ERROR: TclTasksC:process_077: in the FPGA Compilation

Hi all

I use for my application in which I am facing following error when compiling my fpga code compact rio 9072:

Compilation failed due to an error of Xilinx.

Details:
ERROR: TclTasksCrocess_077: did not finish. Please, look in the newspaper and report files.false
When running
"process run"card.
(file "C:\NIFPGA\jobs\XI64xG6_My449tj\map.tcl" line 6)

ERRORack:2310 - type compositions "SLICEL" too found to adapt to this device.
ERRORack:18 - the design is too large for the device and package.
Please see the Design summary section to see the cost estimates for
your design exceeds the resources available in the device.
NOTE: A file NCD will be always generated to allow you to examine the mapped
Design.  This file is intended for assessment use only and will not be processed
successfully through NOMINAL.
This NCD mapped file can be used to assess how the logic of the design has been
mapped in FPGA logic resources.  It can also be used to analyze
preliminary to the level logic (route pre) calendar with one of the static electricity of Xilinx
analysis of synchronization (PRHT or Timing Analyzer) tools.
Summary of the design:
Error number: 2
Number of warnings: 69
Use of logic:
Number of slice Flip Flops: 7 886 on 15 360 51%
Number of 4-input lut: 16 104 on 15 360 104% (OVERMAPPED)
Distribution of logic:
Number of slots occupied: 8 744 7 680 113% (OVERMAPPED)
Number of slices only related logical container: 8 744 100% 8 744
Number of slices that contains no logical relationship: 0 to 8 744 0%
* See NOTES below for an explanation of the effects of unrelated logic.
Total number of 4 input lut: 17 400 on 15 360 113% (OVERMAPPED)
Number used as logic: 15 998
Number used as a middle way: 1 296
Number used as Rams 16 x 1: 82
Used number recorded the shift: 24
The logical Distribution report slice is not significant if the design is
too mapped to a resource not slices or if Placement fails.
Number of IOBs servile: 183 on 333 54%
BIO flip flops: 74
Number of RAMB16s: 1 24 4%
Number of MULT18X18s: 2 on 24 8%
Number of BUFGMUXs: 4 to 8 50%
Number of DCMs: 1 on 4 25%
Fanout of the Non-horloge nets on average: 3.38
Peak Memory use: 361 MB
Total in time REAL in the completion of the card: 1 dry 12 mins
Time CPU until the end of the total map: 1 dry 12 mins
NOTES:
Related logic is defined as logical that share connectivity - for example two
Lut are "related" if they share common inputs.  During Assembly of the slices.
Card gives priority to combine the logic that is related.  Generates so
best performance of synchronization.
Without logical report does share no connectivity.  Card will start only packing
logic not related in a slice once that 99% of the slices are held through
logical packaging partners.
Note that once the logical distribution reaches the level of 99% by related
logical packaging, this does not mean the device is completely used.
No logical report package will begin, continuing until all usable LUTs
and FFs are busy.  According to your timing budget, an increase in the concentrations of
logical packaging unrelated can adversely affect the performance of timing set
your design.
Mapping performed.
See the report of map file "toplevel_gen_map.mrp" for more details.
Problem encountered during the packaging phase.
Failure of the process 'Map '.

Start time: 18:29:23
End time: 18:44:42
Total time: 00:15:19

Can someone tell me why this error came?

Thank you best regards &,.

Vipin Ahuja

Vipin Hello,

It seems that your code requires more resources that are available on the FPGA. Optimizing your code can help to solve your problem:

You may have noticed some "Overmapping", mentioned in the newspaper:

Number of 4-input lut: 16 104 on 15 360 104% (OVERMAPPED)
Distribution of logic:
Number of slots occupied: 8 744 7 680 113% (OVERMAPPED)

Take a look at this article:

http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/060BA89FE3A0119E48256E850048FFFE?OpenDocument

And this:

http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/WebSearch/311C18E2D635FA338625714700664816?OpenDocument

Kind regards

Navjodh

National Instruments

Tags: NI Hardware

Similar Questions

  • Error-63101 when executing the FPGA Interface C API Generator in LabVIEW 2012

    I'm using LabWindows CVI 2012 and 2012 LabVIEW FPGA module.  I try to use the FPGA Interface C API generator and I get the following error from a freshly generated .lvbitx bitfile.  I use the local server compiles on my PC.

