Choice of resolution Dell E630

Similar Questions

• Choice of resolution screen laptop E430 with gen 3, 4000 graphics

  Can someone with a gen 3 based E430 (such as the i5, 3210 m) which has the graphics of the 4000 series, please tell me what choices of less than 1366 x 768 screen resolution you get under display properties while watching on the screen of the phone (ex: 1024 x 600)?

  Thank you

  George

  Hi reefgeorge,

  Œuvres for integrated (E130 Intel 4000) and Nvidia (E430 Nvidia GT630/Intel 4000) model:
  800 X 600 1024 X 768 1280 X 600 1280 X 720 1280 X 768 1360 X 768 1366 X 768

  Fred

• U3014 + PS3. Problem with the display resolution?

  Hello!

  PS3 cannot expose to a resolution of the screen for Dell U3014. I use the HDMI-HDMI cable. In the attempt of a choice display resolution in the settings of the PS3 when it test the monitor may not issue image. This means that an installer of the screen may not be complete. Now the installation of the screen program gives 576 p. As you understand, it is impossible to play on it. Please help with a problem.

  Thank you.

  Niko7,

  The U3014 HDMI port can do 1920 x 1080 (1080 p).
  * With the monitor and the PS3 on and using a HDMI to HDMI (not a DVI to HDMI) cable right, turn off the PS3 via the power switch on the back and then turn back with this same switch
  * Press and hold the power button on the front of the PS3 until you hear 2 beeps. Once it turns on, the screen should display a message something like: "an HDMI cable has been detected, you want to set up?
  * Then go here to set the video output to your TV/monitor
  http://manuals.PlayStation.NET/document/en/PS3/current/settings/videooutput.html
  * When you go through Setup for HDMI setting, you will need to check what your monitor video output modes supported (480i/480 p/576i/576 p/720 p/1080i/1080 p)
  * After you go through the intial setting HDMI menu and displays your PS3 via HDMI cable, on the main menu of the PS3, go to settings and then scroll the display settings. In display settings, put the full range RGB (HDMI) to full and put Y Pb/Cb Pr/Cr super-white (HDMI) on we

• Screen with VGA adapter resolution problem

  When I connect the MacBook Air 13 (2016 10.11.3 running) to an external monitor via DVI, everything works well: automatically selects the optimal resolution for the external monitor, plus I have other choices of resolution, and everything is good. But when I connect via VGA, I can choose resolution 800 x 600, which is not only not optimal: it's awful.

  I get this same problem with 2 different VGA adapters and 2 different monitors, a 16:9 and the other 4:3. (16:9 screen spans 800 x 600, so it looks even worse.)

  This problem does not occur on MacBook Pro 13 (2011 also runs 10.11.3): VGA and DVI work very well, with selected automatically optimal resolutions, plus I have other choices of resolution.

  No idea how to fix this on the MacBook Air? Or is MacBook Air paralyzed by nature in this way?

  Thank you.

  Finally called Apple Support. Has worked with junior counsel, trying all kinds of things that did not work. After an hour of this, he handed me a Counsellor, who took me to the preference of views and had me select the "chipped" resolution key to with hold option key. It gave me a wide range of resolutions that had not been previously available, including the resolution that has ended up working real well. Phew!

• Dell and HD 5770 display port

  Maybe it's more a mug just about shot. I just bought two P2415q of dell monitors. They display only video via HDMI or a DP HDMI adapter. The only way I ever had video off the report of DP was once when I hot swapped the RFP while the HD5770 was still connected to DVI. Dell didn't write Mac drivers for this monitor only Windows. I'll probably just to return them.

  Actually there is no such thing as drivers of the Mac monitor. The Mac "detects" the features of the monitor/screen/projector/TV via a signal down the cable called EDID. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Display_Identification_Data

  Assuming that the computer - in this case a Mac monitor both and have a field then the Mac will choose a setting based on the monitor.

  In this case, you have a new 4K resolution Dell monitor and you try to use it with an old long abandoned video card. It is also important to know that the version of Mac OS X you are using on your Mac also has a great involvement on which will support the Mac. You don't say exactly what version of Mac OS X that you use, but your signature implies you use El Capitan 10.11.4 which of course is the most recent and current version. (Which is good news). Apple does on several versions have improve the support of 4K in their operating system, it necessarily would not help however if your video card is the problem.

