State.

  I have applied all the settings and slide the clamp to slightly reduce the width of the browser, that when I had to move showed major problems on the page immediately:

  • Huge empty spaces appeared
  • The objects did not adapted as it should and that I had seen in so many videos - so, for example, if a block of text was next to an image they immediately went massively out of alignment when you drag the clip
  • The finished status button on the margins of the page
  • Etc etc.

  In any case, after 6 hours of tearing my hair that I give up and contacted Adobe.

  They began a session remotely and said I had everything set correctly and that Muse wasn't as the developers had planned.

  Finally, they said by e-mail on the .muse file, which I did, and of course I'm sitting here with a looming deadline and still no answer on how to solve the problems, which no doubt all my other existing sites will not have when I come to convert.

  Other problems discovered during my tests to date are:

  • Right click for very slow service
  • Slow to open library (more despite being told you can download several items from the library when you try to load too, a lot (by Muse) everything freezes Muse and you force a fence via the Task Manager)
  • Adjusting the position of the breakpoint by right clicking on the breakpoint window very slow, late development and jerks (IE just like the clip)

  In addition, I was absolutely horrified to see that there were other issues, especially since many objects react at all:

  • Image do not respond in the envelope
  • Compositions of
  • Slideshows
  • Forms
  • Google maps has only reactive width no height as well
  • Google Map inserted via insert HTML while I updated sensitive width, there is not (I guess the code must be added to make all insert sensitive html and some guidance on what could be this code would be useful Adobe, including a video on the subject feature Muse is so limited you must add a large number of html).
  • YouTube has only reactive width no height so completely useless
  • No effect of scrolling on Muse reactive
  • In addition, virtually all 3rd party widgets Muse themes et al. do not work with response as they say they are waiting for Adobe to undertake the necessary work on base first. So any site that uses widgets cannot be converted (and almost all do so because of the lack of functionality of Muse)

  This Muse is not really sensitive and it is useless to creation or conversion of sites until it is.

  Also, I was extremely disappointed to see that despite me and a lot of other designers asking some features via the Forums Muse he had not been included. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Draw ellipses (& circles) and polygons that you can in InDesign in forms or frames of image
  • Site search function
  • Images do not clearly appear in the Muse until preview
  • No password protection function
  • Form always using reCAPTCHA 1 not 2
  • No installation on the forms file upload
  • Slideshow of legends still not discoloration with images
  • No idea if all the SEO issues as I cannot finish a site and scan

  What a disappointment is complete.

  So, for me, sorry Adobe not usable as a form builder free site responsive until much more work has been done, hopefully very soon.

  Kind regards

  Mike

  I just spent two weeks, putting in place a sensitive muse site. I am gray, tired and frustrated. I was so excited to make this project work.

  I wish I had read these articles earlier.

• What is the difference between a virtual machine cloning and v2v conversion to a virtual machine

  What is the difference between a virtual machine cloning and v2v conversion to a virtual machine

  Cloning process is to duplicate a VM. V2V is deploy vm on vsphere environment to another virtual machine format (example: the workstation, hyper-v).

• If I get the basic pdf to Word and Excel conversion Services, it also converts graphics into Word documents?

  If I get the basic pdf to Word and Excel conversion Services, it also converts graphics into Word documents?

  Thanks Dan

  Hi Dan,.

  You can subscribe for services to export it in PDF ( https://cloud.acrobat.com/exportpdf ) to help you can convert all formats of files mentioned in this document KB file formats supported. ExportPDF, Adobe PDF Pack.

  Let me know in case if you have any additional questions.

  Kind regards
  Nicos

• Try to use the converter to push a VMX and VMDK existing in the environment file. Have you tried the Converter 4.3 and 5.0, continues to crash or delay. A 5.1 with ESXI 5.1 vCenter server hosts going conversion.

  Try to use the converter to push a VMX and VMDK existing in the environment file. Have you tried the Converter 4.3 and 5.0, continues to crash or delay. A 5.1 with ESXI 5.1 vCenter server hosts going conversion.

  Take a look at this article. You can try Converter standalone 5.0.1 or 5.1 beta.

