Poor video performance

Similar Questions

• Satellite P100 PSPAD: could not update the BIOS 3.8 and a poor video performance

  Hello

  I have a video performance of bad quality on my machine as well as the fan power of the issues.

  To add to my frustration the WinPhlash program included in the BIOS version 3.8 empty out trying to flash which gives a PHLASHNT. SYS failed to load the message with different error codes (codes 5 and 147 depending if I launch the exe, as it is extracted from the ZIP, or run the files extracted independently).

  I checked all permissionings on the record and I definitely full control - but still a generic message of "check your accounts, if you do not have permissions please log in again!" is displayed.

  help with my problem of BIOS would be apreciated.

  [Edited by: admin on July 6, 2007 11:10]

  Hello

  but as the average it s absolutely the safest office upgrade firmware on at the level of the BACK. Or at least using the UBCD4Win, which is a beautiful cd live windows for maintenance.

  Welcome them

• Poor video performance on a cold start

  I have a question where I get poor fps in games on a cold start, but if I restart the computer, the fps is ok.  I used Passmark 3D Mark test to try to understand what was going on.  The graphics card is a GeForce GTX 770.  On a cold start mark 3D score was 2924 which is much too weak for this card.  I then restarted the computer and retested and got a score of 6710 which is just in the range that should be the 770.  I think that the rules on a graphics card problem.  This could be a Windows problem?  I am running Windows 7 Home Premium.  I hope someone can give me an answer to this.

  Thanks for your help, Paul

  It is not a Windows problem.

  Do you also have lower frame rates when you play a game without having to reboot?

  If this isn't the case, don't worry about this. Synthetic benchmarking tools cause many people cancel you worry.

  .

• Satellite L30-134 - question about upgrade CPU and video performance

  Hi have updated my satellite l30 - 134 with a bus t2450 dual core @2 ghz 533 Mhz = cpu is runing swell-marks look nice... BUT - my video performance droped a lot - grafics 2d - to top but 3d grafics are very poor why? driver problem?
  have also 2 g ram 2 x 1 g kinmax @ 6xx runing @533

  can anyone help? see that are some similar configs on this site... then maybe you can help me
  I'll try editing a xp 64 bit (curently runing xp sp3 32-BIT)

  > I'll try editing a xp 64 bit (curently runing xp sp3 32-BIT)
  Forget that don t recommend install Win XP 64-bit.
  Why? Because the Win XP 64 bit was not so popular as Win 32 bit or Vista/Win 7 64 bit and you won't find many drivers for Win XP 64 bit.
  Stay with XP 32 bit or you can change to Win 7 64 bit.

  Regarding the graphical issue;
  Have you noticed that also using the old CPU (Intel Celeron M Processor 410)?
  If this were not the case, then I guess this could be a problem between the CPU and BIOS.
  Otherwise I would recommend upgrading the graphics card driver.

• How to increase video performance

  I have a Horizon view 6 environment that is used by 100 users. Clients run with a resolution of 1280 x 1024 and have 2 vCPU and 3 GB of RAM.

  It works all fine, except that the vidéoperformance is poor. Watch a video in fullscreen on Youtube does not smooth at all. And also minimize and maximize a window or dragging does not work smoothly.

  I tried a few settings like turn on 3d rendering and adjusting the maximum video memory, but nothing seems to make a difference.

  Is it possible to improve video performance?

  I disabled the 3D setting, but I also discovered that view agent has not been installed to the base image...

  After a restructuring with the agent of the view, the reasonable played video!

• Video performance, Windows XP and Windows 7

  I tried to watch videos HD with Windows 7, but it was not very good. The image would stop and start then the audio rolled on. I went back to XP and is surprised that the 1280 x 720 mkv file worked fine under XP. It was not perfect, there were a couple of hicups, but which could be caused by other programs that run in the background or the need to defrag the hard drive.

  That tells me that the problem of video performance is not so much a physical limitation, as is a video driver issue and the driver XP is more capable than the video driver Windows 7, at least the current version of it.

