MOUNTING ENDPIOINTS IN CODIAN MCU

Similar Questions

• Forcemore than two end points to use Codian MCU

  I have a lot of C90s, E20s, 150 points of termination. I wish that the conferences of two or more to always use the Codian MCU.

  Can I do this with model templates.participant conference, or elsewhere?

  It depends on the specificity.

  If you book these conferences, using TMS, then you need to configure your advanced conference Options.  "Use of the external MCU in routing" must be set to "Always, except for point to point" and "Favorite MCU Type in routing" must be set to "TANDBERG Codian MCU".

  If these are Ad - hoc conferences, then what you want is Multiway (i.e. Conference Factory).  However, this requires a VCS.  The Guide deployment of Multiway for more details.

  http://www.Tandberg.com/support/DL.php?id=1119&dir=Deployment_Guides&fn=Cisco_VCS_Multiway_Deployment_Guide_X5.PDF

  Series L (T150) endpoints may not trigger a Multiway call according to the docs, but which may have changed since the doc is a bit outdated now.  They can be attached to a Multiway call however (L6.0 or higher).  MXP requires F8.0 or higher.

  If no one who works for you, your only option is to configure the Codian to create a new ad hoc conference on incoming calls to the conferences of the unknown and then give your a prefix of Service H323 MCU so that all calls with this prefix will route to the MCU and start a conference by using this code.  Make sure that your parent model has digital ID H323 and SIP registration active.

  The Codian in itself is not able to force someone to use for Multisite; This seems to be what you might think from model issues.

• TMS 14.3.1 played not well with Codian MCU 4520 - bug?

  TMS 14.3.1

  Codian MCU 4.4 4520 (3.57)

  After upgrading from 14.3 to 14.3.1 MSDS that I find THAT TMS is no longer recognizing the Codian as being registered at a Registrar SIP (VCS - C x7.2.2) and active SIP server address is empty.

  As a result, it is no longer allow me to plan only calls SIP; that is to say:

  

  In the above Conference, participants at the Summit must be either H.323 or SIP, participating below place SIP (JabberVideo customer 'business'), as well as participating number 3 (customer 'free' JabberVideo).

  Before the upgrade, I've always had the choice of SIP, H.323, and if necessary, IP, now I have only the choice of H.323 and where appropriate, IP.

  Curiously, when using multi-way, it will connect to the customer external jabber.com as SIP - SIP, while in a scheduled call, he'll be H.323 - SIP and appeal in the VCS - E it actually displays H.323 - H.323.

  I have no problems with the old MPS800; Active listed address in TMS SIP server as per normal, and I can choose to H.323, SIP and IP.

  So, is this a bug?

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

  In the MCU configuration.xml, should say something like:

  user_name VCS.example.com"registrar_name =" example.com"="[email protected] / * /"/ >" "

  The field that is empty in your TMS screenshot ("Active SIP server address") must have been populated by proxy_name value in the confiuration.xml that I can see.

  EDIT: looks like we have made a code change in TMS 14.3.1 when it comes to check the address of the SIP server: in previous versions, read and used TMS 'registrar_name', but from 14.3.1, it reads and uses the "proxy_name" instead.

  Kjetil-

• Application of floor on Codian MCU

  Hi all

  I want to know the meaning of the events by Codian MCU log output when endpoint sent a request for floor.

  There are newspapers that I captured after that I sent a request floor MXP endpoint.

  Conference CONFERENCE Info 13959 29/07/2012 17:29:43.254 'Name of the Conference' - set floor participating 1272

  Participant of CONFERENCE Info 13960 29/07/2012 17:29:43.254 1272: grateful request floor

  13961 29/07/2012 17:29:43.299 CONFERENCE Info participant_message_fn 1272: request floor

  Could someone let me know what each line means?

  Best regards and thanks in advance

  Kotaro Hashimoto

  Hi Kotaro-san,

  Third line in the newspapers show the message, it is not sent by MCU.

  It shows the real message received by request IE MCU for floor.

  Not sure what is "fn" stands for.

  Kind regards

  Sagar

• T3 with Codian MCU

  Is it possible to run a system of T3 with a Codian MCU.

  On Cisco Live in London one saw a new 53xx Codian MCU, anyone know if TIP will run on this new platform.

