GDOI------GETVPN - GM of the router is not encrypted traffic

Similar Questions

• Laptop HP G70 connection to the router but not the internet

  I have a laptop HP G70 running windows 7, I got a new router installed. My computer to the router, but not to the internet links. I tried the software updates for my drivers running, doing all used to end router for example change etc channel/parameters/IP wifi. I tried to turn off the wireless, reset the router and re enabling it does not work.

  It will connect to the internet ethernet of nis.

  My laptop connects fine with other networks if it is not wireless.

  All other devices are connected to the router.

  Please help this is extremely frustrating.

  You are the very welcome.

  I compressed the file and downloaded on my Skydrive account, which I shared the link below.

  Download, unzip and run the file called sp54972.

  https://onedrive.live.com/redir?RESID=832F4957D2E51B93! 263 & authkey =! AEOhdjA3QVhETy0 & ithint = % 2czip

• HTTPS access to the router does not work with Firefox 33.0

  HTTPS access to the router Linksys wrt610n has worked so that Firefox 32.0.3 the dd - wrt software of this router is self-signed certificate with the public key RSA = 512 bits (Yes, it's too short today). From Firefox 33.0 and whose 34, 35, 36-access https does not work. It is desirable to restore https behavior as in Firefox 32.0.3 (with warning and ability to do security exception). Please see the attachment with a https query result in different versions of Firefox.
  Thank you.

  Hello, make suggestions to the https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1038487 help in your case?

• Laptop suddenly can't find any available (Wifi) network, but the router is not the problem.

  My laptop was working fine, until what I packed it inside my bag I always do and got chased home my MOM to my father's House; which is a few miles. I opened it upward, and he could not find any networks (wifi) available. I know that the problem could not be the router because everyone elses laptop in my work from home and because my laptop usually shows at least 4 or 5 other connections wifi available, and mine shows nothing at all. The problem is not the wifi switch is on. Help, please!

  Hi Dubist,
  You have a reason to think it might be spyware?

  It sounds more like material if it has just stopped working and there is no other issue.

  Here's what I would do to try to understand the issue.

  Type cmd into the search bar and press to enter. On the command line, type ping 127.0.0.1 and close to enter. You should get a response back as a result time. Something like that.
  Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes = 32 time<1ms ttl="">

  If you do not, close the window Device Manager and type in the search bar and look under network adapters. See if you have a wireless device it and make sure that there is no exclamation beside him points.

  If you have exclamation points or of any error, reinstall the driver. If there is no device listed, it could just be dead and you can watch that need to buy a new external wireless card.

  Tell us what you find and we can go from there. Matt
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• connected to the router but not on internet

  Hi guys... First sorry for my English. Since Sunday that I'm not being able to go on the internet, and I don't know what happened, dor I have nothing.

  I get the correct configuration IP form the router, I've seen with other portable router to register my PC connected, but nothing impossible to navigate. I tried also with static IP address.

  I try a lot of time, disistalled and reinstalled NIC Driver restard PC, router, reset the TCP/IP stack. I am not able to also connect to the router configuration page. If I try to go to 192.168.1.1 a reception "site online, but is not responding...". »

  If I Ping 192.168.1.1 I have recevive request timeout, if I try it with another PC works and go quickly online reaaly. But i have installed in my PC with Virtual BOX, a virtual machine with windows XP and I go online, I can connect to 192.168.1.1.

  I've also tried sfc/scannow, but nothing...

  What happened?... and what I can do?...

  GIO tanks

  You have McAfee? McAfee has been updated at the same time as the last batch of updates from Windows 7 and it seems to be the cause of this problem for most, if not all, users.

  See the communication from this "criticism" - McAfee

  Some customers may experience a loss of network connectivity and/or errors in McAfee Security Center after a recent update

  You should make the fix McAfee, if necessary. There are corresponding communications for their enterprise products.

