Pole #1 PC Performance and RAM: quantity, average, maximum size of files Adobe

Similar Questions

• I bought photo 10 in stock by months and whenever I try to download the file, Adobe asking me to pay for the file. How can I fix it?

  How can I change this option, so I'm not paying for something I already pay for?

  Just to be safe, you re connected to the website of Stock and you see the name and 10 images remaining in place and place 42 and my name in this screenshot in the upper right of the Stock site?

  

• Script to resize and rename images in several sizes of files in Photoshop CC

  I have THOUSANDS of images that I have to do this:

  Resize to 500 x 500 and rename it to FILENAME_MD.jpg

  Resize to 374 x 498 and rename to FILENAME_SM.jpg

  276 x 385 resize and rename to FILENAME_XS.jpg

  My approach:

  I have to separate the Portrait vs landscape sizes size so when I resize 374 x 498 and 276 x 385 images don't get cuts

  I tried just to cut the original 2000 x 2000, and then creating droplets, but for some reason that some of them kept cutting, so I'm now just to the eye the and their separation. (Please tell me that there is a better way!)

  Here is what my records/droplets are like:

  There must be a better way to do this! Please someone help! I have 50 000 images to do that to!

  

  You must install xtools. Just install version v3.2b3 here: ps-scripts-browse/Image Processor Pro / Beta v3_2 on SourceForge.net. You can either install it manually or as an extension.

  BTW, if you really want to install xtools, you need to run PS with administrator privileges.

• What do you use for deploying Windows 7 64-bit Ent regarding vCPU and RAM in your environment?

  Hi guys,.

  In my environment, we are currently running Windows 7 Ent 64-bit with 2 x vCPU and 2.5 GB of RAM.

  Everything is working fine, but recently I just got a free health check of Xangati and would like to know if there is something I could do to improve the environment.

  Essentially according to the results of the audit, I learned that I could be more indicer CPU and RAM on my desk from view.

  My host is running 16 x 2.599 GHz CPU, and according to the report once I hit the hard desk with activities (CPU maxed out at 100% for about 15 minutes), it is said that the "CPU usage" hypervisor uses only 1.9 GHz top.

  This means that a 1 x vCPU is more than enough to handle our daily tasks, so I went down there to 1 vCPU and test it hard once again by Windows Update.

  Even if the use of the "processor" said again that I didn't not max at 2.599 but use the Windows processor is maxed out.

  For me, it's like doing an update of windows on 1 vCPU is slower than when I used 2 vCPU but according to numbers, it shouldn't.

  It was the same exact situation with the RAM.

  If I look in the Windows Task Manager, Windows RAM was maxed out almost when I was doing tests, but on the side of the hypervisor, it says I'm only averaging about 1.7 GB.

  So now I'm not sure what matrix that I should go. The windows or on the side hyper-visiere? Haha.

  If I followed the hyper-visiere, I get scared when their desktop view is slow, the user could come to me and ask for additional resources, because that's what they see in the Task Manager.

  It will be hard to convince them not to worry about what the Task Manager shows.

  Note: I have no problem with the data since all desktop computers store is located in the FusionIO card.

  Anyway, just want to see it as the Deputy there to use when they have configured their Windows 7 operating system.

  Are you visiting x 2 vCPU and 2 or 3 GB of RAM? Or you would follow instead indicating you the numbers of the hypervisor?

  What would you do?

  Thank you guys!

  I feel that it is something that must be determined on a case by case.    We started with 1 vCPU which works great for 95% of our users.    We have others that require more resources while they were transferred in a different pool with additional resources.    In addition, we found that 1 vCPU works well for most everything except the video.   If you want to play a lot of video you can test with 2 vCPU and see if that works better.

  In the end, it's all about what your user comments and should dictate.   You don't want to shake your users of the resources, because that will lead to the decline in performance and the bad perception but also be careful not to approve because they will lead to poor performance and a bad perception.    Once people get a negative perception of the environment, it is difficult to cross.

• Updated satellite A20-S103 - CPU and RAM

  I have toshiba satellite a20-s103 and I want to spend the cpu and ram.

  I need more to upgrade the processor that the RAM, the socket is socket p, please if you find any compatible cpu or ram from e - bay or if you find elsewhere, new cpu, or second hand in a good situation, please report it!

  and please tell me if intel core 2 duo or quad is compatible
  If you find the intel core 2 quad or compatible with that laptop duo, please report!

