PIX-Sonicwall Site-to-Site and Cisco VPN Client

I have a firewall 506th PIX with a VPN site-to site for a firewall Sonicwall 330 Pro which works perfectly. I would like to add the functionality of remote users connecting to the network using the client VPN from Cisco PIX. I'm under the question of having only a single card encryption applied to the external interface. I need the feature to have the tunnel between the site to site VPN can be undertaken on other, so I can't use a dynamic encryption card. Does anyone have suggestions or knowledge on how to achieve this?

Thank you.

You don't need to add another card encryption to the external interface. You simply add customer information to your existing card for example:

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac YOURSET

YOURMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

card crypto YOURMAP 10 corresponds to 100 address

card crypto YOURMAP 10 set counterpart x.x.x.x

crypto YOURMAP 10 the transform-set YOURSET value card

set of 10 CUSTOMERS crypto dynamic-map transform-set YOURSET

card crypto YOURMAP 90-isakmp dynamic ipsec CLIENTS

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • SafeNet and Cisco VPN Client Compatible?

    I have been using the Cisco VPN for quite awhile with no problems. Recently, we have added a Watchguard Firebox somewhere else and have installed the Client of Watchguard MUVPN, otherwise known as a customer of Safenet.

    Since the installation, I could not yet properly use the Cisco Client. If I disable the two Services of Safenet, I invited to my user id and password and connect to the Cisco Concentrator and get an ip, etc. However, I can't ping anything on the network.

    My solution is to completely uninstall both clients and reinstall the Cisco by itself. This is not very practical.

    If anyone know a fix for this I'd appreciate comments.

    Thank you

    Patrick Dunnigan

    Hi Patrick,

    I only got lucky with the SafeNet customer brand Watchguard with the 4.0.x releases of the Cisco client. I think Cisco 4.6 clients use a newer driver from the DNE or else that plays well with SafeNet.

    In any case, here's how to set up PC that requires both clients:

    First, install the Cisco VPN client. Restart the application, and then stop and disable the Windows service.

    Install the client for Watchguard, reboot as requested.

    Then, stop and set to manual both SafeNet services, then start and set to automatic the Cisco service.

    Delete the shortcut in your Start menu Startup group safecfg.exe (or the key of HKLM\MS\Windows\CurrentVer\Run, where he gets set.)

    Delete the shortcut to start for the Cisco VPN client as well.

    Whenever you want to use the Cisco customer, you can just launch the Dialer to IPSec. If you want to run the SafeNet client, stop the Cisco service, start the services of SafeNet, then run safecfg.exe. A few batch files facilitate this process for users.

    Hope that helps,

    Chris

  • MS RADIUS and Cisco VPN client

    We currently have with a Server Windows RAS and IAS authentication with PPTP to users.

    I want to move a hub (we have two not used) and the use of the Cisco VPN client with IPSEC 3005, also using the RADIUS (IAS) in Windows to authenticate against Active Directory.

    I have a config to work for the client and it performs authentication, but I'm afraid that you can't configure IAS to work with IPSEC, unless you configure the policy for

    "Unencrypted authentication (PAP, SPAP).

    on the Authentication tab

    and

    "No encryption".

    on the encryption tab.

    Are encrypted with IPSEC credentials to establish the tunnel of the Cisco VPN client?

    For RADIUS PAP authentication, the user name is clear and the password is encrypted with the RADIUS shared secret.

    To maximize security, you would use GANYMEDE + or IPSec transport mode and isolated VLAN. But for most of us, strong passwords and physical security prevents the RADIUS PAP to a significant weakness.

  • Multicast and cisco VPN client

    I have an XP PC which is on a remote site, I need to connect to my corporate network through the VPN client. This PC has 2 cards NIC - one for a private LAN, which receives the data via multicast, and a public LAN, which will be used for the VPN.

    When I connect the VPN, multicast reception stops. Is it possible to activate on the second NIC card (private)?

