Bypass the router upstream company ACL with IPSEC VPN

Similar Questions

• Problem with IPSec VPN ISA500 & login questions (multiple devices)

  I have a Cisco ISA500, we use for connection with IPSEC VPN of some products apple (MacBook Pro and iPad). We can operate randomly once in a while, but it fails most of the time of negotiation. Someone at - it suggestions on what I can do to make this work?

  I did test it on my Linux machine and it does not when I had configured default settings. I had to change the NAT Traversal for UDP CISCO on the Linux machine for the connection to work.

  14/04/03 20:54:13 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:54:13 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_AGGR_R1. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:30 - warning - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:30 - warning - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_AGGR_R1. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: STATE_AGGR_R1: sent AR1, expected AI2.; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: regardless of the payload of unknown Vendor ID [16f6ca16e4a4066d83821a0f0aeaa862]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] Vendor ID = 107, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] Vendor ID = 106, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] Vendor ID = 108, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received Vendor ID value = 109 payload [RFC 3947] method; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [XAUTH]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: STATE_AGGR_R1: sent AR1, expected AI2.; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute.  Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: regardless of the payload of unknown Vendor ID [16f6ca16e4a4066d83821a0f0aeaa862]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] Vendor ID = 107, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] Vendor ID = 106, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] Vendor ID = 108, but already using method 109; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received Vendor ID value = 109 payload [RFC 3947] method; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]; (pluto)
  2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [XAUTH]; (pluto)

  Hi rich,

  What version of firmware you used before upgrade?  You upgrade to 1.2.19 and now this works?

  Thank you

  Brandon

• Problem with IPsec VPN between ASA and router Cisco - ping is not response

  Hello

  I don't know because the IPsec VPN does not work. This is my setup (IPsec VPN between ASA and R2):

  my network topology data:

  LAN 1 connect ASA - 1 (inside the LAN)

  PC - 10.0.1.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.1

  ASA - GigabitEthernet 1: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0

  -----------------------------------------------------------------

  ASA - 1 Connect (LAN outide) R1

  ASA - GigabitEthernet 0: 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252

  R1 - FastEthernet 0/0: 172.30.1.1 255.255.255.252

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------

  R1 R2 to connect

  R1 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.1 255.255.255.252

  R2 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252

  R2 for lan connection 2

  --------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 to connect LAN2

  R2 - FastEthernet 0/0: 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0

  PC - 10.0.2.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.1

  ASA configuration:

  1 GigabitEthernet interface
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
  no downtime
  interface GigabitEthernet 0
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252
  no downtime
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.1.1

  ------------------------------------------------------------

  access-list scope LAN1 to LAN2 ip 10.0.1.0 allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
  object obj LAN
  subnet 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
  object obj remote network
  10.0.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
  NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source obj-local obj-local destination obj-remote control remote obj non-proxy-arp static

  -----------------------------------------------------------
  IKEv1 crypto policy 10
  preshared authentication
  aes encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 3600
  Crypto ikev1 allow outside
  crypto isakmp identity address

  ------------------------------------------------------------
  tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 ipsec-attributes
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key cisco123
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-192 ASA1TS, esp-sha-hmac ikev1

  -------------------------------------------------------------
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 is the LAN1 to LAN2 address
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set peer 172.30.2.2
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set transform-set ASA1TS ikev1
  card crypto ASA1VPN set 10 security-association life seconds 3600
  ASA1VPN interface card crypto outside

  R2 configuration:

  interface fastEthernet 0/0
  IP 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
  no downtime
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  IP 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252
  no downtime

  -----------------------------------------------------

  router RIP
  version 2
  Network 10.0.2.0
  network 172.30.2.0

  ------------------------------------------------------
  access-list 102 permit ahp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
  access-list 102 permit esp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
  access-list 102 permit udp host 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2 eq isakmp
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  IP access-group 102 to

  ------------------------------------------------------
  crypto ISAKMP policy 110
  preshared authentication
  aes encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 42300

  ------------------------------------------------------
  ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 172.30.1.2

  -----------------------------------------------------
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 128 R2TS

  ------------------------------------------------------

  access-list 101 permit tcp 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

  ------------------------------------------------------

  R2VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  match address 101
  defined by peer 172.30.1.2
  PFS Group1 Set
  R2TS transformation game
  86400 seconds, life of security association set
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  card crypto R2VPN

