Cisco VPN client v5 and integration Active Directory 2008

Similar Questions

• Cisco VPN Client to authenticate to Active Directory

  IOS version: c180x-advipservicesk9 - mz.124 - 24.T4.bin

  VPN Client version: 5.0.07.0410

  I want to authenticate our users against AD when they connect through the VPN. Is this possible on a router in 1801?

  Try this please:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949ba.shtml

• AnyConnect + possible PSK (pre-shared key) as under with cisco vpn client ikev1 and ikev2

  Is it possible to create a VPN Anyconnect of RA with just the name of user and password + pre-shared key (Group) for the connection, as could do for ikev1 with cisco VPN client? I am running 8.4.X ASA code and looks like tunnel-group commands have 8.2.X somewhat change. If you change the group type of the tunnel for remote access, now there is no option for IKEv2 PSK. This is only available when you choose the type

  Type of TG_TEST FW1 (config) # tunnel - group?

  set up the mode commands/options:
  Site IPSec IPSec-l2l group
  Remote access using IPSec-IPSec-ra (DEPRECATED) group
  remote access remote access (IPSec and WebVPN) group
  WebVPN WebVPN Group (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-General) # tunnel - group TG_TEST ipsec-attributes
  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) #?

  configuration of the tunnel-group commands:
  any required authorization request users to allow successfully in order to
  Connect (DEPRECATED)
  Allow chain issuing of the certificate
  output attribute tunnel-group IPSec configuration
  mode
  help help for group orders of tunnel configuration
  IKEv1 configure IKEv1
  ISAKMP policy configure ISAKMP
  not to remove a pair of attribute value
  by the peer-id-validate Validate identity of the peer using the peer
  certificate
  negotiation to Enable password update in RADIUS RADIUS with expiry
  authentication (DEPRECATED)

  FW1(config-tunnel-IPSec) # ikev1?

  the tunnel-group-ipsec mode commands/options:
  pre-shared key associate a key shared in advance with the connection policy

  I'm getting old so I hope that it is not in another complaint curmudgeonly on the loss of functionality. :)

  Many small businesses do not want to invest in the PKI. It is usually a pain to deploy, backup, make redundant, etc..

  But it would be nice to have a bit more security on VPN other than just the connections of username and password.

  If this is not possible, it is possible to configure the Anyconnect customer to IKEv1 with PSK and name at the level of the Group client?

  If this is not possible, WTH did cisco end customer VPN cisco as a choice of VPN connection (other than to get more fresh mail of license)?

  I really hope that something like this exists still!

  THX,

  WR

  You are welcome

  In addition to two factors, you can also do double authentication (ie the two using the user name and password). Each set of credentials can come from a Bank of different identities.

  With this scheme, you can can configure a local user name (common) with password on the SAA (think of it as your analog PSK) and the other be the AD user identification information.

• Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

  Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

  The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

  Any ideas why this would happen?

  Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

  Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

  Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

• MS RADIUS and Cisco VPN client

  We currently have with a Server Windows RAS and IAS authentication with PPTP to users.

  I want to move a hub (we have two not used) and the use of the Cisco VPN client with IPSEC 3005, also using the RADIUS (IAS) in Windows to authenticate against Active Directory.

  I have a config to work for the client and it performs authentication, but I'm afraid that you can't configure IAS to work with IPSEC, unless you configure the policy for

  "Unencrypted authentication (PAP, SPAP).

  on the Authentication tab

  and

  "No encryption".

  on the encryption tab.

  Are encrypted with IPSEC credentials to establish the tunnel of the Cisco VPN client?

  For RADIUS PAP authentication, the user name is clear and the password is encrypted with the RADIUS shared secret.

  To maximize security, you would use GANYMEDE + or IPSec transport mode and isolated VLAN. But for most of us, strong passwords and physical security prevents the RADIUS PAP to a significant weakness.

• Cisco vpn client minimized in the taskbar and the rest in status: disconnect

  I used 5.0.07.0240 cisco vpn client for 1 month with my pc under windows 7-64 bit. Worked well for 1 month. All of a sudden now when I double click the icon to start, VPN automatically minimizes to the taskbar with the disconnected state. It does not connect the option to hit or anything before it reduced to a minimum. I've not seen this before and no changes... but now it simply doesn't work. All solutions? Windows just patch automatically breaking cisco?
  Unfortunately, cisco does not world class technical service... they called but no use.