    Can you go into the network card properties, disable / uncheck deterministic Network Enhancer and see if that makes a difference?

  • Cisco VPN Client causes a blue screen crash on Windows XP Pro (Satellite M30)

    Hello

    I have a Satellite Pro M30 running Windows XP Professional.

    After you start a vpn Tunnel via a customer of Cisco VPN (Version 4.6 and 4.7), the system crashes with a blue screen.

    I see that the key exchange is successful, but immediately after the vpn connection is established Windows XP crashes with a blue screen.

    Someone has any idea how to solve this problem?

    Perhaps by the updated device driver? And if so, which driver should be updated?

    Kind regards

    Thorsten

    Hello

    Well, it seems that the Cisco client is a problem.
    I m unaware of this product because it of not designed by Toshiba.
    I think that the drivers are not compatible with the Windows operating system.
    However, I found this site troubleshooting cisco vpn client:
    Please check this:
    http://www.CITES.uiuc.edu/wireless/trouble-index.html

  • connect Cisco VPN client v5 to asa 5505

    I have remote vpn configuration issues between ASA5505 and Cisco VPN client v5. Successfully, I can establish a connection between the client Vpn and ASA and receive the IP address of the ASA. Statistical customer VPN windows shows that packets are sent and encrypted but none of the packages is received/decrypted.

    Cannot ping asa 5505

    Any ideas on what I missed?

    Try adding...

    ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto

    In addition, you cannot ping the inside interface of the ASA vpn without this command...

    management-access inside

    Please evaluate the useful messages.

  • Cisco VPN Client 5.0.0 does not connect

    Hello

    I am trying to establish the VPN session the firewall to 5525 X Cisco ASA crossing 9.1.1 Cisco VPN Client. Although AnyConnect is the way to go, the inherited method must always be supported for some time as part of a migration. I tried two VPN users (authenticated by ad) on two client computers running Windows 7 64 bit and Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0440. Both users are able to establish a session to a computer at the ASA, but not the other. Entering credentails evil, the login popup will appear immediately. On the combination of username/password correct name, the following VPN client log messages are generated and the session drops that is "not connected" in the status bar. The PCF file is the same on both client computers.

    Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.07.0440
    

    Copyright (C) 1998-2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    

    Client Type(s): Windows, WinNT
    

    Running on: 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
    

    119    22:49:16.933  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x6300003B
    

    Attempting to establish a connection with 203.99.111.44.
    

    120    22:49:16.939  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Starting IKE Phase 1 Negotiation
    

    121    22:49:16.942  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
    

    122    22:49:16.973  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    123    22:49:16.973  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NON, ID, HASH, VID(Unity), VID(Xauth), VID(dpd), VID(Nat-T), NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(Frag), VID(?)) from 203.99.111.44
    

    124    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Peer is a Cisco-Unity compliant peer
    

    125    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Peer supports XAUTH
    

    126    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Peer supports DPD
    

    127    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Peer supports NAT-T
    

    128    22:49:16.974  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000001
    

    Peer supports IKE fragmentation payloads
    

    129    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000001
    

    IOS Vendor ID Contruction successful
    

    130    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK AG *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_INITIAL_CONTACT, NAT-D, NAT-D, VID(?), VID(Unity)) to 203.99.111.44
    

    131    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/6          IKE/0x63000055
    

    Sent a keepalive on the IPSec SA
    

    132    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000083
    

    IKE Port in use - Local Port =  0xCA7C, Remote Port = 0x1194
    

    133    22:49:16.977  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000072
    

    Automatic NAT Detection Status:
    

    Remote end is NOT behind a NAT device
    

    This   end IS behind a NAT device
    

    134    22:49:17.000  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    135    22:49:17.000  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
    

    136    22:49:17.211  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700008
    

    IPSec driver successfully started
    

    137    22:49:17.211  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
    

    Deleted all keys
    

    138    22:49:23.207  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
    

    139    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    140    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
    

