Poor transfer rate using Converter standalone 5.0 compared to the 4.3

Similar Questions

• Tecra M9: 54mps transfer rate using WLan N standard

  Hi guys of

  I took possestion proud of my new Tecra M9 two days ago and have obviously been downgraded to Windows XP.

  The problem I have I bought a wireless router cable Buffalo WZR2 - G300N Nfiniti which has the new draft N Wireless feature to compliment the same feature on my new Tecra.

  Now, I have configured the router correctly by setting the wireless settings to allow protocols (BGN) so that other laptops from home receive a signal and I tried to use the standard Intel wireless drivers and drivers of buffalo on my Tecra wireless network card, but I always get only a maximum transfer rate of 54mps as apposed to the 300mps claimed to be honest.

  I never expect that speed but I expect more than the speed of a standard card.

  Any guys ideas and im starting to pull my hair out here that I love from the laptop the router lol.
  I look forward to your responses,

  Best wishes to you all

  DesktopGeek

  Hello

  You use an Intel Wlan card? If yes then you must update the Intel driver.
  See the Intel page for this.

  Second, you should check the settings of your router if the standard 802.11 N has been chosen.

  This is a useful page for Intel that describes the performance of 802.11 N standards.
  http://www.Intel.com/performance/mobile/wireless/index.htm
  You shouldn't too t wait. Theoretically, there should be an improvement of 5 x but I n t think you might be able to use the full 300Mbps.

  You should also try different WLan channels and use the additional Intel Proset WLan utility to configure the WiFi network.

  By the way; Don't forget to choose the standard 802.11 N Wlan card properties!

  Good bye

• Speed of P2V using Converter Standalone

  It has been a while since I P2V was something and I wanted to do a survey to see if there was something wrong with my setup or if that's just how Converter works.

  It is not a real P2V - I'm trying to move a virtual machine from a test server (ESXi 3.5) on our new production server (4.0) of vSphere. I used Standalone Converter to move the virtual machine, but he said he would take a whopping 6 hours. Converter was about 5-6 MB/s during the show, but our HDD 30 GB said that he would take 5 hours, which does not match correctly.

  Converter is usually this slow? Network cards are set to 1000-Full and our switch is set to Auto/Auto on ports.

  Hello

  I've been using VMware converter for several years and it allmost seems that the better (more), he gets - it gets the slower.

  Nowadays (build 4.0.1 161434) it is not uncommon for as little as 2 MB/s when it runs file copy level. Copies of level block and volume runs faster, but then you can't change of disksizes.

  My advice? Just be patient G

  Concerning

  André

• Using Converter Standalone for VM BU

  I am new to using the Standalone Converter product - it was recommended as a BU on the forum and looks like what it do what I need.  My plan is to use the converter to copy my VM development on a weekly basis, so I way to quick recovery if a machine virtual file corrupted (which I've known a few weeks ago and could not recover). I have a few questions first.

  (1) instant - I was wrong using snapshots as attempt by BU, rather than restore points.  Before I have try to use the converter to copy my VM should I delete all the snapshots? I read that remove a large snapshot "outdated" or old can damage a virtual computer.  Once I have the job of process BU converter I will use only instant as needed when changing configurations.

  (2) is there a preferred method is better for the copy of VM - market or stop? I have a local VM v1.05 server for the installation of the converter (WIN2K3 Ent) and a remote server ESX3i installed.

  (3) Vitual Center - before I knew the Standalone Converter, I installed Virtual center with a 90 day license - I have never completely configured, I would delete it but if it is not a problem, it can be.

  Any help will be appreciated,

  Max

  snapshots are good, but if you leave them running for the time period, they can 'eat' your disk space. Use them when you change something, if it works your snapshot validation, otherwise, go back to the restore point

  so, for backups, you can use VMware Converter.