    Error-63101

    NOR-RIO: A valid .lvbitx bitfile is required. If you are using a valid .lvbitx bitfile, the bitfile maybe isn't compatible with the software you use. Determine which version of LabVIEW was used to make the bitfile, upgrade your software to this version or later, and then try again.

    The problem occurs when executing CVI or LabVIEW.  I was able to do this earlier when I was compiling the FPGA in LabVIEW with the API generator 2011 downloaded from the Web site.

    A bit of weirdness in my setup, it's that I charged it off downloads from the website (latest files after 2012 NIWeek) rather than the normal distribution DVD.  I installed LabVIEW, so NI RIO, then the Xilinx tools compatible with 2012.  It works very well when you talk to the FPGA to a LabVIEW vi running on my Windows PC to the host.

    Any suggestions?

    Problem solved.  I had to download FPGA Interface C API generator 12.0.  It works now.

    I would have thought that if a product was called on the menu in LabVIEW 2012, it would be prompted to upgrade to a compatible version, when I installed LabVIEW.  The old version is not compatible with version 3.0 bitfiles, as identified on the following lines at the top of the .lvbitx file:



     3.0

  • Why is the FPGA Compiler server so slow?

    FPGA Cloud compiler is faster because NO servers are performing, right?
    Well, my Windows 7 PC is powerful, but no luck there!

    Total CPU utilization is never more than 25% and the total memory (including other applications) usage is less than 16%.
    Why, the compile Server uses all available resources? has been restricted?
    How can I leverage more power from my PC?

    If servers OR compile faster code, there must be a plausible explanation / reason?
    Please indicate, how to make the compile server running faster in place?

    I don't know what machines compilation cloud service works, but I do not.

    It seems that the compilation is much faster on a Linux machine on a Windows machine (I think I've heard up to 30% faster). The Linux FPGA compile server is available for LV2012. Set up a Linux machine with a clock high enough CPU and RAM speed and you will get on the fastest possible compilation with current tools.

  • Internal error OR-farm - impossible to compile the FPGA VI

    Hello!

    When I try to compile any FPGA VI with LabVIEW2013 or 2012 SP1, I get the following error:

    "Year error occurred trying to connect to this server compilation."

    Details:

    Internal error OR the farm: Client Server received unexpected or bad data. »

    Intermediate files are not generated, the error message appears immediately after I have select build of build specification or I click the run arrow.

    I use the local server for compilation.

    The equipment I use: CompactRIO Evaluation Board - SbRIO9636, DELL laptop, Intel core2 Duo T5800, 2 GHz, 3 GB RAM, Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, SP1.

    The intermediate files CAN be generated without any problems if I select in the menu. If I run the FPGA application compile worker, a ToolTip message specifying that "FPGA compile runs", but after a few seconds, another message appears: newspaper several attempts were unsuccessful - please see attached images.

    At first, I thought that my firewall (Comodo 6.3) is the reason for this, so I disabled it but nothing changed. Then I tried to fix LabVIEW FPGA and XILINX tools with the firewall disabled but din do not solve the problem. I tried with LabVIEW SP1 of 2012 and 2013.

    If you have any suggestions, please let me know! Thank you!

    We would like that you try to reset the NIAuth database by following these steps:

    1. go to Windows Services (Bring up Windows with Ctrl + Alt + Delete Task Manager, click the Services tab, click the Services button at the bottom right of the window.

    2 stop the NI Application Web Server and NI System Web Server services in this order (right click, stopping service and select).

    2 backup, and then delete all the files under %PROGRAMDATA%\National Instruments\NIAuth: registry.bin and commitmark.

    3. run NI System Web Server and NI Application Web Server services in this order.

    4. navigate to http://localhost:3580 / connection of an IE on the local computer and try to log in with username "admin" and password empty. Succeeds, the server will return one signed in as: message from the admin.

    After you follow these steps, try and connect to the FPGA compiler, and then let me know what are the results.

  • Question of FPGA compile farm 2012

    I was under the impression that my FPGA LV code can be compiled by several workers when I bought and installed the FPGA compile farm Toolkit.  What I have, however, is that each work of compilation can only be compiled by a worker.  I expect that a single compilation work can be divided by the number of workers.

    So I see that a worker of computers will compile two computers of worker work.  It's just that a worker will be compiled at the same time.

    I just misunderstand the features to compile farm Toolkit or is it an installation problem?