  In my view, there is now a published version of the x 64 client, you need to download.
  If you suspect an update of Windows, why not try a system restore for a day, it was
  working correctly?
   
  On Wednesday, April 28, 2010 17:27:46 + 0000, akshay2112 wrote:
   
  > I used 5.0.07.0240 cisco vpn client for 1 month with my pc under windows 7-64 bit. Worked well for 1 month. All of a sudden now when I double click the icon to start, VPN automatically minimizes to the taskbar with the disconnected state. It does not connect the option to hit or anything before it reduced to a minimum. I've not seen this before and no changes... but now it simply doesn't work. All solutions? Windows just patch automatically breaking cisco? Unfortunately, cisco does not world class technical service... they called but no use.
   

  Barb Bowman www.digitalmediaphile.com

• Cisco VPN Client and 64-Bit OS Support

  I'm in the stages of planning/testing of migrating users to the Cisco VPN client. Problem that I came across well is that I can't find a version that supports 64-bit operating systems. I looked through the Download Center with no luck. I'm a little more looking for a version out there? Thanks in advance.

  As much as I know there is no 64-bit support and is not yet on the roadmap of IPSEC VPN Client. For more details, see:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/compatibility/ASA-VPN-compatibility.html

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• SafeNet and Cisco VPN Client Compatible?

  I have been using the Cisco VPN for quite awhile with no problems. Recently, we have added a Watchguard Firebox somewhere else and have installed the Client of Watchguard MUVPN, otherwise known as a customer of Safenet.

  Since the installation, I could not yet properly use the Cisco Client. If I disable the two Services of Safenet, I invited to my user id and password and connect to the Cisco Concentrator and get an ip, etc. However, I can't ping anything on the network.

  My solution is to completely uninstall both clients and reinstall the Cisco by itself. This is not very practical.

  If anyone know a fix for this I'd appreciate comments.

  Thank you

  Patrick Dunnigan

  Hi Patrick,

  I only got lucky with the SafeNet customer brand Watchguard with the 4.0.x releases of the Cisco client. I think Cisco 4.6 clients use a newer driver from the DNE or else that plays well with SafeNet.

  In any case, here's how to set up PC that requires both clients:

  First, install the Cisco VPN client. Restart the application, and then stop and disable the Windows service.

  Install the client for Watchguard, reboot as requested.

  Then, stop and set to manual both SafeNet services, then start and set to automatic the Cisco service.

  Delete the shortcut in your Start menu Startup group safecfg.exe (or the key of HKLM\MS\Windows\CurrentVer\Run, where he gets set.)

  Delete the shortcut to start for the Cisco VPN client as well.

  Whenever you want to use the Cisco customer, you can just launch the Dialer to IPSec. If you want to run the SafeNet client, stop the Cisco service, start the services of SafeNet, then run safecfg.exe. A few batch files facilitate this process for users.

  Hope that helps,

  Chris

• Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP VPN Client IPSec to ASA

  I configured ASA for IPSec VPN via Cisco VPN Client and XP VPN client communications. I can connect successfully with Cisco VPN Client, but I get an error when connecting with the XP client. Debugging said "misconfigured groups and transport/tunneling mode" I know, they use different methods of transport and tunneling, and I think that I have configured both. Take a look at the config.

  PS a funny thing - when I connect with client VPN in Windows Server 2003, I have no error. The only difference is that client XP is behind an ADSL router and client server is directly connected to the Internet on one of its public IP of interfaces. NAT in the case of XP can cause problems?