  Alex

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Hello

  It is possible to have the system T3 to a Codian MCU conference join.  But note that the experience and the type of diagram you see will be very different from when you use the telepresence server.

  With respect to the MCU, 53xx, I think that it does not support the TRICK.

• 4510 question not enabled SIP Codian MCU

  Hello, my company sent me a Tandberg VCS and a Codian MCU 4510 to configure and test our video phones) SIP (based on.  The only problem is that they have not provided me with an activation key product yet.  I'm going to encounter problems, until I get the key?  Thanks in advance!

  Hello, Emery, the MCU is not functional until you get the key. Your company should be able to get that for you either partner having bought it from or directly from Cisco beginning with the account manager or systems engineer. Or you can try to send the serial number of [email protected] / * /

• Codian MCU 4505 content encryption is not possible

  Hello

  I'm having a problem with MCU 4505:

  If I put the SIP trunk to the Codian MCU (to route calls with a specific prefix) for the MCU to TLS instead of TCP, the content channel could not be seen on other participants. I see in the statistics of participants, that the content string is sent from one endpoint to the MCU, but not received from the other particpiants. In the view of the Conference, I saw the following message:

  TX of content: encryption is not possible

  I checked the docs, but the description of this cause is not really free explaining:

  The MCU is unable to send the encrypted video content to this participant.

  If I put the trunk for TCP, no encryption is used and the sharing prentation works as expected. Basically, the encrpytion works fine, because the audio and video channels are received and sent as expected.

  No matter who else knows this problem or ideas how to solve this problem?

  BTW: Versions of software:

  MCU 4505 4.3 (1.68)

  EX60 TC 5.1.4

  Jabber 4.5

  C20 TC 5.1.4

  

  Kind regards

  Paul

  It is noted as a known bound in notes;

  "The transmission of content SIP of the MCU by using the binary protocol (BFCP) ground control is not supported on.

  encrypted calls. To allow content to pass on SIP calls in a separate main video channel, you should

  Disable encryption on the MCU or target endpoint. »

  The MCU supports the transmission of content encrypted on H.323 calls only, but not the SIP.

• Cannot connect to the Codian MCU 4550

  I have a client who has a 4550 Codian MCU.  They recently had their lines ISDN, replaced by the local Telco Co. and since then the admins MCU have not been able to connect to implement calls.  They can reach the web interface, but can not go further.  I had to try and telnet/ssh into the device and run a password admin clear command but couln t connect, giving them the return "connection refused".  I have them also trying the connection by default where they do not have reset it and it didn't work.  Is anyone in this forum know of another way to get with admin rights and rest the two other accounts?

  Hi Shane. Telnet or SSH is not available on these units. If they can't get into the unit with the admin password, then a console reset_config may be your best bet. Also do not know why change of ISDN lines would this Holy as these microcontrollers have no direct ISDN connections.

  VR
  Patrick

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• VCS-E calls directly to Codian MCU Auto standard

  How do I create rules of research on my E - VCS to route direct calls to its IP address or hostname to go in-house auto attendant Codian MCU--> my autoatendant has a 31 conference ID and we have 99 registered in my inner - VCS - C so 9931).  We had so many difficulties with external companies, connection using several addressing methods (VCS - eIP ##MCUmeetingID, or [email protected] / * /, whatever).  It is much easier to have external users, type an IP address and be dumped directly in the auto attendant and we can move everywhere where from there.  I don't know everything that the Alias Search and regex and replace the criteria and do not want to cause problems with external courses and Movi SIP calls that we use.  Need help.

  Hi, Frank.  My apologies.  X5.1.1, its under VCS Configuration > search rules > Configuration.  Should be the help alias section here.  Let me know how it turns out.

  VR

  Patrick

• Codian MCU - banner of Cisco

  Hello, is it possible to keep the welcome message, but to get rid of the Cisco home page to appear when you enter into an ad hoc meeting?  It does seem in order for the Cisco banner except under the auto-attedent.

  This setting affects the Cisco logo icon superimposed, it affects all matter superimposed Conference icons.  These two parameters are separated from each other.

• Why the MCU is automatically added to the conferences in TMS?

