Adding static route to the ACS

Similar Questions

• Problems when adding static routes to esxi 5.5 c

  Hello

  I read this KB on adding static routes:http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 2001426

  But I'm unable to add static routes to my esxi 5.5. host. am I missing something here?

  ~ # esxcfg - road - l

  VMkernel itineraries:

  Interface of network gateway subnet mask

  10.238.187.0 255.255.255.0 subnet local vmk0

  10.238.188.0 255.255.255.0 subnet local vmk1

  by default 0.0.0.0 10.238.187.1 vmk0

  ~ # esxcli network ip route add - 10.238.188.1 - network 10.238.188.0/24 gateway ipv4

  In double track 10.238.188.0/24 found in the network.  Please remove first the old road.

  Kindly help.

  You cannot add a new gateway for a subnet exists in the vmkernel as you can't have two default gateway.

• Next hop for the static route on the VPN site to site ASA?

  Hi all

  I would be grateful if someone could help me with my problem ASA/misunderstanding. I have a VPN site-to site on a SAA. I want to add a floating static route to point to the VPN on the ASA. Note that the traffic in this way is not with in subnets cryptographic ACL that is used to bring up the VPN. This VPN is used only as a backup.

  The static route with the next hop add local public address or the remote public address of the VPN? The next break maybe local ASA isp internet facing interface? I intend to do on the ASDM. I'm sorry if it's a simple question but I found no material that explains this?

  Concerning

  Ahh, ok, makes sense.

  The next hop should be the next jump to the interface that ends the VPN connection, essentially the same as your Internet connection / outside the next hop interface.

  Example of topology:

  Site B (outside interface - 1.1.1.1) - (next hop: 1.1.1.2) Internet

  The static route must tell:

  outdoor 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.2 200

  I hope this helps.

• Adding static routes to ESXi host

  Hello

  Is it possible using PowerCLI to add static routes to ESXi host? If not, is there another way to add roads without using the console?

  Hello, leitsu-

  Yes, it is possible with PowerCLI.  Take a look at the New-VMHostRoute cmdlet.

• Adding interface routed in the State of dynamic routing

  I have a 3560 which hangs a 6509. The next SVI s direct on the 3560:

  192.168.181.1(VLAN 192.168.180.1 (VLAN 180), 181), 192.168.182.1 (VLAN 182), 192.168.183.1 (VLAN 183), 192.168.184.1 (VLAN 183).

  I want to create the router eigrp statement that says:

  Router eigrp 777

  network 192.168.180.0 0.0.0.225

  network 192.168.181.0 0.0.0.225

  network 192.168.182.0 0.0.0.225

  network 192.168.183.0 0.0.0.225

  network 192.168.184.0 0.0.0.225

  Now for the routed on the 3506 interface that is 192.168.0.17 can I create a statement of routing for the and it's as simple as network 192.168.0.17 0.0.0.3?  What of the other side do I add network 192.168.0.17 0.0.0.3 in the instruction of network on the 6509?

  Jon isn't that statement back? If it shouldn't be 192.168.0.16 0.0.0.3?

  My mistake, you are right, it should be as you say.

  Sorry about that :-)

  Jon

• Connecting two routers via a static route

  I have a relatively simple configuration involving a Wireless-N Router and a wireless-B router (several years).  The N wireless router is connected to the internet (via DSL modem) and accepts several DHCP clients without problem.  Wireless - b router is connected to the Wireless-N router.  To do this, I connected the WAN port on the router wireless - b to a port on the router Wireless N ethernet (did not use the uplink). I have a PC connected to the router wireless - b, so I want him to be able to hit the internet, but also be accessible to DHCP clients on the Wireless N router.  The PC connects to the internet successfully, but it does not find clients on the network supported by the Wireless-N router.  It's about my setup:

  B 192.168.55.1 wireless router (LAN) 192.168.56.102 (WAN)

  PC 192.168.55.10 (active dhcp)

  Wireless N 192.168.56.1 (LAN) x.x.x.x (internet)

  (several clients dhcp... 192.168.56.100...)

