PP 2015.3 no CUDA mercury?

Similar Questions

• Nvidia card must be connected to CUDA Mercury acceleration?

  Before I go spend a bunch more money on display cards...

  Let's supposed I had an ATI 5870 driving 3 monitors... and I also had a 4000 Quardo installed... but connected to the monitors of no....

  First always see and use the 4000 CUDA cores to accelerate the performance of first?

  Briefing note 1

  I had already enough degradation of performance and hassle trying to run a 4870 + GT120... so I will try to avoid mixing the brand cards different monitors in 1 line system

  Briefing note 2

  I'm on a full charge MacPro Nehalem 2009

  No, Yes. There is no need to connect monitors to use the Quadro 4000 card. It requires however correct installation of the operating system.

  If you ask a question next time, do it in a clear and understandable way.

  Nvidia card must be connected to CUDA Mercury acceleration?

  N ° it must be installed, but not need to connect to monitors.

  First always see and use the 4000 CUDA cores to accelerate the performance of first?

  Yes. If properly implemented.

  Try to avoid the conflicting issues and create confusion.

• CUDA Mercury playback engine in Premiere Pro CS6 but not show in first Pro CC. Why is this?

  G ' Day of the Australia again.

  I've been using Premiere Pro CS6, and during this time the Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration of the reduction (CUDA) appears as an option for the rendering engine.

  But now that I've updated for first Pro CC, the rendering engine does not appear, only the Mercury Playback Engine software.

  My computer is

  Windows 7 Professional

  Service Pack 1

  Processor Intel R COre TMi7

  24 GB RAM

  64-bit operating system

  Graphics card

  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

  Could someone help me please get the CUDA converter to appear with first Pro CC.

  Thanks a lot for your help.

  The following text appears when I run the Premiere Pro Cs6

  

  Adobe switched to a DLL that universally supports all GPU 'qualified '.  You upgrade the drivers for that?

• CUDA / Mercury may not be used

  Nice day

  Current running Win7 64 - bit on a Six-Core Athlon 3.2 ghz, 8 GB of ram. Last 257,21 64-bit nvidia drivers as well.

  I picked up a GTX285 to speed up exports and the first time I exported, it took an export of 10 minutes down to a little more than 30 seconds with CPU No. load that I could see.

  Now, however, seems that CS5 Premiere Pro does not use the Mercury engine for export as it is returning for exports CPU only...

  Is it possible to force it to use the Mercury engine?

  Just tested again using TechPowerUp GPU - Z that indicates the GPU load.

  In Photoshop, it shows the unloading for the GPU, but in Premiere Pro, brushes without load GPU while editing, play or export!

  I checked in the project settings to make sure that it is on the GPU of mercury affecting as well...

  Fine thanks

  I think this injury means that the maximum error tolerated speed up encoding.  Only, it speeds up the rendering of effects so that the resulting images can be encoded export format/codec.  However, the accelerated rendering would probably be enough to explain the difference in speed, you saw.

  MPE does not accelerate the decoding or encoding of video; It is still the work of the processor.

  -Jeff

• First 2015.4 is not using CUDA when H.264 rendering

  I use 2015.4 first on Windows 10 64-bit (current as of this date patches) on an i5 - 3570 K/32 GB with an EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti SSC 2 GB with driver rev 372.70 (current).  When I visited a project in the format H.264 first DO NOT use my CUDA cores.  When I visited the same project format MOV first FACT use my CUDA cores.  I have all the settings of export to their default values.  In preferences-> media, Enable accelerated Intel decoding h.264 is turned on.  In the project settings, Renderer is set for the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA).  I can't find other settings that look like they could cause this.

  Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong?  Or first just not support the GPU acceleration when rendering H.264?

