Address no. E3000 ISP on WAN

Similar Questions

• WRT54G V3 Firmware 4.30.12 - router not pick an IP address from my ISP

  I have a wrt54g with the 4.30.12 firmware V3.   The problem is that I can't get an IP wan to my ISP.   Can I connect my PC to the modem and it receives an address very well.   I tried to release renew to invite the router to get a new address which did not work.   I missed my router to the factory, which did not work.   This router worked fine until about 4 weeks ago, when this problem started intermittently.   Now, he gets all a WAN address.

  Can someone help with this problem?

  Thank you

  I found the problem.   I rebooted the router and the modem cable.  Once the modem and the router came up, I plugged the router to the modem.  He then received an IP address via DHCP from the cable provider.

  I discovered the cable of the company does not release the IP address that the modem is rebooted.   I had to restart in the sequence of the cable modem first, and then once it came I rebooted the router.  Once the router came I plugged the two and the router has got a new IP address.

  Thanks for your help.

• Only 1 of the 2 computers in my LAN recognizes my static IP address assigned by my ISP - HELP!

  I have an IP address from my ISP, but only one of the two computers in my LAN presents this static IP address in the "ipconfig" and it connects to the internet, the other computer Watch has "169.254.XXX.XXX' IP address and does not connect to the internet.  How can I fix it? I don't know much about the TCP/IP settings.  OS is XP Pro SP3.  I have a DSL router from single port connected to a simple switch 5 ports, then two CAT5 cables will switch on both computers.

  Thanks for your help!

  derisk

  Hello

  Two computers cannot connect to the same connection using the same IP address. Each computer on the network must have its own unique IP address.

  You need to get a cable/DSL router. Configure the WAN port (Internet) side with your static IP address and connect all the computers the and other equipment network on the side of the router LAN.

  Generally, it looks like this, http://www.ezlan.net/network/router.jpg

  P.S. You don't need to use the wireless if you do not, it is very difficult to find a new wireless router.

  Jack-MVP Windows Networking. WWW.EZLAN.NET

• Research by ASA & ISP address space

  Hi all

  Maybe a stupid question. One of my clients planning on creating RDP access to some servers sitting on 'Inside' of ASA5510. Customer asked pulic ISP 24 address space and had a 1.1.1.0/24 (ips changed). In addition, ISP customer provided with ASA ouside I / f IP: 2.2.2.2/30 and default gateway for ASA (modem Internet service providers) such as 2.2.2.1/30.

  So what is the best way to use the ISP assigned public IPs to provide RDP access to servers on the inside... ? Can I assign 1.1.1.1/24 to ASA inside and can create a "No. NAT' to access internet and RDP.

  Or I thought initially to have NAT with ip pvt in-house system (wasn't aware of public ip address space required). So is it possible using the same ip address space pvt and assigned/24 ip addresses to create Internet/RDP access?

  Help for config links is appreciated.

  Thank you inadvance

  MS

  "I thought initially to have NAT with ip pvt in-house system (wasn't aware of public ip address space request)." Is it so possible using the same pvt ip address space and assigned/24 ip addresses to create Internet/RDP

  access? "

  Upsolutely possible and the best to do as you have thought about it.

  If I understand correctly: Please correct me otherwise!

  1. you have ASA5510, outside of the interface with the IP public 2.2.2.2/30

  2 - ISP router with IP 2.2.2.1/30

  Gives 3 - Customer ISP 254 public IP addresses using client on another beach 1.1.1.0/24

  Well, you can do the following if you do not have inside the configured IP interface.

  1 - ASA5510 inside can be any subnet ip to any of the reserved private beaches. For your inside interface you can use one of the below private beaches.

  i 10.0.0.0 through 10.255.255.255

  II - 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255

  III - 192.168.0.0 to 192.168.255.255

  Assume that you have inside the 172.16.1.1/24 interface

  If you have:

  ASA5510 outside interface IP: 2.2.2.2/30

  ASA5510 inside the interface IP: 172.16.1.1/24

  for your ISP services new public IP range just create your one-to-one NAT in ASA5510

  translations by using the new IP address of the ISP. Note that the ISP should route the new public IP address space to your ASA5510 outside interface, Im sure they know that.

