Issue of booking TMS

Similar Questions

• Issue of booking Resource Pool

  We used vSphere for a long time and this is the first instance where we watched in the use of resource pools to manage cluster resources.  What we try to do is pool funds from several different material groups buy and then distributed in equal shares of resources between these groups, but allow others to expand beyond what their fair share guaranteed if the resources are not being used by other groups.  And if the other groups are starting to need these resources in return, we want vSphere to restore "ready" transparently resources without causing any VM power issues etc.

  I'm pretty sure resource pools set reservations equal to assignment to a specific group is the way to go here.  If I understand correctly, resource pool bookings do not behave as the reserves of the VM, and even though I had to reserve 100% of cluster across pools resources collectively, a resource pool could grow beyond its reservation as long as there was no pretense.  When the contention starts, additional resources to a pool of resources will be taken away, but only to him guaranteed booking.

  Is my understanding of this is all correct?  Am I sure can cause problems, or a better way to accomplish this task?  Thanks in advance.

  It's the way I used to teach on reservations - think a restaurant which has 100 chairs - like the power of virtual machines on they have a number of chairs that they reserved - if the virtual machine needs more chairs he will get more chairs as long that other virtual machines do not use chairs they reserved - not what happens if all the chairs are reserved - the virtual machine will be not able to come into the restaurant (power on) even if there are empty chairs - if expandable restaurants reservations are activated a call is made to the room dining upstairs (the parent pool) to see if there are chairs available - this works in the same way for memory and cpu but memory has the ability to use the by vm vmkernel swap file and continue my analogy if all chairs are so reserved and a virtual machine appears they could sit on the patio, which can make the conversation (hard affect performance).

  When a virtual machine is turned off (leave the restaurant) it will come out of his reserve make room for several virtual machines.

• Issue export book file InDesign to PDF, is there too much InDesign documents?

  I work in a book file for a catalogue consisting of individual records. Each sheet is its own InDesign file because we use them separately, but at the same time have the version more up-to-date in the book. So this was our "simple" solution InDesign won't allow me to export the file of the book in PDF format, unless I have break in two PDF files so I can merge the file in Acrobat. It works fine, but I want to fix the original problem. I checked if all the files have been corrupted, but did not find a problem, then I wonder if there are too many InDesign file in the book. Is there a limit to how many files InDesign you can place in a book?

  It will be more addressable RAM problem...

• TMS by booking with MCU in cascade

  Hello

  My client has questions about booking TMS, they have 2 microcontrollers (4205,5320), CTS and 14.2 TMS endpoints

  They want to use 5320 as the main rooms for booking, but if the resource on 5320 is not sufficient for the booking then cascade 4205 to increase capacity.

  I found in the admin MSDS distribution routing guide (low cost print routing and better) but I'm not sure this device meet the requirement.

  The Administrator's guide also said "Different MCU models using cascade when manually configure cascade is not supported in Cisco TMS"

  Note it doesn't you different medium cascading of MCUS in TMS is not supported?

  Anyone try this before please advice.

  Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Wassila

  You can't necessarily force TMS to use a 5320 on a 4205. Remember, TMS treats all the ex-codians as the same, so it is not defined which, two bridges, TMS will prefer.

  Also note that MSDS does not automatically cascade; cascading always requires the invention of the user. The user must explicitly choose a distribution algorithm.

  Kjetil-

• Telephone directory of TMS export

  Hello world

  We have a server TMS configured and running, with several pounds of phone manual list.

  Now, I am deploying a new TMS and configuring everything from scratch (do not use existing databases), including telephone directories.

  I have re-created small manuals phone books, but I have several large (100 + contacts) and it would have took me ages to manually recreate the institutions.

  So, is it possible to export or copy the directories created manually 'old' TMS to the new?

  Thank you

  Petar

  You can export directories to a file, see the section "Export Contacts to a file" in the pg 203 15.3 TMS Administrator's Guide .

  It is also requested several times in the forums on how to export contacts from the phone book:

  TMS-export-directory-question

  How-Add-Excel-file-Address-Book-TMS

  How-can-i-Export-TMS-phonebooks

• double-sided indesign book numbering

  How can I issue a book back to the last page to those central and upside? I do a double face book that goes from one side to the Center, then you go back and you have another book with it's own pagination.

  I design something like this, annual report Arabic and English. I make each available language outside inside own document and then export one of these document in pdf format and place on the other indesign language use the following script with reverse order check on

  Zanelli releases MultiPageImporter for importing PDF and INDD files

  NDD - files.php http://indesignsecrets.com/Zanelli-releases-multipageimporter-for-importing-both-PDF-and-i

• Dangerous change in the approval process for iBooks

  you remember long time for approval of new iBooks users author books that publish their books on the iBook Store since the beginning. Originally, it was WEEKS, sometimes even months to get through the approval process. Fortunately, which improved considerably over time and now it's down to a period of 24 hours. remove your book from the store.

