Can farm FPGA compilation split a single compilation?

Similar Questions

• Question of FPGA compile farm 2012

  I was under the impression that my FPGA LV code can be compiled by several workers when I bought and installed the FPGA compile farm Toolkit.  What I have, however, is that each work of compilation can only be compiled by a worker.  I expect that a single compilation work can be divided by the number of workers.

  So I see that a worker of computers will compile two computers of worker work.  It's just that a worker will be compiled at the same time.

  I just misunderstand the features to compile farm Toolkit or is it an installation problem?

  Thank you

  No, a unique compilation cannot be shared between workers. Nature of the beast-FPGA "compilation" is not something that lends itself to parallelism. You have the advantage that the build tools run much faster under linux, however.

• Question of server FPGA compile

  Hello

  I want to implement a system of compilation farm. There is only a PC development (possibly 1 later) and compiles a worker. The question is, the compile Server (one which dishes to the worker of the compilation of the tasks) possible on the same PC used for development, and in the affirmative, he introduced the bottleneck important compared to using a dedicated machine?

  Thank you

  Hi ToeCutter,

  The compile server can be on the same PC that is used for development without any problem

  ' ' ' ' Refer to the getting started with the FPGA document compile farm, available by selecting Start "all programs" National Instruments "FPGA" start-up of the farm to compile FPGA, for more information about configuring and using FPGA compile farm.

  Use "localhost" as the host name of the server for your compilations to compile.

  Compile farm server uses the same compiling installed tools (Xilinx) on your PC, but instead to directly obtain the LabVIEW project files

  It compiles the files downloaded by the user, there is no difference in performance.

  I hope that helps!

  Kind regards

• FPGA compile Server Corruption

  Background:

  I have an installation of Windows 7 64 bit running on an i7-930.  In Oct. I installed LabVIEW FPGA 2009 SP1 build server from a copy of the .iso image of NEITHER.

  In addition, I have VMWare Player installed with the full development suite installed, targeting the server hosts compile.

  We book this system into 'production' for the 3 months preceding the feast of the new year...

  Question:

  When I returned from vacation, not a single machine in the factory can hit the compile server on Win7 host, including installed VMWare LV tools running on the same PC.  It seems that the clock carried over from 2010 to 2011, and the compile server went poof!  Initially, the compile Server complained that Xilinx tools license had expired.  Once I reinstalled the server compilation, nothing can connect to it, not the server errors, delays network comes from the development tool.

  Troubleshooting:

  Obvious things:

  ' 1) ' reboot ' on the VMWare image and host; no change,.

  (2) double check anti-virus is disabled; no change,.

  (3) check the Windows Firewall is disabled; no change,.

  VMware, other servers in fine compilation on the work of the other PC on the network (for VMWare isn't the issue, but played with bridged vs NAT anyway; without change).

  VMware, the 'local host' compiles Server works very well (remember, it's that of virtualization, it doesn't have the VM host on Win7 version).

  Reinstall the server compilation; no change.

  But here's where things get funky.  The IVR folder with the compile server has only a handful of files it contains with no record.  On the other compiling work servers, IVR file is loaded with support files files.  It's as if the installer does not install all the files right...

  Copy IVR system folder of work on top of the half installed folder; no change.  Bluff installation and start fresh with another to continue troubleshooting (this has been done a lot)...

  Do the various Registry hacks to take away the remains of uninstall process and align with the work of compiling server machines registers; no change.

  Walked through the Knowledge Base of NI.com and Forums.  Several issues that either I solved with relocations, left unanswered, or have been resolved without getting clarification on exactly what happened or how to fix it.

  A run the TList hack manually (difficulty TList.vi does not unless you have the run-time installed LabVIEW and my Win7 OS host does not work). no change.

  Hunting the Perflib fix rabbit in this hole; no change.

  Next steps:

  Will try to install it from another copy of the DVD LVFPGA in case my .iso image have fried or 'cleaned' by McAfee.

  Any ideas?  I would like to avoid reimage your computer for a number of practical reasons, including not seen the Win7 install DVD without invoking the wrath of it, tape / associated explanations invoking it or the huge amount of time lost in this process (and the square itself)...

  I saw a funny similar behavior when you use a server remote compilation when VMware gets thrown into the mix.

  My specific case was:

  Windows XP (32 bit) Welcome + to compile the server

  Reviews of Windows XP (32 bit) + LV development system (bridged network operation)

  Under certain conditions (I couldn't understand what was the trigger), LV development system could not connect to the server for compilation. Boost LV and even the virtual machine it ran into would not solve the issue. Moving the server to another physical machine compilation does not resolve the issue.

  All firewalls was extinguished without a change in behavior.

  I ended up resorting to statically assigning the port that the server remote compilation using this KB works on:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/BE02DC97330CD1D8862576A500015AB8

  Once set, all my LV development environments have been configured to use static port. I have not seen the problem since. I think there may be some problems with Service Locator of NEITHER when dealing with VMware.

  It doesn't sound like you are experiencing exactly the same problem, but this can give you more options to try.