  All use CUDA... read this

  creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

• The GPU CUDA acceleration stops working PP CC 2015.0.1

  Hello

  I encountered a small problem with the GPU CUDA acceleration.  I've been running an EVGA GTX 570 for quite awhile.  I've relied on the GPU acceleration a bit for a smoother workflow, and recently he has virtually stopped working.  I'll drop a few clips in the timeline panel and apply color effects.  Usually, I can play for a few seconds and skip a few different points in the timeline panel, but once more the program monitor's going to be just black.  I get no error message and I can still hear the audio.  First restart will fix the problem temporarily, until it happens again.  I've resorted to just disable GPU acceleration using just the Mercury Playback Engine only, which solves the problem, but it is really too slow to work with.

  This only seems to happen in After Effects at all.  I started having this problem after one of the subsequent updates of 2015.

  I tried to update my graphics drivers, but it did not help.  Any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

  Computer: Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit, Intel Core i7 3930 K, 32 GB RAM, GeForce GTX 570 (pilot 340.52), EVGA ASUS p9X79 Pro, 238 GB SSD

  Here's why, Neil:

  Version of the ability to calculate CUDA.

  You see, Premiere Pro CC 2015 now requires CUDA compute capability version 3.0 or superior for accelerating GPU of MEPS able to work at all. Unfortunately, GTX 570 your system's Fermi architecture more compute capacity is old, including the CUDA version only 2.x (in the case of the GTX 570, version CUDA compute capacity is only 2.0). In other words, the GPU in your PC is now too old to be properly supported in 2015 of CC. The latest version of first Pro CC to support properly such an older GPU was CC, 2014.

• Updated from CC to CC 2015 2014 now unknown error compiling movie in SOUL

  I'm editing a project that is 720 x 576 only so no HD in question.  My PC is running Windows 10.

  I used 2014 CC and had no problem to export the project.

  I just upgraded today to CC 2015.

  Now, it is true that, after making a few changes to the project, I get the dreaded unknown error message.

  I read a lot of comments on the forums about this and what seems to be a multitude of things to look at to fix the problem.

  I did not much yet to investigate and make, but for the life of me I don't understand why the software can at least give an idea where to start.

  One solution supposed to remove the clips one at a time to determine where is the problem.

  My project has hundreds of clips, so it could take some time.

  I'm happy that I'm only using the software for a hobby rather than for a living if not I would be hot.

  Maybe someone could explain why the software can't give a clue where in the video, the error is.  Surely, he must know where is the problem. He might not know what is causing the error, but a clue as to where to look would help to solve the problem.  It seems that this error has existed for a long time, and you would have thought that adobe would have found a way now to reach a judicious system of error reporting.

  Thanks for your suggestion.

  Fortunately, I just tried the first test:

  Change the video rendering and playback the playback (Cuda) Mercury to Mercury Playback Engine software only engine

  He deleted the files of rendering.

  Then, I just did an export throughout the sequence.  Almost all of the existing sequence in the timeline showed in red that I guess that means that a majority of it is not rendered.

  The export worked perfectly without error.

• Compatibility with video cards CC 2015

  PNY XLR8 GeForce® GTX 980 with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory for compatibility with CC 2015 what?  I don't see it in the list of video cards.

  Any card with a device compatible-current of the vendor driver should work just fine

  Are you talking about a specific program, such as Premiere Pro?

  creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

• CUDA - how much does Adobe use it for real in 2016 CC?

  Hey guys,.

  Working on a new configuration and I'm not for installation of Nvidia. Because Nvidia is Cuda and OpenCL. But, everywhere I open or join a discussion on ATI vs Nvidia, I get information can't confirm anywhere.

  Some claim that Cuda is end of line in Adobe. Is this true?

  Anyway, what parts are Cuda?

  In Photoshop - so far, I know, 30 + filters are made by Cuda. But its all a bit fuzzy what part is made by OpenCL and what part is done by Cuda. NVIDIA is not clear about this, and Adobe is not clear.

  In the first - up ik now, it renders the video much more quickly than in OpenCL. Not sure, I can't delete it.

  Is a Nvidia installer in 2016 always the task of sweat to work daily in Adobe?