  Info:

  Endpoints: Tandberg 6000 MXP & 95 MXP

  TMS: 13.2.2

  Codian MCU 4510: Software version 4.4

  Tandberg GK: N6.3

  Tandberg BC: Q6.3

  When I create a conference at TMS and want an end point to compose our system to an MCU on another site (confined), the our local MCU is automatically added to the Conference, for some reason any.  For example, if I create a conference with room 123 and number 'Dial Out' external 2222222, TMS adds MCU of our system and forces to compose both room 123 and 2222222, which is totally useless.  This should be simply, what is the endpoint is, a direct line to 2222222.  Why the MCU is being added?  This will use licenses MCU in haste when it is not necessary at all.

  I went through TMS > administration tools > Configuration > General settings, network settings and conference settings and cannot understand why the MCU is added.  If we dial manually, no problem.  My goal is to automate the entire composition, however.

  Pointers?  I put some of the parameters of the TMS > Admin Tools > Configuration > Conference settings below.

  

  Luke

  Hello

  Reduce the bandwidth of conference help? TMS could add a MCU if it detects that one or more participants do not support the bandwidth conference.

  Kind regards

  Kjetil

• Why replace MSE 8510 MCU 4.4 with Telepresence Server (3.1)

  We have a with MCU 4.4 MSE 8510. Looking at the software accessible to the general public, that looks like that I could replace the software with the telepresence instead server software.

  Why I do this? What can I win (and lose) by? I don't have any old CTS systems, just Jabber, MXP and C systems. Is telepresence server software that is actively developed while the old software MCU is not?

  Thank you

  I agree with you, Codian MCU is the best.   =)

  This is why I think Cisco is not going to add MCU multi-screen support, because if MCU multi-screen support, I don't know that all customers would not want to migrate to server TP or buy a new server TP.

  But because of these two main features of server TP, we think about its use, who are the multimonitor support and support for the optimization of the resources with the driver.

  Many Cisco! As always... In this way, they can keep the two products on the market, MCU and GST.

  Paulo Souza

  My answer was helpful? Please note the useful answers and do not forget to mark questions resolved as "responded."

• Automatic standard MCU

  Hello

  I have two Codian MCU. A 4510 and a 4210. Currently I have my E Expressway pointed toward the auto attendant 4210, but want to show available on the MCU 4510 meetings as well.

  Is this possible?

  Thanks in advance

  Cam

  Hello Cam-

  It is not possible to link the two MCU auto attendants, as they are separated and free in their own MCU.

• Presence MCU

  Can someone tell me if the Codian MCU supports the publishing presence to a VCS for each conference that is [email protected] / * /, [email protected] / * /, etc... ?

  We used to use OCS and if I remember well, I'm sure that we could see the presence of meeting rooms (added as users to AD) of the OCS client. Is it possible to have the same experience through a Movi/Jabber client? I tried to look in the documentation, but I can't find anything!

  Darren,

  It is true, that you should not see the presence for the MCU AA in this case either, assuming that the field for the two URI is the same (so that the rule of research would be two URI).

  Please check your PM Inbox as I sent you a message there.

  -Andreas

• Shimming to disapper of MCU

  Hi all

  When we connect codecs to Codian MCU, we see endpoints on the call to "Home > Conferences > Conference 'name' > Participants ' on the MCU.

  And if remove us a LAN cable, for an endpoint to the call, the name of the codec disappears from the list of Participants soon.

  The time differs from SIP and H.323 however, someone knows how to vary the time to let the codecs will disappear from the list of participants?

  (In this case we do not use VCS control because our client has not)

  Best regards

  Kotaro Hashimoto

  As you said that if you have for example VCS control then you have much more control over how long calls are to expire.

  If you use just the MCU to perform direct SIP/h.323 calls without a guardian/Registrar then it is not possible to control what the default is hardcoded and the mechanism by which the disconnection occurs is different.

  With participating H.323 is removed when the h.225 or h.245 TCP connections time out, and I think the timer is in the order of two minutes. With SIP, the participant will be disconnected when the SIP session timer expires, is negotiated in the SIP signaling when the call is set up, it might be more like 5 minutes by default.

  This does not mean that it will take either two or 5 minutes for the call to be deleted, but rather that happen at the end of the next expiration 'window', so the exact time will vary.