SpeedGrade - INTEL CPU is REQUIRED?

Similar Questions

• Intel CPU T5450 is similar to CPU T5500

  Please let know us, as I just got a replacement for my previuos laptop that was a Satellite of Tosh with a processor intel T5500.
  My new laptop has a processor intel core 2 duo T5450 rather than an intel core 2 duo T5500 and I would like to know if the processor of intel lower (T5450) would be identical or similar and would not make much difference to the laptop operating speeds.

  Will there be a significant change in performance with the previous T5450 rather than CPU intel T5500?

  Hello

  Here is a detailed description of Intel:

  [Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile T5500 | http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9SH]

  [Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile Processor T5450 | http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sspec=sla4f]

  Both processors are very similar. All two supported the same speed but the T5500 requires less energy and creates less heat dissipation.

  But the difference is really minimal, and in my opinion a new processor would not increase the performance of your laptop.

• Number of CPU cores required (Virtual vs. physical) for video editing 4 K Prime Minister?

  Hi all.

  About to start my own business / video editing. I'm doing a customized version of PC. I am considering a motherboard very processor dual Xeon with maybe 64 GB of RAM and a certified Quadro 4 GB or 8 GB GPU. The 4 k I intend to work on commercials under 15 long minutes, will take place with an average of 3 video tracks and 2 audio tracks.

  When it comes to running Adobe Premier Pro 5.5 or 6 (for 4K editing video and rendering), I read that it is recommended to have 12 hearts in each of the two processors. (The PDF I read was an official guide of 2015 from Intel: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing ')

  Now, I wonder if this figure of 12 cores per processor is related to PHYSICAL cores, or ALL hearts including VIRTUAL cores (.. .If it is referred to all the hearts, so I just need to buy two 6 core processors, giving a total of 24 cores can be used.) Big price difference between a 6 core CPU and a 12 core...

  The Xeon series which will be compatible with my MB is the 2600 CPU of the E5 v3 family. Stories of advice or that popular horror...!

  Paul.

  guide intel suggests probably 12 real hearts, possibly the v3 of E5-2680. It would be double Xeon 24/48 virtual hearts.

  software Adobe does not need the features on the quadro, using the version of game/Office nvidia gtx can help save money.

  If you need 10 bit out for the color correction, view maps of mfg as blackmagic, aja and others may be a better option.

  have you already bought the motherboard?

  Hardware requirements may vary for different types of media and project as multi-cam configurations. codecs like h264/5 are very difficult for the processor process and the gpu should be handled, but first does not currently support gpu accelerated encoding/decoding. This is what can lead to dual xeons as intel recommends. Dual cpu also have large overhead, reducing their combined processing power. Another reason why intel may recommend the 12 core dual processor. If you use the less demanding codecs such as prores or dnxhr, UC must be as powerful, and can even be possible to use a single processor. Some people transcode their sequences of difficult codecs like h264/5 prores or dnxhr as a whole work rather than buy a more powerful system to manage h264/5 when editing.

  Hackers Page - Video Codecs

  Intel PDF: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing."

  It is important to note that software engineers need to write specific code to take advantage of some features like multiple nuclei (multithreading) and virtual cores (hyper-threading). Consumer applications such as Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects already take full advantage of these features.

  If you check that the tests carried out here: Tweakers Page - decide between one processor or dual CPU and read through the discussions here and other websites, you will find the results against this last sentence. software Adobe has long had problems fully multi-threads, the first is not as bad as some of the other adobe programs but can still have problems.

• vMotion compatibility Intel CPU

  Hi all

  I'm making reference to this document: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US & cmd = displayKC & externalId = 1991

  Requirements of VMotion CPU compatibility for Intel processors

  We have four servers BL460c G1 (Xeon 54xx CPU). I want to buy two new servers to replace 2 we have in an offbeat upgrade. The new servers are BL460c G7 (Xeon 56xx CPU).

  In the above document, our current processor is part of Group C. Our new servers fit into Group E. There are instructions of compatibility vmotion for vMotioning fast between the groups C - D and D-e... but I need to know if I can vMotion the c.-e. group. Is this possible, or what I can not vmotion?