  I've added a static route in the hope that a computer on the network of the Wireless N router would be able to hit the PC, but nothing helped. I've added a static route as such, on the Wireless-N router, which was the only way that that would enable the web interface:

  Destination LAN 192.168.55.0

  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0

  Gateway 192.168.56.102

  I tried to place the router without wireless - B gateway mode, then router and changed mode, then return.  I can connect to the web interface of the router wireless - b from the PC, and I can connect to the internet from the PC.  Also, the PC is able to reach customers on Wireless N, but the reverse is not true, i.e. clients on Wireless N can't find clients on the wireless - B network. Also, I turned on the port forwarding on the router wireless - B so that it points to the PC, in the hope he would lead all traffic to the PC, but still cannot access PC.  How to configure both routers (or both set up as access point?) so that clients on the Wireless N Router can talk to customers on the wireless router - B?  For now, all customers are on DHCP, but finally, I would like to create static entries for at least two or three of them.

  Thanks in advance

  Are Linksys routers teas? If so what model is router B? It may not supported for a DHCP client port forwarding. Even if you can get the port forwarding to work for a client on router B, it will not work for several clients.

  In addition, if you have the option in router B, disable the SPI Firewall. It is the cause of the problem, in my opinion. If you do this, you should port forward.

  Is there a reason that you connect the routers via the WAN port on the router B? You could uplink using an ethernet port on the B to an ethernet port on the N and avoid all this... You can always configure router B as a point of wireless access for specific customers.

• Static routing

  Hello

  I'm trying to set up a NSX environment using the static routes. As I am not a network expert, I need help here. Let me describe my environment:

  -NSX 6.2.1 is installed

  -DLR one is deployed and a logical switch is created. 172.16.10.0/24 is assigned to the logical switch and a few virtual machines are running.

  -One ESG is deployed. The GSS and the DLR are connected a logical switch in Transit and on the static route is added between the two.

  -The GSS was uplinked to the outside world via External-vDS and having 192.168.10.10 as IP uplink

  Now, the problem is that I can't reach the virtual computers in the VXLAN (172.16.10.0/24) from external computers.

  I have to add a static route on the device Physics (Cisco router) (route ip 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.10)?

  If it is not needed, what I have to do this work?

  I really appreciate your answers.

  Thank you

  You'll want to make sure that traffic destined to the networks behind the GSS is correctly routed through the physical network in the overlay.  One way to do would be to use a static route as you had mentioned to the physical router.  Once in place, the GSS would need a static route to send traffic for 172.16.10.0/24 network to the DLR.  The DLR would need a default route, which would point to the internal GSS interface, while the GSS would have a default route pointing to the physical router.

• Routing to the unauthorized via switch Ethernet HP 1910 169.254.0.0/16 subnet

  Hello

  I have a somewhat unusual situation at a customer site. They have an HP 1910 as a default gateway on their local network Ethernet switch. This is related to a Fortigate Firewall with a regular DSL connection and a WAN link to emote subnets. The question we have is that a new remote site has become active on the Wan. The unusual thing is that they have a 169.254.0.0/16 subnet. Don't ask me why this address range has been used but it is there. (169.254.0.0/16 is a space of address reserved for windows clients that cannot receive an IP via DHCP)

  The client is when they try and access a resource on 169.254.0.0/16 through the switch and on the Wan of the HP 1910 switch removes the packages and will not pass them. I have trioed add static routes on the switch, but it does not transmit packets 169.254.0.0/16. Al, the other traffic is very well. Has anyone ever encountered this weird behavior?

  I think I knew the people. Article 2.7 of the RFC section https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3927 which States that to 169.254.0.0/16 packages be sent to layer 3.

  Do not know why some devices transmit these packets, but it seems that best practices is for devices of L3 to drop packets that have 169.254.0.0/16 in their source/destination IP address fields.

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• Add a static route to a RV042

  I have configured the RV042 dual WAN port for backup smart link connected to two different ISPS.  The subnet behind this is 192.168.2.xxx.  I have a second router linksys Garland with the 192.168.2.250 WAN port and subnet behind it is 192.168.20.xxx.  My problem is that I have a not able to route traffic fron 192.168.2.xxx to 192.168.20.xxx.  How can I add a static route so that clients on 192.168.2.xxx can access resources on 192.168.20.xxx?

