ORA-15137: cluster rolling patch

Similar Questions

• Apex 5.0 install the script gives error: ORA-02291 constraint (APEX_050000.SYS_C0013507)

  We used a script to install our applications in Apex 4.02. When you use this script with Apex 5.0, we get an error:

  [6399] ORA-02091: transaction cancelled

  [6400] ORA-02291: integrity constraint violation (APEX_050000.SYS_C0013507) - parent

  ALTER SESSION SET CURRENT_SCHEMA = &2;
  
  declare
     l_schema       varchar2(30) := upper('&1');
     l_workspace_id number;
     l_app_id       number;
  
  begin
     -- Get workspace ID for schema
     begin
        select workspace_id
          into l_workspace_id
          from apex_workspaces
         where workspace = l_schema;
     exception
        when no_data_found then
    
           -- Create workspace for schema
           apex_instance_admin.add_workspace(p_workspace_id => null, p_workspace => l_schema, p_primary_schema => l_schema, p_additional_schemas => null);
    
           -- Get ID for created workspace
           select workspace_id
             into l_workspace_id
             from apex_workspaces
            where workspace = l_schema;
     end;
  
     -- Put ID in install package
     apex_application_install.set_workspace_id(l_workspace_id);
  
     -- Get application ID.
     begin
        select application_id
          into l_app_id
          from apex_applications
         where workspace = l_schema;
  
        -- Set application ID in package
        apex_application_install.set_application_id(l_app_id);
  
     exception
        when no_data_found then
           -- No applicication create a new one
           apex_application_install.generate_application_id;
     end;
  
     -- Generate offset
     apex_application_install.generate_offset;
  
     -- Set schema and alias.
     apex_application_install.set_schema(l_schema);
     apex_application_install.set_application_alias(l_schema);
  
     l_app_id := apex_application_install.get_application_id;
     dbms_output.put_line('Applicatie installed with ID :' || l_app_id);
  end;
  /
  
  @..\apex\f127.sql
  
  

  The script starts promising:

  Applicatie installed with ID :100                                
  APPLICATION 127 - NedGraphics NedBrowser
  Set Credentials...
  Check Compatibility...
  API Last Extended:20130101
  Your Current Version:20130101 This import is compatible with version: 20100513
  COMPATIBLE (You should be able to run this import without issues.) Set Application ID...
  ...authorization schemes
  
  

  But in the end:

  .....scheme 39275367140332431
  ......scheme 47816685350333762
  ...plugins
  commit
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-02291: integrity constraint (APEX_050000.SYS_C0013507) violated - parent
  key not found
  
  

  F127. SQL is exported from 4.02 Apex.
  Can manually import this application in the Apex 5.0 using the Apex development interface...

  Hi René,.

  the bug is not public. I already fixed it for 5.0.2.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• The DB issue patch of the CARS from 10201 to 10205

  Hello
  
  I have the task to patch a CCR environment from 10201 to 10205 on linux x86_64, according to the README file for the patch (#8202632), I first apply the patch
  
  1.Clusterware.
  Database 2.Oracle homes.
  
  
  I'm kinda new to patching RAC databases, I wanted just a confirmation that the database (even if the ORACLE_HOME is not shared and local on each node) patch is not a rolling patch. *. The README indicates
  .
  .
  Close all Oracle RAC instances on the nodes, which range from the House of Oracle on which you will apply the patch set. To stop all Oracle RAC instances for a database, type the following command where db_name is the name of the database:
  
  * $ srvctl stop database db_name d *.
  .
  .
  
  The above command will disable the databases on all nodes, so this isn't a rolling upgrade and the database must be facing downwards, so that end users should be informed before patching there is a downtime involved.
  
  No confirmation of the people who have done this will be highly appreciated.
  
  Thank you
  C.

  Hello

  For clusterware we rolling patch.
  -apply the clusterware 10.2.0.5
  -Follow the instructions at the end of the installation

  for the patch may not not be database upgrade means database must be down

  See you soon

• How to apply the PSU on Oracle RAC?

  Hello guys,.

  How about the Oracle RAC database without any stop PSU? (patch only database, not clusterware).

  Lets say I have 2 CCR node on different hosts with separate houses oracle/grid (no shared resources). What are the steps to avoid blackouts? I simply apply the last OPatch on grid/oracle homes, and then generate the oracle user ocm.rsp file and simply run as root: opatch auto/patch/path /-oh oracle_home - ocmrf /path/ocm.rsp and he will do everything for me on this node? then move service on node patched and do the same on another node? Oh, and there will be no interruption of service? Thank you!

