Intel CPU T5450 is similar to CPU T5500

Similar Questions

• ESX 3.5 does not start with two intel cpu on an ibm HS21 blade 5420

  I have 4 ibm HS21 blades that I bought recently and ESX 3.5 does not start on them if I have both CPU intel 5420 installed. It will start if I remove one of the CPU. This also occurs if I try ESXi.

  I have two blades I bought 8 months ago that work well with both CPU is installed. Blade models are very similar, "old" is hs21-8853a1c new knives is hs21-8853g3u.

  I have updated the bios and the controllers. At this point, I shot two blades of the additional processor so that I can use them but I would really like to put back them.

  Any thoughts?

  David,

  Welcome to the forums!

  Could check you if two microprocessors are executing a different step? If so, then the debate may be relevant here .

  Sanjana-

• Satellite A110-274 supports one Intel CPU T2050?

  Hi guys can tell me if the A110-274 supports a duo T2050 processor anyone or not...

  Thank you very much

  Satellite A110 supports up to a processor Intel Core Duo 2.16 GHz with 2 MB of Cache L2 and FSB 667 MHz.

  But in your case, I would not change the CPU because it costs a lot to and you get much more performance.

  Here is an article on the CPU upgrade:
  http://195.182.196.33/KB0/FAQ7A01ZW0007R01.htm

• Aurora R4 - replacement with newer 4820 K K 4930 Intel CPU or CPU X 4960

  Can an existing Aurora R4 (which was delivered with an Intel 3820, 3930K or CPU X 3960) be user upgraded to a new Intel Intel 4820 K K 4930 or CPU X 4960 without replacing the motherboard with a new revision of this forum?

  If Yes, what version of BIOS is necessary?

  Why on the Aurora R4 the BIOS download page is not listed?

  Hello Pdschweitzer!

  Yes, you can upgrade the processor of Intel 4820 K 4930 K or CPU X 4960 without replacing the motherboard, the only thing that you have make sure you, is that you have a recent version of the BIOS.

  They remove drivers and downloads, but you can find it if you type in the search bar Aurora R4 BIOS, I would recommend you to Flash the BIOS A07 since they are testing the A09 version

  Here you can find the link to download.

• Windows 7 & Skylake Intel CPU support

  I'm looking to build a new rig and want to continue using my Windows 7 existing license until the end of LIFE product in 2020 (or until 10 is radically improved or something else comes out).

  By watching Z170 or x 99 platforms... leaning towards Z170 to allow future events.
  During my research, I discovered the gen 6 new Intel processors Skylake will receive only Win7/updates on day of support until 2017.  I've also heard the Skylakes will be targeted and forced to upgrade to Win10 via Windows Update.  Are one of these true?
  What are the other "newer" Intel processors (4th/5th gen i3/i5/i7, Haswell, etc.) that are currently planned for Win7 support 2020 pursuit?

  In addition to my questions, please provide any additional info, you can share this topic.  Thanks for your help!

  Actually in charge in what concerns the ends win-7 2020 and I guess, according to many users, it will be expanded as x - p,.

  However, Intel is :), there is a difference of 18 months

  Not to mention that it's only in what concerns the new drivers of your cpu or the motherboard will not stop working :D

  Support, however, depends on what kind of problems you might face = probably none is I think it's just a tactic for fear of upgrade.

  M$ is desperate to make everybody buy in this stupid upgrade and eat it too many licenses of win 7 because they can

  There is no real reason 7 and 10 cannot co-exist unless M$ wants no more than 7 on the market.

• Good Intel CPU installed?

  I recently took delivery of the new desktop XPS 8900. I ordered Intel Core i6700 processor (8 M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz). However when I checked the information on the system installed on the desktop CPU shows Intel Core i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40 GHz.  Performance test indicated qualified Max speed 3.40 GHz and current flow 3.41 GHz. correct processor has been installed? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you

  http://Ark.Intel.com/products/88196/Intel-Core-I7-6700-processor-8M-cache-up-to-4_00-GHz

  Yes, that's the correct processor. the 6700 has speed of 3.4 Ghz and Turbo to 4.0.