  Now, I think I know the Dell P2415Q as I pointed above is a 4K monitor, I also know that he uses a Displayport interface, and I also know he uses a standard for 4K called OSH (Transport of single stream) and does not use the old standard 4K of TMS (Multi Transport Stream). The main difference is that with STD is more like two monitors 2 K-by-side and therefore two signals are sent down the cable, then merged by the monitor.

  This is important because while the SST is the newer and better version and according to MacVidCards AMD made video as a Radeon HD 7950 and Radeon HD 7970 cards work best with older MST than they do with SAFETY. Your video card is also a design of AMD, although another much older.

  It seems that you have two problems at the moment-

  1. AMD cards apparently peuvent have problems with views of OSH, it's only according to MacVidCards I did not report it to someone else and MacVidCards peuvent be exaggerating in order to beat the company extra selling their cards Nvidia
  2. More importantly, your card is so old that it is not officially supported on 4K at all according to AMD, see http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/5000/5770

  I found another article to a Mac user, which suggests they could get 4K working with a HD 5770 but only at 24 fps or 30 FPS and not at 50 or 60 frames per second. This Dell monitor may be keen to use 60 fps.

  I know of other reports here in these forums that many people have been able to use the Dell P2415Q with the Mac recent Macs with better video cards integrated, or an old classic Mac like yours but using a more recent version, best video card.

  So, I would say that want to consider buying a newer video card. See http://www.macvidcards.com/

• How can I fix my resolution when it will automatically from high to low?

  Since I installed my touchsmart 610-1180qd I had problems with passing automatically to 640 x 480 resolution.  When I try to change the resolution in the Control Panel, the resolution button is not highlighted. I have to turn on my computer works to return to the initial setting high resolution. I called technical support 4 - 5 times all ready without solution. I'll give them another call, but if anyone knows what is the problem, I would appreciate your help.

  I also have the same problem with the resolution of the screen change after the mode 'sleep'.  After being unable to find a solution to the problem on the internet, I have played around with my settings and have found what seems to be a viable solution (at least for me).  I say this because I know that the issue is not yet resolved, but at least I found a way to keep my video resolution even after the return of the mode 'sleep'.  I have tested my 'solution' for the week past and have found that it works... until now.  So without further ADO, here is what I did:

  (This process which requires you to write your settings of resolution in a two steps)

  First of all, you need to open the 'NVIDIA control panel '.  This can be done by right-clicking on a any part of the homepage and selecting "NVIDIA control panel", or will the taskbar (next to the clock) and right click on the NVIDIA icon.  Once you are in the Control Panel, select "Change resolution" under the heading "display".  When everything is working properly, you will see your "recommended" setting, as well as all the other parameters available.  Then click on the 'Customize' button which will open a pop-up window.  In this window, click on the button 'Create Custom Resolution'.  This will bring up a context menu that allows to display all of your current settings (for example Horizontal pixels, vertical lines etc.).  There are 17 variables, you will need to register.  Once you have entered these parameters, you can put your computer in mode 'sleep' to activate the resolution problem.  For me, I had to wait some time before the issue of the resolution would surface (an indication that the problem occurred before even to see the screen was a sound the computer would just before you wake.)  It's the sound that makes Windows when you connect a usb device and windows detects it).

  Now that your screen resolution has changed (a very undesirable occurrence), you must make your way to the NVIDIA Control Panel.  It is extremely difficult due to the large size of the windows and such (I had to hide my taskbar automatically in order to access all the necessary buttons).  You will need to then press the button 'Customize' and 'create a custom resolution' button once more.  Once there, you can enter your 'custom' variables, even if they are the real '' recommended '' for your resolution settings.  (Tip: under the "calendar" section, you may need to move from "automatic" to "manual" in order to access the lower set of variables.)  Once you have finished, click on the 'test' button, and your resolution should be back to normal.  I think he will ask you if you want to preserve settings, and if they are to your satisfaction, then click Yes.  Once you have done this, it will save your settings 'customized', so that when your computer becomes crazy and changing your resolution again, it will be pushed to change for your custom configuration.

