card crypto VPN 270 defined peer 12.2.3.4 12.5.6.7

Similar Questions

• Card crypto has incomplete registration message

  I'm working on the construction of a configuration on a 5540 running 9.1.2 for VPN L2L.  When I reboot the device, I get this message:

  . ATTENTION: card crypto has incomplete registrations

  Out of config line 10665, 'card crypto L2LVPN interfaces... ". »

  I seems that it gives me the error on the line where the encryption card is assigned to the external interface.  Unfortunately, this message is really not very useful.  I don't have it still in production. Is there a way that I can know where my problem maybe?

  Thank you.

  Jason

  Hello

  This indicates generally only a connection VPN L2L Crypto map configuration is missing a crucial parameter to make it complete.

  Then run the command

  See the crypto run map

  Then make sure the following lines exist

  address for correspondence card crypto

  card crypto defined peer

  set transform-set ikev1 crypto card

  If one of the 3 things mentioned above is missing then crypto map configuration is considered incomplete and does not have the information necessary for this VPN L2L to function.

  At least that is what it seems.

  It may be useful

  -Jouni

• card crypto access lists / problem if more than one entry?

  Access list for IPSec enabled traffic.

  I've been recently setting up a VPN between two sites and I came across the following problem:

  I wanted to install a VPN that only 2 posts from site A to site B, a class C network

  So I created a list of access as follows:

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.2 host 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  When I applied the access list above to map (match address 101) encryption, I quickly realized that only the first host (192.168.0.1) was successfully encrypted beeing while the other could not. I've been geeting on ipsec debugging errors saying that traffic to 192.168.0.2 denyed by the access list.

  When I changed the access list above with the following

  access-list 101 permit IP 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  two items of work could successfully encrypted through IPSec tunnel.

  To look further into it, I realized that only the first entry of the IPsec access list has been really tested for the corresponding traffic!

  Is this a normal behavior or a known Bug? No work around for this problem?

  Kind regards.

  If you have ipsec-manual crypto map in crypto ACL, you can specify that an ACE. Check 12.2 docs:

  Access lists for labelled as ipsec-manual crypto map entries are limited to a single permit entry and the following entries are ignored. In other words, the security associations established by this particular entry card crypto are only for a single data stream. To be able to support several manually created security for different types of traffic associations, define multiple crypto access lists and then apply each a separate entrance card crypto ipsec-manual. Each access list should include a statement to define which traffic to protect.

• IPsec VPN cannot remove peer

  HY there

  I have configured an IPsec tunnel, but I have an error to connect.

  This is my setup and the error I have is

  4

  January 9, 2013

  00:53:00

  713903

  Group = CON_trabajadores, IP = 81.43.96.53, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry

  4 January 9, 2013

  00:53:06

  713902

  Group = CON_trabajadores, IP = 81.43.96.53, Removing peer to peer table does not, no match!

  access-list split_tunel_CON_trabajadores note conexionIPsec

  standard access list split_tunel_CON_trabajadores allow 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

  Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  peer set card crypto outside_map 1 201.238.197.253

  map outside_map 1 set of transformation-ESP-DES-MD5 crypto

  outside_map card crypto 1 set nat-t-disable

  card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_2_cryptomap

  peer set card crypto outside_map 2 190.41.143.165

  card outside_map 2 game of transformation-ESP-DES-MD5 crypto

  outside_map card crypto 2 set nat-t-disable

  card crypto outside_map 3 match address outside_3_cryptomap

  peer set card crypto outside_map 3 200.59.12.152

  card crypto outside_map 3 game of transformation-ESP-DES-MD5

  outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  the Encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 1

  life 86400

  IP pool local AccesoRemoto

  internal CON_trabajadores group strategy

  attributes of Group Policy CON_trabajadores

  value of DNS SERVER DNS server

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  split tunnel - policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list split_tunnel_CON_trabajadores

  value of Split-dns SERVER DNS

  address-pools value AccesoRemoto

  type tunnel-group CON_trabajadores remote access

  attributes global-tunnel-group CON_trabajadores

  address pool AccesoRemoto

  Server Group of NPS authentication (with Ray pointing to an ad)

  Group Policy - by default-CON_trabajadores

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group CON_trabajadores

  pre-shared key *.

