Add Static route on ESXi 5.5!

Similar Questions

• Adding static routes to ESXi host

  Hello

  Is it possible using PowerCLI to add static routes to ESXi host? If not, is there another way to add roads without using the console?

  Hello, leitsu-

  Yes, it is possible with PowerCLI.  Take a look at the New-VMHostRoute cmdlet.

• Problems when adding static routes to esxi 5.5 c

  Hello

  I read this KB on adding static routes:http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 2001426

  But I'm unable to add static routes to my esxi 5.5. host. am I missing something here?

  ~ # esxcfg - road - l

  VMkernel itineraries:

  Interface of network gateway subnet mask

  10.238.187.0 255.255.255.0 subnet local vmk0

  10.238.188.0 255.255.255.0 subnet local vmk1

  by default 0.0.0.0 10.238.187.1 vmk0

  ~ # esxcli network ip route add - 10.238.188.1 - network 10.238.188.0/24 gateway ipv4

  In double track 10.238.188.0/24 found in the network.  Please remove first the old road.

  Kindly help.

  You cannot add a new gateway for a subnet exists in the vmkernel as you can't have two default gateway.

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• Subinterface-vlan-static route

  I tried the static route to the network 192.168.0.0/29 and 192.168.0.8/29. The result is PC1 still does not see PC3

  request: PC1 ping PC3 successful /vlan2

  photo here:

  Hello levantriet2881,

  I'm confused as to what you're asking.  On what router you add static routes, and what looked like the roads?  PC1 is unable to ping PC3?  But can ping to PC2?  Ping PC3 PC2 does What look like on each router's routing tables?  What is the configuration of uplink on the switch port look like?  Certainly need more information levantriet2881.

• Add a static route to a RV042

  I have configured the RV042 dual WAN port for backup smart link connected to two different ISPS.  The subnet behind this is 192.168.2.xxx.  I have a second router linksys Garland with the 192.168.2.250 WAN port and subnet behind it is 192.168.20.xxx.  My problem is that I have a not able to route traffic fron 192.168.2.xxx to 192.168.20.xxx.  How can I add a static route so that clients on 192.168.2.xxx can access resources on 192.168.20.xxx?

  1. the second Linksys router must be changed of gateway (active NAT) in router mode (NAT disabled) mode. With NAT the LAN behind the second Linksys will be not accessible from the outside unless you configure port forwarding.

  2. on the RV042 set up a static route for the subnet 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 to the gateway IP address 1921.68.2.250 on the LAN interface.

  3. Ideally, you must configure the same static route on all clients connected to the RV042. If you don't want to do this, you must configure the firewall on all clients on the RV042 accept ICMP redirect messages. This is important because otherwise all traffic from 192.168.2. * to * 192.168.20 would be sent to the RV042 and from there to the second Linksys that is unnecessary and could create a bottleneck.

• static routing in SMV problem

  This problem may seem out of place in this forum, but I think that the problem is specific to XP virtual machines in ESX. The same issue has not been seen in a similar setup running under XP hosted in ESXi.

  I invited XP with multiple network cards configured. A NETWORK adapter is connected to a 10.4.0.0 network with a 255.254.0.0 mask, which means it's supposed to handle all the traffic 10.4.X.X and 10.5.X.X. However, I have another NIC that is connected to 10.5.217.0 with a 255.255.255.0 network mask. XP runs without problem. I can access 10.5.217.X traffic to the correct interface and all traffic on the 10.4.X.X traffic and 10.5.X.X on the appropriate interface.

  The problem appears when I try to access another network on the 10.5.217.X interface. The other network is 10.5.195.0. I add a static route to 10.5.195.0 to use the address of a default gateway of 10.5.217.1. This does not work because XP has chosen to use the 10.4.0.0 interface, even if I ping the 10.5.217.1 router directly. I try again and this time I specify the interface 10.5.217.X and now I can access the 10.5.195.0 network through the appropriate interface. This will work until the XP guest is restarted. After that, the XP customer returns to use interface 10.4.X.X for the 10.5.195.0 network and who doesn't.

  In ESXi, a reboot of the XP client did not cause the routing back to another interface, while I see this behavior in ESX.

  First of all, it's a bad network with overlap configuration.

  Put good metric for this route, so it would come first in the routing table.