  As said, just create your static nat using the new public IP address, you can also create

  If necessary global nat pools.

  for example RDP access from outside with the public IP 1.1.1.100 coordinated to 172.16.1.50 PC inside the host

  static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.100 172.16.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0

  outside_access_in list access permit tcp any host 1.1.1.100 eq 3389

  Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside

  for example, creating additional pools of global variables using the new IP PAT range.

  Global 1.1.1.50 - 1.1.1.74 2 (outdoor)

  Global (outside) 2 1.1.1.75

  Rgds

  Jorge

• L2l VPN between ASA with the IP address public and CISCO2911 behind the ISP router with port forwarding

  Hi all

  My apologies if this is a trivial question, but I spent considerable time trying to search and had no luck.

  I encountered a problem trying to set up a temporary L2L VPN from a Subscriber with CISCO2911 sitting behind the router of the ISP of an ASA. ISP has informed that I can't ignore their device and complete the circuit Internet on the Cisco for a reason, so I'm stuck with it. The Setup is:

  company 10.1.17.1 - y.y.y.y - router Internet - z.z.z.z - ISP - LAN - 10.x.x.2 - XXX1 - ASA - 10.1.17.2 - CISCO2911 - 10.1.15.1 LAN

  where 10.x.x.x is a corporate LAN Beach private network, y.y.y.y is a public ip address assigned to the external interface of the ASA and the z.z.z.z is the public IP address of the ISP router.

  I have forwarded ports 500, 4500 and ESP on the ISP router for 10.1.17.2. The 2911 config attached below, what I can't understand is what peer IP address to configure on the SAA, because if I use z.z.z.z it will be a cause of incompatibility of identity 2911 identifies himself as 10.1.17.2...

  ! ^ ^ ^ ISAKMP (Phase 1) ^ ^ ^!
  crypto ISAKMP policy 5
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  isakmp encryption key * address no.-xauth y.y.y.y

  ! ^ ^ ^ IPSEC (Phase 2) ^ ^ ^!
  crymap extended IP access list
  IP 10.1.15.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA 3rd-esp esp-sha-hmac
  card crypto 1 TUNNEL VPN ipsec-isakmp
  defined peer y.y.y.y
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match the address crymap

  Gi0/2 interface
  card crypto VPN TUNNEL

  Hello

  debug output, it seems he's going on IPSEC States at the tunnel of final bud QM_IDLE's.

  What I noticed in your configuration of ASA box, it's that you're usig PFS but not on 2911 router.

  So I suggest:

  no card crypto OUTSIDE_map 4 don't set pfs <-- this="" will="" disable="" pfs="" on="" asa="">

  Then try tunnel initiate.

  Kind regards

  Jan

• WRT320N cannot not get IP address - using only 1 - no internet access - wired port hang web configuration pages

  You just bought Linksys WRT320N as a replacement for Netgear MR814.

  Cannot connect to internet using Linksys WRT320N.

  Installation program:

  ISP: Cox Communications (cable)

  Firmware: v1.0.03 build 010 July 24, 2009

  1 Wired - port 1 - for Windows XP SP 3 Dell Desktop

  Attempts to install:

  1 tried to set up using the installation CD.  Spread the slightest error with error 302: internal error. tried this 3 times

  2A through the reset, power off, procedures.

  3 Ping 192.168.1.1 = success

  4. connected to 192.168.1.1 via web browser

  5. set the MAC Address = MAC address of the computer

  6. the MTU value = Auto (1500).  Also tried manual 1492

  Could not get the IP address by using the version of IP address and IP address renew.  Address Internet IP still = 0.0.0.0

  Note that the web page will be still stuck after perfoming some actions (such as after switching between the tabs).  Message at the bottom of the browser is "Wating for http://192.168.1.1/Status_Router.asp.  And the hourglass on the screen away.

  Note that the old Netgear router still works fine and I am currently connected to the internet via the Netgear router.   I'd appreciate any help getting the new Linksys router connection/operation/obtaining of internet and IP address.

  Thanks for your help.

  I do not know where I was unclear: you wrote before you used the function of the cloning mac address on the WRT to clone the MAC address of the PC. In this way the WRT "pretended" to be the PC if you connect to the internet port WRT to your modem.

  However, the PC is not the device you used before you connect to the internet. The PC was not the device that was connected to the modem before. If you connect the computer directly to your modem it will either be an IP address. There will be no internet.

  The problem is that your ISP only allows you to have an active internet connection single at some point. If you plug in a different device with a different MAC address to your modem this device won't get an IP address. That you have connected the Netgear router to your modem and you have internet, then you need to clone the MAC address of the Netgear router. This is the device that is connected to your internet connection and it is the MAC address that your ISP has locked your internet connection.