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/2033315

• Can anyone advise me on the conversion and submitting CMYK for the first time?   (In a language that is slow and easy to please)

  There is more discussion on this subject (and opinions) that Carter has pills and I have read many of them... but I'm still confused and since I was less than 7 hours to solve this problem, I'm crying out for more help.

  1... I know that I need more to learn about this... but that does nothing my period

  2nd... This is a simple corporate Head-shot that is produced in a print magazine with an article written by my client.

  3rd... The Publisher asked for the photo to be in CMYK mode and since this editor is in the USA, my assumption at this late date is that the standard CMYK color profile - U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 produced by Photoshop is enough.

  I can be on the right track now, but I'm completely side stepping of Lightroom for all editing and staying in Photoshop in Adobe RGB (1998)

  At this time, when I click on view and choose a PROOF, CMYK is selected.  I don't know if it's accurate, or if the selection is premature.

  I plan to complete my edits in PS and then click on IMAGE, click MODE and choose CMYK.           Currently, for my editing process, it is set to RGB

  Hopefully save them as CMYK will be available after changing the MODE, but my save as feature currently available, available only ADOBE RGB (1998).  Also save a copy and a box to include diapers or not.

  Yesterday, when working on this folder, I clicked on the EVIDENCE and CMYK, but I didn't see any difference in the editing...  It maybe because I exported a ProPhoto since Lightroom file as a basis to begin by... I'm not sure, though.

  My concern is as follows... yesterday, I have saved in a CMYK file and it looked fine on my monitor.  I sent it to the customer (I chose the JPG extension) and when she had, the colors were OFF.  She sent the files back to me, and they were indeed average off...  He told me that it was not a matter of calibration of monitor between his PC and mine.   Which brings me to the last question... my monitor is calibrated "to eye" to a company of printer that I use for my regular photography - which worked great!    And unfortunately, at this late date, I can't get a profile of the printer of the editor.

  Thanks for reading all of this... I wonder if my current game plan is sufficient for this late hour...

  No Lightroom

  Edit in Photoshop in ADOBE RGB (1998)

  Keep selection 'PROOF' in CMYK, so that I have change

  At the end of my edit, click MODE and change to CMYK

  Save the file with CMYK to jpg.   (all other types of files are too big for the customer to manage e-mail)

  Am I missing something?

  There are a number of potential problems here, and it may not be at your end.

  First of all, it should be clear that CMYK is not so much a generic "image mode" because it is a description of the specific press conditions. If you produce final CMYK, you need to have the right profile. Do not use Image > Mode, use Convert to Profile.

  Given that, I wonder anyone who does not accept the Adobe RGB photographs for a magazine article, because it involves a process that doesn't is not correctly color generally not up to date and not managed. A typical workflow would today use InDesign, where images are usually placed in their original space of RGB whatever that is. Then the final conversion output CMYK is made as the last step, when you generate a ready PDF to InDesign.

  It helps if you know the final CMYK, because then you can the evidence for that so your file survives the CMYK conversion with the least possible damage (we're talking range cut here, not general color moves). But it is not absolutely necessary, that is why this workflow is relaitively safe.

  Thirdly, CMYK jpeg is itself risky, because several decoders of jpeg (in some software) is not a proper CMYK support. The result can be weird colors. This could well be the problem here, because it sounds as if your customer uses a non-standard workflow.

  So what to do? I would send two files. A sRGB as a reference, which is guaranteed to come out correctly. Then find a way to send TIFF to CMYK version if they insist, or ask them to try to open it in different software. Of course , you should have a calibrated and profiled monitor, but I agree this is probably not the immediate problem here. There is no particular reason that a CMYK file should return to the colors twisted if he opened and processed in color management software correctly.

• Always the color in the photos after the black and white conversion

  Hello

  I have a very strange problem. After the conversion to black and white photos in Lightroom (no matter if I chose B & W in the basic menu, set the saturation to 0, the HSL value 0 saturation sliders or choose a B & W preset) my photos have still a few colors in them. Before and after have exported them.

  The pictures are taken in RAW with a 550 d or a RX100. Same results for all. I use Lightroom 4.3.

  I searched a lot on google and also here in the forum and have not found anything.

  Any ideas?

