Example config for 2 management vlan and ip Routing.

Similar Questions

• Tagged management VLAN and the virtual machines on the same VLAN

  I'm faced with a problem related to our Brocade switches newly acquired and get the private VLAN to work on trunk connections to our ESX servers.  Every time I try something different, he creates a new problem.

  In our configuration, our management of VLAN is not tag and we have a VLAN for this management network that is placed on our switches VLAN no marked native.  We also have virtual machines hosted on those same ESX servers that are on the same VLAN and everything works fine.  However, when I change the ESX management to carry a label on this VLAN and change the switchports accordingly (IE no untagged VLAN native), management work, but hosted on the ESX Server machines that are on the same VLAN can get no network connectivity.

  Is it possible to have a management network labeled and also the host of virtual machines on the same VLAN or is it totally impossible?  I'm not very familiar with networking behind ESX, so I apologize if this is a dumb question with an obvious answer.

  Thank you

  Mark J.

  Is it possible to have a management network labeled and also the host of virtual machines on the same VLAN or is it totally impossible?

  Yes, it is possible... why it doesn't work for you I don't know, but try the following:

  1. set up the Group of ports of VMS to use VLAN;

  2 configure the interface of management VMkernel port group use VLAN;

  3 configure the physical switch port to allow to this VLAN and put the default VLAN natively for these interfaces.

• help config VLANs and inter routing VLANs on SF - 300

  Hi all.

  I divided the routing problem "SF-300 (Layer 3) can be connected to the bridge." I did not put in the entry door. Too bad, I have encountered with Packet Tracer 5. I can attach a file. Leave everything to me.

  Thank you.

  # config - code

  IP routing

  VLAN 10

  VLAN 20

  VLAN 30

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  switchport access vlan 10

  switchport mode access

  interface FastEthernet0/6

  switchport access vlan 20

  switchport mode access

  interface FastEthernet0/11

  switchport access vlan 30

  switchport mode access

  interface Vlan10

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  interface Vlan20

  address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0

  Vlan30 interface

  192.168.30.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  The configuration of the switch is fine. My only question is your computers. Example of

  Computer on fa1.

  Should be something like

  192.168.10.100

  255.255.255.0

  192.168.10.1

  Computer on Fa6

  192.168.20.100

  192.168.20.1

  255.255.255.0

  Also avoid any simultaneous wireless connection and you may want to disable things like firewalls of the window.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• After that 5 weeks back to Japan, Firefox still gives me Japanese sites - for example, search for 'cat' in ff and I get Japanese wikipedia, the same search in English product Safari. Boring!

  After his return from 5 weeks to the Japan, Firefox still gives me Japanese sites - for example, if I search for 'cat' in Google using Firefox and I get Japanese Wikipedia and a whole bunch of other Japanese sites. If I repeat the same search in Safari, I get the English Wikipedia. I read Japanese, but this does not mean that I want all the time! How can I fix?

  Clear the cache and cookies from sites that cause problems.

  "Clear the Cache":

  • Firefox > Preferences > advanced > network > storage (Cache) offline: 'clear now '.

  'Delete Cookies' sites causing problems:

  • Firefox > Preferences > privacy > Cookies: "show the Cookies".

• I want to config for different starting power and battery

  is there a way to stop certain applications running at startup only if running on battery?
  I framed and Mozilla Thunderbird running at startup but I just want this to be the case when it is plugged

  Hello KevinFrench,

  I don't know how to do this with Windows. You may need to see if there are 3rd party software available for your question.

  Thank you

• WAP321 VLAN and SG300 routing problem

  Hello

  I have a SG300 - 28 p as a main switch. Three WAP321 APs are connected with two SSID. A primary SSID is served on VLAN 1 and a guest THAT SSID is on VLAN 2.

  The SG300, I have three ports of junction for the WAP321s because they carry VLAN 1 and VLAN 2. 25 on the switch port is a port of access for VLAN 2 since the guest network is served by its own router and WAN access. The main LAN and Wireless is on the 192.168.101.x network and the network of comments (including cable) is on 192.168.24.x.

