block diagram free programmatically return labels

Similar Questions

• How do I block diagram page where a free label is visible/active?

  Hello

  I'm looking to be able to select a certain free tag and make the block diagram page where it is visible/active? I want to be able to screenshot of the diagram where the free label programmatically. Is this possible?

  Rgds,

  SMcS12

  A simple property node GObj (object highkight) does the trick. I used script where there is no option to highlight the particular frame.

• How can I activate on labels in the block diagram, but not on the front panel?

  This question may have been asked before, but searching the Forum did not.

  In LabVIEW 2010, I have 16 indicators of chain on the front panel. I can't have the label for each Visible on the front panel, so I turned it off. But in the block diagram, I need distinguqish one of the other, so I need to make the label (name) visible.

  In the block diagram, if I select indicators Sting all together and go to properties and make the label visible, it makes visible labels on the front but not visible in the block diagram. What good is that?

  How the help of labels (name) of the indicators String visible in the block diagram, but not visible on the front?

  dbaechtel wrote:

  This question may have been asked before, but searching the Forum did not.

  Don't remember already asked this question and get help in this thread?

  Have you tried the things I said in that thread?  How did they not work?

  Right-click on the terminal of BD and make visible > labels.

  It probably will be the FP control show its label as well.  Then go to the FP control, right-click and go to Visible > labels and uncheck the box.

  The terminal of the comics will have a label, and control of the FP will not.

• block diagram control label display

  I hope this has an easy solution.

  I got code that has different formats for the control labels as they are posted on the block diagram.

  Some have rectangles around the label, others do not.

  I'm sure there's a simple (albeit tedious) way to make them all the same.

  I realize that this is only cosmetic, but I prefer to code to be consistent.

  I really don't like that as they are (although the new controls have rectangles, rectangles is probably better).

  Does anyone know how to set this property?

  Also, why would a view chosen on the other.  I guess it's just personal preference.

  Thank you

  I was in the same situation.  I prefer the no border around the labels.  I think the 8.5 they've added another property in the menu options, so you can choose whether you want the border.  The property is 'Use transparent name tags' on the block diagram tab.  To change existing labels, you can use the brush with T selected for color (if you don't want any border look).

• How to add text on the block diagram

  How can you add plain text to the block diagram for the documentation and if I can change the background color to yelllow or something else that can be useful? See the image below

  

  Just a double click in an empty area and start typing. Use color to color the background of the text.

  (there is also a 'free label' in the range of decorations, but that seems to be a detour )

• Deleting the definition of Type casuses control a lot of misreferences and program in the block diagram errors

  In LabVIEW 2010, I have a Def Type control i.e. a Cluster with several other controls within the Cluster. Apparently, the references to the controls in the block diagram are based on the order that the controls have been added to the Type definition command. The side effect of this is that if a control is removed from the command of Type definition, many of the done Variable reference in the block diagram or now either broken, or worse still, refer to wrong control in the Type definition. These problems are quite difficult to find and fix.

  Comment: If you create a control of Type definition and make a Cluster. Now add any controls to the Cluster in an order, let's say A, B, C, D. Their types does not matter. Now use the Type definition in one or more controls on the front panel. In the block mark references to controls inside the Type Def would control on FP. Now return to the Type definition and remove the command B of the definition of Type. Now, lots of errors appear. Broken links. But worse still, you see old references to B that now refer to C and old references to C are now referring to the old references to D and D are removed altogether, etc..  This side effect is much more errors, broken links and misreferences than expected otherwise.

  How add and remove controls anywhere in a Cluster in a Type definition, at will, without creating a whole bunch of errors in program, broken links and misreferences for controls in the Type definition that have not changed?

  
  

• What is the best way to keep the block diagram / cleaning of façade?

  Hello

  I'm relatively new to Labview so I'm not able to say if I'm overloading my programs or make my too crowded block diagram. I was wondering if there was some ways to tell if I can simplify my programming just by looking (perhaps only experience contributes to these things)?

  I enclose my VI here. Currently, she is able to monitor the voltage and current of two engines. On the screen, you can see an indicator with the voltage and current values and there are cards that can display signals of different engines with a menu drop-down.

  The façade is pretty clean, in my opinion of novice, but the block schema seems messy to me, just at the first glance. I foresee a problem occurring in the future however. In the future, I will have the VI to monitor 50 engines globally. All of the programming will be the same as the one I have now, but it will have 50 indicators and unfortunately 50 times just about everything. I would like to avoid this, but I don't know how I did.

  I use a USB-6009. I use its four differential inputs to monitor the voltage and current of the two engines. In the future, I will get more units DAQ (25 in total because 2 motors can be monitored for each data acquisition). The new Renault will help will help with more resource space, but I think things complicate with the added option of 24 more Assistants of data acquisition (as used in my code).

  Thanks for any help you might be able to provide!

  Usually, it is above all the experience that will teach you the best methods for making your code to do pretty. I don't know anyone who is proud of his first application of claws. There are some resources out there to help with best practices, as that group on ni.com, but you will learn most of your own development.