  1. the second Linksys router must be changed of gateway (active NAT) in router mode (NAT disabled) mode. With NAT the LAN behind the second Linksys will be not accessible from the outside unless you configure port forwarding.

  2. on the RV042 set up a static route for the subnet 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 to the gateway IP address 1921.68.2.250 on the LAN interface.

  3. Ideally, you must configure the same static route on all clients connected to the RV042. If you don't want to do this, you must configure the firewall on all clients on the RV042 accept ICMP redirect messages. This is important because otherwise all traffic from 192.168.2. * to * 192.168.20 would be sent to the RV042 and from there to the second Linksys that is unnecessary and could create a bottleneck.

• Static routing question

  I just took a WRT610N and configure a few static routes for my network.

  I have the router connected to a cable modem WAN and the interface of local network connected to my LAN via 192.168.0.1.

  I have three other LAN subnets in a test environment, they are:-

  172.16.0.0/24

  172.16.100.0/24

  172.16.200.0/24

  I tried to add the following to the first subnet:

  Destination = 172.16.0.0 LAN IP address

  Subnet mask = 255.255.255.0

  Gateway = 172.16.0.1

  Interface = LAN

  No matter what I try, I get a message saying route static invalid, and I can't get anything to stick.  Everyone can't see what I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you guys!

  Gary

  The IP address of the gateway in a static route is the IP address of the connected device directly on each side of the router, either on the ethernet LAN or WAN side.

  In particular you cannot route a subnet of an IP address of the gateway inside the target IP subnet. The static route example you deposited directions where to send traffic destined to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0. It is impossible to set the address of the gateway as 172.16.0.1 because the router doesn't know where to send the traffic to 172.16.0.1.

  In other words, the IP address of the gateway must in most cases be a 192.168.0. * IP address that you use these IP addresses in the local network of the WRT. The IP address of the gateway should be the IP address of the router on the subnet specific target within your local network.

  For example, if your second router with address 172.16.0.1/255.255.255.0 IP LAN has an IP 192.168.0.2, then the 192.168.0.2 is the IP address of the gateway for the static route to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0.

• Subinterface-vlan-static route

  I tried the static route to the network 192.168.0.0/29 and 192.168.0.8/29. The result is PC1 still does not see PC3

  request: PC1 ping PC3 successful /vlan2

  photo here:

  Hello levantriet2881,

  I'm confused as to what you're asking.  On what router you add static routes, and what looked like the roads?  PC1 is unable to ping PC3?  But can ping to PC2?  Ping PC3 PC2 does What look like on each router's routing tables?  What is the configuration of uplink on the switch port look like?  Certainly need more information levantriet2881.

• Explain SGE2000/P static routing (equal to L2 +)?

  L2 + mean?  I know these aren't L3 switches with IVR capabilities, then what is the purpose to configure static routes, if there is no functionality InterVLAN routing?

  T.I.A.,

  Chris

  Welcome to Cisco Community!

  With get them into a huge discussion, I will try to respond as quickly and directly as possible.

  Our EMS and EMS in the series switches are layer 3 switches (can also be configured as L2) so that they are able to operate as a (inter VLAN) router or gateway for all the VLANS. Once you have created the VLANS and assign an IP address, that IP address will become the GW for this VLAN. Under routing, you will not see any scholarly networks until what you assign the VLAN to a port and the port is enabled. You will then need to configure a default route to send traffic to the cloud. The router must belong to the same VLAN on the switch. So if the switch has an IP address of 172.16.30.1/24, the router will have an IP address of 172.16.30.254/24 for example. The road reads: next hop metric 172.16.30.254 0.0.0.0/0 2 (or higher).

  With respect to the static routes as a switch L2 or L3, that they would be useful when you have a device connected to another switch that is disjoint from your typical network of the local switch. In other words, let's say you have 3 (except default native VLAN 1) VLAN V10 - 30. Everything you devices belong to these VLANs, but you have a server on 30 VLAN that is not connected to this switch. You will then create a static route for the IP address of this server to the remote switch.

