Cisco ISE and question Admin CLI

Hello.

I have a strange problem with my installation of ISE. First of all, I use AD users for authentication. It works very well on HTTPS. I can connect with my admin AD by HTTPS.

The problem starts when I try to log in via the CLI (SSH). I got login prompt. When I type my credentials AD that he said "Login Incorrect" and I got the same result if I try it with the local administrator account.

I tried to reset the password for the local administrator over HTTPS to check this kind of wrong password. But no effect.

My ISE is installed VMware.

Experiences with it?

ARM

CLI authentication which is the base Linux OS is not / cannot be bound to AD to the admin authentication. Only, you integrate the application on top of Linux, which in this case is ISE, to AD. So, if you want to connect to the cli shell, you will need to use the username/password you configured during installation. If you do not remember those you need to perform a rest of password via the installation CD / ISO

Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

    I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

    When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

    Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

    And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

    This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

  • Cisco ISE and WLC Access-List Design/scalability

    Hello

    I have a scenario that wireless clients are authenticated by the ISE and different ACL is applied depending on the rules in the ISE. The problem I have seen is due to the limitation on the Cisco WLC that limit only 64 input access list. As the installer has only a few IVR/interfaces and several different access lists are applied to the same base on user groups interface; I was wondering if there may be an evolutionary design / approach according to which the access list entries can evolve next to create a vlan for each group of users and apply the access list on the interface of layer 3 instead? I illustrated the configuration below for reference:

    Group of users 1 - apply ACL 1 - on Vlan 1

    User 2 group - apply ACL 2 - on the Vlan 1

    3 user group - apply ACL 3 - on the Vlan 1

    The problem appears only for wireless users, he does not see on wired users as the ACLs can be applied successfully without restriction as to the switches.

    Any suggestion is appreciated.

    Thank you.

    In fact, you have limitations on the side of the switch as well. Long ACL can deplete resources AAGR of the switch. Take a look at this link:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-3750-series-switches/68461-high-CPU-utilization-cat3750.html

    The new WLCs based on IOS XE and not the old OS Wireless/Aironet will provide the best experience in these matters.

    Overall, I see three ways to overcome your current number:

    1. reduce the ACL by making them less specific

    2 use L3 interfaces on a switch L3 or FW and the ACL is applied to them

    3. use the SGT/SGA

    I hope this helps!

    Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

  • Cisco ISE and external syslog server

    Hi Security Experts,

    We start with deployment cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) in our network. We have allocated 250 GB of space for the node (Admin + monitor) ISE.

    I want to know if we can send tracking of nodes of external syslog server logs after a defined time interval.

    For example, newspapers that are more than 10 days are for external syslog server. So basically our node monitoring will have the marbles which are the Max 9 days. Is this possible? Could you tell me some doc that explains the configuration of the same thing?

    Thank you

    Boudou

    No this is not possible via syslog. What you need is database purge, so that the monitoring database is purged after a determined time interval. Here's a guide that will help shed some light on this:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/user_guide/ise_mnt.html#wp1054328

    Tarik Admani
    * Please note the useful messages *.

  • Cisco ISE and the fast user switching

    Greetings,

    In our deployment, we are interested in using the "fast user switching" which lies in the functionality of Windows.   After searching for a while, I see that the native Windows supplicant is not compatible with the fast user switching.   It does not appear that Anyconnect is either.   Can you please inform me as to what suppluicant, I need research to enable the functionality of Switchign user?

    We currently use ISE 1.2 Patch 4.

    Thank you for any assistance.

    David

    Cisco EHT NAC Agent does not support Windows fast user change when you use the native supplicant. This is because there is not clearly the older user disconnecting. When a new user is sent, the Agent is hung on the ID process and the old user session and therefore a new posture cannot take place. According to Microsoft Security policy, it is recommended to disable the fast user switching.

    Source:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.2/user_guide/ise_pos_pol.html

  • Cisco ISE and the new Version of AntiVirus... not DAT

    I am ready to go to our VPN ISE users. It was a great test and it seems that we are ready to roll.