  Gytis

  Hello

  Yes, the concept of a rolling patch is that the DB will always be upward, albeit on a node or another (or maybe 2 of 3, etc.)

  Check out this doc, spec 14.2.4 reduce planned downtime Maintenance

  Essentially an instance will come down in time. You can either manually a node patch or another, or well let Oracle patch bearing (but make sure you test it in the configuration of test first, if you have one, or else we put up with the same group of patches just in case).

  The idea is that the VIP relocate Node2, or if you use SCAN apps will detect node1 down.

  If possible, it is good to do this with a team Apps - ask them to move the connection with Betclic / application servers to the next node in the cluster, then the first patch (rolling patch), then exchange all node1 and make the node 2.

  The same steps apply for clusterware.

  See you soon,.

• MAY BE DELAYED INITIALLY IMMEDIATE

  Hi Experts,

  Please tell me the meaning behind may be DEFERRED to the IMMEDIATE DEPARTURE

  with the example.

  See you soon,.

  Cham

  
  

  Can be DEFERRED allows you to decide when a constraint must be validated (end of statement IMMEDIATE/end of transaction - DEFERRED). The FIRST clause has two parameters, IMMEDIATE/DELAYED. If you specify IMMEDIATE constraint is evaluated at the end of the statement itself. If you specify DEFERRED, the constraint is evaluated at the end of the transaction. This behavior could be crushed using the SET CONSTRAINT command.

  Here is an example

  SQL> create table t (no integer);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> alter table t add constraint chk check (no != 0) deferrable initially immediate;
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> insert into t values (0);
  insert into t values (0)
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02290: check constraint (V195588.CHK) violated
  
  SQL> set constraint all deferred
    2  /
  
  Constraint set.
  
  SQL> insert into t values (0);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  commit
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-02290: check constraint (V195588.CHK) violated
  
  SQL>
  

  It is a well documented feature. You can look in the forced

• Compatibility issue with IE8

  Hello

  Like us, last post by ravil, I have a problem with the Service Manager 9 and 8 IExplorer, let me explain:

  
  Do not download the ActiveX wrapper controls in one of the pc of my colleagues, simply, IE won't display the 'allow', we have disabled the firewall and turned on all the Active-X option in the tools of iexplorer (version 8), but does not work, any idea?

  Perhaps could I download the .exe for another place and put in this laptop?

  O_o

  There is a MSI file to install X controls active available for download:

  Support and downloads-> click on the 'Download' button and select VMware services under the IT Business Management section Manager. Sign and accept the license, then select the top download section where VMWare Service Manager 9.0 Rolling Patch 9 controls MSI can be downloaded or the previous RP controls (its about 7 MB).
  

• Difference between the immediate and normal constraint primary key value

  Hello
  I tried the following to understand the difference between immediate constraint set and the primary normal stress
  

  create table cust (cust_id number ,cust_name varchar2(25));
  
  alter table cust add constraint cust_id_pk primary key(cust_id)
  deferrable initially deferred;
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'raj');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'sam');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  commit
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (SCOTT.CUST_ID_PK) violated
  
  
  SQL> set constraint cust_id_pk immediate;
  
  Constraint set.
  
  SQL> 
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'lata');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'lata');
  insert into cust values(1,'lata')
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (SCOTT.CUST_ID_PK) violated

  The above error violation even works for a normal constraints primary / unique
  
  So what is the use of the command
  
  immediate Set constraint cust_id_pk;
  
  
  Thank you

  So what is the use of the command

  In fact, the use of the command when you're dealing with foreign key constraints. As explained below

   SQL>  create table cust (cust_id number ,cust_name varchar2(25), supplier_id number);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> create table supp(supplier_id number);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> alter table supp add primary key(supplier_id);
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL>  ALTER TABLE cust ADD CONSTRAINT fk_cust_supp
    2    FOREIGN KEY (supplier_id)
    3    REFERENCES supp (supplier_id)
    4    DEFERRABLE
    5    INITIALLY deferred;
  
  Table altered.
  

  To insert a line in the cust table without entering Ref provider table supp

  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'raj',111);
  
  1 row created.
  

