PPTP on a stick VPN cisco 2600

Similar Questions

• PPTP VPN Cisco IOS router through

  Hi all

  I was wondering if there is a trick to get PPTP to work through a Cisco router.  He was in fact at some point, but I don't remember what has been changed over time... However, it no longer works.

  Current configuration includes:

  * CBAC applied inbound and outbound on the Internet interface (I needed to add incoming to fix a problem with the mode passive FTP doesn't work is not on a FTP server hosted behind this router)

  * CBAC inspects, among other things, PPTP

  * ACL applied inbound on interface Internet, GRE and TCP 1723 admitted any intellectual property

  * No other ACL on the router

  * IOS 15.0 (1)

  * Inbound configuration NAT for TCP 1723 (currently using the WAN IP address)

  One thing I saw was so Troubleshooting "IKE Dispatcher: IKEv2 version detected 2, Dropping package! - but I think that it is a wrong journal (router as the Cisco VPN configuration example).

  The server is definitely okay - we are able to connect over PPTP VPN from the local network to the server.  So I think it's a sort of NAT problem, because I don't see anything dropped by the firewall.

  Anyone able to point me in the right direction?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Thanks for fix the "sh run". Could you change the following:

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.77.99.11 1723 1723 road-map repeating sheep ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc

  to do this:

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.77.99.11 1723 1723 extensible ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc

  It would be prudent to proceed with this change in the removal of the map of the route if no one connects to the server via the PPTP VPN.

  Let me know.

  Kind regards

  ANU

  P.S. Please mark this question as answered if it was resolved. Note the useful messages. Thank you!

• Cisco 2600 router as an IPSec client

  Hello

  Currently I use a Cisco VPN client software to connect to a remote server for IPSec on the workstations.

  I want to set up the IPSec client on Cisco 2600 router that connects to the remote server IPSec so that workstations can access subnet VPN without using VPN software.

  Can someone guide me on how to configure the IPSec client on the router?

  Thank you

  Hi Adam,.

  Sorry for my late reply, I'm a little sick.

  I have checked the logs and did small repro. For me, it seems that the server does not support NEM:

  It is disabled with NEM VPN server:

  Nov 30 00:13:56 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = gsa3mle3, name of user = cisco, IP = 10.10.10.2, MODE_CFG: request received for the DHCP for DDNS hostname is: R1!

  Nov 30 00:13:56 [IKEv1]: Group = gsa3mle3 username = cisco, IP = 10.10.10.2, material Connection Client rejected!  Network Extension mode is not allowed for this group!

  The customer:

  * 1 Mar 00:45:56.387: ISAKMP: (1007): lot of 10.10.10.13 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) CONF_ADDR

  * 00:45:56.439 Mar 1: ISAKMP (0:1007): received 10.10.10.13 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) CONF_ADDR

  * 1 Mar 00:45:56.439: DGVPN:crypt_iv after decrypt, its: 650BE464

  7BCF116E8E4DFF6C

  * 00:45:56.443 Mar 1:

  * 00:45:56.443 Mar 1: ISAKMP: content of the packet of information (flags, 1, len 92):

  * 00:45:56.447 Mar 1: HASH payload

  * 00:45:56.447 Mar 1: delete payload

  * 00:45:56.459 Mar 1: ISAKMP: content of the packet of information (flags, 1, len 80):

  * 00:45:56.459 Mar 1: HASH payload

  * 00:45:56.459 Mar 1: delete payload

  * 1 Mar 00:45:56.459: DGVPN: crypt_iv after encrypting, its: 650BE464

  Change it to client mode and try it.

  Kind regards

  Michal

• Check the ISE for the VPN Cisco posture

  Hello community,

  first of all thank you for taking the time to read my post. I have a deployment in which requires the characteristic posture of controls for machines of VPN Cisco ISE. I know that logically once a machine on the LAN, Cisco ISE can detect and apply controls posture on clients with the Anyconnect agent but what about VPN machines? The VPN will end via a VPN concentrator, which then connects to an ASA5555X that is deployed as an IPS only. Are there clues to this?

  Thank you!

  The Cisco ASA Version 9.2.1 supports the change in RADIUS authorization (CoA) (RFC 5176). This allows for the gesticulations of users against the ISE Cisco VPN without the need of an IPN. Once a VPN user connects, the ASA redirects web traffic to the LSE, where the user is configured with a Network Admission Control (NAC) or Web Agent. The agent performs specific controls on the user's computer to determine its conformity against one together configured posture rules, such as the rules of operating system (OS) patches, AntiVirus, registry, Application, or Service.

