attestation / issue of access policy

Similar Questions

• Strange behavior after giving a role to access policy.

  Greetings.
  I use OIM 11.1.1.3 and I also use the DBUM 9.1.0.4 adapter.
  I defined 3 roles in IOM once I've defined three strategies of access to available roles to a database.
  Each policy is associated with a role and a DBUM resource.
  In the end, I have the following policies.
  Role of role based policy name IOM
  1. policy role - A role - A DBRoleA
  2. policy role - role B - B DBRoleB
  3. policy role - role C - B DBRoleC.
  
  When a role is granted to the user of the IOM by using the Administration Console is implemented as a correct database to the specified database. But if I revoke a role from the user and grant the same role yet the specified role are not configured on the specified database.
  Example: A user 'Role A', 'Rôle B', 'C Role' in the database of the user have DBRoleA, DBRoleB, DBRoleC.
  After revocation "A Role" of the user, the database have the roles of good DBRoleB and DBRoleC.
  But if "A" is again granted the user the DBRoleA is not provisioned in the database.
  
  I activated the dbum log file and it looks like a bad role has been chosen and the DBRoleB the role of database to be configured. Because we see in the log file when the user is granted the "A role":
  
  [WLS_OIM1] [TRACE] [[OIMCP.] DBUM] [tid: [ASSETS].] [[ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [username: oiminternal] [ecid: 0000JDjSF5i9h ^ 5prOt1iY1EgfQX0000lD, 0] [SRC_CLASS: com.thortech.util.logging.Logger] [APP: IOM #11.1.1.3.0] [decided: 4506c477d760fc7e:26c2d53a:1336a1dbc64: - 7ffd - 0000000000000 d 45] [SRC_METHOD: Debug] oracle.iam.connectors.dbum.integration.DBUMProvisionManager: getChildFormData: form Value2011-11-04[2011-11-04T11:37:14.392-05:00] [WLS_OIM1] [PATH] [[OIMCP]. DBUM] [tid: [ASSETS].] [ExecuteThread: '2' for the queue: "(self-adjusting) weblogic.kernel.Default"] [username: oiminternal] [ecid: 0000JDjSF5i9h ^ 5prOt1iY1EgfQX0000lD, 0] [SRC_CLASS: com.thortech.util.logging.Logger] [APP: IOM #11.1.1.3.0] [decided: 4506c477d760fc7e:26c2d53a:1336a1dbc64: - 7ffd - 0000000000000 d 45] [SRC_METHOD: Debug] oracle.iam.connectors.dbum.integration.DBUMProvisionManager: getChildFormData: mapping of data from child form received:-{UD_DB_ORA_R_VERSION = 0, UD_DB_ORA_R_KEY = 3180, UD_DB_ORA_R_UPDATE = 2011-11-04, UD_DB_ORA_R_CREATE = 2011-11-04 {, process Instance.Key = 5916, UD_DB_ORA_R_UPDATEBY = 6 UD_DB_ORA_R_ROLE = 102 ~ * DBRoleB *, Access Policies.Key = 183, UD_DB_ORA_R_CREATEBY = 6}
  
  
  The issue is that anyone has experienced the same problem?
  Is there another way of provisioning of database roles after granting roles of the IOM?
  
  Thank you!
  Ramiro Ortiz

  Re: Roles and access policies

  I created an access policy (with renovation = revoke, if not applicable = true) that is, if the user is a member of the role XYZ, it should be provided for an application automatically (RBAC). Sometimes it works fine, but sometimes even if the user is a member of the role of XYZ, the user is not configured

• Provisioning of users of automated Seggregate using Access Policy-Diff groups/Org

  Hello
  
  By default, users created in IOM - via GTC / via self-registration / via administrator - they all are assigned to the "All Users" group Can we assign these users to another group, defined by the user, for example "trialgroup", default and Unassign the group "All Users". If so, how can we do?
  
  This issue is related to another question of mine:
  
  I want to avoid all the users that are created in the IOM system - to be all together put in service to a single IT resource in my case OID directly via the access policy that can be applied to each group. I want to keep the system extensible for future purposes. And the only way is to the provision of resources direct seggregate via access through different 'groups' strategy. So the solution I could think about was to assign all users who are currently created (via GTC and via the load mass in IOM) to a separate group and assign a policy of access to the group so that in the future if another resource comes into picture then the system can be extended by creating more groups and design of individual to separate for the same access policies.
  
  Is it makes sense?
  
  Please provide your inputs! Advice/suggestions/ideas are welcome.
  
  TIA,
  -oidm.

  I'm actually not sure, what you want to achieve form the content of this post. If you mean that you don't want each user to IOM to be configured in OID automatically via the access policy, then I suppose that in this case you aplly the ALL_USERS group access strategy.