  Wireless connection to the WAP321, obtain the appropriate IP addresses (DHCP is served by routers - both are RV042s). On the main network (101), I am able to ping, access to the network. On the network of comments, I'm not able to ping to the router (192.168.24.222) or the 192.168.24.254 switch. However, it is not a problem if I'm on a wired connection to the router reviews.

  This makes me suspect that I missed certain routing or configuration on the SG300 for this configuration. Any advice? See the attached diagram below:

  Eugene

  Eugene, I think the problem is with the AP.  This is a clear indication of the fact you are wired in and have no problems.

  One thing that may be a scenario is external causes. Your computer is exclusively wireless or you have tested while wired + wireless? Have you tried with a second computer is wireless only?

  If you use a computer (s) strictly wireless, the problem is with the AP and can be somehow "mask" the network devices either.

  I know things like characteristic of guest network and captive portal has some mechanisms of protection because it is not about the guest to access the network devices. How is the configured access point? Everything just with 2 SSID and a username/password?

  I think that it is perhaps a good idea to look at how this Approach is implemented if there is any interference from external factors.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• wallet_location in the config of the managed provider of ODP has no effect

  Hi all

  Someone had a bit of luck by specifying the location of a portfolio of Oracle in the configuration of the managed provider. I can get portfolios Oracle works with managed and unmanaged provider, but only by specifying wallet_location in sqlnet.ora.

  The example configuration for the managed provider setting does not seem to have any effect. The example of my work stops to work if I remove wallet_location in sqlnet.ora. c:\snot\wallet includes ewallet.p12, cwallet.sso, ewallet.lck and cwallet.lck they were made to help create mkstore - and mkstore - createcredential. The portfolio works, if just done sqlnet.ora references, but I would rather this Setup is specific to app.

  Here is my config, just for reference:

  <? XML version = "1.0" encoding = "utf-8"? >

  < configuration >

  < oracle.manageddataaccess.client >

  < version number = "4.121.2.0" >

  < Parameters >

  < name of the parameter = value 'WALLET_LOCATION' = "(SOURCE = (MÉTHODE = FICHIER) (METHOD_DATA = (DIRECTORY = c:\snot\wallet)))"/ >))) "

  < name of the parameter = value 'TNS_ADMIN"="c:\snot"/ >

  < / Parameter >

  < / version >

  < /oracle.manageddataaccess.client >

  < / configuration >

  Regards Niels Jespersen

  Details added, discovered that wallet_override cheated on me.

  If sqlnet.wallet_override = true is in sqlnet.ora, then wallet_location in the config seems to work.  Now, I need help for wallet_override in .net config. It is not there, right now, is it?

  Niels cordially

• SGE2010 switches, VLAN and a port blocked by spanning tree

  People,

  I have 2 groups of switch.

  SGE2010 2 with VLANS is defined as 10,20 and 30

  VLAN 10 is the management VLAN and it uplinks to our border router.

  VLAN 20 is the workstation VLAN, and all workstations are pointing to the switch as their default GW

  VLAN 30 is the ip phone VLANS, and all phones use this as a gateway.

  I have a GAP between the switches said, we have a few servers on the ip phone switch that must be accessed by the clients of the workstation and the unique link of 100 MB through the router probably won't be enough.

  If I understand correctly, because the switches have different networks on them, a simple shift will not work. I did create a gap and addresses on each side, but it does not appear in this mode, I can block vlan 10 transit to the LAG, with this block I'll end with a logic loop and spanning tree will block the uplinks or LAG itself.

  I have attached a picture with a diagram of our current put in place.

  Any help/advice would be much appreciated.

  John, the 802 standard. 1 initial q indicates there isn't only global tree covering weight independently of belonging to a vlan. It's why you run into problems. Cisco has developed PVST to run on circuits of the ISL. BPMH was originally defined as 802. 1s, which is a combination of 802. 1 q + RSTP. The 802. 1s were later modified to become part of the 802. 1 q.