  Disable ISAKMP keepalive

  attributes of Group Policy CON_trabajadores

  value of group-lock CON_trabajadores

  The configuration of your ASA for IKE must match with one of the Proposals of IKE of the Cisco VPN Client. Depending on your config above, you use THE then MD5 to match IKE for the VPN Client proposal, you need to use Group 2 Diffie-Hellman. (click on the link for the valid combination of proposals of the IKE Client VPN)

• How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use?

   ip access-list extended ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 permit ip 10.0.12.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.22.0 0.0.0.255 ! crypto isakmp policy 10 encr aes hash sha256 authentication pre-share group 14 crypto isakmp policy 20 encr aes 256 hash sha512 authentication pre-share group 16 crypto isakmp key cisco123 address 200.0.2.2 ! crypto ipsec transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 esp-aes esp-sha256-hmac mode tunnel ! crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2 11 ipsec-isakmp set peer 200.0.2.2 set transform-set [TRANS_SET]PHASE_2 match address ACL_SITE1_TO_SITE2 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 200.0.1.1 255.255.255.0 crypto map [CRYPT_MAP]VPN_SITE1_TO_SITE2

  How does Card Crypto knows what ISAKMP policy to use, or use of the ISAKMP policy at all?

  It comes from "ipsec-isakmp?

  I mean... I do not see any "set isakmp policy 10" in the Crypto map

  This is what he chooses just the top-down approach?

  As part of the negotiation of the phase 1 and is a top-down proposal based on the sequence number.  You can get the details in tunnel using configuration:

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  Cisco IOS has built/strategies default ISAKMP, but the pre 15.x versions were terrible default.  New default values are strong, although I still like to configure them myself.

• Card Crypto GETVPN on loopback

  Hello

  We have 6 WAN routers connected through MPLS ISP cloud, we must apply GET VPN between these WAN routers.

  We have 2 servers of keys (1800 routers), and WAN routers will act as members of the Group (6 GMs)

  The configuration files are attached for work typical configuration GETVPN (crypto map applied to the WAN interface)

  In the key server configuration, the crypto isakmp command uses the WAN IP of each router WAN (172.16.x.x) address, and since KS routers are connected to the local network (VSS), they should be able to join 172.16.X.X and therefore the subnet in 172.16.X.X is announced for the local network (check GM-configuration file under eigrp - connected redist)

  That's what our customers want to avoid! they don't want 172.16.X.X to make advertising for the local network.

  I know it's possible in the configuration GETVPN to configure, the command crypto isakmp for use the loopback address of the routers WAN instead of the WAN IP address, but in this case the card encryption should be applied to address loopback, and for this, all traffic to be encrypted and decrypted to go through the loopback on all routers WAN interfaces.

  I was wondering what is the best solution in this case, I have to use the config below on GM

  card crypto-address loopback 0
  

  TEST allowed 10 route map

  set interface Loopback0

  TEST IP policy route map-local

  But I don't know if it is correct, or there may be a better idea... so I thought share with you guys to discuss all the best ideas.

  Ali,

  We do not support cryptographic cards on loopback interfaces.

  Use the crypto-local address (in the case of vanilla IPsec) card or customer record interface (even if it is for another use) order under specifcy gdoi what inetrface or VRF you want to record source to / receive to generate a new key on.

  You can take a look at DIG:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6525/ps9370/ps7180/GETVPN_DIG_version_1_0_External.PDF

  section 4.2.1.2.3 and other talk.

  M.

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• seized correspondence interface card crypto

  I wonder if I put the command 'ip nat outside' to my external interface required before entering the cryto entry card "card crypto map name of the command?

  concerning

  Not necessary unless you're natting. Where the order will be as shown below

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml

• Question card crypto for VPN gateway router

  I'm moving my VPN environment at 2811 routers. I move a seller more tomorrow which has two sources who need to connect to each of our IPs, those inside the IPs are NAT had real IPS at the firewall behind the router. I know I'll find out tomorrow, but thought I would see if anyone see a problem with this ACL that is used for the encryption card, is there a problem with multiple sources (50.50.50.1 et.2 in file) connection to the same destinations? The IP addresses in this file are not real output IPs. Thank you.

  If I understand you correctly, no it should not be a problem at all. Each entry in your crypto ACLs card will create a separate IPSEC security association pair and there is no overlap.

  Let me know if I misunderstood your question.

  Jon

• VPN client and peer simultaneously with dynamic ip

  LAN (static ip) - to - Lan (static ip) is very well

  LAN (static ip) - to - Lan(static ip) + VPN Client is fine

  LAN (static ip) - to - Lan (dynamic ip) is very well

  LAN (static ip) - to - Client VPN is good

  LAN (static ip) - to - Lan(dynamic ip) + VPN Client does not work

  I think that the problem is due to this commans

  ISAKMP crypto keyname key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  or

  ISAKMP crypto keyname key address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 no.-xauth

  How can I distinguish a router with a dynamic ip address that doesn't require authentication from a VPN Client that requires authentication?

