Addition of tablespace Data Guard env has warned.

Similar Questions

• How to reduce the temp tablespace data file

  Dear all,
  
  I'm using Oracle 11 g on Windows 2003. Due to a SQL select query my temp tablespace data file size has increased significantly. How can I reduce the data temp file?
  
  Thank you

  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/tspaces007.htm#CFHJFBBJ

• How to Setup Data Guard with alter tablespace... begin backup approach

  Hello!
  
  I am writing this compilation of documents in a guard daata establishing in 10g. I was in charge to present different approaches in implementing on Rhel 5.
  
  I came across 3 procedures (which is to duplicate a database with RMAN, then configure it to a Data Guard feature). I read a process using (let's this is what the article said, but procedure was presented):
  
  alter tablespace... .begin backup;
  alter tablespace... .end backup;
  
  then copy the generated files and configure it to the data protection feature.
  
  Someone help it with that? Is there like a blogsite or steps I can take for this scenario?

  Hello;

  The best I found was: (and its same 10 Oracle! and not RMAN.)

  http://sites.Google.com/site/catchdba/physical-standby-database-using-HOTBackup

  There, an old link here on this topic:

  DataGuard configuration using hot backup files

  Hard to find much on this topic as "Hot Backup" almost always comes to RMAN.

  This collection of notes can also help:

  DataGuard knowledge browser Product Page [ID 267955.1]

  And the "Formidable" Powerpoint:

  www.dbspecialists.com/files/presentations/standbydb.ppt

  Seems that this method is dead somewhere between Oracle 8 and Oracle 9

  Best regards

  mseberg

  Published by: mseberg on March 16, 2012 20:31

• Additional logging with Oracle 10 g 2 streams and Data Guard

  Hello
  
  I have a physical environment with DB Oracle 10 g 2 and Standby with Data Guard DR CONF. At the present time, this environment will be extended to a pattern of replication using 2-way Oracle Streams Replication (for replication to the central office of this branch, other channels will be added soon). The primary DB is replicated to the other primary DB (at the telephone exchange remotely).
  
  So, there's my question: it is completely necessary to specify an additional record on data sources (primary) to set the 2-way Streams replication? and, if it is completely necessary, then, can configure additional connection on primary without affecting their physical Standby, or what I have to do something special?
  
  Thanks in advance.

  Yes, for the streams you need additional registration. There is no impact on databases physical standby.

• The Oracle has EM package for monitoring Data guard

  I need to know if a EM supervisory package Dataguard Oracle, that's our SSO database that is replicated through Data guard

  Hello

  It can control and you can click on a button in MS do the switchover - it is fully integrated.

  Don't know what 'pack' it is considered part of the property... or if you have some of them, without needing extra licenses - not sure.

  See you soon,.

  Rich

• Data Guard archive political deletion log

  Hi all

  I configured the data guard with 2 bases Eve in oracle 11g.

  I want to use rman to delete archives on all servers.

  I have configured no FRA, no recovery catalog.

  My question is:

  If I delete waiting til sequence # 1627 and on primary sequence til = # = 1620 or vice versa this would cause problems for Data Guard.

  I say delete until the different sequences # on primary and standby cause problems for synchronization?

  Thank you

  So if I understand delete archivelog to sysdate - or delete archivelog all completed before sysdate n is not the archivelog deletion policy you put on RMAN?

  She depends on it. The note was made at the base of the MOS document how ensure that RMAN is NOT delete archived logs that have not yet shipped to standby mode (Doc ID 394261.1)

  Delete archivelog to sysdate - depends on all of the deletion policy. If the deletion policy is set on "applied pending all", then it does not delete the archives, if they are not applied on the day before. If the deletion policy is set to none, then it does not check if the archive is applied on the eve and deletes them directly.

  Last Archive generated on primary:

  SYS@oraprim > select max(sequence#) from v$ archived_log;

  MAX(SEQUENCE#)

  --------------

  114

  Last check-in applied in mode ensures:

  SYS@orastb > select max(sequence#) from v$ archived_log in case of application = 'YES ';

  MAX(SEQUENCE#)

  --------------

  109

  Delete policy set to NONE on primary:

  RMAN > show archivelog deletion policy;

  using the control file of the target instead of recovery catalog database

  RMAN settings for database with db_unique_name ORAPRIM are:

  CONFIGURE THE NONE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY;

  RMAN > delete archivelog until 'sysdate;

  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1

  channel ORA_DISK_1: SID = 60 type of device = DISK

  List copies of newspapers archived to database with db_unique_name ORAPRIM

  =====================================================================

  Thrd Seq S key low time

  ------- ---- ------- - ---------

  110-1-214 A JANUARY 13, 16

  Name: +FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_110.318.901050727

  216-1-111 A JANUARY 13, 16

  Name: +FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_111.317.901050731

  217-1-112 A JANUARY 13, 16

  Name: +FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_112.316.901050731

  113. OF 1 219 A 13 JANUARY 16

  Name: +FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_113.315.901050733

  222 1 114 A JANUARY 13, 16

  Name: +FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_114.314.901050737

  You sure you want to delete the items above (enter YES or NO)? NO.