  ---

  VMware vExpert 2009

  http://blog.vadmin.ru

• Static routing LRT214 does not

  Hello

  I have a hard time with a static routing on LRT214.

  My configuration:

  * LRT214 (recently purchased), acting as a gateway to the internet, local subnet is 192.168.28.0/24

  * There is a local VPN (192.168.28.98) server on the local network, serving a LAN tunnel with subnet 192.168.29.0/24. on LRT214 port forwarding is configured

  I can connect to my VPN server on the internet, and I can access the machine running on the VPN server (for example via ssh).

  However, I can not connect to any other computer on my LAN, although I tried

  adding another subnet under Configuration > network > LAN settings

  * setting up a static route under Setup > Advanced Routing (kind of route add - net 192.168.29.0/24 gw 192.168.28.98)

  of course, when I add the itinerary of statitc over any computer on the local network, I can connect via VPN tunnel to the machine, so its clearly a problem of LRT214.

  Please help, how can I configure a static route for this scenario in the user Web interface?

  The SPI Firewall, intercept traffic.

  As far as I understand, it could be that when the VPN server sends data to another machine on the local network, this happens on layer 2 (where the SPI Firewall not listening), while the return on the VPN server traffic is routed higher up in the stack, where the SPI listening and intercept.

  So, I will use the above workarounds, or put the OpenVPN server on a different subnet or VLAN, which I do anyway. I tried a basic configuration of VLAN yesterday (just put the Server full VPN with all interfaces in one VLAN separated), with InterVLAN routing enabled, but there seems to be some particularities with it (like the ping works, but not ssh). In any case, it's another story. Thanks for you support.

• Static routing question

  I just took a WRT610N and configure a few static routes for my network.

  I have the router connected to a cable modem WAN and the interface of local network connected to my LAN via 192.168.0.1.

  I have three other LAN subnets in a test environment, they are:-

  172.16.0.0/24

  172.16.100.0/24

  172.16.200.0/24

  I tried to add the following to the first subnet:

  Destination = 172.16.0.0 LAN IP address

  Subnet mask = 255.255.255.0

  Gateway = 172.16.0.1

  Interface = LAN

  No matter what I try, I get a message saying route static invalid, and I can't get anything to stick.  Everyone can't see what I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you guys!

  Gary

  The IP address of the gateway in a static route is the IP address of the connected device directly on each side of the router, either on the ethernet LAN or WAN side.

  In particular you cannot route a subnet of an IP address of the gateway inside the target IP subnet. The static route example you deposited directions where to send traffic destined to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0. It is impossible to set the address of the gateway as 172.16.0.1 because the router doesn't know where to send the traffic to 172.16.0.1.

  In other words, the IP address of the gateway must in most cases be a 192.168.0. * IP address that you use these IP addresses in the local network of the WRT. The IP address of the gateway should be the IP address of the router on the subnet specific target within your local network.

  For example, if your second router with address 172.16.0.1/255.255.255.0 IP LAN has an IP 192.168.0.2, then the 192.168.0.2 is the IP address of the gateway for the static route to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0.

• Remove the static route by default

  Hello

  I have a switch L3 which has a static default route pointing to a FW that is connected to a circuit of the Internet. The same L3 switch made EIGRP routers on our MPLS network. If this default static route disappears EIGRP will inject a default route, and users will receive their Internet traffic through the MPLS cloud as a backup.

  My question is how to remove this static road by default with a mechanism that is unique on the Internet circuit. I can't count on line protocol because it almost never goes down. I can't rely on Internet ping IP SLA addresses because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop of the SLA of intellectual property.

  I wish I could do BGP with the Internet provider but this circuit is in a country where it would be difficult.

  Any ideas on how to remove this default static route based on something that is unique to this tour of the Internet.

  Thank you

  P.

  "I can't rely on Internet addresses ping IP SLA because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop IP SLA."

  To remedy this situation, you must add a route with the 'permanent' switch at the end of any IP you track on your IPSLA... In this way, if this interface is down, your ping IPSLA would stop and IPSLA would be the move and change your default route.

  Example:

  Route IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 Permanent

  where 1.1.1.1 is the IP address, you are followed and 2.2.2.2 is your 'usual' default gateway

• The scenario that is balanced with two static routes without remote administration.