  P.D. I use local authentication

  You are right in your diagnosys of the problem, we see this from time to time and there is not much that can be done unfortunately.

  The only way is if the remote peer Gets a subnet or a dynamic address on a particular beach all the time, then add a line "isakmp key... No.-xauth" with this defined subnet. For example, if the remote peer always receives an address in 4.104.225.0/24, then do:

  > cry isa key address 4.104.225.0 255.255.255.0 no.-xauth

  Not much, but it's the only way around it.

• Card crypto on Interface Ethernet

  Hi all

  I don't have that much experience but with VPN configs, so maybe this question will seem a bit silly. I have a Cisco 831 that I use to connect via VPN to a remote site. Everything works fine.

  Then I wanted to add a second tunnel to another location. I did all the configs needed, applied card encryption on ethernet external and everything was fine, I could connect. But then I noticed that the new encryption card has actually replaced the existing one. Of course, the first VPN was no longer works.

  Is this a limitation of the 831? Or y at - it another way to configure them so I can use the two (or even more than two) at the same time? Do I need another Cisco router if I want more than a tunnel?

  Any help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Stefan

  This isn't a limitation of the router. But by design,.

  only one crypto map set can be assigned to an interface. If multiple crypto map entries have the same name but a different seq - num map, they are considered as part of the same set, and all apply to the interface.

  So what you need to do is create crypto-map with the same name for slot 2, but give a different sequence number. Apply this encryption card to the interface and it will work. From the seq - num lowest crypto card is considered to be the highest priority, and will be evaluated first.

• Card crypto applied to the Vlan Interface of the 1841 router

  Currently, our 1841 router has a T1 connected to the WIC T1, Comcast Cable connected to Fa0/0 and the local network connected to Fa0/1.  Tuesday, our 1841 will have an ethernet connection to a new gateway router instead of use the WIC T1.  I added a 4-port ethernet module to the router in the anticipation of this change.  Since the 4-port module is not layer 3 capable, I created a virtual local area network so that I can address the Vlan with the IP address that has been previously configured on the WIC T1.  My goal is to move our IPSec vpn tunnel interface series interface vlan newly created.  I was able to add all orders of the interface vlan, but I wanted to make sure that when the time comes to make the transition, the tunnel will be actually get when it is configured on an interface vlan that is then assigned to one of the four ethernet ports in the add-on.  Has anyone done this or seen that fact?  Potential drawbacks?  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  Crypto-map is compatible with the IVR, so if everything else is in place, it does not work.

  HTH

  Laurent.

• Card crypto withdrawing after reloading

  Hello

  I've just set up my site to site vpn with a tot Inbox pix and a cisco 3745.

  The pix box is good, but the 3745 every time I reload the card encryption is not applied to the interface after recharging.

  Hello

  I strongly suspect that this could be a bug in IOS on your 3745.

  try to update the IOS and test again.

  Search for bug

  CSCeb20989

• After update Android, camera not record not on SD card, or can be defined for this!

  Hi all

  I hope you have an answer to my problem:

  After upgrading Android Sony on my Xperia Z3compact, I can't find any more than the possibility for the camera (new version of Sony) to record directly onto my SD card!

  How can I find this setting?

  Kind regards

  Guy

  Hello

  Solution here.

  Since the update there is no more access to the settings with "Android 3 lines standard menu" above, but a 'wheel of the parameters' to the left.

  And when I opened these settings I had seen in any way the possible regulation of the setting to save to SD card.

  Check, the interface is far from intuitive and I didn't realize it was necessary for the Group of slide up to see the bottom of the menu, because no lift and no other sign was visible before I try to drag!

  In short, I finally found this setting by sliping as this menu from the top and I hope that this testimony will help others who would became so perplexed than me!
  Best regards
  Guy

• Area-based-Firewall: card crypto / tunnel interface / area?

  Hello

  We use a router CISCO1921-SEC. On the side "WAN", we have 1 public IP assigned by DHCP address.

  At present, we use the WAN Interface with a crypto-map as endpoint of some IPSec connections. We have created a zone - fire-with area "WAN" and "LAN". In this configuration, all IPSec parameters are on a single Interface - connection to the 'LAN' box can be managed through rulesets. What about the connections between IPSec connections and the area "self."

  We would like to finish each IPSec connection in a separate area. Is this a good idea?

  How can this be configured?

  Each of them on a "inetface tunnel" with binding "tunnel source...". » ?

  Please give us a clue... Thank you!!

  Message geändert durch NISITNETC

  When the tunnels are completed on the router, which is the area free, by default, all traffic is allowed, if you want to restrict access, you must create a free zone and add a pair of WAN area to auto.

  Hope this link will help you,

  http://INKLING/?q=node/1305