On the use of the RAM and upgrade...

Hi... iam using 4 GB ram in the 32-bit version of windows 7. .but it showing 2.53 usable... I want to make full use of... I goggled this question someone posted... Install the file named (http://www.tarfandestan.com/files/Patch-3-Windows-Vista-and-7.zip)... .with this software is not possible... ghoulish u explain to me...

IAM using the s850 toshiba model...
Thank you.

This is a limitation of the 32-bit system.  ~1.5 concerts that are not available are probably used by your video card.

I would not go that the software that you have no idea of what it contains.  It could easily contain malware.

Tags: Windows

Similar Questions

  • I need to upgrade my Mac (MacBook white unibody mid 2010) with a SSD (and iMac mid-2010) and the RAM and SSD

    I need to upgrade my Mac (white unibody MacBook mid-2010) with a SSD (and iMac mid-2010) and the RAM and SSD: I look to buy upgrades site Crucial and OWC site and there is a little difference, in terms of money: it's better to buy the Crucial site or OWC site.

    MacBook, OS X El Capitan (10.11.4)

    < re-titled by host >

    They have good tools to find compatible parts for your Mac models.  The OWC took is here

    http://eShop.MacSales.com/MyOWC/

    OWC tends to have the most detailed information on the Mac.  If I look to the top of the part to OWC and review specifications.  OWC offers often information based on the Mac-specific tests.  If Crucial offer something similar for a substantially lower price, buy it from Crucial.  I'm sure they have a refund is not political, if a part they say is compatible.  I bought the RAM and SSD both Crucial and OWC.  From my experience, be it high quality.

    For the 2010 iMac, OWC also offers a "kit" (with the tools and support) to replace the hard drive of 3.5 inches with a 2.5-inch SSD.  Eventually, if it's a 27-inch iMac, I think that you can Add the SSD instead of replace the hard drive.  And they have self-produced how-to videos on the process, related to many of their lists of products.  OWC provides a lot of information with added value and service for Mac users.

    OWC also offers kits to replace the optical drive on some Macs (including MacBooks) with an SSD (as a secondary internal drive).

  • HP 110-243wb desktop PC: can I upgrade the ram and memory of my HP 110-243wb desktop PC?

    Can I upgrade the ram and memory of this HP 110-243wb desktop PC? What suggest you and you thank in advance.

    What did you find?  Was it a 8 GB module?  Two modules of 8 GB is the MAXIMUM.

    Yes, this is why I suggested the part numbers.  You have to match pairs.

  • Font managers of the RAM and fonts

    Hi all

    I feel that the ability to enable and disable individual fonts using font (font book or third party) management software is designed to eliminate RAM memory (or at least somehow the unloading of the treatment of the Mac).

    I also believe I read that he mentioned somewhere that all fonts placed in the user/Library/Fonts location are always active in the RAM, and this is perhaps why it is important to not just throw hundreds of fonts in this folder.

    I wonder:

    -If above are true?

    -If you use third-party font management software to disable a font placed in the folder User/Library/Fonts eliminates actually he RAM memory (as is probably for policies outside the system of appointed police records)?

    -If none of this is true, then why even should we use font management software to disable or deactivate fonts - why not just let them all turned on if they are not in the RAM?

    I want to make sure that I fully understand. I hope that this will help me make more informed decisions about my workflow of font management.

    I'm under El Capitan 10.11.6, although I don't think that this specificity is relevant.

    Thanks for the informed answers!

    I don't think you are quite correct, I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong but here is my assessment of the situation...

    All installed or active policies are not loaded in RAM at startup because it would be than a useless on memory limited to Macs. System fonts will be loaded into memory as they are usually required.

    I believe that certain police functions get cached, such as previews of the fonts that are used in some applications, these selection committees are often written cache files stored on the drive that I can tell.

    Installation and activation of the thousands of fonts may cause some problems as apps may need to generate previews of these fonts - for example MS Word has its own custom selector of fonts that use the real font for names selection. Some design apps can analyze or search fonts when opening certain documents with the related font styles. Other applications such as TextEdit, Mail system use based Gatherer so that they benefit the plan puts large fonts in cache.

    The reason of FontBook is to assist in the management of fonts. OS X uses the 'library' system to allow multiple levels of abstraction, by example/System/Library is for OS-level files (stuff own apples), / library of the third parties who rely on the scale of the support system, ~/Library for user specific files. There is even in charge of resources to be stored in/Network/Library for use with a server on a WAN.

