Peripheral issues DAQ

Hello:

I need syncronize AO and DO it on a DAQ hardware.
I think the USB-63XX (for example USB-6341) series, which has clocked and probably cheaper than the series PCI.

I checked this example: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/EBD603683446EC13862575B3006A63A2 , which makes the things to do in clock is the sample of the OD clock.
(the website shows that this example applies to PCI-series)

What I don't know, is this kind of common clocks supported by most of the call with outputs digital DAQ hardware?

Thank you very much
js777

Hi js777,.

You talk about synchronization sample such as mentioned in the article in your message. This type of synchronization is supported on most of the DAQ hardware. Please see the following links for a list of the NI DAQ models that support this type of synchronization:

http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/370466V-01/mxdevconsid/synchronmxsc/

http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/370466V-01/mxdevconsid/SYNCHRONE/

Please note that, as stated here: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370466V-01/mxcncpts/syncsampleclock/ this form of synchronization can cause the jitter when used with multiplexes hardware DAQ.

Thank you and best regards,

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • VMotion with peripheral issues GROSS (GA)

    Dears

    VMotion with RAW Devices (GA), is it Possible or not?

    I tried to share the doormen and tested the server but did not the vmotion

    will I change the configuration of raw devices on vmware or what?

    I presented to all ESxi clustered and chose the default values when adding to this VM need access to devices of this

    Please notify

    Normal VMotion with RDM, whether virtual or physical compatibility mode is possible and fully supported. Storage vMotion is supported too but real data RDM physical mode can be moved in the process.

    See:

    http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1005241 Migration of virtual machines with Raw Device mapping (RDM)

  • NOR-DAQ traditional (old) devices of measurement and automation explore 4.7 with LabView2010 under Windows 7.

    In measurement and Automation Explorer 4.7, with LabView2010 in Windows 7, peripheral OR-DAQ traditional (old) appears under devices and Interfaces and it allows me to create a chassis SCXI-1000, and she agrees "Reset for NOR-traditional DAQ.  However, it does not search the modules in the SCXI1000, and when I ask 'trial', he says 'Impossible to test the chassis at this time.'  The entrance of NOR-DAQmx devices for the SCXI-1000 chassis has no problem and detects the modules very well.  I need the Legacy DAQ to a popular former teaching tool that has no equivalent in NOR-DAQmx.

    Unfortunately, NEITHER-DQA traditional (old) for Windows Vista and 7 functions of the only driver on Windows 7 32-bit, as seen on the page of the driver at the end of paragraph 1 Solution. I recommend you move your program to DAQmx.

  • Incorrect, test the results of the e/s digital PCI-6024E in MAX

    Hi all

    I have a problem with PCI-6024E. It is for the Commission alone OR installed on a target computer. First he just used OR-traditional DAQ (7.1, if I'm not mistaken) and it worked fine. Some time ago I installed NOR-DAQmx 8.7.1 on the same computer because it is necessary to run both programs written with NOR-DAQmx and NOR-traditional DAQ. As I know there is no harm to do both OR-DAQ and NOR-DAQmx on the same computer if they are not used at the same time. You can see the traditional under NOR-DAQmx devices and peripheral branches DAQ PCI-6024E jury in MAX. When I run the self-test, self-calibration or Reset Device, Max there is no problem. But Test panels (under the direction of NOR-DAQmx) has a rather strange behavior. When I press the "Start" button in tab e/s digital Test panels window with all the digital lines in input, the 4 first green indicators are on and the other 4 are not. And then nothing happens or I press the 'Stop' button or not. I have the same card as a virtual in my MAX on a development computer, and there is a different behavior of it (I don't have traditional DAQ here, just the same version DAQmx). During the entire procedure of test until I press the button 'Stop', the port State 8 lines constantly evolves so the Green indicators are switched on and off with different ways through all possible combinations of logic '1' and '0' in each line of the port.

    The problem is really obvious when trying to control the statements of some laboratory equipment using their passage through PCI-6024E. digital controls. In this case I get auto turn on/off devices connected to the first 4 lines (which are always lit for some reason any as stated that the Green indicators).

    What should I do? This means the Agency is malfunctioning or there is some conflict of data acquisition and acquisition of data-mx? I would try reinstalling DAQ - mx, but I don't think it's a way out of the situation. I work under Windows XP SP2.

    I appreciate all help.

    Igor-

    Your digital outputs will remain in their last State configured unless the device is reset, in which case they will go to the default value (high, in this case).  So if the last State of the low output of your digital program, as long as you do not call the Device.vi DAQmx reset or shut down the computer, they will remain weak.

    If you have other questions about this application in LabVIEW, it would be better to create a new post on the forum so that we can keep these two separate issues (States of I/O digital by default against digital programming in LabVIEW).  If you are looking for a starting point, you can open the Finder example in LabVIEW ('Help' to find examples).  "" Once the example Finder opens, click on input and output material"DAQmx ' digital generation ' write Dig Chan.vi.  This will help you start.

    Better luck with your request and have a great day!

  • Merging of files in El Capitan

    I moved some folders in the side window for convenience. One of them was the applications folder. It has now disappeared from my side window, and I want to. When I use a projector, I see that there are three application folders, which is for the folder iTunes only and a fourth, which is also iTunes.

    I want to merge the three folders and place a copy in the window on my side. How do I do that? In the past, whenever I wanted to put something in the window, I dragged just there, but I don't want three files of applications here, I just want a. So, I guess it boils down to merge the files of three application and then dragging the new folder to the window side. How do I do that?

    I found this: single folder of applications. It is in one of the peripheral issues. In any case, after finding it, I dragged the it to the window, where it now remains. Detective Conan.

  • iPad pro problem showing images video and Youtube eBay

    Hi all

    I have a strange problem with my iPad pro (and before that with the iPad 1 air).

    Installation program:

    • Telekom VDSL 50, Telekom Speedport W724V
    • 2 WLAN Range Extenders (1 Telekom, 1 Devolo)
    • iPad Pro and before the Air1 iPad with problem
    • iPhone 6 s more, iPad 2 Air without problem
    • peripheral and peripheral issues no problem have the same WLAN settings
    • everything on the same level of iOS
    • no problem with cell phone, Wifi only!

    Affected applications:

    YouTube and eBay Apps

    problem also occurs when you access related Web sites via iOS Safari, but less frequent

    Problem:

    Applications have problems to load media files (pictures and videos). After a while, network errors occur und sites can no longer be reached.

    Seems it to come in different severities: sometimes I solve the problem by turning WLAN off and back on. Sometimes to renew the lease from network works. Sometimes, I need to turn the iPad and turn it back on. Any action is temporary, the problem reoccur, and more I use the sites, the shorter the time before the problem came back again.

    Does anyone have the same problem? Any ideas or solutions?

    Thank you very much

    I have a similar problem, but only when I am connected to my Wifi extender (via the Powerline) devolo. As soon as I connect to my router directly, the problem disappeared.

    In my view, the problem is caused because recent versions of IoS are more compatible with the Devolo WiFi extender.

    No idea how to fix?

  • SM Bus controller and 2 missing USB controller drivers

    Hello and thanks for reading, I recently reformatted my laptop HP Pavilion dv7-6113 cl with windows 7, which is it came with, I just a new set.

    But after getting all the software I wanted and pilots back on this subject that I noticed that two of my USB ports are not working, and two others say they don't 3.0 which I may be wrong, but I'm sure they are.  I've looked everywhere, people say USB drivers are delivered with Chipset AMD drivers, any other with the same problem but different HP laptop has posted on this forum and others that drivers AMD fixed his problem, but he has not worked for me, here the source:

    "For some reason, HP does not only provide the driver of portable computers for all its AMD based AMD chipset on any page of support and driver."

     

    You must install the amd chipset driver from the link below, the first file listed. Who will install the drivers for SM Bus and USB 3.0.

     

    http://support.AMD.com/us/gpudownload/Windows/pages/raid_windows.aspx#2 ".

    However when I click the link need me somewhere else where AMD wants me to fill my specs pc or automatic detection. that gives me drivers, but does not solve my problem of USB.  He also says: "your system does not support these drivers.

    That's what my said Dev Manager has no drivers.

    SM Bus controller

    (USB) Universal Serial Bus controller

    (USB) Universal Serial Bus controller

    In "Information systems" in the topic "Peripheral issue" here is what is stated.

    SM Bus controller

    PCI\VEN_1022 & DEV_780B & SUBSYS_3591103C & REV_13\3 & 2411E6FE & 2 & A0

    The drivers for this device are not installed.

    Universal Serial Bus (USB) ControllerPCI\VEN_1022 & DEV_7812 & SUBSYS_3591103C & REV_03\3 & 2411E6FE & 2 & 80

    The drivers for this device are not installed.

    (USB) Universal Serial Bus controller

    PCI\VEN_1022 & DEV_7812 & SUBSYS_3591103C & REV_03\3 & 2411E6FE & 2 & 81

    The drivers for this device are not installed.

    Here is my system info

    Name of the operating system Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium

    Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601

    Another Description of the OS is not available

    Manufacturer of operating system Microsoft Corporation

    System name ANONYMOUS-PC

    System manufacturer Hewlett-Packard

    System model HP Pavilion dv7 Notebook PC

    System Type x 64-based PC

    Processor AMD A6 - 3400M APU with 4 logical processors, 4 Lossnay, 1400 Mhz, graphics HD Radeon (TM)

    Hewlett-Packard Version / Date BIOS F.21, 13/09/2011

    SMBIOS Version 2.7

    Windows directory C:\Windows

    System directory C:\Windows\system32

    Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1

    The local United States

    Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "6.1.7601.17514".

    Physical memory (RAM) installed 8.00 GB

    7,48 GB total physical memory

    5.34 GB available physical memory

    15.0 GB total virtual memory

    12.4 GB available virtual memory

    Page file space 7.48 GB

    Paging file C:\pagefile.sys

    HP Pavilion dv7 - 6113cl Entertainment Notebook PC
    Serial number: 5CH1350U9U
    Product number: QE360UA

    All suggestions greatly appreciated.

    Thank you

    The specifications of your HP Pavilion laptop dv7-6113 cl Entertainment, clearly indicate that this model has 2 x USB 3.0 SuperSpeed in most 2 ports-port Universal Serial Bus (USB) 2.0. Please try the AMD Chipset Drivers (Chipset, USB 3.0, SATA/RAID). or looking for HP SP61462.exe

    If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

    Please click the 'Thumbs Up' white LAURELS to show your appreciation

  • Canon, in the face of fast moving subjects 18-55 kit lens?

    Hi everyone, I'm new here.

    I was doing one shoot the other day on very fast subjects that changed a lot of direction (dogs). Got some good shots but the vast majority were evil out of the home, which was a real shame. I want to know if it's the lens, the body or my technique that does not reach me.

    I'm relatively new to photography, so maybe it's that my settings are wrong or my technique is bad. I'm using the lens wide open, not mode live view with servo AF on a 600 d body. Usually when I focus I pan just the camera turn to follow the subject, sometimes pressing down when I want to shoot.

    I plan the upgrade to the 17-55 f2.8 because it is sharp wide open and has a constant and fast opening and USM and full-time manual focus with a correct focus ring.

    Thank you.

    Your problems are probably due to a combination of factors. IMO, auto focus performance is determined by three things...

    1. camera AF capabilities. Your 600 d has 9 AF points system. Only one of these points - the center one - is the "best" type of cross that is more responsive and follows the movement better. When shooting moving subjects with your camera, it would be useful to limit yourself to using only the central point. (Note: other Canon cameras have more advanced systems of the AF.) T4i, T5i, 60 d, 50 d and 40 d has 9 AF points that looks like, but all nine points are the cross-type sesnors 'better '. The 7 d and 70 d AF 19 points, with all of the nineteen cut type. 5DIII and 1DX 61 points AF with up to 41 Cup type, depending on the lens used.)

    Some cameras are also optimized for performance development. For example, the models of the series 1 d and 7 d have a separate chip driving AF... While most (maybe all?) other models share the tasks of AF by the same processor that handles images.

    2 capacity autofocus lens: Yes, a reader of "USM" (Ultrasonic Motor) objective as the EF-S 17 - 55 / 2.8 would be an improvement on your kit lens. It is faster, less hunting and is quieter than a 'micro' such as is used in the cheaper kit lens. (Note: there is a version a bit more of the 18-55mm with drive focus "STM" or "Stepper motor", which is better than the micro motor version, but still not as fast as USM.) STM lenses are running silent and particularly well suited for video.)

    A larger aperture, like the 17-55 / 2.8 (as opposed to your 18-55/3.5-5.6), offers more light to the camera AF sensors, allowing for faster and better follow-up.

    No, forget all the EF 50/1.8... Of course, he got more openness, but it uses a micro motor and is widely known to be developed slower, less accurate and likely to hunt more than a USM lens. If you want a quick and of course focusing in short and medium telephoto, look to the EF 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100/2 or L-135/2 lenses. These all use USM drive and are much faster and more accurate than the EF 50/1.8. They have also one or two larger max aperture stop that even the 17-55 / 2.8 (or any other zoom lens), provide more light for the camera to work with. Using a f2.8 lens or "faster" will give optimal performance on your camera, with the centre of focus.

    A few drinks simply are not designed to be developed fast, even if they have more large openings and USM focus. Macro lenses, for example, have to move their focus group a long, long way to go from infinity to 1:1 magnification tends to be slower. In addition, very large aperture lenses such as the 85 / 1.2 L are generally slower... Design. Very large aperture lenses and macro focus on precision, to deal with the shallow depth of the effects on the ground, rather than speed.

    Other objectives are designed to the very fast development. All 70-200, the 100-400 and all the first 300mm lenses and more, are quite fast focusing. Extreme telephotos such as 500 and 600 mm can be difficult to get and keep on target, however.

    Some third-party lenses also make use of similar to Canon's USM development drive, to help the performance of the update. Sigma HSM and Tamron lenses USD are examples.

    3. skills of the user is the third key factor making the update performance... that is, your technique.

    You mention servos 'AF '...  Just to clarify, yourcamera has three focus modes: one-shot, HAVE Focus and AI Servo... There is no "Servo AF. The correct mode to use with moving subjects is AI Servo. Perhaps what you are already doing. In any case, One Shot is almost only used with stationary subjects (there are techniques of 'pre-focus' where it can be used with moving subjects, but those who are rarely used). I Focus is not really a foucs mode at all... It is supposed to decide for you, if the subject is moving, then change to use the correct mode. I have not tested on a recent, but older model where I tried, I found a slight delay that causes a lot of discussion missed shots. He also simply chose the wrong mode sometimes. It might be interesting to note that Canon more pro-oriented models have same AI Focus... they offer only One Shot or AI Servo.

    So, make sure that you are using AI Servo to maximize performance when shooting moving subjects.

    You also use a slow shutter speed. I inflate the ISO and try to use 1/500 or faster shutter speeds. 1/320 or 1/400 is very marginal, trying to stop the movement of the subject with something as fast as the dogs in action. In fact, more you are close to the subject, shutter speed more fast you will really need to freeze movement.

    Cannon also noted that the 18MP models are a little prone to blur shake camera - probably because of the high density of pixels on the sensor sites - and recommends keeping shutter speeds upwards to be sure to get a sharp shot, even with IS lenses. There was a white paper on this subject, on the Canon website. I don't know if it is still available online.

    You should be able to get nice images, specific to ISO 1600... a complete stop of two higher and you to use much faster shutter speed. However, if the indoor shooting it may be areas that are not as well informed and are hard to get a sharp shot.

    You can shoot RAW files, so that you can more fully control noise reduction and factors in post-processing exposure when using high ISO.

    A popular technique among photographers of sports/action is back button to the point. See this article online, on this subject: http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2011/backbutton_af_article.shtml

    BBF separates the function of the development of the trigger. You use rather your thumb on one of the rear camera buttons to start and stop the development. Many users feel that this allows more safe and followed acquistion with moving subjects. You can configure your camera for BBF and give it a try. It is possible for action/sport/HAVE Servo shooting, it's actually usable once, too... I used it enough only for a few years now.

    With the help of BBF, I start AF well before that I want to take the picture, then focus on the maintenance of the area to focus on the right of the subject where I want the lens to focus continuing to follow and maintain the emphasis... then take pictures along the way. I use the Center Focus point alone, much of the time. This could lead to too centered images, so I try to fit a little loose from time to time, allowing cropping to make that fewer centered images. I sometimes use other than the Center AF point... but who wouldn't recommend with action shot on a camera that does not have the type sensors crossed to peripheral issues, such as your 600 d.

    I use a pair of 7Ds and a number of USM lenses fast development of shoot a lot of sports. With a few years of practice under my belt, on avearage I nail focus on 95 to 98 on 100 shots using this type of gear with the above techniques. I turned to 4000 images at an event recent and marked about 30 people like "rejected" to missed focus problems (and I bet at least half of those who are my fault... not the machine). There may be a few others that are marginally acceptable (i.e., can make an 8 x 10 beautiful print, but seem not good any more greater than). Yet, even if there are 80 or 120 spleen focus, it is only 2 or 3%... much better than only 10% in short.

    I would say that qualities of objective performance and user techniques generally count more than the camera well, or at least can largely compensate for any camera shortcomings. I got results almost as good 50 d and 30 d before it (which were similar to your 600 d AF system) and even with 10 days earlier ("lower" than your AF system). Although I'm a bit away, I didn't like good luck shooting moving subjects using 5 d Mark II (I mostly just use it for stationary subjects)... the 5 d Mark III has a much better AF system and follows the movement much better.

    I hope this helps!

    ***********
    Alan Myers

    San Jose, California, USA.
    «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
    MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

  • HDMI to DVI will work on hp2207?

    Hello.

    Just got a new MacBook Pro retina 15 "from Apple. They could not would not fix my old computer so I had to take another to place it. Good luck me, Yes, but I have a lot of peripheral issues. I have successfully used a DVI adapter to Thunderbolt to run my HP2207, but it is a little buggy. Could be the sleep or powersave parameters. Did not understand how to get this to work with clamshell mode consistenly.

    Question: can I use an hdmi to DVI to connect my Macbook pro (hdmi) to HP2207 (DVI)?

    Thank you.

    Hi skipsax,

    I understand that you want to connect your MacBook Pro to your HP 2207 monitor with a DVI HDMI connection. I did some research on this and found this information.

    In this paper a monitor driver update is a section for instructors using HP on a Mac.

    I also found this information at high SPEED for "can I connect HDMI/DVI.

    I hope this information can help, please let me know.

    Thank you

  • Problems of network and Vista SP2

    I read a lot of discussion and of internet articles explaining the problems with Vista SP2 update. I have 3 PC / laptop on my home network. A PC with Vista SP2 (cable), a Sony notebook (wireless) with Vista SP1 and a portable IBM (wired) with XP Pro SP3.

    The SP2 from Vista PC has several symptoms, all pointing to a single cause. I've updated to IE8 at the same time, but also have a problem with Firefox. Subsequently, but with repeated reboot iTunes downloads. Copies of files network NAS also experience time-out issues. Even ping the IP of the gateway translates to periodic messages out "request timed." This highlights a problem with the network or the IP stack drivers.

    I checked that I use the last available network driver. I also disabled IPv6. No change.
    Occaisionaly than other experiences of the peripheral issues (laptop computer IBM and Sony), but these were resolved only after the Netgear gateway is restarted.

    The network has operated in this configuration for several months without errors. The Netgear gateway running the latest firmware. No suggestions have led or has proposed a solution.

    You go to the site of the manufacturer of the device and look for the latest driver? As Realtek, IDT, or that which
    Do such unit as listed in the manufacturer of the device. Often the real device manufacturer will have newer drivers
    the system and certainly most recent manufacturer this update of drivers of in Device Manager.
    (MS is far behind the drivers of certification).

    Manually, look at the sites of the manufacturer for drivers: this for the real device manufacturer
    http://pcsupport.about.com/od/driverssupport/HT/driverdlmfgr.htm

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Connect as long as Admin - Start - COMMAND - find on the list above.
    RIGHT CLICK - RUN AS ADMINISTRATOR

    type or copy and paste to the command prompt and press on enter after each

    ipconfig/flushdns

    nbtstat-r

    nbtstat - RR

    netsh int Reinitialis

    netsh int ip reset

    netsh winsock reset

    Reset

    That refreshes your IP stack

    Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

  • CS4: Setting Up separate audio/video Capture Sources

    Im still very new to PrProCS4 and I was wondering what I can met if I want to use audio/video separated the peripheral issues of capture to record directly in first. I have a Canon ZR40 cheapo camera, but instead of using his microphone embedded terrible I want to use my recording equipment with my Tascam US-144 and a microphone powered ghost as my audio device. Are there problems that im going to meet with the sync between the two, and is still possible in the first to lead the record?

    First won't be able to record live together at the same time.  It can handle only a single source FireWire at the same time.

    If you record separate sounds, the only problem you will encounter is the synchronization of clips.  Essentially, you will have to do it for every single clip in the sequence.  There is no process of simple automatic synchronization for a whole lot of clips.

    Your best bet would be to connect the external microphone on the camera and recording the sound on the tape.  This way, you will get the best audio and synchronized clips.

  • frequency DAQ USB issue (6211)

    Hello

    I'm a newbie when it comes to NOR and data acquisition. I bought a NI USB 6211 and connected a resolver with 400 Hz and ai1, ai2 (CSR) (sine and cosine signals). I also have the reference of the power supply connected to ai3 (differential) of signals. Pockets of tension give a +/-2.5 Volts from all sources input signal.

    The problem is that the signal moves to the right. She moves uniformly for all signals.

    Now, I wonder is it possible to synchronize the input signal so that it moves? or what I need to resolve this issue programmatically? I'm programming in C with standard DAQmx drivers (v15.1). But I saw the same problem with Labview and Measurement Studio.

    Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

    Kind regards

    Gerhard

    I guess I just find the answer to my question here:

    http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabVIEW/DAQ-Assistant-can-t-lock-the-signals/m-p/1332484#M542285

    I guess I have to ask in the forum section of C++ for an example of a software lock.

    Kind regards

    Gerhard

  • Issues of analog input DAQ-6008, voltage not zero to pin when you are offline

    I use the 6008 NOR-DAQ to produce a series of tensions and then read a sense resistor using the analog input (CSR). I noticed that my analog input gives me 1.3 V, when I probe it (compared to the mass of the device), when it is completely disconnected. This changes the reading to give me a different measure of sense than expected resistance.

    Why is my pin for analog input non-zero? Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!

    The 1.3 V is expected. The USB-6008-and-6009 case have the strangest input of the world circuit. The input impedance is approximately 144000 ohms terminated in 1.4 V. check the document User Guide and specifications.

    Lynn

  • 6008 NI DAQ issues of reading pressure transducer

    Hello everyone, I am a new user of labeled and not one expert on electronics, so please bear with me.

    I'm trying to read a signal 4-20 my by a pressure transducer using a NI DAQ 6008 and Labview version 8.6. I am running Windows XP Professional. I'm the transducer, (http://www.omega.com/Pressure/pdf/PX01-I.pdf) providing a voltage of 10 v I have a 235 external resistance ohms between the terminals positive and negative data acquisition (although I am not sure that it is correct). At the start of my VI, I am able to measure a voltage of environ.9 data acquisition (verified by a voltmeter/ammeter) V and a current of environ.39 my.

    My problem is the fact that when I have a supply pressure of my sensor, I have not received any signal whatsoever by the transducer, despite the fact that it is important that the pressure should give me a signal. Is this a problem with my installation, connections, data acquisition (which has been reset in MAX number of times and pass the self-test) or the sensor itself?

    Thank you for your time and consideration

    Hi prenerk,

    You are right that resistance must be connected to the terminals positive and negative a way to HAVE to create a measured voltage to current.  Here are two troubleshooting steps you can try:

    1. check with an ammeter so you are detecting a change in the current when you apply pressure to the transducer.

    2. open the Explorer Measurement & Automation and use a Test Panel to measure the voltage of the device.  This will ensure that there is a mistake in your LabVIEW code.  Also check the MAX pinout diagram to see if your sons are correctly plugged into the channel of GOT it.

    If you have not discovered a problem with the above steps, we will have to learn more about your sensor pressure and how you connect it to the 6008.  We will need the information on the sons of the Omega instrument and how they are connected to the excitation voltage source and 6008.  Let us know how it goes!

    Brian

  • DAQ self-test passed - peripheral does not.

    Hi, I have problems with a configuration PCI-6115/BNC-2110. The PCI card passes the self-test. And the NLC has all static tensions (for example, the constant 5V terminal is to turn off 5V and the power light is on).

    Yet, I can't control any of my devices via the analog output.

    How reliable is the test? Could there be a problem with the card that allow me to change the voltages at the terminals, but always to provide constant power to the box? And also be able to pass the test?

    I tried this set upward on both computers. The number of the device is in the Device Manager and moving and Automation Explorer. But I can't control my devices yet. I was hesitant to consider hardware problems given that the PCI card has passed the test and the BNC box is powered. But I don't see anything else that I can edit on the computer to make the camera provide the correct tension.

    If we measure the output of terminals, there is a very small change in voltage (0, 05 - 0.10V), but not the 5V that we need.

    Does anyone have any suggestions?

    -Matt

    A neighbor of mine did a PCI-6229 he left me borrrow. This completely solves the problem. Apparently, good results in the self test and the power of the box of the BNC is not a mark of DAQ devices work properly.

    Thanks for the help!

Maybe you are looking for