  The posture validation results are then sent to the ISE. If the machine is considered the complaint, then the ISE can send a RADIUS CoA to the ASA with the new set of authorization policies. After validation of the successful posture and CoA, the user is allowed to access internal resources.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-Appliance-ASA-software/117693-configure-ASA-00.html

• Client VPN Cisco router Cisco, MSW CA + certificates

  Dear Sirs,
  Let me approach you on the following problem.

  I wanted to use a secure between the Cisco VPN client connection
  (Windows XP) and Cisco 2821 with certificate-based authentication.
  I used the Microsoft certification authority (Windows 2003 server).
  Cisco VPN client used eTokenPRO Aladdin as a certificate store.

  Certificate of MSW CA registration and implementation in eToken ran OK
  Customer VPN Cisco doesn't have a problem with the cooperation of eToken.
  Certificate of registration of Cisco2821 MSW ca ran okay too.

  Cisco 2821 configuration is standard. IOS version 12.4 (6).

  Attempt to connect to the client VPN Cisco on Cisco 2821 was
  last update of the error messages:

  ISAKMP: (1020): cannot get router cert or routerdoes do not have a cert: had to find DN!
  ISAKMP: (1020): ITS been RSA signature authentication more XAUTH using id ID_FQDN type
  ISAKMP (1020): payload ID
  next payload: 6
  type: 2
  FULL domain name: cisco - ca.firm.com
  Protocol: 17
  Port: 500
  Length: 25
  ISAKMP: (1020): the total payload length: 25
  ISAKMP (1020): no cert string to send to peers
  ISAKMP (1020): peer not specified not issuing and none found appropriate profile
  ISAKMP (1020): Action of WSF returned the error: 2
  ISAKMP: (1020): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
  ISAKMP: (1020): former State = new State IKE_R_MM5 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  Is there some refence where is possible to find some information on
  This problem? There is someone who knows how to understand these mistakes?
  Thank you very much for your help.

  Best regards
  P.Sonenberk

  PS Some useful information for people who are interested in the above problem.

  Address IP of Cisco 2821 10.1.1.220, client VPN IP address is 10.1.1.133.
  MSW's IP 10.1.1.50.
  Important parts of the Cisco 2821 configuration:

  !
  cisco-ca hostname
  !
  ................
  AAA new-model
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  ...............
  IP domain name firm.com
  host IP company-cu 10.1.1.50
  host to IP cisco-vpn1 10.1.1.133
  name of the IP-server 10.1.1.33
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4097309259
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 4097309259
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4097309259
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint company-cu
  registration mode ra
  Enrollment url http://10.1.1.50:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
  use of ike
  Serial number no
  IP address no
  password 7 005C31272503535729701A1B5E40523647
  revocation checking no
  !
  TP-self-signed-4097309259 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
  30820249 308201B 2 A0030201 02020101 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030
  .............
  FEDDCCEA 8FD14836 24CDD736 34
  quit smoking
  company-cu pki encryption certificate chain
  certificate 1150A66F000100000013
  30820509 308203F1 A0030201 02020 HAS 11 092A 8648 01000000 13300 06 50A66F00
  ...............
  9E417C44 2062BFD5 F4FB9C0B AA
  quit smoking
  certificate ca 51BAC7C822D1F6A3469D1ADC32D0EB8C
  30820489 30820371 A0030201 BAC7C822 02021051 D1F6A346 9D1ADC32 D0EB8C30
  ...............
  C379F382 36E0A54E 0A6278A7 46
  quit smoking
  !
  ...................
  crypto ISAKMP policy 30
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  authentication rsa-BA
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto identity hostname
  !
  Configuration group customer isakmp crypto Group159
  key Key159Key
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  the crypto isakmp client configuration group them
  domain firm.com
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  ACL 100
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac 3DES-MD5
  !
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
  the transform-set 3DES-MD5 value
  market arriere-route
  !
  card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
  client configuration address map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto answer
  map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
  !
  ................
  !
  end