  Your façade is superb. FPs in general really are to you. You can do it as ugly or pretty as you want. When you have a few controls in duplicate and the Group of indicators, you should use clusters and berries to simplify. You can use a bit of cleanup in this regard, but not much. In addition, I personally hate read red text unless it is a warning any.

  Your block diagram could use a little cleaning in a sense of modularity. You have a lot of repeated code, which you might consolidate in to a Subvi, which is used in multiple locations, or in a loop For. A general rule is to keep your block diagram within a single monitor. You should not scroll. Your application is quite simple, so it is difficult to BUMBLE

  Here are a few details on your block diagram:

  • Click with the right button on your devices on the block diagram and uncheck the "display as icon". You are welcome.
  • Operations on each waveform "(x*2-4)" / 16 in double ": create a Subvi and/or run the waveforms through a loop."
  • You do a lot of 2-element arrays and then indexing. Just replace the ones that have a Select node based on digital.
  • All your code runs every time, including the knots of your property at the bottom, which is not necessary. As you learn LabVIEW architectures, you will learn how to get around this with the initialization and the output of code, but for now, you should put a case around those structure for only when the engine numbers change.
  • I don't know how you're timing your main loop, but you should put a delay in there because you don't need the DAQmx node shoot as fast as your CPU will allow.

  There are videos of intro free that you can watch to learn what OR think in terms of coding and teach you some of the basic features and such. Here's a three-hour course, and here's a six-hour course.

• VI of script to read comments of block diagram

  Hi people,

  I have a small project to attempt to harvest comments in the block diagram, perhaps the help of scripts of VI. So, for example, when I'm checking #ToDo comments, I can get a list of the VI appearing in the #tag and collect the text. I think I found the method to get the comment, but I don't know how to recover the text in the comment. Here is a picture of how to get to observation in the block diagram (just using this as one small example VI)

  

  Thanks for your help!

  Rik

  James.Morris wrote:

  Here's what you want. It is worth noting that the current code only outputs the comment outside the structure of the case because you will need to dive into the structure for what anyone inside.

  Yes this will cross all GObjects, but I'm sure there's a bookmark API Manager that will return comments bookmark if this is what you are looking for.

  

  EDIT: Okay, there's an invoke node returns info bookmark on a VI but the VI reference may not be running.

• At just transfomed Apple we in cows with the new iTune, which block the free radio stations?

  Have we became just the cows to milk for Apple with the new iTune which blocks the free stations?

  N °

• What this block diagram?

  What this block diagram?

  Match a VI Modbus Library. But I have because if the block is configured to write multiple coils in the coils because reading is set to 1?

  All this work?

  Sorry if the question is a beginner.

  

  In this block diagram, 'Coils Read' and 'Write multiple coils' are enumerated values (or possibly ringtones of appeal, which is not serious for the purpose of this explanation). Enumerations assign names to numbers, to make them easier to read. The coils Read command is set to 1, the command to write multiple coils has a value of 15. You don't need to worry about this number, however, because the enumeration takes care of it for you.

  The constant cluster containing coils of reading is there just to provide the correct data type (a cluster with the right items). Almost all the elements of the latter shall be replaced by the values of wired in the Bundle to node Name. For example, the value of reading coils is there as a placeholder for any function Code. the actual Code of the function is defined by plugging write multiple coils in Bundle by name.

• Clean using SubVIs block diagram

  Hi guys and welcome to my first post!

  I m a bit new to labview, so be a little patient, if I do not understand everything immediately

  Im working on an existing program that is used to control an MCU on BabyLin on my front, although I have a visualization to see live changes to the system. The program works very well so far, but I m trying to clean up the block diagram. This should be done by subvis, right? I ve read a lot about the size of the block diagram should not increase my screen. Well, im at a length of about 3 x 2 screens (24 "!) after trying to use subvis and to shorten the distances between structures. The only things remaining are huge amounts of local variables and references (they existed already before I got to know the program), mainly for viewing. If I create a Subvi part containing the people of the country, it will change the references that does not make the program more readable (and small), and I guess I can't put a new Subvi on references + Subvi.

  You have any ideas what to do? I hope that I forgot something, otherwise, do not hesitate to ask.

  Kind regards

  Leo

  Bob_Schor wrote:

  To get a handle on the structure of your high-level code, write down (as if you were telling your boss or tell your wife - who knows, they might be the same person!) that you are trying to do.  Keep it pretty General.  You specified a number of steps?  So maybe the top level should be a State Machine, or a message in queue manager.  Describe you something that works at a constant speed, generating data that you have to manage "on the fly"?  Maybe it's a design of producer/consumer.

  You have a lot of initialization?  Put in a Subvi, bring the 20 son out in a bundle (it's "Boss-word" for a Cluster).  Your main program must have a few loops, with values that persist (possibly changing) during the program running in Shift Registers near the top of the loop, with tables and Clusters used to keep related items "consolidated".

  Not too bothered by the size of your routine - I recently downloaded a monster 50-monitor the Forums (I did not even try to understand), up to 6 monitors is nothing!

