MCU Conference Ad Hoc autodisconnect

Similar Questions

• Costum MCU Conference welcome/PIN screen

  Hello community,

  is it possible to change the landing page for the MCU conferences. We can just put a small banner, but the Don t of Page looks like goods.

  Thank you very much.

  Other auto attendant banner and a welcome message general, you can't edit what specific conference.

• By TMS MCU conference number

  Hi all

  We recorded with vcs several MCU Standing Conference, the source of the telephone directory of endpoint is TMS. I am able to discover and manage all the end points of TMS.

  How to display the number of MCU Permanent conference on endpoint through TMS telephone directory? So that users could dial into permanent conference of the directory itself?

  Currently, I have discovered all the endpoints of TMS and its appearance on all telephone directories of endpoint.

  Thanks in advance!

  Bobby

  Hi Bobby

  Create a new source 'manual list type' less manage sources of the telephone directory. Save and add a contact. Type the conference name, add it.

  Now click on the add contact method and write the address you use to dial the Conference. SIP or H323, (E164 alias is H323)

  Save it and go in manage inventories, create a new directory and connect the source you just created. Then click on set on systems and select all the systems you want to see this directory. And save.

  Every endpoint should now be able to compose this conference through the phone book.

  / Magnus

• Cisco VCS and MCU - Conference does not

  Dear community members

  I have problems in the VCS configuration to work with the MCU to join to several endpoints in a conference. The components that I use:

  -Cisco VCS control v8.7.

  -Cisco 5300 MCU 5310 v 4.5 (1.72)

  -3 x SX20 end points

  I recorded every endpoint and MCU on VCS, but I'm not able to do a conference call 3-way, the only option is 1 video and 1 audio (I disabled the Multisite option). It seems that VCS does not yet call the MCU in the game.

  Kindly help us with it.

  Can you tell us how you set up the Conference and how you have configured MCU and endpoints?

  From the sounds of it, you call each end point of one of the SX20s, but you must call simply directly in the Conference on the MCU.  If you want to have a conference point to point between two end points and then degenerate into a multipoint conference on the MCU, you must configure Multiway.

  With the help of Multiway with Cisco TelePresence systems

• Conductor create no MCU conference

  Deployment:

   CUCM 10.5 MCU5310 4.5 Conductor XC3.0.2

  I have a CUCM - conductor - MCU deployment and I am trying to set up the Conference date. I can call from end to bridge conference and point, by a busy year and the conductor I see the following:

   2015-03-02T17:27:02+01:00 conferencefactory.controller: Level="INFO" Event="An incoming call request has been rejected because the conference is not present." Conference_name="991115.my.meeting.alias" Destination-alias="[email protected]/* */" Detail="Can not create a scheduled conference. Scheduler must create conference before it can be used" Requester_(VCS/Unified_CM/client)_address="10.10.10.6" Source_protocol="SIP" Unauthenticated_source_aliases="[[email protected]/* */]" UTCTime="2015-03-02 16:27:02,99" 

  I see on the call history

   B2BUA rejected call on the Ingress with 486 Busy Here (Policy lookup response)

  On Journal MCU and Traces SIP I see nothing new, but on the driver of the Conference Bridge status is fine

   MCU (No description available); TelePresence MCU Enabled, Active. Utilisation: 0%

  No idea what could be the problem? i thing conductor to MCU something isn't good.

  Your question would be more place in the section of telepresence to the forums where these devices are more actively discussed in the conferences section you have posted in.  You can move your discussion by editing your message and change the categories at the bottom.

  It seems that you have either the Conference alias or the defined template to not allow incoming calls create the Conference, which means that only a planning as TMS application can create the Conference using the API of a conductor.

  Check the following in the conductor

  • Conference models > [model] > at the request of conference
  • Conference alias > [aliases] > Conference to create

  Also, sometimes people forget to have encryption enabled on the MCU and configured the MCU for the driver to use port 5061.  Which can also cause the Conference to fail.

• Caan you explain a conference AD Hoc and Randezvous

  Hello world

  Can you please explain to me someone AD Hoc Conference and Randezvous type?

  Thank you

  See this link: types of conferences

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• Cisco TMS assigns a numeric ID for the MCU Conference Scheduler

  Hey Cisco

  I create a conference planner tms 14.6, the Conference is to create, but the digital ID is not available until this conference began.

  picture attached

  I need see digital ID before.