  status company-cu of Cisco-ca #show cryptographic pki trustpoints
  Trustpoint company-cu:
  Issuing CA certificate configured:
  Name of the object:
  CN = firm-cu, dc = company, dc = local
  Fingerprint MD5: 5026582F 8CF455F8 56151047 2FFAC0D6
  Fingerprint SHA1: 47B 74974 7C85EA48 760516DE AAC84C5D 4427E829
  Universal router configured certificate:
  Name of the object:
  host name = cisco - ca.firm.com
  Fingerprint MD5: E78702ED 47D5D36F B732CC4C BA97A4ED
  Fingerprint SHA1: 78DEAE7E ACC12F15 1DFB4EB8 7FC DC6F3B7E 00138
  State:
  Generated keys... Yes (general purpose, not exportable)
  Authenticated issuing certification authority... Yes
  Request certificate (s)... Yes

  Cisco-ca #sh crypto pubkey-door-key rsa
  Code: M - configured manually, C - excerpt from certificate

  Name of code use IP-address/VRF Keyring
  C Signature name of X.500 DN default:
  CN = firm-cu
  DC = company
  DC = local

  C signature by default cisco-vpn1

  IMPORTANT: I don't have a Cisco IOS Software: 12.4 (5), 12.3 (11) T08, 12.4 (4.7) PI03c,.
  12.4 (4.7) T - there is error in the cryptographic module.

  Hey guys, it's weird that the router is not find cert after IKE is the cert and validates, it is certainly not reason, but I would go ahead and set up the mapping of certificate on this router to force the client to associate with Group of IKE, for that matter, that you need to change your config a bit for use iskamp profiles :

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_isakp.html

• IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1

  We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1:

  Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580:

  standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  internal group gpTest strategy

  gpTest group policy attributes

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest

  type tunnel-group test remote access

  tunnel-group test general attributes

  address localpool pool

  Group Policy - by default-gpTest

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  accounting-server-group Gserver

  IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test

  pre-shared-key cisco123

  GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS.

  When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get

  error:

  22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret

  (pls see picture to attach it)

  the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log.

  Thanks for any help you can provide!

  Duyen

  Hello Duyen,

  I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package.

  Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group:

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group.

  Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group:

  No authorization-server-group Gserver

  Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS.

  Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards.

• Order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA

  Hello

  I have a question about the order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA 8.2.x. I have a scenario where the internal IP address of the range 10.17.128.x are NATTED IP public 31.10.10.x. below is the config:

  Tunnel normally passes traffic to dmz - 31.10.11.10, 31.10.11.11 servers.

  But the servers NATTED (10.17.128.x <->31.10.10.x) does not work.

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 General-attributes

  Group Policy - by default-PHX_HK

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 100.1.1.1

  pre-shared key *.

  internal PHX_HK group policy

  PHX_HK group policy attributes

  VPN-filter no

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec svc webvpn

  card crypto inside_map 50 match address outside_cryptomap_50

  peer set card crypto inside_map 50 100.1.1.1

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  inside_map crypto 50 card value reverse-road

  the PHX_Local object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  the HK_Remote object-group network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_INSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_OUTSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group HK_Remote-group of objects PHX_Local

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  Route outside 102.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 30.1.1.1 1

  public static 31.10.10.10 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.20 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.11 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.21 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.12 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.22 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.13 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.23 netmask 255.255.255.255

  He started to work when I did another group of object by name PHX_Local1 and added to the list of access inside_nat0_outbound, instead of the object group PHX_Local, as below:

  the PHX_Local1 object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  No inside_nat0_outbound access list extended only to allowed ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local1-group of objects HK_Remote

  Can you please help me understand why group object PHX_Local failed with access-list inside_nat0_outbound, but he began to work with the Group of objects PHX_Local1.

  Also, if you could tell me the order of operations to NAT via VPN Site to Site, it would be useful.

  Thank you

  Kind regards

  Thomas

  Hello

  I think you could have said the original question in a way that could be missleading. In other words, if I understand now.

  From what I understand now, you have the DMZ set up the server that are measured with a public IP address on the real servers. And for those that you have configured NAT0.

  Then you have other servers that do not have public IP addresses themselves, but they are translated on the SAA.

  If this is the case, then the next question would be. The server with the NAT should attend the L2L VPN connection with their real IP or address IP NAT.

  Of course if you configure static NAT for the same servers and NAT0 the NAT0 will always win.