  Kind regards

  Julian

  

  If you have Lr and PS side by side they appear identical. If they are not something certainly will not, and I agree with ssprengel that it's most likely a monitor profile bad that one of them is choking on.

  If you don't calibrate and profile the monitor yourself (what is the right way to do it), the safest bet is always to use sRGB (or if you have a wide range of monitor the Adobe RGB, but you do not have). > This thread contains a description of how you do it.

  ---

  Some information:

  Monitor profiles contain two parts. One, quite simply, white fixed point, correct the response curve and remove color casts. It is loaded into the video card (or the screen itself) and affects all across the system. This is the part of the calibration.

  The second part is the profile itself, which is more complex. It is, in short, a complete description of the features of monitor in three-dimensional space color. Among other things, it defines exactly the position of the three primaries. It takes the calibration in the image, so in other words it is a description of the screen in its calibrated State. But only color management applications to read the monitor profile and debug to display accordingly. Other applications just ignore it and send the numbers directly through.

  This second part, the profile itself, is what often causes problems because many profiles are not properly written. Manufacturers of monitor (and portable) are known for this. You would think if he succeeds, but it's not fair.

  To compound things, these bad profiles are often pushed through Windows Update, so that people don't even know they are being installed.

• I use windows xp, I have a problem of the file conversion vlc m4as in mp3 and download videos from the net...

  I use windows xp.  I can't convert the m4as vlc mp3 files, or similar, so that i can burn it to disc and sync with my portable mp3 player.  Also, I would like to download videos on the net, how do I do this safely? (I recently downloaded some malicious programs).  A simple step-by-step guide would be appreciated.  Thank you very much.

  I use windows xp.  I can't convert the m4as vlc mp3 files, or similar, so that i can burn it to disc and sync with my portable mp3 player.  Also, I would like to download videos on the net, how do I do this safely? (I recently downloaded some malicious programs).  A simple step-by-step guide would be appreciated.  Thank you very much.

  ========================================
  You * still * trying their luck downloading media
  files on the net... I don't think it's impossible to guarantee
  that no problem will occur.

  That said... the following free software may be useful:

  (FWIW... it's always a good idea to create a system)
  Restore point before installing software or updates)

  Freemake - Free Audio Converter
  http://www.Freemake.com/free_audio_converter/
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)
  (* Read * all * the installation screens... it)
  may be a few items you want to unmark *)

  When you have installed Freemake... Open Freemake
  and drag and drop your audio files on the main screen.

  Or... Click left on the Audio button, then navigate to the
  your audio files are saved in the folder.

  Select (highlight) the files you want to import into
  Freemake and left, click on the button 'open '.

  When your audio files are imported into Freemake,
  On the left, click the MP3 icon at the bottom of the screen.

  The "Output settings" screen opens.  Choose
  ' Save in ' file so you can find the converted files.

  On the left, click the "Convert" button and the files must be
  converted very quickly.

  This should make 23 for a downloader...

  (FWIW... it's always a good idea to create a system)
  Restore point before installing software or updates)

  Freemake Video Downloader
  http://www.Freemake.com/free_video_downloader/
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)
  (* Read * all * the installation screens... it)
  may be a few items you want to unmark *)

  Freemake - how to download the video for free
  http://www.Freemake.com/how_to/how_to_download_video_free

  Freemake - how to download TV shows online
  http://www.Freemake.com/how_to/how_to_download_online_tv_shows

• The customer wants. PDF file as two. TIFF: 500 MB and A1. Conversion help?

  Sorry if this is in the wrong place, but I don't know where else to ask!

  I created a logo for a client in the. PDF format, they asked the help of Adobe Illustrator.

  However, they want the final version in two specific formats: one as a 500MB. A TIFF file and one as a. TIFF file is of a quality suitable for the reproduction of the A1. What would be the easiest way to convert the. PDF to the necessary. TIFF, while maintaining the quality of the original frame for printing, using freeware?

  (As I am a beginner as a designer, I have never used these types of files before and can not find the answers online. I have the entire Adobe suite if that helps.)

  Really grateful to anyone who can help!

  Rasterizes the file on the opening of Photoshop. In this dialog box, you specify the size and resolution of this process.

