CPU i7-6700

Similar Questions

• X 51 R3 - i7 - 6700 is possible to OC the CPU higher to 3.4 without cooling system water?

  I have the X 51 R3 with a CPU i7-6700, but not water cooled version.

  After loading in the bios, I don't see any option to overclock the CPU in the OC section or any other menus besides.

  Is this possible with the systems cooled by water not? If so, how can I do this?

  Hello!  Unless your CPU is a variant of K, you cannot overclock because it is locked by Intel.

• Strange question on CC apps on Windows 10

  Hi people,

  I tried to search to find an answer to this, but no luck so far.   Hoping that someone can help because it drives me crazy!

  I've recently upgraded to creative cloud and have this installed on two systems (as permitted!)   I have it on my work system which is a Mac - here, it works great! - and also on my PC at home.

  My PC actually wasn't last week, but I have exactly the same symptoms on the new PC.   Here's roughly what is happening:

  • Apps to load correctly without a problem.
  • On opening a file (any file, I tried many), things start to go wrong
  • I'm unable to use keyboard shortcuts - as now the space key to activate the tool «hand».
  • I'm unable to move the panels (for example, the Panel layers) around the screen - they seem "frozen" if I can use them to change the settings, but not reposition.
  • I don't click and drag "handles" to resize the documents / elements in documents. It is the main killer, I can live with other bugs.   For example, to change an element placed in InDesign, I need to use the tools on the top bar, rather that click and drag to resize.

  This happens as well with existing documents and new files too.   It seems to affect Illustrator, Photoshop and Indesign - I don't really use any other applications other than Premiere Pro and Media Encoder, which work fine.

  As mentioned above, this caused a problem on my old PC and my new system too!   So, obviously, there is an underlying problem of compatibility somewhere.   Here is some info on my new PC:

  • Windows Pro 10
  • CPU i7-6700, 16 GB RAM, GeForce GTX 950 graphics (configuration dual monitor)
  • It's a whole new system, there is no shared component (other than the external hard drive that stores my work)

  I tried to disable the GPU acceleration in applications, but it makes no difference.   Given that I have encountered these problems on two separate systems, I'm guessing that there must be a software that can be the cause?   No idea where to start on this diagnosis?   I wonder if there is a problem with the NVIDIA GeForce software (that has been installed on the PC last too).   I don't want to start randomly software uninstall but if she will not solve the problem.

  Thanks for reading, I hope someone can help.

  See you soon,.

  Andy

  OK - the problem has been located. The fault doesn't lie with Nvidia (Nvidia sorry!) The problem actually came from synergy - it's software to share the mouse/keyboard to a computer between multiple computers. Interestingly, however, it does appear that a problem with the dedicated Nvidia graphics cards (in other words, it does not cause a problem on the Intel integrated chipsets, or on the Mobile of Nvidia chips no more!)

  Problems were reported at the synergy.

• Optimal catalog size / Performance issues

  Hello

  I was wondering, is what size a good catalog - if inverse geo-location and facial recognition is enabled.

  Problem: So far, I've had a single catalog for about 30,000 photos. I recently reinstalled my PC and thought, that it would be beneficial (after various OS upgrades and Versions of Lightroom) to make all things new. However, despite the powerful Hardware, it seems that Lightroom is facing serious problems with the number of photos in this catalogue and says little. Now, I wonder if break the number of photos in smaller catalogues would help.

  Hardware specifications:

  CPU: I7 - 6700 k

  RAM: 64 GB

  GPU: GTX 1080, 8 GB

  Lightroom is installed on a SAMSUNG SSD Pro 850 / 1 TB

  The pictures are on an other Samsung SSD, EVO 850 / 1 TB

  Software:

  Windows Pro 10

  6.6 Lightroom

  Do you have any advice? Or can Lightroom generally manage the number of photos easily and more exist somewhere a mistake?

  Thanks to advandce

  Michael

  @trashner @dj_paige: thank you both.

  6.6 Lightroom formed - what I would call 'the perfect storm '. 6.5.1 also first, problems of performance handling of faces in the largest catalogues (I'll explain later). With 6.6 and known issues of performance and memory, by head screeen personas to a wiered Lightroom application behavior difficult to answer and sometimes. Why not everyone knows this? I suppose that, because most of the users to install LIghtroom 6.6 as an update to an already existing and fully indexed catalog.

