Cisco 79xx Auto composition! = Boring!

Similar Questions

• Cisco VCS and composition to an IP address

  I have a question about the composition of address Ip and VCS. In the Administrator's guide, he says that VCS determines that an IP address that will be called if it is:

  -is the IP of a locally registered endpoint

  -Beach one of the subzone of address membership rules is the responsibility of intellectual property

  The second point is that of interest. As part of the way in which it is presented, I take this means that if a subarea membership rule has a range of IP addresses that includes the address of a non-registered endpoint then VCS will still attempt to place the call to the endpoint not registered regardless of the setting "Calls for unknown IP addresses" (under the numbering plan). For example,.

  Assume the end point has (EP - A) is enrolled in a VCS control that is configured to use the mode indirectly for "calls to unknown IP addresses. The idea here is that there is a highway of VCS. Suppose that there is an end point (EP - B) on the internal network that EP - A wants to call. EP - B is behind the firewall, but it does is not registered in the VCS - C. Finally, suppose the SCV - C has a subarea (let's call it "Internal-Unregistered") with a membership of 10.10.10.0/24 rule.

  Now, if the address IP of EP - B is 10.10.10.10 and EP - A dials by IP, will be the call successfully established? Based on the Administrator's guide, the VCS will see the EP - B IP as "known." The Administrator's guide does, really, that the call would be placed. I'm stuck sorta messaging RAS, since EP - B would not be exchanging messages with the VCS - C RAS.

  I also wonder about calls from unregistered endpoint. EP - B could call EP - A directly. I don't want to support this behavior in the design (I recommend rather using the numbering of the URI. I am considering set up the Alias of relief on the VCS - C to channel calls from unknown devices to an attendant on the MCU. Regardless, what I was asking is the following:

  If I have a membership rule subarea as above and EP - B sends a message of call setup to the VCS - C, the VCS - C would still see the call as coming from the default Zone of the local area? The reason I wonder is because of the way the Administrator's guide defines "known IP addresses.

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  Bill

  Hi Bill,

  to answer your question about the first scenario (where EP at dials the address IP of the EP B), VCS would attempt to place the call if there is a rule of type search 'AnyIPAddress' for the local area on the VCS - C (and assuming that the previously mentioned subzone containing 10.10.10.0/24 exists). VCS would be in this case send a message of CONFIGURATION H225 EP B.

  For the second scenario, where EP B contains the IP of the EP, EP B would send that an INSTALLATION H225 EP EP a. message would then for the message INSTALLATION with an INSTALLATION containing a reason 'routeCallToGatekeeper", instructing EP B to dial the address IP of VCS instead, since the VCS want to be included in the call, signaling path.

  To answer your last question, with regard to the area in which a call of an endpoint not registered (when the IP address of endpoint belongs to a subnet-type subfield) comes on, the answer is that the appeal turns on the default Zone. Calls will be local area if the call comes from a real end point recorded.

  I hope this helps.

  -Andreas

• Cisco TCS auto reboot on power failure

  Hi all

  We have a new site with Cisco telepresence content server. There as some electrical work happens and sometimes there is power failure. After each power failure, you must manually activate TCS. Is it possible, we can make it automatic. So once the resumption of feeding, TCS will be on automatically as vcs.

  Details of device-

  Cisco TelePresence Content Server v5.3 build 3316

  Concerning

  Bodineau

  The option in the BIOS, we enabled on our 2nd Gen TCS when it was installed.  Don't you remember the option, but it's there.

• VCS Cisco control / Core Expressway interoperability

  Hello

  I have the fate of unmanageable endpoints on the internal network, functioning as a H323 IP address directly.
  In fact, we had regular meetings as the auto numbering unmanageable endpoint by H323 IP address directly.
  Unmanageable end points would not be registered in the VCS / CUCM.

  1. can I adjust the composition of Cisco driver auto & GST to endpoints VC not saved by its IP address (regular meeting VC > Auto call the IP address internal VC endpoints directly)?

  2. or should I deploy VCS / Expressway to consume the traversal lic. / RMS lic. from autodial URI translate be IP call? Can I just deploy the VCS - C / E motorway in order to reduce the lic. costs?

  You don't need a VCS-E for this.

  Just go to the plan of numbering - Setup and call to unknown IP addresses as Direct. The alternative would be to create a subzone with a membership rule with the IP of your endpoint. Depends on if you want to only allow the call to this particular or to any endpoint IP on your network endpoint.