  1 - Yes, remove your shots, but be careful with the "outdated", they could corrupt your VM. You can convert a running virtual machine that has snapshots, by installing the converter on it when it runs and make a copy while it is running. in this way, you take a picture of the instance that you want to

  2. you can do both (running and power off). you just be careful when the virtual machine is running if it has an application that can fail or does not maintain state (a database for example)

  3. it is not a problem that you remove VirtualCenter (as well as plugins, VMware Converter Enterprise along them)

  concerning

  Jose Ruelas

• How to convert physical linux in virtual machine using converter standalone.

  Is there any document/video step by step to make the Linux P2V?

  Hello

  In addition, I would like to point to this link:

  http://conshell.NET/wiki/index.php/Linux_P2V

  http://boink.pbworks.com/LinuxP2V

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=1002402

  It may be useful

  Best wishes / Saludos.
  Pablo

  Please consider awarding

  all useful or correct answer. Thank you!! -

  Por favor considered premiar

  any respuesta correcta o util. ¡¡MUCHAS gracias!

  Virtually noob blog

• vCenter Converter Standalone to vSphere Hypervisor

  Here's the situation.

  I would like to P2V convert an existing Windows 2000 Server and put the new virtual server in vSphere Hypervisor 5.1.

  Is this possible with the free vCenter Converter Standalone?  What version of the converter is what I use for P2V Server 2000 machine and I then have to use an older version of ESXI instead of vSphere Hypervisor 5.1?

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  The VMware converter, you can download it here... (https://my.vmware.com/web/vmware/evalcenter?p=converter) Click on the license and download tab and log in to your my account of VMware. You should see the latest version and all the last one available for download.

  ESXi 4.0, you can download it here... (https://my.vmware.com/web/vmware/evalcenter?p=free-esxi&lp=default). Once again, same procedure, click on the license and download tab and log in to your my account of VMware. You should see 4.1 and below (4, 4 Update 1... and so on) available for download.

  Good luck

  -Clark.

• Satellite L670-1KZ - 3 TB external hard drive use - transfer rate.

  Hello world

  This thread is a complement of my previous thread on 'Partition for 3 TB HD'.
  http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=67275

  As I said previously, I managed to merge the partition into one and I started the backup copy my blu - ray on my 3 TB, HD HD (usb / e-sata and e-sata / usb), my laptop HD (e-sata).

  For your info, when you get to 2 TB (30 MB/s HD to HD and 50 MB/s laptop HD on average up to 2 TB),
  the transfer rate is slowing down in hydro-huileuses, I now have around 10-15 MB/s average, of both laptop HD HD HD (now more than 10 to 15).

  Fortunately, this will affect only around, 740 GB remainning to fill, but it's really annoying over time.

  If someone can get a better transfer rate, please let me know (even on another laptop) your configuration.

  This cursed 3 TB HD is very good for the ability, but a hell to answer when you use HD HD! I can't imagine for 4 TB HD.

  I wonder what may be the transfer speed using usb3 since portable HD... And why he is so slow...

  Guillaume

  Oh, also, I forgot, I had a problem using this Storeva SilverDock U3 with the seagate 3 TB 7200 rpm on my laptop.

  1. it is impossible to disconnect using the safe disconnection. Whenever I switch on my laptop before off the dock. Never know that I won't take the risk to turn it off when it is connected to my laptop.

  2. when using this dock + my Antec MX-1 external box with inside 2 TB HD, I have some problems shooting with my files on the windows 'Explorer', the icon disappears, the image cannot be propely display (.jpg files).

  Maybe a video card problem or a problem of electricity? I say what I'm going to fill this 3 TB as soon as possible and never plug it back to my laptop.

  And, FYI, this dock + this HD is compatible with the H1 of Dune, the loading times are slightly longer than with a 2 to, used as internal or external on the Dune, maybe + 3/5 sec.

  I bought a 7200 RPM, but everyone knows that the 7200 are prohibited for dune used as internal, M1
  must use only 5400 RPM.

  I could make a Bernard for the temperature later and keep posted yu.

  Link to the docking station + HD Ref:
  Free HD 590 GB remaining: a single file of 33 GB = 1 H @ 13 >< 18mo/s="" (dock="" e-sata="" to="" hd="">

  + The message was edited: link removed - commercial websites not allowed.

