POSTURE of ISE Cisco + Client Provisioning - 2.1

Similar Questions

• Cisco ISE posture assessment and client provisioning

  Hello

  I have the Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I configured the RADIUS between these devices.

  Also, I configured RADIUSbetween ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to posture assessment for these devices (ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA or ISE Cisco Cisco IOS). Please give me the steps together for assesment for cisco ios device posture in Cisco ise.

  In addition, please give me related to posture assessment and the provisioning client logs.

  Thanks in advance.

  You can go through the list link below to download a PDF link

  Assessment of the posture with ISE.

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/CZ/expo2012/PDF/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.PDF

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Cisco ISE 802.1 X Client Provisioning

  Hello

  I have a customer requirement ISE provisioning for Windows and mac. I have the following configuration:

  1 2 SSID, comments and employees

  2. guest of free access

  3. employee is 802.1 x eap-peap (name of user and password)

  I was wondering if the client local administrator privilege is required for 802.1 x windows client provisioning? Consider me it necessary for MAC OS however not too sure if it may be required for Windows?

  Example employee a. connect the SSID and redirection to the web portal of comments. During his connection, they will be presented with the device registration portal. To be presented by the ISE on the wizard of supplication, they will be asked for administrator/local domain admin privilege install wizard begging package/supply agent successfully?

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Yes, you need admin rights to install agent

• Issue of Posture 1.3 Cisco ISE.

  Hi all

  Small issue: assessment of posture for ISE customer how you configure ISE to use several AV vendors?

  Example: I have configured ISE posture rating for Sophos AV definitions that works well, if I have introduced another provider of antivirus for the posture of the client assessment does not pass compliance because she's trying the two AV vendors? How do you ensure ISE verifies and marks as consistent customer for each suite AV?

  Clients use AnyConnect V4.

  Thanks in advance for any response.

  Actually, after checking I don't think you can use two terms consisting of the VA, in another State, so you will need to create it using both your requirements in the same requirements, and then select "any condition to succeed", only problem is that you can have as a repair action, which can be a problem.

• Is AnyConnect module - mandatory to install/configure all three VPN, NAM & Posture module ISE 1.3 for evaluation of posture

  Hi Experts,

  I installing Anyconnect point doubt:

  We want to go for web-deployment of head of network device that is ISE for the assessment of posture, however I came across the document where its mentioned the installation with the three modules:

  (1) VPN

  (2) NAM

  (3) module posture

  I am only concerned to posture to check on enterprise wireless users until I have to configure all of the modules in customer provisioning?

  There is no existing with Anyconnect client configuration. No ASA as n for my case. I have WLC acting as n.

  so after that customer gets auth 802.1 x, customer must redirect to posture help control Anyconnect. and its new deployment where the customer is not having this agent software.

  If please guide me with the right direction for Anyconnect deployment for single control of posture and how customers can get this downloaded automatically agent is my main concern.

  For assessment of posture, just deploy the "Module of Posture". The "NAM" module is used only when you want to replace the native Windows supplicant. The "VPN" module is used for anyconnect VPN.

  The posture can be hosted in the ISE and be put into service at the endpoints via a Client Provisioning rule. However, users must have the appropriate privilege to perform the installation of the package. In many organizations, users have NO such privileges. If this is your case, so you must deploy the Posture Module via GPO/System Center or another equivalent system.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cannot access a remote LAN with Cisco Client

  Hello

  IAM using an ASA 5505 and connect with the Cisco Client 5.0.02.0090. The Client connects to the Remote LAN and get an IP of the SAA.

  But I can't access the Remote LAN or ping the Interface of the ASA trainee.

  Can someone help me with this problem?

  If the client computer is in the same subnet as the other PC, then its dislikes a question ASA.

  Just make sure that the client computer is in the subnet, default gateway of 192.168.20.100 192.168.20./24 and connected to a switchport on vlan 1.

  Finally, check whether the DNS resolution works, or if you can browse the internet with the ip address.

• 12.3 2621/Cisco IOS and Cisco-Client 4.0.5B

  Hi people,

  I have a few questions about the Cisco Client software V4.0.5(B) jointly with our Cisco 2621 router. I finally made to access our network through a vpn tunnel (authentication group / ipsec over udp)

  Now to my problem:

  It seems that all outbound traffic through the tunnel. I can't specify a network range that the vpn gateway to be used? I still want to recover servers 'in the wild' POP3 messages or surf the Web while being connected to my network of the company. I can't believe customer Cisco is that stupid... so need me.

  Kind regards

  Chris

  Hello chris,

  You can do this... you must enable tunneling split on the router, using an access list... This allows traffic on the access list to go through the VPN tunnel... All other traffic is not put in the tunnel and started the local LAN...