• Confused on what I should do to the extent of the VLAN PVID vs

  I have a complicated image it's crazy to watch, but I hope I can explain it enough:

  I have currently a Powerconnect 2716 connected two Poweredge 2950's particular race as long as ESXi Hypervisors, and their data warehouses are on a MD3000i iSCSI SAN (the main use of the switch is the iSCSI san, servers have connections of backup for the client/guest network access).

  

  Hypervisors vmnic config was hokey at best because we did not have the second gigabit switch to have enough ports to run everything and have redundancy, so I ended up using a lot of 10/100 ports on my Catalyst 3750 PoE switch for guest computers and my iSCSI on the 2716 traffic.

  I now have the second 2716 and crosses the configs on the old switch, I realized that I had taken my comments machine network inside out vlan1 and iSCSI ports using the pvid.

  Here's my dilemma, I want the network traffic between the two switches for multiple VLANs, but not others.

  My proposed solution is

  

  (4) VLANS 1, 10, 130, 139.

  (3) GAL: 1 (2-4 ports), 2 (7, 8 ports) 3 (ports 14.14)

  belonging to a VLAN will be:

  

  

  

  -VLAN1 is for managing the switch, I will have my switches addressed as 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 and I want trunk VLAN1 LAG1 through so I can handle both switches and either: plug to switch to port 1 with a laptop or use a remote VM guest with shared resources in on LAG2 VLAN

  -VLAN10 is for my vMotion, just a 10.x.x.x and me planned to redirect it on the LAG even as my machine comments traffic

  -VLAN130 is my iSCSI SAN

  -VLAN139 is my Machine/vSphere Client/visitor access

  What I fear is VLAN139 traffic with the filtering of capture off the coast and out without label on 16 port which could cross the trunk of LAG 1 (ports 2,3,4) (via VLAN1) and which causes a loop since the 2716 does not support STP.

  

  I want to master the iSCSI, management switch and vMotion across two switches Dell but I want computers invited to climb their respective uplinks of switches. I can't have curls if not all my client/server traffic will cross through a Dell for the other Dell to find the uplink of work when the cisco STP auto disable one of the ports

  Can I do this, even if by default, all ports are in VLAN1 unidentified? Or I'll have to this redesign and PVID allows to separate the ports 10-16 and put my VLAN10 on LAG2 as well as iSCSI traffic?

  Can VLAN 10 exist on PVID 2 while the trunk between the 2716 is in 1 PVID and always pass traffic between switches?

  Have I fried the brain of everyone with my images and my knowledge "just enough to be dangerous?

  Thanks in advance! :)

  PVID 1 is the default, but if you change it on an interface, page 52 ftp://ftp.dell.com/Manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_powerconnect/powerconnect-2708_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.pdf , then it will use the PVID you set to no marked traffic. So if you put LAG3 PVID 139, untagged traffic goes to 139 and tagged will go to VLAN 10. If Cisco is down not signposted in 139 with a PVID of 139, then everything should work correctly with your configuration and do what you want it to do.

• The AIP - SSM to unused ASA connection interface

  Hi people,

  Perhaps, someone has already raised this issue, but I was unable to find anything relevant. We have an ASA with an unused interface (gig0/3). The sensor of the AIP - SSM is physically connected to this interface with the following IP settings:

  Sensor (192.168.2.2/30,192.168.2.1)---interface ASA (192.168.2.1/30)

  It's basically point to point connectivity, and I can reach the ASA of the sensor and the other way around.

  This design is dictated by the lack of a free port on the switch.

  Technically, it should work without any problems, but I can't seem to be able to reach the sensor. There is a switch between my PC and the sensor and the switch has the corresponding static route added. I can reach the switch sensor.

  Is there a security feature hidden I don't know that prevent communication with the sensor.

  And ACL of the sensor allows the traffic to all networks (0.0.0.0/0)

  With the sensor acl set to 0.0.0.0/0, the sensor must be allowing connectivity.

  You can use the 'View of package' command on the sensor to look at packets on the interface command and control to see if the packets are what makes the sensor.

  You say that you have a static route on your switch for the switch reach your sensor. Do you know if your PC is configured to use the switch as the computer's default router. If the PC is to use a different default router, then the other router should also the static route.

  The other possibility is that the SAA itself can be deny traffic.

  Since this is an ASA connected to the MSS interface, the traffic must be routed through the ASA. Standard firewall rules apply to this traffic. The security level of the interfaces can prevent traffic, and an ACL may be necessary in order to allow the circulation of your PC be routed to the SSM.

  NOTE: If you don't want to have to worry about roads, the other alternative is to make the network between the ASA and SSM to be an isolated network that only 2 machines know.

