OpenVpn

Similar Questions

• iOS10 openVPN

  I have been using openVPN on the iPhone for a long time with 8 and 9 of iOS iOS. There is no problem. Today I updated the phone to iOS 10. After that the openVPN app no longer works. I can move the slide, switch to green color changes, but nothing else. There are no new line in the newspaper. It displays "Disconnected", and that's all.

  There is no difference if the phone is connected to the internet through WLAN or LTE. In Safari, the web browser, I can open web pages without problem.

  What could I do? Could someone help?

  OpenVPN uses PPTP Protocol by chance? PPTP is no longer supported in iOS 10. You must use other VPN protocols.

  Prepare for removal of PPTP VPN before you upgrade to iOS 10 and macOS Sierra - Apple Support

• Why Firefox do not connect to Web sites more after that I made a connection with OpenVPN?

  IE has the same problem. UTorrent still working after I connect with OpenVPN.
  I am running XP Professional SP 3.

  During the OpenVPN connection I ping google.com. It does not work. When I ping the IP (instead of name) from google.com I get respons.

  By the time I disconnect my connection OpenVPN Firefox work again as usual

  This is a guess, but: do your TCP/IP in Windows settings specify a particular DNS server? If so, you may need to clear that if DNS servers can be defined by the proxy service.

• no connection possible outgoing openvpn

  Recently, I replaced an old router with a time capsule Airport (version 7.7.3) (and in another room with an airport express).

  Since this installation, I am not able to connect to openVPN in the work of the office. There is no problem if I use my old wifi or my IPhone as a personal hotspot.

  When you try to use openvpn I'm always connected to the time capsule Airport (in which case it's interesting)

  Research on 'internet' gives no useful result of which could be underway, so any help is appreciated.

  I forgot to mention (quite probably important):

  -It connects to the VPN that is identical to the work situation

  -I can ping the virtual private network addresses

  -No other "traffic" as possible (ssh, http, https, etc.). Symptom is that it blocks just forever (ssh) or charges for always (web page).

  -J' use tunnelblick

  Mvgr,

  Martin

  Post edited by: cbaahmi

  Such things can sometimes be an MTU problem. See https://groups.google.com/forum/#! topic/tunnelblick-discuss/ttvriICTZV0.

  Another possibility is a DNS problem. The value Tunnelblick (one) route by the VPN and (B) check if IP address of changes (both are in the window "Details of VPN" Tunnelblick 3.6beta20). Wait at least 90 seconds after the connection, and then look in the Tunnelblick journal for a message on the IP address change. (The change of IP address tries to contact tunnelblick.net through its name, and if that fails, by its IP address, so it may help in diagnosing the problems of routing DNS issues).

• Issue ubuntu Client - openVPN - VPN connection to proSafe SSL / FSV318

  Hello

  I want to set up a Simple SSL VPN tunnel. A thin client Linux - connection to the FVS318N.

  The web - SSL is not suitable for me, because the java applet uses a root access, but normally, I do not use the root account.

  What kind of client do you recommend for linux guests? You have a description brief installation for it?

  I am trying to use openVPN, but get the following output from openVPN:

  Fri 22 April 10:58:18 error 2016 TLS: TLS key negotiation failed to occur within 60 seconds (check your network connectivity)
  Fri 22 April 10:58:18 error 2016 TLS: TLS handshake failed

  I see nothing in the SSL VPN on the FVS318 log file.

  Best regards

  Florian

  FHo salvation,

  You should probably use IPSec VPN.

  https://help.Ubuntu.com/community/IPSecHowTo

  Hope this helps

• R7800 and compatible iOS OpenVPN

  Anyone have an idea when we are likely to see iOS support for OpenVPN on Earth from R7800 - I see other models are better slowly updating (including the R7000 - a much older model), so I was wondering when the R7800 will be online for this update?

  Hi garethr,.

  You can consult our support for any available firmware site. Release notes are available as well with the firmware for the updates updated or added features that users want to know.

• Actions through OpenVPN access problems

  Hello!

  If you are installing the client OpenVPN for Windows XP (regardless of the MS level) and it connects to the OpenVPN server can (sometimes after a reboot, sometimes right away) the other machine on the other end cannot access Windows XP actions if the connection machine a NetBIOS over TCP/IP (port 139) disabled. The error message is 'no network couldn't take the provided network path."

