ISE 1.1.1 and debugging of LDAP

Similar Questions

• Xcode requires additional components to support running and debugging

  Hi all

  Today, I tried to start xcode. And he asks me "xcode requires additional components to support running and debugging. Select installation to add rewuired components.

  Is this ok? Or is my system caught by some funny virus / malware? Is - this caused by the upgrade of 10.11.3 at 10.11.4, is a new version of xcode?

  I have never seen before such a message.

  Greetings from the Germany

  Chris

  Hi Chris,

  The Add ab El Capitan as Xcode keine additional components.

  Hello alles on board!

  VIELLEICHT hilft Dir das yesterday ein wenig!

  https://youtu.be/K-rbWeSL0rY

  Gruss Ralf

• I need a version 3.0 - ish of Firefox which is used on a registration site the webmaster has not upgraded and debugged the site to be compatible with Firefox 4.

  The site

  https://Fourwinds.com/OCF/login.php

  only works with Firefox as browser. The webmaster does not have upgraded and debugging for use with Firefox 4. I'm hoping to find a copy of the version 3.0 - ish to be able to access this web site. Any suggestions?

  You can get Firefox 3.6 http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

  If it's just for a site, an alternative is to keep Firefox 4 but install the portable version of the earlier version of Firefox on your hard drive. You can get http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable - section version inherited at the bottom of this page contains links to older versions of Firefox.

• Why I get this cryptic error when I try to write and debug my Visual C++ project?

  I have some pretty serious problems related to Visual C++ and Visual Studio. Whenever I try to write and debug my project, I get the following error:

  

  Even just manually my building project of "Build > Build Solution" does not work. When I try to do, I get this error message instead:

  

  Honestly, I'm puzzled as to what could be causing this. If anyone can offer a possible solution to this question, it would be greatly appreciated.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• Eclipse and debug

  Hi all

  Sorry if this question was asked a million times. I'm new to programming Java, J2me and Blackberry... I started using the JDE 4.2.1 and decided to go the eclipse because of gaps JDE plugin (Code formatting was a biggie for me)... Eclipse on the other hand is a bear to get set up. My question has to do with the debugger and debugging.

  I put it in wrong place or debugging in Eclipse is miserable at best. From c# and Visual Studio, I'm used to throwing in the code debugger and showing you exactly where the unhandled exception or error is. With my current setup, I get a white screen in the Simulator with a vague description of the error. Can someone tell me please in the right direction... I really need more precise debugging.

  Thank you

  Paul

  If you get a white screen in the Simulator with a little message so it isn't properly in debug mode; Currently, he is running without debugging.

  If you want to debug, make sure that you select Debug or click the little bug to debug, when your in debug mode, when you get to an exception, it will show u the perspective to debug and you show the battery of the code, the exact line the error occurred, and a list of variables so that you can determine what is and is not null , check if something is a value expected (i.e. true/false etc.).

• Different behavior between cRIO 'Run as Startup' and debugging run

  Hello

  I have an application that does a lot of things, including playing a card NI 9213 Thermocouple, which lies on a connected to a RT cRIO target expansion chassis. The application is run on the target of RT. My problem is related to a behavioral difference between opening a connection to the channels of thermocouple in debug (by clicking on the arrow on the VI run) mode and the opening of the connection through a Build specification (by clicking Run as to start).

  During execution, the VI wrote in a text file on the hard drive of the cRIO. I enclose the text files, one of the debug mode and a Run as startup mode. I have only two thermocouples connected (ch1 and ch15). From the text file, you can see the connection opens without error in debug mode, but get an error in startup mode. I've also attached an extract showing the VI that I used for the test.

  A few notes:

  Nothing to do with the VI is changed between each type of race.

  The Build specification has the attached VI selected as startup VI, everything else is default

  Someone else out there has had a problem similar to this? I feel like the debug mode should act identically to the normal start deployment. Otherwise, what's the point?

  Thank you

  I solved the problem! Or at least worked around it by setting a different bug. This another bug happened to be the same words that were this bug, to run as a startup. I'll summarize for you:

• Simulator chips and debug BB10 Alpha

  Hello

  How to run BB10 Simulator alpha?

  Is it acquisitions have chips of debugging for Simulator?

  How to create debugging tokens?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Shubhangi

  The Simulator does not require a token of debugging.

  If you have an alpha of dev, you can use the Setup Wizard in Flash Builder to run you

  through creating a debug token:

  https://developer.BlackBerry.com/Air/beta/documentation/configure_development_environment_fb_2010839...