  The link you posted on CUDA seems to be fixed: http://blogs.adobe.com/creativecloud/cuda-mercury-playback-engine-and-adobe-premiere-pro/

• Graphics card to enable the Mercury playback engine

  I work with first as part of the CS5 for a few years with good results but wants to speed up the Assembly.

  I tried to add my card to the list within Adobe programming to enable the mercury playback speed but no go.

  My card is ATI Radeon HD 5400.

  Y at - it someone could recommend to replace the Radeon which first would automatically use a card?

  The system is:

  Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q 8200 @ 2.33 ghz

  4 GB of ram

  64-bit operating system

  Thanks much for the tips

  Norman

  Must be NVidia for CS5

  creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

  If your nVidia card at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a file "supported cards.

  For your computer, don't spend much, go to the Page Tweakers and find the article on a balanced system

• Missing Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration after computer crash. How can I get it back

  Hi, I am missing the Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration after computer crash. How can I get it back?  I got my husband to update my graphics driver.  How what should I do?  When I check the project settings > general, he still has the field of software reading Mercuy only in gray.

  Adobe Premiere CC CC 2014 CS6 CS5.5 CS5 video cards with CUDA Mercury Playback unlock MPE Hack David Knarr

• Rendering of Adobe first Cuda

  I really have the problem that I can not restore with cuda...

  My system: 2 x Gigabty GeForce GTX 670 OC 2 GB. I7 3770 k. 12 GB of RAM. Windows 7 64 bit

  If I chose the reading Mercury - GPU (CUDA) acceleration engine and I try to export the video my CPU runs at 90% and my GPU is still @ 0%...

  I tried to google. without success... can someone please help me?

  All use CUDA... creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

• Engine reading Mercury and NVIDIA cards

  I assumed that this has been discussed in the past, but my research turned up empty.

  I run CS4 body for a while but am upgrading to 5.5 organization and I also want to go ATI to NVIDIA to get CUDA mercury reading improving.

  I'm glad I checked that I discovered that only a very few cards consumer (no Quadro) is listed.

• GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
• GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
• GeForce GTX 570 (Windows)
• GeForce GTX 580 (Windows)

I want to go with the consumer line because my PC is also used for other things and is not a PC edition devoted.

If it's true that these are the only ones that work?  Or is that a lot of PC of areas where things work (such as memory and motherboards), but not everyone is put to the test...

I saw a site where it said that you had to hack a file or something in order to get other cards NVIDIA Cuda to work in the mercury with Pr Pro mode even if they were equal to or greater in power than these...

Thanks for the help,

BJBBJB1

I guess the question is if you think Adobe is likely to reduce the number of cards taken in charge or he hard code in the program.  Personally, I think CS6(+?) could fully support CUDA cards.

FWIW, I just do the hack with my GTX 560 Ti card and it worked.  I'm running the PPBM right now.  Unfortunately, my AMD Opteron 165 system based, RAM DDR (not number) based has a LARGE number of bottlenecks that kill performance, BUT it's much better with the 560 card than without!

The previous card, I had was an ATI Radeon X1950XTX.  However, I gave up on them after that they don't provide for her drivers for Win7.  Yes, the Vista 64 drivers worked, but without support, I have a quite expensive anchor point.  IMO, Nvidia, however, is much better than ATI in driver support.  So I will stay with them for a while.  Just my experience, though.  Hey, I have a few old 6600GT cards and Nvidia has drivers for Win7 64-bit available.  And it's an old card.  In any case...

The GTX 570 should provide more than enough power for the current iterations of first.  ATI provides an 'equivalent' (OpenCL), but Adobe, for some reason, is not support.

I hear you on Adobe supporting a larger number of CUDA cards.  I know that CUDA programmers and they tell me that the code is not limited by the cards.  You call the driver/CUDA features card and it works.  So I'm at a loss to understand that.  It simply limits their customer satisfaction.  It is not like they are not big enough to test.

