Multicast and cisco VPN client

I have an XP PC which is on a remote site, I need to connect to my corporate network through the VPN client. This PC has 2 cards NIC - one for a private LAN, which receives the data via multicast, and a public LAN, which will be used for the VPN.

When I connect the VPN, multicast reception stops. Is it possible to activate on the second NIC card (private)?

Can you go into the network card properties, disable / uncheck deterministic Network Enhancer and see if that makes a difference?

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

SafeNet and Cisco VPN Client Compatible?

I have been using the Cisco VPN for quite awhile with no problems. Recently, we have added a Watchguard Firebox somewhere else and have installed the Client of Watchguard MUVPN, otherwise known as a customer of Safenet.

Since the installation, I could not yet properly use the Cisco Client. If I disable the two Services of Safenet, I invited to my user id and password and connect to the Cisco Concentrator and get an ip, etc. However, I can't ping anything on the network.

My solution is to completely uninstall both clients and reinstall the Cisco by itself. This is not very practical.

If anyone know a fix for this I'd appreciate comments.

Thank you

Patrick Dunnigan

Hi Patrick,

I only got lucky with the SafeNet customer brand Watchguard with the 4.0.x releases of the Cisco client. I think Cisco 4.6 clients use a newer driver from the DNE or else that plays well with SafeNet.

In any case, here's how to set up PC that requires both clients:

First, install the Cisco VPN client. Restart the application, and then stop and disable the Windows service.

Install the client for Watchguard, reboot as requested.

Then, stop and set to manual both SafeNet services, then start and set to automatic the Cisco service.

Delete the shortcut in your Start menu Startup group safecfg.exe (or the key of HKLM\MS\Windows\CurrentVer\Run, where he gets set.)

Delete the shortcut to start for the Cisco VPN client as well.

Whenever you want to use the Cisco customer, you can just launch the Dialer to IPSec. If you want to run the SafeNet client, stop the Cisco service, start the services of SafeNet, then run safecfg.exe. A few batch files facilitate this process for users.

Hope that helps,

Chris

MS RADIUS and Cisco VPN client

We currently have with a Server Windows RAS and IAS authentication with PPTP to users.

I want to move a hub (we have two not used) and the use of the Cisco VPN client with IPSEC 3005, also using the RADIUS (IAS) in Windows to authenticate against Active Directory.

I have a config to work for the client and it performs authentication, but I'm afraid that you can't configure IAS to work with IPSEC, unless you configure the policy for

"Unencrypted authentication (PAP, SPAP).

on the Authentication tab

and

"No encryption".

on the encryption tab.

Are encrypted with IPSEC credentials to establish the tunnel of the Cisco VPN client?

For RADIUS PAP authentication, the user name is clear and the password is encrypted with the RADIUS shared secret.

To maximize security, you would use GANYMEDE + or IPSec transport mode and isolated VLAN. But for most of us, strong passwords and physical security prevents the RADIUS PAP to a significant weakness.

PIX-Sonicwall Site-to-Site and Cisco VPN Client

I have a firewall 506th PIX with a VPN site-to site for a firewall Sonicwall 330 Pro which works perfectly. I would like to add the functionality of remote users connecting to the network using the client VPN from Cisco PIX. I'm under the question of having only a single card encryption applied to the external interface. I need the feature to have the tunnel between the site to site VPN can be undertaken on other, so I can't use a dynamic encryption card. Does anyone have suggestions or knowledge on how to achieve this?

Thank you.

You don't need to add another card encryption to the external interface. You simply add customer information to your existing card for example:

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac YOURSET

YOURMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

card crypto YOURMAP 10 corresponds to 100 address

card crypto YOURMAP 10 set counterpart x.x.x.x

crypto YOURMAP 10 the transform-set YOURSET value card

set of 10 CUSTOMERS crypto dynamic-map transform-set YOURSET

card crypto YOURMAP 90-isakmp dynamic ipsec CLIENTS

connect Cisco VPN client v5 to asa 5505

I have remote vpn configuration issues between ASA5505 and Cisco VPN client v5. Successfully, I can establish a connection between the client Vpn and ASA and receive the IP address of the ASA. Statistical customer VPN windows shows that packets are sent and encrypted but none of the packages is received/decrypted.