    Then comes a new version of our corporate AntiVirus software. We had Kaspersky EndPoint Security v8 since last August. Kaspersky now comes to Endpoint Security v10. It took about 3 months for compliance in ISE Module to allow the NAC Agent to recognize KESv10. But now, when we connect I get an error from the NAC stating bascially that the version of installed KES is no posture installation rules and he can't do anything. (see attachment for the exact wording)

    I remember when we first set up the ISE, there was a screen that broke down the different manufacturers of AV and the different versions that would support ISE/NAC. I have no idea where it is now.

    How to I update my sanitation/policies/rules to take account of two KES10 including, or simply change to allow version 8 +, or even ANY version?

    I'm sure this is a simple solution, but I can't find it. I looked through a lot of documentation, and I even looked through a PDF of global laboratory on-site ISE posturing, and he can find.

    Thank you

    Dirk

    Unfortunately, there are various known bugs related to the use of the browser "bad" that have been around for a while

  • Cisco ISE 1.3 question Active Directory

    Hi people

    I'm having a problem with our Cisco ISE and would love some comments or a solution. I configured to ISE to use our Active Directory setup and so far it seems to be functional. I could connect to retrieve ad groups and use AD for authentication. The problem I encounter is that when I try to go to the ' Administration > Identity Management > Sources external page and select our instance AD in the window side left hand screen hangs and won't load.  Any advice?

    You are using a supported browser and have you tried an alternative one?

    If you are using a supported browser, it looks like a bug in the layout of the page. I was opening, in this case, a case of TAC. I had this same work of page very well for me in the three different 1.3 deployments.

  • Cisco ISE posture assessment and client provisioning

    Hello

    I have the Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I configured the RADIUS between these devices.

    Also, I configured RADIUSbetween ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to posture assessment for these devices (ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA or ISE Cisco Cisco IOS). Please give me the steps together for assesment for cisco ios device posture in Cisco ise.

    In addition, please give me related to posture assessment and the provisioning client logs.

    Thanks in advance.

    You can go through the list link below to download a PDF link

    Assessment of the posture with ISE.

    http://www.Cisco.com/Web/CZ/expo2012/PDF/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.PDF

    ~ BR
    Jatin kone

    * Does the rate of useful messages *.

  • Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

    Hello

    We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

    We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

    and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

    We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

    (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

    (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

    (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

    But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

    (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

    That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

    Thank you

    Pranav

    What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

    What follows is located under

    POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

    REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

    What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

    These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

    Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

    Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

    Thank you

    Dirk

  • Cisco ise license command

    I have a question

    1. is it possible to install the Cisco ISE software on the server machine to physical HP (without solution VMware or without the use of SNS-3415-k9 cisco device)?

    2. for 2500 users online, I'll order L-ISE-BSE-2550, L-ISE-PLS-S-2500 and L-ISE-APX-S-2500 of basis, more and apex licenses. My question is HA (primary and secondary) application I need 2 licenses for each? (2 * L - ISE - BSE - 2550, 2 * L - ISE - PLS - S - 2500 and 2 * L - ISE - APX - S - 2500)

    or just a license for each is enough?

    3. If I implement Cisco ISE and HA on VMware environment, can I 2 L-ISE-VM-K9 licenses for each VM machines? and also I need 2 licenses for each basic, plus, and at the apex?

    4. What is smart net Cisco and Cisco SASU? need to buy these for support and ticketing system?

    5. What is license for cisco anyconnect (L-AC-APX-1 year-G)?

    thnx in adv.

    You can install ISE on a HP ONLY Server if you are using software virtualization (VMware or KVM).

    The Guide of Installation of ISE sets out three options:

    1 hardware appliance from cisco SNS

    2. virtual machine VMware

    3 Linux KVM.

    The AnyConnect license is required to qualify with the features of the Apex. It is not installed on the ISE server, however.

  • Session of endpoint on Cisco ISE 2.1

    Hello

    I installed 2.1 ISE with patch 1.

    I have a question about the session on Cisco ISE calendar.

    If a n receives an Access_Accept message for an endpoint, ISE installs a session that is visible on the Live session section.

    If endpoint disconnects from the network, which is the time-out for this session?

    Is it possible to set this timer?

    I try to put an end to the session with the CoA on Live Session Action, but this action fails because my switch does not support cost.