  You have these guests who were not able to use the VPN L2L

  31.10.10.10 10.17.128.20

  31.10.10.11 10.17.128.21

  31.10.10.12 10.17.128.22

  31.10.10.13 10.17.128.23

  IF you want them to go to the VPN L2L with their original IP address then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  IF you want to use the L2L VPN with the public IP address, then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  EDIT: in this case you naturally do not configure any NAT0 for actual IP addresses we want precisely the IP addresses to be visible to the L2L VPN with the IP NAT address.

  Or you can of course use the same "object-group" as currently but change the content in an appropriate manner

  Be sure to mark it as answered if it was answered.

  Ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Customer Cisco IPSec vpn cisco ios router <>==

  Hello

  I need to implement ipsec vpn for all users of 10-15. They all use the vpn cisco 5.x client and we have a router for cisco ios at the office. We already have a situation of work for these users. However, it has become a necessity which known only devices (laptops company) are allowed to install a virtual private network.

  I think that the only way to achieve this is to use certificates. But we don't won't to buy certificates if there is a free way to implement. So my question is

  (1) what are the options I have to configure vpn ipsec, where only known devices can properly configure a vpn and all unknown devices are blocked?

  (2) if the certificate is the only way. Can I somehow produce these certificates myself using cisco router ios?

  (3) someone at - it an example of a similar installation/configuration?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  M.

  Unfortunately if you connect to the router IOS, there is no other way except using the certificate. If you connect to a Cisco ASA firewall, then you can identify the laptop company using DAP (Dynamic Access Policy).

• What clients VPN Cisco 2811 supports?

  Is the solution of VPN Cisco 2811 locked customers cisco or that market with other brands too?

  Best regards Tommy Svensson

  Hello

  With the correct IOS feature set, it will support IPsec VPN clients. This includes not only the Cisco VPN client but almost any standard IPsec client.

  In addition, if on the 2811 can accept any browser SSL VPN connections, or even use the AnyConnect SSL client.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Is supported PPTP vpn cisco ASA 5520 firewall?

  Hi all

  I'm Md.kamruzzaman. My compnay buy a firewall of cisco asa 5520 and I want to configure PPTP vpn on asa 5520 firewall. Is it possible to configure the PPTP vpn to asa firewall. If possible can you please tell me what is the procedure to configure the PPTP vpn.

  Best regards

  MD.kamruzzaman

  Sorry, but the Cisco ASA firewall does not support PPTP VPN termination.

  You may terminate IPSec and SSL VPN but not of type PPTP.

  If you are new to the ASA, how best to configure the supported VPN types is via the VPN Wizard integrated into the application of management of ASSISTANT Deputy Ministers.

• VPN CISCO RV110W fail.

  Hello

  I have a router Aztech DSL1015EW (S) and Cisco RV100w. Here's my setup.

  Phone - RJ11---> DSL1015EW (S) - RJ45---> RV110W

  -J' tried to build the portable computer remote VPN connection to RV110W (failed)

  -Also failefk quick VPN

  -PPTP failed

  Port forwarding on DSL1015EW

  I don't have the public ip address

  I use dydns.

  What can I do? Please help me.

  Fast VPN error message is "bridge not answer do you expect ot.

  PPTP error code is cannot estiblishe to the remote host.

  Hello

  Hi, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I left the community of support to small businesses.

  I apologize for your stress, in this case I advise you to check this link with useful information about the VPN fast https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399

  I hope you find this answer useful,

  "* Please mark the issue as response or write it down so others can benefit from.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodríguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• VPN Cisco 2911

  Hello

  I am thinking purchase 2911-SEC/K9 Cisco router.

  IM wondering witch VPN types can I use to participate in the network? I think that I read that IPsec site-to-site is not a problem but im wondering PPTP or something like that. What type of VPN solution customer, I can use. IM thinking on the use of the premium Anyconnect if this is possible with the 2911 router. I also wonder how much the cost for this will be user and connection.

  Best regards Tommy Svensson

  Hi Tommy,.

  With a 2911 and the licensing of security for the IOS, you can use IPsec VPN or SSL VPN (AnyConnect).

  Traditionally IPsec VPNS allow remote clients to connect by using a client software and also helps the Site-to-Site connections other peers (ASAs, IOS devices, third party, etc.).

  SSL VPN now offers over HTTPS, which you don't need to worry about encryption at the network layer (as in IPsec).