Cannot ping asa 5505

Any ideas on what I missed?

Try adding...

ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto

In addition, you cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA vpn without this command...

management-access inside

Please evaluate the useful messages.

Cisco VPN Client 5.0.0 does not connect

Hello

I am trying to establish the VPN session the firewall to 5525 X Cisco ASA crossing 9.1.1 Cisco VPN Client. Although AnyConnect is the way to go, the inherited method must always be supported for some time as part of a migration. I tried two VPN users (authenticated by ad) on two client computers running Windows 7 64 bit and Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0440. Both users are able to establish a session to a computer at the ASA, but not the other. Entering credentails evil, the login popup will appear immediately. On the combination of username/password correct name, the following VPN client log messages are generated and the session drops that is "not connected" in the status bar. The PCF file is the same on both client computers.

Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.07.0440
Copyright (C) 1998-2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Client Type(s): Windows, WinNT
Running on: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
119    22:49:16.933  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x6300003B
Attempting to establish a connection with 203.99.111.44.
120    22:49:16.939  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
Starting IKE Phase 1 Negotiation
121    22:49:16.942  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
122    22:49:16.973  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
123    22:49:16.973  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, HASH, VID(Unity), VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Nat-T), NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(Frag), VID(?)) from 203.99.111.44
124    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer is a Cisco-Unity compliant peer
125    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports XAUTH
126    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports DPD
127    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports NAT-T
128    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
Peer supports IKE fragmentation payloads
129    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000001
IOS Vendor ID Contruction successful
130    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT, NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(?), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
131    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
132    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000083
IKE Port in use - Local Port =  0xCA7C, Remote Port = 0x1194
133    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000072
Automatic NAT Detection Status:
Remote end is NOT behind a NAT device
This   end IS behind a NAT device
134    22:49:17.000  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
135    22:49:17.000  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
136    22:49:17.211  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700008
IPSec driver successfully started
137    22:49:17.211  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
138    22:49:23.207  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
139    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
140    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
141    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
142    22:49:23.401  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300005E
Client sending a firewall request to concentrator
143    22:49:23.401  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
144    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
145    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
146    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_ADDRESS: , value = 10.2.193.69
147    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(1): , value = 10.2.5.2
148    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(2): , value = 10.1.5.2
149    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SAVEPWD: , value = 0x00000000
150    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SPLIT_INCLUDE (# of split_nets), value = 0x00000001
151    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000F
SPLIT_NET #1
subnet = 10.0.0.0
mask = 255.0.0.0
protocol = 0
src port = 0
dest port=0
152    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000E
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_DEFDOMAIN: , value = example.org
153    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_PFS: , value = 0x00000000
154    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000E
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = APPLICATION_VERSION, value = Cisco Systems, Inc ASA5525 Version 9.1(1) built by builders on Wed 28-Nov-12 11:15 PST
155    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SMARTCARD_REMOVAL_DISCONNECT: , value = 0x00000001
156    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = Received and using NAT-T port number , value = 0x00001194
157    22:49:23.445  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000056
Received a key request from Driver: Local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0
158    22:49:23.445  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK QM *(HASH, SA, NON, ID, ID) to 203.99.111.44
159    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
160    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_RESP_LIFETIME) from 203.99.111.44
161    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000045
RESPONDER-LIFETIME notify has value of 86400 seconds
162    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000047
This SA has already been alive for 7 seconds, setting expiry to 86393 seconds from now
163    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
164    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN) from 203.99.111.44
165    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to 203.99.111.44
166    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000049
Discarding IPsec SA negotiation, MsgID=F3E3C530
167    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000017
Marking IKE SA for deletion  (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
168    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
169    22:49:23.479  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000058
Received an ISAKMP message for a non-active SA, I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65
170    22:49:23.479  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(Dropped) from 203.99.111.44
171    22:49:24.310  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
172    22:49:26.838  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x6300004B
Discarding IKE SA negotiation (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
173    22:49:26.849  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
IKE received signal to terminate VPN connection
174    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
175    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
176    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
Deleted all keys
177    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x6370000A
IPSec driver successfully stopped

Any ideas why the second client of Windows 7 does not work?

Kind regards

Rick.