  It is the removal of primary archives that have not yet been applied on the eve.

  Delete policy 'APPLIES ON STANDBY ALL' value on the primary:

  RMAN > show archivelog deletion policy;

  RMAN settings for database with db_unique_name ORAPRIM are:

  CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO APPLIED ON ALL STANDBY;

  RMAN > delete archivelog until 'sysdate;

  output channel: ORA_DISK_1

  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1

  channel ORA_DISK_1: SID = 60 type of device = DISK

  RMAN-08120: WARNING: log archived not deleted, not yet applied watch

  Archive log file name=+FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_110.318.901050727 thread = 1 sequence = 110

  RMAN-08120: WARNING: log archived not deleted, not yet applied watch

  Archive log file name=+FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_111.317.901050731 thread = 1 sequence = 111

  RMAN-08120: WARNING: log archived not deleted, not yet applied watch

  Archive log file name=+FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_112.316.901050731 thread = 1 sequence = 112

  RMAN-08120: WARNING: log archived not deleted, not yet applied watch

  Archive log file name=+FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_113.315.901050733 thread = 1 sequence = 113

  RMAN-08120: WARNING: log archived not deleted, not yet applied watch

  Archive log file name=+FRA/oraprim/archivelog/2016_01_13/thread_1_seq_114.314.901050737 thread = 1 sequence = 114

  It checks if the archive has been applied on the day before. As the 110 to 114 sequence is not applied in the waiting, the archives are not deleted on the primary.

  Hope that gives you a clear picture of how it works.

  -Jonathan Rolland

• Database is configured for Data Guard

  I'm lance a UTF8 conversion on a development database, which has been cloned from Data Guard. There is a warning in the Migration status: "database is configured for Data Guard" which is looking at DMU to determine this? The database is opened in read-write mode and it behaves like a primary database (I have the MISP scanner and run updates to address representations not valid). I would like to know what I need to update the settings.

  This prevent me to convert tables using DEC? When I try to select this option for all tables I get the message, "CDS does not support conversion method"Copy data using CREATE TABLE AS SELECT"for tables that are involved in a process like capture Oracle Streams, or apply.". Another method of conversion available for the table.

  Thank you

  Ben

  CDS checks if the DG_BROKER_START parameter is set to true.

  The problem with the ETG is independent of the Data Guard. The CDS is true for tables which:

  -are asynchronous stream capture source, or

  -update conflict managers have, or

  -DML managers have, or

  -conflict resolution settings have

  The above tables are considered to be configured for Oracle Streams and are not supported by the method of conversion of DEC. This is because the DEC method creates a copy converted the table and falls from the original. The CDS is not able to move the configuration information from the old table to the new flow.

  Thank you

  Sergiusz

• steps for Data Guard with a primary eve and 2

  Hello
  
  Database: 10.2.0.4, 11.2.0.1
  Operating system: Windows, Unix
  
  A > primary database
  B > database ensures 1
  C > database ensures 2
  
  I want to configure * 2 Eve * databases for the single primary database.
  Allows to take, A, B and C are my machines. My Data Guard configuration will be like, * archive logs will be mobile * A to B and A to C.
  
  If I do all passage between and B , now that b is primary and remaining has and C are pending data bases. At this point also, Archives of the newspapers should move from B to A and B to C. In addition, even should arrive from C to A and C to B, if I make the passage between B and C. If all goes well, then I'll do switchback to the main database (A) primary.
  
  How should I mention PFILE in all machines , parameters like
  LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1 = LOCATION = < PATH > - LOCAL path ARCHIVE
  LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 = SERVICE =
  LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_3 = SERVICE =
  FAL_SERVER =
  FAL_CLIENT =
  STANDBY_FILE_MANAGEMENT =
  
  In my tnsnames.ora , primary, standby1 standby2 my service entrances and are even in all of my machines.
  
  Please suggest me, how can configure my pfiles in machines?
  
  Thank you
  Therese

  Please don't forget to update the thread with useful or correct, if you find the answer either.