    Thank you

    No, a unique compilation cannot be shared between workers. Nature of the beast-FPGA "compilation" is not something that lends itself to parallelism. You have the advantage that the build tools run much faster under linux, however.

  • Broken the FPGA VI but the empty error list

    Hello!

    I'm trying to run a vi which includes a 'Open FPGA VI Référence' function. However, an error and it says that "not compiled FPGA VI. When I try to compile the FPGA VI a message saying "The VI is broken". I try to run the FPGA and when appears in the error list, there is no error or warning in the list, although the name on the fpga includes the Red 'X' ('show warnings' is checked). Any help?

    I'm using Labview 2013.

    Pablo

    Hi Pablo.

    Sorry for my delay in responding, you managed to get the respected FPGA.vi yet?

    To answer your questions, if the project is ok with an empty FPGA.vi, then in theory, your hardware is configured ok. However, due to the vi being blank, you haven't tried to use one of the modules on your system, so it can introduce errors. The most common mistake is differentiation of mode Scan Mode/FPGA by installing the project in the first place. Also be aware that not all FPGA targets supports everything, for example some dislike for the rows that have an index to calculate the number of iterations, rather than a constant wired at the entrance to "n".

    Out of curiosity, why you place every measure in the DMA separately and also specify address? Is there a reason you don't just place all the measures in a table and put everything in the DMA, then divide the table on the other side?

    Generally speaking I don't think that incorrect programming should never cause LabVIEW crashing and you should always report the problem to the OR in order to take a look and see if they can fix it.

    Hope that you managed to get your problem sorted and again sorry for the late reply.

    Darren.

  • Why get error during execution the FPGA VI?

    Hello world

    I have a lot of sense of wrong during execution of a program that has been correctly executed previously. I don't know what I did wrong.

    Now, whenever I run this FPGA VI, I get an error (in the attachment). And, then runs the FPGA VI, but it does not give the data required those he supposed to give as output.

    Any help or recommendations would be appreciated also.

    Thank you.

    Hi auree123,

    There are a few reasons for this error
    may occur.  Could you tell us more about what's going on?

    You are
    I get this error when you compile and if so, at what stage?

    It looks like
    as you may be running it in Interactive Mode, which means that you are viewing
    the front of the FPGA VI on the development computer that you are running - is
    that correct?  If so, you could try to create a VI on your host
    Open a FPGA reference and communicate with the FPGA programmatically rather than interactively.

    Thank you

    Morgan S

    Technical sales engineer

  • tables of fixed size in FPGA compilation error - how to implement a waveform control in an FPGA?

    Hello

    After being stuck for two days, please let me briefly describe my project and the problem:

    I want to use the cRIO FPGA for iterative control of waveforms. I want to capture a full period of the waveform, subtracting a reference waveform period and apply control algorithms on this. Subsequently the new period of correction must be sent again for the output module OR. If it does not work, the captured waveform will look like the one reference after several iterations.

    I am planing to create an array of size fixed for the capture and the reference waveform (each around 2,000 items for a given period). I use so 2 paintings of each elements of 2000. I use the function 'replace the subset of table' to update each element captured in the loop sampling and a feedback for each table node to keep in memory (I also tried shift registers, but then the berries do not have a fixed size any more and I can't start the compilation process).

    If I try to compile the FPGA vi, I get the following error:

    Details:
    ERRORortability:3 - Xilinx this application runs out of memory or met a memory conflict.  Use of current memory is 4167696 KB.  You can try to increase physical or virtual memory of your system.  If you are using a Win32 system, you can increase your application from 2 GB to 3 GB memory using the 3 G switch in your boot.ini file. For more information, please visit Xilinx answer Record #14932. For technical support on this issue, you can open a WebCase with this project attached to http://www.xilinx.com/support.
    "Synthesize - XST" process failed

    Before I added berries to my code I could compile the FPGA without problems. So, it seems that the tables are too big for the FPGA. :-(

    Therefore, I would like to ask if there is perhaps a better method to implement my problem in LabVIEW FPGA? How could avoid the tables to save my waveforms on a period?

    Thanks a lot for your help in advance.

    Best regards

    Andreas

    Unfortunately, the LabVIEW FPGA compiler cannot deduct stores shipped from berries (yet). When you create these two large paintings, you are creating essentially several registers very, very large. Just by looking at your picture, I guess that there are at least 4 copies of each of the tables.

