85mm 1.8 lens and filter

Similar Questions

• Photoshop cs6 Lens Blur filter missing

  Hey guys please help me! my lens blur filter is missing and I can't find anywhere, nor find all messages dealing with the same problem. So if you have experienced the same thing or have suggestions that can help to face the problem let me know.

  Thanks in advance!

  Photoshop: Should be in the filter-> blur-> menu Lens blur.

  On a Windows PC , you can watch here:

  C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop version\Required\Plug-Ins\Filters

  There should be a Lens Blur.8bf.

  On OSX it takes a similar organization. The file type would be 8bf.

• Can I create new folders and filter emails to them when using folders, unified inbox

  Spent in IMAP and ended up with two inboxes (w8dn & weightdn @...). Switched to records unified to get all emails in one place. I get emails from many of many email lists if you need to create folders and filter emails in the appropriate folder. I can make this as set up or will it return to the POP server?

  Thank you
  Mike / W8DN

  Yes. Local folders account is provided by Thunderbird for just this purpose; a generalized situation of storage independent of the account. The filter is located under Tools | Message filters. Right click on the sender in a message header will also create a filter.

  With Thunderbird, you by default will have a separate set of folders for each account. This way gives you the opportunity to keep separate accounts (some users require) and you can also use the saved searches, Unified files and local files to merge accounts (other users require too!)

• My Minolta Maxxum AF 70-210 lens and the AF 28-80 (from 35 mm) lens will work on Sony cameras?

  I have a 35mm Minolta Maxxum HT TR and it has two lenses, the AF 70-210 and the AF 28-80 lens, and I would like to know if they would work on the all new cameras as they are still excellent lenses. Just hate buy new if I can buy a camera that is good who can use these lenses too. Thank you

  Here is a list of supported lenses:

  https://us.en.KB.Sony.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/30086

  Hope that helps, and that your lenses are

• Reg: How join in to retrieve and filter the terms of an interface

  Hi team,

  Please let me know the query to retrieve the join conditions and filter to an interface.

  Thanks in advance

  Thank you

  Gael k

  Hi GG,.

  Please check this box.

  SELECT

  F.FOLDER_NAME,

  P.POP_NAME INTERFACE_NAME,

  P.TABLE_NAME,

  T.FULL_TEXT JOIN_OR_FILTER_TEXT,

  DECODE (PC.) EXPRESSION_TYPE TYPE_DE_JOINTURE, 'J', 'REACH', 'FILTER')

  OF SNP_FOLDER F

  INNER JOIN SNP_POP P

  ON F.I_FOLDER = P.I_FOLDER

  INNER JOIN SNP_DATA_SET DS

  ON DS. I_POP = P.I_POP

  INNER JOIN SNP_POP_CLAUSE PC

  ON PC. I_DATA_SET = DS. I_DATA_SET

  INNER JOIN SNP_TXT_HEADER T

  ON PC. I_TXT_SQL = T.I_TXT;

  Thank you!

  Saran.

• How did the same predicate is completed access and filter?

  SELECT select, j.job_title, d.department_name

  OF e hr.employees, hr.departments d, hr.jobs j

  WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id

  AND e.job_id = j.job_id

  AND select LIKE 'a % ';

  Execution plan

  ----------------------------------------------------------

  Hash value of plan: 975837011

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | 3. 189. 7 (15) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 1 | HASH JOIN | 3. 189. 7 (15) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 2 | HASH JOIN | 3. 141. 5 (20) | 00:00:01 |

  | 3. TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | EMPLOYEES | 3. 60. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | EMP_NAME_IX | 3 | | 1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | 5. TABLE ACCESS FULL | JOBS | 19. 513. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  | 6. TABLE ACCESS FULL | DEPARTMENTS | 27. 432. 2 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("E".") DEPARTMENT_ID "=" D ". ("" DEPARTMENT_ID ")

  2 - access("E".") JOB_ID '=' J '. ("' JOB_ID ')

  4 - access ("E". "Last_name" LIKE 'A %') "

  filter ("E". "LAST_NAME" LIKE 'A %') "

  I understand not only how to select column is evaluated by the access and filter? Can someone there explain please? Or recommend me an article or document that explain this predicate excatly explains to explain the plan?

  Thanks in advance.

  Near NightWing.

  I believe that the predicate can be used to access THE index entries and if entries of access could include potentially "false positives" then filtering is required to remove the FPs.