  So, once again: clone the MAC address of the router netgear (internet or WAN port MAC address) of your Linksys router. Then the Linksys's router Netgear and your ISP should accept the Linksys router. The netgear router should have a status page in the web interface, showing you the right MAC address to be cloned.

• WRT160N: Getting dynamic IP address 169

  Hello!

  Linksys WRT160N, bought yesterday and I want it behaves same way did my Buffalo WHR-HP-G54. So I live in apartment building for students, and we don't have modems, just the RJ-45 ports in the wall. If I plug the cable directly from the wall of the network card in my computer, my computer receives the dynamic ip address from the ISP. With my Buffalo, I connected the ethernet to the WAN sa-port cable and changed the router in bridge mode. In this way, there was 4 other ports free for the other PC and of course wireless too much for the other PC. Each PC connected via the Buffalo had a dynamic ip address from ISP, up to five addresses, which is the limit of my ISP. I plugged the ethernet cable from the wall of WRT160N Internet port and disabled NAT, dynamic routing (RIP) and DHCP server on the router Linksys, so all my computers have addresses ip starting with 169. And when I plug the ethernet cable from the wall to a port other than Internet-port of Linksys, all computers get the correct IP addresses via a wireless cable. What is wrong, is at - it a setting I have not seen? Some setting that I can use Internet-port and have other 4 free ports for other devices and other devices can get dynamic IP from my ISP.

  Ignore the Scrooge. What he wrote has nothing to do with your problem.

  Unlike the Buffalo WHR the Linksys doesn't have a configuration option or switch to alternate between the 'bridge' and the router mode. The Linksys always uses the internet port on a different interface of the numbered ports. You can't fill.

  For example, if you want to 'bridge' with the Linksys is the configuration you already have when wiring from the outlet ports numbered, i.e. do not use the internet port. You will have to "give up" the internet port then. If you need more wired ports, you must connect a switch to the router.

• Multiple WAN + several VLAN = hair loss

  Hello world

  We have a block of IP addresses of our ISP and I am using one for a network of comments, but I can not understand how to configure.

  X 2 (ending with 150 WAN IP address) should feed WAN X 0 (VLAN 1), and

  X 2 (ending with 151 WAN IP address) should feed WAN X 0: V2 (VLAN 2).

  I have already created the sous-interface side LAN and VLAN works very well internally.  I just need to know what NAT rules (or rules of firewall or sorcerers, etc.), I need to enter to the above plan work.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  Policy NAT below should help you accomplish what plan to do:

  Original source: X 0 subnet
  Translated source: X 2 (IP WAN ending by 150)
  Original destination: all
  Translated destination: Original
  Original service: no
  Translation service: Original
  The source Interface: X 0
  Destination interface: X 1

  Original source: X 0: subnet V2
  Translated source: X 2 (IP WAN ending with 151)
  Original destination: all
  Translated destination: Original
  Original service: no
  Translation service: Original
  The source Interface: X 0: V2
  Destination interface: X 1

  #IWork4Dell

• Dual active/passive failover of ISP with static Nat on Cisco 1941

  Hello world

  I'm working on a configuration of a client and I have everything in place right now except the NAT' static ing.  The config fails during an ISP to another and track als and routes by default static weighted, the PAT rocking with course to each interface maps.  It is, is it possible to switch on the large amount of static NAT entries to the ISP of backup?  So far, everything I've read said no because you can have only one entry per ip/port combo, other than another configuration static NAT double server with a different IP address.  I just want to be sure before making my recommendations, all thoughts are greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Brandon

  In fact, you can also long as you use standard NAT ("ip nat inside source static") or not NVI ('ip nat static source') for your attackers. You apply the roadmap by the end of the static NAT statement to indicate which interface it should apply to. So, if you have something like this:

   ip access-list extended ACL_NAT permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 any ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP2 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/2 

  Using port 80/tcp for example, you can do this:

   ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 y.y.y.y 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 z.z.z.z 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP2 

  Just replace x.x.x.x with the LAN address of the machine that you are shipping y.y.y.y with the WAN address you are shipping on isps1 and z.z.z.z with the address of the ISP WAN you are shipping on ISP2. The static NAT will be conditional on the roadmap, at this point.