  Line by 1 created successfully (attention this validation is not yet done) because the foreign key constraint is initially deferred.

  Now

  SQL> set constraint fk_cust_supp immediate;
  set constraint fk_cust_supp immediate
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02291: integrity constraint (OWNER.FK_CUST_SUPP) violated - parent key not found
  

  Since Ref no outs in extra table so forced provider violated.

  allows to insert a row in the vendor corresponding with the vendor id in the cust table id

  SQL> insert into supp values(111);
  
  1 row created.
  

  Now, try

  SQL> set constraint fk_cust_supp immediate;
  
  Constraint set.
  

  but now, if you try to insert a row into the table cust without this vendor id in table supp, it give error (since now forced to check from the inserted row, even will not wait for commit)

  SQL>  insert into cust values(3,'bob',222);
   insert into cust values(3,'bob',222)
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02291: integrity constraint (OWNER.FK_CUST_SUPP) violated - parent key not found
  

  Also, in the case of primary key constraints will be checked when you perform VALIDATION, otherwise that it will allow you to insert the second row.

  SQL> alter table cust add constraint cust_id_pk primary key(cust_id)
    2  deferrable initially deferred;
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'raj');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'sam');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'bob');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  commit
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (OWNER.CUST_ID_PK) violated
  
  SQL> 
  

  SQL> drop table cust;
  
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL> create table cust (cust_id number ,cust_name varchar2(25));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> alter table cust add constraint cust_id_pk primary key(cust_id)
    2  deferrable initially deferred;
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> set constraint cust_id_pk immediate;
  
  Constraint set.
  
  SQL> insert into cust values(1,'raj');
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL>  insert into cust values(1,'sam');
   insert into cust values(1,'sam')
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (OWNER.CUST_ID_PK) violated
  
  SQL> 
  

  Published by: Azhar Husain on July 27, 2011 12:01

• Domain related errors

  Hello
  
  We are facing problems from time to time we receive the error:
  
  
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1249: WARN: connect to address //10.0.34.65:20001 MFMDOM failed, error network (10035)
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1304: warning: no longer remote address domain for the remote domain MFMDOM
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1008: ERROR: unable to connect to the remote domain (networkid = < DPKO >); 10035 network error code
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1249: WARN: connect to address //10.0.34.65:20001 MFMDOM failed, error network (10035)
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1304: warning: no longer remote address domain for the remote domain MFMDOM
  GWTDOMAIN.2172.6524.0: LIBGWT_CAT:1008: ERROR: unable to connect to the remote domain (networkid = < DPKO >); 10035 network error code
  
  
  Can anyone suggest what can be wrong?
  
  Thank you
  Tariq

  Hi Tariq,

  You can post the dmconfig of each machine files? Also, what version of Tuxedo do you use and do you run with patch current turnover? Duplicate connection can be caused if each area tries to connect to each other. When appears in the connection of the section, the gateway of the field realizes that there is a link in double and he simply falls. It's essentially a race condition that shouldn't cause any problems. It can be prevented by the presence of a connection policy value ON_STARTUP area and the other in INCOMING_ONLY. In both cases, this should not have caused to the doors of collision domain. If it is reproducible on the current version of Tux with current rolling patch, please open a support case and Oracle support you can intervene through the collection of the data necessary to track down the problem.

  Kind regards
  Todd little
  Chief Architect of Oracle Tuxedo

• 11i on Soalris 10 installation

  Hello
  
  I'm in preparation for the gathering required to install 11.5.10.2 on solaris 10. I went in the note installation and release, but couldn't identify much pre-reqs:
  
  All I got is:
  * SPARC Solaris requirements *.
  
  * This section describes the specific requirements for Solaris SPARC.* *.
  
  
  * Net Service listeners to multiple users facilities *.
  
  * Give all users in a multi-user installation write rights in the directory .oracle: *.
  
  
  * $ chmod 777 /var/tmp/.oracleRotate newspapers Shutdown *.
  
  * If you are having periods of intermittent closure with the rotation of the logs function in Oracle 9iAS, Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2005 for Oracle Application Server apply Kit (patch 4393827) or which replaces patch to fix this... *
  
  
  * Language RDBMS files *.
  
  * If you have installed a 64-bit RDBMS either with a full installation of Oracle Applications version 11.5.10.2 or by using the command "rapidwiz - techstack" to quickly install, you must download and apply patch 5354588 for your version 9.2.0 Oracle maison.* *
  
  
  I couldn't see any OS patches, pre - req or any change in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, no utility download no download of J2SE or any other java.
  
