Question of FPGA compile farm 2012

Similar Questions

• Question of server FPGA compile

  Hello

  I want to implement a system of compilation farm. There is only a PC development (possibly 1 later) and compiles a worker. The question is, the compile Server (one which dishes to the worker of the compilation of the tasks) possible on the same PC used for development, and in the affirmative, he introduced the bottleneck important compared to using a dedicated machine?

  Thank you

  Hi ToeCutter,

  The compile server can be on the same PC that is used for development without any problem

  ' ' ' ' Refer to the getting started with the FPGA document compile farm, available by selecting Start "all programs" National Instruments "FPGA" start-up of the farm to compile FPGA, for more information about configuring and using FPGA compile farm.

  Use "localhost" as the host name of the server for your compilations to compile.

  Compile farm server uses the same compiling installed tools (Xilinx) on your PC, but instead to directly obtain the LabVIEW project files

  It compiles the files downloaded by the user, there is no difference in performance.

  I hope that helps!

  Kind regards

• tables of fixed size in FPGA compilation error - how to implement a waveform control in an FPGA?

  Hello

  After being stuck for two days, please let me briefly describe my project and the problem:

  I want to use the cRIO FPGA for iterative control of waveforms. I want to capture a full period of the waveform, subtracting a reference waveform period and apply control algorithms on this. Subsequently the new period of correction must be sent again for the output module OR. If it does not work, the captured waveform will look like the one reference after several iterations.

  I am planing to create an array of size fixed for the capture and the reference waveform (each around 2,000 items for a given period). I use so 2 paintings of each elements of 2000. I use the function 'replace the subset of table' to update each element captured in the loop sampling and a feedback for each table node to keep in memory (I also tried shift registers, but then the berries do not have a fixed size any more and I can't start the compilation process).

  If I try to compile the FPGA vi, I get the following error:

  Details:
  ERRORortability:3 - Xilinx this application runs out of memory or met a memory conflict.  Use of current memory is 4167696 KB.  You can try to increase physical or virtual memory of your system.  If you are using a Win32 system, you can increase your application from 2 GB to 3 GB memory using the 3 G switch in your boot.ini file. For more information, please visit Xilinx answer Record #14932. For technical support on this issue, you can open a WebCase with this project attached to http://www.xilinx.com/support.
  "Synthesize - XST" process failed

  Before I added berries to my code I could compile the FPGA without problems. So, it seems that the tables are too big for the FPGA. :-(

  Therefore, I would like to ask if there is perhaps a better method to implement my problem in LabVIEW FPGA? How could avoid the tables to save my waveforms on a period?

  Thanks a lot for your help in advance.

  Best regards

  Andreas

  Unfortunately, the LabVIEW FPGA compiler cannot deduct stores shipped from berries (yet). When you create these two large paintings, you are creating essentially several registers very, very large. Just by looking at your picture, I guess that there are at least 4 copies of each of the tables.

  You want to use LabVIEW FPGA memories instead. You can create memories outside the loop and then read/write them where you are currently referencing the berries. The only change that you really need to do is to break down your treatment in scalar operations. I have attached a simplified version of your plan, I hope it helps. Let us know if you have any other questions.

  

• FPGA Compiler speed

  HY all!

  I have a few questions using Xilinx compiler tools.

  The reason why I want to use FPGA is to get the analog measurements of two modules NI 9205 and also filter these measures. Modules are configured to run in terminal diff mode, while the other parameters of this module are set to default values (+/-10 V etc.).

  2.1 when I try to compile the program easier - read one analog measurement every 150 US, see the figure below - just compilation takes too much time, namely fear for a few hours, specifically, compiling stucks on mapping. I followed my PC performance, processor is about 20% 3.84 GHz, while the memory is on 10% 31.9 GB. Q1: is it possible to configure the compiler to use as many resources as possible PC?

  

  I'll post probably questions once I managed to get this simpler program to work

  Thank you in advance!

  Best regards

  Marko.

  Hello
  What operating system do you use? I read somewhere on this forum that windows 8 and possibly windows 10 are not taken in charge by xilinx compilator.
  I have simular problem faceing with the compilation of the code. On Windows 8 compilation take over 50 minutes and not finished yet. Then tried to compile the same code on Windows 7 it only take 10 minutes.

• Why is the FPGA Compiler server so slow?