  If you aren't using Flash Builder but using instead command-line tools, use the command:

  BlackBerry debugtokenrequest - cskpass - keystore - storepass deviceId-

• App works perfectly well on the Simulator (using all modes) and peripheral when z10 in the communiqué of the execution and debug mode. But creates a 'SIGSEGV = 1 fltno = 11 ip = 781722ec error code' when the term is used.

  My application switches between two documents qml is a home page, and the other is actually a video player. Whenever I press the button to go to the video page, it crashes on my z10 and generates the error «terminated code SIGSEGV = 1 fltno = 11 781722ec = ip...» ". But on the Simulator, it works (without of course plays video). When I use the race version and the debug mode, it works perfectly on my z10.

  This problem occurs frequently when I add a new code element. First of all, it happened when I added a scrollview and container, and it's happening now again when a defined a struct in the header file.  It would be nice to ignore this problem? or y at - it some deeper underlying problem which is the cause

  Just tried, I received the SIGSEGV error too, it looks like parent to AbstractPane fixed it.

  void ApplicationUI::changeScene(const QString& newQmlFileName) {
      // Create root object for the UI
      QmlDocument *qml = QmlDocument::create("asset:///" + newQmlFileName).parent(this);
      qml->setContextProperty("_app", this);
      AbstractPane *root = qml->createRootObject();
      root->setParent(this);
  
      // Set created root object as the application scene
      Application::instance()->setScene(root);
  }
  

  My test project is also attached to this message.

• Tokens signature and debugging code

  I worked on an application using Cascades. I signed the app and it loaded on my Z10 and it works very well. If I then delete the token of debugging on the phone, the application runs is no longer.

  I thought that the debugging tokens were only necessary to run unsigned applications.

  What should I do to get the application to run without a token of debugging on the phone?

  Start by importing a signed Release Build (file > export and then BlackBerry > Release Build)...

  Then in Explorer under BAR packages, right-click on your .bar file and choose BlackBerry tools > install

• Tokens signature and debug with multiple machines

  There has been various issues and discussions on the backup for signing keys.  This thread says you can save your P12, CSK and DB files and then use them on another computer if your original dev machine never dies.  But I'm confused about how actually to 'install' these files to a new machine (with Flash Builder).  Does anyone have this done successfully?

  I have a second machine where I'm trying to restore my certificates saved (as a test).  I pulled FB on my P12 file, but I don't see anywhere to point to my a CSK or DB files.  The 'power of signature of register with RIM' command looks like that it just creates a new CSK, which broke app update.

  Registration also requires a file of the LSB, and those who are not supposed to be reusable.  The only way I know to get another file CSJ is to complete the shape of the RIM to request a whole new signing key.  But still, I don't want a new key signature...  I also wonder if it would be 'disable' the possibility of signing of my original machine - that is to say, each provider may have only one machine registered for signature at a time?

  A related question: has any who successfully put in place several machines dev (do not sign machines) with chips of work debugging?  FB doesn't let me create a debugging token until it is registered with signing authority, which once again the SJC prescription problem I mentioned above.  And it wont let me point to an existing BAR token I created on a different machine - even if the RIM docs say "you can distribute the debugging tokens you create for developers."

  So, anyone who has ha the chance with this kind of dev multi-machine configurations?  Details on how to do it?

  Thanks in advance!

  -Peter

  The steps to backup and restore your BlackBerry Code signing keys can be found here.

  Backup and restore BlackBerry Code signing keys

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/testing-and-deployment/backup-and-restore-BlackBerry-code-SIG...

  ytpete wrote

  A related question: has any who successfully put in place several machines dev (do not sign machines) with work debugging FB chips won't let me create a token to debug up to what he is registered with signing authority, that has once again the problem of limitation of CSJ I mentioned above.  And it wont let me point to an existing BAR token I created on a different machine - even if the RIM docs say "you can distribute the debugging tokens you create for developers."

  There was a problem with the BlackBerry Tablet SDK where the debugging token button import has been disabled until you have saved the code signing key.  This problem has been fixed in the latest version.  You can now import a token of debugging without keys of your choice.

• Deployment of ISE in network routing and Vlan

  Hello world

  New bee to ISE. I want to help/suggestions on how to deploy ise in my network or comment if my plan is working

  Machines to ISE, Servers (ALL) and Corporate (Dot1x and field) in vlan 10

  Comments should be in the vlan separate 20

  By default that all switch ports must be in the vlan 30 having nothing but only to DHCP.

  Each endpoint must come through vlan30 and then pushed to vlan respective IE 10 if corp (Dot1x) PC and comments vlan 20 if mab and do not appear in the endpoints.