  Edmund,

  Intel has a video update driver Win 7 for the Chipset 945 dated 15/09/2009, which greatly improves video performance. Also, what do you use for a media player? I use VLC and it works well...

  Jeff

• Audio SoundMAX is in conflict with a video performance, XP Pro 32 bit, both P4 processors.

  I use Windows XP Pro 32 bit on a two processor system Pentium 4 with audio integrated graphics on motherboard Intel, only 1 GB of RAM.
   
  I have the last update I can find for the Soundmax audio software and driver needed my Intel motherboard, but when it is installed, the online and offline video playback is jerky.

  When uninstalled Soundmax, video performance is improved, but I can't not to use other audio codecs or audio legacy available on the system, so no sound.  I'd be happy to abandon SoundMax if I could do it.

  If everything seems to be in working order, lets take a look at volume mixer and make sure that nothing is cut.

  To do this, right click on the small speaker in the lower right and choose "Open Volume Control"

  Check that nothing is being muted or turned down here.

  =================

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/no-sound-help#no-sound=Windows-XP&V1H=win8tab1&V2H=win7tab1&V3H=winvistatab1&v4h=winxptab2

  a troubleshooting guide, go through the steps and I would like to know the results.

• Very bad audio and video performance

  I have a Pavilion dm1 laptop running Windows 7.  When I got all first the machine audio and video performance was very good.  However, towards the end of last year the performance for audio and video has become extremely slow.  Still, the sound stutters even without video.

  I used the tools to clean the registry, updated (or verified) all drivers I can think, but nothing has not improved.

  Maybe related, but less to worry about because it is necessary that in rare occasions, boot has become very slow too.

  I think I have tracked down a part of the problem by chance.

  Normally, I start my DM1 when connected to various devices of office as keyboards etc.  These are all plugged into the USB ports.  As the boot begins there very long delays in the process.  And when the boot ends stuttering audio and video as described.  However, if no USB device is attached during the boot process, start happening quickly and the audio/video all work fine.

• After Windows updates Feb 10-11, I "bmmp" noise in my audio which effects my audio/video performance.

  * Original title: System Restore

  Windows 7 Home Premium

  Dell XPS L502X

  Intel Core i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20 GHz

  8 GB RAM

  After Windows updates Feb 10-11, I "bmmp" noise in my audio which effects my audio/video performance. The video freezes for a split second. I tried system restore several times, but my computer could not be restored to several dates I've tried. If I do not solve the problem today, tomorrow morning I'll try an advanced recovery method. I have a Windows 7-64 bits of the operating system at the same time, graphics cards Intel and Nividea. I had this same problem several times since I got the computer (Dell). Dell has replaced some hardware. Previously, he was my Western Digital external hard drive software that caused the problem. After that I deleted the software from the computer, the problem has been resolved.

  Does anyone have any ideas on how I could get the system restore to work? Or another suggestion that might help solve the problem?

  Thank you

  Joe

  Hello

  This can help you:

  1. If you are using Norton, you should disable Norton inviolable Protection before using the system restore.

  http://Service1.Symantec.com/support/sharedtech.nsf/pfdocs/2005113009323013

  AVG will cause problems with SR too.

  «Temporarily disable AVG»

  http://www.Avg.com/ww-en/FAQ.Num-3857

  2. try to use Safe Mode system restore.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/products/features/system-restore

  "Start your computer in safe mode.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Start-computer-safe-mode#start-computer-safe-mode=Windows-7

  3 Malware will stop at the system restore.

  Download, install, update and scan your system with the free version of Malwarebytes AntiMalware:

  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free

  ____________________________________________

  And some information for you about Windows updates:

  Microsoft gives sometimes you updates for the 3rd party hardware: graphics, network cards, etc.

  You should only get the latest drivers for them to real hardware manufacturer's website, as Microsoft normally does nor those have the most recent drivers available as Microsoft relies of the 3rd party hardware Manufactuer to provide.

  But unfortunately, the only way to know which is the update of the problem is to install them one by one, until you find the 'wrong' for your installation.