    So I reboot Cisco ISE and after its reloading, the session is deleted.

    In a case that it is not possible to use the feature of 'end', is it possible to delete the session in some other way?

    Thanks in advance

    Antonio

    Hi Antonio,.

    • Completed sessions are cleaned up 15 minutes after the end.
    • If there are authentication, but no accounting, these sessions are deleted after an hour.
    • All idle sessions are cleaned after seven days.

    But your n should send account opening and stop the message for the best operation.

    For the manual uninstall, you can use under method as shown in the link I pasted. You can consult the section "withdrawal embusked sessions.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-4/api_ref_guide/API _...

    Also, you might be interested in the discussion below:

    https://communities.Cisco.com/thread/61587?start=0&TSTART=0

    Kind regards

    Kanwal

    Note: Please check if they are useful.

  • Authentication (Windows Server 2013) AD Cisco ISE problem

    Background:

    Has deployed two Cisco ISE 1.1.3. ISE will be used to authenticate users wireless access admin WLC and switches. Database backend is Microsoft running on Windows Server 2012 AD. Existing Cisco ACS 4.2 still running and authenticate users. There are two Cisco WLCs version 7.2.111.3.

    Wireless users authenticates to AD, through works of GBA 4.2. Access admin WLC and switches to the announcement through ISE works. Authentication with PEAP-MSCHAPv2 access and admin PAP/ASCII wireless.

    Problem:

    Wireless users cannot authenticate to the announcement through ISE. This is the error message '11051 RADIUS packet contains invalid state attribute' & '24444 Active Directory failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE'.

    Conducted a detailed test of the AD of the ISE. The test was a success and the result seems fine except for the below:

    xxdc01.XX.com (10.21.3.1)

    Ping: 0 Mins Ago

    Status: down

    xxdc02.XX.com (10.21.3.2)

    Ping: 0 Mins Ago

    Status: down

    xxdc01.XX.com

    Last success: Thu Jan 1 10:00 1970

    March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

    Success: 0

    Chess: 11006

    xxdc02.XX.com

    Last success: Fri Mar 11 09:43:31 2013

    March 11 failure: read 11:18:04 2013

    Success: 25

    Chess: 11006

    Domain controller: xxdc02.xx.com:389

    Domain controller type: unknown functional level DC: 5

    Domain name: xx.COM

    IsGlobalCatalogReady: TRUE

    DomainFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

    ForestFunctionality: 2 = (DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003)

    Action taken:

    Log Cisco ISE and WLC by using the credentials of the AD. This excludes the connection AD, clock and AAA shared secret as the problem.

    (2) wireless authentication tested using EAP-FAST, but same problem occurs.

    (3) detailed error message shows below. This excludes any authentication and authorization policies. Even before hitting the authentication policy, the AD search fails.

    12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

    11808 extracted EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated

    Evaluate the politics of identity

    15006 set default mapping rule

    15013 selected identity Store - AD1

    24430 Authenticating user in Active Directory

    24444 active Directory operation failed because of an error that is not specified in the ISE

    (4) enabled the registration of debugging AD and had a look at the logging. Nothing significant, and no clue about the problem.

    (5) wireless tested on different mobile phones with the same error and laptos

    (6) delete and add new customer/features of AAA Cisco ISE and WLC

    (7) ISE services restarted

    (8) join domain on Cisco ISE

    (9) notes of verified version of ISE 1.1.3 and WLC 7.2.111.3 for any open caveats. Find anything related to this problem.

    10) there are two ISE and two deployed WLC. Tested a different combination of ISE1 to WLC1, ISE1 to WLC2, etc. This excludes a hardware problem of WLC.

    Other possibilities/action:

    1) test it on another version WLC. Will have to wait for approval of the failure to upgrade the WLC software.

    (2) incompatibility between Cisco ISE and AD running on Microsoft Windows Server 2012

    Did he experienced something similar to have ideas on why what is happening?

    Thank you.

    Update:

    (1) built an another Cisco ISE 1.1.3 sever in another data center that uses the same domain but other domain controller. Thai domain controller running Windows Server 2008. This work and successful authentication.