    You want to use LabVIEW FPGA memories instead. You can create memories outside the loop and then read/write them where you are currently referencing the berries. The only change that you really need to do is to break down your treatment in scalar operations. I have attached a simplified version of your plan, I hope it helps. Let us know if you have any other questions.

  • Failure of compilation of the FPGA target

    Hi all

    I met a problem when I tried to compile my target FPGA VI. Failed to compile for some reason any to halfway after start of the compilation. I post a few screen shots of the labview error information.

    What causes this problem? How could I solve this problem?

    Thank you very much!

    Kind regards

    masterwho

    Also you have large networks on the Panel before the FPGA VI?

    Or is there the great paintings inside the code?

    If you can, put a piece of your code.

  • stuck FPGA compilation, no errors

    Hello

    I wrote a LabVIEW FPGA 8.6.1 program (I have written several, this is my most recent). When I run it on the development computer it seems to work fine without any errors. When I try to compile, however, it still stalls on this part:

    'Analysis of generic entity library ( Architecture).

    This isn't feeze (the compiler is always updated time and you can see it working). It just doesn't progress no further than this point. By chance, does anyone know what could cause this? I know that maybe it's a little vague, sorry. Thank you!

    Nevermind, I figured it. I had a knot of analog input within a For loop. This wire entry (i.e. given out the analog input node) was connected to a tunnel auto-index on the loop For I have just disabled automatic indexing on this tunnel and everything seems to compile fine now.

  • FPGA compilation error

    I'm converting a piece of code from 8.5 to 2011.  When I tried to compile the fpga vi to a bit file, I get the error attached.  Why is this?  Thank you!

    The thing is that the only solution that I found about this error is to install a patch or repair/reinstall Xilinx or LabVIEW FPGA tools.

    Christian

  • FPGA compilation error sbRIO 9632

    Hi guys,.

    I'm trying to write a simple piece of code to send a PWM signal to a PIN on my sbRIO-9632 (starter kit 2.0) to order a servo. I used the example of 'control a servo using PWM' and my code is pretty much the same. When I try to generate/compile the FPGA VI, it stops after only 4 to 6 minutes, saying an error has occurred. The compilation appears to hang during the process of the "card".

    The example is for a sbRIO-9631 so I created a new project for my robot Robotics and changed the PIN e/s that I use (Port5/DIO9). I search through forums but cannot find a solution to this :/

    I have attached my code and the XilinxLog file with it.

    Thanks for any help!

    MortZ

    Hello

    Sorry for the late reply! Have you made progress?

    Unfortunately, your zip file seems to be disabled on my PC. How it has been compressed?

    So what I meant by remove the digital Pulse.vi to generate, is to see if it affected the compilation. Please see if you can compile the FPGA code with the following approach:

    Create the new project > add your target sbRIO > add the VI attached to this post to your FPGA target > compile

    I think it would be beneficial to you to see if the problem is the compilation itself or the code you are trying to compile.

    In addition, you have any another available PC? Might be a good idea to see if your code compiles on another PC.

    Please make sure you have LabVIEW Real-time and LabVIEW FPGA installed (it should come with the Robotics module, but I recommend that you check that they have indeed been included).

    If the build process fails to map no matter what you do, I propose the following: make sure that the target passes a self-test of MAX. reinstall the Xilinx tools (only if it seems that the issue is not with the code, but with the compilation process itself).

    Good luck

    Best regards

    Christopher

  • DMA FIFO of FPGA compilation error

    Hello

    I have a cRIO 9074 with FPGA. I tried a simple piece of code to learn how to acquire the data that is generated on the FPGA at a rate of 10 KHz and transfer it to the host VI to treat later in offline mode. However, I meet this compilation error when you compile the FPGA VI base containing a node to write FIFO (photo of the VI attached below). In compiling the report, it is said that there are 256 RAM Block used (the total number is 40), so an error has occurred. The error notification of exact compilation from Xilinx report is reproduced below:

    # From the PAM program

    # o toplevel_gen_map.ncd - intstyle xflow-calendar toplevel_gen.ngd map

    toplevel_gen. FCP

    #----------------------------------------------#

    "Target part using" 3s2000fg456-4 ".

    Design of mapping in the lut...

    Guided running of packaging...

    Running based on the delay of packaging of LUT...

    ERRORack:2310 - type compositions "RAMB16" too found to adapt to this device.