  I have published more than 17 books so far since the beginning of the iBook Store, and certainly, I look forward to this improvement. However, I just found out the hard way that this improvement comes with a terrible price.

  The new procedure:

  Is the approval process faster (not only) not due to more staff to go through the comments. Instead, it is due to an approval procedure has changed as it has been explained to me by the customer support. Now, the examiner spends less time going through the books to get quickly to the store. I don't know the details, but I guess they check the side more art if works and not actually reading it Word by Word.

  With this first less carefully past obviously comes a new stage. The Department for approval now takes books later (perhaps if they have more time or something) and check for any errors and delivers a ticket while your book is already on the iBook Store. In fact, at that time, that is not on the iBook Store more and this is the great potential disaster you should be aware of. If you get a ticket issued, your book get ripped the store until you propose changes and he crossed successfully a new review process, which could take days. It's wrong, really wrong, and he just happened to two of my books.

  Out of the blue, I got a ticket of the iBooks team for my book 'Logic Pro X - how it works', which lies on the line store since 2013 has been updated (and approved) last September. On one page, I had misspelled the name of "iBook" Store instead of "iBooks Store" and on another page, I got a link to the page of my book by asking readers to write a comment Amazon if they like my book. Of course, it was also a no-no (a multi-billionaire company referring to a competitor of billions of dollars with a link).

  I made the changes immediately and has the new version uploaded in an hour. But the review process took over 2 days, after I contacted support and recovery from the case. And here's the reason:

  At the moment they have issued the ticket, my book was not available on the iBook Store more, nothing, not even a mention that it is "temporarily unavailable" like Amazon. The visitors couldn't find the book, all the links from my Web site, twitter, facebook and other sites related, everything was made immediately a dead link. Not only did I lose money, I had to deal with customer e-mails explaining why they could not find the announced book. Last week, it happened with another book when I was in town for a week and had no files with me. And even once, it took 3 days to review the correction that I added 's' to the iBook Store.

  It is mind-boggling that the Team did iBook ' t think that through

  Why not keep the booking online during the update

  Why not give priority to the presentation (check two typos took longer than the initial review of the book).

  I asked the support team to issue feedback on this subject, so they can correct this procedure. In the meantime, you better watch for potential new tickets, or someone had the same problem already?

  HI Edgar,

  It's really good to know. Thank you

  Difficult to have a work around for this.

  (Got a ticket) Right now, I'm waiting for approval,

  After correcting a few minor problems.

  I hope this will get fixed soon.

  I like your idea to keep the original "approved."

  live version, until the update is approved.

  Should be a simple and logical

  changes to the procedure.

  Kind regards... Thomas

• E1000 - two routers come... 1 network leaves...

  Yes, he stole from Thunderdome, but he's not going to my question. I have 2 e1000s and bring them all to two internet are relatively simple. What is not so simple, for me, is to see these two places (each router & computers) as a major network, I can do the little file sharing. Two routers are connected via a CAT5 cable long enough. However, I will use different operating systems with them (Liunx, Windows, OS x, Android, XBox360, etc.) and I need them all see each other at both ends. I want them to leave with a nice, clean for the first router 192.168.1.1 and ask the second associated as 192.168.1.2 (using MAC address... reservations IF possible). I guess that the installer on the second router will have to be done manually and the DHCP should 'probably' be disabled so the first router can assign all IP # s. problem is, I'm not on my period on the manual configuration of the second router. I have tried setting up and had this message on the IP address of the router in router subnet 1 s 2. The last time I did any 'real' network has more than ten years and I'm rusty on all this. Basically I have not sat down and read the books involving all this because that, even if I am amazing on learning by example, I have a bit of a learning issue with books... she sucks and I am one of those who simply cannot get certain techno-jargon to stay in my brain, unless someone it simplifies a bit. Can someone point me in the right direction to sorta? PS - until I get all these answers to 'use the search engine', I already did. But a search engine can be one of two things, useful or useless depending on the person knowing the right words to use (and I obviously didn't). Again, it is a problem for me in some cases. If someone knows the answer, I'll be very grateful and I'll be more than happy to say 'thank you '. If you don't know the answer, just be an adult and leave that would be.

  1. follow the number 1.  LAN - LAN

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/UKP.aspx?VW=1&articleid=3733

  2. in addition, I click on the Security tab of the secondary router and uncheck "filter anonymous internet requests".  You will probably have to do it, but for some reason, I have to do this on an older linksys operate between main router and router secondary file share.