  Kind regards
  SQuadri

• Mixed version Clusterware in Data Guard configuration

  I currently have a primary database RAC with physical relief RAC database with the database to 10.2.0.4 and Clusterware versions. I intend to move the entire stack to 11 GR 2 finally. My window of failure is limited, I plan on upgrading the Clusterware to 11.2.0.1.2 in a breakdown and the database in a second failure.
  
  To mitigate risk, I plan on upgrading the physical relief of Clusterware cluster version before the main cluster. This will give me confidence and timing to repeat on the main cluster.
  
  The resulting configuration will be: -.
  
  Main cluster: -.
  10.2 Clusterware/ASM/listener
  10.2 database
  
  Cluster relief: -.
  Clusterware/ASM/listener 11.2
  10.2 database
  
  Can you see any problems with this please? Other that a process of LNS 10.2 on the principal should communicate with a listener 11.2 (RFS process), I don't see why it wouldn't work.

  In general, it should not any matter having a rescue system with different version of ASM and GI, since this has nothing to do with what needs the Data Guard. Your hope is so correct.

  However, there are some problems with the 10.2 clusterware 11 GR 2 and databases:

  Please check the MOS score: 948456,1 pre 11.2 questions Database 11 GR 2 Infrastructure grid environment

  As you can see in this note, this unfortunately requires patches in 10.2 as well House...

  In addition, take care if your third disc with voting rights is based NFS. It is best to remove it before upgrading clusterware (has had a problem with that).
  Also if you have some VIPs created for your own applications (not the VIP of the oracle, they are o.k. delete them.) I've heard talk about problem trying to upgrade a cluster containing self creates some VIPs.

  Good luck. And if you encounter problems during the update let me know...

  Sebastian

• 11g R2 RAC OneNode vs Active Data Guard

  Hello
  
  I just read on the new Oracle RAC one node but ddont get the difference to the active data guard.
  
  "RAC OneNode offers another possibility: an additional way to fight against the consolidation with one instance of RAC running on a node in a cluster." Oracle calls its strategy a "Maximum Availability Architecture" - when a customer adds redundancy, the database can use it for additional performance. Active Data Guard allows customers to move backup and redundant reports to the machines. "
  
  Source: http://www.b-eye-network.com/blogs/adrian/archives/2009/11/
  
  maximum availability architecture, is not the custodian of data?
  
  concerning
  metalray

  >
  Is it scalability... only. Apart from this. A blog has been linked that says 'Extended RAC'.
  Why should I use RAC for the filesystem of database if they are on a San in any case - assuming the SAN extends to different places? It seems to be that a good SAN makes the idea of 'Extended RAC' a bit useless.
  >

  If you already have a San that "extends to different places", you have protection against disaster with that if you put your data files on it, this is true even for a single instance respectively a one RAC node configuration.

  In both cases, you only have a single instance active - in other words, a single server can be used to service your needs of the user. With a true - in this case 'Extended' CARS, you can have multiple servers at the same time access to your data that is stretched across your San as your needs of the service user.

  In short: If you want to have the only disaster protection, you are served already with your stretched SAN - as long as it extends to a large enough distance.

  An extended RAC is not useless, however, because the cab is more than high availability.

  Kind regards
  Uwe Hesse

  http://uhesse.WordPress.com

• Oracle 10g RAC + ASM + Data Guard: Question on the new disk group.

  Hello
  
  One of our clients is to have Oracle 10 g RAC + ASM + Data Guard. Database is the disk DATA_DG1 group and FRA is on FLASH_DG1. Data Guard is a single instance on ASM.
  
  To add more space, we can create another disc of the Group DATA_DG2 on Prod ASM and Data Guard ASM env, replication continues without any problem. Will be archiving logs shipped to the second disk DATA_DG2 group and applied without any configuration changes?
  
  Rgds,

  Yes, it sounds great.

  You should be fine with the implementation of these measures and the dataguard should continue on as usual.

  Just make sure that you are dealing with a physical standby that has not the conerts file name defined.

• RMAN 11g Active Data Guard

  I just built my first Active Data Guard 11g... Well, the next thing to do is the RMAN part.
  At this point, I want to know:
  (A) Comment / what you ask that a newspaper has been applied on the side of the eve
  (B) how RMAN knows what has been applied
  (C) if I do the RMAN backup side the day before, won't be there always some difference because there is always some delay between the primary and Standby?

  I assume you mean with RMAN to delete the archive logs? If the newspaper was not delivered and applied to the day before still wont RMAN delete, instead, it displays the following error:

  RMAN-08137: WARNING: log archiving not deleted because it is still necessary

  Until the newspaper has been applied on the eve, this intelligence is built in to 11G (10 g you need a parameter of '_' to get this to work).