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Windows Firewall is down all packets coming from a PPTP site to site VPN

  I have a PPTP VPN site-to-site built with RRAS. The branch server is a Windows Server 2003, and the main Office Server is a Windows Server 2008 R2. Public profile Windows Firewall log shows that all packages of the branch are declining.

  Curiously, I can access all the main office desktop computers.

  The configuration is:

  Main office:
  Network address: 192.168.0.0/24
  IP address of the server: 192.168.0.3/24

  Branch:
  Network address: 192.168.1.0/24
  IP address of the server: 192.168.1.1/24

  I guess that both tunnels are ok because RRAS shows that interfaces are connected. Each PPTP server interface receives an IP address assigned by remote RRAS.

  There is no set of packet filters.
  There are firewall rules allow ICMPv4 inbound and outbound traffic.

  When I try to ping 192.168.0.3 from the Branch Office Server, Windows Firewall records in the log of public profile:

  2011-09-28 16:10:44 DROP ICMP 192.168.0.102 192.168.0.3 - 0-0 0 - RECEIVE

  where 192.168.0.102 is the address PPP assigned to the Head Office of RRAS.

  Any help will be appreciated and very helpful.

  Thank you.

  Hello
   
  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet Forum. You can follow the link to your question:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itpro
   
  Hope that helps.

• Configuration of VPN Cisco RV220W wireless

  Hello expert support.

  We have a RV220 Wireless Network Security Cisco Firewall.  It is currently configured to provide access only to select users.  Asked me to configure it to provide access to users of hotspots or home networks.  Thought which is on the road, or at home that they would use their home network or a location of hot point to the VPN to the RV220 to access the documents they needed.

  My hypothesis was set up VPN with the users who access the QuickVPN client.  I followed the setup steps, but VPN access failed.

  Anyone who has tried or succeeded in a configuration like that?  I have read a number of posts with users having problems, just configure the VPN and access with QuickVPN.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Michael

  Try this first.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/app_notes/QuickVPN_an_OL-25680.PDF

  If the problem persists, please call the support help center.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

• Support VPN Cisco 881

  Hi all

  I am not cisco trained or worked with cisco, im a complete beginner in Cisco platforms. We are an IT support MPH and we have recently taken on a client that has an office abroad using a Cisco 881 device with a Draytek router to the United Kingdom. Site to site connectivity is necessary. I watched and watched videos of youtube on how to configure the VPN and think I have it in place by using the config on the cisco below:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  isakmp encryption key * address *.
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac sha3des
  !
  crypto map 1 VPN ipsec-isakmp
  set peer *.
  Set transform-set sha3des
  PFS group2 Set
  match address UK

  !

  interface FastEthernet4
  IP address
  IP access-group netbios in
  IP access-group netbios on
  no ip proxy-arp
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  no ip-cache cef route
  no ip route cache
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  No cdp enable
  VPN crypto card

  !
  interface Vlan1
  secondary IP address
  IP 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group netbios in
  IP access-group netbios on
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  no ip-cache cef route
  no ip route cache
  !

  UK extended IP access list
  allow IP 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.255
  allow IP 0.0.0.255 0.0.0.255

  It shows the VPN and active but there is no movement between the two and I do not know why...

  Current state of the session crypto

  Interface: FastEthernet4
  The session state: UP-ACTIVE
  Peer: port of 500
  IKEv1 SA: local remote 500 500 Active
  FLOW IPSEC: ip allow /255.255.255.0 /255.255.255.0
  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto
  FLOW IPSEC: ip allow /255.255.255.0 /255.255.255.0
  Active sAs: 2, origin: card crypto

  So it all seems perfect, however, if I try and ping the remote remote sites over ip LAN router I get the following:

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, 100 bytes to ICMP echoes, waiting time is 2 seconds:
  .....
  Success rate is 0% (0/5)

  I also can't ping the remote site in the Cisco lan.

  I think that it is towards the end of cisco, the Draytek is a basic router and no routing is able to be configured. It does it automatically. The VPN is so no traffic...

  Please can someone point me in the right directoin?

  Thank you

  The additional ip route does not harm even if it is not needed. I love these additional routes that they can serve as a sort of "online documentation" when it is used with a keyword "name" extra at the end.

  Your NAT - ACL does not have the traffic. Just add the following:

   ip access-list ext 102 1 deny ip  0.0.0.255  0.0.0.255