  I don't know what the problem

  Thank you

  If the RIP is not absolutely necessary for you, try adding the default route to R2:

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1

  If you want to use RIP much, add permissions ACL 102:

  access-list 102 permit udp any any eq 520

• HTTPS access to the router does not work with Firefox 33.0

  HTTPS access to the router Linksys wrt610n has worked so that Firefox 32.0.3 the dd - wrt software of this router is self-signed certificate with the public key RSA = 512 bits (Yes, it's too short today). From Firefox 33.0 and whose 34, 35, 36-access https does not work. It is desirable to restore https behavior as in Firefox 32.0.3 (with warning and ability to do security exception). Please see the attachment with a https query result in different versions of Firefox.
  Thank you.

  Hello, make suggestions to the https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1038487 help in your case?

• CONNECTION PROBLEMS WITH THE ROUTER (NETGEAR) - no problem with the provider of speed as it has been checked__

  • Programs you have problems with - very slow connection with all pages
  • Error messages - on the profile of my son is unable to connect at all with the error message
  • Recent changes made to your computer - windows 7 but added meeting the problem before this
  • What you have already tried the problem - claimant contacted no problem with their connection

  Remember - this is a public forum so never post private information such as numbers of mail or telephone!

  Hello

  Reinstall the NIC drivers
  Reset the router and check.

• Easy VPN with IPSec VPN L2L (Site - to - Site) in the same ASA 5505

  Hi Experts,

  We have an ASA 5505 in our environment, and currently two IPSec VPN L2L tunnels are established. But we intend to connect with VPN (Network Extension Mode) easy to another site as a customer. Is it possible to configure easy VPN configurations by keeping the currently active IPSec L2L VPN(Site-to-Site) tunnels? If not possible is there any work around?

  Here's the warning we get then tried to configure the easy VPN Client.

  NOCMEFW1 (config) # vpnclient enable

  * Delete "nat (inside) 0 S2S - VPN"

  * Detach crypto card attached to the outside interface

  * Remove the tunnel groups defined by the user

  * Remove the manual configuration of ISA policies

  CONFLICT of CONFIG: Configuration that would prevent the Cisco Easy VPN Remo success

  you

  operation was detected and listed above. Please solve the

  above a configuration and re - activate.

  Thanks and greetings

  ANUP sisi

  "Dynamic crypto map must be installed on the server device.

  Yes, dynamic crypto is configured on the EasyVPN server.

  Thank you

• Is there a way to force the router to re-enroll with to take down the tunnel?

  Hi all

  I have the following configuration:

  Crypto pki trustpoint mycompany.com
  number of registration attempts 5
  retry registration period 3
  Enrollment url http://x.x.x.x:80
  Serial number no
  domain name full routername.mycompany.com
  IP address no
  password
  name of the object l = Denver, c = US
  revocation checking no
  automatic registration of the 70s

  Scenario of

  If the certificate has already reached 70 percent of his time of life and the router has already tried 5 times to get a new failure.

  1. is there a way to know how many times the router tried to re-enroll?

  2. is there a way to force the router to re-register without down tunnels?

  3. If the router has already tried, I can increase auto-enrollment to 90 - would this work?

  Thank you very much in advance for your answers.

  See you soon!

  mguzman4158:

  Question 1

  The following command output may indicate failures of re-registration after that as they occur.

  HQ-edg01 #sh crypto pki timers

  PKI timers
  |  1:59:35.732 2D
  |  2D 1:59:35.732 CRL cannot display the COP
  | 353d 8:31:22.880 SURVIVOR CA.domain.null

  Question 2

  This chapter: setting up registration of certificate for a public key infrastructure

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_cert_enroll_pki.PDF

  ... and this chapter: set up and manage a server of Cisco IOS for the deployment of public key infrastructure certificates

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_cfg_mng_cert_serv.PDF

  ... from this Book: Guide of the Cisco IOS Security Configuration: connectivity secure, release 12.4 T

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/12_4t/sec_secure_connectivity_12_4t_book.PDF

  .. could help.

  Question 3

  In my opinion, I think that you would be able to revive the reinstatement at a later date by incrementing the percentage argument.