  Œuvres ping and all the firewall is turned off. Sniff the OpenVPN adapter reveals that XP meets port 445 with a RST packet (also called connection refused).

  OpenVPN adapter uncheck file service and print server and double check that it makes it work (i.e. XP starts normally answer on port 445 on OpenVPN adapter too). The print spooler service must be restarted too. But this only lasts until the next computer restart.

  This would imply that the file and printer sharing service is not related to OpenVPN adapter but netstat - aon | find ": 445 ' watch 0.0.0.0:445 is correctly bound to the process of the system 4.

  Gert Döring of openvpn-devel mailing list commented on the topic:

  6/26/2010 Gert Doering<*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">

  Hello

  
  On Wednesday, 23 June 2010, at 22:50:45 + 0300, Henno Taht says:
  > Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 22:48, Gert Doering <*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">wrote:

  > On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 09:10:10 + 0200, Jan just Keijser wrote:
  > assigns an address 169.254. If it works for you as well, then perhaps the
  > tap-win32 developers can dive more deeply into this and find out why windows
  > the 'always connected' adapter to treat differently a ' application
  > controlled ' adapter.
  > >
  > I guess that windows services are not "related" to the "dynamic"... interfaces
  >
  > You mean by dynamic interface, an interface that has "obtain IP address".
  ' > automatically "set?

  No, I was thinking about interfaces that sort of "aren't always there.

  But it was a false idea, interface TAP * is * always there - which of
  controlled application is if she is 'connected to an ethernet cable.
  (virtual, of course) all the time, or only if openvpn, it says so.

  But my idea is not really sense – it's like windows would not be
  Start windows sharing if the ethernet cable is not connected at boot time.

  
  Gert

  (this post never made to archives for a reason, even if Gert cc had openvpn-users and openvpn-devel)

  Also, Jan just Keijser openvpn users list said:

  2010-6-22 jan just Keijser<*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">

  Henno Taht says:

  The only thing I can think is that Windows XP explicitly forbidden access to the port 445 as contre-caution unless it comes from a "official" network card

  That's exactly how it feels. But why the Windows XP (and only Windows XP) would block OpenVPN TAP adaptor (and only this particular card) service for sharing files and printer (port 445, aka microsoft-ds a.k.a. DirectSMB) and only when the IP map of OpenVPN is configured with DHCP (if you put the IP address manually, no problems).

  Is there some sweet security mechanism integrated in the XP kernel that blocks incoming connections on port 445 (controlled by 'System' process with PID 4) if the adapter is 'virtual', even if process control binds to 0.0.0.0?

  Hoping someone at Microsoft reads this,
  Henno Taht

  Hello!

  If you are installing the client OpenVPN for Windows XP (regardless of the MS level) and it connects to the OpenVPN server can (sometimes after a reboot, sometimes right away) the other machine on the other end cannot access Windows XP actions if the connection machine a NetBIOS over TCP/IP (port 139) disabled. The error message is 'no network couldn't take the provided network path."

  Œuvres ping and all the firewall is turned off. Sniff the OpenVPN adapter reveals that XP meets port 445 with a RST packet (also called connection refused).

  OpenVPN adapter uncheck file service and print server and double check that it makes it work (i.e. XP starts normally answer on port 445 on OpenVPN adapter too). The print spooler service must be restarted too. But this only lasts until the next computer restart.

  This would imply that the file and printer sharing service is not related to OpenVPN adapter but netstat - aon | find ": 445 ' watch 0.0.0.0:445 is correctly bound to the process of the system 4.

  Gert Döring of openvpn-devel mailing list commented on the topic:

  6/26/2010 Gert Doering<*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">

  Hello

  
  On Wednesday, 23 June 2010, at 22:50:45 + 0300, Henno Taht says:
  > Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 22:48, Gert Doering <*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">wrote:

  > On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 09:10:10 + 0200, Jan just Keijser wrote:
  > assigns an address 169.254. If it works for you as well, then perhaps the
  > tap-win32 developers can dive more deeply into this and find out why windows
  > the 'always connected' adapter to treat differently a ' application
  > controlled ' adapter.
  > >
  > I guess that windows services are not "related" to the "dynamic"... interfaces
  >
  > You mean by dynamic interface, an interface that has "obtain IP address".
  ' > automatically "set?

  No, I was thinking about interfaces that sort of "aren't always there.