    141    22:49:23.393  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
    

    142    22:49:23.401  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300005E
    

    Client sending a firewall request to concentrator
    

    143    22:49:23.401  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) to 203.99.111.44
    

    144    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    145    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK TRANS *(HASH, ATTR) from 203.99.111.44
    

    146    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_ADDRESS: , value = 10.2.193.69
    

    147    22:49:23.427  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(1): , value = 10.2.5.2
    

    148    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000010
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = INTERNAL_IPV4_DNS(2): , value = 10.1.5.2
    

    149    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SAVEPWD: , value = 0x00000000
    

    150    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SPLIT_INCLUDE (# of split_nets), value = 0x00000001
    

    151    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000F
    

    SPLIT_NET #1
    

    subnet = 10.0.0.0
    

    mask = 255.0.0.0
    

    protocol = 0
    

    src port = 0
    

    dest port=0
    

    152    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000E
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_DEFDOMAIN: , value = example.org
    

    153    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_PFS: , value = 0x00000000
    

    154    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000E
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = APPLICATION_VERSION, value = Cisco Systems, Inc ASA5525 Version 9.1(1) built by builders on Wed 28-Nov-12 11:15 PST
    

    155    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = MODECFG_UNITY_SMARTCARD_REMOVAL_DISCONNECT: , value = 0x00000001
    

    156    22:49:23.428  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300000D
    

    MODE_CFG_REPLY: Attribute = Received and using NAT-T port number , value = 0x00001194
    

    157    22:49:23.445  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000056
    

    Received a key request from Driver: Local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0
    

    158    22:49:23.445  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK QM *(HASH, SA, NON, ID, ID) to 203.99.111.44
    

    159    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    160    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:STATUS_RESP_LIFETIME) from 203.99.111.44
    

    161    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000045
    

    RESPONDER-LIFETIME notify has value of 86400 seconds
    

    162    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x63000047
    

    This SA has already been alive for 7 seconds, setting expiry to 86393 seconds from now
    

    163    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    164    22:49:23.477  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, NOTIFY:NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN) from 203.99.111.44
    

    165    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000013
    

    SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to 203.99.111.44
    

    166    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000049
    

    Discarding IPsec SA negotiation, MsgID=F3E3C530
    

    167    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000017
    

    Marking IKE SA for deletion  (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
    

    168    22:49:23.478  06/23/13  Sev=Info/5          IKE/0x6300002F
    

    Received ISAKMP packet: peer = 203.99.111.44
    

    169    22:49:23.479  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000058
    

    Received an ISAKMP message for a non-active SA, I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65
    

    170    22:49:23.479  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000014
    

    RECEIVING <<< ISAKMP OAK INFO *(Dropped) from 203.99.111.44
    

    171    22:49:24.310  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
    

    Deleted all keys
    

    172    22:49:26.838  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x6300004B
    

    Discarding IKE SA negotiation (I_Cookie=CD65262E1C3808E4 R_Cookie=912AE160ADADEE65) reason = DEL_REASON_IKE_NEG_FAILED
    

    173    22:49:26.849  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IKE/0x63000001
    

    IKE received signal to terminate VPN connection
    

    174    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
    

    Deleted all keys
    

    175    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
    

    Deleted all keys
    

    176    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x63700014
    

    Deleted all keys
    

    177    22:49:26.855  06/23/13  Sev=Info/4          IPSEC/0x6370000A
    

    IPSec driver successfully stopped

    Any ideas why the second client of Windows 7 does not work?

    Kind regards

    Rick.

    Rick

    Thanks for the additional output. It shows the xauth authentication step, which is good to see. But it does not offer much clarity on what is causing the problem.

    My attention is drawn to a couple of message on the balls that are in line with the two sessions for which you posted newspapers.

    32 00:36:08.178 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300005E

    Customer address a request from firewall to hub

    I'm not sure that we see any answer to this, but it makes me wonder if it is somehow involved in the issue. Is it possible that there is a difference in the configuration of firewall and operating between two clients?