  The above configuration is that I use and I have no problem sharing files between computers.

• Telepresence - administrator password

  We have a client that requires us to change administrator passwords each quarter, and we need to change the password for the first time.

  I wanted to know if we run into any problems by changing the passwords on the CUCM, VCS VCS Expressway, MSE8000, TPS and TCS.

  Are there any traps or order that we follow?

  1. I wanted to make sure that the VCS, CUCM, MSE, and GST will have any issues registering with TMS.

  2. the VCS Cluster will have a problem?

  3. This can affect the OpenDS TMS?

  4. all the problems with TMSXE?  The TMSXE server is managed by another team, and we will not change this administrator login and password.

  Here is the list of the versions:

  CUCM - 8.6.2.2000 - 2

  TMS - 13.2

  TMSXE - 3.0.2.0

  VCS - v7.0.2

  VCS Expressway - V7.0.2

  MSE8000 - 2.2 (1.17)

  Telepresence Server - 2.2 (1.54)

  TC - v5.3

  Thank you

  Bryan Darnell

  Hi Bryan,.

  1. once change the admin password on these devices, you can update the TMS with the new password of the device tab connection from each device so that it can access using the new admin password

  2. There should be no effect on the VCS cluster, because each peer can have a different password for the user "admin".

  3. no effect on replication opends, as this is handled by different accounts

  see you soon

  Karim

• TMS ISSUE NR #3

  I was running MSD 15.2.1 with SQL 2008 on the same server VM.   I uninstalled TMS 15.2.1 on this server.  Only of SQL is for TMSNG.

  I created a new virtual machine and put TMS15.2.1 and pointed the old VM server and everything seems OK at the moment except.

  See the screenshot below. Showing that it considers services do not run on the old server, but TMS is on a new server with a different name.  How to clear this?

  Something is always oriented to the old name of the server and I checked, service TMS is not installed or running on the old SQL Server only.

  Is there something in the comic book that I need to empty, then she stops to think THAT TMS is on the old server?

  Also regarding the encryption key.  I have the new key showing in the TMS tools on the new server but the Save button is gray?

  VR

  Chet

  It's been a while that I've migrated a SMT from one server to another server.

  If you go to administrative tools > TMS Server Maintenance, under status of service TMS, what do you see?  See services for your old server and new, if, what happens if delete you the list and let the TMS fills again?

  The encryption key, the record regarding the button will become active if the key in the tools of TMS is changed.  Also suggest you do a check for any encryption key mismatch TMS tools > Diagnostic tools, if the encryption key has been changed.

• Protocol default conference when booking through TMS?

  trying to set up a conference using TMS to book and add participants.

  the booking works very well, I add my end points + the MCU.

  Conference starts... but endpoints do not join.

  When I look at the MCU - I see that this is a conference H323 - but my environment is exclusively SIP... then do not join endpoints.

  tried to create a model of default conference where I could put the default call Protocol - but I do not see where to set this variable.  Given a task in TMS under MCU settings where I could uncheck the box to allow incoming and outgoing H323 composition... still do not get connected participants.

  Preconfigured participant status

  Type	Name	Status
  H.323	Regional center	Unable to connect to the remote party
  H.323	Florida Regional	Unable to connect to the remote party
  H.323	Texas regional office	Unable to connect to the remote party

  someone knows how to do this?

  Thank you
  Paul

  HI Paul.  If you can verify something for me on your endpoints in MSDS.  Go to systems Navigator and choose an end point.  Once he arrives, click the System tab.  Then click on change settings.  Scroll down and you will see the MSD booking Options.  Uncheck all the other than SIP and Save.

  Do this on the same three endpoints, book again and let us know the result if you can?

  Thank you.

  VR

  Patrick

• SaveConference TMS booking API request fails with concurrentModificationException

  Hello

  I can't request a saveConference using the TMS v15 and Cisco TMS 14.6 booking API

  1. I do a backup Conference request without a session client because there is nothing first. I get an error 'ClientSessionErrorMessage_SessionBlank' and a session id is provided as planned.

  Request:

  http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope' xmlns:env ='http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/booking/" >15http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/booking/ ">722 .2015-04-25 13:00:00Z 2015-04-25 13:15:00Z 7 Win-lrb4bsm6uhe\apiuser-Domain1 API user Org = Domain1 [email protected] / * / one button to push 8B / 512 Kbps continuous Presence If Possible No. AutomaticBestEffort fake 18666543210 * 57101613 16TMS6B / 384 Kbps8B / 512 KbpsUSNotSaved0

  Answer:

  "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" xmlns:env ="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" container ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns: xsi = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" >SOAP: SenderClientSessionErrorMessage_SessionBlankhttp://10.251.4.15/tms/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx <> xmlns = "http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/" >-2147218247http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/ "> falsehttp://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/" > 92e0bfd3-e2a8-4f66-bbbb-423d44adbdfb .