• FPGA Compilation fails because of the mistake of Xilinx

  My FPGA compiles and I cannot understand why. There is nothing crazy in my FPGA VI of really, it seems strange to have this type of problem. I can't reach the code because its owner, but it's pretty simple because it reads all channels from a single module and records them in a data FIFO. I have compiled successfully any FPGA code on this computer, so I should definitely have everything needed to compile.

  My system consists of one NOR cRIO 9030 with a single module 9220. Below is the Compilation of summaries.

  ---

  LabVIEW FPGA: Compilation failed due to an error of Xilinx.

  Details:
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:295]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinksize is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:296]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:301]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:302]
  INFO: [Synth 8-2810] pkgshimswitchedlinkdmaportifc unit ignored due to previous errors [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:68]
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Development of finished RTL: time (s): UC = 00:00:07. delay = 00:00:31. Memory (MB): peak = 798.605; gain = 204.203
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.
  INFO: [Common 17-83] release license: synthesis
  3 info, 0 Warnings, 0 critical warnings and 4 errors.
  synth_design failed
  : ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.

  When running
  «source - notrace.» /. Xil/Vivado-6035-ip-10-60-203-176/realtime/toplevel_gen.tcl ".
  called inside
  «synth_design-top "toplevel_gen" - part "xc7k70tfbg676-1"-"full" flatten_hierarchy "»»
  (file "/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl" line 21)
  called inside
  "source" / opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl "" "
  exit #.
  INFO: [Common 17-206] exit Vivado at Tue Mar 24 23:58:54 2015...

  Compile time
  ---------------------------
  Introduction date: 24/03/2015-16:46
  Date recovered results: 24/03/2015-17:00
  Waiting time in the queue: 00:24
  Compilation of time: 13:22
  -Generate a Xilinx IP: 00:00
  -Summarize - Vivado: 01:27

  Compilation has restarted on
  24/03/2015-16:57

  ---

  Any help would be much appreciated!

  Thank you

  James.Morris wrote:

  Okay, so it seems that I get the error with a project from scratch and an FPGA with a single command and an indicator.

  I download the latest FPGA 2014 SP1 installation and I hope that will solve my problem.

  Well I'll mend, which fixed the problem! Somewhere along the line, my install FPGA must be corrupted.

  Thanks for the help, guys.

• Why is the FPGA Compiler server so slow?

  FPGA Cloud compiler is faster because NO servers are performing, right?
  Well, my Windows 7 PC is powerful, but no luck there!

  Total CPU utilization is never more than 25% and the total memory (including other applications) usage is less than 16%.
  Why, the compile Server uses all available resources? has been restricted?
  How can I leverage more power from my PC?

  If servers OR compile faster code, there must be a plausible explanation / reason?
  Please indicate, how to make the compile server running faster in place?

  I don't know what machines compilation cloud service works, but I do not.

  It seems that the compilation is much faster on a Linux machine on a Windows machine (I think I've heard up to 30% faster). The Linux FPGA compile server is available for LV2012. Set up a Linux machine with a clock high enough CPU and RAM speed and you will get on the fastest possible compilation with current tools.

• tables of fixed size in FPGA compilation error - how to implement a waveform control in an FPGA?

  Hello

  After being stuck for two days, please let me briefly describe my project and the problem:

  I want to use the cRIO FPGA for iterative control of waveforms. I want to capture a full period of the waveform, subtracting a reference waveform period and apply control algorithms on this. Subsequently the new period of correction must be sent again for the output module OR. If it does not work, the captured waveform will look like the one reference after several iterations.

  I am planing to create an array of size fixed for the capture and the reference waveform (each around 2,000 items for a given period). I use so 2 paintings of each elements of 2000. I use the function 'replace the subset of table' to update each element captured in the loop sampling and a feedback for each table node to keep in memory (I also tried shift registers, but then the berries do not have a fixed size any more and I can't start the compilation process).

  If I try to compile the FPGA vi, I get the following error:

  Details:
  ERRORortability:3 - Xilinx this application runs out of memory or met a memory conflict.  Use of current memory is 4167696 KB.  You can try to increase physical or virtual memory of your system.  If you are using a Win32 system, you can increase your application from 2 GB to 3 GB memory using the 3 G switch in your boot.ini file. For more information, please visit Xilinx answer Record #14932. For technical support on this issue, you can open a WebCase with this project attached to http://www.xilinx.com/support.
  "Synthesize - XST" process failed

  Before I added berries to my code I could compile the FPGA without problems. So, it seems that the tables are too big for the FPGA. :-(

  Therefore, I would like to ask if there is perhaps a better method to implement my problem in LabVIEW FPGA? How could avoid the tables to save my waveforms on a period?

  Thanks a lot for your help in advance.

  Best regards

  Andreas

  Unfortunately, the LabVIEW FPGA compiler cannot deduct stores shipped from berries (yet). When you create these two large paintings, you are creating essentially several registers very, very large. Just by looking at your picture, I guess that there are at least 4 copies of each of the tables.

  You want to use LabVIEW FPGA memories instead. You can create memories outside the loop and then read/write them where you are currently referencing the berries. The only change that you really need to do is to break down your treatment in scalar operations. I have attached a simplified version of your plan, I hope it helps. Let us know if you have any other questions.

  

• Can be de-compiled JavaFX applications?

  I'm a former developer of Silverlight and I just discovered JavaFX 2.0. I'd like to build some applications that would be delivered in browser applications, and I wonder about how secure my source code is a JavaFX application.
  
  In the world of Silverlight apps could be décompilés, so the best recommendation to protect your source code was using a utility of obfuscation. Would that be true here in JavaFX world too?

  JavaFX = Java. And Java classes can be décompilés, Yes. Obfuscation is the best way to protect the code; "do not give a hoot" is another. This has little to do with Silverlight or JavaFX, it's an inherent problem of applications that work under the customer they can be divided into. The only real way to protect against the theft of code is to do what you want to be protected on a server and display it as a service.

• How can I make double click to single click to open files?

  How can I make double click to single click to open files?

  See:

  • http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/10117-single-click-double-click-Open-item.html

• HP Officejet 8600 more - it can scan multiple pages on a single attachment?

  The HP Officejet 8600 more there (HP Solutions) software so that it can scan multiple pages on a single attachment running Windows 7?  Can you tell me the difference between Pro and Premium?

  Hello @Popi, with this printer, you don't have the Solution Center. Although you don't have the 8600 icon on your desktop. It is exactly the same as the Solution Center. The newer printers have an image of the printer rather than the solution Center. It's exactly the same thing.

• How can I activate the split screen?

  How can I activate the split screen?

  Slide down from the top of the screen, to about halfway or remove an application open to the left of the screen.

  When you have the app in a small floating window under your finger move it to the left or right of the screen and drop it when we see the appearance of separation bar.

  Steve

• Can I get a configuration of single language somewhere? How can I find the license key for my installation.

  Original title: single language of windows 8

  I had 8 single language on dell inspiron 15-3521 pre-installed windows. I did repartitioning disks and windows recovery options 8 as 'reset your pc' and "Refresh your pc" has stopped working, saying that the not found recovery partition, but it was intact. I have no recovery disk.

  Can I get a configuration of single language somewhere? How can I find the license key for my installation.

  Hi Mohammed'metwally,.

  Please answer this question to get more clarity on this issue.

  • The application or program that you use the partition of the drive?

  This problem may occur if the partition table is damaged or altered. As a result, the recovery partition does not work. I'm sorry to know that you are facing this problem.

  You will not get the unique language anywhere to download setting. You have an OEM computer that comes with the product key integrated into the BIOS. The product key of Windows 8 on new machines is now integrated in the machine. It uses the Secure Boot technology. When you perform a new installation of Windows 8, the installation program ask a product key and will be automatically get it from your system and proceed with the installation.

  As Windows 8 came pre-installed, you must contact the manufacturer of the computer with this problem for more help.

  http://en.Community.Dell.com/?~CK_=_mn

  Dell technical support: http://www.dell.com/support/contents/us/en/04/category/Contact-Information/Technical-Support?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04

  Thank you.

• The table can be outer joined to a single other table

  Hello

  Using oracle 11.2.0.3

  Select *.

  from tablea

  tableb

  tablec

  where tablea.col = tableb.col (+)

  and tablea.col = tablec.col (+)

  throws error table can be attached externally to another table.

  What is the best/recommended way to allow more than one outer join table?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Use ANSI join rating:

  SELECT *.

  FROM tablea a

  LEFT OUTER JOIN tableb b ON a.col = b.col

  LEFT OUTER JOIN tablec c ON a.col = c.col

  ;

  Are you sure the query you posted is really what you're running?  The query you posted shoulddn can't cause the error, because the tableb and tablec are each being only outside attached to 1 other table.  You get the error if the + signs were reversed in the two conditions.

  In any case, I suggest to use the ANSI syntax for all joins, especially outer joins.  You will never get the error "Table can be external attached to a single other table", and which is one of the reasons why it is better.

  I hope that answers your question.

  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data.

  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.

  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002

• Captivate in 8, can you apply an effect (for example, a transition) for the grouped shapes? (I can apply the effect to a single shape, but when I group forms, I can't understand how).

  Captivate in 8, can you apply an effect (for example, a transition) for the grouped shapes? (I can apply the effect to a single shape, but when I group forms, I can't understand how).

  Hello

  It is not possible to apply effects to groups of forms. You can apply the transition from the distribution panel and other properties in the property inspector.

  You will need to apply the same effect of the same duration for all objects in a group in this case.

  Thank you.

• You can host multiple sites on a single account webBasic?

  You can host multiple sites on a single account webBasic?

  Hello

  Basically not how it has been intended for.

  You have the option to have a partner account that you can create different sites in your portal where each site will be under its own plan.

  Or you have an existing account that is designed for a single site.  So I wouldn't say that, but ideally, you could add several domains under a plan account to a site, but you will then need to share the same account (a store of sense, a set of system messages, layout, etc.).

  These are the options at this point.

  I hope this helps!

  -Sidney