  Best regards
  Mike

• Context with IPSec VPN

  Hi friends,

  I have a question for the scenario below.

  I need to create a Site-Site IPSec VPN in the firewall mode.

  Is it possible to create the tunnel.

  I have ASA 5510 Security Plus with Ver 8.3

  Thanks in advance.

  In your case, you ASA in multiple-context to allow VPN to the amp.

  There is no problem with that.

  The only restrictions are that an ASA in multiple context will not work as a VPN endpoint (apart from a tunnel admin)... but you can pass the traffic or VPN traffic as in ASAs in simple mode.

  Federico.

• Suddenly our router keeps losing the internet.   The representative of the Cox says that IPV6 on the router is not compatible with the Cisco modem.   I'm turning it off?   Who is?   All started 3 days ago.   Have to reboot AirPort Extreme

  Suddenly Tuesday, our wifi stopped working.   Cox can not see anything on their end.   So far, we had to restart 5 times.   I finally realized that it is not the modem (Cisco), but our AirPort Extreme.   That's all that needs to be restarted.   I talked to a technician that I got to know, and she said that this week this problem started occurring with customers who have extremes of the airport.   Something about the airport in IPV6 and this is not compatible.   Before systems were PVI until the numbers came out (?)   In any case, she said Cox could not fix this, that I needed to talk to Apple to see if I could disable IPV6, at least for now.   I think I see how to do this, but does it make sense to anyone?   We have a new modem, installed in January, Cisco DPQ3212, good speeds, no issues whatsoever until this week.   There are also 2 other friends here (Scottsdale, Cox) with extremes of the airport.   Any suggestions?

  Cox has made a number of recent changes to their service, and they are trying to integrate IPv6 technology into their signals. They have not fully implemented the changes that must be made, and not commit to a date where things will be fully installed.

  Everything was fine until Cox implements these recent changes, and now Cox is blaming the problem on Apple. Apple has a different answer, as you can imagine. It is typical among manufacturers... blame the other guy.

  Apple routers are picking up some of the information they need to work with IPv6 and Cox, but since Cox has not completed the process, you'll probably best results trying to not use IPv6 with the airport router at all until you receive word of Cox that their systems are ready.

  The bottom line to this problem can be resolved by asking "What has changed".  The answer is Cox has changed.

  Configure your router to the airport most convenient to use IPv6 local link parameters only for now, to see if this will help.  You will not be able to realize all the benefits of IPv6 at the moment, but I hope that things will improve.

  

• Router 886VA Site to site ipsec vpn fqdn

  Hello

  I would like to create a vpn site-to site with a crypto fqdn on the side of the branch.

  The reason is in our head office in the wan IP will be hungry for change, and I want the branch office router to reconnect as soon as they get the new ip address.

  How could a which?

  Here is my Config:

   ip domain lookup source-interface Dialer0 crypto isakmp policy 10 encr aes authentication pre-share group 2 lifetime 14400 crypto isakmp key MyKey address 22.22.22.22 crypto ipsec transform-set MySET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto map BranchMap 10 ipsec-isakmp description HDG set peer 22.22.22.22 set transform-set MySET match address 110 int Dialer 0 ip access-group 101 in cryptop map BranchMap access-list 101 remark INT DIALER0 INCOMING access-list 101 permit udp host 62.2.24.162 eq domain host 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit udp host 62.2.17.60 eq domain host 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit udp host 22.22.22.22 host 11.11.11.11 eq non500-isakmp access-list 101 permit udp host 22.22.22.22 host 11.11.11.11 eq isakmp access-list 101 permit esp host 22.22.22.22 host 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit ahp host 22.22.22.22 host 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 permit tcp any any established access-list 101 permit udp host 129.132.2.21 eq ntp host 11.11.11.11 eq ntp access-list 101 permit udp host 130.60.75.52 eq ntp host 11.11.11.11 eq ntp access-list 101 permit udp host 8.8.8.8 eq domain host 11.11.11.11 access-list 101 remark INT DIALER0 INCOMING

  11.11.11.11 = > local WAN IP Branch

  22.22.22.22-online distance seat WAN IP

  Thank you

  If your HQ has a (rare) dynamic IP address, you must do 3 things:

  1. set up a dynamic DNS host name for your HQ VPN peer (dyndns.org, etc..)