  You must enable split tunneling on your router as follows:

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group abcgroup

  key cisco123

  DNS 1.1.1.1

  1.1.1.1 victories

  domain cisco.com

  pool ippool

  ACL 102

  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 (remote network) 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 (IP pool)

  In doing so, only for the 192.168.1.0/24 traffic is encrypted. all other traffic, such as POP3 and internet will be accessible from your LAN...

  I hope this helps...

  All the best...

• The ISE Cisco switch configuration

  Hi experts,

  I got the following network:

  Devices-> switch access-->--> access switch central office switch-> ISE Server

  All switches are capable IOS for the 802. 1 X and configurations of AAA for ISE to manage network devices. However, I read in the guide on the configuration of the switches in preparation for the deployment of the ISE of CIsco, but I wonder what should I configure switches for access and basic switches or only configure the switches for access to EHT?

  Thanks for your time to read!

  If all clients are non-DHCP clients, then no configuration is based or distribution at all.

  But you may need to search different options of profiling, if the customers are not active DHCP. Access switch supports the function of detection IOS? Would be very useful to have such a that it would send important profiling information at ISE. You may need to use the right options for ISE of profiling to determine the details of the endpoint.

  Concerning

  Vivek

• ISE Cisco authorization with device OS

  Hello

  We want to allow access only to devices with Windows operating system. I tried to an allow rule with the condition "Session: Windows operating system device is equal to ' but it does not work. If I try to connect with a Windows 7 client, access is denied and the log shows "15039 rejected by authorization profile. What could be the problem?

  We use the ISE with Version 1.1.3

  Thank you

  Marc

  There is no problem with version 1.1.3 ISE, you are is later. Maybe the probes are not configured correctly.

  Please check the help below link

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns744/docs/howto_30_ise_profiling.PDF

• Question ISE Cisco router certificate

  Hello

  I'm looking to get to the how to guides or examples of configuration on how ISE NHPS can be used as an intermediate CA (certification authority root in Enterprise Microsoft CA). Routers / Firewalls ASA automated certificate request to LSE which can issue the certificate as intermediate CA, purpose of these certificates to routers / firewall can use for configuration of the IPSec VPN.

  Thank you very much

  Rakesh

  Hello

  Here's the Cisco documentation:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/2-0/admin_guide/b_ise _...

  It's very simple to set as an intermediary ca ise. ISE will use CEP Protocol to distribute certificates. Wait paragraph ISE CA issues certificates user VPN ASA.

  In a few words, after importing CA root and when you enable ise as a ca server, you will generate a csr from ISE. generate Windows intermediate certificate for ISE from this REA. That generated while bound this certificate to CSR in ISE.

  That's all.

  Don't worry, the steps are described very well in the ISE.

  There is a great video, I always recommend to newbies, labminutes; who do an outstanding job: http://www.labminutes.com/sec0187_ise_13_internal_certificate_authority _...

  What you need to know, is that you will not be able to create specific model to the LSE, as you did on Windows.

  PS: If this solves your problem do not forget to note and correct mark them as answer

  Thank you

• Configs ISE Cisco switch

  I guess Cisco ISE sends a redirect to URL to the switch and switch, it presents to the customer in the case of access comments get a redirect URL with acceptance of the user (guests and not wired) Page.

  My question is, do we need to configure the server http and https on the switches (both pleading and authenticator)?

  I don't know that it will take a confirmation, but just wanted to...

  I checked the configuration for the supplicant and authenticator of ISE switches, and there no where not mentioned this part of the config.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.0/user_guide/ise10_troubleshooting.html (a redirect to URL and possible cause problem is mentioned) - make sure that the config is necessary.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst2960x/software/15-0_2_EX/security/configuration_guide/b_sec_152ex_2960-x_cg/b_sec_152ex_2960-x_cg_chapter_010000.html

  (the begging and authenticator switch configuration) - mentioned anywhere in the configuration of http/https for the two switches.

  Yes, his need.  The http/s server in the swtich is used to retrieve the user http traffic and redirect the traffic to the CWA portal, or a registration portal device or even for the portal of integrated Mobile Device Management (MDM).  .

  IP http server

  IP http secure server

  The info below, I caught Cisco ISE for BYOD and book secure access unified.

  "Organization many want if ensure that this referral process to aid internal HTTP Server switch is dissociated from the management of the switch itself, in order to limit the risk of the user interacts with the intervace plan a switch of control and management."  This can be accomplished by connecting the two following commands in global configuration mode:

  active session modules IP http no

  "IP http secure-active-session-modules no".