  Thank you very much!!!

  Guess what buddy.
  Forget the CPU upgrade!

  It is a very old notebook support old chipset.
  I'm quite sure that the chipset would not support Intel Core CPU m.

  In addition, the memory can be improved up to 1 GB of RAM (2 x 512 MB)
  More is not possible.

  In my opinion, if you need more performance, buy a laptop (maybe good work 2nd unit) supporting the newer parts.

• Daily series VS Performance and entertainment?

  HP has desktop computers in the "Everyday Computing" and "Performance and Enterment" series.

  I adapted a desktop computer in both series.  For the series of performance and Entertainment Office, you get more choice of components.

  However, the components that I need are available for both series.

  In addition, desktop computers has the same motherboard.

  If desktop computers have been adapted with the same components, wouldn't they have the same performance?

  I understand what you ask because I did the same thing and had the same questions.  The answer is Yes.

  But there are other differences between the two lines, in addition to the customizable options of cpu, ram, disk hard size and chip/card graphic.  Click the tab of the sheet and you'll see different chassis sizes, sizes of power, a different number of slots, etc.

  The series 'Performance and play' has a more robust architecture and is easier to add updates in the future, as the media platforms continue to evolve.  Also gives you a little more space inside to work with.

  I hope this helps.

• P7 - 1010t cto Pavilion: upgrade of processor and RAM memory

  I wonder if the upgrade to a faster processor and the RAM imcreassed will provide significant performance and practice

  Yes, but you must consider a few things first.

  RAM, if you currently have one slot of occupied RAM then add more RAM to fill all the slots does two things for you, it increase the bandwidth to access RAM and what is obvious, give you more memeory for your applications and reduce disk swapping.  Increase the bandwidth for RAM access ceratinly will provide a performance gain just by itself.

  Upgrade the processor is debatable and depends largely on what you use your PC for.  If you simply run email and web browsing then probably an upgrade is useless, but if you run several CPU intensive tasks then a processor upgrade help. Processor intel celeron and pentium are core, i3 range are dual core and the i5 and i7 are four hearts.  Simply the best kernels if you run intensive taks and i5 and i7 processors support the turbo boost, which means carrots redundant can kick in to increase the speed of these processors according to demand.  Hyper-threading (with several processes running in parallel) is also supported by the i7 (maybe some processors i5 as well).

• Profile of Performance and memory

  Hi, guys

  Trying to analysis the data of my profile to the profile of Performance and memory.

  When I check the data for VI times, I found there are same screws with different time of VI, whatever that means

  Why I cela it is because I will add model pulse for my VI, so I need to know the relationship between my all instruments and time, I'm on the right track

  Thank you

  It seems that the calendar had a resolution of 15.6 ms, which I think is common on some flavors of the Windows operating system.  Note that the average time on some of these screws is equal to zero.  This suggessts that time for many tracks 1878, was probably recorded as zero and some were 15.6 ms.

  It's one of the limitations of the Profiler.

  Lynn

• How can I upgrade my PROCESSOR and RAM

  Hello, I use a HP Compaq Presario CQ43. There with APU AMD E-450 with Radeon HD graphics card and 2.0 GB of RAM. My question is can I upgrade my processor and RAM 4 GB because I want to play games. If Ican please tell me how? Please help me.

  Your Service Manual:

  Manual

  You already have the best processor that can fit on your motherboard which is an AMD version. Theoretically, you can go with a card mother Intel and processor, but that would cost a lot of money (more than a new laptop) and give only slightly better graphics. not yet for the games. To be explicit, the graphics 'card' are not a card, but a single chip directly soldered on the motherboard and cannot be removed, replaced, improved or anything of the sort.