FWIW, the GTX 560 it seems to work well with CS5 and I guess would work well with CS5.5.

Good luck in your adventures.  As I buy the additional hardware, I'll try to update here.

Scott

• Clarification of the taken video cards supported for 15,3

  Hey,.

  The link, below the article said that with version 15.3 Adobes has stopped supporting the old Nvidia graphics cards. Is this true?

  Cards video for Adobe Premiere CC 2015 CUDA Mercury Playback David Knarr

  I can't find any information office in this forum confiriming information above.

  So for example GTX 570 still will support CUDA acceleration with 15.3 and leave?

  1. Yes and no. depends on the card. will not work GTX 285 and gtx 480 will be for example (has to do with some sort of version of the software on the card?)

  2. I have a gtx 480 and still gives me cuda on 2015.4.

  3. you need not buy new maps of the IMO.

  Have you tried 2015.3 on your system?

• SOUL of slow encoding

  Hello Adobe community.

  We are a small company in California of the South capture 8mm film in a JPEG sequence and returning it to customers in a full movie 1080 p.

  Our biggest problem is to end that we can capture up to 4,000 feet of film on a daily basis, but only make 1200 ft. This is equivalent to about 240 minutes of capture with only 72 minutes of the product. Our process of capturing the movie on an external drive, to which animate our computer edition (I'll include the specifications below) and then in rendering on the computer editing and modifying. Our edition is very simple. We use: 8mm settings; Quick Color Correction v4 and reduce grain. Our average amount of grain per clip is 18-26. When we export the clip to the SOUL, we averaged about 30 minutes of rendered by each sequence of 3 minutes. We simply can not work at these speeds so you need to be a way to accelerate our process of encoder with internal changes to the computer or changes to how we edit the film. We cannot lose the grain reduction but we could stay to do not the color correction. Any comments will be greatly appreciated.

  Change in the specifications of the computer

  RAM: 16GB Corsair vengeance

  CPU: i7 3770 3.44 GHz

  GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

  Sebastian Ross

  [email protected]

  Hi Sebastian,.

  Adobe does not list all compatible cards, but the 660 GTX has the basics of working with Adobe. What version of Adobe apps do you use? With legacy applications, there was a 'hack' to make unlisted maps to work. With CC 2015, any card with minimum requirements should be used automatically. More information here - Adobe Premiere CC CC 2015 2014 CC CS5.5 CS5 CS6 graphics cards with CUDA Mercury Playback unlock Hack David Knarr MPE

  With respect to the workflow, I found 'Remove the Grain' in 2015 of the AE. Was not already familiar with this effect, perhaps it's more recent? I use Red Giant Denoiser II on my system and have in the past also tried the trial ordered video Denoiser. I know that the red giant uses acceleration GPU, not sure that all neat. Maybe one of them would be faster? In any case, I can tell you this video denoiser is incredibly intensive treatment and always time consuming. An HD picture has millions of pixels and denoising works by comparing each of these pixels pixels in the adjacent images (before and after) to determine what belongs and what is the 'noise' and then the averages/smooth results. Many calculation!

  When you use an effect that is accelerated by GPU, then yes a bigger video card can help. The 660 GTX is on the lower end of the performance scale and perhaps a few years now, so a larger more recent map might help. As a GTX 970 or 980, if you have an adequate food and room for her.

  Workflow - so you can feed thousands of JPEG files by SOUL and then during the treatment of noise reduction? I wonder if a video clip would treat any faster than all the individual stills? In other words, convert the sequence again video clip, then treat. The conversion will take almost no time at all. Worth a try for a short excerpt. Open the sequence still in first or SOUL, and export as an .avi file.

  I heard that the Cineform codec is perhaps included in CC2015? I installed 2014 and don't see it. Otherwise, the Lagarith codec is lossless and free, download here - Lagarith Lossless Video Codec , but everything you do not export as "uncompressed" because it will be a huge file!

  Good luck

  Thank you

  Jeff Pulera

  Safe Harbor computers