• Windows 2008 R2 VM disk system increased substantially after moving from VM to ESXi host 5.1 to 5.5 ESXi host using vCenter Converter Standalone

  Hello:

  I moved a Windows 2008 R2 VM from a 5.1 ESXi host to an ESXi host 5.5 using vCenter Converter Standalone.  The c: / drive system passed largely to where I now have to extend the volume.  Is this normal/expected behavior?  Perhaps the conversion/move creates temporary files I can delete?

  Thanks much for the ideas.

  This is not the expected behavior.

  Size of the disk is defined during the conversion and which will not increase by its own during conversion.

  Now, you need to V2V, if you want to reduce the volume.

• Save an ESXi 4.0 virtual using the VCenter Converter Standalone

  I'm having a 'moment' here because it's been a while since I've done it.

  I have a Windows Server 2008 virtual machine running on ESXI 4.1. I want to make a one-time backup of the virtual. It's a Terminal Server I don't need of daily backups, etc.

  I have it in mind that I can do this with the VCenter Converter Standalone. I downloaded and installed version 5 of this.

  When I tried to communicate with the virtual virtual "Machine VMWare Infrastructure" using the converter drop-down I get this:

  Unable to reach the specified host 192.168.254.154. The host may not be available... or management on this host services do not react.

  The IP address is correct. Am I missing something here? Management services? I put the VM converter on this virtual server Client?

  The goal is to get the hard local machine in order to restore it in case of failure.

  Thank you very much.

  Mike Gallery

  you will need to have comments turned off for export as OVF, but you don't need to use the converter.

  Also, in the future, if you use the converter and a source of 'VMware Infrastructure virtual machine', the virtual machine must thus put off.

  .. .and to return the FVO in your inventory... File - deploy OVF

• Transfer rate between ESXi host using "Veem backup and FastSCP".

  Hi all

  I have two ESXi host connected with Eth - 1 G ports on an HP switch

  now I'm trying to transfer data between two hosts using "Veem backup and FastSCP" tool

  a 1 MB/s transfer rate is normal? you know a way to improve the performance of the network?

  Note that no collision or inadequacy not discovered on the way to the switch

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  This work is a line perhaps? If you use VMFS as target, you must double check the block size, if it is the default 1 MB, the maximum size of a vmdk disk is 256 GB.

  The value you got 274878668800 bytes, divided three times by 1024, gives you exactly 256.0007095336914 GB. This is probably the problem.

  PS: I saw your error screencap you come to Italy, visit us on the pages of Italian user :-) group

  Kind regards

  Luca.

  --
  Luca Dell'Oca
  http://www.vuemuer.it
  [reward points for a useful answer is a way of saying thanks]

• Transfer rate maximum by using IEEE 1394

  Hello

  I use an IEEE 1394 camera and I want to know how to be able to access the maximum transfer speed. Currently in the measurement and automation program I get access only to 100 Mbps, even though I know that the camera can do 800 Mbps. The initial pilot that I installed with the software was not compatible with Labview and so I had to downgrade the software a bit to be able to control the camera using Labview.

  Is there a difficulty in Labview or if they solved this problem in future versions of the software IMAQdx? I am running IMAQdx version 3.7.

  Thanking you,

  Adnan Sharief

  Are you by chance using XP (SP2 or SP3) or Vista?  If so, Microsoft has messed up their 1394b driver who fell from S800 to S100 speed, if the options are:

  upgrading to Win7

  downgrading the driver to the SP1 version

  use a driver of substitution that replaces the Microsoft driver (if your camera brand has access to a)

  Kind regards

  Scott

  PS I think this topic has answered elsewhere in this forum if you are looking for it

• Windows Server 2003 x 64 conversion using VMware vCenter Converter Standalone Boot CD error

  Hi all

  I downloaded "VMware vCenter Converter Standalone" v 4.0 and from this directory

  C:\Program VMware vCenter Converter Standalone

  I was able to find these ISO files:

  Converter-helper-vm - x 64 .iso - & gt; I have burn the CD it and then perform the reboot

  converter-for assistance - vm.iso

  However, during the boot, he went into the start of linux, and then he asked me a login and a password?