  You can then use PAT static to map a port on the inside of the ASA interface with the address of the SSM 443 https port and map a second port of the SAA within the interfaces to the address of the SSM SSH port.

  How your home PC would simply plug the ASA IP using these specific ports and the ASA would do the translation of port and transmit on the MSS.

  The SSM address could also be dynamically PAT would have on the SAA within the address, so SSM could start the connection to other machines on the inside network.

  Another alternative if you have addresses available on your inside network IP is to use static NAT instead of PAT. And just go forward and has the ASA statically map an IP network on IP of the SSM on the network that only the ASA and the SSM inside could know.

  In both cases the network between the ASA and SSM would not routable at, and you wouldn't have to worry of reproducing static routes anywhere.

  SIDE NOTE: A separate network for the SSM you Becase you will also need to NAT or PAT address of the SSM for the ASA to outside interface. In this way the SSM will be able to connect to Internet to download cisco.com auto updates, and/or pull overall correlation of servers cisco information. It's probably the same configuration that you would already other internal addresses, and just to be sure, you cover the SSM since you have it on a separate subnet.

• Update IOS IPS AutoSignature

  I use cisco1941w.

  I would like to know how configure to the CLI and where is the URL.

  The bellows is correct?

  CLI

  Router (config) # ip ips-setting automatic update
  Router (config-IPS-Auto-Update) # occur - 0 0 23 1 - 31 1-5

  URL of Router(config-IPS-Auto-Update) # https://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/ida/locator/locator.pl

  Router (config-IPS-Auto-Update) # past username XXX XXX

  URL

  https://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/IDA/Locator/Locator.pl

  Hello

  a. currently IOS - IPS doesn't have the feature to have updates from automatic signing of cisco.com as IPS appliances and make modules.

  Therefore, there is no url on cisco.com auto-signatures updated for IOS - IPS.

  b. you can have your own HTTP/TFTP server where you can keep all the IPS signatures downloaded from cisco.com the IOS - IPS can grab files from this server. The configuration, you are referring to this part of the Setup where you specify the address identification information and the connection to HTTP/TFTP server.

  c. in addition, the same configuration can be made by CCP (IOS - IPS configuration is less bulky via CCP). Attach a screenshot.

  SID Chandrachud

  TAC security solutions

  Customer Support Engineer

• Module of IPS ASA 5505 Cisco ASA-SSC-AIP-5 Auto Update

  Automatic update no longer work after November 14, 2014

  Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 5,0000 E4, SSC-AIP-5

  Error: automatic update has selected a package ([https:[email protected] / * *///swc/esd/11/273556262/guest/IPS-sig-S838-req-E4.pkg) to the cisco.com Locator service, however, the package download failed: the host is not approved. Add TLS certificates approved of the host system.

  Automatic update can work without problem until November 14, 2014.

  I've added welcomes guests of tls trust

  # tls trust-facilitators
  72.163.4.161
  72.163.7.60

  Always faced with the same question

  Understand the Signature Update feature works automatic Cisco IPS

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/IPS-sensor-software-version-71/113674-IPS-automatic-signature-update-00.html

  SPI uses the file transfer

  protocol defined in the file download data learned in the server manifest URL (currently using HTTP

  TCP (80)).

  The problem I see is that earlier before 14 nov it fetch the file signature with HTTP (works fine)

  but now, he's trying with HTTPS instead.

  A single session against 72.163.4.161 (have always been the HTTPS)

  A single session against 72.163.7.60, previous HTTP now it uses the HTTPS protocol

  Does anyone have a solution?

  fix.

  the problem with the location service should be set right now and you can continue to use the auto-update http

• Cisco ucs with VMware 5 auto deploy

  Hello

  In our lab, I test with 5 VMware and Cisco UCS. We run UCSM 2.0 (1 m). I am now to test the auto hand deploy. I have auto configuration to deploy in VMware and it works (first of all, I had some problems with DHCP on windows which is solved in version 2.0 of UCSM (q)). vSphere gets deployed to the blade. When the blade (vShpere) wants to connect to vCenter I get an error of vCenter has enough licesing for this action. I loaded a lot of low-income VMware. When I create a virtual machine, it starts perfectly and apears in vCenter.

  I search on the internet for people who have the problem of the simailer, but could not find.

  Some body the same problem our help me?

  Thanks in advance,

  Robin

  Robin,

  This looks more like a VC related question (UCS) platform.  UCS has no effect on the functionality of licenses of the VC.

