For Canon 7 d camera profiles?

Similar Questions

• Lenses for Canon EF200mm f1.8L profile

  I don't know if this has been answered before or not, but I'm looking for a profile of lenses for the Canon EF 200 mm f1.8L. Such a profile exist? If this is not the case, how can I request the creation of this profile?

  Thank you

  Shawn

  It doesn't seem to be all available. Because it would be a rare goal there would unlikely be Adobe produce one, however you can create (and share) one yourself with your camera/s.

  The tool is here: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lensprofile_creator/

  Don't forget to share!

• Camera profile information

  Where can I find descriptions on the camera profiles. The search of site turns up nothing.  Specifically, how can I determine if I have the latest Canon and Nikon camera profiles?  We mainly use the 5DM 2, D3/D700 DSLRs.

  I fear more precisely if the Nikon D3/D700 profiles are up to date because they seem to (in my eyes) have a few quirks happening.  It seems to be a useless compromise between specific colors and highlights the contrast, especially orange vs.  I am lucky to have a very keen sense for certain color of hairs and can tell when it's not perfect.  The color seems to be more precise, when the whites are completely blown!  Attempts to make my own so fixed the contrast, but with very unacceptable colors.

  I have seen a few articles left 3rd, but they tend to wander, and I have no idea of their veracity.   Are there "white papers" on that?  And are there links to verify the dates of stock profile?  Is there a list of current profiles?  Any help would be appreciated becuse I feel like I'm constantly Googling dead-ends.

  Thanks for all the help and links! For lack of time, I tend to learn only as digital good things that are necessary to get a photo to his audience. One day, I need to catch up with the tech.

  Glad to hear that this fixed your problem. It's a shame that you have to be a computer engineer to create face to all upgrades of the operating system of a mess! Like you, I want to spend less time than necessary to achieve my goals with computer applications. We will try to help you whenever you're stuck!

• Missing camera profiles

  When I'm in Raw worm 6.3.0.79 and go in the Calibration of the camera, I only get the choice of generic Canon under the camera profile. How can I get the profile for my Canon 50 d in there?

  The situation you describe is normal.  As stated earlier, profiles provided by Adobe is not the name of the camera in them when listed in ACR and LR, because they're all at your camera.

  You can create your own profiles using DNG Converter from the laboratory Adobe profile and an X-Rite Color Checker or X-Rite Color Checker passport which combines software and corrector of color.  When you create your own profiles you can name them what you please.  You could also decompile the profiles of the Adobe with something like dcpTool and insert your name in these copies.

• Could not find target for Canon profile 10-18mm lens.

  Hi, I have LR CC. When I click Activate profile correction LR is not able to find the profile for Canon 10-18mm. Selects the Canon 10-22mm instead. I was going on the lens profile support list and it is said that 10-18mm is supported to LR 5.6V. Then why can't I see in my LR? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

  [Left the forum Cloud/Installer generic for program specific forum... MOD]

  Hello kar,

  Please follow the below thread related to the same issue.

  Why can I not see my camera calibration profiles

  Default locations of Lightroom 5

  It will be useful,

  ~ Mohit

• Adobe Camera Raw support for Canon 5 d? (PS CS6)

  (for example this question in the present case, the forum of Photoshop)

  (1) how shift is planned between the introduction of the Canon 5 d camera (approx. June) and Adobe support in Adobe Camera Raw (ACR)?  In my reading elsewhere, it looks like 2 to 6 months, according to the WRT calendar ACR release schedule - anyone can refine this wait a little?

  (2) will support provided in ACR to Photoshop CS6 update?
  (Adobe will force us right here to you either subscribe to CC to get the update to ACR or "jump ship" to another company of product image edition?)
  .. .in this case, finally, I must leave the ship, but I don't want to .)

  I saw a statement in this blog that Adobe will provide support to the new camera press PS CS releases.
  but this is a blog of 2011 announcement so it was average before CC is out, so I wonder how it is true these days.

  Thanks for any help...

  New cameras are usually added to the next version of the plugin ACR and LR after the device is available for sale.  In the past, a new version of ACR/LR is published every 3-4 months and new cameras are released whenever the manufacturers want, so it can be anywhere from a few weeks to several months of delay, according to the sequence of the output of the camera and the next version of the regular software.  Sometimes it seems that Adobe will delay a plug-in version to be able to include a new important camera in it, but other times a popular camera buyers wait several months.  Adobe has the hours fixed for the releases aren't so rushed by releasing a new plug-in whenever a new camera model is released.   Only a wait of six months would be for a device that is difficult to sustain immediately and requires an innovation for the decoding process raw, rather than just the usual camera-profiling which is not so difficult.