  VLAN30: 172.16.30.1 (local EMS)

  Server: 172.16.30.200 (on the remote switch)

  Remote switch: 192.168.20.1 (distance EMS)

  VLAN30: 172.16.30.2 (on the EMS distance)

  Static route:

  hop metric 172.16.30.2 next destination 172.16.30.200 2

  I hope that answers your question. These are really my favorite switches, because I find them very reliable and highly configurable. I love these things.

• Static route of VPN in EIGRP redistribution (FD is Inaccessible)

  Hi all

  I redistribute the site to site VPN static route in EIGRP, but what I noticed on the 6509 when I sh ip eigrp 200 topol, the static route to the ASA "FD is inaccessible."

  6509 output:

  Topology EIGRP-IPv4 for AS(200)/ID(10.33.95.34 table)

  Code: P - passive, A - Active, U - update, Q - Query, R - reply,.

  r response status, s - AIS status

  P 199.x.x.240/28, successors 1, FD 53760, tag is 36539

  through reallocation (53760/0)

  P 10.64.129.0/24, successors 1, FD is 28416

  Via 10.210.98.200 (28416/28160), Vlan98

  P 10.1.2.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible

  Via 10.210.98.200 (28416/28160), Vlan98

  P 10.210.98.0/24, successors 1, FD is 2816

  Via connected, Vlan98

  ASA5510 output:

  Topology EIGRP-IPv4 for AS(200)/ID(10.64.129.253 table)

  Code: P - passive, A - Active, U - update, Q - Query, R - reply,.

  r response status, s - AIS status

  P 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via Rstatic (28160/0)

  P 10.64.129.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via connected, Ethernet0/0

  P 199.x.x.240 255.255.255.240, successors 1, FD 79360, tag is 36539

  Via 10.210.98.254 (79360/53760), Ethernet0/1

  P 10.210.98.0 255.255.255.0 successors 1, FD is 28160

  Via connected, Ethernet0/1

  The ASA config:

  200SW_EIGRP list standard access allowed 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0

  permissible static in eigrp route map 10

  200SW_EIGR match ip address

  Router eigrp 200

  redistribute static static in eigrp route map

  external route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 x.x.x.

  Thank you

  Thomas,

  When the flight director is not accessible in the EIGRP topology table, the router does not use this EIGRP route in its routing table.

  Probably, the road is overridden by any other routing protocol that has the lowest administrative distance.

  Could you please share the routing table?

  Thank you.

• Add Static route on ESXi 5.5!

  Hello

  I am trying to add a static route in the esxi using the command 'esxcli ip route ipv4 network add x.x.x.x - n x.x.x.x/xx g '. When I run this command a static route is created and applied to vmkernel port group by default vmk0. I want the static route applied to vmk3 instead of vmk0. Please me tips on how to do it.

  Thank you

  TA.

  Hi Sai,

  It's easy :-)

  vmk3: 10.28.184.8

  iSCSI target: 10.28.184.10

  vmk3 and your iSCSI target IP address are in the same subnet, so there is no need for any gateway, by default or not, or for routing.  The IP addresses in the same subnet can speak throughout the day without leaving the subnet or involving communication via a gateway.

  Yes, all vmkernel ports assumes that the default gateway of the vmkernel, but vmkernel ports other management port management is generally useless to speak in the first place outside their own subnet.

  Some examples of use of vmkernel ports case how they communicate generally:

  NFS - should speak only within its own subnet

  iSCSI - should speak only within its own subnet

  vMotion - should speak only within its own subnet

  Fault tolerance - should speak only within its own subnet

  vSphere replication - can talk within its own subnet, perhaps one VLAN stretched if in different sites, otherwise a static route can be configured

  I missed everything vmkernel port types?  I think that all down for the most part.

  -Mike

  -----------------------------------------

  Remember to mark this reply 'proper' or 'useful', if you found it useful.

  Mike Brown

  NetApp, VMware and Cisco data center guy

  Consultant engineer

  [email protected]

  Twitter: @VirtuallyMikeB

  Blog: http://VirtuallyMikeBrown.com

  LinkedIn: http://LinkedIn.com/in/michaelbbrown