  The slightly good news is that you can install up to 8 GB of memory... is the DDR3-1333 SO-DIMM. That will boost the overall performance, but still not make a game by a long shot machine.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• p6717me-m: map graphic and RAM upgrade compatibility

  Hello

  I have a HP p6717me-m, running a Nvidia GEforce405 and 4 GB of RAM by default. Im a gamer and mainly using the pc to play games like Counter strike: global offensive. But I am only able to run the game in low details ultra and still get only 30 fps if I'm lucky. That is why the I'm looking to upgrade to the pc to get more fps. I would like to know which components of the pc should I be upgrading for better fps. Ive been told that it is the graphics card and RAM that should be upgraded by friends. If, therefore, what is the best graphic card and RAM interchangeable compatible with this model? Pls help... Thank you.

  djbboii wrote:

  Hello

  I have a HP p6717me-m, running a Nvidia GEforce405 and 4 GB of RAM by default. Im a gamer and mainly using the pc to play games like Counter strike: global offensive. But I am only able to run the game in low details ultra and still get only 30 fps if I'm lucky. That is why the I'm looking to upgrade to the pc to get more fps. I would like to know which components of the pc should I be upgrading for better fps. Ive been told that it is the graphics card and RAM that should be upgraded by friends. If, therefore, what is the best graphic card and RAM interchangeable compatible with this model? Pls help... Thank you.

  Here's the product specifications for the HP Pavilion p6717me desktop PC.  Based on the specifications, there are 3 things that you could upgrade to improve the performance of your game (and global).  I have them listed in the recommended order.

  1 update RAM: your unit comes with 4 GB of RAM, you should move it to 8, 12 or 16 total (16 GB MAX).

  2 GPU (video card) update: I highly recommend the upgrade of your GPU.  You can get any PCI Express x 16 card which physically fits in the slot.  The only limitation here is your power supply (PSU) offering only 300W of power.  Most of the best graphics cards require a minimum of 450-500W of power.   The power supply is a standard ATX power supply, so you should be able to upgrade easily if you want to upgrade the video card.

  3 update CPU: your device comes with an Intel i5 CPU and it could be upgraded to an i7 processor.  Models and information are listed in the connection of the plug above.

• Build self... Advanced performance and information system not showing the correct information?

  IV done a self build, and would like to know if this is a common thing or something I did in what regards why "information on the performance and tools" are not to enter the 'manufacturer, model. If I click Start and right click computer-> properties, then click on tools and information on the performance on the bottom left of the screen, and then click view and print detailed performance information and system
  What I get is,

  System

  System manufacturer (im asuming that I would see something like ASUSTeK Computer Inc.)

  Model product name system (im asuming that I would see something like M5A78L-M)

  In addition, the number of processors is showing 2... maybe this is a noob question, but I thought that 'quad' amounted to four?

  The MB is an Asus M5A78L - M USB3
  The AMD Bulldozer FX - 4170 Quad Core 4.20 GHz CPU
  16 GB of RAM
  Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6670

  I would add a scrrenshot, but I don't know how to upload it here, so hopfuly it's info is sufficient here to go. If not, please let me know what are the other necessary specifications

  Thank you

  If you really want your info system (manufacturer, model, OEM Logo, etc) there's this program that does this. It's a low)<500Kb) executable that you="" can="" download.="" it's="" called="" oem="" configurator="" 2.0.="" it="" lets="" you="" change="" the manufacturer,="" model,="" support="" hours,="" support="" phone,="" support="" website,="" oem="" logo,="" as="" well="" as="" the="" owner, organization,="" computer="" name,="" processor="" name,="" computer="" description,="" and="" the="" product="">

  You can download it here (Direct download link): OEM Configurator 2.0

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• SQL Server 2008 R2 CPU and RAM requirement for HFM/FDM

  Summary of the problem

  ---------------------------------------------------

  Requirement of SQL Server 2008 R2 for HFM/FDM

  Description of the problem

  ---------------------------------------------------

  We install a new EPM 11.1.2.3 - HFM and FDM on one server that hosts the services of the Foundation and FR. Our question is on the CPU and Ram needed on the SQL Server. We have 2 users with 4 GB of data, but we have to get the good performance of SQL server.

  Please provide me with a white paper link or just tell me what it takes.

  Thanks in advance.

  4 CPUS and 16 GB of RAM should be more than enough to support your needs

• PowerCLI Script required to identify all clusters in a data center and all hosts within each cluster and calculate it using cpu and ram, avg, min, and max.

  Hi all

  I'm new to powercli and try to create a script to list all clusters in a data center and all hosts in a cluster and calculate min, max and avg cpu usage and ram by the host and cluster. So far, I have tried the below but I can't publish the results of my script.