  This filtering can be done in the same step of the operation (such as access) or as an extra step.

  My apologies, this has become much longer and more detailed that I intended it to be. :-(

  If I understand correctly,

  In terms of the explanation of the path, each step can include access and filtering process for "entries" (index or line). In the plan to explain the predicate section shows Information the use of predicate for step 'matching. "

  Some predicates can be "used" to ACCESS (ing) the entries, while the same or additional predicates (or even other) can be "used" to FILTER (ing) access entries (which have been consulted, but the optimizer is not sure that EACH AACCESSed entry is indeed a part of final result set). In such cases optimizer applies filtering predicate also during the operation stage. The optimizer can sometime even add additional operation steps or predicate [almost like a short circuit]

  So, using our previous configuration, allow us to run test cases.

  In this query we use AS predicate but the operand does NOT contain any 'wild' character In this case INDEX RANGE SCAN is performed, but since there is no wild characters are involved we can be sure that each entry using this predicate is indeed part of the final result set. This predicate Section shows that the predicate is used ONLY to access (index) entries.

  We know that the result set of this query is NULL lines.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 as "A".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" = 'A')

  However, in this application, there is a wildcard character in the predicate, so while the INDEX RANGE SCAN step access entries using this predicate, it could potentially access entries that can be part of the final result set. So in the SAME step of the INDEX RANGE SCAN operation the predicate is also used for filtering. Since this is the only predicate, it may seem redundant.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like 'a % '.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  filter ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  If we add an another predicate as below (also includes wild character), it gets interesting. INDEX RANGE SCAN step performs two access AND filtering.

  Please note that the predicate 'V1' AS '%' is used to ACCESS and FILTER, fine FILTER uses additional predicates.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like 'A %' and v1 as "%c".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access ("V1" LIKE 'A %')

  filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE 'A %') AND "V1" LIKE "%c"

  When we change the predicate 'V1' LIKE 'A %' to 'V1' > 'A', then we can use the predicate to access entries AND do not forget that each entry using this predicate are

  Indeed part of results if other predicates are met. In this case optimizer of must not filter on 'V1' > 'A', wherever it must continue to filter on 'V1' LIKE '%c '.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1 as "%c".

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     7.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("V1">'A')

  filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE "%c")

  Of course, if we do the predicate so that the entries are NOT accessible using the predicate, then for INDEX FULL SCAN (no Beach cannot be determined) operation comes into play and the predicate of ACCESS goes. All entries in the index are ALWAYS accessible (predicate applied no ACCESS) and FILTER predicate is applied.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 like '%c %'

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     8 S     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX SCAN FULL | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     8 S     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter ("V1" IS NOT NULL AND "V1" LIKE '%A%c')

  For the example proposed by JL, two predicates are used in the INDEX RANGE SCAN step to access THE entries. In addition, we can be sure that all entries that are accessible with success using this predicate can be included in the final result set. So not necessary filtering.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<>

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  |*  1 |  INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |    24.   168.     1 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("V1">'A' AND "V1")<>

  Interestingly, when we change the 'B' in the previous query to 'A', change predicates of inequality, so we cannot use index. Optimizer knows this and switches for FTS and introduced an additional step of operation FILTER. In my view, the filter predicate can be applied in operation of FTS. Additional FILTER stage is the predicate as FALSE hard-coded value. It does not yet use our predicate of the query.

  Well, don't know if he actually bypasses the operation of FTS. SQL trace can indicate that.

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<>

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1.     8 S     0 (0) |          |

  |*  1 |  FILTER |      |       |       |            |          |

  |   2.   TABLE ACCESS FULL | TST |    49.   343.     3 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (NULL IS NOT NULL AND NULL IS NOT NULL)

  Subsequently, optimizer decides to use the INDEX RANGE SCAN, even if the predicate is always an inequality. Go figure...

  > explain plan for select v1 of tst where v1 > 'A' and v1<=>

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |           |     1.     8 S     0 (0) |          |

  |*  1 |  FILTER |           |       |       |            |          |

  |*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN | TSTV1_IDX |     1.     8 S     0 (0) | 00:00:01 |

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - filter (NULL IS NOT NULL)

  2 - access("V1">'A' AND "V1")<>

  As others have said, it is difficult to understand and predict the path, but fortunately Oracle doing the right thing, 99% of the time.