  You can install HWiNFO64 and you see all the details of the processor, the speed of each carrot and temp of each nucleus during the performance test.

• Mode of Intel not giving expected performance - vSPhere 5.5 - Intel CPU E5-2699

  Hello

  We have a few hosts Dell R730 with 2xE5-2699 CPU in them. Basic frequency is 2.3 Ghz and Max Turbo 3.6 according to the specifications.

  Intel's mode is activated and we are running 1 VM on those hosts with 4vCPU, the virtual machine is configured as sensitive to high latency. When carrots are maxxing out on the virtual machine, we see Mhz max 11250 use which is 2812, 5 Mhz by heart, which is 2.8 Ghz. I expect to see 3.6 Ghz, because the host is only 1VM running with 4cores and the host is 18Cores (per CPU).

  Someone got experience with this CPU and turbo boost? Is there maybe some configurations we miss them?

  Concerning

  Jonas

  You can find these multiplier cpu-datasheet. Calculate you the frequency as for load of 2 strands:

  base_frequency_ [GHz] + (multiplier * bus_clock_ [GHz]) = 2.3 + (13 * 0.1) = 3.6 GHz

  For 1 or 2 basic load, the multiplier is 13 (that strain begins with support for 18 all the kernels, then 17, 16, 15, etc., up to simple core). In your case, VM has now 4 vCPU. It is expected to use multiplier 10 and get 3.3 GHz, but no! 5 multiplier is used. Why? Because of the feature called 'load thermal balancing': ESXi "turns" that 4vCPU the load on all pCPUs/pCores, so that all pCPUs/pCores are moderately loaded (so your multiplier 5 is used). Every modern operating system is present (even Windows). Otherwise, a part of CPU chip would be extremely hot, while other parts were cold.

  If you had installed Windows directly on the physical machine, you can stop using "processor affinity". You can probably do it in ESXi also, but I DON'T recommend it, unless you are ready to burn/wreck your Jepp. If only 2 of 18 pCores (on each pCPU) are 100% and remaining close to 0%, heat stress on carrots loaded and no charge limit is extremely high. This could really insist pCPU up leading to physical damage (even with very good cooling), if you run it any longer...

• vMotion compatibility Intel CPU

  Hi all

  I'm making reference to this document: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1991

  Requirements of VMotion CPU compatibility for Intel processors

  We have four servers BL460c G1 (Xeon 54xx CPU). I want to buy two new servers to replace 2 we have in an offbeat upgrade. The new servers are BL460c G7 (Xeon 56xx CPU).

  In the above document, our current processor is part of Group C. Our new servers fit into Group E. There are instructions of compatibility vmotion for vMotioning fast between the groups C - D and D-e... but I need to know if I can vMotion the c.-e. group. Is this possible, or what I can not vmotion?

  Thanks for your help!

  The VMware Compatibility Guide for your research material and click on the CPU model. This will open a web page that shows all modes of EVC supported CPU.

  André

• ESXi 5.1 & 5.0 - ordinal number for active Hyperthreaded Intel CPU Core

  OK, I think I asked this before, maybe, about 2 years ago but I don't remember what the answer was.

  So here's the question...

  In a host of CPU 2 where each CPU has 4 cores for a total of 8 cores BUT with technology HT (Hyperthreading) enabled, for a total of 16 cores, how can you determine what core HT is and what the ordinal position?

  I thought that the ordinal went like this...

  CPU 0:

  0 base = true core

  Base 1 = Core HT

  Base 2 = real basic

  Basic 3 = Core HT

  4 basic = true core

  5 core = Core HT

  6 basic = true core

  7 core = Core HT

  CPU 1:

  8 basic = true core

  9 core = Core HT

  Base 10 = true core

  11 core = Core HT

  12 basic = true core

  13 core = Core HT

  14 basic = true core

  15 core = Core HT

  Anyone have any ideas?