    Manage all this complex without a central application. In my view, that order preference is the user on the highest levels, so your own user fonts folder is selected on the system if you named the same way fonts. Part of the idea is also that you can export fonts in your own home library without affecting the other users of the system.

    Third parties also have police managers this attempt to 'do the right thing' based on what documents and applications you use. These are for most major design offices that use custom fonts or is needed to deal with versions of specific fonts, variations and even if the fonts are licenses for specific customers etc.. Fonts dynamically loading & unloading can cause headaches depending on what software you use.

    I do not think that average users need to think about fonts on OS X (beyond adding their favorites occasionally), you may be overthinking it unless you're in lots of design work.

    If you are concerned about running out of RAM, you probably need to install more, get a better Mac or run applications less. Just keep in mind what OS X tent now to use all the RAM available most of the time if not what is the point of installing it?

  • Satellite L70-A-139 - guaranteed zero when removing the cover for the RAM and HARD drive

    Hi all

    I have a Satellite L70-A-139 youcef.
    And at the back of the laptop, there is a cover that is fixed with a screw.

    Wil I void the warranty when I unscrew and take a look?
    I want to upgrade my HDD to SSD.
    The motherboard supports Sata III: D.

    Thank you!

    No, the mandate must still be valid.
    There is a removable cover at the bottom of the unit as shown here:
    [Toshiba Satellite C70 / C75 / C70D / C75D / L70 / L70t / S70 / HARD S70t drive replacement procedure | http://aps2.toshiba-tro.de/kb0/CRU3703HG0000R01.htm]

    Then you should be able to upgrade the RAM and HARD drive.
    I think this info should be mentioned in the user manual too.

  • msmpeg2vdec.dll explorer.exe is originally to use all my RAM and disk i/o

    Hello

    When opening some folders (just by clicking on the file in a different folder is causing the problem too) that contain media files on my system it causes explorer.exe use all my RAM and max on my disk i/o.

    Process using explore and RamMap I see that msmpeg2vdec.dll on my system is causing explorer.exe use all my RAM and disk i/o.

    RamMap using I see the entire file 6 GB + is attempted to be loaded into memory to live. :(

    Full stack of the msmpeg2vdec.dll! Live ThreadedDecode wire then it tries to load the file into memory:

    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiSwapContext + 0x7a
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiCommitThreadWait + 0x1d2
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KeWaitForSingleObject + 0x19f
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiSuspendThread + 0 x 74
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiDeliverApc + 0 x 211
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiCommitThreadWait + 0x3dd
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KeWaitForMultipleObjects + 0 x 271
    Ntoskrnl.exe! ObpWaitForMultipleObjects + 0 x 294
    Ntoskrnl.exe! NtWaitForMultipleObjects + 0xe5
    Ntoskrnl.exe! KiSystemServiceCopyEnd + 0x13
    ntdll.dll. ZwWaitForMultipleObjects + 0xa
    KERNELBASE.dll! WaitForMultipleObjectsEx + 0xe8
    Kernel32.dll! WaitForMultipleObjects + 0xb0
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! CMFSampleList::WaitForMoreData + 0x2e
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! CH264DecoderSoftware::GetDataFromStream + 0xc2
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! CCoreH264Decoder::GetMoreData + 0x4d
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! GlobalGetMoreData + 0x13
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! getMoreData + 0x1e8
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! GetAnnexbNALUNoEncrypt + 0x33d
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! Parse_One_Slice_Nalu + 0xae
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! Parse_Nalu_Till_Meet_New_Pic + 0x5d
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! Task_PED + 0 x 184
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! StageExecute_PED + 0 x 91
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! TaskScheduler_FindAndExecuteTask + 0x12c
    msmpeg2vdec.dll! ThreadedDecode + 0 x 92
    Kernel32.dll! BaseThreadInitThunk + 0xd
    ntdll.dll. RtlUserThreadStart + 0x1d

    I know it's the msmpeg2vdec.dll! ThreadedDecode thread because if I hang just this thread into explorer.exe it stops the disk i/o and freezes at some current RAM usage, it should be. And if I kill the thread all my RAM is released.

    Oddly enough I can open the file just fine itself very well in an application and have no question also. Only when you try to display the file in the Explorer himself this problem occurs.

    Thanks for the help,

    Will be

    PS: Why does my mouse cursor disappeared when editing this post? Boring!