  Then, my experiences with 6.5.1 were as follows: generally more rapid then 6.6. But, when I went to the screen personas, the application started late, but, fortunately, to a degree where it was still a little sensitive. So while 60% of the faces (30,000 pictures, which took more then 15 hours) have been recognized for the complete catalog, I had the opportunity to 'play' nearby. And I discovered a few interesting things: once again, the application when booting with the root directory of the catalog is still slow and accept suggestions of name is not funny at all. But I have the files/catalaog organized in folders and subfolders (year and month can, for the most part) and began to experiment with subfolders as starting point. And all the sudden Lightroom has started to become much more quickly in many ways. Face recognition from one subfolder to another (on avareage 300 Photos) began to speed up a lot and also work with name suggestions, etc. became easy. When I went a hierachy upward (meaning a year), with sometimes 6,000 or as little a few hundred speed, was a kind of uproportional goes downwards or upwards depending on the number of photos in this directory. While the indexing/recognition was still not fully filled 6000 pictures mean, hard to work with it and 500 is very easy.

  Then, I started to activate up to 1000 subfolders and waiting always face rocognition was completed. That took a few minutes. I repeaded that for each subdirectory and been fact within 2 hours for the remaining 40%. In this way the recognition of work face 3-4 times faster, then having lightroom do the recognition for the entire catalog at a time.

  Then I started to work on the suggestions of name etc. also based on subdirectory to subdirectory, which was still much faster, and then the applicaton behaved when the entire catalog has been selected.

  Conclusio

  -With the help of 6.5.1 instead of 6.6, was an important stepp.

  -However, the answer to the question of the optimum size of catalog would be:

  (a) catalog can be very very large

  (b) but to speed up the recognition of faces and to work with her, breaking the process into pieces of 500 photos.

  See you soon

• Slow with many layers of Photoshop

  Hello!
  
  

  I do experience notable in Photoshop slowdowns when working with large files (more than 4000 x 4000 pixels) with many layers.
  I tried different things, like tinkering with performance options in Photoshop, brush settings and global PC settings.
  Nothing seems to help.
  
  When you start with a new file (say 4000 x 4000 pixels), everything seems fine. As I work, I create layers more. When the number of layer approaches 80 ~ 100 I start noticing significant slowdowns. The Brush tool becomes lag (delay adds boring), zooming and paning is smoother and everything becomes overall slower.
  
  When checking in the Manager of tasks, either the graphics card or RAM or processor is fully utilized. Total CPU usage is usually only 20 ~ 25%, 50% of RAM but Photoshop is lagging as hell.

  I think I have a quite decent PC. (at least for this type of workload..)
  My PC current specifications are:
  
  CPU: i7 6700 k @ 4, 0GHz
  RAM: DDR4, 16GB, 3000 Mhz
  GPU: GTX 980 Ti
  2xSSD RAID-0 for the main system partition (Photoshop "scratch disks" can also be programmed to do this).
  Windows 10

  
  So, what could be the problem? Any ideas I could try?
  Or should I rethink my working habits of several layers?

  Update!
  After more inexperienced, seems to have finally found the culprit that is causing slowdowns.
  Layer blending Options. Especially those that generate their own semi-transparent area.

  I can reproduce this in the layer file 10:
  (1) create a new file with the dimensions of the 6000 x 6000 pixels (or something bigger) with no background
  (2) draw something
  (3) add option 'outer glow' merger with significant RADIUS
  (4) add a few more layers, repeat steps 2 and 3
  (5) create new layer below all other layers and try to get something in the area where overlap the effects of "outer glow".

  So the main takeaway:
  Be careful adding mixture of options to layers and rasterization them where possible.

• wanted: new HP desktops with the Intel (Skylake) CPU 6700 series

  For those who have purchased a HP desktop with Intel (Skylake) CPU 6700 series in, you should read this web info on a defect confirmed in CPU micro code which can cause blockages or problems when doing some heavy calculations:

  http://www.PCWorld.com/article/3021023/hardware/how-to-test-your-PC-for-the-Skylake-bug.html

  A fix has not yet been determined by Intel and my cat with the HP support was not successful to determine what HP knows about this problem and what they will do to ensure that those of us who have bought desktop witht this CPU will have the problem fixed.  According to web article, it could be something as simple as an update of the BIOS or as drastic as a reminder of the CPU and the replacement by Intel.

  I hope someone from HP will know more about it and reply to this post so that we are not left out in the cold.

  Hello:

  It is a peer to peer forum.

  HP maintains no official presence here.

