Performance issues after 7 to 9

Similar Questions

• Performance issues after upgrade to view 5 on Windows 7

  I'm having a lot of performance problems after upgraded to vSphere 5 and 5 view connecting using PCoIP.  Interaction with the virtual machine are slower with either double or single monitor.  I tried all solutions different workaround proposed on the site of Teradici.  If someone has bugs or suggestions about how do to clear up things please answer.

  Add the following line in the vm config file.

  mks.poll.headlessRates = 1000 100 2

  It should solve your PCoIP lag problems, let me know what your results are.

• Aspire v15 performance issues after installing the MS updates

  I bought my Aspire V15 over three weeks and I'm very happy with it.  Last weekend, I began to have problems of performance, characterized by the mouse becomes very erratic, for example paste and then jump to a new location.  I did a bit of investigation and I think that the problem began to occur in the last round of updates MS was installed on my machine.  I found that about 18 updates were applied the last time that the system has been updated.  Today, I deleted all the and the machine works fine now.

  Everyone knows something similar?

  Kind regards

  try to install this:

  http://global-download.Acer.com/GDFiles/driver/AMT/AMT_Intel_10.0.30.1054_W81x64_A.zip?acerid=635567...

  or uninstall Intel AMT

• Performance issues after you add pictures to the library

  Howdy,

  I am still getting my feet wet with LR2.5 and so far I really like it. It's absolutely great for my workflow.

  Previously, my library consisted of about 1500 images, and using the mode developing has been super fast with the adjustment brush and Gradient of the adjustment. I would click on a RAW image that I had modified, and it would be the load almost instantly. Over the weekend, I added about 30,000 files in my library of LR2.5 and noticed that help develop mode was suddenly slow dog. On film, I have to click on an image that I had already edited with the adjustment brush, and it would take 10 ~ 30 seconds to load. If I went to the next time on film using the arrow keys, it would take as long to load this image if I had worked on that. If I chose a picture I had not worked on, he would load in a second or two. However, if I started to use the adjustment brush, I'd get long waiting periods before my changes would be present. It got to the point where it became unbearable to work on images.

  To try to solve the problem, I restarted my iMac (2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, OS 10.6.1, 4 GB RAM, 1 TB of internal disk, 2.5 to external hard drives), optimized, has increased the size of the Cache of 1 GB to 5 GB, but none of this makes much difference. In the end, I removed the 30 000 images that I had added, and all was well again. I know that LR2.5 can manage hundreds of thousands of photos easily, then why am I having problems with it? I wish I could add all my images to the library. Are there settings I should change to improve performance?

  Thank you for your time and answers.

  The f

  It's this stupid forum moronically software. who eats the answers by e-mail.

  Yes - Look under the menu LIBRARY. I'm not in front of my right to LR

  now, but there should be an option on the topic "OVERVIEWS". one

  suboption must "RENDER". Select all THE PHOTOS and choose

  LIBRARY, previews, RENDER (or similar wording).

• Performance issue of SAP with Oracle 10 on Sun SPARC T5240 server

  Dear friends,
  
  We have a performance issue after the migration of our basic system of SAP ERP 6.0. To new servers, we moved a month ago.
  The report of EarlyWatchAlert SAP response time of CPU is too high, although the CPU utilization is never more than 5%,
  
  The current system is:
  
  Database server: Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 Server - 2 CPU´s with 6 core wire 8, 1.2 Ghz 32 GB RAM
  and we use a different identical server configured as an application server.
  
  Database is Oracle 10.2.0 and Solaris 10 operating system.
  
  The problem is CPU average response time is 450 ms and maximum CPU load is 5% percent.
  
  Configuration prior to migration with the old servers, we got the answer of CPU: 150 ms and max CPU load: 50%.
  Old configuration: 2 X HP rp3440, 2 X PA 8800 (2 core, 1.0 GHz) CPU.
  
  You have experience with a similar situation, setting that could be bad for server CPU´s not making full use?
  or you know any similar configuration for benchmark?
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  Uzan

  The new server's processors in Niagara? If so you could run in the known performance issue identified in MOS Doc 781763.1 (Migration of fast single machine threaded CPU to CMT UltraSPARC T1 and T2 causes an increase in the CPU reports)

  HTH
  Srini

• Smartphone blackBerry Storm performance issues (and suggestions)

  I want to start and say that I don't like my phone.  When it works (which is most of the time), it works fine.

  But there are certainly problems of software.  As a software engineer, the OS has some memory serious management problems.  This seems to cause most of the problems I'm having with the phone.  I'm running the latest Verizon S/W (v4.7.0.148).