  But it was a false idea, interface TAP * is * always there - which of
  controlled application is if she is 'connected to an ethernet cable.
  (virtual, of course) all the time, or only if openvpn, it says so.

  But my idea is not really sense – it's like windows would not be
  Start windows sharing if the ethernet cable is not connected at boot time.

  
  Gert

  (this post never made to archives for a reason, even if Gert cc had openvpn-users and openvpn-devel)

  Also, Jan just Keijser openvpn users list said:

  2010-6-22 jan just Keijser<*** email="" address="" is="" removed="" for="" privacy="" ***="">

  Henno Taht says:

  The only thing I can think is that Windows XP explicitly forbidden access to the port 445 as contre-caution unless it comes from a "official" network card

  That's exactly how it feels. But why the Windows XP (and only Windows XP) would block OpenVPN TAP adaptor (and only this particular card) service for sharing files and printer (port 445, aka microsoft-ds a.k.a. DirectSMB) and only when the IP map of OpenVPN is configured with DHCP (if you put the IP address manually, no problems).

  Is there some sweet security mechanism integrated in the XP kernel that blocks incoming connections on port 445 (controlled by 'System' process with PID 4) if the adapter is 'virtual', even if process control binds to 0.0.0.0?

  Hoping someone at Microsoft reads this,
  Henno Taht

  I thought about it... just go into the drive you want to share, click share... click Permissions... add... click click on advanced... click on advanced search now... Select ANONYMOUS LOGON, and then click OK. You will probably even if connect to it using the format "\\192.168.0.1\a", but it works.

• LRT214 - OpenVPN - unable to connect

  So, I've spent the last two days trying to get OpenVpn to work with zero success. I started by following the tutorial, exactly as the manual says. I export the configuration file and load it on a different device on a different network and attempt to connect, but with zero success.

  After that I tried to play with different ports with zero success. I tried UDP and TCP with zero success. I added rules to allow traffic on these ports with zero success.

  When I say zero success, it is not entirely true. I can't get a connection. But from time to time I find a setting that will produces a log of SSL on the LRT214 which gives me: SIGTERM [hard], received, treat out.

  On the client side my logs are back with this for TCP: the system tried to join a drive to a directory on a joined drive.

  and for UDP, I get: TLS error: TLS key negotiation failed to occur within 60 seconds (check your network connectivity.

  I know that I can talk to my router because I install a simple PPTP VPN and it worked perfectly, but OpenVPN, not so much.

  Any ideas or comments would be great to help me understand this!

  Thank you!

  So after having a great revolution at the wheel, I understood the question. I feel almost stupid to do this.

  For my xBox, I have forwarded port all traffic to reach NAT open to all the games that I play. List could as long for port transmits all.

  This caused any request to connect to the router via OpenVPN, because the router will be sent directly to the release of the xBox. I had added a rule for the port forward just the port OpenVPN for the router itself, but it did not work at first, because the router takes the list of ports to the front in order that it was created in. To solve the problem, so I 1194 TCP forwarded to the IP of the router, then any traffic thereupon forwarded to the xBox.

  Not sure what the best way to handle this, but it's the solution, I came to the top with for now. Looking to hear for the best solutions.

  Now, my next issue is that after the Split Tunnel connection, I cannot ping any computer in the network, nor can I ping the remote client.

  Ideas or suggestions on this?

• LRT214 management via OpenVPN

  I installed the LRT214 with the current firmware LRT2x4_1.0.4.03_20150914. I am able to connect to the router via OpenVPN; Ping the router and other guests, however, I am unable to manage the router/AP. It seems that the port (80) on the management of IP (192.168.1.x) s blocked when accessing via OpenVPN (172.31.0.x).

  I have no remote management enabled that I am not access router via 443 (https).

  Did I miss something in the configuration to allow for management of the router remotely via OpenVPN?

  

• WRT 1900 ACS - Impossible to carry web traffic through openvpn

  2.3.11 OpenVPN windows 7 X 86. Router information

  Firmware version:	1.0.0.169041
  Serial number:	18E1060B503339

  By default, OpenVPN only sends traffic over the VPN, which is intended for the VPN. Normal traffic to Web sites, for example, is not sent by the VPN. Which can be modified to send all traffic through the VPN?