  I've not being updated to 14.6 TMS, but in 14.4 and I'd be surprised if this had been changed to 14.6, you can specify a system to switch to the MCU, in which case the address is displayed as below in the screenshot;

  mcu2.gif

  

  or, you can find the address by locating the Conference in the conference control center, then place the cursor on the MCU and you should see a small window showing all the relevant address, as seen in the screenshot; below

  MCU.gif

  

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• a way to move c90 to 5320 mcu Conference

  I have a setup where we use the multi-site c90 option. Is it possible to move a video conference live from c90 to 5320 mcu. The reason is that there may be a 5 attending the video conference and c90 can handle 4 (3 + himself). I don't know if one needs for 5 participants before the video conference begins and I have no port on the 5320 MCU to run all the video conference with this

  Does anyone know a solution to this?

  Best regards

  Jesper

  Check:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/TC6/api_reference_guide/codec-C90-API-reference-guide-tc62.PDF

  
  xCommand Call UnattendedTransfer
  Transfers an ongoing call to another participant. The CallID is returned when the xCommand Dial command is run. During the call you can run the xStatus Call command to see the CallId. Fully supported for SIP calls only.
  Requires user role: USER
  Parameters:
  CallId(r): <0..65534> Number(r):
  Example:
  xCommand Call UnattendedTransfer CallId: 2 Number: [email protected]/* */ com
  *r TransferUriResult (status=OK): ** end
  

• TMS Conference ad hoc

  Hello

  Previously, a point-to-point call is initiated in tms the call appears as active but not now. someone knows why this happens?

  I will review the option: ' administrative tools / Configuration / Netword Setting / enable discovery of Ad-Hoc conference "and Yes

  I think the problem is because a flow of communication but a can´t see documentation on this.

  Kind regards!

  Hello

  In addition to what Wayne suggests, check the MSDS Server IIS enables anonymous authentication for/tms/public /. I recommend you do a network trace on the TMS server and check how the events of feedback since endpoints are received by IIS.

  Kind regards
  Kjetil

• Join the public network through the firewall option MCU Conference

  Hello world! Lately, we have a goal to jabber (without vpn) of internet users to join conferences within our network. Our telepresence infrastructure includes VCS, MCUS and endpoints (MX, SX). I discovered that MCU (4505) has a feature called video firewall option (under license). My question is whether it will be sufficient to achieve our goal? I've also heard that VCS expressway is used. What is the difference between these two?

  Firewall MCU option just the second NETWORK card, so you can have one with a public IP address and the second with a private IP address (essentially NAT'ed), and the internal and external clients will be connecting to a virtual meeting room common pre-configured on the MCU.

  The VCS-E (Expressway) works in tandem with your VCS - C to offer secure firewall courses. VCS - C is located on the inside of you firewall and the VCS-E is normally in the demilitarized zone.

  This allows, among other things, external systems to call your systems using H.323 and SIP URI dial, this includes clients of JabberVideo, but not Jabber client CPU.

  For Jabber clients you would deploy normally expressway-e series, see http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/expressway-series/datasheet-c78-730478.html and http://ciscocollab.wordpress.com/2014/01/29/deploying-collaboration-edge/ - whether it will work with your existing deployment is another story, you might be better off ultimately to something similar to Pexip or Acano - both were developed by former TANDBERG/Codian/Cisco engineers.

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• How to educate the MCU conferences hosted on another MCU

  Hello

  We have the MSE 8510 and MSE 8710 MCU. The auto attendant is configured on the MCU 8510.

  The Conference is organized on the MCU 8710, external participants connect to AA cannot join the same Conference because the 8510 MCU is not abreast of conferences hosted on a different MCU.

  How can we get the MCU 8510 abreast of conferences organized on the MCU 8710?

  It is not possible to link the two conference bridges.  You mention that when external participants dial in the auto attendant 8710, the 8710 doesn't have an auto attendant.  Why not have dial and then directly to the Conference on the 8710?

• Telepresence MCU - Port vs Adhoc Conferencing booking

  Hi all

  I was wondering why is the MCU software disabling creation of ad-hoc conferences for unknown, when calls media port reservation is turned on.

  Is there a way to run multiway microcontroller, which has the port reservation lit?