  I had to run the removal of McAfee Development tool a few times before and it caused a problem with the license if the PC was not connected to the internet during the abduction. Due cat of McAfee support reset their files in order to allow the relocation-reactivation. Here is their link cat - McAfee - media contains the link to the cat

  I got McAfee, but the connection has started working again on its own so I thought I was clear of problems. However, when I checked it says he was doing routine checks the updates in vain when I told it to do a manually. So stick with McAfee you don't follow their procedure of fix would have upgraded my PC at risk by not updated and, like other McAfee ads have since explained, the application did not refer to its database of threats correctly [and this could explain part of the variability of the symptoms of failure but all involved loss of internet connection]. Actually, I removed McAfee then installed Microsoft Security Essentials rather & my answer IE is faster I knew it [even though I had the Add-ons McAfee disabled for centuries].

  - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  If you do not have McAfee then Windows update than kb2705219 can also be a cause as the uninstall that appeared to solve the problem for some users [but I'm not particularly convinced by this]. To uninstall an update - control panel, programs & features, [left side of the window] see installed updates. Wait until the system has finished the research for the list of updates. Select update required, then right click and Uninstall.

• HP 4500 g510n-z-printer connected to the router but not responding do not

  Hello

  I got this printer (HP4500 G510n-z) for 3 years. This worked without any problem until I changed my router and installed a nas on the LAN Server.

  Now the printer is connected via WIFI to router and is perfectly installed on computers connected to the router. But it does not work. I used HP Print-Scan doctor and he finds the device, but it was not connected. I tried to connect to the printer IP of all computers, but I have not received any response (using ping, it doesn't have 75% of the package). On the router configuration page, the printer is connected to the usual IP and on connected computers the TCP - IP is configured correctly.

  I have tried everything and I managed only to reboot the router. But it did not last, each computer remains connected only until you restart the PC nex.

  Sorry if I'm not too clear, please don't exitate ask for more details. Thanks for your help!

  Replacement of your wireless router try now.

  http://www.HP.com/global/au/en/wireless/reconfiguring-system-Help3.html

• Wusb300n connects to the router, but not to the Internet

  Recently I have formatted my hard drive and reinstalled Windows XP Home Edition. Initially, wireless has functioned well. Now he works briefly then stops. The router works fine (another I have it right now). The strange thing is that the utility monitor wireless network which is installed with the drivers for the USB wireless network card says that I'm connected to the network, shows the correct information, and shows even the networks belonging to the neighbors. Everything looks OK. But there is no connection to the Internet and I can't share files with my other computer. What is going on?!

  Another detail: it works for a while at first, allowing me to connect to the other computer on the network and browse the Web, but then it stops without any indication that something is wrong.

  Help!

  Here is how I solved this problem. I found using the Troubleshoot utility of connection IE 8.0 security protocol used by my wireless router was different from the one I had chosen when I set up the connection (WPA or WEP or somesuch) wireless network. By matching them up, I avoided having then off the connection behavior.

  In addition, it cannot help I installed the wireless card until I installed the drivers of general network for the computer. By removing the two and their resettlement in the proper order (second wireless card) I think I contributed something to address the issue.

• Configuration of the router to allow VPN traffic through

  I would like to ask for assistance with a specific configuration to allow VPN traffic through a router from 1721.

  The network configuration is the following:

  Internet - Cisco 1721 - Cisco PIX 506th - LAN

  Remote clients connect from the internet by using the Cisco VPN client. The 1721 should just pass the packets through to the PIX, which is 192.168.0.2. Inside of the interface of the router is 192.168.0.1.

  The pix was originally configured with a public ip address and has been tested to work well to authenticate VPN connections and passing traffic in the local network. Then, the external ip address was changed to 192.168.0.2 and the router behind.

  The 1721 is configured with an ADSL connection, with fall-over automatic for an asynchronous connection. This configuration does not work well, and in the local network, users have normal internet access. I added lists of access for udp, esp and the traffic of the ahp.