  As for your other question about if CS6 will include support for the 5 d, now Adobe sells CS6 and CC so they provide a new camera support via plug-ins updates of ACR for both.  It remains to be seen if CS6 is still sold by the new time camera support is added for the 5 d or not and will probably be a business decision based on factors totally foreign to the 5 d.

• Camera profiles and the Canon software

  Hello

  Why the photo in Lightroom camera profiles are different than the same style of name chosen in Digital Photo Professional photo? They must produce the same EXACT of the RAW file version. I say that they ARE, because otherwise that's true - who had the true colors (e.g. faithful style is supposed to represent colors exactly if shot at 5200K, yet loyal DPP differs from faithful LR?)

  Also, is there a way to convert other image styles we created in profiles in Lightroom perhaps through some use of DNG Profile Editor?

  Thank you

  Juan

  They must produce the same EXACT of the RAW file version.

  The profiles are intended to give approximately the same rendering on the tone and color. You may not return exactly the same thing that Canon uses proprietary algorithms that cannot use Lightroom. Profiles approximately just those who use RAW of Lightroom conversion engine. Also, they come only close if you use the default settings of your camera, so not a priority to highlight, no saturation added, etc. If you want exactly the same thing, shoot jpeg or convert the raw for tiff in DPP. That said, my experience is that the corresponding profiles of the camera very close to off-camera as long as you do not change styles.

  I say that they ARE, because otherwise that's true - who had the true colors (e.g. faithful style is supposed to represent colors exactly if shot at 5200K, yet loyal DPP differs from faithful LR?)

  None of the styles of Canon gives accurate. This is not what they are supposed to do. They are supposed to be visually appealing, which differs very precise. Faithful is not really correct color target scene. See for some measures than on one of the more specific cameras, the Canon 5 D mk II, here. How to get the correct color, if that's what you are interested, is to shoot a colorchecker chart and use free Adobe's DNG profile editor to generate a profile calibrated for your camera.

  Also, is there a way to convert other image styles we created in profiles in Lightroom perhaps through some use of DNG Profile Editor?

  Lol would be nice, but is not currently possible without a lot of manual work. You can shoot a colorchecker and comparing the rendering in the DNG profile editor to the DPP in visually and using the tools of patch, you might be able to get there, but this will be very tedious. I think if we could give DNG Profile Editor, a different target that made perfect of the colorchecker, because at the present time, the only way to do it is Visual.

• Why Canon does not have old adapters for my SLR camera lenses? I can get them with Sony, but not for Canon

  I have an old Canon Ftb with a goal of 1.4 fd. I'm getting into digital cameras now (just to have a 12 G for now, mainly used for underwater photography). I would like to stay with Canon, but I'm very annoyed that Canon doesn't have a way to continue to use their old lenses. Nikon, for all their flaws are much better at you can continue to use your old stuff.

  Then I find that if I'm going to Sony (Yes, really, Sony) can I use my lenses from Canon ol via an adapter. This my Canon, tell me it ain't so. You must have a way, I just have not yet discovered.

  There are many challenges with this and the "adapters" are to be considered with a certain scepticism.

  The FD lenses are mechanical - no electronics.  The case of the unit, on the other hand, has an electronic interface for the lens - nothing of mechanics.   This means that if you set the goal, you would have to manually set the aperture but also of manual focus of the lens.

  Your Canon DSLR had a split Prism focusing in the viewfinder to help.  A new camera does not work.  The reason why there is no help from the development is because most of the lenses are autofocus so it is simply not necessary.  This makes it particularly difficult to tell when you've worn exactly the goal.  Making it even more difficult is that any device with a sensor size of APS - C (most of them) have a small viewfinder that you had on your Canon SLR photography.

  In addition, the lenses are optimized for a specific back focus distance.  Canon's EOS cameras have a depth of 44 m from the mounting flange of lens at the front of the body at the level of development within the body.  When you use an adapter, it modifies that distance.  If you change too much, the lens behaves as if it is mounted with extension tubes, the entire range of focus is moved closer to the camera, and it can be is no longer able to focus to infinity.

  There are 3 parties that make these lenses... conversion kits but they do them for a few drinks (not all) and that they require a bit of surgery on the goal (e.g. this level which protrudes beyond the rear of the lens used to set the aperture value should go).

  But... the modern lenses are just so much better than the old FD lenses.   Requires really quite the dozen FD lens to make it interesting this fuss.  Also, I own a Canon SLR (AE-1) and a few glasses of FD... but have no interest in trying to use one of these lenses on my EOS DSLR cameras.

  I think that this question almost as Ford asking why they do not wheel adapters let wheels it T model mount on a Mustang of 2015.  The new wheels are so much better than the old wheels, you want to continue to use the old wheels.