  VR

  Sudhakar

• simple question about access to information of predicate and filter

  Hello Experts

  I know that maybe this is a very simple and fundamental question. I read a lot of articles on explains the plan and trying to understand what are 'access' and 'filter' which means?
  Please correct me if I'm wrong, I guess when the index of explain plan can use predicate choose access if the explain command plan go with complete table filter scan (witout index) is chosen.

  My last question is, can you recommend me an article or document will contact plan to explain it in clear language and base level?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  as the name suggests, access predicate is when data access based on a certain condition. Filter predicate is when the data is filtered by this condition after reading.

  For example, if you have a select * FROM T1 WHERE X =: x AND Y =: y, where X column is indexed, but column Y is not, you can get a map with an INDEX RANGE SCAN with access predicate = X: x (because you can use this condition to when selecting the data to be read and read only sheets of index blocks that meet this condition) and ACCESS BY ROWID from TABLE with the filter predicate Y =: y (because you cannot check this condition until after reading the table block).

  I'm not aware of any good articles on the subject, and unlike others I can't find Oracle enough detailed documentation. I suggest you read a book, for example Christian Antognini, "Troubleshooting Oracle performance problems."

  Best regards

  Nikolai

• Hi, I have 4 of Lightroom, but it does not support the new objective of pd 10-30 for my Nikon 1. It is supported in LR5. Can I download the profile of this lens and install in LR4?

  Hi, I have 4 of Lightroom, but it does not support the new objective of pd 10-30 for my Nikon 1. It is supported in LR5. Can I download the profile of this lens and install in LR4?

  Wow! It worked! Thank you very much! You just saved me buying a new verion of Lightroom (which is of course why Adobe does not update these profiles automatically).

  Thank you very much!

• the A6000 kit lens and lens hoods

  My a6000 (18-50 mm) kit lens came with a hood, but because of my extra lenses (telephoto lens and 50 mm).  Most people add a hood when shooting with the kit lens?

  Yes, there is no hood for the 16-50, and a lens hood on the 16-50 would cause significant vignetting, which the 16-50 already has enough of.

• shared services and filter

  Hi guru
  
  How can I assign a filter to a shared services group. I created a group of SSP and filter in the EA. What I have to click export shared services? where in shared services will I see my filter to make it effective on the Group
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Refer to this topic. The same has been discussed here...

  Re: Granting of filters without writing maxl

• Interpretation of the predicate information and filter explain plan

  If anyone can help understand how the effects of operation predicate and filter execution plan.or how can I complete the transaction descriptor or filter chosen by the optimizer is not optimized.

  User445775,

  Paraphrasing I provided in my previous post was on page 74 of "fundamental Oracle cost-based.

  How the word explanation...

  Suppose you have a database table that contains all phone numbers and addresses of individuals in a State. A query is run to find user445775 in the city named 'Redmond '. Assume that the query looks like this:

  SELECT
    PHONE
  FROM
    PHONE_NUMBERS
  WHERE
    CITY = 'Redmond'
    AND FULL_NAME = 'user445775';
  

  Suppose that there is no index on the table. The DBMS_XPLAN would show two predicates applied during a comprehensive analysis of the filter - this probably indicates an ineffective path, especially if there are a very small percentage of people that match the WHERE clause on the table restrictions.

  Now, suppose that an index is created on the CITY column. The DBMS_XPLAN would show an access descriptor applied to the index on the CITY column and a predicate to filter on the table access by index for the FULL_NAME. We have eliminated a large number of possible lines by applying the predicate of access to directly access the rows with the city of interest and then filtered those names that were not "user445775". It is not terribly effective, especially if there are a large number of people to 'Redmond' which should be filtered.

  Now, suppose that we drop the index on the CITY column and create an index on the FULL_NAME column. The DBMS_XPLAN would show an access descriptor applied to the index on the FULL_NAME column and a predicate to filter on the table access by index for the CITY column. This could be a quite effective plan if there is only a few lines in the table with 'user445775' FULL_NAME, as a few lines will be ignored after access to the index to find those with CITY = 'Redmond '.

  Now, suppose that we drop the index on the FULL_NAME column and create a composite index over the CITY, FULL_NAME. The DBMS_XPLAN would show a predicate of access applied to the index on the columns of the CITY and FULL_NAME and it would not be a predicate to filter on the table access by index - in this case, it will reject all the lines once retrieved by index access.