  Cisco VPN clients receive an error indicating that the remote control is not responding.

  I have attached the router for reference, and any help would be greatly apreciated.

  Manual.

  Brian

  For VPN clients reach the PIX to complete their VPN the PIX needs to an address that is accessible from the outside where the customers are. When the PIX was a public address was obviously easy for guests to reach the PIX. When you give the PIX one address private, then he must make a translation. And this becomes a problem if the translation is dynamic.

  You have provided a static translation that is what is needed. But you have restricted the TCP 3389. I don't know why you restricted it in this way. What is supposed to happen for ISAKMP and ESP, AHP traffic? How is it to be translated?

  If there is not a static translation for ISAKMP traffic, ESP and AHP so clients don't know how to reach the server. Which brings me to the question of what the address is configured in the client to the server?

  HTH

  Rick

• Equium A60-181: how to connect to the router belkin wireless encrypted?

  The title says everything, how can I connect this laptop to my network with 128-bit encrypted signal. The router that I m trying to connect to is a belkin and connected without any problem before encryption. So please help me because I want to use my laptop again with the guarantee of the encrypted signal thank you.

  Hello Dean

  If your laptop can see your WLAN, it must be a problem with the network settings. In my view, you must configure the router to the factory settings and try to establish the connection without any network key.

  If it works well, you can then configure the network to be sure.

• Problem with VPN. Router is not encrypted but decrypts

  Hello, I have a problem in my IPSec tunnel. One of the routers (Cisco 861) is not encrypt the packets but decrypts those incoming from the remote peer (RV042). In the access list for the wan interface I deny traffic between subnets and vpn access list, I authorize the traffic. Could someone give me a help or advice. Thank you.

  Hello

  The problem is with the list of access-102.  This is your NAT access list.  You see that you allow the 172.16.2.0 at all until you deny, so all traffic is reflected on your public IP address before you try to go through the VPN.  You always want to DENY traffic before making any permit in an access list because they treat up and down on the first game.

  Try the following commands:

  no nat ip inside the source list 102 interface FastEthernet4 overload

  no access list 102

  access-list 102 deny ip 172.26.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.26.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 102 permit ip 172.26.2.0 0.0.0.255 any

  overload of IP nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet4

• VPN; list of access on the external interface allowing encrypted traffic

  Hi, I have a question about the access list on the external interface of a router 836. We have several routers on our clients site, some are lan2lan, some are client2router vpn.

  My question is; Why should I explicitly put the ip addresses of the client vpn or tunnel lan to the access list. Because the encrypted traffic to already allowing ESPs & isakmp.

  The access list is set to the outgoing interface with: ip access-group 102 to

  Note access-list 102 incoming Internet via ATM0.1

  Note access-list 102 permit IP VPN range

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.123.32.0 0.0.0.255 192.123.33.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 102 permit ip 14.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 102 permit esp a whole

  Note access-list 102 Open VPN Ports and other

  access-list 102 permit udp any host x.x.x.x eq isakmp newspaper

  I have to explicitly allow 192.123.32.0 (range of lan on the other side) & 14.1.1.0 (range of vpn client) because if I'm not I won't be able to reach the network.

  The vpn connection is not the problem, all traffic going through it.

  As far as I know, allowing ESPs & isakmp should be sufficient.

  Can anyone clarify this for me please?

  TNX

  Sebastian

  This has been previously answered on this forum. See http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40.ee9f970/0#selected_message for more details.