    I am also interested in this series of posts

    48 00:36:08.210 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000056

    Received a request from key driver: local IP = 10.2.193.69, GW IP = 203.99.111.44, Remote IP = 0.0.0.0

    I don't know why the pilot requested a key at this point, and I wonder why the remote IP is 0.0.0.0?

    It is followed by a package in which the ASA provides the value of the life of SA - which seems to be on the path to a successful connection. that is followed by

    55 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/5 IKE/0x6300002F

    Received packet of ISAKMP: peer = 203.99.111.44

    56 00:36:08.350 24/06/13 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000014

    RECEIVING< isakmp="" oak="" info="" *(hash,="" notify:no_proposal_chosen)="" from="">

    during which the SAA indicates that no proposal has been selected. It seems therefore that the ASA is not happy about something.

    If we do not find indications of the client that allows to identify the problem, then maybe we look at the ASA. Are all log messages generated on the SAA during this attempt to establish VPN that could show us the problem? Would it not be possible to run debugs on the SAA in a trial of this machine?

    HTH

    Rick

  • IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

    Hello

    I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

    The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

    There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

    Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

    Can someone help me please?

    Thank you

    Peter

    RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

    Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    BA 3des

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

    !

    the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

    x key

    pool vpnclientpool

    ACL 190

    include-local-lan

    !

    86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

    !

    Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

    Set transform-set 1cisco

    !

    card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

    card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

    client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

    ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    set peer x

    Set transform-set 1cisco

    PFS group2 Set

    match address 180

    card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

    !

    !

    interface FastEthernet0/1

    Description $ES_WAN$

    card crypto ETH0

    !

    IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

    !

    !

    overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

    !

    IP access-list extended LOCAL

    deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

    !

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    !

    How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

    Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

    DE:

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    TO:

    access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

    Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

    DE:

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

    TO:

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

    access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

    Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

    Hope that helps.

  • PIX from Site to Site w / remote VPN Clients

    I posted accidentally this question in the wrong forum earlier today. I couldn't find a way to move it or delete it, so I apologize for the duplication.

    I set up a VPN site-to site between 2 Pix 506e. I have install the tunnle VPN using the VPN Wizard, and it seems to work fine.

    However, I also have users that VPN directly in the PIX via PPTP or a Cisco VPN client. These users are not able to access resources that are on the other end of the VPN tunnel. It seems that map ACL that triggers sending in the tunnel of the packages is not be matched, but I was not able to understand how to make this work correctly.

    PIX has a local subnet of 192.168.1.x/24. PIX B has a local subnet of 192.168.2.x/24. Traffic between these 2 subnets through the tunnel flow. However, when a person sets up a VPN on PIX B, they are also placed in the 192.168.2.x/24 subnet, but they are unable to access anything whatsoever in the 192.168.1.x/24 subnet. Is something like this? Config PIX B is attached. 

Any help you could offer would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you

    -Steve

    This is not possible with Pix and 6.3 version of the code.

    If you are running 7.0 or higher on the Pix, so, yes it is possible. Please see the below URL for more configuration information. The feature you're looking for is called 'intra-interface.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

    In addition, 7.0 and above are not supported on Pix 501, 506, and 520.

    Kind regards

    Arul

    * Please note all useful messages *.

  • Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

    Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

    The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

    Any ideas why this would happen?

    Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

    Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

    Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

  • Cisco VPN client + VPN site-to-site

    Hi all

    I have two ASA5505 with a site to site VPN.

    One of the ASA is connected to the internal network 192.168.150.0.

    It is connected to 192.168.151.0.

    I also configured IPSec Cisco VPN client that is connected to 192.168.150.0.

    I would like to know if it is possible for a connected with the Cisco VPN client to access the 192.168.151.0 by the site-to-site VPN network.

    Thank you!