  Some things to note, you can't create and save a custom setting when your computer is not working properly because it will just tell you that it is a double parameter.  Your can only create and save the custom setting when the computer has been removed and all parameters available in addition to 640 x 480.  That's why you go through all the trouble in resolution 640 x 480.  That's what I did to make my computer 'Act' normal after the mode 'sleep'.  It has worked for me so far, but I know that the problem is still there because all the other resolutions are missing (next to 640 x 480 and my "custom" of the 1920 x 1080 resolution).  Of course once you restart your computer, all your choices of resolution will be back.

  If this does not work for you, I'm sorry.  I'm not an it expert by any means.  I couldn't stand having to restart my computer whenever he entered mode 'sleep'.  I am very disappointed that hp has not addressed this issue or have found a real solution to it, but at least I can leave my computer goes into sleep mode now.  I tried to be as detailed as possible in my explainantion of measures to take, but feel free to ask if you have any questions.   I'll try to clarify if I can, but as I said, I'm no computer expert, and I could not be able to answer your actual technical questions.

  Good luck to you all.

• Why do you have Vista 32 bit my native resolution of 1680 x 1050, but 64-bit Vista is not?

  I was already running 32 bit Vista Home Basic and I've now changed to 64-bit Home Premium and for some reason that I have more my 1680 x 1050 Native resolution monitors in the list of available resolutions.

  The closest available resolutions are 1600 x 900 and 1600 x 1024.

  Obviously it's not a lot of good because anything other than of the native looks horrible!

  I have the option in the NVidia Control Panel to create custom resolutions, which do not seem to work in windows is.  I added 1680 x 1050 and set it as my resolution.  Now the problem I have is that the games aren't my resolution custom in their choice of resolutions in the graphics options, so I can't play in 1680 x 1050 the closest choice is the resolutions that I mentioned earlier, which means that the quality of the image in the games is horrible!

  I do not understand why I now have a problem when 32-bit Vista everything was fine, it's the same graphics driver as before only the 64-bit version.

  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  No problem.

  However, this problem is solved now fortunately.  I did some research on Google more and came across this article about Windows 7 users with simillar problems with drivers of the generic Non - PNP monitor and lack of resolutions:

  http://www.TomsHardware.com/Forum/652-63-window-monitor-1680x1050-1920x1080-resolution-here

  The advice it worked a treat, I downloaded PowerStrip (http://downloads.guru3d.com/PowerStrip-3.75-download-169.html#download ),

  I uninstalled all drivers GPU rebooted my computer, and then use Powerstrip I created my own .inf driver using the correct resolution of 1680 x 1050 Max, registered the and that installed my driver of monitors.

  Reinstalled my drivers, GPU, rebooted and it instantly recognized my Native 1680 x 1050 and set it to one at the start.  And when I run all the games, the resolution is in the list!

  I am so happy.

• Dell PowerEdge T110 II add on the video graphics card that works

  The system configuration:
  Dell PowerEdge T110 II
  BIOS 2.8.0
  RAM 2x8GB

  For many reasons (for example feeding bus PCI), it is difficult to install a Dell PowerEdge T110 II graphics card.  The ATI Radeon HD 5450 is a good choice for the Dell PowerEdge T110 II because if its (approximately 10W) low energy consumption.

  After trying several HD 5450 (listed below), a graphics card that works is a "VisionTek Radeon HD 5450 - graphics card - Radeon HD 5450 - 2 GB memory DDR3 - PCI Express 2.1 x 16'.

  Edit: Thanks to paikat for the following references, (see his assignment for the links, where to buy)...
  VisionTek manufacturer: 900356
  Reference Dell: A6173020

  This card works when the monitor is connected to the VGA/D-SUB/DB15 connector. I wasn't looking to connect to HDMI or DVI connectors.

  After you install this graphics card, passed the BIOS Setup:
  Integrated Devices > integrated video controller: enabled

  by saying:
  Integrated Devices > integrated video controller: Standard

  and allowed to move from "Standard" to "Distributed" so it now says:
  Integrated Devices > integrated video controller: distributed

  Note: Install the card with the monitor connected to the integrated video port / edge, change the BIOS to Distributed settings, restart the computer and then connect the monitor to the Discrete / distributed / video port to Add on.