Rick

Thanks for the additional output. It shows the xauth authentication step, which is good to see. But it does not offer much clarity on what is causing the problem.

My attention is drawn to a couple of message on the balls that are in line with the two sessions for which you posted newspapers.

32 00:36:08.178 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300005E

Customer address a request from firewall to hub

I'm not sure that we see any answer to this, but it makes me wonder if it is somehow involved in the issue. Is it possible that there is a difference in the configuration of firewall and operating between two clients?

I am also interested in this series of posts

48 00:36:08.210 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000056

Received a request from key driver: local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0

I don't know why the pilot requested a key at this point, and I wonder why the remote IP is 0.0.0.0?

It is followed by a package in which the ASA provides the value of the life of SA - which seems to be on the path to a successful connection. that is followed by

55 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F

Received packet of ISAKMP: peer = 203.99.111.44

56 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000014

RECEIVING< isakmp="" oak="" info="" *(hash,="" notify:no_proposal_chosen)="" from="">

during which the SAA indicates that no proposal has been selected. It seems therefore that the ASA is not happy about something.

If we do not find indications of the client that allows to identify the problem, then maybe we look at the ASA. Are all log messages generated on the SAA during this attempt to establish VPN that could show us the problem? Would it not be possible to run debugs on the SAA in a trial of this machine?

HTH

Rick

Cisco vpn client minimized in the taskbar and the rest in status: disconnect

I used 5.0.07.0240 cisco vpn client for 1 month with my pc under windows 7-64 bit. Worked well for 1 month. All of a sudden now when I double click the icon to start, VPN automatically minimizes to the taskbar with the disconnected state. It does not connect the option to hit or anything before it reduced to a minimum. I've not seen this before and no changes... but now it simply doesn't work. All solutions? Windows just patch automatically breaking cisco?
Unfortunately, cisco does not world class technical service... they called but no use.

In my view, there is now a published version of the x 64 client, you need to download.

If you suspect an update of Windows, why not try a system restore for a day, it was

working correctly?

On Wednesday, April 28, 2010 17:27:46 + 0000, akshay2112 wrote:

> I used 5.0.07.0240 cisco vpn client for 1 month with my pc under windows 7-64 bit. Worked well for 1 month. All of a sudden now when I double click the icon to start, VPN automatically minimizes to the taskbar with the disconnected state. It does not connect the option to hit or anything before it reduced to a minimum. I've not seen this before and no changes... but now it simply doesn't work. All solutions? Windows just patch automatically breaking cisco? Unfortunately, cisco does not world class technical service... they called but no use.

Barb Bowman www.digitalmediaphile.com

Cisco VPN Client and 64-Bit OS Support

I'm in the stages of planning/testing of migrating users to the Cisco VPN client. Problem that I came across well is that I can't find a version that supports 64-bit operating systems. I looked through the Download Center with no luck. I'm a little more looking for a version out there? Thanks in advance.

As much as I know there is no 64-bit support and is not yet on the roadmap of IPSEC VPN Client. For more details, see:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/compatibility/ASA-VPN-compatibility.html

Concerning

Farrukh

AnyConnect + possible PSK (pre-shared key) as under with cisco vpn client ikev1 and ikev2

Is it possible to create a VPN Anyconnect of RA with just the name of user and password + pre-shared key (Group) for the connection, as could do for ikev1 with cisco VPN client? I am running 8.4.X ASA code and looks like tunnel-group commands have 8.2.X somewhat change. If you change the group type of the tunnel for remote access, now there is no option for IKEv2 PSK. This is only available when you choose the type

Type of TG_TEST FW1 (config) # tunnel - group?

set up the mode commands/options:
Site IPSec IPSec-l2l group
Remote access using IPSec-IPSec-ra (DEPRECATED) group
remote access remote access (IPSec and WebVPN) group
WebVPN WebVPN Group (DEPRECATED)

FW1(config-tunnel-General) # tunnel - group TG_TEST ipsec-attributes
FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) #?

configuration of the tunnel-group commands:
any required authorization request users to allow successfully in order to
Connect (DEPRECATED)
Allow chain issuing of the certificate
output attribute tunnel-group IPSec configuration
mode
help help for group orders of tunnel configuration
IKEv1 configure IKEv1
ISAKMP policy configure ISAKMP
not to remove a pair of attribute value
by the peer-id-validate Validate identity of the peer using the peer
certificate
negotiation to Enable password update in RADIUS RADIUS with expiry
authentication (DEPRECATED)

FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) # ikev1?

the tunnel-group-ipsec mode commands/options:
pre-shared key associate a key shared in advance with the connection policy

I'm getting old so I hope that it is not in another complaint curmudgeonly on the loss of functionality. :)

Many small businesses do not want to invest in the PKI. It is usually a pain to deploy, backup, make redundant, etc..