  The person is incorrect, because they cite "because spanning tree is construction by vlan. They are incorrect, because you have to set the properties of tree cover to allow the spanning tree protocols by vlan. Small business switches do not support the owner Cisco PVST and PVST +. However, the SB switches support BPMH which is a standard of the IEEE.

  How works the BPMH, it's that you have called proceeding, i.e. each construction covering tree. Then you have the region, SB switches support only 1 region. The region maintains the instances. Basically how it works, you activate the EMU at the global level. Then, you specify the instance. As an example, the vlan 1 is instance 1. VLAN 2 is 2.  This will allow you to run 2 physical wires between switches vlan different without looping. If you use classic STP or RSTP, the least costly path will go to the State to block/cast who works as expected.

  -Tom

• Storage for Lab Manager

  My client needs storage for Lab Manager running on 100 servers. Is it recommended to use the NAS or SAN for Lab Manager running and what type of e/s that you wait for the same thing?

  I did a little bit with storage of LM in recent years.

  I have a development/test environment on LM 600 machine, using 2 Sun 7210 storage devices (is no longer available) on NFS shares. We have 2 links 1 G servile vmKernel traffc as well as links to more vmnetwork, management, etc.  The devices are related to links of 4 x 1 G each.

  I don't know what are the current constraints of LM/ESX, but whenever we revisit the decision 'block vs NAS' we end up selecting NFS (our Sun boxes can present the iSCSI as easily).

  As Jon says, what storage you need certainly depend on your VMS and load.  NOTE: my experience is * NOT * in a production environment, where I am squeezing virtual machines performance.  It's more about the functionality and "adequate" performance (where "adequate" is a measure based on the user experience topic).

  Some things we have learned over the years:

  • IOPS / s are kings, and most of them are entries.  (Written at the moment, I have a few heavy ready operations push me down to about 65 percent.)  I saw > 80% of entries maintained for days.)
  • Latency does not seem as important - VMs run about the same at 10ms latency and latency 250ms NFS NFS.  When latencies above 750ms grows, they will be noticiable users and if they go more than a second over 1000 ms you will begin to see the impact on the guest OSes, especially Solaris x 86.
  • Normal operations don't care about bandwidth - just current execution machines don't even fill a link 1 G
  • Deployment operations * could * start filling to the top of the bandwidth, maybe
  • Betware storm IO.  Often people think the storm IO deployment/boot, but 400 RedHat machines all the kickoff of their 'updatedb' cron job at 04:00 can produce any IO storm as well.  NOTE: IMHO if you buy storage to handle this kind of thing, you're overpaying storage.  I've spread my cron through the night and now can not see on the graphs of storage performance.
  • There is * NOT * a good correlation between guest OS IOPS / s as shown, for example, iostat and PAHO are / s NFS presented to the storage system.  I'm guessing that ESX made a lot of caching.

  Most storage vendors I spoke last year does not seem to find it.  They think in terms of bandwdith and it accelerates with read cache, so unimportant in my environment - I had to push really hard to get sellers to think in the right conditions and some of them really seem out of their depth there.

  I think that this state of mind is important: consider the IOPS / s as you consider CPU: how much should I give to each machine?  How much should I oversubsubscribe?

  Like CPU, a physical machine which IO a lot more available that he needs and you can consolidate - but don't know how.  A physical machine with a pair of 15 k drives RAID1 has about 200 IOPS / s available and readers spend most of time inactive (a bit like the CPU).

  That will boost the machines and when?  Right now I'm on average 9 inputs/outputs by VM, which in my opinion is quite small.  My storage system can go higher under request, but I have enough machines that it is fairly constant.

  In my quest for the perfect storage of LM, I found the usual: good, not expensive or fast, you can choose any two.  How we use LM (lots and lots of shared models) we would really like a unique namespace shared (i.e. 1 data store). I have yet to find the 'perfect' - storage, the Suns are very profitable for the performance and space, but their management takes too much of my time and my 72XX are not expandable - the 74 might be a different experience.  I am currently looking to add some SSD storage, but the ideal configuration would be automated migratino between levels (for example, EMC QUICKLY) and if I bought only from EMC I would triple my cost per VM.