  Well I miss the flow of your question, but here's what you can based on my understanding:

  (1) forget the ALL_USERS group. We cannot do anything about it. Any created user will be a part of this group, and you cannot delete a user in this group.
  (2) instead of what you can do is create another group, such as trialgroup and all users a member of this group as well. It would be simple to do. See the next step. Use the addMemberUser() of addMemberUser interface API.
  (3) create an adapter of the entity with an added javatask, which takes a username entry and assigns this user to this group (trialgroup) in the use of the IOM above API. Mount this adaptation for the trigger for insertion after the Manager of data objects "users." (He also has an other entity ootb adapter that adds all users to the Group of ALL_USERS).

  (4) attach your strategy of access to this group.
  (5) now you are also free to expand your system by creating more groups and access policies. It shouldn't be a problem.

  Thank you

  Sunny

• Parental Controls + Internet Access Policy 'Add' is shaded on

  I need to add several new devices to my "target devices" in the Parental control-Internet access policy and program schedules that devices can get online. But my 'Add' is shaded out and I'm not allowed to add devices. I use the browser to log in to the router.

  To manage access to the Internet, you have two methods available, Parental control and Internet access policy. That a method can be used at a time. So my first question which option you are trying to use to block or plan the Internet access?

  As the Parental controls can restrict internet access for up to five computers or devices. You can block access to the internet or to limit it to specific times, and you can also block specific Web sites.

  So if you have several devices then 5 to add then you should use the political Internet access option.

• Cannot change the access policy (firepower 6.1)

  Hello

  I use the Service Module of firepower on ASA5525 and MC, firepower, the two version 6.1.

  After the upgrade to version 6.1, I can't save any changes on my access policy. I always get a message "error saving data - another operation by another user has prevented this operation. Please try again after some time.
  I am the only on access to the MC, there is no task that is running and I tried to reload the MC, but I got the same error.

  Please, did anyone see that? This could be the cause?

  Thank you.

  I solved the problem by replacing all the objects 'Private network' by 'IPv4-private-All-RFC1918.

• apply access policy file policy

  Hello world

  I created a policy file on the center of the defense and must apply to the access policy so that it can reach the sensor.

  How can I do

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  To associate a policy file with an access control rule:

  Step 1 Select policies > access control.
  Step 2 Click Change next to the access control policy to change.
  Step 3 Click Add an article.
  Step 4 Ensure that Action is set to allow, block Interactive or Interactive block with reset.
  Step 5 The tab control.
  Step 6 Select a policy file.
  Step 7 Click Add to save your changes.

• What is the dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access?

  Can Hi anyone explain the following? I examine documents Cisco Anyconnect SSL VPN. It does not have these commands. What is the relationship of the Anyconnect VPN with these commands? Or send a link. Thank you

  -----

  dynamic-access-policy-registration ABC_Access

  Description 'access ABC '.

  WebVPN

  the value of the URL - list A_Intranet, ABC_Access

  SVC request to enable default svc

  --------------------

  I checked the document from Cisco, which say:

  Operating instructions

  Use the dynamic-access-policy-record command in configuration mode global to create one or more DAP records. When you use this command, you dynamic-access-policy-record mode, in which you can set attributes for the record named the DAP. The commands that you can use dynamic-access-policy-recording mode are:

  • Action (continue, terminate or quarantine)
  • Description
  • network-acl
  • priority
  • message from the user
  • WebVPN

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/ASA-command-reference/...

  That is - this to create one or more DAP records for?

  Please see the following guide for a good overview and details on the use and deployment of DAP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

• 5.2 ACS access policy

  Hello

  could you recommend me how I accomplish the following task, I need to configure ACS 5.2 to authenticate WIRELESS users.

  There are two types of users: users in domain and not domain users.  I want to authenticate users in domain with PEAP-MSCHAPv2.

  And no domain users, I want to authenticate the host lookup (MAC).

  The question is how to properly organize access policy? I need to access several services or access service will be sufficient.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Your understanding is very close but MAB to work to work with wireless users, you need to activate the option for mac filtering to the SSID. This setting is global and will always trigger unlike port based authentication where you can define a sequence of authentication.

  You can create a service and strategy with which you can leave several policies. For the parameters of the identity of this policy, you will need to create an identity store sequence so that either AD is used first, then the internal hosts serves as a second, or vice versa. For the identity parameter, you need to set the indicator not found user to continue.

  Let me know if it works.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani

  Please rate if useful!

• How to recover Access Policy based on OUD groups

  I have a table named userdata with 3 columns

  1 user name

  2 take

  3 OUDgroup(associated with user)

  I need to find the access policy attached with this OUD group and then retrieve the role associated with this access policy. Please help me

  Concerning

  SuperCoolDamnAwsome

  Hello

  By joining the POL, POG and UGP tables, we can get the name of role associated with the access policy.