  Here are the identifiers on the "VisionTek Radeon HD 5450 - graphics card - Radeon HD 5450 - 2 GB memory DDR3 - PCI Express 2.1 x 16'

  54502GBPC
  VT 5450 PCIe 2GB V/D/H
  VT-400746PC
  PCB #R81KLD-PJ3Z
  R71KLD
  R81KLD
  Version: 1.0
  G0850000-0351L002739CZA-0087
  SH6 94V-0
  E248779

  Here are some pictures of the 5450 VT from DELL:

  

  

  Other video cards that have been tested and work well in T110 II are:

  * XFX Radeon HD 5450 1 GB GDDR3 VGA/DVI/HDMI Low Profile PCI-Express graphics AMD card HD545XZQH2; HD-545 X-ZQH2
  Note there is another version of this card is ONXFX1PLS2 who has not tested.

  * EX-PX610GT-video JATON GeForce GT 610 2 GB 128 - Bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x 16 HDCP ready low profile ready card video

  * Reference DELL SOUND H545H1G Radeon HD 5450 (Cedar) 1 GB memory DDR3 64 bit PCI Express 2.1 x 16

  I hope this can help others avoid the frustration when you try to install a video card in a Dell PowerEdge T110 II.

  SR2002

  I have read this thread and seen the suggestion of VisionTek, it also works with the card mother E3-1230V2?

  My guess is the Dell PowerEdge T110 II uses the same motherboard for various configurations of CPU, but this is only a guess.

  SR2002

  Also, are there better options eventually with the support of 12 DDR5 and directx?

  None that I know, but I've only tried a few cards. Please let us know if you find cards better than the VisionTek 900356

  SR2002

  I saw a thread suggesting ASUS GTX650-E-2GD5, someone at - he of the inputs on this card?

  I tried a GeForce GT 610 2 GB and it did not work.  Check the use of the GTX650-E-2GD5 (DPT) power and make sure that it is less than 25 watts (see below)

  Quick notes:

  1. the location of PCIe x 16 is actually a "full-size x 8 slot" (also known as an x 16 slot / x 8) and the video card needs to work in this type of accommodation.

  2. video card power (TDP) is a limiting factor. Technical guide Dell says "the system supports a maximum power of 25 W for all four cards PCIe.»  and said Dell owner's manual "ATTENTION: to ensure correct cooling, not more than two cards of four extension may have more than 15 W power consumption (maximum 25 W each), not to mention the integrated storage controller card."

  3 install the card with the monitor connected to the integrated video port / edge, change the built-in BIOS devices > on-board video controller 'Activated' / 'Standard' to 'Distributed', restart the computer and then connect the monitor to the Discrete / distributed / video port to Add on.

• Dell Optiplex 780 compatible graphics cards?

  Hi all I'm new on the dell forum. I love my Dell Optiplex 780 SFF and last year I bought a

  "Sapphire AMD HD6570 2 GB DDR3 Lite Retail PCI-E graphics card" which worked but was too big for the case.

  Now, I am looking for the best compatible graphics card, I saw in another post that the Sapphire HD 7750 Low Profile fits, but is there something better than that, that fits and is not low profile?

  CoreSci

  Hi all I'm new on the dell forum. I love my Dell Optiplex 780 SFF and last year I bought a

  "Sapphire AMD HD6570 2 GB DDR3 Lite Retail PCI-E graphics card" which worked but was too big for the case.

  Now, I am looking for the best compatible graphics card, I saw in another post that the Sapphire HD 7750 Low Profile fits, but is there something better than that, that fits and is not low profile?

  First, ask yourself "is there something better than that, which corresponds to and is not low profile?  No, because there ONLY cards that will fit must be small footprint!

  Second, 7750 HD cards are often recommended as a good choice for the Dells - unique slot and low power requirements.  I am running a 7750 HD in my own 780 MT, having chosen as the best choice for fit and performance.  That said, your power supply of the SFF is only 235W, which is very marginal.  I've seen reports of others by means of this type of card in a 780 SFF, but you should make sure, that it is not overtax the power, depending on what you have in your computer.

• Impossible to get good resolution on external monitor for laptop

  I am struggling with this situation of resolution of external monitor for the past two weeks. Since the research I did, it is a very common question; However, I did find a solution. I tried all the solutions have not been successful. I hope someone here can help you.