    (2) my colleague tested in a lab environment Cisco ISE 1.1.2 with Windows Server 2012. He has had the same problem as described.

    This leads me to think that there is a compatibility issue of Cisco ISE with Windows Server 2012.



    Yes, it seems that 1.1.3 doesn't support Server 2012 as of yet.

    External identity Source OS/Version

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 R2 32-bit and 64-bit

    Active Directory Microsoft Windows 2008 32-bit and 64-bit

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2008 R2 64-bit only

    Microsoft Windows Active Directory 2003 32-bit only

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.PDF

  • Cisco ISE CLI and GUI password expires

    I got Cisco ISE version 1.1 I am facing a problem with the password CLI and GUI, it expires and I can not connect, I do password reset using the DVD of the ISE.

    I naviguer navigate to the CLI of ISE, then perform the following commands:

    conf t

    password policy

    no password-expiration-enable

    and reset the password of admin GUI, using the command:

    # reset-passwd ise admin request

    from the interface of ISE I delete option for the devil admin account after 45 days.

    but after 60 days, the password expire again.

    kindly advise what to check for this question expires.

    Hello Mostafa,

    Yes, the last answer was more towards past-mgmt GUI because in the majority of cases, it happens with the administrator account on the user interface. I need to know if you've restarted the ISE after disabling the expiration of the CLI, because what I read a few weeks in an internal fault which password policy settings are not preserved on cli after restart so just to check could please check current on CLI w settings / help to see the race. in the password policy.

    ~ BR
    Jatin kone

    * Does the rate of useful messages *.

  • Access VPN ASA and cisco ISE Admin

    Hello

    Currently I'm deployment anyconnect VPN Solution for my client on ASA 9.2 (3). We use the ISE 1.3 to authenticate remote users.

    In the policy stipulates the conditions, I put the condition as below.

    Policy name: Anyconnect

    Condition: DEVICE: Device Type Device Type #All Device Types #Dial - in access EQUALS AND
    RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type is equal to virtual

    I'm authenticating users against the AD.

    I am also restrict users based on group membership in authorization policies by using the OU attributes.

    This works as expected for remote users.

    We also use the ISE to authenticate administrators to connect to the firewall. Now what happens is, Cisco ASA valid also against policy, administrators and their default name Anyconnect.

    Now the question is, how to set up different political requirement for access network admin and users the same Firewall VPN.

    Any suggestions on this would be a great help.

    See you soon,.

    Sri

    You can get some ideas from this article of mine:

    http://ltlnetworker.WordPress.com/2014/08/31/using-Cisco-ISE-as-a-generic-RADIUS-server/

  • Renewal of certificates Cisco ISE Admin and EAP

    Hi on board,

    Maybe I'm asking a rather stupid question here, but anyway :)

    Currently, I think about how renew a certificate admin/EAP on a node of the ISE and the effect on the endpoint authentication.

    Here's the thing that I do when I install initially an ISE node

    1.) creation of CSR on ISE (PAN) - CN = $FQDN$ and SAN = 'name of FQDN as well. "

    2.) sign CSR and certificate of bind on the ISE node - done

    Now, after 10 months or two (if the certificate is valid for one year) I want to renew the certificate of admin/EAP ISE.

    Creation of CSR: I can't use the $FQDN$ like CN, because there is still the current certificate (CN must be unique in the store, right?)

    So what to do now? I really need to create a temporary SSC and make the admin/EAP certificate, remove the current certificate, and then create a new CSR? There must be a way better and more important to do nondisruptive.

    How you guys do this in your deployments?

    Thanks again in advance, and sorry if this is a silly question.

    Johannes

    You can install a new certificate on the ISE until he's active, Cisco recommends to install the new certificate before the expiry of the old certificate. This period of overlap between the former certificate expiration date and the new certificate start date gives you time to renew certificates and to plan their installation with little or no downtime. Once the new certificate enters its valid date range, select the EAP or HTTPS protocol. Remember, if you turn on HTTPS, there will be a restart of the service

    Renewal of certificate on Cisco Identity Services Engine Configuration Guide

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-Services-engine/116977-TechNote-ISE-CERT-00.html

Maybe you are looking for