  You can do a system restore to get back until it has been installed (which is NOT the best way to remove an update) or follow this method:

  'Remove an update - Windows 7'

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/remove-update#1TC=Windows-7

  When you have found the issue of update of the list of updates which is presented > then right click on the update problem > select Hide update > and it will not be available to you once again

  "How to hide or restore the updates of Windows hidden in Windows 7 and Windows 8"

  http://www.SevenForums.com/tutorials/24376-Windows-Update-hide-restore-hidden-updates.html

  _____________________________________________

  Here's how to chanage update settings, if you think it is necessary to:

  "Understanding Windows Update and Extras in Windows Vista and Windows 7.

  http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/Windows-Vista-updates-and-extras/

  Or the other of these two update settings will give you the chance to see what you want to install through Windows updates;

  Download updates but let me choose whether to install them - if you select this option, Windows will download the updates on your computer, but not install them automatically. If you want to install updates, then you must install them manually. You should only select this option if you have a reason to not install updates automatically. Only advanced users should use this option.

  Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them - if you select this option, you'll be alerted when there are new updates available for download and install. You can then choose to download and install the updates that you want. This option should really be reserved for people who know exactly which updates they need, or those who have little access to the Internet.

  But remember you normally only have problems with hardware 3rd party drivers. Other updates are to improve the Performance and security of your system

  See you soon.

• View 5.3: video performance worse PCOIP

  Hi, we evaluate 5.3 view and we found problems with the user experience. See 5.2 for us seems better, but we can't find the explanation:

  1-view direct connection of the Agent (VADC) disturbing Flash video. It's really strange, but when connect us directly to a computer virtual with VADC, Flash video is jerky. More strange, if the mouse cursor is on the video, it's OK, but apart from the video, it's bad. It is easy to test: connect to view VM directly with VADC (no not from VCS server), open the Youtube video and test. This disorder is not happen when Connect Server VCS. We have opened a ticket for Vmware, but we get no help. Instead, they said look at the Administrator's guide (come on Vmware, we don't not children are first using Vmware View, try to reproduce the problem instead of wasting our time).

  2 - the overall video performance is worse under PCOIP session. We all try: with or without acceleration pool 3D, with or without Feature Pack, with or without MMR activated, increase the video RAM, VM, etc.. Settings change default PCOIP with view 5.3? We tested using tape to point out 1080 p, 1920 x 1200 movie trailer. It is always best to view 5.2. We do not store FPS but just to watch it's obvious.

  All tests were conducted in a new installation in an evaluation environment. Same network and exactly the same configuration of our 5.2 view production environment. Default configuration of Sami PCOIP. For tests, we use new server Dell R620, 96 GB of RAM, ESXi 5.5, vcenter 5.5.0a device, only 5 VM in the not persistent pool, 1, 5 GB of ram by computer virtual, local storage s (15K rpm raid 1 drive).

  There is really great news with 5.3, but for now we think that it is not ready to put into production. Does anyone have an explanation or indications of us? Thank you!

  We live the same with the direct connection plugin (Desktone). With the mouse on the video is perfect. the mouse out of the flash window, and the performance is bad.

  disable the "VMware Flash Optimizer' help.

• MI 09 MBP 17 "NVIDIA GeForce 9600 M GT 512 MB minimum required the longevity of video performance for PS CC 2014?

  My 2009 Middle 17 "MBP is equipped with graphics card NVIDIA GeForce 9600 M GT 512 MB, which is the minimum requirement of video performance for PS CC 2014. How long this can be sufficient for the Adobe programs? Decide if he still need to improve this MacTop to SSD, pass to the end of 2011 MBP 17 (AMD G Card) or handed to nine 2013 MBP 15 ".

  I doubt very seriously that anyone from Adobe is likely to chime and say something like 'your graphics card will be sufficient until xx/yy/201z', nor give any indication as to what their plans are for the system requirements for their next version release.  They just don't do that.

  If you want advice on what equipment will be sufficient for your planned activity in Photoshop, you'll need describe this activity in significant detail.  What kind of editing you plan to do?  On how many images?  What size and depth?  You get the idea.