  FPGA Cloud compiler is faster because NO servers are performing, right?
  Well, my Windows 7 PC is powerful, but no luck there!

  Total CPU utilization is never more than 25% and the total memory (including other applications) usage is less than 16%.
  Why, the compile Server uses all available resources? has been restricted?
  How can I leverage more power from my PC?

  If servers OR compile faster code, there must be a plausible explanation / reason?
  Please indicate, how to make the compile server running faster in place?

  I don't know what machines compilation cloud service works, but I do not.

  It seems that the compilation is much faster on a Linux machine on a Windows machine (I think I've heard up to 30% faster). The Linux FPGA compile server is available for LV2012. Set up a Linux machine with a clock high enough CPU and RAM speed and you will get on the fastest possible compilation with current tools.

• FPGA Compilation fails because of the mistake of Xilinx

  My FPGA compiles and I cannot understand why. There is nothing crazy in my FPGA VI of really, it seems strange to have this type of problem. I can't reach the code because its owner, but it's pretty simple because it reads all channels from a single module and records them in a data FIFO. I have compiled successfully any FPGA code on this computer, so I should definitely have everything needed to compile.

  My system consists of one NOR cRIO 9030 with a single module 9220. Below is the Compilation of summaries.

  ---

  LabVIEW FPGA: Compilation failed due to an error of Xilinx.

  Details:
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:295]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinksize is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:296]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:301]
  ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:302]
  INFO: [Synth 8-2810] pkgshimswitchedlinkdmaportifc unit ignored due to previous errors [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:68]
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Development of finished RTL: time (s): UC = 00:00:07. delay = 00:00:31. Memory (MB): peak = 798.605; gain = 204.203
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.
  INFO: [Common 17-83] release license: synthesis
  3 info, 0 Warnings, 0 critical warnings and 4 errors.
  synth_design failed
  : ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.

  When running
  «source - notrace.» /. Xil/Vivado-6035-ip-10-60-203-176/realtime/toplevel_gen.tcl ".
  called inside
  «synth_design-top "toplevel_gen" - part "xc7k70tfbg676-1"-"full" flatten_hierarchy "»»
  (file "/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl" line 21)
  called inside
  "source" / opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl "" "
  exit #.
  INFO: [Common 17-206] exit Vivado at Tue Mar 24 23:58:54 2015...

  Compile time
  ---------------------------
  Introduction date: 24/03/2015-16:46
  Date recovered results: 24/03/2015-17:00
  Waiting time in the queue: 00:24
  Compilation of time: 13:22
  -Generate a Xilinx IP: 00:00
  -Summarize - Vivado: 01:27

  Compilation has restarted on
  24/03/2015-16:57

  ---

  Any help would be much appreciated!

  Thank you

  James.Morris wrote:

  Okay, so it seems that I get the error with a project from scratch and an FPGA with a single command and an indicator.

  I download the latest FPGA 2014 SP1 installation and I hope that will solve my problem.

  Well I'll mend, which fixed the problem! Somewhere along the line, my install FPGA must be corrupted.

  Thanks for the help, guys.

• Several Questions about Visual Studio Express 2012

  Hi, I have several questions about Visual Studio Express 2012.

  1 is. each product (for the Web, Windows Phone, Windows 8, for office, etc) of Visual Studio Express 2012 using the individual installation package? Do I have to do the installation for each product? Is there an integrated package for all these products?

  2. the IDE of Visual Studio Express 2012 there a difference with other versions of charges, such as automatic and semiautomatic filling?

  3. don't Surface Pro 128 G meets the minimum hardware requirements for Visual Studio 2012 requirements and Visual Studio 2012 runs smoothly on Surface Pro?

  4. What is the difference between full MSDN and essential version in detail?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Please post any questions about Visual Studio on the following forums.

  Category Visual Studio:

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/VisualStudio

  Concerning

• Can farm FPGA compilation split a single compilation?

  Hello

  With a farm license LabVIEW compiles, a unique compilation can be divided between several machines for significant acceleration, or what a machine by compilation?

  Thank you

  No, what a machine by compilation. However, you can make a single machine compiles several speeding up average compiles experience.