  Thanks for your help!

  The VMware Compatibility Guide for your research material and click on the CPU model. This will open a web page that shows all modes of EVC supported CPU.

  André

• Satellite A110-274 supports one Intel CPU T2050?

  Hi guys can tell me if the A110-274 supports a duo T2050 processor anyone or not...

  Thank you very much

  Satellite A110 supports up to a processor Intel Core Duo 2.16 GHz with 2 MB of Cache L2 and FSB 667 MHz.

  But in your case, I would not change the CPU because it costs a lot to and you get much more performance.

  Here is an article on the CPU upgrade:
  http://195.182.196.33/KB0/FAQ7A01ZW0007R01.htm

• HP Compaq dx2300 format microtour CPU Upgrade requires the bios update

  Hey, my Hp compaq dx2300 format microtour came with a core2duo E4400 processor, I had an E8400 CPU because they share the same socket LGA compatible on the motherboard and it fits perfectly, only the pc does not start, then read around some sites say it is supported by my MSI motherboard A 0, 90, others only reported up to E6700 what I don't understand, is why it wouldn't work? I BIOS v1.14 (latest news on the list of dated drivers '2008'!) and can't seem to find a solution for this, please tell me what to do I don't want to be stuck with a CPU, I can't use cause it isn't a way to map mother read it, thanks in advance!

  Hello:

  Unfortunately, you're stuck with an E8400 which won't work in this PC.  See page 4.

  Here are links to the quickspecs for your model.

  http://h18000.www1.HP.com/products/QuickSpecs/12668_na/12668_na.PDF

  An E8400 processor will not work in any case with x chipset Intel 94 or 96 x chipset.

  In order to run an E8400 into a PC, there need an Intel 3 series chipset or 4 of the series.

  Of course a processor must adapt to an outlet, but is not the only criterion needed to make it work.

• Aurora R4 - replacement with newer 4820 K K 4930 Intel CPU or CPU X 4960

  Can an existing Aurora R4 (which was delivered with an Intel 3820, 3930K or CPU X 3960) be user upgraded to a new Intel Intel 4820 K K 4930 or CPU X 4960 without replacing the motherboard with a new revision of this forum?

  If Yes, what version of BIOS is necessary?

  Why on the Aurora R4 the BIOS download page is not listed?

  Hello Pdschweitzer!

  Yes, you can upgrade the processor of Intel 4820 K 4930 K or CPU X 4960 without replacing the motherboard, the only thing that you have make sure you, is that you have a recent version of the BIOS.

  They remove drivers and downloads, but you can find it if you type in the search bar Aurora R4 BIOS, I would recommend you to Flash the BIOS A07 since they are testing the A09 version

  Here you can find the link to download.

• Windows 7 & Skylake Intel CPU support

  I'm looking to build a new rig and want to continue using my Windows 7 existing license until the end of LIFE product in 2020 (or until 10 is radically improved or something else comes out).

  By watching Z170 or x 99 platforms... leaning towards Z170 to allow future events.
  During my research, I discovered the gen 6 new Intel processors Skylake will receive only Win7/updates on day of support until 2017.  I've also heard the Skylakes will be targeted and forced to upgrade to Win10 via Windows Update.  Are one of these true?
  What are the other "newer" Intel processors (4th/5th gen i3/i5/i7, Haswell, etc.) that are currently planned for Win7 support 2020 pursuit?

  In addition to my questions, please provide any additional info, you can share this topic.  Thanks for your help!

  Actually in charge in what concerns the ends win-7 2020 and I guess, according to many users, it will be expanded as x - p,.

  However, Intel is :), there is a difference of 18 months

  Not to mention that it's only in what concerns the new drivers of your cpu or the motherboard will not stop working :D

  Support, however, depends on what kind of problems you might face = probably none is I think it's just a tactic for fear of upgrade.

  M$ is desperate to make everybody buy in this stupid upgrade and eat it too many licenses of win 7 because they can

  There is no real reason 7 and 10 cannot co-exist unless M$ wants no more than 7 on the market.

• Good Intel CPU installed?