  Thank you all,

  Emre

  Hello

  You want to know why MCU works this way? It's simple, because this single behavior that makes sense to the concept of "reserve". Consider the following example:

  You have scheduled a conference in MCU for tomorrow morning at 10:00. You have a MCU 4510 with 20 available HD ports and selected 18 participants in this conference in particular, and you use reserve port, which means you want MCU to make sure that these ports are available to host this conference. Right. Then in the morning, just before the scheduled conference start, some users start an ad-hoc multipoint meeting using multiway and down 4 video ports of your MCU. Then, when the scheduled conference start, MCU will ports available to host your regular conference, once your users use the resources for purposes of adhoc.

  Do you see? Port reservation is a concept where MCU is to ensure that you will have the resources available to the conference in particular, therefore, the only way to achieve this is by totally disabling chartering conferences (ad hoc conferences), so that the MCU will be able to control the entire session and know when its resources will be available or not, either by using MCU to plan or TMS.

  In other words, if MCU allowed you to create conferences whenever you want via adhoc, then the concept of reservation is completely broken, you wouldn't have no guarantee that your resources are really reserved.

  Therefore, if you have need to be scheduled and ad hoc conferences happening in the same MCU, disable a reservation and manually control your availability of resources. If you must make a reservation from port and at time same adhoc conferences, it is not possible except by placing an other MCU in your environment, you will so use an MCU to scheduling with reserve and another for ad hoc conferences.

  I hope this helps.

  Paulo Souza

  My answer was helpful? Please note the useful answers and do not forget to mark questions resolved as "responded."

• CUCM + MCU + CISCO TMS integration

  I'm marching integration with MCU 4.5, 10.5 CUCM, sx20 and TMS 14.5

  According with manual bellows

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/MCU...

  I ve done a Deploying an MCU as a multimedia resource for Unified CM.

  MCU has a SIP trunk with 10.5 CUCM, MCU is recorded as the Conference on the multimedia resource.

  SX20 Conference ad hoc works well with another 7 codecs.

  My question is

  I want to plan conferences by mcu or cisco TMS, but I am not able to do.

  How can I integrate Cisco TMS or planning by MCU?   It s not working not on my side.

  Hello

  Please see the following guide

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/TMS...

  HTH

  Manish

• MCU resource

  Hi all

  If there are users who make adhoc videoconferences (ie. call each other using Jabber (conferences)

  rather than use the Tanberg Planner or directly call endpoint to the point of termination using the MCU (conferences) ports and not multi.

  If the bridge was full and another conference was planned for this day there, he would kill the ad hoc conferences? Or the scheduled conference fails?

  I have not tested but will do tonight but wrap someone already knows the answer, it would be appreciated and save me money and time business.

  Concerning

  Hugh

  Hi, Hugues

  If you need a scheduled conference, you must enable Media Port réservation on your MCU.

  Otherwise, your scheduled conferences may not start.

  Sorry, Conference begins, but not all participants can connect :-)

  BR Oleksandr

• 5320 MCU software update 3.1 TS

  We currently have 5320 MCU running version 4.5 (1.45). I see that Cisco offers code TelePresence MCU server:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/conferencing/Telepresence-MCU-5320/model.html#releasenotes ~ rdtab1

  Looking at the release notes is not very clear if when running 3.1 GST in MCU we will lose the ability to "Téléprésence MCU" in CUCM to use this 5320 MCU for Ad - hoc conferences.

  I know that GST 3.1 does not offer this possibility, but if you look at the file name for the MCU is cisco_ts_3.1_1.98_for_mcu_5300.zip (32,04 MB) vs GST 3.1 cisco_ts8700_3.1_1.98.zip (26,24 MB)

  Thank you

  If you upgrade your 5320 MCU with the telepresence server migration software, it will transform the MCU in a server of telepresence for all functions and features will be a telepresence server and not a MCU.  See the Software of TS running on MCU 5300 Series installation guide on how to convert your MCU to a telepresence server, if you are interested.

  Here are two good discussions comparing platforms MCU and telepresence server, one of them specifically on migration from one to the other.

  What-difference-between-MCU-Cisco-Telepresence-Server

  Why-Replace-MSE-8510-MCU-44-Telepresence-Server-31

  The cisco_ts_3.1_1.98_for_mcu_5300 software is for a series of 5300 MCU migrating to a server of telepresence.  The cisco_ts8700_3.1_1.98 software is specifically for the hardware already running a TP server software, such as the various servers of telepresence models listed here, this includes MCUs migrated to the server TP as the 5300 MCU to MCU MSE 8510 series software.