  What should I type here then?

  My goal is to be able to convert this physical machine in one. File VMDK to load later on ESXi or VMWare Server 2.0

  Thank you.

  Have you tried domain user and password?

• 3 GB MD033 Time Capsule data rate lowers up to 5 MB/s during the transfer of large files

  Hello, guys!

  My MD033 (2011) / 3GB TimeCapsule lowers throughput for the disk transfers built up to 5 MB/s.

  Is this a bug or feature?

  This bug has been present for early 2013. Since then, I changed 2 iMac 27 and 1 iMac, retina. Traded my TC three times by Apple Care coverage. Change a cable connection from TC to iMac twice. Problem remains. A persisted on all platforms of Cougar to El Capitan.

  Video which revealed a problem can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/b3ve9w53ixru5rv/IMG_0700.MOV?dl=0

  It ALWAYS happens. No exclusion. Sooner or later, transfer rate drops to 3-5 MB/s

  NOTHING similar happens when I copy a large file to a PS located in the same network. 50 - 70 MB/s ever.

  I just work on the same problem thread.

  irregular flow oddly with two TCs problem

  It starts fast and then slows down to a crawl.

  I don't solve it on the other thread... so let me ask how much patience you have and the ability to diagnose network problems?

  I don't have a miracle solution... money.

  (Actually a single shot of a 3030 fix it permanently..!)

  If you are willing to continue what I'm happy to try...

  NOTHING similar happens when I copy a large file to a PS located in the same network. 50 - 70 MB/s ever.

  This indicates that the TC is not the question... It's the Mac that has problems. (PS = PlayStation?)

  In the Mac

  You must have OFF wireless.

  It is better to use Configuration ethernet with link-local only for IPv6, except if you need full IPv6... Tell me if this is the case.

  I do the same thing you are. But I can't reproduce your slowdown.

  

  Open the activity monitor and track your use of the CPU. A single process hits 30% usage during playback... Therefore, it is quite high.

  

  Also check the network. Read (green) and Write (red) make the perfect range scans.

  

  I wonder if the TCP window is set incorrectly by default in your computers... I use a Mac Mini i7 with SSD is fast but 2011.

  It is difficult while I can't reproduce the problem.

• What is the interface transfer rate ata in hp Pavilion g4-1117dx

  I'm looking to replace the hard drive for my hp Pavilion 1117dx g4 with an ssd. I would like to know if the existing hard drive interface comes out with a transfer rate of 6G ssd? Thank you

  Hello

  SATA III (or 3) is backward compatible. No problem at all. But if you want to know, you can check yourself by using the following small program (look for the disk controller):

  http://www.cpuid.com/downloads/PC-Wizard/2014.2.13-Setup.exe

  Kind regards.

• HP Elitebook 8570p - Windows XP USB very slow and the transfer rate performance issues.

  Hello. I was wondering if anyone else knows some performance issues with the HP Elitebook 8570p and Windows XP Pro - SP3.

  I get a VERY slow start, general poor performance (waiting time when opening files and programs).

  I asked to burn in tests that show that everything is good.

  USB transfer rates are VERY slow (tried all ports of a Seagate FreeAgent USB drive, which works fine on other laptops etc.) for example a 30-minute transfer a 7gig single file of the USB HD on the desktop. Only 3 minutes to do the same on another laptop.

  I think there are problems with the drivers, like Windows 7 works very well and does boot from a bootable USB.

  USB transfer rate are also good when starting from a Windows boot environment.

  I installed HP SoftPaq Download Manager, and all the drivers are up to date.

  Hello:

  I think outside of the box here... Select the Intel (r) 7 Series Chipset Family SATA AHCI Controller instead.

  If it does not, I raise the white flag.

  Paul