  What is a successful deployment?

  Secondly the fact inter - vlan routing is required in this scenario for the endpoints to be controlled properly.

  ISE are able to communicate and of endpoints that are not in the VLAN of the police.

  Hello

  Deployment of the ISE requires a lot of consideration in many aspects. Suggest you read the cisco documentation carefully to become familiar.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/solutions/enterprise/security/T...

  Node ISE Cisco plays many roles; Admin, monitor & Service policy. The crux of the political service (PSN) is one who plays the role of RADIUS (RADIUS of tip to be precise) server to handle requests from the AAA.

  For authentication dot1x internal hosts, you can have a PSN ISE in-house LAN (VLAN even as servers) or users. Whereas, for wireless clients, you can use a dedicated NHP or share the PSN according to safety requirements.

  See you soon,.

  Vidy

  Please don't forget to rate this post so useful.

• ISE MAC movement move and host of Cisco

  Hello

  I read that SNMPTraps should not be sent to ISE using probe RADIUS, because it will trigger only a SNMPQuery duplicate. If so, how do you support a use case by which a device can withdraw the authorization of a switch port and successfully allow on a different port. It is one of the following exclusion of others?

  1 authentication allowed mac-passage

  2. analysis of IP device

  3. change notification-mac address table, notification of mac address table mac-move, trap snmp-server (global configuration) and snmp trap mac-notification (configuration interface)

  I understand that for a device behind a non-cisco IP, CDP or LLDP logoff phone or Proxy EAPOL will inform the switch.

  Thank you

  move to the Mac permits is the solution.

• ACS 5.2 - authentication user 802. 1 x and MSCHAPv2 using LDAP Source identity

  Hello community,

  I use the ACS 5.2 as the solution of authentication in my network. I configured two situations: access with network access policies and peripheral Administration.

  Currently, I have a few configured devices: 1 ASA (using RADIUS), WLC-5508 (using RADIUS) 1, 1 2960 S (with GANYMEDE +). And I set up an external identity store, using LDAP (I can see and select all groups without problem).

  Everything works fine. My next step was to configure users to use 802. 1 x to authenticate using ACS with my LDAP database.

  Assuming that all configurations are correct on all computers (when I use an internal database works very well), these are the following newspapers/configurations in the ACS:

  

  

  

  

  At this point, we can see the error:

  22043 current identity store does not support the authentication method; He jumps.

  Header 1

  Request for access received RADIUS 11001 11017 RADIUS creates a new session Assess Service selection strategy 15004 Matched rule Access Service - access Police selected 15012 11507 extract EAP-response/identity 12500 prepared EAP-request with EAP - TLS with challenge 11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access Request for access received RADIUS 11001 11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session 12301 extract EAP-response/NAK asking instead to use PEAP 12300 prepared EAP-request with PEAP with challenge 11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access Request for access received RADIUS 11001 11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session 12302 extracted EAP-response containing PEAP challenge-response and accepting as negotiated PEAP 12318 has successfully PEAP version 0 12800 first extract TLS record; TLS handshake has begun. 12805 extracted TLS ClientHello message. 12806 prepared TLS ServerHello message. 12807 prepared the TLS certificate message. 12810 prepared TLS ServerDone message. prepared 12305 EAP-request another challenge PEAP 11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access Request for access received RADIUS 11001 11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session 12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response 12318 has successfully PEAP version 0 12812 extracted TLS ClientKeyExchange message. 12804 message retrieved over TLS. 12801 prepared TLS ChangeCipherSpec message. 12802 prepared TLS completed message. 12816 TLS handshake succeeded.

  12310 full handshake PEAP completed successfully
  prepared 12305 EAP-request another challenge PEAP
  11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access
  Request for access received RADIUS 11001
  11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session
  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

  12313 PEAP inner method started

  11521 prepared EAP-request/identity for inner EAP method
  prepared 12305 EAP-request another challenge PEAP
  11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access
  Request for access received RADIUS 11001
  11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session
  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response
  11522 extract EAP-Response/Identity for EAP method internal
  11806 prepared EAP-internal method call offering EAP-MSCHAP VERSION challenge
  prepared 12305 EAP-request another challenge PEAP
  11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access
  Request for access received RADIUS 11001
  11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session
  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response
  11808 extracted EAP-response containing EAP - MSCHAP VERSION challenge response to the internal method and accepting of EAP - MSCHAP VERSION such as negotiated

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15013 selected identity store-