  I recently took delivery of the new desktop XPS 8900. I ordered Intel Core i6700 processor (8 M Cache, up to 4.0 GHz). However when I checked the information on the system installed on the desktop CPU shows Intel Core i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40 GHz.  Performance test indicated qualified Max speed 3.40 GHz and current flow 3.41 GHz. correct processor has been installed? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you

  http://Ark.Intel.com/products/88196/Intel-Core-I7-6700-processor-8M-cache-up-to-4_00-GHz

  Yes, that's the correct processor. the 6700 has speed of 3.4 Ghz and Turbo to 4.0.

  You can install HWiNFO64 and you see all the details of the processor, the speed of each carrot and temp of each nucleus during the performance test.

• Mode of Intel not giving expected performance - vSPhere 5.5 - Intel CPU E5-2699

  Hello

  We have a few hosts Dell R730 with 2xE5-2699 CPU in them. Basic frequency is 2.3 Ghz and Max Turbo 3.6 according to the specifications.

  Intel's mode is activated and we are running 1 VM on those hosts with 4vCPU, the virtual machine is configured as sensitive to high latency. When carrots are maxxing out on the virtual machine, we see Mhz max 11250 use which is 2812, 5 Mhz by heart, which is 2.8 Ghz. I expect to see 3.6 Ghz, because the host is only 1VM running with 4cores and the host is 18Cores (per CPU).

  Someone got experience with this CPU and turbo boost? Is there maybe some configurations we miss them?

  Concerning

  Jonas

  You can find these multiplier cpu-datasheet. Calculate you the frequency as for load of 2 strands:

  base_frequency_ [GHz] + (multiplier * bus_clock_ [GHz]) = 2.3 + (13 * 0.1) = 3.6 GHz

  For 1 or 2 basic load, the multiplier is 13 (that strain begins with support for 18 all the kernels, then 17, 16, 15, etc., up to simple core). In your case, VM has now 4 vCPU. It is expected to use multiplier 10 and get 3.3 GHz, but no! 5 multiplier is used. Why? Because of the feature called 'load thermal balancing': ESXi "turns" that 4vCPU the load on all pCPUs/pCores, so that all pCPUs/pCores are moderately loaded (so your multiplier 5 is used). Every modern operating system is present (even Windows). Otherwise, a part of CPU chip would be extremely hot, while other parts were cold.

  If you had installed Windows directly on the physical machine, you can stop using "processor affinity". You can probably do it in ESXi also, but I DON'T recommend it, unless you are ready to burn/wreck your Jepp. If only 2 of 18 pCores (on each pCPU) are 100% and remaining close to 0%, heat stress on carrots loaded and no charge limit is extremely high. This could really insist pCPU up leading to physical damage (even with very good cooling), if you run it any longer...

• AMD Intel CPU su Virtualizzare platform

  Ciao a tutti. HO a grosso dubbio. Abbiamo una macchina con tecnologia AMD Opteron.

  Since ' discovered application che deve run no e sopra che abbiamo' disabilitando of aware e Reed NUMA NUMA non ha ottime performance above us is virtualizzando it Server e installando poi una vm, sia possibile UN processore emulare a tecnologia Intel (sul quale application funziona bene).

  Secondo voi Può ' funzionare o alla fine Reed is nelle options c'e 'the opportunity' di change the configurations of CPU/MMU virtualization, in concreto continued ad utilizzare solo istruzioni AMD?

  Grazie

  Quindi non e' pensabile che virtualizzando server, indipendentemente dalla cpu used, performance of esx riesca a sfruttare NUMA (che abbiamo disabilitato adesso) e ad avere migliori, giusto? Perche' in ogni caso the vm would be lato cpu come quella fisica e abilitato NUMA would.

  No e che uses NUMA o meno, the hypervisor ESXi passed the che trova sulla cpu alle istruzioni varies virtual machines. SE numa e acceso lo trovera VM (to lo supporta) e lo usera, altrimenti not. Reach: Di 'emulazione"VMware no fa cpu.

  COSA intendi con quale used cars?

  Che best-known nella VM operating system. My credo sia indifferent dear vista risposta buttons.