  I talked to people who have a pattern of use of different models that are quite happy on several data stores.  If you can move your load through many warehouses of data then Isilon looks like interesting storage.

  So, in summary:

  • Watch IOPS / s 1st, 2nd and 3rd, then the latency time, then (maybe) bandwidth
  • Manage the budget or the ability of the IOPS / s as you CPU
  • You may not use comments IOPS / s to provide shared storage IOPS / s

  I'm hoping to have a better storage solution in the next 6 months or more.

  --

  Dewey

• Connect 6224 VLAN routing and management VLAN

  Happy holidays all the world-

  I read several posts here and elsewhere on the inability of the 6224 to deliver its own management interface. OK, enough, I get it. But what I don't understand is a practical solution to what seems to be a huge problem if you want to use the network to connect to the device to manage (instead of the serial console port).

  Let's say I want to have three networks A, B, and C on the 6224 and configure it to route between any combination of them. Let's call them VLANS 1, 2, and 3. Three ethernet cables will connect to three ports on the 6224. for the network A, b and C. Let's just ignore shifts and redundant connections to do this.

  The management VLAN can not be assigned to one of these networks, right? He said in the documentation, and it turns out if you try to do it on the configuration of the switch. It doesn't let you do.

  So, how do you reach the 6224 for management? Create a fourth network, VLAN 4? This seems to be the general theme of the answers to questions like that, but how do you reach this seemingly isolated network? By definition, it cannot be routed. Any computer that you normally use on A, B or C, can not reach D.

  So what then? A dedicated computer for D who cannot reach the other thing than the switch management port? What about another completely separate router (I have a Cisco ASA with some ports to spare, or a hint of irony, an another 6224!) to provide a connection between D and a networks normally used? This is crazy.

  Of course, missing me something here. I can't believe that the answer is, 'If you enable routing, the management interface is essentially unusable"but that's what it looks like, from my possibly twisted point of view. I want to have my laptop computer and any other computer, sitting on a network that can be put to rout by the 6224, and for that same laptop also be able to reach this same 6224 management interface.

  Someone please help me understand this?

  Thank you

  Chris

  PS: I have an email address. It is almost unique on the entire planet. I use it to connect to this forum. But Dell, like so many others, insists on ignoring these facts and let me create an another unique identifier while playing a game of 20 questions. That's why my remarkably stupid random username.

  Thanks again, and I hope that someone gets at least a good laugh over this.

  Vlan management can be considered as a port OOB. If the intention is that it be separated from the rest of the traffic and on its own dedicated network. However, you are not limited to manage the switch through just the interface vlan management. Each VLAN with an IP address can be used by customers in this vlan to manage the switch.

  For example, if you assign a VLAN 2 address and ip 192.168.2.1. Customers in VLAN 2 with and the 192.168.2.x subnet ip address can access 192.168.2.1 to manage the switch, while being able to communicate with clients in other VLANs.

  I hope this helps some, let me know if you need help on your config, or to specify anything.

  Thank you

• ESXi 5, link group, VLAN and the Management Interface

  Greetings-

  I suspect that the answer to my question is: 'Buy an another NIC Intel' but here goes:

  I have a server ESXi here with 2 Intel GigE NIC, connected to the same switch managed ahead of Cisco.  A (vmnic0) NETWORK card is connected to the VLAN 200 while the second (vmnic1) is connected to the VLAN 300.  Ports on the Cisco are defined to access mode.

  Internally, the server ESXi, vmnic0 is connected to the 'public' vSwitch, while vmnic1 is connected to the "private" vSwitch

  I also updated the ESXi management IP 24 even as private vSwitch.  This is the key, I suspect.

