PowerConnect6248 and Tunel VPN

Similar Questions

• Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients on a single PC

  Hello

  I'm in the following fix:

  I had used customer Checkpoint SecuRemote 4.1 SP - 5 VPN in the past.

  Now, I have installed the Cisco VPN client version 4.0.4 on my PC to access IPSec VPN for the PIX in our headquarters.

  According to Cisco VPN release notes http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/vpn/client/rel404/404clnt.htm#wp1346340 , it should be possible to have clients both Cisco and Checkpoint VPN installed on the same machine.

  But I am not able to connect to my PIX, I receive the following error message:

  "Secure the complete VPN connection locally by the Client.

  Reason 403: failed to contact the security gateway. »

  When I'm looking for signs of PC control-> system-> hardware-> device Administration-> network cards, I can see Cisco Systems VPN Adapter disabled.

  After you activate manually, I always get the same error when you try to connect to the Cisco VPN client.

  After PC restart the Cisco VPN adapter is disabled later.

  I tried to uncheck Check Point SecuRemote form my Dial-up connection (bypassing CSCea31192 of bug, but the bug does not affect NAT - T connection which I use).

  I noticed the same situation on three different computers, one running Windows XP, both running Windows 2000.

  After uninstalling the client Checkpoint completely (including Windows registry manual removal), the Cisco VPN client works very well.

  It seems to me, therefore, that there is a profound mismatch between Cisco and Checkpoint VPN clients.

  Does anyone know of a workaround?

  Thank you

  Milan

  We had the same problem with some of our users who need to use the two clients to connect to customer sites.

  If I remember the cisco client does not start automatically, but the client of checkpoint 4.1 don't.

  We by-passed by deleting the registry entry point control that starts the client at startup. fwenc.exe is the entrance and it is in

  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

  After that make a shortcut to the executable file that is stored in the directory \bin to relevant checkpoint on the client (it is different from NT & 9 client x) and then only start when it is necessary.

  Hope that's a help

• Site2Site and remote VPN

  I have a site2site between PIX506 and 877 router VPN. Site A has PIX506 and Site B router a in 877. I configured site2site VPN and it worked fine. I also configured remote VPN on PIX 506 so that the remote user can access A site. But when I configure remote VPN on PIX506 site2site VPN works and both sides can ping each other. But site B users cannot access any resource network or application of the SiteA while site A can access resources of site B. After removing remote VPN site configuration B can access the resources of the Site I joined the configuration of the two sites. Someone help me please site2site and remote VPN work at the same time.

  Please forgive me for not reading every line.

  an add-on quick about the pix configuration:

  change "isakmp key * address 213.181.169.8 netmask 255.255.255.255" at "isakmp key * address 213.181.169.8 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth No. config-mode.

• ASR1K and SSL VPN

  I'm having trouble finding information on SSL VPN for ASR1K, when we bought the boxes told us that SSL VPN was on the roadmap of the software, but that was back in 2010 and now I can not find anything nor can I get the right information.

  Does anyone have a recommendation on what to do or who to ask?

  PLS, contact your Cisco account manager as he or she would be able to provide additional information.

  There is normally a long list of features to add to the product, and SSL VPN is one of them who was asked to appear on the ASR. However, depending on the needs, it might be on the top of the list of the road map, or to the bottom of the list. Your Cisco AM should be able to get information from the product team.

• WebVPN and remote VPN access

  Hello

  Is there a difference between WebVPN and remote VPN access or they are the same.

  Thank you.

  access remote vpn consists of

  -IPSEC VPN remote access. It is part of the ASA, no permit required, requires pre-installed Client from Cisco VPN IPSEC on PC

  -with AnyConnect SSL VPN remote access. It requires licensing of SSL VPN on SAA. AnyConnect client can be installed automatically on the PC with the launch of web.

  -with Essentials AnyConnect SSL VPN remote access. Beginning with ASA 8.2 (1), almost license $ 0. It's the same AnyConnect client as in the previous article, but it cannot be installed automatically with the launch of web. It must be previously installed as of Cisco IPSEC VPN client.

  -webvpn aka clientless vpn. It is a portal HTTPS which allows HTTP connections, file sharing, telnet, RDP and much more (with smart tunnels) resources without having to install a real client on the PC. It requires licensing of SSL VPN on SAA. It cannot be used if "AnyConnect Essentials" license is activated on SAA after 8.2 (1)

  Kind regards

  Roman

• PIX and ASA static, dynamic and RA VPN does not

  Hello

  I am facing a very interesting problem between a PIX 515 and an ASA 5510.