  Thank you

  See;

  http://pubs.VMware.com/vSphere-50/topic/com.VMware.vSphere.resmgmt.doc_50/GUID-3362A2E9-AB03-4C10-B9A1-3E6CA78D399B.html

  Hyperthreading and ESXi hosts

  A host that is enabled for hyperthreading should behave similarly to a host without hyperthreading. You may need to take into consideration certain factors if you enable hyperthreading, however.

  ESXi hosts manage time processor intelligently in order to ensure that the load is distributed smoothly on CPU cores in the system. Logical processors on the same core have consecutive numbers of CPU, so that CPU 0 and 1 are on the first core set, CPU 2 and 3 are on the kernel, second and so on. Virtual machines are preferentially on demand on two different cores rather than on the two logical processors on the same kernel.

  If there is no work for a logical processor, it is put in a stopped state, which releases its resources to enforcement and allows the virtual machine running on the other logical processor on the same kernel to use the resources of the full implementation of the core. VMware scheduler correctly represents for this downtime and the load of a virtual machine running with all the resources of a core more than a virtual machine running on a basis of one half. This approach to processor management ensures that the server does not violate standard ESXi resources allocation rules.

  Consider that your management needs before you enable the processor affinity on servers using hyperthreading. For example, if you link a virtual machine of high priority to the CPU 0 and one other high-priority CPU 1, two virtual machines virtual machine must share the same physical core. In this case, it may be impossible to respect requests for resources of these virtual machines. Ensure that all custom settings affinity of meaning for a hyperthreading system.

• AMD Intel CPU su Virtualizzare platform

  Ciao a tutti. HO a grosso dubbio. Abbiamo una macchina con tecnologia AMD Opteron.

  Since ' discovered application che deve run no e sopra che abbiamo' disabilitando of aware e Reed NUMA NUMA non ha ottime performance above us is virtualizzando it Server e installando poi una vm, sia possibile UN processore emulare a tecnologia Intel (sul quale application funziona bene).

  Secondo voi Può ' funzionare o alla fine Reed is nelle options c'e 'the opportunity' di change the configurations of CPU/MMU virtualization, in concreto continued ad utilizzare solo istruzioni AMD?

  Grazie

  Quindi non e' pensabile che virtualizzando server, indipendentemente dalla cpu used, performance of esx riesca a sfruttare NUMA (che abbiamo disabilitato adesso) e ad avere migliori, giusto? Perche' in ogni caso the vm would be lato cpu come quella fisica e abilitato NUMA would.

  No e che uses NUMA o meno, the hypervisor ESXi passed the che trova sulla cpu alle istruzioni varies virtual machines. SE numa e acceso lo trovera VM (to lo supporta) e lo usera, altrimenti not. Reach: Di 'emulazione"VMware no fa cpu.

  COSA intendi con quale used cars?

  Che best-known nella VM operating system. My credo sia indifferent dear vista risposta buttons.

  Con NUMA disabilitato the ha application performance superiori del 50%. Per capirci una gira of query in 3 minuti instead ' 6.

  Ah, my allora è una difference tra I had, avevo capito che dai test pit emerso it contrast. Sorry, leave spento NUMA Allora e siete a posto not? This sound terms come dicevo "particolari" in cui Può numa actually capitare non solo che non venga usato my crei anzi problemi.

  Riguardo numa, tecnologia viene sfruttata appieno questa e ram is TR ha possibility di parallelizzare molto I put on hurt alle CPU, altrimenti he suo e really nullo or almost matched. TI consiglio di leggerti como ESXi alloca uso della memoria alle Jessica VM quando e present NUMA:

  http://blogs.VMware.com/vSphere/2012/02/vspherenuma-LoadBalancing.html

  Ciao,.

  Luca.