  I tried to combine the two GigE interfaces in a connection unique 2xGigE and trunk two VLAN 200 and 300 through it.  After struggling through the menus on the ESXi console INTERFACE, I managed to get the IP management save and who responded and was able to connect to the server with the vSphere client.  I did it in X'ing the vmnic0 and vmnic1 in the configuration interface, then setting VLAN 300 in the configuration of VLANS.  But I could not the team/bundle correctly in the two vSwitches vmnic interfaces.  I could never attach a vmnic to one of the switches.

  Can I do all this with only 2 GigE interfaces and maintain access to IP management?

  SWITCH CISCO < == trunk w / VLAN 200 300 2xGigE == > SERVER ESXI

  VLAN 200 is a 28 audience

  VLAN 300 is a private 24 (for example: 192.168.100.0/24)

  IP management is 192.168.100.2

  I need to create a third VLAN for the management IP address and move?  If I master, say, VLAN 400 down to the ESXi server, use another block 192.168 for his IP address, I'll be able to take the vmnic0 and vmnic1 and team on the TWO vSwitches?

  Always follow me? ... :-)  If I can clarify this, by all means ask.  I apologize for the sort of random babbling here.  Thank you!

  JAS

  jasonvp wrote:

  Rickard Nobel wrote:

  You can not have your two vmnic (physical NIC ports) connected to two vSwitches and at the same time have a "grouping". You need to delete one of the vSwitches and recreate the vSwitch remaining trade. VLAN will insulate them even different networks.

  Thanks for the pointers; I finally had the opportunity to try this out and it works as expected.  I EF you the 'right answer' but apparently the forum won't let me since you already have an answer of "useful".

  Nice that you got it working! When you perform the actual configuration with vSwitch Hash IP and physical switch LAG config, it might be a little difficult to do things in the correct order to not lose connection to the ESXi host.

  You can select this message if you wish.

• Questions of VLAN and configuration for Cisco AIR-CT2504-25-K9 Controller

  Hello

  It's my first time thanks to the Cisco wireless solutions, so I was hopping someone could help me with the following:

  We just bought the AIR-CT2504-25-K9 controller with some points of access for the AIR-CAP1702I-E-K9.

  The network is as follows:

  Peripheral layer 3 (managed by third parties): it's on the domain network. (VLAN by default, 1 - unidentified)

  ADSL router - it's the network without comment thread. (Default Vlan 4 - tagged).

  VOIP: VLAN 5.

  Both fittings go into a switch Cisco SG500 52 (Layer 2). There is a port to shared resources on the switch SG500 with VLAN 1 (Tagged) and VLAN 4 (with tag). The WLAN controller is plugged into this port trunking.

  The data and management network are in the same subnet and on the same VLAN (1).

  I used the wizard on the controller setup.

  There are three interfaces:

  management VLAN ID 1 IP 192.168.1.2 Port 1 (configured with a gateway domain network, DHCP, etc.).

  VLAN wireless identifier 4 IP 192.168.5.1 Port 1 comments (configured with modem router ADSL, DHCP, etc.).

  Virtual IP 192.0.2.1

  Proxy DHCP active overall.

  There are two wlan networks:

  (1) area - management Interface - SSID abc.

  (2) comments - comments Wireless Interface - SSID xyz (the wizard put to management, but I changed it to the wireless).

  Are the AP connected to another SG500 switch which is shared resources to the switch with the controller.

  Ports of the APs are connected to have only 1 VLAN unidentified. They don't have 4 VLAN Tag or not identified. However, everything seems to work as expected.

  When I join the guest network (SSID xyz), I get an IP address from the router ADSL and all Internet traffic goes through him. When I connect to the domain network (SSID abc), I get an IP address from the DHCP in Windows Server and all traffic goes through the device of layer 3 (I checked the public IP address in my browser). I can't ping anything from one network to the other.

  My questions are the following:

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Thank you

  A

  Hello

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  Yes, I'm with CAPWAP:

  More information: http://lets-start-to-learn.blogspot.de/2014/08/cisco-wireless-understand...

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  If you want that mgmt interface must be unmarked and then put 0 otherwise you can use vlan 1.

  I do not have what is configured under mgmt and comments interface, but according to the name I'll say yes, you must set the comments under comments wlan interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Yes, there are many things that you can configure, but I'll leave most of the default of things unless you really need to change!

  The following best practices: http://www.borderlessccie.net/?p=270

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Implementation of VLAN and QoS for VOIP on SG200-18

  We recently purchased the smart switch SG200-18 to replace a Netgear switch. We are moving our phone service to VOIP through our local ISP as well.

  I currently have the VOIP phone plugged into Port 17 on SG200-18 (it is a Grandstream Cordless VOIP phone).

  I want to put the VOIP phone on one VLAN separate from the rest of the network and optimize QoS parameters so that the VOIP phone has exceptional audio quality even during network traffic.

  Here are my questions:

  1. do I need to set anything on the type of port to Port 17 (because it resembles a shape any Combo port)?

  2. How can I do to isolate VOIP telephone it's own VLAN (I see the parameters VLANS and VLAN voice, not sure that one to use;) I've tried to set a VLAN and broke the Internet connectivity on the phone until I went and removed)?

  3. do I need to adjust the QoS settings to switch to better optimize the VOIP phone?

  Some additional questions about the GS200-18 in general:

  1. do I need to adjust the parameters of the system on the switch time? I am in the Central time.

  2. do I need to adjust the Green Ethernet/Energy Saving parameters or should I stay with the default settings?

  In addition, a couple of "getting started" questions for Cisco:

  1. I registered an account My Cisco. What should I do to register my switch with Cisco and associate with my My Cisco account?

  2. What are the benefits of purchasing a contract of Cisco Small Business support, and how much would it cost the SG200-18 (I ordered it from Provantage)? I'm curious to see if it's worth the money.

  Here's my 'features ':

  Switch: SG200-18

  VOIP phone: Grandstream DP715 and 710 handsets

  Plugged in: Port 17 on SG200-18

  Services: Internet Local (Direclynx)

  Type of connection: 3 m down / 500 k up DSL move to a future wireless connection that will give us higher speeds

  Backend VOIP provider: VOIP Innovations

  Router: Apple Airport Extreme AC model (all Macs and iOS devices and the OS X Server on the network, so I use the Apple router facilitates installation, because is not QoS, trying to QoS and VLAN in the switch)

  Thank you all!

  Hello

  I'll just go to the list again:

  1. sounds good in the port from the drop-down list. So can I just connect the VOIP phone and go with it, correct?

  Yes, just plug in ethernet combo port and it will work.

  2. is not an issue, but I agree, Apple likely isn't compatible QoS or VLAN.

  3. thanks for the info on time/NTP settings. If I wanted to go there and try to configure NTP, how much is it and what I have to do? I want to I can give it a quick try.

  To Setup NTP on the switch is quite simple.  Go to Administration > Time Settings > time system and check the boxes to activate the main clock Source (SNTP)

  Then go to the settings of the SNTP page and add a new entry with the IP address of an NTP server.  There is a list of available NTP servers here:

  http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/

  You must also ensure that the switches Administrative default gateway is set correctly (it must be set the to the default gateway, probably the most convenient airport) so the switch can contact the NTP server.  That option is set under Administration > Interface Management > Interface IPv4.  Change the user-defined default gateway and enter the IP address of your airport (or whatever your default gateway for your network)

  4 sounds good on the Green Ethernet settings. I'll leave it as default value.

  Yes, better to just let those unless you have weird problems with ports disconnect, who can sometimes be caused by Green Ethernet, but if there's nothing like leave it on and save a few watts.

  5 sounds good on does not need to attach my passage to my Cisco account. Should I fill out a form any registration of the product with Cisco before calling support?

  It is not a record for support.  The only thing we need you to do is to create a Cisco account, but you have already done this, so if/when you call in support, you just need your ID for Cisco (also called a CCOID sometimes) and the serial number of your switch.