  22043 current identity store does not support the authentication method; He jumps.
  22056 object was not found in the identity of the point of sale.
  22058 advanced option that is configured for a unknown user is used.
  22061 the option 'Refuse' Advanced is set in the case of a request for authentication has failed.
  11815 inner EAP-MSCHAP VERSION authentication failed
  11520 prepared EAP-failure of the inner EAP method
  22028 authentication failed and advanced options are ignored.
  prepared 12305 EAP-request another challenge PEAP
  11006 returned Challenge RADIUS access
  Request for access received RADIUS 11001
  11018 RADIUS re - use an existing session
  12304 extract EAP-response containing PEAP stimulus / response

  Authentication PEAP 12307 failure

  11504 prepared EAP-failure

  11003 returned RADIUS Access-Reject

  So, what can be the cause? Compatibility with LDAP?

  Plinio,

  Watch this doc,

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.2/user/guide/eap_pap_phase.html#wp1014889

  There is a table which indicates that LDAP is not a database compatible with our EAP type (MSCHAP VERSION-2).

  LDAP, you can use with TLS, PEAP-GTC, and EAP-FAST-GTC.

  TLS uses certificates on both sides, suplicant, and server authentication server.

  * GCT if I'm not mistaken is a WBS system to use with the EAP protocol.

  Authentication Protocol EAP compatibility of database user and table B-5

  Identity store	EAP - MD5	EAP-TLS 1	PEAP-EAP-MSCHAPv2	EAP-FAST MSCHAPv2	PEAP-GTC	EAP-FAST-GTC
  ACS	Yes	Yes2	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
  Windows AD	NO.	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
  LDAP	NO.	Yes	NO.	NO.	Yes	Yes
  RSA identity store	NO.	NO.	NO.	NO.	Yes	Yes

  Identity of DEPARTMENT store

  NO.

  NO.

  NO.

  NO.

  Yes

  Yes

• ISE 1.1.4 and AD 2012 Windows

  Hello.

  I'm trying raise 802. 1 x authentication certificate and running. I want to use the user and computer certificate.

  On v1.1.4 "Vanilla", I get an error message with the user certificate. After some reading, it appears support for 2012 AD was added in patch 2.

  So I installed the patch 4, and user certificate authentication works!

  But I still have problems with machine certificate authentication.

  I get these errors:

  Machine on Active Directory authentication failed.

  Check if the machine account is active and present in Active Directory. Also check whether Active Directory is available.

  But the machine is present and active in AD.

  And AD works too. I know through the user certificate authentication, because the binary comparison is enabled:

  Looking 24432 user in Active Directory - [email protected] / * /

  24469 the user certificate was extracted from Active Directory successfully

  22054 binary comparison of the certificates was successful

  Authentication 22037 spent

  12506 EAP - TLS authentication successful

  If Windows Server 2012 AD is supported for the authentication of the computer? Or should I go go v1.2 for whom?

  Or it could just be something wrong with my setup

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Support for 2012's official in 1.2, the release notes for lists this as a new feature.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.2/Release_notes/ise12_rn.html#wp376082

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• Navigation problem and debugging

  JDeveloper 12.1.3

  Once again the warning: I am far from ADF pro, trying to learn, and maybe my question would be little sense:

  Scenario:

  1 Page 1 is a search with the results table page. Say with VO1Iterator VO1. If it's important at all, the page itself is jsff the activity view the BTF1 fragment with two cases of flow of control out of it: CFtoPage2 and CFtoPage3, both going activities Parent returns control to the main configuration adfc UTF. The user can click on Button1 or Button2 that fire corresponding Action bean method support and navigate to CFtoPage2 (Button1) or CFtoPage3 (Button2).

  2 page 2 is another fragment jsff in BTF2 with the link1, link3 to Page 3 and back to Page 1.

  3 page 3 (another BTF) has link to Page 1 only

  Problem:

  -While on Page 1, the user may access the Page 2 and 3 of the Page without problem

  -If on Page 1, the user goes to Page 2, and then to the Page 2 user link3 click nothing happens.

  -If on Page 1, the user accesses the Page 3, first, then goes back to Page 1, then Page 2 and click link3, navigation is successful!

  I don't see errors in case of a failed navigation. No idea how to debug this problem?

  Responses to 1)

  Have you implemented exceptions?

  If so, you should have then taken the NPE in the exception handler. For more information read Oracle ADF

  (2) the logging.xml is the build of the managed server. So if you bounce the server managed (in your case the embedded server) it will be re-created. For this, you can remove the system12.1.3... x.x.x./DefaultDomain. Then you can re-create the embedded weblogic server. Disadvantage is that each parameter that you did in your embedded server has disappeared.

  Timo