  Asus K50IJ laptop

  Win 7 Home Premium 64 - Bit SP1

  Intel Core2Duo T6600

  4 GB OF RAM

  Mobile Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family

  Monitor is Samsung SC750_S24C750P connected with VGA cable (laptop doesn't have a HDMI output)

  I reinstalled the drivers for the graphics card; current driver is 8.15.10.2302 of 11/02/2011

  I reinstalled the drivers for the monitor; current driver is 1.0.0.0 11 13, 2012

  Monitor is currently appearing as "HDMI" in the Device Manager; I have chosen "Analogue" and had the same results. Now & then I see "Generic PnP monitor" in the Device Manager. whenever I see it I uninstall it.

  Bottom line is this: settings keep bouncing everywhere. On rare occasions, I saw the picture I want on the external monitor; When I close the lid on my computer (that's why I bought the external monitor - so I can get a bigger picture, not two), the resolution is 1024 x 768. When I disconnect the external monitor, I get the correct image and ratio 16:9 (1366 x 768) on my laptop screen. When I connect the external monitor I have two choices for the resolution: 800 x 600 or 1024 x 768.

  I went to the Intel graphics properties tool and set a resolution to 1920 x 1080 at 60 Hz - 32 bit - proposed by Samsung for their monitor. Result 7 choices of resolution, no '' recommended '' and the higher tag 1366 x 768. I can live with 1280 x 720; When I choose this resolution or anything higher, the laptop screen is superb, but the image on the external monitor covers 1/4 of the screen - the rest is black. Reset the external monitor doesn't change anything.  Computer restarting does not help. Monitor disconnect/reconnect does not help. I tried this routine dozens of times.

  I really need to use the external monitor, and I need the image proportional. Is there a way to do this?

  Separated from: http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_7-hardware/cant-get-right-resolution-on-external-monitor-for/f3680ff9-684c-428E-a6ac-74fe4171a845

  Hi, thanks for the response.

  I saw this on the Intel Web site so I tried mode extended without change.

  If I had 1366 x 768 on both screens, I would have been delighted - instead, I had two choices on my external monitor: 4:3, covering the entire screen with a distorted image, or 16:9 which covers about 40% of the screen.

  The most likely explanation I can think of is that the external monitor 4:3, I used in the past has left a kind of preference file in my computer which could not be changed, so he kept coming back to 4:3 instead of 16:9. I thought the problem might be the VGA - VGA cable, but this does not explain why I was unable to cover the entire screen on my external monitor with something other than a distorted picture.

  Using the past because I was forced to buy a new laptop. As soon as I plugged on the external monitor, everything was perfect.

  Thanks again for your help.

• Fractal resolution setting

  Hello

  Is there a way to 'Force' PP to use a lower resolution of fractal during playback? My system is not terrible but PP work properly. Sometimes, during playback of HD images it gets really laggy and I must pause and restart to clear.

  Under my choice of resolutions fractal I gives me the opportunity to go down to 1/4 resolution 1/8th and 1/16th are ghosts on... is there anyway in the settings or preferences to manually tell PP to allow 1/8 and 1/16 in option?

  PP CS6.0.3

  Win Vista

  8GB

  Don't remember the processor, but it is "ehh."

  PP has obviously read my system specifications and considers that it is sufficient not to offer anything less than 1/4 res... I don't know lol.

  Thank you

  Shane

  Not all resolutions are available for all types of sequence. For sequences of definition Standard, such as DV, only full and 1/2 are available. Many sequences HD up to 1080 image size, Full, 1/2 and 1/4 are available. Several fractional resolutions are available for sequences with the superior to 1080, like RED, frame sizes.

• How to enable IPv6 actually how activat IPv6?

  I have a laptop under WINDOWS8 and a home with a password Group

  I have a PC running Windows 7 Ultimate CHARLES, but I can not: JOIN the pc-portable working group

  CREATE a new group to work on this PC

  "Because: my connection IPv6cannot"has no d"network access"!

  My Intel(r) 82566DC-2 Gigabit Network Connection, after "Resolutions of problems" is OK and the driver is the last!

  I tested all: disabled, reactive...

  After the seizure, the ° N password compared to my laptop workgroup on my PC of Charles under Windows7 "homegroup encounters an error.

  WHY I actually can I ACTIVATE my IPv6 (Internet Protocol version 6)? Thank you

  I have also since one day a TP-LINK reliable choice on my DELL PC (Windows7) PCI adapter 300MBPS WIRELESS N PCI Adapter but the pb is the same! Model # TL-WN851ND is operational for the rest!