  @alexdemon

  Router WRT1900ACS is a SOHO router. It doesn't have a feature of access rule where the web traffic can be managed and regulated. The tool of Parental control of your Linksys Smart Wi - Fi account is designed for local customers only.

  Note:

  OpenVPN can create the tunnel from the remote host to the main network and thus web traffic cannot be routed through the router firewall.

  Ann_18678
  Linksys technical support

• WRT1900AC OpenVPN sees only not the side of the router LAN

  I have a WRT1900AC with the OpenVPN server, put in place.

  Can I access with my laptop running the OpenVPN client on the internet (the router is in one State other than me).

  I ping the hotspot side WAN, internet access at the router.

  I can't see or ping devices on the side of the router LAN.

  The address of the router LAN is 10.2.3.1 which I can not ping when I am connected through the OpenVPN client.

  The OpenVPN am assinged IP is 172.19.13.3 and the DHCP server on the LAN router is not a fixed range of 10.2.3.35 to 10.2.3.50 with cameras with IP in the range of the DHCP server.

  I guess that once I connect to the OpenVPN server in the router it automatically will fill for the devices connected to the router ports, is this correct? Y at - it a setting I need to change?

  Thanks in advance!

  The router firmware is up-to-date (we keep turned on the auto update feature).

  Today, I can access the devices connected to the router ports via the VPN.

  I do nothing else than yesterday, but it works... so for now, the issue is resloved...

  I guess I had the correct settings.

  I hate it when things get fixed, but I don't know why!

  Thank you for your support.

• route all traffic through wrt openVpn 1900ac Server

  Hi all

  I have been on this issue for a while now and I did not see any thread here who could help me

  so, if this has been asked before I'm sorry...

  so my question are as follows:

  1 is it still possible to route all traffic to my (and get my public ip address of router) when it is connected to its virtual private network?

  2. If possible, please explain how.

  3. If is not possible with the can firmware OEM I use others supporting it?

  Thank you very much in advance

  Liran

  The firmware Linksys OpenVPN solution allows access to your network resources, but there is no Internet connection.

  Instead, you need to use OpenWRT firmware:

  http://wiki.OpenWrt.org/Toh/Linksys/wrt1900ac

• WRT1900AC and OpenVPN with Macbook Pro

  I'm trying to set up a VPN connection to my home network so I can access the shares on a WD My Cloud EX2 NAS device when I am absent in the same way as when I'm home and connected to the network.  Here is where I am: I have installed successufully Tunnelblick on my mac and to set up OpenVPN on the WRT1900AC.  When you are connected from an external network I can access my router and NAS using the LAN IP addresses as well as ping devices on the local network (printer, etc.).  What I can't do, is see the NAS on my mac, or use the links I created folders in the shares on the NAS.

  I thought that the function of OpenVPN was supposed to connect to my network, I would be able to access these things?  Am I misunderstanding something here?  I understand that this connection will not carry my internet traffic through my router, but I don't care on this issue at this stage.  I just want a perfect access to the NAS at home.

  Thank you!

  VPN solutions have problems with DNS. I recommend the use of links address IP NAS instead of the NAS network name if that's how the links are currently configured.

• Support PPTP and OpenVPN

  Hey guys,.

  at my University, we have the possibility to connect to internet using pptp or openvpn, which does the playbook takes in charge. I think this needs to be fixed because it makes useless the playbook on many universities. If you think so too, I would be happy if you vote for the feature request in JIRA:

  https://www.BlackBerry.com/jira/browse/Tablet-224

  Marius

  Unfortunately, until they do this a public, no one but you will be able to see or vote in favour (except employees RIM/QNX).

• Order binding OpenVPN TAP number

  I am running a 64-bit Windows 7/8 environment AD using OpenVPN on remote computers to access our network/servers to our main office.

  In general, once install us OpenVPN on a new machine and configure the binding (setting in network connections) order so this OpenVPN TAP adapter is at the top of the binding on a machine order everything is fine. The question that I have is some how the binding change periodically. I do not know what causes the effect to change, but it is causing quite a few problems with my machines, one being that it is no longer in communication with my WSUS server.

  If I manually change the binding order so that the TAP water is at the top, all so well again.

  My question is how can I statically set the binding order so that the OpenVPN TAP adapter is always at the top of the binding order. I tried to play with the 'metric of the interface' but that does not seem to have any effect on the binding order.
  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Rich

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home