  I suggest using this link and ask HP to keep you in the loop.

  Who knows, they may not even be aware of the issue.

  https://SSL.WWW8.HP.com/us/en/contact-HP/connect-with-HP.html

  I know that they are good enough to go back to people in this way.

• HP Pavilion Dv6000 (6700): upgrade CPU

  I know im probably one of the las guys still using a computer laptop model HP Dv6000, but this computer got well served and she even has upgraded to windows 10 pro for free, applause to microsoft.

  But here's my question, I would like to upgrade the processor and for the time being the

  Intel core 2 duo t5450 (1.66 Ghz)

  and I wanted to know if the ppga socket 478 runs and supports a

  Intel core 2 duo t7800 (2.60 Ghz) OR intel core 2 duo t9500 (2.60 Ghz)

  Thank you for your time and soon saw answer!

  Hi @leovinic,

• Have a Nokia 6700 (Firefox is my browser) can I use Firefox on it.

  In addition above my network is O2 I'd be able to add firefox to the section of yahoo email Bt it or from the section of the Web site.

  If it is the Nokia 6700 slide and then not, because it uses Symbian OS 9.3 and has also a slow ARMv6 600 Mhz CPU type and only 128 MB of Ram anyway even if there not Android instead.

  https://wiki.Mozilla.org/mobile/platforms

  Symbian
     We currently have no plans to develop a full Firefox browser for the Symbian platform. See Mobile/Symbian for notes from an inactive project to port Firefox to Symbian. However, a future version of Firefox Home may be available for Symbian.
  

• Pavilion p6-2330 PC: CPU Upgrade

  I upgraded a few years back the dual core 5400 A6 for an A8 5500 Quad core and added the ram to 12gig. I looked at the list of the Jasmine CPU and it goes back only to the 5700 (Trinity) of the A10. A Quad Core AMD A10 6700 (Richland) will work in my PC Pavilion p6-2330?

  Found an A10 - 5800 Newegg. Going to try it...

• X 51 - R1, Intel i7-6700 3.40 GHz, compatible?

  I have an Alienware X 51 - R1. I want to know if I can pass my CPU to an Intel i3-3220 3.30 GHz to the Intel i7-6700 3.40 GHz?

  Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

  The i7-6700 will not work on the X 51 - R1. The best CPU validated for this model is =

  JJ8D9 Ivy Bridge i7-3770, Quad Core, 3.40 GHz, 8 MB, 77 w, E1

• Included spec cpu cooler

  The cooler is included the stock cooler LGA 1151, it looks great, or if not, how thick the cooler is included in inches? I want to mount this cooler inside:

  Intel.com 6400 i5 & i7 6700 States the thermal Solution included is E97379, so that you can run through google & find your size, he compares it to yours. I see that this cooler can have the manufacturer E97379-001 & is used on several platforms / power outlets; My guess is that you have a core i5 / i7 fan-sink; any improved radiator should be taken compatible 1151, & take into account if the new part simply attaches, or if she needs the motherboard removed to accommodate a new back plate. I did not have a Council Skylake so can not say what will happen a Member here who bought a non - K with basic fan-sink was able to install a chiller in simply bolting it on without messing around with the rear backplate; you would 1 attempt on the bolt, & if it's a no-go, Council to remove / install new back plate / reinstall pension + new cooler and then see what happens when psu caddy closes. I have the feeling that all / most 1151 sinks heat will be a simple drop-in. don't forget to apply the thermal grease on CPU 1, so new part does not have thereon (Arctic Silver / Gelid / CIM / Grizzly etc.), I hope this helps

• Update CPU and or motherboard

  Hi, I am looking for help! I expect download new BF1 game when it came out, but after checking my online system, it turns out that my CPU does not meet the minimum requirements I have a

  Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz

  It says the minimum just a Core i5 6600 k

  where can I find the brand and model of the motherboard to see if I can switch the CPU to or if I need to update the motherboard which one to get that would fit

  It's an Alienware Aurora R1 2009 if you need more information made me know what to do and where I find

  Thank you!!

  Your Gen1 Intel i7 9xx CPU is a socket 1366 X 58 chipset Nehalem (Bloomfield); motherboard is micro-ATX / u - ATX form factor (9.6x9.6") made for Aware by model MSI (MIcro Star int.) MS - 7591. It probably can be upgraded to an i7 975 x 4 strands or 980 / maybe 990 x 6 hearts as the first choice

  Intel 6th, Gen is a chipset socket 1151 Z170 Skylake, list of the i5s here (& sky i7s prior link)

  

  Here we see an Asus Maximus Gene VIII Z170 6700 k inside the Aurora R4 i7

  This picture was passed to me by a member of the forum, which has an admirable skills in building computers, & the effort required to remove old & replace with new & do so properly & without prejudice for components is important or can feel important, based on your skill level.

  Front wiring not necessary no change (plug & play) but the MIO Board turned out not to be able to run versions of software CmndCntr & therefore version 2.8.11 was replaced, on Windows7 & works.

  Because of their catch of CPU, motherboard on R1 plateau (attaches the metal plate, the motherboard to & who live in the wall case) is different from that of the plateau of R4; If you remove your motherboard to graduate, you will find a black, liquid cooling back plate plastic bolted on the set; its four candlesticks bolts (in the model of bolt single socket 1366) are "" bumps, which may or may not affect the installation of a new plate, say for socket 1151 (your old black plastic plate is removed from the status bar, the new attached to the back of the motherboard itself and, if all goes well, the motherboard bolt on his plate without problem). You can run the Aurora R1 motherboard Exchange / upgrade as through bing search term / google where it may be possible to find out about a dozen or less trade / newspapers, construction certainly search for "Mother Aurora" here in this forum, you can post on Alien Arena, sift in the subforum AlienOwners Aurora & send a friend request to Spook who has experience with swaps R2 & R4 & may have advice, since I have no time to devote to your thread after posting this little help, so good luck

  • My Modded Aurora R3
  • Prevent having the function correctly on Rampage IV Gene R4
  • Asus Haswell Z87 success

• Overclock 6700 k in aurora r5

  Hello!

  Can someone tell if it is safe to overclock CPU 6700 k in Aurora r5 with liquid cooling unit that is shipped by Dell? If so, is it all win in speed of the system and game performance? I know that Dell them factory overclocks to 4.2 GHz, but it could be overclocked up to 4.6 GHz. No experience or advice to share?

  Thanks for your reply and have a good day everyone!

  Area 51 - R2 OC (overclocking) in the command center & Bios

  Command center =
  Thermal control
  AlienFX
  AlienFusion
  AlienAdrenaline
  Controls of OC

  Aurora-R5 OC based on Bios - Advanced - performance Overclocking (enabled/disabled) Options
  Automatically, the system monitors and adjusts the settings overclock for more optimal levels without user interaction. The user can also choose set the automatic level values (Max, balanced) control or switch to a traditional manual mode where all parameters can be set individually.

  Command center =
  Thermal control
  AlienFX
  AlienFusion
  AlienAdrenaline

• How to check technology Turbo Boost on X 51 R3 i6700 CPU 4.0 GHz with Turbo Boost technology

  Hi guys,.

  I'm new to the forum and I hope to find and answer quickly.

  I bought a X 51 R3 i6700 CPU 4.0 GHz with system about two months of the Turbo Boost technology. The invoice indicates i6700 CPU 4.0 GHz with Turbo Boost technology. The information system indicates 3.4 GHz, no mention of the Turbo Boost technology. The BIOS also indicates 3.4 GHz and no mention of the Turbo Boost technology.

  I've scoured the internet for where this Turbo Boost technology can be reported in the system but found nothing. Anyone with a X 51 R3 system knows where this Turbo Boost technology can be declared the system?

  I read that some people want to turn off. Crikey! How am I guess even turn on or off when I don't even know if I have it.

  Thanks to all those who are trying to help me. A screenshot would also be nice.

  MrOtto

  Turbo Boost 2.0 technology is integrated into all processors of Intel i7-6700.

  In the first link, there are many listed and incorporated technology this processor. Just because they are not mentioned in the BIOS, this does not mean they do not exist or are not active.

• Good Intel CPU installed?

  I recently took delivery of the new desktop XPS 8900. I ordered Intel Core i6700 processor (8 M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz). However when I checked the information on the system installed on the desktop CPU shows Intel Core i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40 GHz.  Performance test indicated qualified Max speed 3.40 GHz and current flow 3.41 GHz. correct processor has been installed? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you

  http://Ark.Intel.com/products/88196/Intel-Core-I7-6700-processor-8M-cache-up-to-4_00-GHz

  Yes, that's the correct processor. the 6700 has speed of 3.4 Ghz and Turbo to 4.0.

  You can install HWiNFO64 and you see all the details of the processor, the speed of each carrot and temp of each nucleus during the performance test.