• Suddenly our router keeps losing the internet.   The representative of the Cox says that IPV6 on the router is not compatible with the Cisco modem.   I'm turning it off?   Who is?   All started 3 days ago.   Have to reboot AirPort Extreme

  Suddenly Tuesday, our wifi stopped working.   Cox can not see anything on their end.   So far, we had to restart 5 times.   I finally realized that it is not the modem (Cisco), but our AirPort Extreme.   That's all that needs to be restarted.   I talked to a technician that I got to know, and she said that this week this problem started occurring with customers who have extremes of the airport.   Something about the airport in IPV6 and this is not compatible.   Before systems were PVI until the numbers came out (?)   In any case, she said Cox could not fix this, that I needed to talk to Apple to see if I could disable IPV6, at least for now.   I think I see how to do this, but does it make sense to anyone?   We have a new modem, installed in January, Cisco DPQ3212, good speeds, no issues whatsoever until this week.   There are also 2 other friends here (Scottsdale, Cox) with extremes of the airport.   Any suggestions?

  Cox has made a number of recent changes to their service, and they are trying to integrate IPv6 technology into their signals. They have not fully implemented the changes that must be made, and not commit to a date where things will be fully installed.

  Everything was fine until Cox implements these recent changes, and now Cox is blaming the problem on Apple. Apple has a different answer, as you can imagine. It is typical among manufacturers... blame the other guy.

  Apple routers are picking up some of the information they need to work with IPv6 and Cox, but since Cox has not completed the process, you'll probably best results trying to not use IPv6 with the airport router at all until you receive word of Cox that their systems are ready.

  The bottom line to this problem can be resolved by asking "What has changed".  The answer is Cox has changed.

  Configure your router to the airport most convenient to use IPv6 local link parameters only for now, to see if this will help.  You will not be able to realize all the benefits of IPv6 at the moment, but I hope that things will improve.

  

• For two days, unable to get maps of Google with Firefox. The page opens, but the route is not available. With Safari, no problem.

  For two days, unable to Google Maps works with Firefox. The page opens but no answer to my questions. A message says "loading... Lai is too long? Look at troubleshooting guide or simplified HTML version. »
  No problem with Safari.

  URL of affected sites

  http://maps.Google.fr/

  I had the same problem. Reset the browser.startup.homepage_override.mstone in all: config. The problem is corrected.

• ASR vs router ISR for encrypted traffic

  I'm looking for a router that can handle up to 1 Gbps of traffic encrypted through a GRE over IPSec connection.  We currently use a 2951-SEC/K9, who overcomes to 80 MB/s @ 70% of the CPU.  I've been watching 3945 SRI but question if an ASR 1001-X would be a better choice for this project.  Someone saw on routers ISR vs ASR?   3945 do has the same bandwidth encrypted cap that the 2951 have?

  Hello

  I can't serve you with measures or similar at the moment.
  But I did intensive tests in the past with SRI and ASR with crypto.

  From my experience, I can tell you that ASR is the choice much better if it's crypto and QoS, etc.. The ASR have pretty good cryptographic chips on board, and you just need to allow their (SEC/K9).

  I did not use ASR 1006 1001-X remote ASR, but only with the first ESP shipped and I could easily encrypt 1 Gbps. ASR 1001-X has an ESP much more sharp with up to 20Gbps troughput, and up to 8 Gbps of crypto (activated license). If you must certainly not run into problems with this unit.

  It is also much more future-proof since you can concede more performance. So if you can afford an ASR, I'd certainly go for it.

  Kind regards
  Markus

• What does this mean and how to fix: the router address you entered is not compatible with your WAN IP address.

  I connect to an access provider via Airport Extreme, which is extended through two Airport Express.  When I try to edit anything in one of these devices, even a name, I get this message: "you have entered the address of the router is not compatible with your WAN IP address.  My connection seems to work, but there is clearly something wrong with her.  The Express has no DNS and will not update without the same message.  I have no idea what this is all about and will greatly appreciate the ideas.

  This means that WAN Setup does not or does not install across the network.

  The best way to solve this problem is beginning on...

  Reset all three at the factory and reconfigure each in turn. Do the extreme first and make sure it works... Then add the express.

  If you need help with that we will need to know which modem or modem router to your ISP gave you and possibly the type of services to wide band... and who is the provider.

  Give us screenshots of each installer as you do.