JPG too saturated export

Similar Questions

• Problem with color, too saturated exported images management

  Hello

  I have an image in Photoshop (CS5, Windows 7) that I wanted to export to PDF and print it, but then I noticed the colours varied considerably making the result unusable.

  The image is composed in AdobeRGB and I work on a wide range of screen (Dell U2711) I calibrated and profiled with a Spyder4.

  In Photoshop, the image contains a beautiful dull light brown but when I open the PSD in Illustator or InDesign or when I export it as a PDF and view it in Acrobat, it is much too red in it. I enclose below an example of how the colors look like in Photoshop (left) and the rest of the system (right):

  

  (Note: this is a JPEG AdobeRGB, so the consultation on a normal range screen might not show as much difference that it is actually)

  This color shift is very extreme, and I don't know what the cause of the problems. I tried different profiles for my monitor (the only one I created with the Spyder, the profile of the Dell factory, the standard profile from AdobeRGB, no profile at all etc..). While the color has obviously changed a bit the problem as a whole has not changed: Photoshop shows the beautiful yellow brown, other applications show a very reddish image. The difference is even noticeable quite highly on my second monitor which is just a normal range of the screen with a range of about 73% of the sRGB colors.

  I also tried to export to a flat JPEG with no embedded profile that makes the result a little better, but the colors are still not accurate at all. It's very confusing because I don't know what the problem is and I don't know if it's just Photoshop the wrong colors or if other applications just to bad color management.

  It would be great if you could help me out here.

  Thank you.

  P.S. this problem could be linked to this thread http://forums.adobe.com/message/4178572#4178572 Although I couldn't find a working solution there.

  P.P.S. opening the image/PDF exported in Photoshop, product colors you want, once again, is not a weird conversion causing issues.
  

  If it is not the right profile, there would be at least two independent yet more fake profiles that I spend in assinging profiles of good and evil. I doubt it. I'm sure that Windows and Photoshop use the right profiles. Both monitors independently change when assinging different profiles and colors in Photoshop always will change accordingly.

  Applications that do not seem to choose the right profile are Illustrator, InDesign and Acrobat. When I do the primary external monitor they display the colors correctly. But as soon as I do the laptop monitor the main display colors aren't yet.

  So I guess that Windows and Photoshop are doing everything right, but Illustrator, InDesign and Acrobat use only the profile of the main screen. So on the range wide screen it is obviously all saturated (especially in red). However, when I put my main screen what they use it for both profile that specifies the range widescreen on the big screen and also quite accurate colours on the internal monitor because it's the color range is much smaller.

  I declare this a bug in these applications.

• Exported JPGs more saturated appear in LR

  I have LR5.3. I barely noticed it. Not sure whether or not it has been the case for some time. When I export from LR and make as sRGB jpg images, they are more saturated. Also, when I discovered in the Web Panel images are more saturated. Is this normal?

  Yes, ssprengel sums up.

  To put everything in very simple terms - and I repeat myself here: use only software successful color with this monitor. Software that's not color management will never display properly on a U2410. No question. Never. So find out who is and who is not, and which includes native applications for OS (Windows Picture Viewer is is not Windows Explorer).

  If you send pictures far and don't know where or how they will be considered (including Internet), convert it to sRGB and embed the profile.

  Always keep the calibrated and profiled monitor, as well as the color of managed applications having a monitor profile is valid for working with. This is the second absolute requirement that applies especially to the wide range of monitors.

  There is no particular reason to use the Adobe RGB preset on the monitor. You can create a profile on the top of the presets, but it is preferable to use "custom", puts the device in its native state without restriction. But once the profiles, do not change the preset.

  I have a wide range of Eizo, and if you obey these simple rules there is nothing to her. Everything works as expected.

• 5 Lightroom cr2 files to be converted to JPG format to export

  In lightroom 5 there is not an element of setting him allows me to modify cr2 files for export to jpg files.  How can I do this or not this version of Lightroom does not have this option?

  When you export, select the picture Format (under settings file) to be JPG.

• Jpg png are exported except some items...

  Hello everyone, I have a problem on the export of bitmap on illustrator cc images.

  These are original works,

  

  Here are the exported images.

  

  

  some text objects have disappeared... I changed the opacity, mixing effect, police... but this isn't work.

  but there is no problem when I saved in PDF format.

  do you have experiences with this problem?

  Thanks for any help

  Select the objects and then in the attributes Panel uncheck the overprint settings.

• Slightly too high export levels video

  Hello world

  I had this problem on earlier versions of Premiere Pro when exporting files .mov with the codec, DNxHD package of Codecs of Avid, from first CC this moment occurs in several other export formats as .mxf with DNxHD or XDCAM HD.

  To illustrate the problem, I just used a HD with HD Colorbars sequence.

  A screenshot of the original waveform (well between 0, 3V and 1.0V + super black) and a screenshot of the exported video is attached.