• Results of FPGA compilation and size required FPGA

  Hi all

  I currently use an intelligent data acquisition card (7853R) to generate the AO modulated on five channels to five different densities.  The modulated signal can be either: a sinusoidal signal, a square wave, or a wave form defined by the user using a single READ (40 k, points 16-bit).  The card I am currently using is ready by OR, and I am now faced with buying my own. Initially, I had proposed using the7841R, as it does not appear that we would be using one of the largest FPGAS to their full potential.  And for the most part, we are not.  We use about 6% of the slice of registers and 6% of the LUTs.  However, we use 100% of the IOBs LOCed (who previous knowledge base said that I would not be concerned with) and 96% of the RAM36_EXPs.  Unfortunately, I have no documentation on these and can't know if my code fits on most small (wx30) FPGA in the 7841R.  If I had to guess, I would say I use 96% of the RAM on the current FPGA block and my code would have hard on the smaller FPGA, as is the block of RAM available< half="" of="" that="" on="" the="" larger. ="" but,="" i="" don't="" think="" it="" is="" that="" simple. ="" does="" anyone="" have="" any="" thoughts="" on="">

  Thanks, Matt

  I know not what it is either, but you can always choose the destination in LabVIEW and compile the application. you don't need hardware for it. Try it and then you should be able to make a purchase decision. Of course, someone of OR should be able to get back to you on the definition of the attribute. or I'll just say: ask him when you call to buy the product. If you have any questions, please after return.

• Installation of the Module LabVIEW 2012 SP1 FPGA with LabVIEW 2012 SP1 64 bit on Windows 7 X 64 machine.

  I installed 32-bit and 64-bit LabVIEW 2012 SP1 on Windows 7 X 64 computer. After that, I installed SP1 FPGA Module. While module FPGA completely installed in the 32-bit version and could develop projects fpga, FPGA interface has not installed the 64-bit version. Anyone had this before question?

  The document 5WMF8NQ2 knowledge base says it's doable.

  I have tried to repair the installed module, remove and then reinstall the module. Nothing helped me to get the FPGA interface on a 64-bit host VI. Any suggestions? Addition of the individual screws through the range of editing functions like a tedious process and the palette is not completely functional.

  I solved the problem. Had to repair each driver separately for LabVIEW 2012 SP1 64 bit installed on the default drive. You may need to copy paste files to the folder that it installed in function.

• FPGA compile Server Corruption

  Background:

  I have an installation of Windows 7 64 bit running on an i7-930.  In Oct. I installed LabVIEW FPGA 2009 SP1 build server from a copy of the .iso image of NEITHER.

  In addition, I have VMWare Player installed with the full development suite installed, targeting the server hosts compile.

  We book this system into 'production' for the 3 months preceding the feast of the new year...

  Question:

  When I returned from vacation, not a single machine in the factory can hit the compile server on Win7 host, including installed VMWare LV tools running on the same PC.  It seems that the clock carried over from 2010 to 2011, and the compile server went poof!  Initially, the compile Server complained that Xilinx tools license had expired.  Once I reinstalled the server compilation, nothing can connect to it, not the server errors, delays network comes from the development tool.

  Troubleshooting:

  Obvious things:

  ' 1) ' reboot ' on the VMWare image and host; no change,.

  (2) double check anti-virus is disabled; no change,.

  (3) check the Windows Firewall is disabled; no change,.

  VMware, other servers in fine compilation on the work of the other PC on the network (for VMWare isn't the issue, but played with bridged vs NAT anyway; without change).

  VMware, the 'local host' compiles Server works very well (remember, it's that of virtualization, it doesn't have the VM host on Win7 version).

  Reinstall the server compilation; no change.

  But here's where things get funky.  The IVR folder with the compile server has only a handful of files it contains with no record.  On the other compiling work servers, IVR file is loaded with support files files.  It's as if the installer does not install all the files right...

  Copy IVR system folder of work on top of the half installed folder; no change.  Bluff installation and start fresh with another to continue troubleshooting (this has been done a lot)...

  Do the various Registry hacks to take away the remains of uninstall process and align with the work of compiling server machines registers; no change.

  Walked through the Knowledge Base of NI.com and Forums.  Several issues that either I solved with relocations, left unanswered, or have been resolved without getting clarification on exactly what happened or how to fix it.

  A run the TList hack manually (difficulty TList.vi does not unless you have the run-time installed LabVIEW and my Win7 OS host does not work). no change.

  Hunting the Perflib fix rabbit in this hole; no change.