  6. thanks for the info on the Service contract. Is it something that I would need to order directly from Cisco or I who would get my Cisco partner (Provantage)? After the three years is up, treat yourself to renewal or it just falls? Is there a certain amount of time I have to buy the Service Contract forward make me ineligible?

  Support contracts are purchased through a partner Cisco, or you can get them online for the CDW or Newegg for example.  Basically, you have until the expiry of your current aid for the purchase of a new contract.  For example, right now your switch comes with 1 year of technical support.  You can only buy a contract while it is still active.  Once your three-year contract is about to run out, you're in the same situation.  You can renew it before it expires, however if you leave is up, you will not be able to put a contract on it.  Contracts are not my specialty, however, so you can check with your partner for complete details.

  7. sounds good to how data use VOIP calls. His dislikes too. :-)

  I agree, a voice call is not much traffic.  What you have described you probably don't have problems, although of course I can't guarantee that.

  8. because it is from your provider and they specifically mentioned the VOIP, I would say that you'll be fine here.

  You had also placed on your airport using access point behind a router in small businesses.  I would like to say that it is possible, a large number of wireless routers have an option to put access point only mode or something like that, but you should check with Apple on how to do it.

  Insofar as a Small Business router if you decide to upgrade for the options VLAN or QoS, I would recommend the RV180, or perhaps the RV320.  Two of these models are available with or without wire depending on what you decide to do with the airport.

  I think I got all the questions, but if not just let me know,

  Christopher Ebert - Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Impossible to install the software to receive error message like "16-bit MS-DOS subsystem config.nt msiexec.exe file system not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Applications."

  Hello

  Original title: problem installing the software
   
  When my wife tries to install software (for example the updates of Windows or Itunes) on his Dell laptop (Windows Vista Home Premium), she gets this error developed box.
  "the 16-bit MS-DOS subsystem
  The msiexec.exe config.nt file this system is not suitable for running MS-DOS and Microsoft Applications. »
  Grateful for any ideas on how to fix this problem!

  Hello

  1. what 16-bit or software program you try to run? Should I use the CD Rom drive?

  2 - is the question also appear during the installation of Windows updates?

  3. have you made changes on the computer before this problem?

  Follow the methods and check them out below:

  Method 1: Perform a clean boot and check.

   

  To help resolve the error message, you can start Windows Vista or Windows 7 by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  
  Please note:  After troubleshooting, be sure to start your computer in normal mode by following step 7.

  Method 2:

  Run an analysis of auditor of system files on your computer and check for the issue.

  How to use the System File Checker tool to fix the system files missing or corrupted on Windows Vista or Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

  Method 3: Solve problems with programs that cannot be installed or uninstalled

  http://support.Microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall

  Hope the above information is helpful.

• Problem Manager of horizontal scrolling for OS 6.0 and more?

  Hi all. I have a problem with the Manager of Horizontal scrolling. Every thing worked for OS 5.0 and below, the question arises for OS 6.0 and more. For example, check the following:

  I have 2 HFM added to the optimization of resources.

  HFM1 - contains 2 buttons.

  HFM2 - contains 6 buttons, and the user can scroll between the buttons.

  The questions is when user keep hitting the right key, when the focus is on the second button of HFM1, then the content of HFM2 scrolls to the right - what is bad behavior.

  Check the screenshot for Simulator 9810 (when scrolling to the right inside the HFM which contains the test1, test2 scrolls the second HFM):

  

  Scrolling in a managing scrools in another, why this happen and how that might be solved?

  Thank you in advance.

  Finally, I found a solution using ScrollChangeListener (SCL).

  So what I did I set the SCL for HFM2, then:

   public void scrollChanged(final Manager manager, int newHorizontalScroll,
              int newVerticalScroll)
      {
  
          //----> fixing the issue when one HFM scroll another one for OS 6.0 and above
          int fwf = manager.getFieldWithFocusIndex();
          if (fwf == -1)
              manager.setHorizontalScroll(0);
          //<---- fixing the issue when one HFM scroll another one for OS 6.0 and above
  
  }
  

  Thanks to all in any case.