• After the black and White Conversion, I can still see the color

  LR3.4.1 on a desktop Windows XP SP3.  I opened a raw file in LR, click on change in Silver Efex Pro 2, that the plugin opens and I set the resultant b & w image and save it.  She then appears in LR with the name of the original file and annex suffix Edit-TIFF.  However, instead of appearing in b & w, it appears in color.  I then right-click on that image and select open in Windows Explorer.  I've then right click on the file and select Preview and it appears in the Windows Viewer in b & w.

  So why can't display it in LR in b & W?

  What you see in the library is the preview, which was probably created during the import.  What you visualize in develop is rendered according to the current image data.  Since you changed the image after importing data, the preview of the library has not changed.  Just that the preview is again (there are several ways to do it, but selecting it and using the menu option are the simplest).

• Confused on the conversion of the profiles and effect on values of ink!

  Hi, I wanted to understand what is happening to my values of ink when I convert to a different profile. I set up CS for Europe prepress and working on an INDD file. All related PS images have the same profile.

  The printer sent their profile and asked to convert all the images and the doc INDD. But when I do, looking at the images of PS with color sampling, it changed the values of ink. (For example, which was 100 k in a picture now shows ink in all 4 channels.) It is a problem for me.

  In the past I would just convert to profile to export > stage of pdf which seems to work ok. What should I do? Is there a difference in the printer if I convert to pdf stage, rather than convert all the images of PS and the INDD doc?

  Thanks in advance!

  Converting to a profile Exchange actually ink values?

  In your case, change the profile of the application, will change the values of the ink, but it is difficult to tell how many without comparing the two files.  If you can, try to change the profile on a copy of one of your files.  Then, print proof of contract of the file (if you can).  You can also consult the percentages with the help of a kind of third-party application, Acrobat or Photoshop.

  I think that if you keep your profile until you create the PDF file (where you will ultimately use their profile in the creation of PDF), then maintain you control over your initial destination of color.  A seller of printing has created a profile based on their press, a certain type of paper and implemented (or should have) appropriate for this particular press and paper ink densities.  Using their profile in the creation of PDF files, give them what they want for their RIP.  It's the kind of a way for the supplier to predict the amounts of ink they will get.

  Now, if you give the same PDF to another provider of printing, it may be a 'change', how big or how small is determined by the new provider profile.  So, you don't want to put the same PDF to another printer.  You would be better to get the new print provider profile and use it in the new PDF creation for this printer.

  What is the advantage of convert to profile the printer early in the workflow rather than export pdf stage? (No means that you will have to go back and change all that if, for example, you were to send the job to another printer at a later date?)

  Yes, he average woukld changing all the files in a new destination profile.  There is an advantage if you rely on future jobs to everybody as a simple pressure on the use as a type of paper.  This is often referred to as closed loop to a workflow.  In a closed-loop workflow, you can optimize the density of ink to a press / paper and get consistent results.  When you are potentially going to send the PDF file of several different suppliers, it is referred to as a workflow of open loop.  In an open-loop workflow (yours), you use profiles standard in forecasting for where printing will be.  In the case of your seller who provides you with their printer profile, you simply create another PDF using their profile while retaining all the original application profiles.

  Another thing I don't get - check separations in Acrobat all my text on the black plate only. But when I check the rich black option, it shows the same as dark black text. How can this be?

  I don't know what is happening there.  Since your black (should be) excessive printing, they can be considered as rich blacks even if they are not.  Maybe if blacks were boring, then they would be precise blacks.  That said, the separations to tell the whole story.  If they appear black precise in the seps, then they should RIP like this.  Another reason to be in contact with the print provider and make sure that you get what you want on the press.

• iPhone delete contacts one by one and sending messages to the wrong people

  I have two problems with my contacts that become very cumbersome and no solution, that I could find online.

  Problem 1: a few contacts per week disappear from all my devices, which are synchronized to the top through iCloud. Accordingly, my message thread is largely of numbers and I must discern who everyone is. It is even more difficult to start a new conversation. iCloud is the only place where I store contacts and return to a backup does not help because it will just remove contacts more next week, in addition to losing those that I added since the backup. Usually, it deletes the contact while I am SMS with them, so I saw the name change to a number several times.