  Problem #1:

  I am a paranoid person.  There are a lot of personal information on my phone, I have currently international calls helped that I need this feature.  So to protect me my phone is locked when it is the case or after a period of inactivity time.  It is a good practice.  Part of the draw to the fate of the Blackberry is the security that you can configure on the device (I'm not paranoid enough to allow all the protections of encryption - yet).  Problem of the storm is that it can take 1 to 5 minutes to get the phone unlocked when unholstering.  It is not an exaggeration.  As the performance of the memory gets worse, time takes more time.  If I had to make an emergency call, it could be the difference between life and death.  5 minutes is a long time to wait to call 911.  This must be corrected!

  Problem #2:

  The phone must be "reset" once a day to remember "lost."  It is just poor programming.  I don't know if this problem of BB OS or Apps I'm running, but in both cases, this isn't fair.  After the reboot if I go to the display of memory under options I could have about 3-5 MB of free memory.  After a few hours of use, this will almost always '0 '.  I installed MemoryUp Pro, which seems to have extended the period of time between the battery grips, but I still don't think we should ask all owners of BB Storm to pull there battery once a day.  The other answer I get is "do not run so many Apps.  I get all my applications when finished.  Are the only ones that I continue to turn: Blackberry Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, Google Talk and Google Maps (Latitude).  Other applications running, you can't get out (phone, browser).  I tried doesn't work is not the 'optional' tricks and performance has not really much better.

  Problem #3:

  Missed calls.  This is probably related to problems of memory above, but if the storm can be used as a phone, then I should buy something else.  Although the occurrence of this problem has gone down because I installed MemoryUp Pro and perform the reset once a day, sometimes still about 1 to 5 times.  It takes so long for the phone to 'wake up' when a call comes in (especially if it is holstered), at the time where I hit "Answer", a call has been Messaging voice or even worse, the phone doesn't ring at all.  All I get is a notification of appeal lacks the 'unknown number '.

  Problem #4:

  Battery performance could be improved.  The battery that comes with the storm has about 24 hours on 24 with the Radio and Bluetooth.  Really, this isn't a problem if you know it.  I solved the problem by buying a 2700 mAh battery for extended life of BoxWave I use when traveling.  Makes the storm bit bulky, it will give me 2-3 days of life.  I don't know how this could be improved if not

  I hope that the developers of RIM are trying to solve some of these performance issues.  Certain tasks should be a higher priority as they seem to have (like phone & Unlock).

  Sean

  Here is the link...

  http://www.BlackBerryForums.com/General-9500-series-discussion-storm/196496-latest-9530-OS-4-7-0-208...

• Performance issues HTML Article in the Adobe Viewer on iPad

  I created an HTML Article using DPS, but when I get to post it on the Adobe in iPad viewer content does not scroll smoothly and the content is cut and cropped (the entire page is not displayed), it is very judery and struggles to make the HTML below "the fold" so to speak.

  I tried two import HTML options in DPS and both have the same isuues of performance/gal.

  I have a video in my HTML code, which seemed to be causing a problem where the video streaming was struggling to be pulled through, so I have treid YouTube and Vimeo video streaming and performance/display problem is not resolved. I then tried embbeding a mp4 directly using HTML5 to see if it was a connection/band bandwidth issue and the problem persists. However the videos play, it's just the fact that the container is cropped in half.

  Sometimes the HTML item makes it, but then when you scan save the page he struggles to render the above content? Also, then when drag you to the bottom of the page content is also cultivated that was visible before?

  I went through every discussion available on the Adobe community and other resources, but all of the mentioned patches have no effect.

  If anyone can help or knows the same problems any advise would be welcome.

  Article HTML contains some JS too, it is not working properly, but I was wondering if JS causes problems? Just a thought.

  Well, I think I can find the answer so I thought I would share with the community incase anyone who knows the same type of questions.

  After testing another piece of HTML that also included the video in streaming and JavaScript heavy, I have narrowed the question to my JS. I had two Nivo Slider carousels which were the road to performance issues.

  The other test HTML Article scrolls smoothly and video shoots as expected, although from time to time there is a slight delay in the page to scroll up and down, but it's barely noticeable.

  I hope it can be useful to others in the future?

• Chrome performance issues.

  Hello!

  I have problems with my animated movie in Chrome. On faster machines it does not play smoothly on those slower it stucks on certain points. In firefox, everything goes well.

  Animation has great graphics. I noticed Firefox lowers the quality of the animated elements when they move. Chrome does not, but the performance is to kill the idea of rich animation.

  Is it possible (perhaps some hacks?) to lower the quality of the animation in Chrome? Or to boost performance? I'm sure that this issue is not related to the GPU acceleration (it is on the time stucks animation).

  Here is the animation:

  http://aiac.pl/Info

  Thanks in advance.

  Artur.

  BANG! His work after the publication on the new version of the edge. graphic files 56, three nested symbols simultaneously play a calendar and many elements of text. Also several different functions of acceleration. Its all working now in Chrome. It has been also works well in Firefox before and now

  I'm very excited, because I thought that the project is lost due to incompatibility of Chrome. I got a little scared by updating I have to enter the number of series or something, but not... It is still free exceptional tool!

  FOR ANYONE WITH PERFORMANCE ISSUES - check your animations with the new version (1.5).

• Untangled RoboSource slow performance issues

  Hi all
  
  I'm a noob-Robo (noobie, novice, etc.) but not new computers and databases and others. We have a team of 5 authors are all working on separate projects but under even version RoboSource Control. We know some questions serious performance: projects can take over an hour to check outside or inside. not all users can see projects; "Rename" do not get rid of the old actually prefer a copy under the new name (?); etc.
  
  I'm trying to 'normal' basic behavior for RoboSource Control as well as some best practices for multiple users. I wonder if there is something more in depth to describe the RoboSource Control engine and possibly maintenance tasks to help what seems to be a jumble of nodes that are not all necessary, too many users "admin", etc. I expect that the "cleansing" will solve many of our problems.
  
  So, rather than go in each problem in the forum, I prefer to find the right resource and to tackle this thing by iteration.
  
  Thanks for your useful suggestions
  
  Don

  I wanted to update the forum about this performance issue. After further investigation, we note that serving PC server worked for 6 months without interruption. In addition, she has 512 MB of RAM, but the ROBOSOURCECONTROL service consumed 350 MB of it. The rest of the system resources were probably permutation are busy. A reboot which is brightened and RSC performance is splendid - from 30 to 60 minutes, until about 15 seconds for a GET or a check-in.
  We suspect there is a memory leak in CSS, but I can start a separate thread for some tips on how to identify and report a bug for this package.

  Thank you all

  Don

• Performance issues at the opening of business rule

  Hello
  
  We work in collaboration with Hyperion version 9.2.1 and we have performance issues when opening the business rules. I have analyzed the issue and discovered that it has something to do with the assignment of access privileges to the rule.
  
  The authorisation scheme looks like as follows:
  
  User A is assigned to the group G1
  User B is assigned to the Group G2
  Group G1 is assigned to the XYZ group
  Group is assigned to the XYZ group G2
  Group XYZ is the owner of the 'basic user' delivery to the planning application.
  
  Without attributing any unrestricted access the rule company opens immediately.
  By assigning the privilege to access the group G1/G2 (post or get) the business rule opens immediately.
  By assigning access privilege to the XYZ group the business rule opens after 2-5 minutes.
  
  Anyone has an idea why this happens and how to fix this?
  
  Kind regards
  ULI
  
  Edited by: user13110201 the 12.05.2010 04:31

  This was a problem with the business rules for quite some time. Oracle made front and rear markets in later versions than yours; and they have issued patches address, if it is not completely solved the problem. Finally things seem to be much better in 11.1.1.3, although YMMV.

• DB performance issue

  Hi friends,
  
  We know the performance issue with our applications/database oracle.
  
  I run the OEM and I got the following charts in the report:
  http://farm3.static.Flickr.com/2447/3613769336_1b142c9dd.jpg?v=0
  http://farm4.static.Flickr.com/3411/3612950303_1f83a9f20.jpg?v=0
  http://farm4.static.Flickr.com/3411/3612950303_1f83a9f20.jpg?v=0
  
  Is there evidence that these cards can give re: performance problem?
  What other charts in OEM who can help solve or give assistance performance problem?
  
  Thank you very much in advance

  ytterp2009 wrote:
  Thank you Charles,.

  The server has 16 GB of Ram... way means that, due to limitations of 32-bit on windows only 4 GB of Ram was used and the 12 remaining GB is inactive?
  What is the proper way to tune?

  There are restrictions on how the memory beyond 4 GB can be used by Oracle. As far as I know, the memory is reserved for the buffer cache.

  Not all memory below the 4 GB limit is available for programs. Some of this memory is laid out in memory of the device, such as the video cards, RAID cache on board, etc., and some of the memory Windows is needed to track the objects window, icons, etc. Although it is possible to back up 2 GB per process limit to 3 GB, making Windows limit to use for its own purposes the memory that remains after the memory is drawn to embedded devices, and I think that the Oracle Metalink site does not recommend trying to go up the by the limit process completely to 3 GB. And this low by the process boundary should be reserved for the memory window. Your current value of pga_aggregate_target should be checked, because there is no way that the apparent present value could enter into the available memory.

  I agree with Martin - the best way to take full advantage of the memory is to pass on a 64-bit platform. Most, if not all the memory limit headaches disappear on a 64-bit platform. Of Windows 2003 Standard edition supports up to 32 GB of memory, this could be an option for you. It may or may not be a huge effort, but this means system loss of time (which can be considered a reason to call it a huge effort). You will probably find that the server, if less then three years, will support a 64 bit version of the operating system, but check the 64-bit versions of all the drivers are available and consider replacing hard disks containing the operating system if you need to return to the current operating system.

  Charles Hooper
  IT Manager/Oracle DBA
  K & M-making Machine, Inc.

• Qosmio F50 issues after update Bios 1.50

  Hello

  I have updated Bios version 1.50.
  I work with audio software and I noticed the performance issue (about 15%-20% performance reduction!).
  Operational front is also strange.

  Now, I can not turn off the lights or start Media center or something else.

  How can I downgrade the Bios Version 1.30?
  Winphlash doesn't let me do that.

  Help, please!

  Thank you

  May not be the answer you are looking for, but have you tried to do a restore of the software? Remember to back up everything!

• HP Elitebook 8570p - Windows XP USB very slow and the transfer rate performance issues.

  Hello. I was wondering if anyone else knows some performance issues with the HP Elitebook 8570p and Windows XP Pro - SP3.

  I get a VERY slow start, general poor performance (waiting time when opening files and programs).

  I asked to burn in tests that show that everything is good.

  USB transfer rates are VERY slow (tried all ports of a Seagate FreeAgent USB drive, which works fine on other laptops etc.) for example a 30-minute transfer a 7gig single file of the USB HD on the desktop. Only 3 minutes to do the same on another laptop.

  I think there are problems with the drivers, like Windows 7 works very well and does boot from a bootable USB.

  USB transfer rate are also good when starting from a Windows boot environment.

  I installed HP SoftPaq Download Manager, and all the drivers are up to date.

  Hello:

  I think outside of the box here... Select the Intel (r) 7 Series Chipset Family SATA AHCI Controller instead.

  If it does not, I raise the white flag.

  Paul

• Performance issues when coming out of sleep

  I recently built a gaming PC. On Christmas day, I finished putting the thing together. It has an Intel i7-4790 CPU running Intel HD Graphics, 8 GB of Corsair Vengeance RAM, an Asus Z97 - A Mobo and a 2 terabyte Seagate HDD. I installed Windows and put everything in place. Then a week later, my MSI GTX 970 arrived in the mail.

  So, I take the thing to sleep and decreases the performance of the whole thing. Videos YouTube stutter, simple as games fight of World of Tanks to run at its usual rate of 60 fps. To avoid this, I simply restart my comp and then it works fine. performance is back to normal.

  A few weeks, Windows gave me a message on one of the Nvidia drivers causing performance issues when you wake up from sleep. I don't think a lot of it and rejected it. I'll try to reinstall all my Nvidia drivers. I uninstall the Intel HD graphics driver a few days ago and has not changed anything. I would appreciate an answer to this problem because I would like to continue to use the "sleep mode" because it consumes less energy and prolongs the life of my case of LED. Thank you!

  In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

  If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

  
  

  Please run the trace when you encounter the problem

• Bug report: Power Manager causes performance slowed after resume from hibernation

  I use Windows 7 and several versions of the power manager, including the last 6.63.1 of a 220 X.

  If I Hibernate the computer, when I'm back, everything is very slow. For example, it takes several seconds for a page to display after clicking a tab in Chrome, but it's just an example, almost everything is unresponsive. This happens for about 5-10 min, but eventually everything will work normally. It seems to be related to the use of high page files. More I wait to take over after the hibernation, the biggest problem seems to be taking.

  The deactivation of the service to be able to eat has not corrected the problem, but after uninstalling the power manager, the problem will disappear completely.

  I've seen several reports of that of others. This person, it connects to Power Manager, but does not give many details.

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/Windows_7-performance/unresponsive-after-resume-fro...

  This person is also connected Power Manager, but gives a description of how he did, which can be useful for you.

  http://asqueella.blogspot.com/2012/07/Windows-7-resuming-from-hibernation-is.html

  I have reinstalled Power Manager, because the computer is unusable after hibernation. I love the program, however, so it would be nice if you can solve this problem.

  Best wishes

  Justin

  Justin_KM,

  I have discussed this with the Power Manager team and they think that this problem can occur because of a feature called Fast Hibernation summary power manager.  The idea is that Power Manager will page out most application on the drive memory before hibernation.  Then the hibernation file will be as small as possible, resulting in a faster recovery time.  But I guess it can cause this side effect, you found if several applications are page in a lot of memory, disk, after sleep.  Then you would end up with the use of the disc heavy and slow application performance, until finally the memory is restored from pagefile.

  Anyway, if you want to retry Power Manager, please install the latest version and then apply this reg file to disable the feature that we believe that your problem is initially:

  https://DL.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62276273/DisableFastHibernationResume.reg

  Restart after applying the reg file.  This assumes that you are running 64-bit Windows.  If you are running 32-bit Windows, let me know and I'll give you a different reg file.