  This works with TCP, UDP, and IP forwarding, but does not require that you use an IPv4 address to your WAN address. For some reason, it does not work if you use an interface... so if you're using dynamic addresses, it will be more complicated.

• Redirect port on the router Cisco 881 can following the active WAN Interface

  Hello

  Is there a way to make the port Fowarding after the Active Wan Interface?

  In this case the port Fowarding only works when the interface is active is GigabitEthernet0/0

  Bureau3616 (config) # ip nat inside source tcp static 192.168.2.xxx 3389 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 3387

  If our ISP-1 failure on WAN-1 Interface GigabitEthernet0/0 switch to internet access automatically to ISP - 2 WAN-2 on GigabitEthernet0/1 but the port forwarding does not work because it is fixed to the other interface only and I is not the way to port forwarding follow the WAN an actress.

  Let me know please if anyone has an idea.

  It is a part of my config

  ! NAT configuration

  Bureau3616 (config) # ip nat inside source map route NAT-WAN1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

  Bureau3616 (config) # ip nat inside source map route NAT-WAN2 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload

  Bureau3616 (config) # NAT-WAN1 allowed 10 route map

  Ip address of Bureau3616 (config-route-map) # match 100

  Bureau3616 (config-route-map) # match interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  Bureau3616 (config-route-map) #exit

  Bureau3616 (config) # NAT-WAN2 allowed 10 route map

  Ip address of Bureau3616 (config-route-map) # match 100

  Bureau3616 (config-route-map) # match interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  Bureau3616 (config-route-map) #exit

  ! Port Fowarding configuration

  Bureau3616 (config) #ip avant-protocole nd

  Bureau3616 (config) # ip nat inside source tcp static 192.168.2.xxx 3389 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 3387

  Thank you!

  You can, but you can't use transfer based on the interface of the to do. It should be based on the address itself. It's fine if you have static addresses or reserved on your WAN interfaces, but pose a problem if the addresses are dynamic:

  ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.x 3389 1.1.1.1 3389 route-map NAT-WAN1ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.x 3389 2.2.2.2 3389 route-map NAT-WAN2

  Replace the address of your interface WAN1 and 2.2.2.2 with the address of your 1.1.1.1 WAN2 interface. Applying the road maps will work pretty much the same way as it does with your statements of overload. Each transmission NAT rule applies only to the traffic corresponding to rules of the road map.

• IP NAT Inside multiple ISP

  Hello

  I would ask if I have 2 IP address from the ISP 1 and 2 of the ISP block, I have 2 inside the NAT map to 1 a web server, lets say:

  100.0.0.10 (ip ISP 1) and 200.0.0.10 (ip 2 PSI) to map on my web server.

  My question is, lets say I have 2 default route (0.0.0.0/0) for both my ISP. How can I do plan road so if the customer comes ISP 1 and access NAT to my web server (100.0.0.10), then the response from my web server will return to isps1 and do not use ISP2?

  NAT - ask.png

  

  Hello

  As far as I understand, the OP is concerned about the HTTP response.  The OP need that traffic coming from isps1 back to isps1 and traffic from ISP2 goes back to ISP2. Idea of Richard to have the second IP address and a roadmap is the solution.

  IP addresses of the server

  192.168.1.2

  192.168.1.3

  Router config

  interface FastEthernet0/0/0
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
   the property policy intellectual-card WEB

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  IP 100.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
  NAT outside IP

  interface FastEthernet1/0
  IP 200.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
  NAT outside IP

  IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 100.0.0.2
  IP nat inside source 192.168.1.3 static 200.0.0.2

  access-list 20 allow 192.168.1.2
  access-list 30 allow 192.168.1.3

  WAN allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 20
  set ip next-hop 100.0.0.1

  WAN allowed 20 route map
  corresponds to the IP 30
  IP 200.0.0.1 jump according to the value

  **************************************

  It will be useful,

  Masoud

• Connections RV042G Dual WAN

  We are a Cisco DPC3825 provided by our ISP cable modem connection.  It has been configured to act as a switch only.  They provided us with 2 static IP addresses.

  When each WAN port is connected individually, all right.  I see the IP addresses on the respective WAN port, and it works fine.

  When I connect the two WAN ports to the modem at the same time, I see a large amount of traffic between the WAN ports, as indicated by the port LEDs, and the RV042G becomes totally inadmissible through its web interface.

  How can I get the RV042G working with two connected WAN ports?