  The PIX is in HQ and has several dynamic VPN connections (around 130) and IPsec vpn remote works very well. I had to add a PIX to ASA L2L VPN static and it does not work as it is supposed to be. The ASA 5510, at the remote end, connects and rest for a small period of time, however, all other VPN connections stop working.

  The most interesting thing is that ASA is associated with the dynamic map and not the static map that I created (check by sh crypto ipsec his counterpart x.x.x.x). However, if I make any changes in the ACL 'ACL-Remote' it affects the tunnel between the PIX and ASA.

  Someone saw something like that?

  Here is more detailed information:

  HQ - IOS 8.0 (3) - PIX 515

  ASA 5510 - IOS 7.2 (3) - remote provider

  Several Huawei and Cisco routers dynamically connected via ADSL

  Several users remote access IPsec

  A VPN site-to site static between PIX and ASA - does not.

  Here is the config on the PIX:

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

  Dyn - VPN game 100 Dynamics-card crypto transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec

  Crypto dynamic-map Dyn - VPN 100 the value reverse-road

  VPN - card 30 crypto card matches the ACL address / remote

  card crypto VPN-card 30 peers set 20 x. XX. XX. XX

  card crypto VPN-card 30 the transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec value

  VPN crypto card - 100 - isakmp dynamic Dyn - VPN ipsec

  interface card crypto VPN-card outside

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  crypto ISAKMP policy 65535

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  access list ACL-remote ext ip 10.0.0.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Thank you.

  Marcelo Pinheiro

  The problem is that the ASA has a crypto acl defined between host and network, while the remote end has to the network.

  Make sure that the acl is reversed.

• WebVPN and remote vpn, ssl vpn anyconnect

  Hi all

  Differences between webvpn and remote vpn, ssl vpn anyconnect
  All require a separate license?

  Thank you

  Hello

  The difference between the webvpn and SSL VPN Client is the WebVPN to use SSL/TLS and port

  send through a java application to support the application, it also only supports TCP for unicast traffic, no ip address

  address is assigned to the customer, and the navigation on the web in the tunnel is made with a SSL

  Web-mangle that allows us stuff things in theSSL session.

  SSL VPN (Anyconnect) Client is a client of complete tunneling using SSL/TCP, which installs an application on the computer and

  envelopes vpn traffic in the ssl session and thus also an assigned ip address has the

  tunnel's two-way, not one-way.   It allows for the support of the application on the

  tunnel without having to configure a port forward for each application.

  AnyConnect is a client of new generation, which has replaced the old vpn client and can be used as long as the IPSEC vpn ssl.

  For anyconnect licenses please see the link below:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/vpn_client/AnyConnect/ANYC...

  Kind regards

  Kanwal

• VPN between a PIX and a VPN 3000

  I'm trying to set up a VPN between PIX and a VPN 3000. All configurations are complete, but the tunnel has not been established. On the PIX, to 'see the crypto engine' and ' show isakmp his ' orders, I do not see the tunnel. Of "show ipsec his ' command, I can see the mistakes"#send"continues to increase when I try to connect to the remote network. Here is the copy - paste command:

  Tag crypto map: myvpnmap, local addr. 10.70.24.2

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.70.24.128/255.255.255.128/0/0)

  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.96.0.0/255.224.0.0/0/0)

  current_peer: 10.70.16.5:0

  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts 0 digest

  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check 0

  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed:

  #send 12, #recv errors 0

  local crypto endpt. : 10.70.24.2, remote Start crypto. : 10.70.16.5

  Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 0, media, mtu 1500

  current outbound SPI: 0

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  Obviously, the PIX identifies protected traffic but failed to establish the tunnel. I was wondering what could be the reason for these kind of mistakes? That means them growing '#send errors?

  Thank you very much!

  Sending error mean simply the PIX is grateful to encrypt this traffic, but there is no built tunnel and so it must drop the package.

  you will need to look at why the tunnel is not under construction however, "sending error" are just a byproduct of some other configuration issue. On the PIX, it looks like you would have something like:

  Crypto ip 10.70.24.128 access list allow 255.255.255.128 10.96.0.0 255.224.0.0

  On the 3000 under the L2L section and the Local and remote network, you need the exact opposite of the latter, then it would be:

  / Local network mask = 10.96.0.0/0.31.255.255

  / Remote network mask = 10.70.24.128/0.0.0.127

  If you have something else the tunnel will fail to come. Otherwise, we see that the Cryptography debugs the PIX and the trunk of the 3000 when the tunnel is built.