  If someone has installed previosly 11i on solaris 10 box charge then can you please let me know:
  (i) do I need check patches OS, glibc changes or changes in LD_LIBRARY_PATH or other similar things?
  (ii) do I need to install the J2SE/JDK java utility or other?
  (iii) for all changes in/etc/hosts... I belive solaris 10 uses/etc/Project so should I also update that?
  
  If someone did 11.5.10.2 installation on solaris 10, then it would be great if you can share your experience.
  
  Thank you
  -JD-

  Salvation;

  Hi Please check:

  J2SE Solaris Cluster of patches recommended
  http://sunsolve.Sun.com/show.do?target=patches/patch-access

  Check the Readme part

  In docs related installation, Oracle want to use unlimited limit, so it should keep it like that

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• PRIMARY KEY... MAY BE DEFERRED AT THE START...

  Hello... I have some doubts about the "may be DEFERRED to the IMMEDIATE DEPARTURE" and "Can be DELAYED delay"
  
  I think I understand the difference, but I'm not sure... So I write an example for confirmation...
  
  
  PRIMARY KEY (key) can be POSTPONED to the IMMEDIATE DEPARTURE... This is the default... This means:
  1. I insert a new row in the table.
  2. it checks if I can insert these lines.
  3. it performs the VALIDATION.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  PRIMARY KEY (key) can be POSTPONED to the DELAYED START means:
  1. I insert a line of one of the table;
  2. I do the COMMIT;
  3 check if I can insert a line of thos.
  
  
  That's right?
  
  
  Thank you

  PRIMARY KEY (key) can be POSTPONED to the IMMEDIATE DEPARTURE... This is the default... This means:

  Here the constraint is evaluated immediately once insertion is performed.

  SQL> create table t1(no integer primary key deferrable initially immediate)
    2  /
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> insert into t1 values (1)
    2  /
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into t1 values (1)
    2  /
  insert into t1 values (1)
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (KARTHICK_PATTABIRAMAN.SYS_C0022217) violated
  

  PRIMARY KEY (key) can be POSTPONED to the DELAYED START means:

  Here, the constraint is evaluated when you perform VALIDATION.

  SQL> drop table t1
    2  /
  
  Table dropped.
  
  SQL> create table t1(no integer primary key deferrable initially deferred)
    2  /
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> insert into t1 values (1)
    2  /
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> insert into t1 values (1)
    2  /
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit
    2  /
  commit
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (KARTHICK_PATTABIRAMAN.SYS_C0022218) violated
  

• Autocommit DDL: difference between SQL and SQL Developer * more?

  I asked this in the SQL forum (commit auto DDL: difference between developer SQL and command-line client?), but it has suggested it might be a problem in SQL Developer, so I thought I would ask here.
  
  I'm trying to understand what exactly happens when an error occurs when a transaction is committed because of a DDL statement. I noticed that with SQL Developer, if the DDL statement CREATE TABLE, the statement is executed, even if the DML statements which I entered before CREATE TABLE violates a deferred constraint, so that the transaction fails. In SQL * Plus, it's not the case: the table is not created. I have no automatic validation. I'm using Oracle 10 g XE.
  
  That's what happens in SQL * more:

  SQL> create table table1(a number);
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> alter table table1 add constraint table1_a_uq unique(a) deferrable initially deferred;
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> insert into table1 values(1);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> insert into table1 values(1);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> create table table2(b number);
  create table table2(b number)
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (BOEK.TABLE1_A_UQ) violated
  
  
  SQL> select * from table2;
  select * from table2
                *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  If I put the same code in SQL Developer (versions 1.5.5 and 2.1.0.63), the table is created.
  This is my script:

  create table table1(a number);
  alter table table1 add constraint table1_a_uq unique(a) deferrable initially deferred;
  insert into table1 values(1);
  commit;
  insert into table1 values(1);
  create table table2(b number);
  select * from table2;

  And this is the output of SQL Developer:

  create table succeeded.
   alter table table1 succeeded.
  1 rows inserted
  commited
  1 rows inserted
  
  Error starting at line 9 in command:
  create table table2(b number)
  Error report:
  SQL Error: ORA-02091: transaction rolled back
  ORA-00001: unique constraint (BOEK.TABLE1_A_UQ) violated
  02091. 00000 -  "transaction rolled back"
  *Cause:    Also see error 2092. If the transaction is aborted at a remote
             site then you will only see 2091; if aborted at host then you will
             see 2092 and 2091.
  *Action:   Add rollback segment and retry the transaction.
  B                      
  ---------------------- 
  
  0 rows selected

  As you can see, the table is created in SQL Developer, but not in SQL * more.
  