• HP Pavilion 15 laptop: Uptime Intel CPU does not go to zero

  Hello

  Is it normal that my CPU uptime does not go to zero?

  When I quit the pc everythings is now closed (now because before I have a problem http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebook-Boot-and-Lockup/hp-doesn-t-shut-down-or-hibernate-HP-Pavilion-... but now it is solved thanks @DavidPK for his help) when I start the pc is wake up normally but if I go to the Task Manager, I see the uptime of cpu does not go to zero. to do this, go to zero, the only way is to restart the computer after you watch...

  Is this a problem? If so can you help me?

  You can see my screenshoot

  

  Hello

  This is the normal case "quick start" is selected in the power options menu and there is really no problem with that. "

  You can always check that this is the case as follows.

  Open settings and select System.  Select food and sleep, and then click additional power settings - in the next window, click on "Choose what the power button" in the left pane.

  In the next window, click on "Change settings that are currently unavailable" (close), then Remove the check mark from the box against 'Turn on a quick start (recommended) '.  Click on the button Save the settings, and then close all open windows.

  Stop the notebook, then start it again and check the value of the CPU operating time.

  Personally, if it is not causing any trouble, I would turn on "quick start".

  Kind regards

  DP - K

• SpeedGrade - INTEL CPU is REQUIRED?

  Looking at the Adobe "needed here basic configuration http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativesuite/production/cs6/pdfs/adobe-mat item-performance-whitepap... .

  He suggests applications can run on a processor AMD EXCEPT Speedgrade? But I swear another place I saw that CC Speedgrade will run on AMD...

  I currently have an AMD Phenom II 6 core/6 wire and is considering an upgrade to a mother more robust (I want more memory USB 3 etc)... the CPU did a decent job for me, but I can go to a FX8350 if I stay with an AMD card... but there's the rub. That I should?

  I thought that EVERYTHING would be on an AMD processor, but I don't think?

  Adobe applications are always coded (unfortunately) to run better with CUDA OpenCl or which is which is used with AMD graphics cards. They normally work with them, but not as well as we can hope, and they do better with AMD cards than before.

  But I have not spoken with anyone running Sg on an AMD processor recently, so... I don't have a definitive answer.

  I would suggest asking this course on the Hardware forum...

  https://forums.Adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum

  Neil

• Doubt Intel cpu upgrade

  A friend gave me an intel i7 930 as a gift, would really like to replace it with the i3 in my hp probook 4530 s. Please it's okay? Or better build your desktop for it☺️

  Thanks, I guess but who will certainly give me the chance to build a desktop computer for the first time, so I need advice on equipment specifications

• I'm looking for on what was the original intel cpu in my recently bought elitebook 8560p

  I bought an EliteBook 8560p opportunity. How can I know what was the original intel i5. I think that it has been replaced with an i5 2540

  Guides Maintenance & Service-although it does not have the original processor in your model, it gives the different options.

  http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/manualsResults/?sp4ts.oid=5056949&spf_p.tpst=psiContentResults&spf_p.prp_psiContentResults=wsrp-navigationalState%3Daction%253Dmanualslist%257Ccontentid%253DService-and-maintenance%257Clang%253Den&javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken

• Satellite T130-11u with Intel CPU Q300 does not start

  Hello

  I installed a Q300 240 G in my T130 LU.
  It does not start.

  I tried to use the restore disks, everything went well.
  But it's boot after that... it's LAN check while the boot device is set to Q300.

  I tried with a Windows disc.
  It says that the disk is locked and I need to unlock it. (Messages are in French).

  I forgot something?

  Concerning

  Jean-Luc

  Automatic response...

  I managed to get to start.

  I had to put:
  "Exectute-disable bit capability" to [Disabled]
  "Control" mode SATA [compatibility]

  After that, I managed to install the system and start (most important) it.

  Once the system was working, I have reset these entries to the normal configuration without any adverse effect.

  Concerning

  Jean-Luc