  Config is:

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2.30

  Description remote access

  VLAN 30

  nameif remote access

  security-level 0

  IP 85.*. *. 1 255.255.255.0

  !

  access-list 110 scope ip allow a whole

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.10 eq ssh

  NAT list extended access permit tcp any host 10.254.17.26 eq ssh

  access-list extended ip allowed any one sheep

  access list nat-ganja extended permit tcp any host 10.254.17.18 eq ssh

  sheep-vpn access-list extended permits all ip 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.121.0 255.255.255.0

  flow-export destination inside-Bct 192.168.1.27 9996

  IP local pool raccess 192.168.121.60 - 192.168.121.120 mask 255.255.255.0

  ARP timeout 14400

  global (outside-Baku) 1 interface

  global (outside-Ganja) interface 2

  NAT (inside-Bct) 0 access-list sheep-vpn

  NAT (inside-Bct) 1 access list nat

  NAT (inside-Bct) 2-nat-ganja access list

  Access-group rdp on interface outside-Ganja

  !

  Access remote 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 85.*. *. 1 2

  Route outside Baku 10.254.17.24 255.255.255.248 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside Baku 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Outside-Baku route 192.168.39.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.45.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.69.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.184.0 255.255.255.0 10.254.17.18 1

  Route outside Baku 192.168.208.16 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.10 1

  Route outside-Ganja 192.168.208.112 255.255.255.240 10.254.17.18 1

  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT

  Crypto ipsec transform-set newset aes - esp esp-md5-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac vpnclienttrans

  Crypto ipsec transform-set vpnclienttrans transport mode

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac raccess

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 214748364

  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life security-association 214748364

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  vpnclientmap 30 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

  card crypto interface for remote access vpnclientmap

  crypto isakmp identity address

  ISAKMP crypto enable vpntest

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Baku

  ISAKMP crypto enable outside-Ganja

  crypto ISAKMP enable remote access

  ISAKMP crypto enable Interior-Bct

  crypto ISAKMP policy 30

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  No encryption isakmp nat-traversal

  No vpn-addr-assign aaa

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside Baku

  SSH 10.254.17.26 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.18 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 10.254.17.10 255.255.255.255 outside-Ganja

  SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.192 Interior-Bct

  internal vpn group policy

  attributes of vpn group policy

  value of DNS-server 192.168.1.3

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel

  BCT.AZ value by default-field

  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  raccess address pool

  Group-RADIUS authentication server

  Group Policy - by default-vpn

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup

  pre-shared-key *.

  Hello

  For the Cisco VPN client, you would need a tunnel-group name configured on the ASA with a pre-shared key.

  Please see configuration below:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  or

  http://tinyurl.com/5t67hd

  Please see the section of tunnel-group config of the SAA.

  There is a tunnel-group called "rtptacvpn" and a pre-shared key associated with it. This group name is used by the VPN Client Group name.

  So, you would need a specific tunnel-group name configured with a pre-shared key and use it on the Cisco VPN Client.

  Secondly, because you are behind a router ADSL, I'm sure that's configured for NAT. can you please activate NAT - T on your ASA.

  "crypto isakmp nat-traversal.

  Thirdly, change the transformation of the value

  raccess 1 set transform-set vpnclienttrans crypto dyn1 dynamic-map

  Let me know the result.

  Thank you

  Gilbert

• IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

  Hello

  I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

  The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

  There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

  Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

  Can someone help me please?

  Thank you

  Peter

  RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

  Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

  !

  the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

  x key

  pool vpnclientpool

  ACL 190

  include-local-lan

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  !

  card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

  client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

  ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set peer x

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 180

  card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description $ES_WAN$

  card crypto ETH0

  !

  IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

  !

  !

  overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

  !

  IP access-list extended LOCAL

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

  Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

  DE:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

  DE:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

  Hope that helps.

• Cisco VPN client 3.5.1 and Cisco ASA 5.2 (2)

  Hello

  I have a strange problem about Cisco VPN client (IPSec) with Cisco ASA. The Cisco ASA runs software version 5.2 (2). The Cisco VPN client version is 3.5.1.

  The problem is the customer able Cisco VPN to authenticate successfully with Cisco ASA, but could not PING to any LAN behind the Cisco ASA. In any case, the problem disappeared when we used the Cisco VPN version 4.6 or 4.8 of the customer. All parameters are exactly the same. What has happened? What is the cause of this problem? How can I solve this problem?

  Please advice.

  Thank you

  Nitass

  I understand your problem, I never used 3.5.1 so I thought that maybe nat - t is not enabled by default as 4.x.