  Meet distinguish please my preference in Frensch

  [Moved from comments]

  Windows 7-French

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-networking?TM=1364048853555&tab=all

  Select your language with this icon: English 

  Don

• Unable to create the internet site at 1024 x 768 on Tecra A9

  It's my problem. I always worked on a laptop Toshiba Satellite with a screen square (75 "wide). The resolution is set to 1024 x 768 (the maximum). + On this format, I founded applications page layout for my wordpress blog. font size and photo sizes. +

  Now, I have a new laptop on the side, Toshiba Tecra A9, it has a screen of 82.5 "and the resolution is Vista-set to a maximum of 1680 x 1050.
  Quality large screen, except for one thing: the reproduction of the pages of my blog (and in fact all the pages of the website) is ridiculous!
  The pages fill is more than 80% of the space of the screen of the monitor, but only 50%. This dwarfs bar that was once my blog page is literally floating in empty space otherwise.

  OK, I understand that one set standard must meet the new monitors somehow. But it happens in all the wrong ways. Compared to my 'old' image of the screen, the police of my texts swells now screaming size, while at the same time, have the images published + shrunk. +, this means a substantial loss of detail.

  I discovered that I can 'restore' it using the utility of Zoom and enlarge the view to 150%, the blogpage will cover most of the screen space, and images are wonderfully great. But the text already blown up expands as is good-no longer shouting at viewers, but Thunder...

  This cannot be the way it works. First of all: no surfer will take the trouble to play the magnify option.
  Now I have been able to reduce + sizes of the police in the HTML of my blog section for a normal effect. But this means that on my old screen (and I guess on that of all the others who are still working with a 3/4 "outdated" screen), texts will appear too small and unreadable.

  I checked my setup screen Tecra over and over again, can find no fault there.
  I've experimented with different choices of resolution, it is clear that the Tecra screen is designed for maximum results. .

  So what is happening, and how can I fix without losing on one of two different detection systems?

  > Now, I have a new laptop on the side, Toshiba Tecra A9, it has a screen of 82.5 "and the resolution is Vista-game to a maximum of 1680 x 1050. Quality large screen, except for one thing: the reproduction of the pages of my blog.

  Sorry, but buddy I put t understand why post you this here in Toshiba forum?
  The point is that you question has nothing to do with the laptop but only with your Web site design problem.

  Many notebooks (not only the portable Toshiba) are equipped with the 15.4 wide screen XGA and there are a lot of people (me too) who, Web design on portable computers with these screens.

  The fact is that, if your screen resolution is not set to 1024 x 768, then you must use the tools of additional web design (for example; Extension for Firefox: web developer tool bar) or you can use the special functions on s graphics program intensify or reduce the images or the entire site to your favorite resolution.

  I would recommend a few professional sites on Web design / webdevelopment for details.

  Good bye

• You will have to plug a pavilion and a MS213 to a Sony HD TV.

  We are having to connect our Sony HDTV with our Pavilion in a single MS213.  There is no video output on our flag.  Please help and thank you.

  You are right, there is no video output on this all-in-one PC. You might be able to use a USB video adapter, but you do not want to verify that it would be able to provide the right type of video for your TV and the proper resolution. The PC has a 18.5 "screen, as well as its resolution is 1366 x 768, which may or may not be a factor in the choice of resolution through an adapter.

  See you soon,.

• HP w2338h: view not fill screen after Windows 10 Upgrade

  Upgrade to Windows 10 the display on the monitor has an unoccupied part is one inch around the entire screen. The resolution is correctly set up to 1920 x 1080. It is impossible to extend it through the display settings in the PC. The upgrade was made from Windows 7. I checked through HP and there is no 10 available for this monitor Windows driver even if Microsoft called all the software and compatible hardware for the upgrade. The adapter is version 8.970.100.9001, dated 13/01/15 date.

  I don't know if the graphic card, ATI Radeon HD 4350 connected via HDMI, has no effect on this problem.

  I'd appreciate any help.

  To answer my own question: I plugged in just another monitor with the same resolution (Dell U2312HM), and it didn't overscan problem. All pixels are 1:1 (clear and sharp). So it doesn't seem to be a monitor + graphics driver interaction.