    It looks like the Explorer tent to generate preview thumbnails of the videos. You can try to disable the genration of the thumbnails in the options of Solution Explorer. Now, the Explorer shows only the icon.

    André

    "A programmer is just a tool that converts the caffeine in code" Deputy CLIP - http://www.winvistaside.de/

  • NB200 - upgrade the RAM and install Windows 7?

    Hello to you guys.

    I'm back and received the news for you. I got my new Toshiba NB200-10Z. I would like to ask you:

    What are your comments on the upgrade of RAM? The difference is notable? It worth the cost?
    What RAM memory slot I'm supposed to get? And what is the maximum memory I can update?

    What are your ideas on installing Windows 7 as the only operating system OR to have both on different partitions?

    Thank you all in advance

    Hello

    Just one question: you have a new laptop and why you didn t consult the user manual?
    I ask this because in the user manual, you can find all the information on the upgrade of the RAM.
    In my opinion RAM upgrade is always useful because the RAM modules are cheap nowadays and with 2 or 3 GB, you have enough RAM for applications.

    Regarding the issue of Windows 7 you can install it if you want, why not? You can do what you want with your laptop, but I prefer the pre-installed version of XP at the moment because Windows 7 isn't on the market yet.
    If you want to install you need extra partition for it.

  • Satellite L655 - 14 d - upgrade the RAM and sound card

    I have the Satellite L655 - 14 d there 3 GB RAM, I would like to know if I can upgrade the RAM if yes how? I would also like to know if I can add a card his 5.1 or 7.1 internally or externally without problem.

    Help, please

    Hello

    Sound chip is part of the mobo. Impossible to upgrade this or replace this part.
    You can use an external sound card, but I put t know how it will work in your laptop.

    Regarding the upgrade of RAM;
    Yes, you can upgrade the RAM.
    Check the user manual and extra, you can consult this section of the forum:
    http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/Forums/Forum.jspa?forumid=114

  • Updated the motherboard, processor and RAM and upgraded to Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit, after upgrade the external hard drive encrypted with bitlocker will not enter the password.

    Original title: bitllocker Windows 7 issue

    Hello

    I recently updated my motherboard, processor and RAM, but I kept my original 500 GB hard drive, and equipped with a hard drive 2 TB extra, after the upgrade, I downloaded windows 7 ultimate 64-bit. After the upgrade I plugged my external hard drive (which has all my stuff important on it, that is to say the photo, video etc.) to realize that I had he encrypted with bitlocker on my old sysem. It allows Me to enter my password, it looks for a USB flash drive key, I did not. My question is:

    Can I replace my old system with the old motherboard, hard drive and the original RAM to remove the external hard drive for bitlocker?

    I still have the file windows.old on my hard drive, I have to restore it and remove the most recent version of windows 7 off the drive. I do this before I rebuild my old PC? I'm stuck here and would not lose all my photos (the wife would kill me!) I would appreciate your help.

    Hello

    Reassembly of the old computer won't help. You will always need the key to open the Bitlocker.

    You can read the articles and check:

    What is the difference between BitLocker Drive encryption and EFS file system?

    Protect your files using BitLocker Drive encryption

    In Windows 7 BitLocker Drive Encryption: frequently asked Questions

    Hope the helps of information. Let us know if you need help with Windows related issues. We will be happy to help you.

  • The RAM and HARD drive upgrade

    Hello

    I put my laptop, at level

    8.1 Windows 64-bit, Intel Core i7-4700MP @ 2.40 GHz

    Currently 12 GB of Ram - 8 GB & 4 GB Kingston DDR3

    Currently 1 TB Toshiba HDD
    http://storage.Toshiba.EU/CMS/en/HDD/computing/product_detail.jsp?ProductID=409

    I'm looking to upgrade the 4 GB of RAM to a 8 GB, I just don't know how many pins each room has. Any guidance where to find this without disassembling the machine would be very handy! -I think it's a 204pin?

    Also looking to add a second hard drive on my machine, what is the maximum size that can take this laptop? Ideally I'd like an another 1 TB HDD (same brand) than my current. Is this possible? Then the hard drives of 1 TB overprinting two system?

    EDIT: Is it possible to have the other as an SSD? Although that can't really benefits to have as a slave instead of a master drive.