But it would be nice to have a bit more security on VPN other than just the connections of username and password.

If this is not possible, it is possible to configure the Anyconnect customer to IKEv1 with PSK and name at the level of the Group client?

If this is not possible, WTH did cisco end customer VPN cisco as a choice of VPN connection (other than to get more fresh mail of license)?

I really hope that something like this exists still!

THX,

WR

You are welcome

In addition to two factors, you can also do double authentication (ie the two using the user name and password). Each set of credentials can come from a Bank of different identities.

With this scheme, you can can configure a local user name (common) with password on the SAA (think of it as your analog PSK) and the other be the AD user identification information.

Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients on a single PC

Hello

I'm in the following fix:

I had used customer Checkpoint SecuRemote 4.1 SP - 5 VPN in the past.

Now, I have installed the Cisco VPN client version 4.0.4 on my PC to access IPSec VPN for the PIX in our headquarters.

According to Cisco VPN release notes http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/rel404/404clnt.htm#wp1346340 , it should be possible to have clients both Cisco and Checkpoint VPN installed on the same machine.

But I am not able to connect to my PIX, I receive the following error message:

"Secure the complete VPN connection locally by the Client.

Reason 403: failed to contact the security gateway. »

When I'm looking for signs of PC control-> system-> hardware-> device Administration-> network cards, I can see Cisco Systems VPN Adapter disabled.

After you activate manually, I always get the same error when you try to connect to the Cisco VPN client.

After PC restart the Cisco VPN adapter is disabled later.

I tried to uncheck Check Point SecuRemote form my Dial-up connection (bypassing CSCea31192 of bug, but the bug does not affect NAT - T connection which I use).

I noticed the same situation on three different computers, one running Windows XP, both running Windows 2000.

After uninstalling the client Checkpoint completely (including Windows registry manual removal), the Cisco VPN client works very well.

It seems to me, therefore, that there is a profound mismatch between Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients.

Does anyone know of a workaround?

Thank you

Milan

We had the same problem with some of our users who need to use the two clients to connect to customer sites.

If I remember the cisco client does not start automatically, but the client of checkpoint 4.1 don't.

We by-passed by deleting the registry entry point control that starts the client at startup. fwenc.exe is the entrance and it is in

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

After that make a shortcut to the executable file that is stored in the directory \bin to relevant checkpoint on the client (it is different from NT & 9 client x) and then only start when it is necessary.

Hope that's a help

Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP VPN Client IPSec to ASA

I configured ASA for IPSec VPN via Cisco VPN Client and XP VPN client communications. I can connect successfully with Cisco VPN Client, but I get an error when connecting with the XP client. Debugging said "misconfigured groups and transport/tunneling mode" I know, they use different methods of transport and tunneling, and I think that I have configured both. Take a look at the config.

PS a funny thing - when I connect with client VPN in Windows Server 2003, I have no error. The only difference is that client XP is behind an ADSL router and client server is directly connected to the Internet on one of its public IP of interfaces. NAT in the case of XP can cause problems?

Config is:

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/2.30

Description remote access

VLAN 30

nameif remote access

security-level 0

IP 85.*. *. 1 255.255.255.0

!

access-list 110 scope ip allow a whole

NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.10 eq ssh

NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.26 eq ssh

access-list extended ip allowed any one sheep

access list nat-ganja extended permit tcp any host 10.254.17.18 eq ssh

sheep-vpn access-list extended permits all ip 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

flow-export destination inside-Bct 192.168.1.27 9996

IP local pool raccess 192.168.121.60 - 192.168.121.120 mask 255.255.255.0

ARP timeout 14400

global (outside-Baku) 1 interface

global (outside-Ganja) interface 2

NAT (inside-Bct) 0 access-list sheep-vpn

NAT (inside-Bct) 1 access list nat

NAT (inside-Bct) 2-nat-ganja access list

Access-group rdp on interface outside-Ganja

!