  Con NUMA disabilitato the ha application performance superiori del 50%. Per capirci una gira of query in 3 minuti instead ' 6.

  Ah, my allora è una difference tra I had, avevo capito che dai test pit emerso it contrast. Sorry, leave spento NUMA Allora e siete a posto not? This sound terms come dicevo "particolari" in cui Può numa actually capitare non solo che non venga usato my crei anzi problemi.

  Riguardo numa, tecnologia viene sfruttata appieno questa e ram is TR ha possibility di parallelizzare molto I put on hurt alle CPU, altrimenti he suo e really nullo or almost matched. TI consiglio di leggerti como ESXi alloca uso della memoria alle Jessica VM quando e present NUMA:

  http://blogs.VMware.com/vSphere/2012/02/vspherenuma-LoadBalancing.html

  Ciao,.

  Luca.

• CPU Incompatible requirements with the virtual machine to the host.

  Hello

  I've been running ESX 4 with all my hosts upgraded to the last V hardware + tools for about a week now.  I don't know if its been always do this same thing because I'm not sure if I tried to migrate the server before after the upgrade, but I get the following error when trying to validate the hosts:

  Host CPU is Incompatible with the requirements of the CPUID machine 0x1 'ecx' register

  Bits of the host: 0000:0000:0000:1000:0010:0010:0000:0001

  Required: 1000:0000:0000:100 x: xx10:0x1x:xxx0:x 001

  Inconsistency detected for these features:

  It will start on any host without a complaint.  Running Server 2003 x 64 but it isn't the only x 64 server and there is no other problem with any of the other servers.  All hosts are x 64 servers HP compatible all identical, all purchased at the same time.

  Does anyone have an idea why its complaing?

  Thanks for the help

  This is a known issue, see this KB

  http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1011294

• ESX 3.5 does not start with two intel cpu on an ibm HS21 blade 5420

  I have 4 ibm HS21 blades that I bought recently and ESX 3.5 does not start on them if I have both CPU intel 5420 installed. It will start if I remove one of the CPU. This also occurs if I try ESXi.

  I have two blades I bought 8 months ago that work well with both CPU is installed. Blade models are very similar, "old" is hs21-8853a1c new knives is hs21-8853g3u.

  I have updated the bios and the controllers. At this point, I shot two blades of the additional processor so that I can use them but I would really like to put back them.

  Any thoughts?

  David,

  Welcome to the forums!

  Could check you if two microprocessors are executing a different step? If so, then the debate may be relevant here .

  Sanjana-

• Doubt Intel cpu upgrade

  A friend gave me an intel i7 930 as a gift, would really like to replace it with the i3 in my hp probook 4530 s. Please it's okay? Or better build your desktop for it☺️

  Thanks, I guess but who will certainly give me the chance to build a desktop computer for the first time, so I need advice on equipment specifications

• HP Pavilion 15 laptop: Uptime Intel CPU does not go to zero

  Hello

  Is it normal that my CPU uptime does not go to zero?

  When I quit the pc everythings is now closed (now because before I have a problem http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebook-Boot-and-Lockup/hp-doesn-t-shut-down-or-hibernate-HP-Pavilion-... but now it is solved thanks @DavidPK for his help) when I start the pc is wake up normally but if I go to the Task Manager, I see the uptime of cpu does not go to zero. to do this, go to zero, the only way is to restart the computer after you watch...

  Is this a problem? If so can you help me?

  You can see my screenshoot

  

  Hello

  This is the normal case "quick start" is selected in the power options menu and there is really no problem with that. "

  You can always check that this is the case as follows.

  Open settings and select System.  Select food and sleep, and then click additional power settings - in the next window, click on "Choose what the power button" in the left pane.

  In the next window, click on "Change settings that are currently unavailable" (close), then Remove the check mark from the box against 'Turn on a quick start (recommended) '.  Click on the button Save the settings, and then close all open windows.

  Stop the notebook, then start it again and check the value of the CPU operating time.

  Personally, if it is not causing any trouble, I would turn on "quick start".

  Kind regards

  DP - K