  I wonder why it's different.

  Well Yes, it is a slightly different situation, because you issue 1 statement that executes internally 2 statements.
  But the problem is the same: the error handling. Where sqlplus rejects again (implicit) statements, sqldev goes ahead and runs them anyway. Personally, I'd say sqldev is more consistent and sqlplus is not, because run the following instructions (explicit).

  Kind regards
  K.

• ORA-00481 and Patch 3659289 - how to check if the patch has been applied? --

  Dear all,
  
  Currently my client uses the oracle 10.2.0.4.0 database (RAC). However sometimes during treatment (the application attempts to write/change data), they are several ORA-00481 errors and then the database crashed. But I'd say it's an automatic restart sort of as the newspaper has said.
  
  Trying to get on a few articles on this subject and found one saying this is due to internal bugs, and the problem solved with patch 3659289 .
  
  So far, I couldn't find much information about this hotfix (3659289) and I need some help here.
  
  1. I wonder if it is the case of my customer database?
  2. how to check if this specific hotfix (3659289) has been applied?
  3. be appreciate if you have access to this patch and post the details here.
  
  Advise, Suggestion or jokes will be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  CT
  
  
  
  Some additional information:
  1 version of oracle 10.2.0.4.0 database
  
  Connected to:
  Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit
  With the Real Application Clusters option
  
  2 CARS with two nodes.
  
  3. in the course of running on Solaris 10 sparc infrastructure.
  
  4. what error log says:
  
  Sun Dec 4 00:51:09 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms1_16541.trc file:
  Sun Dec 4 00:51:34 2011
  Track of dumping performs id = [cdmp_20111204003639]
  Sun Dec 4 00:52:03 2011
  kkjcre1p: unable to reproduce the jobq slave process
  Sun Dec 4 00:52:04 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_cjq0_16598.trc file:
  