    Thank you very much

    Dan

    Hello

    Manual - Page 2

    Plug

    RAM: Yes, 204pin SODIMM SDRAM desired. You can buy the memory stick to the exact configuration & preference even brand that is already installed on your computer laptop & listed in the service manual, so that it works correctly.

    Configuration of the RAM: 8 GB DDR3L 1600 MHz PC3L-12800 1.35v SODIMM SDRAM

    Run this tool to know the configuration & Details of RAM already installed.

    Page 51 details the procedure of replacement, fairly simple.

    HDD: According to the manual, it has double drive HARD support. You can put another 1 TB 2.5 inch 9.5 mm SATA HDD. You can buy additonal material of hard drive Kit (HP PRTs number: 720237-001) to install on secondary Bay for data storage.

    I would have preferred a faster 7200 RPM HARD drive with the cache higher like this , if you want more storage.

    Alternatively, you can replace the current HDD with SSD of similar form factor (2.5 inches SATA 7 mm or 9.5 mm thick) and make as boot drive by moving the drive toward SSD HARD integer before replacement & put old HDD to secondary storage Bay. SSD would defintely thrust upward performance drastically, but they are expensive - I would say worth the cost.

    Page 48-50 details the replacement procedure. Its relatively simple to do.

    Concerning

    Visruth

  • Micorsoft windows search filter host uses 3g of ram and slows down the computer to a crawl.

    search filter host started running after the updates and it slowed my laptop to a crawl.   Why is it turning?  And that fact?

    Running Vista on the HP hdx laptop.  RAM 4g dual-core

    It is probably rebuild the search Index (maybe called something in one of the updates for this action) - Although it could do other things as well (it's hard to tell).  You can do this finish faster in general by reducing the number of file types or sites included in the Index (Start/Control / Panel / Indexing Options / Advanced)- but the file types and locations are not included in basic research (it's a compromise).  Some people say that excluding files .xml help (especially if you have a big disco).

    If this does not solve the problem (or you're stuck with it running and it will not be closed) Download Process Explorer http://download.cnet.com/Process-Explorer/3000-2094_4-10223605.html and see which fits all the CPU usage - it should provide more information than Manager and helps focus in spots on the problem.

    The problem may be with the updates (or one of the updates).  Try a system restore to a point in time BEFORE the problem started (before installing updates without doubt).  Here is the procedure: http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/using-windows-vista-system-restore/.  Don't forget to check the box to show more than 5 days of restore points.  If the first attempt fails, then try an earlier point or two.  NOTE: You will need to re - install any software and updates that you have installed between now and the restore point, but you can use Windows Update for updates (but be careful, because if the issue is resolved, then one of these probably caused updates and you do not want to recreate the problem).

    For more information on the updates (which seems to be the source of your problem since it was started after them installed), repost in the Windows Update Forum: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/InternetExplorer/threads where the people who specialize in updating issues will be more than happy to help you with this problem.  Try to provide them with the names of the updates and their number KB (as well as all that you have done to try to solve the problem).

    I hope this helps.

    Good luck!

    Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

  • Best Config for the new MBP 13 "retina? (decide between the RAM and the space... i7 also confirmation is worth)

    I'm in the market for a new MBP 13 "retina and I have a few questions about where max out of the unit.

    What I have... I currently have a renovated MBP 13 "retina, end 2012, 2.9 GHz, 8 GB to 128 GB of storage. I was especially pleased with this machine. I love the SSD and the quick start. The only regions that in deca for me were video compression and storage of physical disk speed. I currently have about 30 GB HD free space, but it's because I'm a Spartan and store essential files only on the MBP. Without a doubt, I want to double my storage on the following I buy (at least it will give it more leeway to work properly).

    What I do for a living... I am a writer and also a vlogger. I opted for the i7 chip because video compression is painful on the cell current, particularly H264. I use MS Word, Photoshop, Quicktime Pro and compression software to take videos and convert raw. MOV H264. So my core processing tasks, record audio/video and audio/video compression. I turn on photoshop work.

    What I would like to get...

    • MacBook Pro 13 inch with Retina display
    • 3.1GHz dual - core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz
    • Intel Iris 6100 graphics card
    • 8 GB RAM
    • 256 GB HD

    My Questions:

    1. It is better to push either the HD or RAM, up to 16 GB or 512 GB, respectively? I can't afford both. Or does save $200. (I upgraded in general on 3-year cycles)
    2. I guess that the i7 will help with the compression of various media or export tasks I have? Usually, I have to record videos using the internal camera and then export it into a format more suitable for delivery. Same with the audio (except that I capture with a blue Yeti MIC). Basically, I want to just speed up export jobs and compression. To do this, I guess the i7 and turbo boost will shine?