  If the host does not connect to the CR, how are you VMs to "start perfectly and appear in vCenter?

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Widget slideshow composition don't auto summary on mobile

  I have a widget of composition that works as a slideshow. Works absolutely well on desktop but the scaled-down mobile version didn't auto recovery once you touch a slide.

  I tried to change the recovery time, but it makes no difference. It is also immaterial see the target is assigned to the click or rollover.

  If anyone can offer any suggestions, this is the first time I met this problem!

  Thank you.

  He

  You can try to uncheck 'enable Swipe '.

• Problems with the Widgets Library / Compositions / presentation / Auto Play.

  I have a problem of failure when using the widget "Overview."

  The widget within the group is "Composition".

  With 'Auto Play' on...

  If I make a shortcut (button) to any element in the light table or use the options of 'Parts', 'Prev' or 'Next', continues to work option 'Auto Play '.

  I can only access other areas by direct click, it stops the 'Auto Play'.

  Can you help me solve this problem?

  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  Please take a look at this related post: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5551810#5551810

  See you soon

  Parikshit

• Composition B2B Expressway Cisco tests

  Hi guys

  I was wondering if you can recommend a way to test calls outgoing & incoming B2B by Cisco Expressway. I did my setup & DNS & them records validated. But I need to test the routing of calls is fine in both directions.

  Do someone here have a similar infrastructure to allow only those calls with him.

  Best regards

  Ahmed

  Hi, Ahmed.

  [email protected] / * / -for outgoing calls to test;

  https://cway.cisco.com/tools/SrvRecord - to test DNS records;

  To test inbound call, please publish videoadress of your endpoint.

  BR Oleksandr

• Cisco IPS 6.1 Auto Update password encryption

  I have recently set up the automatic update via Cisco. I entered my CCO username and password via the GUI. As I entered the password, the characters were displayed in the form of points. A little later, I was in the EPI CLI. I noticed in the "show config" my CCO username and password are in the clear. Is there a way to encrypt my password? I assume developers Cisco intended for me to use my ORC. Should I use a different id EAC? Maybe a generic company userid has only IPS signature update capabilities.

  Unaware, but they work.

  See http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsh61309

  I opened a case of TAC as if you installed a blocking device it stores also your credentials and the enable plaintext password if the configuration file is encrypted on disk.

• Cisco SX 20 past question call composition

  Hello team,

  Hello team,

  We use Cisco SX20 and configured the public Ip address,.

  We can receive the call for outside call but not in outgoing call, I tried several public IP address for the test, but none of them does not.

  There is no guardian, address Public Ip directly to the configuration system.

  Please suggest the same

  Thanks in advance

  Are Set - up mode set to 'Direct' call and you specify H.323 call Protocol?

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• Hi need some help on this router cisco 1921 complete, auto & half duplex

  We have this old 1841 router series and we change in 1921, I still put the same settings, but this two-sided thing is having problem (I think).

  We are supposedly to have 20mbps up & download speed using this 1841, and if we use 1921 20down / 10upload speed.

  When I put gi0/1 on full-duplex it will descend to the bottom. But if I set auto duplex, it register under the/s and half-duplex and the internet works but only 10 Mbps upload. See below

  igabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
  Material is CN Gigabit Ethernet, the address is 0000000
  Description: "connected to this."
  The Internet address is 000000
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/s, DLY 100 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 13/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Half-Duplex, 100 Mbps, media type is RJ45
  control output stream is not supported, control of input stream is not supported
  Type of the ARP: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00
  Last entry of 00:00:00, 00:00:00 exit, exit hang never
  Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0, 75, 14, 10242 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 79729
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 5400000 bps, packets/s 546
  5 minute output rate 719000 bps, 390 packets/s
  170608043 package, 1963069286 bytes, 79501 no input buffer
  Received 477 broadcasts (0 of IP multicasts)
  0 Runts, 0 giants, 4 controllers
  entry 0, 0 CRC errors, frame 0, saturation 0, 0 ignored
  Watchdog 0, multicast 0, break 0 comments
  160510262 packets output, 1965851816 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 4095435 collisions, 0 resets interface
  unknown protocol 0 drops
  0 babbles, collision end 0, 0 deferred
  carrier, 0 no carrier, lost 0 0 interrupt output
  output buffer, the output buffers 0 permuted 0 failures

  I really appreciate your comments and thank you

  It is very likely that the provider has configured its device for 100 Mbps, which was compatible with the interface of your FE 1841. If you configure the 1921 at a fixed speed of 100 Mbps and full-duplex, it should probably work.