  Maybe it's a YUV RGB <>question?

  Thanks in advance!

  Source language

  

  Export of false

  

  The next first Pro CC update includes a fix for a problem with the levels and range in MXF OP1a encodes. I can't promise that it addresses exactly the problem you are having, but I love the sides.

• Colors too saturated in the editor

  I use PSE for years. Now all of a sudden with a new PC all colors are saturated in the editor. The images that look fine in other programs (Irfanview, Faststone, Windows Photo Viewer) seem terrible to post-secondary studies. They also seem OK on my TV connected by HDMI.

  My PC screen is also well adjusted. It is fair to Photoshop!

  Color management does nothing to improve things. Can someone help me with what is happening please?

  Thank you

  Have you tried to change the color settings in the editor. Go to Edition in the menu bar > select color settings > always select 'optimize colors for the parameters of the computer '.

  If this does not work can you share a snapshot of any photo for which colors look oversaturated.

• Images appearing too saturated in CS5 compared to the DPP?

  Hello world

  I like to use Canon DPP to display images, and then CS5 (especially camera raw 6.3) to edit images.  However, the images seem different in the two programs.  In DPP, the images seem normal quote, but in CS5 the Greens in the pictures seem distorted and false.  I have CS3 on my PS and the Greens are also false in CS3.

  No idea how to 'fix' these images in CS5, so I can change them effectively?  It is too difficult to do when the Greens are now so unhinged.

  I don't know a lot about color and/or management profiles.  If anyone can shed some light on this problem, it would be greatly appreciated!

  See you soon!

  Poppy

  If you open raw images in Photoshop's Camera Raw, place you on the Calibration section of the camera and try to choose the Standard camera or faithful camera profile instead of the default value.  I prefer the former for my Canon 40 d.

  

  It is generally possible, with some tweaking settings and starting with one of these profiles for Camera Raw conversions that have the color looks a lot like what the camera software product.  Once achieve you this, you can save the settings by default new Camera Raw, which will be used for any new image, which you open from the same device.

  A mistake that many people make is in thinking of software Adobe must produce the same color as their camera maker provided the software performs.  Personally, I think it would be less overall confusion if done Adobe Camera Raw Converter failure to do exactly that - or match very closely--but they simply do not have.

  -Christmas

• Export to sRGB-jpg: way to many color

  When I export a photo in an sRGB file, it has way to much color in the photo. In Lightroom 4.2 the photo looks good, but when I open the exported photo it looks like its too saturated. When I export the photo as AdobeRGB (1998), strange enough the photo search oke of 95%.

  What I am doing wrong?

  I use an Eizo ColorEdge CG243W monitor into sRGB mode. To make sure that it is not my monitor that is causing the problem, I watched the two photos (sRGB and ARGB) on a standard monitor on another computer. The result is the same: a lot of color in the sRGB, quite good colours in the ARGB file file.

  I use Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-bit. My video card is a MSi Radeon R7850. I use Lightroom 4.2 (system information: [850741]).

  I just bought this system. Before I used another computer, with the same monitor, were I tried Lightroom 3.2. I have not experienced problems here. Then I also used the monitor into sRGB mode. I exported to an sRGB file, the picture came out perfect.

  Everyone knows what I'm doing wrong?

  I suspect one of these two applications does not work properly with regard to color management. What browser do you use? Firefox IS managed by color and even the latest version of Chrome has finally got. Try one of those, and if as I hope, they look OK then your problem is certainly in Irfanview.

• Some imported more saturated jpg... why?

  I am a Flash slideshow and each slide is a jpg file. I created and saved all the jpgs with Photoshop, but some of them are extremely too saturated when imported into Flash. The part that confuses me the most, is that it's not all of them. There are a few that are perfect. I've tried everything I can think of to fix including: Save as a different file type (I tried tiff and png), all importers together, separately of their import, import directly to step straight to the library and adjust the properties of files jpg (I tried using the imported jpeg data and allows you to manually adjust the quality). Nothing I've tried doesn't change anything.

  Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!

  Furthermore, I use CS3 and XP Pro.

  When you create JPG in photoshop, make sure u set to RGB instead of CMYK mode

• Why my JPG so loses quality after the export of the PS?

  I use PS3. For some reason a JPEG that is exported from my PS was of very poor quality. See below:

  Here's what the image looks like PS, notice how the color dynamics is

  http://i970.Photobucket.com/albums/ae186/Planet_Invader/random/picture1.PNG

  Here is the JPG image after export, the satuation fell of so much!

  http://i970.Photobucket.com/albums/ae186/Planet_Invader/random/picture1.jpg

  Here's my setting for export

  http://i970.Photobucket.com/albums/ae186/Planet_Invader/random/Picture2.PNG

  The strange thing is, when it is phothographs, it doesn't have this problem.