    Just curious if anyone has any advice... I would like to purchase today. Thank you! I'm leaning towards i7 with 256 SSD and 8 GB of RAM. Since I already have an i7 on my 2012 model, descending into the processor speed is not really sense (2.9-2.7). Nor do the same (2.9 to 2.9). I'd love to 16 GB of RAM, but it pushes the machine to near $2 K.

  • change the copy and upgrade project options

    Hello

    FSCM90 and tools 8.49

    I opened my project in the application designer. On the upgrade tab, I see that the action is EXEMPLARY and UPGRADE is checked.

    Then I run the following text in the database:

    UPDATE PSPROJECTITEM SET TAKEACTION = 0, UPGRADEACTION = 0 WHERE PROJECTNAME = "MYPROJECT"


    Can I reload the project. But again upgrade tab, I see that the action is EXEMPLARY and UPGRADE is checked.


    Why update table PSPROJECTITEM dose not change my project in the application, update TAB Designer?


    Another way to change them without doing it manually?


    Thank you.

    Update of tables via SQL tools is generally not supported by Oracle.

    Both explanations possible, why you do not see your updates...

    1. You didn't do your update before reloading the project.
    2. More likely, since version psprojectdefn was not changed you reloaded the original project from the cache.

    If you run the application using the Designer 2 levels that you can try to clear the cache of your office after running and committing your update sql. If you run in mode 3 levels you need to clear the cache of application server. Do not try to update the version in psprojectdefn unless the Support of Oracle is ready to provide you with the instructions to do it correctly. It requires corresponding updates to multiple tables.

    Note that upgradeaction = 0 corresponds to the action = COPY, so your sql is not really changed this value.

    In addition, if you want to change the action for all the objects in a project you can do easily in any case app designer - open the project, switch to the upgrade tab and open the grid details for any object type, and then either right-click on any object (or select Edit-> update from the main menu) and then set the Action for the project and choose copy or delete.

    You can not change flag for upgrade to a draft set of the designer of the app, but you can change it for all objects of a given type. Open the details for the type of object from the upgrade tab, and then click in the top left box in the grid (next to the heading "key ") to select all, then right click and choose UNTAG ro Tag for upgrade. Alternatively, you can uncheck specific definition types during the copy of the project. If you want to copy the definition of the project without copying the object definitions at all, just click deselect all next to the definition (s) on the database copy Panel (and copy project definition is checked, of course).

    Kind regards

    Bob

  • What can I put the RAM and the hard drive of a Macbook Pro 13 "2014 in a Macbook Pro 13" 2016?

    The main logic of my Macbook Pro 13 "2014 card is broken, and it turns out that it will be much easier and just slightly more expensive, buying a new Macbook Pro that, in order to replace. I would like to set up my new Macbook Pro 13 "online in a way such that it is as cheap as possible, while always respecting the level of my former. So, if I could order one with the minimum of RAM and disk space hard and then put these pieces of my old in the new, this would be ideal. I don't know so much about it, and the question is: is it possible?

    my old Mackbook Pro 13 ":"

    -purchased new August 2014

    -3.0 GHz dual-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.5

    -DDR3L 16 GB 1600 MHz SDRAM

    -Storage flash 512 GB PCIe

    -Intel Iris graphics card

    I'll get to buy e new generation Mackbook Pro 13 "with:"

    -2.9 GHz i5 or i7 3.1 (I've not yet decided)

    -RAM: Here I want to configure it with as little as possible, if I can just put the chips of the old in the new. Is this possible?

    -Hard drive: same thing: if possible, I want to get the cheapest option and simply put the old in the new. Possible?

    Thank you in advance to anyone who might take a few minutes to help out me! It would be much appreciated!

    The RAM is not transferable, and the reader will be not as fast as the original of the newest computer; In addition, change it the warranty of the news of the computer.

    (143318)

  • FF using too much RAM and slow down

    FF uses too much RAM
    After I started FF, like 5 minutes later, use as a 1 GB of ram, and if I don't restart it, I push up to 3 GB ~ 4 GB of RAM used

    the article above has not helped
    updated to version beta and resolved

Maybe you are looking for