  2. your counterpart dynamic crypto map using "dynamic peer hqddns.company.com defined".

  3. your isakmp for the peer key a wildcard character ("crypto isakmp key addr 0.0.0.0")

  If you say that it is an IP change single opposite HQ, then maybe:

  1 Add the new IP address to your 'access-list 101' ACL (remember to use a name instead of ACL numbered for readability)

  2. Add another encryption with the new IP address isakmp key

  3. Add the new IP address as secondary peer:

  map BranchMap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto
  the default peer 22.22.22.22
  defined peer 3.3.3.3

• site noncisco routers with IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I try to connect Router 2911 cisco routers noncisco (HP, TPlink) using ipsec site to site vpn with crypto-cards.

  the problem is that vpn ensuring shows '#send error' if command "crypto isakmp identity dn" is used (we use it for authentication of certificate based for cisco vpn clients). When I remove the command, vpn works great with noncisco devices.

  Please can you advice if there is no option on cisco ios to fix the problem.

  Thank you

  Giga

  good,

  try to use the isakmp profile something like below:

  crypto isakmp profile test
  function identity address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255

  under card crypto profiles isakmp as below:

  test 1 test ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  -Altaf

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Using dynamic PAT with IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I will say first of all thanks for reading this post.

  My goal is to create a dynamic PAT for 5 private host 1 ip address public, then to allow this ip address public 1 via an ipsec tunnel.

  I have an ASA5555 running on code 9.2 (1).  Here's what I have so far:

  network of object obj - 12.12.12.12 {mapped address}

  host 12.12.12.12

  object-group, LAN {address}

  host 10.0.0.1

  host 10.0.0.2

  host 10.0.0.3

  host 10.0.0.4

  host 10.0.0.5

  NAT (inside, outside) dynamic source LOCAL obj - 12.12.12.12

  First question - haven't set up that PAT correctly? I'm trying to PAT the local private addresses on the public address 12.12.12.12

  Now I would use 12.12.12.12 as interesting traffic and leave it in a vpn tunnel:

  access-list 1 extended permit ip host 12.12.12.12 object-group Remote_Network

  This configuration seems correct?  Is there another way to accomplish the same task?

  Thank you for your time.

  Looks good so far.

  But if this PAT is only for VPN traffic, then you can change the policy-nat NAT rule:

   nat (inside,outside) source dynamic LOCAL obj-12.12.12.12 destination static Remote_Network Remote_Network

• What does this mean and how to fix: the router address you entered is not compatible with your WAN IP address.

  I connect to an access provider via Airport Extreme, which is extended through two Airport Express.  When I try to edit anything in one of these devices, even a name, I get this message: "you have entered the address of the router is not compatible with your WAN IP address.  My connection seems to work, but there is clearly something wrong with her.  The Express has no DNS and will not update without the same message.  I have no idea what this is all about and will greatly appreciate the ideas.

  This means that WAN Setup does not or does not install across the network.

  The best way to solve this problem is beginning on...

  Reset all three at the factory and reconfigure each in turn. Do the extreme first and make sure it works... Then add the express.

  If you need help with that we will need to know which modem or modem router to your ISP gave you and possibly the type of services to wide band... and who is the provider.

  Give us screenshots of each installer as you do.

• Two routers connected, but no Internet on the router downstream

  Hi, I followed the instructions in the FAQ for routers chaining daisy with only partial success.  I have a WRT54GS V6 router configured as my gateway.  The downstream router is a BEFSR41 v4.  Both have the latest firmware.

  I have visibility on the full network of machines, but the PC connected to the router downstream has no access to the internet.  PC connected to the router upstream did.

  I tried to exchange the two routers and reconfiguration, but only once the PC connected to the router upstream has access to the internet.

  Current configuration:

  Gateway - router WRT54GS

  Router IP: 192.168.1.1

  From IP ADDR: 192.168.1.100

  DHCP server: enabled

  Downstream BEFSR41 router.

  Router IP: 192.168.1.2

  DHCP server: disabled

  Any help is appreciate

  Thank you

  On a computer that has no internet open a command prompt window and type "ipconfig/all". After the output full in your next post.

  When you connect the computer to the other router must internet?