  Also, can someone tell me what they would do to make the highest effect? I've pretty much has attracted some of these forms wavy and copied them and placed individually, which was very time consuming. If you have a better way please let me know! Thank you!

  Lack of understanding of color management?

  In Photoshop, Photoshop is using the document profile and compensation for your screen.

  Outside of Photoshop, it will depends on what application you use to display the image to know if it will fix your screen or not.

• Export all pages with 100% quality jpg

  Hello

  When I try to export all pages in my document as 100% quality JPG with the 'Export Assistant', some pages are still exported as GIF.

  I see that there is a combo box of compression in the property inspector, but when I select "JPG - quality" I still don't get a quality of 100% (I get jpg blur around the text, for example).

  Can someone help me? Is there a quick way to export all pages with a 100%? I've yet to find a button that says, for example, 'apply 100% quality for all pages '.

  Thank you!

  If you use Fireworks CS5, you can select all pages, then the optimization goto Control Panel and set the settings jpeg 100%.

  Optimization settings applies to all pages, and then you should be good to export all pages.

  .. Dorin

• How to export pictures to a .jpg file

  Hello
  
  Is it possible to flash to save or export an animation that you ensure that each frame of your animation records in a file separate jpg?

  daveyp2tm wrote:
  > Hello,
  >
  > Is it possible to flash to save or export an animation that you ensure that each frame of your animation records in a file separate jpg?

  Export file - export - movie (CTRL ALT SHIFT S)

  Choose JPG sequence from the menu drop-down' as type Safe

  --
  Best regards

  Urami

  --
  "Never play leapfrog with a Unicorn."

  
  If you want to send me a message - DO NOT LAUGH at MY ADDRESS
  

• How to export a JPEG image at 300 dpi? PS keeps exporting to 96 DPI res attributed image 300px although / in

  in Photoshop CC 2015.1 I have made sure my image is at 300 DPI by going to "Image > Image size" and set the resolution to 300 pixels per inch. However, when I go in "file > export > export as >"JPG "image is exported to 96 dpi. I know that the PS is exports to 96 DPI because when I open the image exported with the PS, the resolution is set at 96 dpi. Therefore, when I import the exported in Acrobat, PDF pages images look too big zoom 100%. I want to use 300 DPI because in this way the image (which has a resolution of 2500 x 3500 px) will look at a reasonable size at 100% zoom on the PC screen average when given via Adobe Acrobat. I also tried to export PS using "file > export > save for Web", but the results were the same.

  So far the only solution that worked using PS must convert the PSD of a JPG using "" file > save as > JPG ". However, this method does not provide the export settings as much as "file > export". It's not possible to export JPEG files at 300 dpi with "file > export"?

  My another workaround is to use a 3rd party software called XnConvert to change the dpi of the exported image without changing its dimensions in pixels.

  Do not export, it is an unfinished feature that will remove the color profile, causing the images appear more saturated.

  And it's probably defaults to 96 DPI, I don't think that you can change that.

  PPI is metadata used by printer drivers to calculate print size, and it has no effect on the display screen. Dimensions in pixels are all that matters.

  If you want to export multiple images at the same time, take a look at the image processor, located under file > Scripts.

  I never use it, (I do this kind of thing in Lightroom), but I think you can select images in Bridge and run it from there.

• Export contrast brightness bright wrong eye

  I use lightroom cc and have a problem when I export to jpg.  The exported image looks the same as the picture seen in Lightroom as a nef file saving from Photoshop.  If I open the nef file in Photoshop cc 2015, make no changes, and save it as a JPG file the resulting image looks the same as the image in Photoshop and Lightroom.  For consistency, I recorded two jpgs in AdobeRGB (1998), but had the same results with sRGB.  I downloaded Lightroom and reinstalled and tried different color profiles, but not luck.

  This is the file NAVE as displayed in Lightroom.

  

  The JPG exported from Lightroom looks quite different. There is more contrast, different saturation, and it seems that the vived has been amplified.

  

  The JPG in Photoshop looks like the original NEF file:

  

  Here are my Lightroom settings:

  

  Indeed, make sure you that you calibrate your monitor, it's one thing to do. Then go to develop and check if there are parameters of development applied to images reimported. Everything must be cancelled and the tone curves need to be completely linear. If this is not the case, press reset and see what happens. If you notice that some settings have been changed, there is a "Preset" applied to importation or camera default applied. Check again that the auto tone is not set and the default values have been reset and that in your import Panel there is no selected preset. Finally, there is a setting that can trigger a bug when reimporting files that have their origin in Lightroom. It happen constantly, but check if in your catalog settings, in the metadata Panel setting "Include settings to develop in the metadata in JPEG, TIFF, PNG and PSD files" is unchecked. It can lead to Lightroom settings doubles applied if you re-import the file. It would be only be something to check if find you that a lot of develop settings have been applied to your image.