    Hello

    If you mean that the IP addresses of the VPN Pool are something like 192.168.150.x then I suggest to use a totally different network than those used on LANs.

    At the software level 9.1 basically causes changes to how are the NAT0 configurations.

    MAIN SITE

    network of the VPN-POOL object

    subnet x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

    being REMOTE-LAN network

    192.168.151.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    destination of static NAT VPN VPN-POOL POOL (outdoors, outdoor) static REMOTE - LAN LAN

    REMOTE SITE

    network of the VPN-POOL object

    subnet x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

    the object of the LAN network

    192.168.151.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

    NAT static destination LAN LAN (indoor, outdoor) static source VPN-VPN-POOL

    Otherwise, I would imagine that the same kind of configurations above apply. You need the ' same-security-movement ' command to allow the 'outside' to ' outside ' of the movement. You will have to ensure that the ACL from Tunnel Split contains the remote site network. And of course, you should make sure that the ACL crypto sets / include traffic between VPN pool and the network 192.168.151.0/24 on both sides ASAs.

    -Jouni

  • Site to Site and Site to the VPN Client

    Hi all

    I have installed VPN Site to Site that works very well. then set up the Site to the VPN Client, which also worked well, but the VPN Site to Site offline. If I take off after 3 lines on the Site to the Client VPN Site to Site VPN start working.

    card crypto client vpn authentication list vpnuser

    card crypto vpn isakmp authorization list groupauthor

    card crypto vpn client configuration address respond

    Here is my Config complete. Please suggest.

    crypto ISAKMP policy 9

    BA 3des

    preshared authentication

    Group 2

    ISAKMP crypto key Cisco address 203.13.x.x

    !

    ISAKMP crypto client configuration group vpnclient

    key cisco123

    DNS 192.168.10.15

    domain ic.com

    pool ippool

    !

    86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac CISCOSET

    !

    Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

    game of transformation-CISCOSET

    !

    !

    !

    card crypto client vpn authentication list vpnuser

    card crypto vpn isakmp authorization list groupauthor

    card crypto vpn client configuration address respond

    card crypto ipsec vpn 1 isakmp

    the value of 203.13.x.x peer

    game of transformation-CISCOSET

    match the address acl_ncsvpn

    Map 10-isakmp ipsec vpn crypto dynamic dynmap

    local pool IP 10.10.10.1 ippool 10.10.10.10

    acl_internet extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255

    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything

    acl_natisp1 extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything

    acl_natisp2 extended IP access list

    deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything

    acl_ncsvpn extended IP access list

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255

    acl_vpn extended IP access list

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

    IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255



    Please try the following command

    ISAKMP crypto key Cisco address 203.13.x.x No.-xauth

    and then give it a try

  • multi-site VPN with just the cisco vpn client

    Hello everyone

    Please I need your help.

    We have a headquarters office and up to 60 is BranchOffice, we want to create VPN network between its. so let's deploy 2 router cisco esy vpn server with HA (HSRP) at the Headquarters Office and all branches have Connection ADSL and they will use just the cisco vpn client to connect to the Headquarters Office.

    My question is: is it possible to do it just with the client vpn cisco without purchased for any exercise bracnh a cisco router to create an ipsec tunnel because it is so expensive?

    It depends on if the routers to offices can handle NAT with several internal VPN clients to 1 IP address. Most of the new material should be fine. Keep in mind the maximum limit of the VPN client, with 60 agencies and 5 people each of whom you are above the limit.

    Michael

    Please note all useful posts

  • Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients on a single PC

    Hello

    I'm in the following fix:

    I had used customer Checkpoint SecuRemote 4.1 SP - 5 VPN in the past.

    Now, I have installed the Cisco VPN client version 4.0.4 on my PC to access IPSec VPN for the PIX in our headquarters.

    According to Cisco VPN release notes http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/rel404/404clnt.htm#wp1346340 , it should be possible to have clients both Cisco and Checkpoint VPN installed on the same machine.