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:58 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lmon_16525.trc file:
  ORA-29740: expelled by Member 1, group incarnation 74
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_j002_14521.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_j000_29799.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  WARNING: inbound connections has expired (ORA-3136)
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_j003_15093.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lck0_16841.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_pmon_16519.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms3_16549.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:54:59 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_psp0_16523.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:00 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms5_16557.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:00 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms4_16553.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:01 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lmd0_16527.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:01 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms0_16537.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:01 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump/xxxxx1_lms1_16541.trc file:
  ORA-00481: LMON process ended with the error
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:01 2011
  RECO: termination litigation because of the error 481
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:07 2011
  Instance terminated by RECO, pid = 16588
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:18 2011
  Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
  LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
  LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
  Interface type 1 bge2 configured 10.0.2.0 from OCR to serve a cluster interconnect
  Type 1 202.76.5.0 configured OCR bge0 interface to be used as a public interface
  SNA system picked latch-free 3
  Autotune undo retention is enabled.
  LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
  SYS audit is disabled
  ksdpec: called to the event 13740 before initialization of the event group
  Commissioning ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.4.0.
  Parameters of the system with default values:
  process = 300
  sessions = 500
  SGA_MAX_SIZE = 5368709120
  __shared_pool_size = 1879048192
  shared_pool_size = 1073741824
  __large_pool_size = 16777216
  LARGE_POOL_SIZE = 16777216
  __java_pool_size = 134217728
  JAVA_POOL_SIZE = 134217728
  __streams_pool_size = 0
  SHARED_POOL_RESERVED_SIZE = 142606336
  SPFile = +DATA/xxxxx/spfilexxxxx.ora
  SGA_TARGET = 5368709120
  control_files = +DATA/xxxxx/controlfile/current.258.702223445
  DB_BLOCK_SIZE = 8192
  __db_cache_size = 3288334336
  db_cache_size = 3221225472
  compatible = 10.2.0.1.0
  Log_archive_dest = + REDOARCH/xxxxx/archlog
  log_buffer = 30543360
  db_file_multiblock_read_count = 16
  cluster_database = TRUE
  cluster_database_instances = 2
  db_create_file_dest = + DATA
  db_create_online_log_dest_1 = + REDOARCH
  db_recovery_file_dest_size = 2147483648
  = 1 thread
  instance_number = 1
  UNDO_MANAGEMENT = AUTO
  undo_tablespace = UNDOTBS1
  UNDO_RETENTION = 14400
  Remote_login_passwordfile = EXCLUSIVE lock
  db_domain =
  dispatchers = (PROTOCOL = TCP) (SERVICE = xxxxxXDB)
  LOCAL_LISTENER = LISTENER_xxxxx1
  remote_listener = LISTENERS_xxxxx
  session_cached_cursors = 100
  JOB_QUEUE_PROCESSES = 10
  CURSOR_SHARING = SIMILAR
  background_dump_dest = / opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/bdump
  user_dump_dest = / opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/udump
  core_dump_dest = / opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/cdump
  audit_file_dest = / opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/adump
  db_name = xxxxx
  open_cursors = 500
  pga_aggregate_target = 1073741824
  Communication of cluster is configured to use the following interfaces for this instance
  10.0.2.235
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:25 2011
  cluster interconnect IPC version: Oracle UDP/IP (generic)
  CPI for the seller 1 proto 2
  PMON started with pid = 2, OS id = 19662
  DIAG started with pid = 3, OS id = 19664
  PSP0 started with pid = 4, OS id = 19666
  LMON started with pid = 5, OS id = 19668
  LMD0 started with pid = 6, OS id = 19670
  LMS0 started with pid = 7, OS id = 19672
  LMS1 started with pid = 8, OS id = 19676
  LMS2 started with pid = 9, OS id = 19688
  LMS3 started with pid = 10, OS id = 19692
  LMS4 started with pid = 11, OS id = 19696
  LMS5 started with pid = 12, OS id = 19700
  MA started with pid = 13, OS id = 19704
  DBW0 started with pid = 14, OS id = 19706
  DBW1 started with pid = 15, OS id = 19708
  DBW2 started with pid = 16, OS id = 19718
  LGWR started with pid = 17, OS id = 19720
  CKPT started with pid = 18, OS id = 19722
  SMON started with pid = 19, OS id = 19724
  RECCE has started with pid = 20, OS id = 19726
  CJQ0 started with pid = 21, OS id = 19728
  MMON started with pid = 22, OS id = 19730
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:28 2011
  commissioning 1 dispatcher (s) for '(ADDRESS =(PARTIAL=YES) (PROTOCOL = TCP))' network address...
  MMNL started with pid = 23, OS id = 19732
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:28 2011
  commissioning or shared server 1...
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:28 2011
  DISM started, OS id = 19746
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:52 2011
  LMON recorded with NM - 1 instance id (internal mem not 0)
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Reconfiguration began (old Inc. 0, Inc. new, 78)
  List of nodes:
  0 1
  Global Resource Directory frozen
  allocate domain 0, invalid = TRUE
  Restored communication channels
  * field validates according to the instance 1 0
  * domain 0 valid = 1 according to instance 1
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Diffuse master hash resource bitmaps
  Blocks of non-local process cleaned
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Shadows GCS LMS 0 0: cancelled, 0 closed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Cancelled LMS shadows SCM 4: 0, 0 closed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Cancelled LMS shadows GCS 3: 0, 0 closed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Cancelled LMS shadows GCS 1: 0, 0 closed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Cancelled LMS shadows BSC 5: 0, 0 closed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Cancelled LMS shadows SCM 2: 0, 0 closed
  Set of master node info
  Subject to all requests for remote enqueue
  DWN-cvts replayed, questionable VALBLKs
  All enqueues grant awarded
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  LMS crossed shadows 5: 0, replayed 0 GCS
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  LMS crossed shadows 3: 0, replayed 0 GCS
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Crossed shadows SCM 2: 0, replayed 0 LMS
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  LMS 0: 0 GCS shadows traveled 0 replayed
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Crossed shadows SCM 4: 0, replayed 0 LMS
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  LMS crossed shadows 1: 0, replayed 0 GCS
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:53 2011
  Subject to all requests for remote-cache GCS
  Post SMON start 1 IR pass
  Fix write in SCM resources
  Reconfiguration complete
  LCK0 started with pid = 26, OS id = 19984
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:55 2011
  Oracle Data Guard is not available in this edition of Oracle.
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:55 2011
  ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:56 2011
  From FILIPE background process
  FILIPE started with pid = 28, OS id = 19995
  From RBAL background process
  RBAL started with pid = 29, OS id = 19999
  Sun Dec 4 00:55:59 2011
  SUCCESS: diskgroup DATA has been mounted
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:03 2011
  Assessment target incarnation to 7
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:04 2011
  Mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 3288132717
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:04 2011
  Database mounted in shared Mode (CLUSTER_DATABASE = TRUE)
  Completed: ALTER DATABASE MOUNT
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:05 2011
  ALTER DATABASE OPEN
  Selected broadcast the validation schema to generate notifications SNA
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:06 2011
  LGWR: FROM PROCESS ARCH
  Arc0 started with pid = 33, OS id = 20135
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:06 2011
  Arc0: Started archiving
  Arc1: Started archiving
  LGWR: FROM PROCESS ARCH COMPLETE
  Arc1 started with pid = 34, OS id = 20137
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:06 2011
  SUCCESS: diskgroup REDOARCH rose
  Thread 1 is open to the sequence of journal 23830
  Currently Journal # 3 seq # 23830 mem # 0: +REDOARCH/xxxxx/onlinelog/group_3.261.709928305
  Opening of redo thread 1
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:07 2011
  SMON: enabling cache recovery
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:07 2011
  Arc0: become the "no FAL' ARCH
  Arc0: become the "no SRL" ARCH
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:07 2011
  Arc1: Become the heartbeat ARCH
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:09 2011
  Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 1.
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:09 2011
  SMON: enabling the recovery of tx
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:09 2011
  Database charset is UTF8
  off replication_dependency_tracking (no replication multimaster async found)
  From QMNC background process
  QMNC started with pid = 35, OS id = 20185
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:15 2011
  Errors in the /opt/app/oracle/admin/xxxxx/udump/xxxxx1_ora_20121.trc file:
  ORA-00604: an error has occurred at the SQL level 1 recursive
  ORA-12663: Services required by the customer not available on the server
  ORA-36961: Oracle OLAP is not available.
  ORA-06512: at "SYS." OLAPIHISTORYRETENTION', line 1
  ORA-06512: at line 15 level
  Sun Dec 4 00:56:15 2011
  Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN

  Hi, Eric.

  Sory for these last response time.

  If you are looking for a special patch that is exists or not, you must run below

  ORACLE_HOME and ORACLE_SID and opatch as mention in my previous post, that it is the value

  lsinventory opatch | grep patch_no

  If she reports record than his average you past. If its does not provide that the problem is that you do not have this patch

  Respect of
  HELIOS

• ORA-20099: E-Business Suite Edition Patch does not exis

  Hi all

  EBS R12.2

  RHEL 6

  After that we encunter the fluctuation of power, our server is working. After the power is restored, we started our EBS and the server, the following error throws up:

  [root@crp2 ~] # su - applcrp2

  Information on the E-Business Suite environment

  ----------------------------------------

  EXECUTION of the file system: / home/applcrp2/CRP2/fs2/EBSapps/appl

  PATCH file system: / home/applcrp2/CRP2/fs1/EBSapps/appl

  Non-Editioned filesystem: / home/applcrp2/CRP2/fs_ne

  DB host: crp2.oracle.amti.com.ph Service/SID: CRP2

  Supply of the file system to RUN...

  [applcrp2@crp2 ~] $ sqlplus apps/apps

  SQL * more: version 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Jul 21 12:46:16 2015

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

  ERROR:

  ORA-00604: an error has occurred at the SQL level 1 recursive

  ORA-20099: E-Business Suite Edition Patch does not exist.

  ORA-06512: at line 29

  Our EBS is corrupt?

  Help, please...

  Thank you very much

  JC

  I suggest below

  env 1.) source for the patch file system

  2.) adoption PHASE = CUTOVER. This will make Patch file system run the file system.

  3.) start the application, make sure that everything is more recent and correct.

  4.) adopt PHASE = FS_CLONE - this will copy the file system to run on the patch file system.

  This can get your EBS.