• ISE Cisco 3395 NIC Teaming/redundancy

  Is it possible to implement the consolidation of NETWORK cards on a 3395, I see that it is available on the SNS 3400 series? However, I was unable to locate any information about NIC grouping for purposes of redundancy on of the 3395. This feature is taken in charge, and if so, how I would approach him allowing of correctly? Thank you very much for the help in advance.

  Hello. For now, ISE does not support the NIC teaming/pipe of any kind. It asked that several times so I hope that Cisco will implement in a future version.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Redirect ISE Cisco - CWA

  Why are the ISE nodes should be set to redirect acl web authentication configured locally on the switch?

  All of the documentation I found suggests. I install my old ISE environment 2 years in this way and was informed at the beginning to do. But after thinking, the whole authentication process through and then test my theories, I don't understand why the ISE nodes must be defined in switch redirect acl. I am testing now with a simple acl "redirect www & 443", and it does not work as expected.

  The client connects to the network, and for our environment, it is asked to dot1x until it expires and then she moves to mab. How, I don't have an authz rules defined for my test machine and so is my Tote authz rule of CWA that sends a DACL CWA. The switch sets the ACLs on the interface in the following order: 1. 2 redirect. DACL 3. PACL. In my list DACL, I have access to the ISE nodes allowed (just to be sure) and the redirect still works because my test machine doesn't send any traffic www/443 to lymph ISE I know (CWA is 8443).

  Someone can explain (in detail) why a client machine would send www/443 traffic to the nodes of the ISE and must therefore be defined in the local redirect CWA acl to the switch.

  In fact, the dACL will replace the ACL/PACL preauthentication you configured on the switchport. Traffic should be allowed first via the DACL, then she will hit redirect the ACL.

• Using Cisco Client to site VPN on a behind a NAT ASA 5520

  I apologize if this has been asked and we answered in the forums.  I looked, and while I found a large number of entries that were dancing all around this question, I never found nothing which addressed this specific issue.   We currently use an ASA 5520 as the head end of a relatively large customer to site IPSEC VPN (approximately 240 users, not consecutively).   This ASA is currently sitting behind a Checkpoint firewall with a real publicly addressable IP address on its public interface.  All of our customers use the legacy Cisco VPN (not the one anyconnect) client.  We plan to a few controllers F5 link set up between ISPS and firewalls.   For VPN connectivity F5 recommends that we NAT IP address (called a broad IP) to point back to a private IP address on the ASA and F5.  My question is, will this work?   I've always heard say that the head of line needed to have a public IP address on this subject because this is what will be placed in packages for the client to respond to.

  For further information, here's what we have now and what we are invited to attend.

  Current

  ISP - router - firewall-fire - ASA (public IP address as endpoint)

  Proposed

  ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - Firewall - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

  Proposed alternative

  ISP - router - F5 (public IP address as endpoint using a NAT to ASA) - ASA (10.X.X.X as its external interface)

  All thoughts at this moment would be greatly appreciated.   Thank you!

  Hello

  If there is a static NAT one by one on F5 to the external interface of the ASA, then I don't think they would be any problems.
  Because when the client will attempt to connect to IKE to the translated public IP, F5 will redirect the request to ASA outside interface that is configured for the VPN.

  In addition, to ensure the udp500, 4500 and esp is allowed and then you should be good to go.

  HTH

  Concerning
  Mohit

• Upgrading ise Cisco and licenses

  I nedd upgrade of version 1.1.2 patch 4 to 1.1.3

  the deployment is distributed so that the shared deployment technique should be used:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1.1/upgrade_guide/upg_dis_dep.html#wp1052969

  the guide is quite difficult to follow as there are has some missing licenses information that can potentially cause downs of service:

  in particular my questions reguarding the guide are:

  -OUR license is registered on the primary node of PAN only-

  (1) main node of PSN deregistration "D": that it will use the license? the inherited (10000 points of termination) or if he loses the license completely and lock the network authentication?

  (2) when the node "B" will be struck out and will become autonomous what happens to its licence? It will be lost? and what will happen to the "D" node when added to node "B"?

  (3) when I move back node "A" (after the upgrade and the record to the node "B") to the previous state of primary PAN, it is said that the license must be reloaded in it was lost when adding it to the node "B"... and in the meantime? No node will not authenticate because the primary node is unlicensed?

  TY

  Giuliano,

  De-registered node will always use its own license, that is, it becomes autonomous box without knowledge or information about anything around her. Assessment or any license you provided with.

  Of license is made by admin active cluster node, depending on its license.

  Take a look on:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId= CSCug04405

  I do not think that license needs to be recharged, but maybe it's just my memory doesn't serve me. I'll check that one again.

  M.