  Hello

  I'm setting up a switch 3750 PSI using MHSRP provider on the side. In fact I use two GigaEthernet connections.

  I want to create my side by using the static routes of load balancing, but traffic flows that I see are not identical or similar.

  See the router # running | Start iproute

  [...]

  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.1
  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.6

  [...]

  Router # show ip route

  [...]
  S * 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.0.254
  10.0.0.0/16 is variably divided into subnets, subnets 23, 5 masks
  10.0.0.0/16 S [1/0] via 10.255.255.6
  [1/0] via 10.255.255.1

  [...]

  Either way, ip cef is already activated

  Here is the result:

  Interface 1

  GigabitEthernet1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)

  [...]

  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 35046000 bps, 4638 packets/s
  5 minute output rate 8671000 bps, 3846 packets/s

  Interface 2

  GigabitEthernet2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  [...]
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 1000 bps, 2 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 3859000 bps, 1714 packets/s

  IP CEF:

  router ip cef #show
  Interface of the jump following the prefix
  10.0.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 Vlan99
  10.255.255.6 Vlan99

  I have no configuration is no longer on the interfaces. I would add the ip per instruction packet load balancing?

  By default cef uses per load balancing destination, set ip load balancing by package on the concert links try again, are your equal to up to 10 links network on each side

• RV082 static routing

  I have a router RV082, and I added a route static (on the advanced routing section), but the screen "routing table" doesn't show the road, so obviously static routing does not work on the computers in my network. I tried to disable the DHCP server did not work. Can someone help me?

  Thank you

  PD. I enclose the screens.

  If the static route will not save in the routing table, it is possible, you have a defective unit.  If you add to the list and save it on the bottom of the screen and it will not be displayed on the routing table, then you need call the HWC to 1866-606-1866 and let them take a look at the router.

• Adding static route to the ACS

  How can I add a static route to my device SE ACS?

  I try to get AAA works on a Cisco 871 is an end of distance of a vpn s2s ASA to 871. On the router, I use as the source for Ganymede interface vlan1.

  My ACS server is on the subnet for my ASA management, but the GBA to the Remote LAN road is via its default gateway and interface from the INSIDE of the SAA. I need to get the traffic of Ganymede ACS to return through the management interface of ASA.

  Thanks in advance.

  John

  John,

  There is no way to set a static route in the GBA unit. The only network settings, you can set are the ip address/subnet, default gateway and dns servers.

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

  Please mark it is resolved so other can benefit from

• Next hop for the static route on the VPN site to site ASA?

  Hi all

  I would be grateful if someone could help me with my problem ASA/misunderstanding. I have a VPN site-to site on a SAA. I want to add a floating static route to point to the VPN on the ASA. Note that the traffic in this way is not with in subnets cryptographic ACL that is used to bring up the VPN. This VPN is used only as a backup.

  The static route with the next hop add local public address or the remote public address of the VPN? The next break maybe local ASA isp internet facing interface? I intend to do on the ASDM. I'm sorry if it's a simple question but I found no material that explains this?

  Concerning

  Ahh, ok, makes sense.

  The next hop should be the next jump to the interface that ends the VPN connection, essentially the same as your Internet connection / outside the next hop interface.

  Example of topology:

  Site B (outside interface - 1.1.1.1) - (next hop: 1.1.1.2) Internet

  The static route must tell:

  outdoor 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.2 200

  I hope this helps.

• AnyConnect customers not to follow the internal static routes on ASA5505

  I just bought an ASA 5505 for my remote access to our internal network users.  I followed all the installation instructions, that I can find.  I am able to establish a VPN connection by using the Anyconnect client and can see some of my internal network. (In fact, only the subnet of the interface internal)  However, I have several subnets inside of my LAN which are then sent by another switch inside my LAN.  I have built in the correct static routes so that the ASA will send traffic to this internal routing for all subnets switch doesn't do not part of it is inside the subnet of the interface.  I can see and ping these subnets of the SAA itself but the AnyConnect client cannot.  Any suggestions on how to solve this problem would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  Please, add these lines and give it a try:

  inside_nat0_outbound list of permitted access 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed inside_nat0_outbound 203.250.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 172.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 allow 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 210.105.0.0 255.255.0.0 allow 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Kind regards

  Note the useful messages!

  Julio