  On a somewhat related note, upper my company engineer has recently decided to buy a high range vs iMac a new Mac Pro.  He is very happy with his choice.

  -Christmas

• Intel SRCS16 on ESX4 - poor write performance

  Hello world!

  I need to change HD on one of my ESX hosts that have only 250 GB of total space, while we buy 5 HD 1 TB.

  This weekend, I put another control (Intel SRCS16) Raid and connect a 1 TB just to copy a VM of old HD to the new.

  Matrix Raid took less than 1 min.

  Creation of partition on the raid drive took less than 1 min. (with fdisk)

  Partition formatting took more than 3 hours (with mkfs.ext3)

  Test write performance with: time dd if = / dev/zero of=/mnt/share/test.test bs = 1 M count = 1024

  And took approximately 18 min. (1 Mb/s)

  Research on google, I find some useful links.

  On the Vmware communities, I found this: http://communities.VMware.com/thread/105552?start=0 & tstart = 0

  But it does not work.

  Someone has an idea?

  Thanks for your help

  SRCS16 Intel has some extremely poor write performance without cache enabled writable. For normal operations with write cache, you should have BBWC (battery backup). Enabling write without BBWC cache may lead to the loss of data in case of power failure.

  UPD. See http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/server/srcs16/sb/cs-020502.htm.

• Poor video quality on M40X

  Toshiba M40x, I've installed quicktime, but the video quality is still poor in best mode. How this can be improved.

  Hello

  And what video you mean? If I watch TV online video is poor but nothing for this.

  Be more specific in your request.

• looking to improve video performance in HP p7-1219

  Hi... as stated in the subject line, I have a HP p7-1219. I would like to elaborate a little bit, I already upgraded the RAM to 8 GB of the 4 original, and I think that the other important thing that I could have an impact without spending hundreds would be video and graphics performance. My daughter did a little play, some stuff like Minecraft and I would like to try a bit of game... nothing too extravagant, I was never a great player.

  It's the video card, that I'm looking:

  ZOTAC GeForce GT 610 2GB DDR3 PCI - E graphics card

  My rudimentary knowledge, I think it may be compatible... but would like the entry of someone more knowledgeable than me.

  Any help is appreciated!

  Please see Newegg.ca - GTX 650 Ti graphics cards for the best selection at the best price. You will also need to upgrade of power to meet the minimum requirements of the chosen graphics card. Please look at the Corsair CX500, CX600, CX500M and CX600M of your power supply needs.

  If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

  Please click the White Star of KUDOS to show your appreciation

• Poor search performance clustered with table of singles (100 k)

  In a data entry project, I created a data type to store regular data. I have a cluster (see photo) which consists of a name, StringData, Numericaldata and ArrayOfSinglesData (predefined 100points k). Thus, every piece of data can be a scalar string, scalar number or an array of numbers.

  I then do a picture of this for all of my variables, maybe 150 or more.

  Works well, but the performance when adding new data (search for the exact name) is pretty poor.  Very high CPU and many even page faults for the slow connection like 1 to 10 times per second.

  The entrance to the data add method is an array of (stringname, DataString). So for each new data I loop over all the variables, find the one with the correct name string and add new data (replce the scalar chain and the number, add to arrayOfSingles).

  Given that I have 150 variable, as I thought a linear search should be ok, but probably the program moves also around 100 k singles for each comparison, or it's my idea at least.

  Can you suggest which is a good thing to do to improve performance?

  I added a search binary smarter, but it was necessary to sort variables, and since I have two names for each variable (called internal and external) that I use when you add, it helped only for half of the research.

  If I find the time I would like to divide the cluster so that all ArrayOfSingles are separated, but maybe you can tell me immediately if it is useful?

  (Labview, 2012sp1)

  Like Gerds link watch I suppose you're looping in the table looking for your name?

  I just tested, and using DVR to extract only the ID and grabbing then a single element are fast enough. I will attach my test so you can try it for yourself.

  /Y