• PIX - PIX VPN and Client VPN - cannot access core network

  I hub and spoke PIX and a VPN Client that connects to speak it PIX, much the same as the example configuration here: -.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00800948b8.shtml

  This example shows the client VPN access to the network behind PIX RADIUS. I want the client to also be able to access the central network, i.e. the client connects to the pix speaks via vpn, and traffic is routed through the vpn to PIX - PIX to the central site.

  How this would change the configuration contained in the example?

  See you soon,.

  Jon

  You can not do this, the PIX cannot route a package back on the same interface, it is entered in the. The only way to do that is to have the client connect to the hub PIX, but then they would not be able to get to the network behind PIX distance either.

  Or that the customer would connect on a different interface in the PIX of distance, but this would mean another connection ISP on this PIX. Example of config is here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/client-pixhub.html

• ASA5505: Configure the ASA for IPSec and SSL VPN?

  Hello-

  I currently have my 5505 for SSL AnyConnect VPN connections Setup.  Is it possible to set up also the 5505 for IPSec VPN connections?

  So, basically my ASA will be able to perform SSL and IPSec VPN tunnels, at the same time.

  Thank you!

  Kim,

  Yes, you can configure your ASA to support the AnyConnect VPN IPSec connections and at the same time.  In short, for the configuration of IPSec, you should configure at least a strategy ISAKMP, a set of IPSEC, encryption, tunnel group card processing and associated group policy.

  Matt

• AnyConnect and SSL - VPN without client

  Are there problems in running Cisco AnyConnect and SSL - VPN without client side by side?

  I am currently looking into adding features for an ASA AnyConnect who currently set up to operate without SSL - VPN client. The system without client is not removed. I don't know how to set it up, I wonder if someone has already set up this or if there is no problem with this Setup?

  Hi Daniel

  It's a little complicated if you want a granular authentication and authorization, but it works.

  I'm running an ASA with IPSec, SSL Client and clientless SSL.

  Each of these virtual private networks with user/one-time-password name and certificate based authentic.

  The main challenge is to put in place its own structure of profile cards, connection profiles, group policies and dynamic access policies.

  Feel free to ask questions...

  Stephan

• Windows IPSEC and SSL VPN client on the same machine

  Matches (coexistence) installation of IPSEC and SSL vpn clients that are supported on the same computer, windows (XP and Win7)?

  As mentioned by Patricia and Jennifer (5 stars), you can install two clients on the same machine without any problem.

  The tricky part comes when you are trying to connect two clients at the same time, that's when you may encounter unexpected problems.

  However, if your intention is to install both clients and connect them individually and not at the same time, you'll be fine.

  If you have any other questions, please mark this question as answered and note all messages that you have found useful.

  Thank you.

  Portu.

  Post edited by: Javier Portuguez

• RT for Windows and Cisco VPN (AnyConnect) Solutions?

  Microsoft and Cisco are working together to ensure Cisco VPN is soon available for Windows RT?  I read a thread RT of Windows from Microsoft and Cisco VPN without seeing all the comments of Microsoft or Cisco.  Please notify.

  Hi Gabriel,

  The Microsoft Answers community focuses on the context of use. Please reach out to the business community of COMPUTING in the TechNet forum below:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories

• Kernel panic reproducible when using VMWare Fusion and Cisco VPN

  I can reliable reproduce a kernel panic when I use VMWare Fusion and Cisco VPN set.

  Using either done alone causes no problem.

  I'm on a mac book pro using the latest updates from Apple for Leopard.

  My question is: How can I report this to VMWare without having to pay for support?

  When I go to the VMWare fusion support page he wants me to pay for an incident.

  I really do not want to pay them to help solve a kernel panic.  (They pay me .)

  Announcing the details here (don't forget to join the panic.log as in HOWTO: ask (and answer) Questions) will work.

• SPA2102 and business VPN

  I have a problem to connect to my VPN ATT customer.  My configuration--> Modem cable--> SPA2102 Linksys WRT54G-->--> computer.  My phone is plugged into the SPA2102 and computer WRT54G.  I don't lose internet connection or IP phone but intermintently lose the VPN connection causing to reconnect me every so often.  I removed the WRT54G Router and connected to the SPA2102 directly, same problem.  I removed the SPA2102 and connected directly to the cable modem, no problem, never lose the connection.  What configuration is required to enable a compatible VPN connection?  I opened the ports 500 and 4500 on the SPA2102 for UDP and TCP and still lose the connection.  My ATT journal has these entries DISCONNECTED UNEXPECTEDLY AFTER hh: mm ERROR 119.  All devices are configured to use the DHCP protocol. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Open the following ports on the spa2102, 47-1723-50-500 and test again if the same problem will happen again. is it possible to use the static ip address instead?