  Problem 2: Sometimes I have a person text and it will send the message to another person. It's very strange. I can even make this text a number rather than a name, and it will be text number of the other person. This usually happens between a couple husband and wife, or two people who work in the same place.

  I use Messages to communicate a lot for work, and it's quite get in the way. It is quite complicated to get me out of the entire Apple ecosystem, which I'm deeply rooted in the, because it prevents me from communicating with people and to get anything done. Yet I can find no solution online and have not read even where Apple recognized the problem.

  Please help and please tell me that the next series of OS updates will solve this problem.

  It is certainly a strange phenomenon!

  Have you tried to log in to your iCloud account, then back away from logging in?

  Or perhaps reseting your device - restart your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support

• Several Airport Apple ID devices disappear shared devices and Software Configuration of the airport

  We have three Airport extreme and two Airport Express devices in two offices in the city.  Some time in the last two days, they all stopped appearing in the sidebar of Finder 'Shared' category (if they had attached disk storage) and they stopped from appearing in the Configuration software of the airport on any of the Mac on these networks. (They always seem to be correct, routing traffic, however).

  For a while, we left a desktop completely alone as a control group and did all our testing and troubleshooting in the other office.

  We-hard reset (to the factory configuration) all devices from the airport to an office. They began to appear again. Then we started to re - configure them again.  At the time wherever we had updated the devices they had disappeared again.

  So, another factory discount based configutations for each device to this facility. Then we added slowly in pieces of their configuration.  When airports have received Apple ID and associated passwords for associating with iCloud/BackToMyMac/WideAreaBonjour (depending on what you want to call it), the airport devices disappeared from the airport Setup.

  If we tried to configure another device from the airport to extend a network of 'invisible' airports, the new airports were "unable to find" one of these networks to expand.

  If we reset all devices without providing them with Apple ID and passwords, they worked mainly as you would expect. The main difference being now do not appear as having been recorded as BackToMyMac/WideAreaBonjour devices.

  One side for people dealing with this note: If your router are invisible, but they are configured to be configured from the EXTENSIVE worldwide network, you can use "File-> configure the other" and specify the address WAN of the missing aircraft and get this screen access as one would generally. From here, remove all the Apple ID associated with these devices, press "Refresh" to save the settings and they seem to reappear magically in the Configuration of the airport software.

  In that State, storage seems to be available, but only for devices in Domain Local (direct connection). Airports without AppleIDs will not appear in the field to iCloud/BackToMyMac/WideAreaBonjour, and it's as expected, given that these IDS is the means for the identification of their field.

  If someone else has noted these behaviors and if so, have an idea about specifically when they first appeared? Is there by any chance someone who knows of any change in registration or the MWAC of multiplication?

  Did you approach the problem exactly as I did in the past, and having encountered problems of the CCMM literally every version of OS X. They were all distinct problems with individual characteristics, and in some cases the solutions exist. Having said that the CCMM has been completely reliable recently - which means running the most recent El Capitan release on all my Macs. The initial versions (i.e. OS X 10.11 to 10.11.3 maybe) didn't work at all. I don't know which version fixed whatever the problem was, I am sure he has not worked for someone else.

  The same real place with Yosemite and previous versions as well. CCMM did not reliable until the exit "point three or four."

  Through these experiments, I believe it should be a pretty fast connection. If the connection between a Mac and all the others does not meet this requirement (whatever that is) all you will be able to determine, it's that the CCMM fails.

  Apple is characteristically silent about the technical aspects of the CCMM, probably because of security concerns. Nobody outside Apple knows how it works. If you're still having problems, I encourage you to contact them. After mentioning predictable you corrective raw materials (the two following links) you will be put in touch with someone who will look to what is false, providing diagnostic assistance and send your information to engineering. If it's something they should fix, you'll know not to the point of an OS X update is published.

  Set up and use Back to My Mac - Apple Support

  Get help using Back to My Mac - Apple Support

  With all the conversations I had with Apple on this topic (which were many, involving a large amount of tests) not once they disclose any causal factors individual, other than to reiterate the need to run the last OS X, versions and the latest versions of firmware for their routers. In your case, that means probably that your Mac update to El Capitan. It is after all the very first recommendation in their document of support above, until you do this you will still not get in step 1.