  Let "encapsulate the function" and "hide details" to be your guide in the reflection on the creation of the screws.

  Bob Schor

  To develop on the analogy of Bob, each talking point can be a Subvi.  In other words, code group associate subVIs.  The advantage of this is that it is much easier to solve problems because all errors will be localized to a Subvi.  Errors no longer Chase around the block diagram.  I guess you can use your current VI as an example of what NOT to do on the block diagram.

• Index Array icons: Palette and divergence of block diagram

  Hi all

  Why are the Index Array icons discrepants?

  There is a small difference between the two of them...

  ... That's how you see when you look at the table Palette...

  

  ... But this is how it appears when it is placed in the block diagram.

  

  Compare yourself:

  

  Is there a reason for this? I don't really know. I also looked for a thread about this, but I have found no.

  Have you ever noticed this?

  BTW, I'm using LabVIEW 2012 SP1.

  Best regards

  Hi João,.

  so to summarize:

  -l' icon changes when wiring to a 2D array entry rather than a 1 d of entry table

  -l' icon changes too much wiring when a 2D array input and, in addition, all the wiring index entries

  -l' also shows context help leaves how to index more than one element of an array

  -the range (maybe) shows an old version of the icon

  There is more than a simple icon fixed to IndexArray function, but that only one version is displayed. You will notice this behavior for many more functions...

• block diagram window becomes higher in win7 64-bit using LV2011 32-bit sp1

  I have a strange problem and I wonder if anyone has ever seen this behavior. Often, when I go to the block diagram window, it will become the top window that is it is located at the top of all other windows including LabVIEW non-windows! I have to close the VI and really open to fix the problem. I see this on 3 machines, all the dell of m6600 laptops so I think it's maybe a graphics driver issue. Any ideas?
  Thank you
  Michael.

  Tori,
  I confirm that this problem can be solved by removing the Dell Premier color utility that installs with the driver dell put on hardware compatible color first. The question of the window occurs when LabVIEW works so there is some kind of conflict. Anyway, problem solved for me.

• Reduce clutter in the control on my block diagram reference...

  Is it possible to reduce the amount of clutter on my block diagram when needing to enable and disable controls so that the tests are running? I know that I can place the instruction box in a Subvi, but I'm looking for the best method recommended to reduce clutter when listing references. Using LabVIEW 2015.

  Here is a small example of what I speak, there will be only for references to be added as the devlops of VI.

  

  Thank you

  Kellen

  rkmadse wrote:

  When you say I can clustor FP, say things that I did, and I have a group of controls such as those below in a clustor. I still have to generate reference constants, which are then placed in clustors. If I want to disable I would have then to consolidate each reference in the clustor, then ungroup and disable each control individually. I bet I'm really missing the point here and I'd love more explanation.

  Thank you

  Kellen

  My main problem is not being able to place real dangerous in a Clustor.

  You think about transportation, when I talk about the horse. Your façade elements can be in a cluster, and then you can use the reference to the pole to disable all. See:

  

  You will get a façade looking slightly different between the two options if you use disabled and Grayed out because when you grey on the whole cluster, the gray edges. When you gray unique items in the cluster, the cluster edges remain normal.

• HOWTO call "n" independent instances of 'Decimate (continuous) .vi"without putting instances of"n"of the VI on the block diagram?

  I have a double 2D chart I want to decimate continuously using the ".vi (continuous) Decimate" located in the range of Signal Processing. This VI is set on reentrant preallouee clone because it uses a FGV to save the State of the call to.  What I could do, but do not want to, is having a huge index table and wire 20 + 1 table of DBL to 20 + unique VI instances decimate to ensure that each have their own data space and no 'cross-talk' doesn't happen, then 'picture of generation' all back after the fact.

  I'm almost certain, there is a much cleaner way to do it with only one instance of unique block diagram of the VI decimate using techniques of the call by reference.   I found my way to this link: Preallocated-Reentrant-VI-within-Parallelized-For-Loop that talks about something similar.  After reading pages of four and the detailed help about the function 'Open VI référence' my head is spinning again on what option I want to spend (0x08 or 0x40 + 0x100) to ensure that whenever a slna 2D table come in, each of them is decimated by using the same clone that was used the last time it was called.

  Although the DBL entry 2D array always has the same number of lines, now, it is not always in the future this number and ideal would not force me to create several references strictly typed in VI decimate that will have to change as grows the number of rows in the table 2D static DBL.

  Anyone ready to set up an example VI that takes an array 2D arbitrary of DBL as input, decimating each line using the same clone independent of the "Decimate (continuous) .vi" and outputs the newly decimated 2D Array of LDM?  Assume that each line uses the same factor of decimation and 'Sprawl' set to False.

  Necessity is the mother of all invention and since it upsets me when I read a post that has a similar problem with no resolution, I felt compelled to post mine here.   I'm sure it's better I can do within the current state of LabVIEW.   The only question I have is what happens if I put the call by reference for loop be parallelizable?  That trash completely the nature of 1 to 1 of what I intended?