  Now, why this happened can not say, R12 itself that we had seen corruption in the config files as those who wrote whenever you stop.

  and I would suggest good get rescued food and raise SR too if you want to dig the question

  concerning

  Pravin

• SDO ORA-00904 identifier valid after patch 20544696 and 20225988 (CPU Apr 15)

  The seller of our web mapping system uses a syntax that contains the identifier SDO_GEOM. SDO_GEOMETRY and similar. An example simplified using the point constructor ODD as in...
  Select sdo_geom.sdo_geometry (2001, 81989, sdo_geom.sdo_point_type (531599, 184530, null), null, null) double;

  This syntax has stopped working in the TEST database, after I applied the patches April 2015 CPU. It generates an ORA-00904: "SDO_GEOM. "" SDO_GEOMETRY ': identifier not valid, which in fact I was expecting. The package SDO_GEOM in schema MDSYS, often referenced without the option scheme by the public synonym, do not contain a type or function SDO_GEOMETRY. I've never used this syntax and wrote instead...

  Select mdsys.sdo_geometry (2001, 81989, mdsys.sdo_point_type (531599, 184530, null), null, null) double;

  .. of course, who continues to work. However, to my surprise, I found that the syntax of the provider, which generates the ORA-00904 in all databases of fix post, works perfectly well in all our pre patch databases.

  Is the same for all other types in the MDSYS (SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY, SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY...) schema.

  I'm dealing with the strange situation where I not only understand why something has stopped working; first of all I do not understand why the syntax of the seller has already worked.

  We are using Oracle 11.2.0.4 EE with Oracle Spatial on Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit. Patches that have been requested are

  1) patch 20544696: WINDOWS DB BUNDLE PATCH 11.2. 0.4.15
  2) patch 20225988: WINDOWS ORACLE JAVAVM COMPONENT BUNDLE PATCH 11.2. 0.4.3

  Kind regards

  Torsten

  Hi Torsten,

  Well, here you have a kind of strange thing Oracle Spatial.  If you told me that

  SELECT SDO_GEOM.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 81989, SDO_GEOM.SDO_POINT_TYPE(531599, 184530, NULL), NULL, NULL) FROM dual;
  

  is a valid statement, I'd say of course not. But on my production server which is the power supply 11.2.0.4.5, it works!

  However, on a 12 c test server it does not work.

  

  All I can say is that you are right in everything you say.  Oracle has removed everything that made this weird syntax once the work and it seems that the PSU April stops for good.  Your provider needs to fix things and perhaps address why they used such a weird thing in the first place.

  Like you I don't see what makes this function on 11g.  There is no synonym that I see.  And if wrap you it in an anonymous block fails

  DECLARE
     foo SDO_GEOMETRY;
  BEGIN
     SELECT SDO_GEOM.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,81989,SDO_GEOM.SDO_POINT_TYPE(531599,184530,NULL),NULL,NULL)
     INTO foo
     FROM dual;
  END;
  /
  

  Strange thing indeed.  I guess there could be a wider discussion here on what patches are in turn brought in 11g and if the side effects are always worth.

  See you soon,.

  Paul

• Strange behaviour of 11.1.2.3.500 PSU roll back patch - planning an application does not work

  Hi all

  Recently, I applied the patch to POWER 500 block for all products of the EMP. Everything works fine without any problems.

  One of my users not to start the Regional through JAVA 1.7 service Console, that i have applied EAS PSU 500. Here the problem starts after that, none of the user was unable to connect essbase server through eas. They get "error: 105: connection with a token at MaxlJni.

  So thought of reversing all the patches (block of POWER 500 & 500 EAS)

  (1) roll supported by block of POWER 500 patch successfully without any problems.

  1.1) strange question - rear roller command works even for 500 EAS.

  (2) restart the Services

  (3) for the navigation of the app, I had a lot of mistakes for EPMA components. Then I deleted the folder Temp and Cache of the domain directory and restarted the service. Still, I get the below error.

  At the opening of the planning application, I got info like"the version of the application is not the latest version. The existing release. "11.1.2.3.500, release date: 11.1.2.3.

  Don't know how to decline the superior to the inferior version planning application, normally we will do the upgrade process, I am familiar with that one. There is no information in this respect in the Patch document.

  Could you please suggest me in this situation?

  Thank you

  CP

  You have the slashes in the wrong direction for windows, try:

  Restaurant opatch.bat - id 17529887 - oh D:\Oracle\Middleware\EPMSystem11R1 - jre D:\Oracle\Middleware\jdk160_35

  See you soon

  John

  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/