  Hi Rory, I'm not sure that the CPD is designed to aggregate in this way traffic. I wouldn't be surprised if he made a loop network, especially if you see a lot of broadcast or multicast packets.

  The most typical deployment has usually 2 connections that are unique modems.  I would suspect your 2 static IP addresses are on the same subnet / block ip that the router do not know how to react to load balance this scenario since he's going to the same destination in turn causing a loop until resources are consumed.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV180 DHCP IPv4 client to work on the WAN interface?

  Hello

  Is it the customer Cisco RV180 router/firewall support DHCP on WAN interface? What is specifically mentioned on the DHCPv6 client, however, it is not mentioned for the client to IPv4. I want to set up with my cable modem in Bridge mode accessing the WAN on the RV180 interface? So I would get the IP address of my ISP.

  Thank you

  Niels

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Hello Niels,

  The RV180W can certainly pick up a DHCP address from your ISP to the WAN interface, via a bridged modem. In fact, it is the default configuration. Of course, you can also change your type of connection to a static IP or PPPoE (DSL) connection profile.

  All our small business routers are certainly capable of this confiugartion. Personally, I currently use a RV180W with a cable connection. Public IP from my ISP very well address the picked up RV180W.

  All the best,

  -David Aguilar

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  1-866-606-1866

• How to use a VM vyatta to manage my LAN/WAN connections?

  I have a simple problem that is hard to explain, so please bear with me. I am using a router Vyatta VM to manage my local network. I have connectivity thoughout my local network but I cannot go outside my local network of the virtual machine. I have a linux box running ubuntu 8.04, vmware server 2.0.2 + vyatta VC6. eth1 on the box gets a public IP address from my ISP (we tell 1.1.1.2 for demonstration).

  eth1 has an eth1.2 to interface VLAN with private IP 192.168.1.2/24.

  I have some maps more who are bridge interface br0 with IP 192.168.2.2/24.

  Ubuntu eth1 (1.1.1.2) <-WAN

  Eth1.2 Ubuntu (192.168.1.2/24) <-LAN 1

  Br0 (192.168.2.2/24) Ubunru <-LAN 2

  Vyatta eth0 (192.168.1.1/24) is filled to eth1.2 <-LAN 1

  Vyatta eth1 (192.168.2.1/24) is bridged to br0 <-LAN 2

  Routes on the GNU / linux and vyatta appear to be configured correctly, but I can't do a ping of the Vyatta VM to the internet (say google http://74.125.45.105) or my gateway address ISP 1.1.1.1 that, however, I can ping from the Vyatta VM to the linux box eth1 1.1.1.2, which is a "public" IP address I thought I'd add a static route to 0.0.0.0/0 next hop 1.1.1.2 would do it but still no cookies. Someone knows what's the problem?

  Graphic text

  192.168.1.1-> 192.168.1.2- >-> X WWW 1.1.1.2

  Vyatta VM Ubuntu Ubuntu

  eth0 eth1.2 eth1

  Since Ubuntu (gateway) can access the internet and vyatta can ping ubuntu, supposedly yor vyatta traffic should also masquerade by ubuntu to the internet.

  Could you try Internet (ICS) Login Script scipt below:

  Download ftp://ftp.no-x.org/vmware/ICS2

  Download on Ubuntu

  Change and replace INET_DEV with Ubuntu device which the connection to the internet (for example, eth1)

  chmod + x ICS2

  Run it $. / ICS2 start

  Test your vyatta

  vcbMC - 1.0.6 Beta

  Lite vcbMC - 1.0.7

  http://www.no-x.org

• I had my hacked email. I deleted the email address on the SMTP server, but Thunderbird is not allowing me to remove the hacked e-mail address.

  I had my email "[email protected]" pirate. I deleted the email address on the ISP e-mail server and created a new email "[email protected]" - without the H immediately after John.
  Thunderbird, I added the new email address (see table).
  However, every time I try and send an email, Thunderbird ask again me the password to the original email.
  How to make the new e-mail, the primary e-mail address / default and delete old email marked in bold on the seal - which I suppose is the right course of action?

  Concerning

  John Halsted

  Enter the account settings.

  Select the new address to be the default.
  All at the bottom of the list of accounts in the left side is account Actions.
  Under this menu is to set as default.

  FYI: The display of your e-mail is that a public forum is the best way to provider of this info to hackers. I edit this info and refrain from publishing personal information in the future.