  Thank you
  Paul

• Cost for Data Guard

  Hello, we are running Oracle on a license of the company, running on Linux and Windows hosts. Can someone tell me if there is an extra charge for Data Guard? Thank you. P.S. I am a newbie.

  If you are using DataGuard, data pending is active and running and archived application papers (at least this is the case for 99% of the installation of the system). Under the terms of the current default value to the license agreement basis, I believe that this requires that sleep is allowed. If you copied everything simply newspapers archived on a standby server where Oracle has been installed, but never really ran, I think you can get away with not license that as soon as the day before was active within 10 days a year. Of course, when you do not want to activate it, you must wait for it to apply a bunch of do it again until he could be open to users. If you copied a new backup on the machine to sleep periodically, you can probably keep the number of archived logs that are to be applied to a reasonable level, but you pay of course with the inconvenience and additional scripts work rather than simply backup server licenses.

  Of course, it's one of those terms that are more likely to be the subject of negotiations. Especially if you have a credible alternative architecture that avoids the eve (a cluster, HACMP or Oracle FailSafe), you might well be able to get a break on licenses pending license.

  Justin

• Using Oracle 11 g Data Guard disaster recovery

  Hi, can anyone answer if Oracle 11 g Data Guard by itself provides an option for making/switch between the main bases and emergency (back and forth) disaster and as a restoration solution, seamlessly? Here's the scenario:

  1. two databases (active and reserve)

  2 put it to sleep (make primary with read/write)

  3. restore to the original database

  Data Guard has two transitions of role... Failover and the digital switchover.

  Passage to the fact exactly what you describe. You can switch to standby and vice versa. However, this will not work unless the primary and the standby are available. If you will not be able to perform an operation of swichover when you have a failure in the main data center that makes the primary db not available.

  Failover will be the day before in a primary for the moments where the primary origin is not available. Unlike the digital switchover, failover is one-way. There is no 'restoration' of failover. If you do not failover, then once the old Center of main data is operational again and you can get the former primary database up, you must restore from the first news and make a watch for the first new. At this point, you can then make a pass to come back and run in the original data center.

  HTH,

  Brian

• Data Guard - allocation of licenses and other fundamental questions before setting it up.

  Hi all

  Please allow me to submit some questions about Oracle Data Guard.

  There are 2 databases 'authorized and ready ':

  -a single instance of the "alfa", Oracle Enterprise Edition 10.2 database,

  -"bravo", Oracle 10.2 Enterprise Edition, Real Application Clusters database

  I have to "align" congratulations to alfa on a daily basis, so that--in case of failure of the main 'alfa' site - recovery is possible change to the site "bravo."

  (1) even if we can afford a loss of data corresponding to the period little uttered at the end of the last daily alignment (no need to 'transactional' alignment between the two databases), I assume that the best approach to meet this need in terms of efficiency and manageability consists on two databases including in a Data Guard configuration.

  Am I wrong?

  (2) in particular, the physical implementation of the standby database must be preferred over logic, because that "simpler and faster" in this case. Am I wrong?

  (3) only the Data Guard configuration require

  (a) additional licenses?

  (b) additional material/software resources for host machines?

  (5) the release of two databases must be equal to the specific to the component version number (10.2.0.1, for example)? Or, for example, is a 10.2.0.1 able to work with a 10.2.0.3 db db in the Data Guard configuration?

  Thank you very much in advance!

  Marco mazzocchi

  Hello

  (1) even if we can afford a loss of data corresponding to the period little uttered at the end of the last daily alignment (no need to 'transactional' alignment between the two databases), I assume that the best approach to meet this need in terms of efficiency and manageability consists on two databases including in a Data Guard configuration.

  Am I wrong?

  You have reason, physical hosting it good thing. For the most part, you will get impact with until or unless data loss because of some problems of network (or a configuration problem)

  (2) in particular, the physical implementation of the standby database must be preferred over logic, because that "simpler and faster" in this case. Am I wrong?

  Logical standby is a little different from the physical standby mode

  (3) only the Data Guard configuration require

  (a) additional licenses?

  (b) additional material/software resources for host machines?

  Data features come with Enterprise Edition - perhaps for the active database "cost of the additional license.

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/license.112/e47877/editions.htm#DBLIC109

  (5) the release of two databases must be equal to the specific to the component version number (10.2.0.1, for example)? Or, for example, is a 10.2.0.1 able to work with a 10.2.0.3 db db in the Data Guard configuration?

  Good level to maintain the same level of oracle binaries / patches and still the support of heterogeneous DG

  -Pavan Kumar N