  2. I use this sessionid to make the same request to saveConference, but with this the client session id this time. I get an error "the booking changed before your update was introduced. Ensure that you have the latest version of the reservation and try again. "How to fix this?

  Request:

  http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope' xmlns:env ='http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/booking/" >1592e0bfd3-e2a8-4f66-bbbb-423d44adbdfbhttp://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/booking/ ">722 .2015-04-25 13:00:00Z 2015-04-25 13:15:00Z 7 Win-lrb4bsm6uhe\apiuser-Domain1 API user Org = Domain1 [email protected] / * / one button to push 8B / 512 Kbps continuous Presence If Possible No. AutomaticBestEffort fake 18666543210 * 57101613 16TMS6B / 384 Kbps8B / 512 KbpsUSNotSaved0

  Answer:

  «http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"xmlns:env ="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"container ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"xmlns: xsi ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">SOAP: Senderthe amended booking before your update was presented.» Ensure that you have the latest version of the reservation and try again. http://10.251.4.15/TMS/external/booking/bookingservice.asmx " <> xmlns ="http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/">-2147218248http://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/" > falsehttp://tandberg.net/2004/02/tms/external/exception/ "> 30fe0343-b04f-4a47-a94c-45d1a0d47c60 '.

  Try to use getConferenceById to retrieve the object of the Conference you want to change. I suspect that the revision id is set to 0 when you use getDefaultConference. See the description of the attribute 'version ':

  Revision number of conference together, incremented and returned by Cisco MSDS with each record. By default, 0 if not included by the client. If the client tries to update a version which is not the
  later in the database, Cisco TMS will throw an exception.

• Recurring meetings TMS booking limits

  Hello, I have a customer who wants to be able to book a recurring meeting every Monday in his TMS until 2017. He gets an error message saying ".

  Selected date will result in a number of higher than the maximum 100 "recurrences. Is there a way to increase this value is greater than 100? I looked in the settings and can not find anywhere where you can increase this number... maybe I'm missing something. Let me know. Thank you!

  Hi Steve,.

  This limit is 100 and it cannot be changed, unfortunately. See the help page for TMS:

  

  Concerning

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.

• TMS - TCS booking bug?

  Hello!

  A client of ours brought something to our attention that I could not find money for.  When a conference is for TMS and you include a content server, the e.164 alias that TMS will use to connect to the content server gets changed after saved the Conference.  Please refer to the attached picture for an example.

  This was seen on the following combinations;

  TMS 13.2, TCS S5.0

  TMS 14.3, TCS S5.3

  In each case the TCS is registered in the VCS as a gateway.  The standard booking > page new conference has been used.  It didn't matter if one personal record alias was used, or a system generic alias record.

  One thing to note: If a H323 ID has been used instead of the e.164 alias, the obtained address was not changed.

  Has anyone else seen elsewhere?  Y at - it a bug that I missed?

  Thank you!

  It's not a bug, I remember reading the documentation for it, but I don't remember where...

  According to the doc, TMS will create an individual alias for each to the application so, expected the TCS drop out for a reason, or the Conference being disconnected, it will, when reconnected, continue recoding to the original file, rather than create a new record. Thus, you will end up with just a single file instead of two or more separate session files.

  If my memory is good; This only happens when the TCS is configured as bridge as opposed to Terminal (not 100% sure of that even if.)

  In the chart below you can see the difference, however, is as well as, in this case, the first two digits in the two aliases are the prefix of the gateway.

  

  

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• 5320 MCU in TMS - booking Conference

  I have a new 5320 MCU configured and managed in the TMS.  I can create a conference directly on the MCU, add participants, and it will dial a number and join the participants to the call correctly.  However, if I try to book a conference at TMS by selecting the participants and resource MCU, MCU does not connect endpoints for the call.  If I look at the details of calls that it said shows the following.  It's like he is waiting for the client to call the bridge, not the MCU outbound calls to customers?

  Participants will connect using this route:

  Customer MOVI ==> Bridge

  Hi if it is customer movi you attempt to dial, you must assign the automatic Conference connect and then add outgoing call participants where you type the movi/jabber address manually. You can see the connection setting tab before saving the Conference to see how the call will be set up (if the mcu expectd the customer allowing to switch or the mcu dial out). Customer MOVI has not automatically as regular endpoints generally have for the SCM cannot guarantee the call will implement.

  /Magnus

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App