  Page 211 "Troubleshooting Oracle performance" also shows a clear explanation of the predicates access and filter.

  Think of access predicates (on the index at least) as throwing the lines until they are retrieved from the disk (or memory) and filter predicates such as throwing the lines after they are retrieved from the disk (or memory).

  Charles Hooper
  IT Manager/Oracle DBA
  K & M-making Machine, Inc.

• Profiles of lenses of Photoshop CS6 No. (lens correction filter) for Canon 6 d raw files

  LightRoom and Camera Raw have Lens Correction profiles and all lenses available today are in the list for the Canon 6 d of the raw files. BUT the Correction of filter/optics if Photoshop CS6 only have 2 Tamron lenses listed. Weird that there are a of the profiles of lenses for the Canon 6 d raw files in Lightroom and Camera RAW, but not CS6 filter/Lens Correction.

  Camera RAW, LR and PS are up-to-date... NOTE: I have a Canon G11, 7 d and 1 d Mark II N and all their files work as expected. It's only the RAW files created by Canon 6 d.

  All of the suggestions.

  To the right of where it says the search criteria, click on the small icon of three bars-arrow and uncheck the Match sensor size and should learn more.

• Correction of the lens and Raw or JPEG

  Please bear with me, I'm sometimes a little slow.

  I just loaded JPEG one friend in ACR, to see if I could fix the distortion. The image has no EXIF. The list of lenses Nikon-fit was much shorter that usual - is that because it is a JPEG, rather than a raw file?

  I was surprised that the 16-85mm lens was not in the list, as I know that it has been added to the point 6.2. After hunting for PCL files, I see that there is a RAW version only, so this fits in my guess. So, my next question is: why Adobe provides two profiles with a few drinks (raw + jpeg) and the other with others?

  I gave up to the cab and loaded the JPEG in CS5. In the CS5 lens Corrections, I was allowed to assign a raw profile only to my JPEG. It is good, but why am I here and not in ACR?

  And a smaller, but nevertheless niggling question and maybe a little off-topic, why optical Correction CS5 is offering "NIKON" and "NIKON CORPORATION" as a brand of camera, when others have only one entry?

  Yammer P, yes the list is shorter because it's a jpeg rather than crude oil, and we have several profiles for raw to jpeg.

  For all of the lenses supported in the initial release of CS5, we have created profiles for both first and jpeg. Since then, we have focused on profiles of lenses based on the crus, for various reasons (which is that we feel that we always deliver the best results of quality in this way). That of why you see some lenses supported with raw & jpeg profiles, but much more taken support with raw only.

  Correction of the plugin CS5 lens indeed allow you to choose the lens focused on the raw profiles even if it treats a file made (for example, jpeg, tiff). This will work in some cases many (but not all) for the distortion correction, but often is malfunctioning for chromatic aberration and vignette correction. I do not recommend this workflow and is a key reason we don't let the users/layout in ACR and LR.

  Eric

• County and filter the number of occurrences of the string in an array

  Hello... I need to filter and count display for number of channels occur in a single column of an array of strings... I can't explain... below I represented all that is my need.  Column A is the array of input strings... Column B and C are the bays of the output...

  Column A column B column C

  Apple Apple 3

  Banana, mango 2

  Mango banana 1

  Apple

  Apple

  Mango

  Can someone help me...?

  Here, I wrote a small example of what I mentioned above.

  

• Camera, lens and strap.

  Hello guys! In your experience, what is the heaviest lens, you can get on Canon 5diii and safely with the strap attached to the camera? I know that a lot of people do with 70-200 f2.8 ii (~ 3 lbs) or 85 1.2ii (~ 2 pounds), but what about heavier lenses, such as 200 f2.0? It will damage the frame as much as it is like that?

  Thanks for your comments!

  "I have Canon 200 2.0 and I wonder if or not it is safe to hold the lens like this?

  First, it uses a D4 and I use Canon 1 d cameras '' series. '' Who are hard as nails. As difficult as it gets in the cameras.

  I'd be willing to bet that if you can lift the handset with just photo/goal unit using the body of the camera, it's safe. These cameras are made of solid magnesium. They have no plastic.

  On smaller cameras, if not do or even try it.

  You do not want a series 1 d and a Canon 200 mm f2 around your neck for a long time!  A black fast is better, but even it becomes boring after an hour or two.

  Bottom line, why run the risk?