Exchange 2003 / 2010 on vshpere foundation 4.1

Similar Questions

• SBS 2003 migrating exchange 2003 to exchange 2010

  Hello

  It is possible o migrate from exchange 2003 on SBS 2003 to new windows server 2012 STD with exchange 2010, but does not move the FSMO rules to windows 2012? I can't downgrade SBS 2003 because I have an application that cannot be migrated from Small Business SERVER 2003.

  Best regards

  Marcio Moreira

  Try asking in Exchange Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=exchangeserve

• How can I restore and old information store (Exchange 2003) to my Exchange Server existing (Exchange 2010)

  Nice day

  3 months ago I installed Exchange Server 2010, now I need to recover a mailbox from a backup. The backup was performed while he was still Exchange 2003. I want to know is you can restore an old Exchange 2003 database in the Exchange 2010 recovery store, and if so what is the way forward. PS I use symantec backup exec 2010 R3 as backup software.

  If it is not possible, is there any other way to retrieve mailbox information

  Any help will be much appreciated.

  Hello Wh@pd@p,

  I suggest posting your question on our forums TechNet for Microsoft Exchange Server, located here again:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

• Exchange 2003 migration to Exchange 2010

  Dear Sir/Madam

  I have a partner who has a parent and a child domain, it has exchange 2003 is installed in the child domain.

  He wonders if he can install exchange 2010 in the partner area & migrate all the exchange 2003 from the child domain in the newly installed exchange 2010 in the area of the partner.

  Please repost your request in one of the most appropriate Microsoft Exchange Forums.  Thank you!

• Deployment of Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 environment

  Hello

  I recently installed Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 environment.  I need help on migrating all my settings to Exchange 2010 - mailbox recipient policies, address book offline, free/busy, etc.
  I looked these TechNet following help sheets, but by getting a little confused:
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719.aspx (Exchange 2013 requirements)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332348.aspx (upgrade of the Exchange 2003 Client Access)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998186.aspx (Exchange 2003 - Planning Roadmap for upgrade and Coexistence)

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee681662.aspx (to install Exchange 2010 in a mixed Exchange 2003 and Exchange 2007 organization)
  I have two domain controllers.  Exchange 2010 is not installed on a domain controller, but Exchange 2003 is one of them.  I would like to eventually decommission the Exchange 2003 environment and implement and to Edge transport server in its place.  Exchange 2010 is installed on a Virtual Machine.  It running SP3, the latest service pack.  Exchange 2003 is on a physical machine, and it running SP2.
  Please help me simplify what exactly I have to do to migrate configurations from 2003 to 2010.
  Thank you for your much appreciated assistance.

  TK

  Unfortunately is not on this site.  Server questions should be asked on Technet

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

• Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange

  Hello

  I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time

  the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.

  Server - SBS2003

  Customers - Office 2007 and 2010

  Thank you

  Ty

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  And here:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• Problem syncing blackBerry Z10 Z10 Exchange 2003

  Z10 os 10.2.1.537 - exchange 2003 / outlook 2010 (cached mode)

  When I open outlook 2010 on my pc, the new messages are syncronised well from exchange. After my Z10 E-mail properly synchronized. When I close my pc outlook and I get out of my office, my Z10 stop to sync email until I return back and restart outlook.

  With a BB os7, everything works fine.

  solved!

  the problem is McAfee Groupshield for Exchange server.

  Must enable proactive analysis on e-mail file to correctly enable connections from Iphone/Android/BB smart os10, after the closure of the station of office outlook.

• Virtualization of Exchange 2003

  We are about to start (finally) virtualization of our systems.  One of these systems is a Standard Exchange 2003 on Windows 2003, using DAS server and serves about 600 boxes mailbox (if users concurrent max would be around 200 users).  Current physical area includes 3 disks, C, D and E.  C is for system D is application/newspapers and E is for banks to information (only 2 - public and private).

  After reading the various articles and best practices I came with a plan.  Could you get it someone please let me know if it is a good idea?

  In a test environment first of all (with DC operation), separated from the production network:

  Plan of P2V is the current physical Exchange box using VMware Converter Standalone.   Each physical disk would be converted to a virtual disk.  It will implement a SAN to shared storage iSCSI.  Thought create LUNS separate D and E drives, just don't know if this is necessary.  All Exchange and protection antiviruss services will be stopped during the P2V.  I tried to make a cold-clone, but don't know if I can due to the fact that we won't have a VMware enterprise license.