Access remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.*. *. 1 2

Route outside Baku 10.254.17.24 255.255.255.248 10.254.17.10 1

Route outside Baku 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

Outside-Baku route 192.168.39.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

Route outside-Ganja 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

Route outside-Ganja 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

Route outside-Ganja 192.168.184.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

Route outside Baku 192.168.208.16 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.10 1

Route outside-Ganja 192.168.208.112 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.18 1

dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

Crypto ipsec transform-set newset aes - esp esp-md5-hmac

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac vpnclienttrans

Crypto ipsec transform-set vpnclienttrans transport mode

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac raccess

life crypto ipsec security association seconds 214748364

Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life security-association 214748364

raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

vpnclientmap 30 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

card crypto interface for remote access vpnclientmap

crypto isakmp identity address

ISAKMP crypto enable vpntest

ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Baku

ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Ganja

crypto ISAKMP enable remote access

ISAKMP crypto enable Interior-Bct

crypto ISAKMP policy 30

preshared authentication

3des encryption

md5 hash

Group 2

life 86400

No encryption isakmp nat-traversal

No vpn-addr-assign aaa

Telnet timeout 5

SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 outside Baku

SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 Interior-Bct

internal vpn group policy

attributes of vpn group policy

value of DNS-server 192.168.1.3

Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec

Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel

BCT.AZ value by default-field

attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

raccess address pool

Group-RADIUS authentication server

Group Policy - by default-vpn

IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

pre-shared-key *.

Hello

For the Cisco VPN client, you would need a tunnel-group name configured on the ASA with a pre-shared key.

Please see configuration below:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

or

http://tinyurl.com/5t67hd

Please see the section of tunnel-group config of the SAA.

There is a tunnel-group called "rtptacvpn" and a pre-shared key associated with it. This group name is used by the VPN Client Group name.

So, you would need a specific tunnel-group name configured with a pre-shared key and use it on the Cisco VPN Client.

Secondly, because you are behind a router ADSL, I'm sure that's configured for NAT. can you please activate NAT - T on your ASA.

"crypto isakmp nat-traversal.

Thirdly, change the transformation of the value

raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

Let me know the result.

Thank you

Gilbert

Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

Any ideas why this would happen?

Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

Hello

I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

Can someone help me please?

Thank you

Peter

RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

!

the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

x key

pool vpnclientpool

ACL 190

include-local-lan

!

86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

!

Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

Set transform-set 1cisco

!

card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

set peer x

Set transform-set 1cisco

PFS group2 Set

match address 180

card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

Description $ES_WAN$

card crypto ETH0

!

IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

!

!

overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

!

IP access-list extended LOCAL

deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

!

access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

!

How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

DE:

access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

TO:

access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

DE:

access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

TO:

access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

Hope that helps.

Cisco VPN client v5 and integration Active Directory 2008

Hi all

I need to know if I can integrate Single Sign On for my Cisco VPN Client v.5 with my Active Directory which run on windows 2008

THX in advance

No, unfortunately, Single Sign On is only supported on Clientless SSL VPN (WebVPN), not on the IPSec VPN Client AnyConnect VPN Client.

Cisco VPN client 3.5.1 and Cisco ASA 5.2 (2)

Hello

I have a strange problem about Cisco VPN client (IPSec) with Cisco ASA. The Cisco ASA runs software version 5.2 (2). The Cisco VPN client version is 3.5.1.

The problem is the customer able Cisco VPN to authenticate successfully with Cisco ASA, but could not PING to any LAN behind the Cisco ASA. In any case, the problem disappeared when we used the Cisco VPN version 4.6 or 4.8 of the customer. All parameters are exactly the same. What has happened? What is the cause of this problem? How can I solve this problem?

Please advice.

Thank you

Nitass

I understand your problem, I never used 3.5.1 so I thought that maybe nat - t is not enabled by default as 4.x.

Multicast and cisco VPN client

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for