  Leave your old lenses in the past.  Mine are on the shelf alongside my AE-1... body as a conversation piece.  I don't actually use them.

• Camera profile v2 for Nikon D4s in Lightroom CC

  Hello

  I just installed Lightroom 6 and I find two versions profiles for Nikon D4S.

  Example, there are the profile " " Standard camera" and the profile " ""standard camera v2 "." That means this version 2 of the camera Profile?

  Tank you

  There have been second versions of profiles for some cameras. The first profiles do not meet the needs of the users, so a second profile was created. The original has been preserved for those who have used the profile and wanted to continue to do so.

• Problem of calibration of WB with 1DX Mark II camera profiles

  It seems that the calibration of the WB's messy hair for the color simulation profiles 1DX Mark II manufacturer.

  For example, a + 5100 17 WB value becomes 4300-13 when the profiles using colorimetric simulation manufacturer instead of Adobe Standard.

  This should be a quick and easy solution to your software engineers, I guess?

  Thanks in advance!

  I downloaded a sample 1DX Mark II file here: Canon 1DX II Image Test digital camera digital, camera

  The ACE shot WB is 5350-21 Adobe Std and -4350 50 Std of the camera, but the World Bank is the same for both. Using the pipette WB I get 5700-19 Adobe Std and 4650-47 with correct WB (R = G = B). Clearly the 'Caméra' profiles are incorrect to WB settings should be the same as the Standard Adobe. My Canon 300 d, 600 d, and 5 d MKII all show the same WB As Shot or parameters when you use the pipette WB.

  Surrephoto wrote:

  However, after having tasted a white area or map using the pipette WB, the value is locked regardless of the profile used and will result in wrong WB if you switch between these profiles.

  I'm not sure what you mean by "value is locked." When you use the pipette WB it changes the settings of temperature and tint values. If you change the profile of the camera should not change the settings of the WB. The issue is due to different WB settings in the 'Camera' profile vs Adobe Standard profile.

  I modified the 1DX Mark II camera Standard profile using Adobe DNG Profile Editor (DPE) as below and values is now about the same (±50 Temp, tinted ±1) to the values for the parameters "As Shot" and pipette Adobe Standard WB WB. Since I don't own a Canon Mark II 1DX I suggest you report the problem here: https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family.

  Click on 'New message' and follow the instructions and select the Type of Conversation > problem. Please, include a link to this post in the report and add an answer here with a link to the new report. Thank you! If you need help let me know.

  DPE: WB calibration changed to Temp-11, Edit > WB Reset for the current Image, save new camera profile to the folder "User".

  

• Camera profiles

  Is it possible to download and insert the profile of camera for Canon EF 16-35mm II lens in LR v4.4 (not a sub-cloud)?

  Hi Pemaquid,

  The profile of this lens is not available for Lightroom 4.4

  You can give a try to download the profile and put in the right place:

  Where Lightroom install camera and lens profiles? «Julieanne Kost's Blog»

  Kind regards

  Claes

• How can I find the camera profiles and load them in Camera Raw?

  I did a clean install of Windows 7 and reloaded all my apps. Photoshop CS5 Camera Raw used to show my Canon 60 d and its objective, and he has now no camera profile. I found a way to search the photo/target device profile in Photoshop (filter - Correction of the goal), but not how to save him, so I have to do whenever I load PS I can not yet know how to get one in Camera RAW. Doesn't seem like it should be so difficult. I should have thought of it when I'm in charge of CS5, but now I can't seem to get there. I thought that a quick Google trip would solve the problem, but without SOAP so far. A lot of advice on the use of profiles, but nothing (except the invalid pages), saying: how to get things pretty in there first. Any help would be appreciated.

  Have you installed the update to camera raw 6.7?

  Adobe - Photoshop: for Windows: Camera Raw 6.7 update

  You should probably search, download and install the other photoshop cs5 updates, if you have just installed photoshop cs5.

  Updates

• Failed to load custom camera profiles

  I use the two 3.5 Lightroom and Photoshop CS5 on a system of Windowx XP - Pro 64 bit with 8 GB of RAM and a lot of disk space.

  I use a X-rite color Checker to generate profiles of cameras custom whenever I do portraits or other color photo critique sessions. The camera profile is usually placed in the

  «Documents and Settings\...» {user...} Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles application 'folder.

  When I try to apply a profile to either lightroom or ACR created profile one is not visible in the list box dropdown camera profile. When I check to see if the profile exists in the appropriate folder, it does.

  I used color profiles before and have always been able to create, and then select a profile. Now I'm more able to do that. I'd rather do not re-install all of my Adobe software since then I have to reinstall all updates and plug-ins.

  How can I get lightroom and ACR to see these profiles and use them?