  $Function = @)
  ForEach ($DataCenter Get-Data Center)
  {
  ForEach ($cluster in ($DataCenter |)) Get - Cluster)) - need help to post the information here and confirm if this is correct or not.
  {
  ForEach ($hosts in ($cluster |)) Get - VMHost))
  {
  ForEach ($vms to ($hosts |)) Get - VM)) - do not know if I called you here functions properly
  {
  $allvms = @)
  $allhosts = @)
  $hosts = get-VMHost
  $vms = get - Vm

  {foreach ($vms in $hosts)
  $hoststat = "" | Select the host name, MemMax, MemAvg, MemMin, CPUMax, CPUAvg, CPUMin
  $hoststat. Host name = $vmHost.name
  
  $statcpu = get-Stat-entity ($vmHost) - start (get-date). AddDays(-30)-Finish (Get-Date) - MaxSamples 10000 - stat cpu.usage.average
  $statmem = get-Stat-entity ($vmHost) - start (get-date). AddDays(-30)-Finish (Get-Date) - MaxSamples 10000 - stat mem.usage.average

  $cpu = $statcpu | Measure-object-property value - average - Maximum - Minimum
  $mem = $statmem | Measure-object-property value - average - Maximum - Minimum
  
  $hoststat. CPUMax = $cpu. Maximum
  $hoststat. CPUAvg = $cpu. Average
  $hoststat. CPUMin = $cpu. Minimum
  $hoststat. MemMax = $mem. Maximum
  $hoststat. MemAvg = $mem. Average
  $hoststat. MemMin = $mem. Minimum
  $allhosts += $hoststat
  }
  }
  }
  }
  }

  $Function | Select the host name, MemMax, MemAvg, MemMin, CPUMax, CPUAvg, CPUMin | Export-Csv "c:\Function.csv" - noTypeInformation

  Any help on this is much appreciated.

  [Ordered] casting was introduced in v3 PowerShell.

  For PowerShell v2, you can use

  $vms = get - VM

  $stat = 'cpu.usage.average ','mem.usage.average '.

  $start = (get-Date). AddDays(-31)

  $report = get-Stat-entity $vms - start $start - Stat $stat - ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |

  Group-object - property {$_.} @entity.name} | %{

  $cpu = $_. Group | where {$_.} MetricId - eq "cpu.usage.average"} | Measure-object-property value - average - Maximum - Minimum

  $mem = $_. Group | where {$_.} MetricId - eq "mem.usage.average"} | Measure-object-property value - average - Maximum - Minimum

  New-object PSObject-property @ {}

  Datacenter = Get-Datacenter - VM $_. Group [0]. Entity | Select the name of ExpandProperty-

  Cluster Cluster Get - VM = $_. Group [0]. Entity | Select the name of ExpandProperty-

  VMHost = $_. Group [0]. Entity.Host.Name

  Name = $_. Group [0]. @entity.name

  CpuMin = $cpu. Minimum

  CpuAvg = $cpu. Average

  CpuMax = $cpu. Maximum

  MemMin = $mem. Minimum

  MemAvg = $mem. Average

  MemMax = $mem. Maximum

  }

  }

  $report | Sort-Object-property Datacenter, Cluster, VMHost name |

  Export Csv report.csv - NoTypeInformation - UseCulture

• Maximum CPU and RAM to the Virtual Image

  Hi all

  I have the host whose hardware 2 cpu machine each with 4 core that is all of the 8 and 16 GB of Ram. On this server image Linux single runs, which has mysql in there. currently image use 4 core processor and 4 GB of RAM.

  As I'm observing some performance issue, I want to increase cpu and memory allocated to the virtual machine.

  Can someone will let me know maximum CPU and RAM I can attribute to the image without destabilizing or errors.

  I'm under VMware ESXi 5.5.0

  Hi again mithrandirr,

  you don't have to worry about the allocation of CPU. The ESXi VMkernel is very flexible in terms of handling & plan the resources of the processor. You'd be fine same allocation the CPU power you have (so 2 Sockets x 4 cores per Socket) to the server. The CPU cycles are carried out on request if you don't have to worry about making your physical host fails or otherwise degraded performance. Therefore, you can go ahead and increase the number of base to 6 in what either I described above. Just for your information, the internal processes of the ESXi (referred to as 'worlds') always run on CPU logic 0 and consume very little resources.