  Once that P2V is complete, power to the top of the new virtual machine.  Remove any vendor (HP Insight) specific applications and drivers.  Then, start the Exchange services and test.

  If successul, process document, repeat the test and before you run on the production system.  Once final, production VM is created, physical stop and turn on VM again.

  If you're ok with the unsupportability of the solution, then I say go ahead and virtualize it.  I still believe that deploying a new server and migrate the mailboxes are the cleanest way to do but to understand the limitations it.  All the more that I would recommend if you could back migration to Exchange 2010 rather than another server in 2003.  There is no direct upgrade from Exchange 2003 to 2013 path so you will need to go to Exchange 2010 in a first time in any case.  Might as well get ready now.

  Migration is easier because then you're not taking all issues with the server of your virtual infrastructure.  It is also pointless to worry about uninstalling the hardware drivers, of unnecessary software, etc.

  I had some success with P2V migration running on Exchange servers.  As I said earlier, you will have the best chance of success if you can organize the downtime to stop all of the Exchange during the P2V services.  That's how I managed in the past.

  Do your homework and understand what works best for you.  I'm sure you can succeed with two approaches.

  Good luck!  Feel free to come back and post how things went or if you need any help.

  Matt

  http://www.thelowercasew.com

• Equipo physical Exchange 2003 Virtualizacion

  People:

  Hace unos dias realice the virtualizacion of a server of a Exchange 2003 a TIB con (Acronis) starting from UN archivo VMware vCenter Converter Standalone. El proceso is realizó sin problemas. Luego montar el equipo, configurar el red useful again e instalar los VM aditions, este inicio con errores Comunicación con los DCs.

  Is el proceso virtualizacion are material to UN cambio como of (if no me equivoco) tender that perform Exchange/disasterrecovery reinstalacion una y luego el ultimo restore respaldo exchanging?

  Dato: has los equipos conectaron a este virtualizado Exchange, luego apagar el mismo e iniciar el equipo Exchange physical, what renombrar el archivo OST hubo para los Outlook pudieran volver a connect.

  Saludos.

  Hola

  También he visto otro "low performance" hilo in Iberia, y siempre lo mismo, to virtualiza muchos procesadores (o mas 2-4) a solo uno, y eso dedicate o no decreased the Máquina una barbaridad.

  Lo del raid, yo siempre UN raid 10 tr aconsejo comment are possible, if no, al menos raid United Nations, 1.

  Te Aa±ado mi en el otro hilo provision:

  
  Re: Maquina recien virtualizada tarda mucho en arrancar
  12. 20-ago-2010 14:33 en respuesta a: akumal2
  Pulsar para ver el perfil de Samquejo Master
  Samquejo
  623 publicaciones desde
  11-dic-2008
  Buenas
  
  A vueltas con los procesadores....
  
  Lo primero, ¿que tasa de carga tiene el procesador inicial?, si la máquina va mal con un Xeon PIII@900, el que se ejecute en un core de un X5500 no va a resolver gran cosa si es por tema de rendimiento (obiamente va mejor, pero no el doble de mejor)
  
  Si la máquina original (pongamos un DGaviion con 2 Xeon PII 300 y 256 de ram con NT Enterprise) tiene 2 procesadores, echando cuentas deberian tener 300+300 y por lo que he leido hasta aqui, un core de cualquier procesador actual debaría valer.
  La realidad es que si esa máquina (me da igual el procesador, el sistema operativo y la ram que tenga) se cambia a menor en alguno de los componentes físicos, lo lógico es que pierda rendimiento, aunque corra en un hp blade 680 G7 (4 hexacores).
  
  En principio y salvo muy raras excepciones yo siempre virtualizo 1 a 1. (en las excepciones entran los procesadores HT y solo respeto los cores en la serie P4-478) con lo que pongamos el primero de los procesadores, Xeon de PIII a 900, que en un 2003 representa 4 cores en 2 pastillas. En este caso le virtualizo a 2 vcpu y pruebo su rendimiento. En los casos en los que son xeon PIV a 2000 por ejemplo (sin HT) en 2 pastillas, se quedaría igual, con 2 vcpu.
  