    ERROR: card: 115 - the design is too large to fit the device.  Please consult the Design summary section to see what resource requirements for your design exceeds the resources available in the device. Note that the number of slices don't notice it that their packaging could not be completed accurately.

    NOTE: A file NCD will be always generated to allow you to examine the mapped design.  This file is intended for evaluation use only and will not be processed successfully by means of BY.

    Mapping performed.

    See the report of map file "toplevel_gen_map.mrp" for more details.

    Problem encountered during the packaging phase.

    Summary of design

    --------------

    Error number: 2

    Number of warnings: 125

    ERROR: Xflow - card program returned the error 2 code. Aborting the workflow execution...

    Bitstream not created

    Time history analysis

    What does that mean? How can I fix this error?

    Thank you

    Bogdan

    Hey,.

    Have you already tried to reduce the size of the FIFO memory?

    Christian

  • Impossible to compile the FPGA in project

    Hello

    I get the following error when I am trying to compile an FPGA VI on a Compact Rio 9022, I missing something on my stand in?

    Everyone has seen this before and know what is happening?

    An internal software error occurred. Please contact National Instruments technical support on ni.com/support with the following information:

    7 error error component the generator module VI: NULL

    Possible reasons:

    LabVIEW: File not found. The file may have been moved or deleted, or the path to the file would be incorrectly formatted for the operating system. For example, use- as Windows path separators: on Mac OS, and Linux. Check that the path is correct using the command prompt or file Explorer.
    =========================
    NOR-488: The non-existent GPIB interface.

     

    This looks really familiar.  I know I've seen this error.  I think there is a problem if you upgrade to the latest NOR-RIO, but you don't put at level LV FPGA 8.6.0 to 8.6.1, or something like that.  Would it be, kmoyna?

  • FPGA Compilation fails because of the mistake of Xilinx

    My FPGA compiles and I cannot understand why. There is nothing crazy in my FPGA VI of really, it seems strange to have this type of problem. I can't reach the code because its owner, but it's pretty simple because it reads all channels from a single module and records them in a data FIFO. I have compiled successfully any FPGA code on this computer, so I should definitely have everything needed to compile.

    My system consists of one NOR cRIO 9030 with a single module 9220. Below is the Compilation of summaries.

    ---

    LabVIEW FPGA: Compilation failed due to an error of Xilinx.

    Details:
    ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:295]
    ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinksize is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:296]
    ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:301]
    ERROR: [Synth 8-1031] knidmahighspeedsinkbase is not declared [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:302]
    INFO: [Synth 8-2810] pkgshimswitchedlinkdmaportifc unit ignored due to previous errors [/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/PkgShimSwitchedLinkDmaPortIfc.vhd:68]
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Development of finished RTL: time (s): UC = 00:00:07. delay = 00:00:31. Memory (MB): peak = 798.605; gain = 204.203
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.
    INFO: [Common 17-83] release license: synthesis
    3 info, 0 Warnings, 0 critical warnings and 4 errors.
    synth_design failed
    : ERROR: [Common 17-39] 'source' is not due to previous errors.

    When running
    «source - notrace.» /. Xil/Vivado-6035-ip-10-60-203-176/realtime/toplevel_gen.tcl ".
    called inside
    «synth_design-top "toplevel_gen" - part "xc7k70tfbg676-1"-"full" flatten_hierarchy "»»
    (file "/ opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl" line 21)
    called inside
    "source" / opt/apps/NIFPGA/jobs/mC683d5_WCf98Qm/synthesize.tcl "" "
    exit #.
    INFO: [Common 17-206] exit Vivado at Tue Mar 24 23:58:54 2015...

    Compile time
    ---------------------------
    Introduction date: 24/03/2015-16:46
    Date recovered results: 24/03/2015-17:00
    Waiting time in the queue: 00:24
    Compilation of time: 13:22
    -Generate a Xilinx IP: 00:00
    -Summarize - Vivado: 01:27

    Compilation has restarted on
    24/03/2015-16:57

    ---

    Any help would be much appreciated!

    Thank you

    James.Morris wrote:

    Okay, so it seems that I get the error with a project from scratch and an FPGA with a single command and an indicator.

    I download the latest FPGA 2014 SP1 installation and I hope that will solve my problem.

    Well I'll mend, which fixed the problem! Somewhere along the line, my install FPGA must be corrupted.

    Thanks for the help, guys.

Maybe you are looking for