    But I am not able to connect to my PIX, I receive the following error message:

    "Secure the complete VPN connection locally by the Client.

    Reason 403: failed to contact the security gateway. »

    When I'm looking for signs of PC control-> system-> hardware-> device Administration-> network cards, I can see Cisco Systems VPN Adapter disabled.

    After you activate manually, I always get the same error when you try to connect to the Cisco VPN client.

    After PC restart the Cisco VPN adapter is disabled later.

    I tried to uncheck Check Point SecuRemote form my Dial-up connection (bypassing CSCea31192 of bug, but the bug does not affect NAT - T connection which I use).

    I noticed the same situation on three different computers, one running Windows XP, both running Windows 2000.

    After uninstalling the client Checkpoint completely (including Windows registry manual removal), the Cisco VPN client works very well.

    It seems to me, therefore, that there is a profound mismatch between Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients.

    Does anyone know of a workaround?

    Thank you

    Milan

    We had the same problem with some of our users who need to use the two clients to connect to customer sites.

    If I remember the cisco client does not start automatically, but the client of checkpoint 4.1 don't.

    We by-passed by deleting the registry entry point control that starts the client at startup. fwenc.exe is the entrance and it is in

    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

    After that make a shortcut to the executable file that is stored in the directory \bin to relevant checkpoint on the client (it is different from NT & 9 client x) and then only start when it is necessary.

    Hope that's a help

  • AnyConnect + possible PSK (pre-shared key) as under with cisco vpn client ikev1 and ikev2

    Is it possible to create a VPN Anyconnect of RA with just the name of user and password + pre-shared key (Group) for the connection, as could do for ikev1 with cisco VPN client? I am running 8.4.X ASA code and looks like tunnel-group commands have 8.2.X somewhat change. If you change the group type of the tunnel for remote access, now there is no option for IKEv2 PSK. This is only available when you choose the type

    Type of TG_TEST FW1 (config) # tunnel - group?

    set up the mode commands/options:
    Site IPSec IPSec-l2l group
    Remote access using IPSec-IPSec-ra (DEPRECATED) group
    remote access remote access (IPSec and WebVPN) group
    WebVPN WebVPN Group (DEPRECATED)

    FW1(config-tunnel-General) # tunnel - group TG_TEST ipsec-attributes
    FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) #?

    configuration of the tunnel-group commands:
    any required authorization request users to allow successfully in order to
    Connect (DEPRECATED)
    Allow chain issuing of the certificate
    output attribute tunnel-group IPSec configuration
    mode
    help help for group orders of tunnel configuration
    IKEv1 configure IKEv1
    ISAKMP policy configure ISAKMP
    not to remove a pair of attribute value
    by the peer-id-validate Validate identity of the peer using the peer
    certificate
    negotiation to Enable password update in RADIUS RADIUS with expiry
    authentication (DEPRECATED)

    FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) # ikev1?

    the tunnel-group-ipsec mode commands/options:
    pre-shared key associate a key shared in advance with the connection policy

    I'm getting old so I hope that it is not in another complaint curmudgeonly on the loss of functionality. :)

    Many small businesses do not want to invest in the PKI. It is usually a pain to deploy, backup, make redundant, etc..

    But it would be nice to have a bit more security on VPN other than just the connections of username and password.

    If this is not possible, it is possible to configure the Anyconnect customer to IKEv1 with PSK and name at the level of the Group client?

    If this is not possible, WTH did cisco end customer VPN cisco as a choice of VPN connection (other than to get more fresh mail of license)?

    I really hope that something like this exists still!

    THX,

    WR

    You are welcome

    In addition to two factors, you can also do double authentication (ie the two using the user name and password). Each set of credentials can come from a Bank of different identities.

    With this scheme, you can can configure a local user name (common) with password on the SAA (think of it as your analog PSK) and the other be the AD user identification information.

Maybe you are looking for