  OK I understand my problem and it seems that it was a combination of things.

  First: X-Rite color checker cannot create a profile if any of the colors in the image channels are cut. Exposure via the Camera Raw/Lightroom setting and save the file with a DNG do not help the changes in the metadata and not the raw file. I tried to convert a TIF file after making the setting of the exhibition and then to a DNG, it enabled me to then save it as a DNG that X-Rite software then allowed me to create a profile without errors. However, this new profile was not visible in the menu of the camera Calibration.  The reason for this is that in the file real .dcp, instead of having the type of specified device, TIF.

  Second: The type of embedded camera (Canon 5 d, Nikon D90, etc.) in the profile must match the type of camera in the metadata of the image you are trying to apply the profile for. Apparently, Lightroom/ACR, only to see profiles that correspond to images taken by the same type of device. This is logical, since my two different bodies have different profiles. If you shoot with two different bodies, you need to apply profiles separately in lightroom. You must sort the images by camera type, then apply/sync profile applicable to each camera camera separately.

  Third: I found a solution to the question of my overexposed color checker, but unless you are comfortable with the binary .dcp for editing the file with a binary editor, I suggest you only add 1/2 to a complete stop during the filming of the color checker. The problem is that red typically clips before any other color, and since your meter is an average of 18% (including the incident meter in the studio), it is possible to red clip while the Green and blue are fine.

• Adobe 3.3 and camera profiles

  I'm under 3.3 on a MacPro.  I shoot with an olympus E-1.  When I go to the calibration of the camera only three options I have are ACR4.4, ACR 2.4 and standard Adobe.  In the book Kelby, the drop down shows many other options.  What I am doing wrong?

  Thanks in advance.

  These are the only profiles provided by Adobe for the E-1.

  Other profiles are available for most Canon and Nikon cameras. Go to the folder CameraProfiles to see cameras that Adobe provides additional profiles.

• Problems for CS4 Extended install Camera Raw 5.2

  I have a Photoshop CS4 not registered yet because I have to wait for my paper license transfer to be processed Adobe... now I'm standing before HUGE problems so I will try to describe them... I use a CANON 5 d MARK2 and it installed Adobe Camera Raw 5.0 can not read my RAW files, so I need to install Adobe Camera Raw 5.2 which I do manual... I did it like this:

  RELEASE of PHOTOSHOP CS4 and ADOBE BRIDGE

  I OPENED THE FILE TO DOWNLOAD

  THEN I SEE A WINDOW WITH 3 FOLDERS CONTAINING WIN64-CAMERA RAW-CAMERA PROFILES

  I CLICK CAMERA PROFILES

  THEN POPS UP A DIALOG BOX SAYING: SELECT A DESTINATION AND EXTRACT FILES

  I CLICK EXTRACT, AND THEN OPENS A NEW WINDOW OPEN FILE SECURITY WARNING I THE LANCE AND THEN OPENS ANOTHER WINDOW OF WELCOME TO PROFILES CAMERA INSTALLATION WIZARD I CLICK INSTALL AND THEN ALWAYS POPS UP AN ERROR MESSAGE WINDOW SAYING:

  ERROR OPENING FILE FOR WRITING:

  C DATA ADOBE CAMERA CAMERA RAW ADOBE STANDARD CANON EOS 1000 D ADOBE STANDARD PROFILES. DCP

  Click CANCEL TO STOP the INSTALLATION, so I have TO ABORT IT

  and when I go to C-PROGRAM FILES COMMON FILES ADOBE PLUG INS-CS4-FILE FORMATS and DOUBLE-CLICK on CS4 CAMERA RAW opens with the ERROR MESSAGE COULD NOT COMPLETE YOUR REQUEST BECAUSE IT is NOT THE RIGHT TYPE OF DOCUMENT...?

  I have absolutely no idea of what it could be and I bet that I did something wrong but have no idea what... after 3 days of pure stress I'm about to break and throw this product by my window - I'd appreciate more suggestions/help so I can solve this problem!

  Thank you

  MICHAEL STAMMBERGER

  Stammberger wrote:

  I use a CANON 5 d MARK2 and it installed Adobe Camera Raw 5.0 can not read my RAW files, so I need to install Adobe Camera Raw 5.2 which I do manual...

  First off, you should be downloading and installation of camera 5.7 Raw which is the latest version of Camera Raw for CS4. Secondly, why you declare that you have to manually install Camera Raw? Last point, you're messing around with "camera profiles" in your message that has ZERO to do with the plug in Camera Raw itself... the profiles are for DNG profiles in the camera calibration tab if you have not installed Camera Raw is questionable.

  To download the 5.7 version go HERE. There are instructions to manually install the profiles and the plug-in Camera Raw.