  Next steps:

  Will try to install it from another copy of the DVD LVFPGA in case my .iso image have fried or 'cleaned' by McAfee.

  Any ideas?  I would like to avoid reimage your computer for a number of practical reasons, including not seen the Win7 install DVD without invoking the wrath of it, tape / associated explanations invoking it or the huge amount of time lost in this process (and the square itself)...

  I saw a funny similar behavior when you use a server remote compilation when VMware gets thrown into the mix.

  My specific case was:

  Windows XP (32 bit) Welcome + to compile the server

  Reviews of Windows XP (32 bit) + LV development system (bridged network operation)

  Under certain conditions (I couldn't understand what was the trigger), LV development system could not connect to the server for compilation. Boost LV and even the virtual machine it ran into would not solve the issue. Moving the server to another physical machine compilation does not resolve the issue.

  All firewalls was extinguished without a change in behavior.

  I ended up resorting to statically assigning the port that the server remote compilation using this KB works on:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/BE02DC97330CD1D8862576A500015AB8

  Once set, all my LV development environments have been configured to use static port. I have not seen the problem since. I think there may be some problems with Service Locator of NEITHER when dealing with VMware.

  It doesn't sound like you are experiencing exactly the same problem, but this can give you more options to try.

• LabVIEW fpga compile: translation error then again translate

  Hello everyone,

  I have a question about the process of compiling LV FPGA.

  The context:

  I am compiling a binary FPGA for the NOR-5644R (viterx6 inisde). the process is quite long (up to 7 hours depending on how is our CLIP). I am canvassing any idea of attaching the compilation process.

  The fact:

  By analyzing the log file of the previous compilation, I noticed that the stage translate is made twice, probably because one is a failure. the excerpt from log files are copy/paste below.

  Further, it seems the errors (at least some of them) translate the first are induced by the commented lines of NOR provided file UCF (RfRioFpga.ucf)

  The question:

  Why to translate step to do it twice (the first being failed)? would it not quicker to make only the second succefull one? in other words, it is really necessary for the first fails to translate step for the FPGA binay?

  Any ideas?

  Thanks in advance!

  See you soon,.

  Patrice

  ----

  log file extract 1:

  "...

  NGDBUILD Design summary of results:
  Error number: 387
  Number of warnings: 1443

  Total in time REAL until the end of the NGDBUILD: 2 h 16 min 45 s
  Time CPU until total NGDBUILD: 2 h 11 min 21 sec

  One or more errors were found during the NGDBUILD. No file NGD will be written.

  Writing the file of log NGDBUILD 'RfRioFpga.bld '...

  'Translate' process failed

  ..."

  log file excerpt 2:

  "...

  NGDBUILD Design summary of results:
  Number of errors: 0
  Number of warnings: 818

  Writing the file 'RfRioFpga.ngd '... NGD
  Total in time REAL until the end of the NGDBUILD: 29 min 17sec
  Time CPU until total NGDBUILD: 27 min 33sec

  Writing the file of log NGDBUILD 'RfRioFpga.bld '...

  NGDBUILD done.

  'Translate' process completed successfully

  ..."

  Hi Patrice,

  It seems strange that it performs this step two times (and was worried when I saw the first time), but there is good reason for that, certainly.  LabVIEW inserts constraints for components, he adds, but sometimes the components get optimized out by the compiler.  When the compiler encounters stressed that points to the now non-existent component, it error.  LabVIEW circumvents this by running the process to translate two times. The first time, it may fail. LabVIEW will remove the constraints that fail, then run again translate it.  Unfortunately there is no way around this problem.

• General questions about FPGA Interface C API 2.0

  I developed an application in LabVIEW FPGA 2011 on a Board of the R-Series PXI and a host application LabVIEW 2011 Windows XP to communicate with him via DMA FIFO.  I'm trying to adapt the interface to CVI 8.1 (preferred) or CVI 2009 using the Interface of FPGA C API 2.0.  The example of FIFO that it stores in the directory C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\National Instruments\FPGA Interface C API\Examples\ gave me a few questions:

  1. The functions NiFpga_WriteFifoI16 and NiFpga_AcquireFifoWriteElementsI16 are two different ways to do the same thing? I wasn't clear where I do the extra copy if you use NiFpga_WriteFifoI16. I guess the combination of NiFpga_AcquireFifoWriteElementsI16 with NiFpga_ReleaseFifoElements is the way to go if I want to stay out of trouble.
  2. I intend to call NiFpga_Initialize and NiFpga_Open in an initialization function that gives the word initially, then keep the session handle in calls to other functions.  The session handle is always not null when it opens successfully?  Could I use it as a test to make sure that I have a session valid before calling any other functions-example:
     If (session) {NiFpga_WriteFifoI16 (...)}
  3. Interface of FPGA C API 2.0 is only announced work in CVI 2009 up on.  If I include NiFpga.c and .h in my project CVI 8.1, it seems to compile fine, but I did have the chance to integrate yet.  Is there something specific that would make CVI 8.1 not work?  Our deployment environment of difficult application CVI upgrades

  -Jim

  Jim,

  With regard to your questions:

  1. Yes, these two functions are the same, however there is a big difference between the two. NiFpga_AcquireFifoWriteElementsI16 acquires, prepares and publishes FIFO elements to avoid the need to write the first in a buffer allocated by the separate user, then copy the contents of the elements in the memeory host buffer. Considering that, in the NiFpga_WriteFifoI16 does not work. So the NiFpga_ReleaseFifoElements should always be used with the NiFpga_WriteFifoI16. The example is just showing how the code should be used, but is not necessarily displayed works should be used together. I understand perfectly why he was confusing.

  2. the best way to ensure you have a valid session is by using the NiFpga_IsNotError() function. I've attached a screenshot of the example code that illustrates how best to achieve this and inserted the image below.

  

  3 regarding using CVI 8.1, there is nothing in particular, which would make your code does not work in point 8.1, but we can guarantee that C API 2.0 will work correctly with 9.0.

  Kind regards

  Larry H.

• Questions about Macbook Pro mid 2012 (Non-retine)

  Hi all

  I think to buy my second MacBook.

  Currently, I have a MacBook Air mid 2013.

  It's screen/flash storage is a little on the small side for me.

  Then I watched www.apple.com/benl and sought an Apple laptop that fits my needs.

  And I fell on the MacBook Pro Non-retine (bottom of the page for MacBook Pro)

  So my questions are:

  Estimated life: it will last at least 2-3 years with what I'll do with it. (Read below for my needs)

  It will be always fast enough, there is no need to be fast, but the average speed is necessary (startup time doesn't really matter unless it's longer than 5 minutes).

  How long he will be out of date it will get most recent OS X updates for couple preferably 2-3 years.

  Is it possible to perform the following operations on this MacBook Pro (my needs):

  Some games like: GTA V (on lowest settings), Borderlands, Minecraft, Euro Truck Simulator 2,... (GTA V is working on my MacBook Air but must run from external HARD disk).

  Run Windows 7 in BootCamp.

  Surf the web

  Watch YouTube videos in 1080 p/720 p

  Basic PhotoShop

  I'm not going to do things:

  Edit video.

  Record Gameplay videos.

  Should what configuration I:

  Cheaper, configuration of stock or choose for Core i7 and 8 GB of RAM I don't need an SSD (it's small, expensive).

  I "need" core i7 and 8 GB of RAM or only 8 GB of RAM or only Core i7, just stock or stock with 8 GB of RAM.

  Thanks in advance!

  The environment welcome Sven Missorten

  AKA TheGamer3399

  You can watch in Macs, refurbished Apple . These are like new only to an economy and you might find a slightly more than the current date to run Windows 7 in Bootcamp. A mid-2012 will take place in Windows 7 in Bootcamp. I bought 3 Mac (Mac Mini, 2 - MBP retinas) in the past and have never had a problem. They carry the same warranty that any new Mac. I think that any Mac you buy is easily past 2-3 years with what you want to run.

  In the list of the things you mentioned, if you get a 2015 model, you will not be able to run Windows 7 in Bootcamp. You pouvez run it in a Virtual Machine like Parallels Desktop 11. I have a retinal model of 2015 and Bootcamp can only setup for Windows 8 and more. So, I run Windows 7 and 10 in a VM using Parallels Desktop. Personally, I would not run any graphics intensive games on your laptop, but you certainly can if you don't mind hearing that run the fans.

  Certainly, 8 GB of RAM (minimum) with a 256 GB or larger SSD drive. You can do what others are doing and future proof your Mac by getting 16 GB or RAM. Current models have bus PCIe for flash storage and it's fast! I had a late 2012 with flash SATA storage retina and my current 2015 beginning with PCIe is much faster. Insofar as an Intel i5 or i7, it's really you. With what you mentioned, the i7 would probably be a good choice.

• ERROR: TclTasksC:process_077: in the FPGA Compilation

  Hi all

  I use for my application in which I am facing following error when compiling my fpga code compact rio 9072:

  Compilation failed due to an error of Xilinx.

  Details:
  ERROR: TclTasksCrocess_077: did not finish. Please, look in the newspaper and report files.false
  When running
  "process run"card.
  (file "C:\NIFPGA\jobs\XI64xG6_My449tj\map.tcl" line 6)

  ERRORack:2310 - type compositions "SLICEL" too found to adapt to this device.
  ERRORack:18 - the design is too large for the device and package.
  Please see the Design summary section to see the cost estimates for
  your design exceeds the resources available in the device.
  NOTE: A file NCD will be always generated to allow you to examine the mapped
  Design.  This file is intended for assessment use only and will not be processed
  successfully through NOMINAL.
  This NCD mapped file can be used to assess how the logic of the design has been
  mapped in FPGA logic resources.  It can also be used to analyze
  preliminary to the level logic (route pre) calendar with one of the static electricity of Xilinx
  analysis of synchronization (PRHT or Timing Analyzer) tools.
  Summary of the design:
  Error number: 2
  Number of warnings: 69
  Use of logic:
  Number of slice Flip Flops: 7 886 on 15 360 51%
  Number of 4-input lut: 16 104 on 15 360 104% (OVERMAPPED)
  Distribution of logic:
  Number of slots occupied: 8 744 7 680 113% (OVERMAPPED)
  Number of slices only related logical container: 8 744 100% 8 744
  Number of slices that contains no logical relationship: 0 to 8 744 0%
  * See NOTES below for an explanation of the effects of unrelated logic.
  Total number of 4 input lut: 17 400 on 15 360 113% (OVERMAPPED)
  Number used as logic: 15 998
  Number used as a middle way: 1 296
  Number used as Rams 16 x 1: 82
  Used number recorded the shift: 24
  The logical Distribution report slice is not significant if the design is
  too mapped to a resource not slices or if Placement fails.
  Number of IOBs servile: 183 on 333 54%
  BIO flip flops: 74
  Number of RAMB16s: 1 24 4%
  Number of MULT18X18s: 2 on 24 8%
  Number of BUFGMUXs: 4 to 8 50%
  Number of DCMs: 1 on 4 25%
  Fanout of the Non-horloge nets on average: 3.38
  Peak Memory use: 361 MB
  Total in time REAL in the completion of the card: 1 dry 12 mins
  Time CPU until the end of the total map: 1 dry 12 mins
  NOTES:
  Related logic is defined as logical that share connectivity - for example two
  Lut are "related" if they share common inputs.  During Assembly of the slices.
  Card gives priority to combine the logic that is related.  Generates so
  best performance of synchronization.
  Without logical report does share no connectivity.  Card will start only packing
  logic not related in a slice once that 99% of the slices are held through
  logical packaging partners.
  Note that once the logical distribution reaches the level of 99% by related
  logical packaging, this does not mean the device is completely used.
  No logical report package will begin, continuing until all usable LUTs
  and FFs are busy.  According to your timing budget, an increase in the concentrations of
  logical packaging unrelated can adversely affect the performance of timing set
  your design.
  Mapping performed.
  See the report of map file "toplevel_gen_map.mrp" for more details.
  Problem encountered during the packaging phase.
  Failure of the process 'Map '.

  Start time: 18:29:23
  End time: 18:44:42
  Total time: 00:15:19

  Can someone tell me why this error came?

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Vipin Ahuja

  Vipin Hello,

  It seems that your code requires more resources that are available on the FPGA. Optimizing your code can help to solve your problem:

  You may have noticed some "Overmapping", mentioned in the newspaper:

  Number of 4-input lut: 16 104 on 15 360 104% (OVERMAPPED)
  Distribution of logic:
  Number of slots occupied: 8 744 7 680 113% (OVERMAPPED)

  Take a look at this article:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/060BA89FE3A0119E48256E850048FFFE?OpenDocument

  And this:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/WebSearch/311C18E2D635FA338625714700664816?OpenDocument

  Kind regards

  Navjodh

  National Instruments