• Help, please! Microsoft Vs Cisco VPN Client VPN

  Could someone please indicate if the Cisco VPN Client is safer than the VPN integrated Microsoft on windows XP? If the Cisco client is more secure than why? Microsoft it does not use IPSEC and PPTP right?

  Please advise - very urgent!

  I don't know a customer Cisco Cisco VPN concentrator is safer, but I'm not sure exactly why.

  Carlton,

  Take a deeper look at the same time, all your questions will be answered once you look at these links.

  IPSec is a Cisco VPN standard, open customer or any customer VPN IPSec based should meet these standards. You'll learn more by reading these few bellow of links at the end of the reading you will be to have a better

  perspective on the customer you would gear more to use as a professional network.

  Personally, I've been away little by little PPTP and substituting Cisco VPN clients. Don't get me wrong, PPTP is still widely used there, but it is more vulnerable.

  With Ipsec VPN, you have a wider choice of authentication algorithms, to base

  granularity of ciphers as a way to implement a secure VPN extreamely for RA architecture

  Introduction to IPsec

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094203.shtml

  Introduction to PPTP/L2TP

  http://www.Clavister.com/manuals/ver8.6x/manual/VPN/pptp_basics.htm

  Analysis of vulnerabilities and implementation MS PPTP

  http://www.Schneier.com/paper-PPTP.html

  http://www.Schneier.com/paper-PPTP.PDF

  Alternative workaround to use client MS using L2TP over Ipsec

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807213a7.shtml

  In addition, you can do a google search on "hacking PPTP" or "Ipsec" to preview more vulnerabilities.

  Rgds

  Jorge

• All necessary licenses on ASA 5510 for old Cisco VPN Client

  We're trying to migrate our firewall Watchguard to a Cisco ASA 5510, who bought some time ago. For some reason, all of our users have already installed the old Cisco VPN client. I think it will work. Are there licensing issues on the 5510 I had to be concerned with?  No matter what special config that needs to be done on the 5510?

  Fix. You don't require licensing of AnyConnect of any type of configuration and the use of IKEv1 IPsec remote access VPN (which use the old Cisco VPN client).

  You will be limited to 250 active IPsec peers (remote access more no matter what VPN site-to-site) by the platform (hardware) device capabilities that are enforced by the software.

• Cisco VPN Client behind PIX 515E,-> VPN concentrator

  I'm trying to configure a client as follows:

  The user is running Cisco VPN Client 4.0. They are behind a 6.1 PIX 515E (4), and I need to connect to a VPN concentrator located outside of our network. We use PAT for address translation. As far as I know, to allow ipsec through Firewall 1 tunnel, I need to upgrade the pix to 6.3 and activate "fixup protocol esp-ike.

  Is there another way to do this? I am also curious to know how much more easy/better this will work if we were dealing with pptp.

  You don't necessarily need to fixup protocol esp-ike active. The remote Hub there encapsulation NAT - T enabled so that clients behind the NAT can run?

• Cisco VPN Client is blocking incoming connections

  Hello

  I somethimes (not always) a problem with the Cisco VPN Client.

  As soon as the CISCO VPN Client is installed (it must not be running) it blocks inbound connections from the local network.

  The problem is that I use Ultra VNC SC to support some of my clients. Another client is supported by Cisco VPN. With UltraVNC SC customer clients try to connect to my PC.

  But if I installed the cisco VPN Client, no incoming connections are possible.

  How can I change this behavior?

  This behavior is not always the same. Last incoming connections of two months were possible, but from one day to another is not possible more.

  I recently installed the Client, but it takes no effect :-(

  I have NOT activated the firewall Cisco on the VPN Client and the behavior is NOT only if the Client is activated. This is the behavior even if it is NOT active and just installed.

  Hi Chris,

  Zone alarm is installed on the PC that is defective?

  Try to restart the Cisco VPN service and launch the vpn client.

  I remember having a similar problem with the Cisco VPN Client. Some conflict between the VPN client and Zone-Alarm, installed on the same PC.

  The problem was with VSDATANT variables in the registry key.

  Please see the following mail took from another forum:

  http://www.OutpostFirewall.com/Forum/showthread.php?t=9917