  Al igual que en un ESX, el tema de las cpu en la VM es delicado porque pueden tener aplicaciones y servicios multihilo a los que el KB de microsoft no les afecta para nada (oracle es un buen ejemplo, cristal reports, GIS, y alguna mas). Y ademas, las herramientas de inventario como puede ser el capcity (de vmware o de m$) o perfmon suelen registrar poco o nada de esto ya que los servicios arrancan incluso antes que el monitorizador o el servicio wim (y no digamos que caiga una consulta en ese momento) por lo que puedes tener en apariencia una máquina física muy sobredimensionada, que al reducirla durante su virtualización caiga por su propio peso.
  
  Y dicho esto, recojo y me voy de vacaciones :)
  Ahi queda.
  
  Si esta u otra respuesta es util, por favor marca su correspondiente notificador.
  
  Gracias/Regards 
  

  If esta u otra respuesta're util, por favor su marca used notificador.

  Gracias / looks

• How Transport rules Exchange Server 2010 takes immediately?

  Hey guys, I meet a riddle in my daily work.

  It's rules of transport in exchange server 2010.

  I made a few rules in use. Rule A for DynamicDistributionGroup A and article B for DynamicDistributionGroup B.

  Obviously, the two DynamicDistributionGroups are the corresponding OUs. OR A and B OU in Active Directory.

  Now I move user C OR B OR A. I thought that user C will use the B rule immediately, but I'm wrong.  He uses the rule until I restart

  the mail server.

  So here's my question: How does Exchange Server 2010 Transport rules take immediately?

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Kindly forward your Question in the TechNet Forums of Exchange Server.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?category=ExchangeServer

  See you soon.

• Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO

  Hi all

  Merry Christmas to start!

  I work for a company that run Exchange 2003. We plan to do a migration to Office365 and I am researching on the best solution.

  I am aware that there are three main options available, hybrid/intermediary/putting in service.

  My instincts suggest that the best option would be to complete the migration using the staging process, but I think that if I take this route I can't implement single sign on? This is the case...

  If so, is this means to ensure single sign-on can be used, then I can only implement a hybrid solution?

  Hello

  And a Merry Christmas to you, too.

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Please repost your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• How to switch my domain server 2003 & exchange 2003 Server

  I have Windows 2003 Server domain with exchange 2003 server running on the same machine, I want to improve my server domain to Windows server 2008, both my exchange to Exchange Server 2007 server, tell me the procedure, if I upgrade my server exchange server or domain first. What are the steps to do this.

  Support is located in the Windows Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

  Support is found in the Exchange Server forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/

• Can I remove asp dot net 2.0 on an exchange server 2010

  I have a client with an exchange server 2010, and they are required to have a completed quarterly PCI scan. Last quarter of what they narrowly but this time around the issue needs to be resolved.

  90780 - Microsoft ASP.NETValidateRequest filters bypass the Cross-Site Scripting VulnerabilityCVE-2008-3842, CVE-2008-3843

  Comment by ASV:

  There is no fix available for now; Please consider implementingmitigating controls (firewall, traffic filtering, etc.) to answer these questions. For

  specific information about how to restore these questions please consult the technical report below.

  I thought that if I unregister the net 2.0 from the owa site would correct this problem.

  In the point only remove net 4.0 is installed.   When I browse the C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\ I see

  14/06/2011 16:32

  v1.0.3705

  2009-07-13 23:20

  v1.1.4322

  27/06/2012 12:26

  v2.0.50727

  14/06/2011 14:32

  v3.0

  14/06/2011 16:32

  v3.5

  19/08/2012-13:30

  v4.0.30319

  In IIS

  Default Web site, aspnet_client, system_web 2_0_50727 & 4.0.30319 reside here with nothing in the files when viewed.

  There is no server expert here, this is a user forum.  Check out the TechNet forums, this is where you find people from server.

• Exchange 2003 with clusters

  Hello

  I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise

  Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter

  I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?

  Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me

  Kind regards

  Patricia

  Hello SwapnilJain27,

  It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.

  You can find the category that fits your question below:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

  Thank you!

• Exchange Server 2010 - Unable to download POP3 mail

  Using Exchange Server 2010 and configured POP3. When you use Outlook express POP3 to download mail

  I get error "Message number 1 could not be found. "Account: XXXXXXXXX server: 192.168.1.13 protocol POP3, server response: 'ERR Server Unavailable 21', port 110, secure (SSL): no, server 0x800CCC90, error number error: 0x800420CD.
  Checked the scale in the Advanced tab "this server requires a secure SSL connection."

  ASK THE QUESTION IN THE EXHANGE SERVER FORUMS:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer/