Port on fabric interconnet channel

Similar Questions

• "Message: Port ' Serial0/0/0: Channel 9-carrier" is down on the device

  Hi guys;

  I got this message on my first Cisco 2911 remote router, the office works well, the phone system. I got alerts like every 15 minutes goes down and up. The message is by email.

  "Message: Port ' Serial0/0/0: Channel 9-carrier" is down on the device

  all thank you toughts

  Hi Juan,

  I also face the same issue on my port of the switch. What advice of TAC engineer owes me:

  1. set up ' no snmp don't trap the status of the link ' on the interface

  2 - re - sync the device.

  Kind regards

  Raffy

• How to check the use of the channels of port on fabric of interconnection?

  Hi all

  Is there a mechanism to view and export the use of ports or port channel fabric Interconnect 6248.

  I need to export for the last 15 days. Is there a command or options in the GUI I can export it

  Greetings.

  Native statistics are unlikely to give you a historical trend for the period you're looking for.  See the monitoring/stats for the UCSM system section for more information on the rules of collection of statistics.  The default value for the period appears to be 2 hrs to watch statistics table.

  You can look something like manage performance UCSr, which can do a trend and will retain much historical perspective of production like detailed.

  For a short term in UCSM view, click the LAN tab, then a given port channel, in the right pane statistics, chart and "configure chart" to add in the box counters as "total number of bytes.

  Thank you

  Kirk...

• 6248 fabric interconnects FC interfaces and MDS ports license

  Hello

  I need help. I need to configure port-channel of CF between 2 x 9148 MDS and 2 x Cisco fabric interconnects. My main problem here is interfaces CF appear not on the fabric of interconnections (UCS Manager). I don't see ethernet ports. I have to turn on the unified ports or do I license for CF?

  I also connected the ds-sfp-fc8g-sw FPS but I get the error "operation status failed, reason: SFP Validation failed.

  Another thing, all 48 FC ports on switches DMS 9148 acquire the license. Aren't they supposed to come with 16 ports enabled by default?

  Any ideas?

  Hi Selby

  6248 FI unified ports, by default, all are Ethernet; so as a first step, you must configure the FC ports.

  You just need Ethernet port licenses, which are also universal.

  See, for example.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3763853#3763853

  For SDM 9148 licenses take a look on

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/storage-networking/MDS-9148-multilayer-fabric-switch/data_sheet_c78-571411.html

  There are packages with

  Cisco MDS 9148 48 - Port Multilayer Fabric Switch with 16, 32 or 48 active ports of 8 Gbps

  Good luck

• Module adaptation NOR - 6581 FlexRIO - Can one single port of IO have a few lines of channel defined as inputs and some defined as outputs?

  Hello

  I use a 6581 with 7965R FlexRIO FPGA module adaptation module. E/s/Port CLIP Module allows to configure a port as an input or output, but I would first of all a line of a port as an exit channel and the remaining lines of seven channels as inputs, it is possible to do?

  Thank you

  Maurice.

  Hello Maurice.

  The 6581 adaptation module can only change direction based on port (not on a basis of individual line).  This can be seen in the specs here.  There are other modules of digital adapter that support by the steering control of channels such as the NOR 6583.  The NI 6583 35 single ended e/s and the input/output LVDS (or mLVDS).

  Kind regards

• A full Port-channel should be blocking?

  I had a topology.

  Everything has been properly configured, I veried all channels ports work on all switches... all hosts can talk to each other in their VLAN respective.

  I had trunks on all links between all switches.

  My show etherchannel summary indicates the Port Channel is GOOD if:

  SW1 #show etherchannel summary

  Flags: D - low P - port-channel

  I have - autonomous s - suspended

  H Eve (LACP only)

  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2

  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  u - unfit to tied selling

  w waiting to be aggregated

  d default port

  Number of channels in use: 2

  Number of aggregators: 2

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group

  ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

  1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gig0/1 (P) Gig0/2 (P)

  However, you will notice that the two ports Gigabit (1 channel Port on this switch) are ORANGE... which means BLOCKED... .and this has been verified when I ran see the spanning tree on this switch

  If it's supposed to happen?

  Yes, even if these links were green in your portchannel LACP always would play you a loop, for this purpose, he blocked because of the fact that you have more links (aggregate bandwidth) between other switches so it is allowing more transmission between.

• SH cdp neighbors port-channel command

  Hello

  I have a strange problem with the command sh cdp neighbors port-channel on my 3750 and 4500switches.

  When I execute the command ' sh cdp neighbors port-channel. I don't see my say on this interface.

  The command 'sh cdp nei' with the port-channel works very well and shows all my neighbors.

  switch #sh cdp neighbors port-channel 1

  Ability code: R - router, T - bridge Trans, B - road Source bridge
  S switch, H - host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - phone.
  D / remote, C - AEVC, M - two port Mac relay

  Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Port platform capability ID
  

  switch #sh ether summary
  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
  I have - autonomous s - suspended
  H Eve (LACP only)
  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  M - don't use, minimum contacts not satisfied
  u - unfit to tied selling
  w waiting to be aggregated
  d default port

  Number of channels: 1

  Number of aggregators: 2

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
  1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gi1/0/1 (P) article gi1/0/2 P)
  

  I tried the command on multiple versions of IOS, but always the same question. When I try the command on a 6506-E, it works fine...

  This ordering platform is connected?

  SWITCH2 # sh etherchannel summary
  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
  I have - autonomous s - suspended
  H Eve (LACP only)
  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
  U - N running - is not in service, no aggregation
  f cannot allocate an aggregator

  M not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links has not met
  m don't use, port do not associate due to not meeting minimum links
  u - unfit to tied selling
  d default port

  w waiting to be aggregated
  Number of channels: 7
  Number of aggregators: 7

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
  1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gi1/1 (P) Gi1/2 (P)
  ...

  SWITCH2 #sh cdp nei port-channel 1
  Ability code: R - router, T - bridge Trans, B - road Source bridge
  S switch, H - host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater, P - phone

  Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Port platform capability ID
  switch to Gig 1 / 2 123 S I Gig 1/0/1
  switch to Gig 1 / 1 123 S I Gig 1/0/2
  

  Thank you

  Best regards

  Joris

  Hi Joris,

  It is a known problem and is documented as a cosmetic bug internal. Logically speaking, CDP is not supported on etherchannel interfaces and 'sh cdp port-channel' command should not be available.

  The platform of 6500, although the "port channel show cdp neighbor" returns the result, it's just for convenience and does not mean that the CDP is supported on the port channels. In fact, if you try to enable CDP on port-channel on 6500, it generates an error:

  PO1 #int 6500 (config)

  6500(Config-if) #cdp en

  % CDP is not supported on this interface, or for this encapsulation

  If you run "debug cdp events", you can see the packets exchanged on the physical interface rather than on the port-channel. Correct way is to check the neighborship of the cdp on the physical interfaces.

  See you soon,.

  Shashank

  Please rate if you find the content useful

• IOS NXOS VPC PORT channel

  Hello

  I have a pair of Nexus 5 K in an area of the VPC and few 2960's as members of the VPC, with a port to the domain channel.

  Topology is:

  5K 1 and 5 K 2 in the area of the VPC

  VPC 5 1 K and 5 K 2 to 2960

  2960 a gi0/1 and gi0/2 in 1 port channel

  Gi0/1 5 k 1, gi0/2 5 k 2

  I know what I'm going to ask can be completely against the purpose of the VPC, but I'm looking for a way to promote gi0/1 for traffic, rather than balancing on gi0/1 and gi0/2. The reaon for this is I want to take advantage of the absence of loop that provides mail ORDER, but would also like to have a link primary and secondary, as the majority of traffic should in fact go through 5K 1, rather than 5 K 2.

  Any suggestion is welcome.

  Thanks in advance

  Anthony

  Hi Anthony,.

  The Cisco NX - OS software load balance traffic across all operational interfaces in a portchannel by chopping the addresses in a numeric value that selects one of the links in the channel. Port channels provides default load balancing. It uses IP addresses, MAC addresses or layer port numbers 4 to select the port-channel-balancing link of the load. The port-channel load balancing uses the source or destination or port addresses, or both the source and ports or destination addresses.

  You can configure the mode of load balancing to be applied to all port channels that are configured on all of the device, or the specified modules. Each module configuration takes precedence over the configuration of load balancing for the entire device. You can configure a single mode of load balancing for the whole device, a different mode for specified

  modules and another mode of the other specified modules. You can not configure the port-channel load balancing method.

  You can configure the type of balancing algorithm used. You can choose the balancing algorithm that determines which Member port to select for the evacuation traffic by looking at the fields of the frame.

  Note: The mode of load balancing by default for layer 3 interfaces is the IP source and destination address, and the mode of the load balancing by default for non - IP interfaces is the source MAC address and destination.

  The configuration mode, you can try different method of load-balancing,

  port-channel - the balance of the load {dest-ip-port | dest-ip-port-vlan |}

  destination-ip-vlan. destination-mac | destination-port | source-dest-ip-port | source-dest-ip-port-vlan. source-dest-ip-vlan. source-dest-mac | source-dest-port | Source-ip-port | Source-ip-port-vlan. Source-ip-vlan. source-mac | source-port} [number of the module]

  To sum up: I can't tell which port would be chosen, it depends purely on image type you send with the combination method of load balancing.

  After you change you know also from the command which link takes the traffic.

  NEXUS2-SPAN # show the port-channel - the balance of the charge-transfer port-channel 71 src - ip 1.1.1.1 route dst - ip 2.2.2.2 VLANs 51 2 interface module

  Module 2: Missing params will be substituted by 0.

  Load balancing algorithm: src - dst ip-l4port

  RBH: port id out 0xb0: Ethernet8/8

  We can try also to rework the same NLB on the 2960 also. Is it purely depends on the algorithm of load balancing. Below is for 2960 balancing tweaking,

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960/software/release/12.2_53_se/configuration/guide/swethchl.html

  Even after doing this that I wouldn't say 100 percent, he would choose a link.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you

  Richard.

  * Rate if this is useful

• Fail to implement channel ports in cisco 3750 and ESXi 4u1

  I have set up a vswitch with a rising and electric connection for multiple VLANs. Everything works fine, when the network admin replicate the configuration in a second network port and set up a port with two interfaces channel all my communication with my network management interface is lost, but the test of the esxi management network is successful.

  The vswitch using ip hash and the use of the pswitch political of the src-dst-ip.

  Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

  F.F.: This is the configuration of the switch:

  interface
  GigabitEthernet1/0/17
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport
  trunk mode
  switchport nonegotiate
  channel-group mode 3 on
  spanning tree
  PortFast trunk
  spanning tree enable bpduguard
  
  interface
  GigabitEthernet1/0/7
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport
  trunk mode
  switchport nonegotiate
  channel-group mode 3 on
  spanning tree
  PortFast trunk
  spanning tree enable bpduguard
  
  interface
  Port-canal3
  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
  switchport
  trunk mode
  switchport nonegotiate
  spanning tree portfast trunk
  spanning tree
  bpduguard enable
  
  port-channel-src-dst-ip load balancing

  Take-off of VLANs allowed 4094... the native should not be part of the traffic that will flow on the link...

• Configuring the additional server ports

  Hi, if I use 2 ports per chassis of the server and want to add another 2, in addition to plug the cables and the settings, on the interconnection ports to "Set up as a Server Port" y at - it something else which is necessary and there is no interruption of traffic?

  Hello David,.

  If the links between IOM and FI server ports are individual links, then you will recognize the chassis to initialize the new links. This will cause disturbances of the network for a few seconds.

  There is no need to re - recognize the chassis if there is a channel of port of fabric between the IOM and FI.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.html#concept_5D3D88341BFB43468B62B5A77876C67B

  HTH

  Padma

• UCS C420M3 server with VIC 1225, can't see the ethernet LOM ports

  Hi Guyz,

  We have C420M3 server with VIC 1225 connected on PCIe slot, with fabric Interconnet.

  After you have installed the OS & drivers, vNIC created the VIC 1225 by the service profile appear, but 4 gig on server LOM ports do not appear.

  Any idea. ?

  Thank you

  If you incorporate your rack server to UCSM, you will be able to use the LOM ONLY ports for traffic of Mgmt, when you join the server mode to 'Dual Wire'.

  It is useless (unless you have one for a special reason, I do not intend at this very moment) to use ports LOM, once you entered the server, precisely because of the 1225 VIC is not a regular NIC card or a regular HBA, it is indeed a CNA (Converged Network Adapter), which essentially allows you to do in a map , what you would do with two (which means "what you would do with a NETWORK card and HBA separated')

  When you have a VIC card, you actually have the ability to create up to 256 virtual interfaces (this is the capacity of the equipment, always limited by the operating system, please keep this in mind), this is the reason why, after the server is integrated, entirely rely on the interfaces in the Service profile instead of the physical interfaces.

  Find more info here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/interfaces-modules/unified-computi...

  You have a specific reason to use the LOM ports rather than create 2 additional virtual interfaces in Server Service profile?

  -Kenny

• Battery M8024-k (pair) M3048 (pair) battery gal, VLAN and port groups?

  Hi all

  I'm getting more confused by the minute.  I have a pair of M8024-k blade switches in a M1000e enclosure, outside, I have a pair of N3048 switches.

  I think I have the job of stacking on the M8024-k, but I found a configuration guide for Simple mode that says take port 17-20 outside the Group of ports on the pair aggregation and leave the stack ports and internally in the PA Group.  When I do that they remain outside the group, if I do it in the CLI or the GUI.

  Does anyone have a configuration guide that shows how I can pair trunk the 2 together and allow 4 VLAN that I keep coming without access to blade servers inside?  What I get out of simple mode on the M8024-k to achieve?

  Any help gratefully received.

  

  The best source of information is going to be the user guides.

  www.Dell.com/.../manuals

  www.Dell.com/.../manuals

  I would wear the 8024-k off simple mode.

  Console# not simple mode

  On two batteries, you will need to aggregate 4 ports together.  Here is an example to place a port in an aggregation group.

  Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/5

  Console (Config-if-1/0/5) # channel-group mode 1 (active / Auto)

  Once the ports are in a channel-group 1, we can then configure the channel group to perform for several VLANs.

  Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

  trunk mode console (config-if-po1) #switchport

  #switchport console (config-if-po1) trunk allowed vlan add 2-150

  This is done, you should have connectivity.

  Keep us informed.

• Port Channerl - LACP Mode

  Hello, I defined an Interface Port - channel in LACP mode, in a switch Catalyst 3850:

  !
  Interface Port-Channel 4
  switchport mode access
  end

  To this port-channel interface, I associate two interfaces:

  !
  interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4
  Description - PC03-ADM -.
  switchport mode access
  channel-group mode 4 passive
  end

  YN-NW-GB06-170 #sh run int g2/0/4
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 120 bytes
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet2/0/4
  Description - PC03-ADM -.
  switchport mode access
  channel-group mode 4 passive
  end

  When I check the status of the interfaces, I see:

  YN-NW-GB06-170 #sh etherchannel 4 Synt.
  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
  I have - autonomous s - suspended
  H Eve (LACP only)
  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  M - don't use, minimum contacts not satisfied
  u - unfit to tied selling
  w waiting to be aggregated
  d default port

  Number of channels in use: 4
  Number of aggregators: 4

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
  Po4 (SU) 4, Gi1/0/4 (P) LACP Gi2/0/4 (s)

  YN-NW-GB06-170 #sh int g1/0/4
  GigabitEthernet1/0/4 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  Equipment is Gigabit Ethernet, the address is f078.16c4.fb04 (bia f078.16c4.fb04)
  Description: - PC03-ADM -.
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/s, 10 DLY usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Full duplex, 1000 Mbps, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
  input stream control is turned off, output flow control is not supported
  Type of the ARP: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00
  Last entry from 00:00:12, exit ever, blocking of output never
  Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 0
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bps, 0 packets/s
  5 minute output rate 578000 bps, 489 packets/s
  6345 packets input, 808991 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 3591 broadcasts (241 multicasts)
  0 Runts, 0 giants, 0 shifters
  entry 0, 0 CRC errors, frame 0, saturation 0, 0 ignored
  Watchdog 0, 241 multicast, break 0 comments
  entry packets 0 with condition of dribble detected
  1674339 packets output, 183387434 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets
  unknown protocol 0 drops
  0 babbles, collision end 0, 0 deferred
  carrier, 0 no carrier, lost 0 0 interrupt output
  output buffer, the output buffers 0 permuted 0 failures
  YN-NW-GB06-170 #sh int g2/0/4
  GigabitEthernet2/0/4 is up, line protocol is down (suspended)
  Equipment is Gigabit Ethernet, the address is f0b2.e591.d284 (bia f0b2.e591.d284)
  Description: - PC03-ADM -.
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/s, 10 DLY usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  KeepAlive set (10 sec)
  Full duplex, 1000 Mbps, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
  input stream control is turned off, output flow control is not supported
  Type of the ARP: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00
  Last entry, never, never hang output
  Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/2000/0/0 (size/max/drops/dumps); Total output drops: 0
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bps, 0 packets/s
  5 minute output rate 0 bps, 0 packets/s
  0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 0 emissions (0 multicasts)
  0 Runts, 0 giants, 0 shifters
  entry 0, 0 CRC errors, frame 0, saturation 0, 0 ignored
  Watchdog 0, multicast 0, break 0 comments
  entry packets 0 with condition of dribble detected
  138082 packets output, 26616915 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 3 interface resets
  unknown protocol 0 drops
  0 babbles, collision end 0, 0 deferred
  carrier, 0 no carrier, lost 0 0 interrupt output
  output buffer, the output buffers 0 permuted 0 failures
  # YN-NW-GB06-170

  I ask, this is the normal behavior of interfaces in this mode, or I made mistake.

  Please your help in this matter.

  Kind regards.

  Fernando.

  Read this article:

  http://anotheritblog.NET/2014/08/19/Windows-Server-2012-LACP-NIC-teaming-on-Cisco-Catalyst/

  I think that once you change the mode on the Cisco end will be correct.

• 4 GB with Etherchannel connected to a Dell server ports

  Hello

  I need to connect 4 physical 1 GB of a switch port 4500 for a dell with the team server.

  The thing that is not working, I tried to put the traffic with the iperf and never goes more than 1 GB

  All suggest? Thank you!

  the configuration below:

  interface GigabitEthernet6/38
  switchport access vlan 26
  active in mode channel-group 3
  spanning tree portfast
  end

  (ditto for the 4 ports)

  !

  Interface Port-canal3
  switchport
  switchport access vlan 26
  end

  !

  port-channel - the balance of the CBC - mac support
  Interface Port-canal3
  Interface Port-Channel 4
  active in mode channel-group 3
  active in mode channel-group 3
  active in mode channel-group 3
  active in mode channel-group 3

  !

  RO. CPD. CR # see the etherchannel 3 Summary
  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel
  I have - autonomous s - suspended
  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2
  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  M - don't use, minimum contacts not satisfied
  u - unfit to tied selling
  w waiting to be aggregated
  d default port

  Number of channels in use: 2
  Number of aggregators: 2

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group
  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
  3 Po3 (SU) LACP Gi6/38 (P) Gi7/12 (P) Gi7/45 (P)
  Gi7/46 (P)

  ro etherchannel load-balance. CPD. CR #Show
  Load balancing EtherChannel Configuration:
  CBC - mac

  EtherChannel load balancing address by protocol used:
  No - IP: Source MAC address
  IPv4: Source MAC address
  IPv6: Source MAC address

  How do you send the traffic? From a PC connected to Cat4500 or have iperf running on Dell Server?

  What happens if traffic beyond 1 G, it starts that drop packets? What kind of traffic drive you to iperf?

  See you soon,.

  -amit singh

• The error ether channel

  Hello

  Please find my ether below channel config

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 11-14

  switchport mode trunk

  no ip address

  ----------------------------------------

  interface FastEthernet0/2

  switchport mode trunk

  no ip address

  channel-group mode 1 on

  ----------------------------------

  interface FastEthernet0/9

  switchport mode trunk

  no ip address

  channel-group mode 1 on

  I am not able to see the port channel up

  out put is pasted below

  ---------------------

  SH s etherchannel

  Flags: D - low P - port-channel

  I have - autonomous s - suspended

  H Eve (LACP only)

  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2

  u - unfit to tied selling

  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  d default port

  Number of channels: 1

  Number of aggregators: 1

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group

  ------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------

  1 Po1 (SD) - Fa0 Fa0/2 (s) / 9 (s)

  SH etherchannel brie

  List of channel-group:

  -----------------------

  Group: 1

  ----------

  Group status = L2

  Ports: 2 Maxports = 8

  Port-channel: 1 Port Max-channels = 1

  Protocol: -.

  A01-KG-DMZ-1 #sh ISE

  A01-KG-DMZ-1 #sh ISE the

  A01-KG-DMZ-1 #sh etherchannel d

  List of channel-group:

  -----------------------

  Group: 1

  ----------

  Group status = L2

  Ports: 2 Maxports = 8

  Port-channel: 1 Port Max-channels = 1

  Protocol: -.

  Ports in the Group:

  -------------------

  Port: Fa0/2

  ------------

  Port State = Cnt - bndl suspends Up does not-in-Bndl

  Group of channels = 1 Mode = we / FEC Gcchange = -

  Port channel = null GC = - port-channel Pseudo = Po1

  Port index = 0 load = 0 x 00 Protocol =-

  Age of the port in the current state: 00d: 05 h: 56 m: 10s

  Probable reason: the mask of VLAN is different

  Port: Fa0/9

  Port State = Cnt - bndl suspends Up does not-in-Bndl

  Group of channels = 1 Mode = we / FEC Gcchange = -

  Port channel = null GC = - port-channel Pseudo = Po1

  Port index = 0 load = 0 x 00 Protocol =-

  Age of the port in the current state: 00d: 05 h: 56 m: 14s

  Probable reason: the mask of VLAN is different

  Port-channels of the Group:

  ----------------------

  Port-channel: Po1

  ------------

  Age of the Port-Channel = 00d: 03 h: 15:00

  Logical slot/port = 1/0 number of ports = 0

  GC = 0 x 00000000 HotStandBy port = null

  State of Port = Port-Channel Ag-non-Inuse

  Protocol =-

  Could one help to fix this isssue

  Regd

  Ilyas

  Ilyas,

  This is what I'm talking about.

  Them VLAN Trunking on the port-channel interface and the Member must match interfaces. If there is a mismatch, the status of the interfaces will be down

  Toshi