  Here is the query to get the name of role associated with the access policy.

  Select p.pol_name, u.ugp_name, u.ugp_rolename in pol p, u of the PMU, pog where p.pol_key = pog.pol_key and you.ugp_key = pog.ugp_key;

  Hope this helps

  Thank you

• Access policy - value of the attribute of provisioning failure

  Hello

  is it possible to configure a value for the attribute of non-entitlement to access policy applies to all users? I changed a strategy of access and successfully implemented a change in the rights of the system target, but did not at the disposal of another value of the attribute (by changing the form of target system in the definition of the access policy).

  Peter

  In this case, you will need to write your own custom code and need to trigger as an adapter of task of process or event handlers.

  ~ J

• Harvest access policy does not

  Hello

  I'm accommodating a target system LDAP connected to IOM 11 GR 2 PS2 and I would like to use the political feature of harvest. I reconciled an account and it's target (rights) system roles in IOM and I waited this work to "Evaluate the user policies" would be given a role of IOM corresponding to the user (based on the system of law and the target defined in the access policy). But it doesn't work--not even after setting manual USER_PROVISIONING_ATTRS explicit. POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED = 1 (in the comic book) - after the work performed to the value of POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED is 0, but there is no association between the user account and the corresponding IOM role (I expect that this is the result of the harvest of the access policy).

  My setup - I set the cfg attributes XL system. AllowAPHarvesting, XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning to access TRUE, corresponding policy must be harvested system target filled in and also the corresponding payment is defined in the policy. Retro indicator is on. I did not set the discriminator to account for the target system because there is max one account per user in the target system LDAP.

  Can you help me identify the reason why the harvest is not working?

  Peter

  Hello

  Evaluate user policies does not associate a role of IOM with the user.

  The following post associate old user role:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E40329_01/admin.1112/e27149/Scheduler.htm#OMADM738

  Refresh the role memberships

  It assesses the role memberships and assigns users to roles based on rules. This work evaluates all the roles which the composition rules have changed since the last work performed and their immediate assessment have not been chosen by the administrator.

  None

  Yes

  ~ J

• Access policy owner OIM 11 G PS3

  Hello

  During the creation of the OIM 11 g PS3 access strategy, you can specify the owner of the policy. What is the use of this field and how does it serve practically?

  Thank you

  Access policy owner

  In this version, access policy owner has no any special privileges. The policy configuration UI access are available in the Administration of identity system, only system administrators can access this feature. There is also no authorization from added control of access policy of API access management policy owners.

  Reference: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E52734_01/oim/OMADM/accesspolicies.htm#OMADM3124

• Resource not available for selection in the access policy

  
  Hello

  I'm working on OIM11g R2 PS2 explore all of the new features available.

  I created a resource COMPUTING (SunONE_Resource) for the provision to users of SunONE (using the connector of the OID ) and got users provisioned it successfully asking for it by the Instance of the Application. Now I want to do it Auto-mis in service. So, I created a single policy role and access. But in step 2 of the access policy where we Julie IT resource, my resource (SunONE_Resource) IT is not visible and is the resource available only: LDAP User. I have selected LDAP user as a resource and create access policy.

  But when I'm allocating the specific role of the user, the user does not have configured my SunONE resource.

  I have run the Task Scheduler to assess access policies manually as well.

  Please help me in this regard.

  Kind regards

  Maryse

  Thanks for your quick response.

  I have fixed the problem. The problem was there 2 political access do the same thing. Thus, the system searches for a system property: XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning and it has been set to false.

  So, I changed the settings to another AP who was who collide with mine. Then it worked.

• API for access policy

  Hi all

  IOM have APIs for access policy?

  I use 11 GR 2 IOM SP13.

  Thanks in advance.

  dongsu

  Hello

  9.x API - tcAccessPolicyOperationsIntf (Oracle Fusion Middleware Java QAnywhere for Oracle Identity Manager)

• Access policy - remove a child table element

  Hello world

  I know that I can add the security group (child table of resource user AD) an AD with a Pollicy to access user account.

  Can I delete a group of security with an access policy?

  Thank you.

  Best regards.

  Yes you can.

  Case 1: Using existing access policy

  Change the access policy and to remove political access groups and access policy reassess existing aid assess political task of the user.

  This reapply the access policy and remove the eligibility list from the user groups and has AD.

  Case 2: Creating new access policy

  In this can create new policy without children table entries/groups.

  Then you must change the value of rule out based on your new political will to triggered.

  Role a rule say role is 'Full Time'

  unless and until what your role does not change new access policy will not comes into picture.

  suggestion if you perform commissioning using the access policy and then also use political access of shortages of resources and rights it will work well.