QOS port ranges

Similar Questions

• WRT54GL Port Range Forwarding?

  Hello. In Port Range Forwarding, there are only 10 lines (konfigurating 10 different ports.). What happens if you need to pass more than 10 ports?

  Installation of the 3rd firmware like dd - wrt or tomato.
  Of course, you should not need so many expeditions in the first instance.

• HowTo: Define and provide a personalized service with disjoint / port range.

  I have a rv180 and I'm trying to implement a custom service that contains multiple ports two disjoint (some UDP some TCP), as well as a range of TCP ports. This has lead me to a few questions.

  (1) is it still possible to have a unique personalized service with disjoint ports? He'll just have to set several partial service for this?

  (2) is it possible to forward a port range? How to define a service with a range of ports, it is clear, but port forwarding interface table only allows me to select a LAN port side for any service. Is there a secret notation that I do here which will be just forward to the same port LAN side as port WAN-side - NAT effectively a transfer, but just for the selected service?

  Thank you

  Luke

  Hi Luke,.

  (1) Unfortunately, it seems that you have to implement services customized for each set of disjoint ports and then create rules of transfer for each custom port.

  (2) I'm not 100% sure that I follow your question, but I think I got the essential. Port forwarding will forward traffic on the specific port (service) of your wan IP public designated private IP (destination IP) address. You can restrict the access of calendar or IP ('source to users' - by the host or the beach). Because looks like you have several customized services, you must create a configuration for each service of port forwarding.

  I hope this helps.

  Best,

  David

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

• Problem LRT224 Port Range Forwarding

  Hello

  I have a new router Linksys LRT224 Dual WAN Gigabit. I want to allow traffic to be analyzed on port 9100.

  Connection accepted TCP 91.102.93.5:63261-> 192.168.0. 48:9100 on eth0

  I understand that it has accepted my request on port 9100 and sent to the 92.168.0.48:9100.

  But nothing happens. When I telnet to 192.168.0.48 9100 inside this works if the printer seems to work fine.

  OK, I found the problem. And it wasn't the LRT224. After reset of the printer, I worked :-)

• WRT1900AC - together open the ports of the specified destination IP address range

  Is there a way to WRT1900AC to open a specified range of ports in the range of the specific destination ip address? I can see the options to open a port range to the local IP address on the LAN.

  You use a VoIP devcie or is this T-Mobile phones through the router?

  If you have a VoIP device as a microcell you can just put its IP address in the DMZ.

  You can try to set 0-65535 in triggering Serial Port and see how it works. I use this for Xbox games and reach the status of nat OPEN for games.

• range of ports open WRT54G

  How to open the port range for these ports:

  udp88

  udp3074

  tcp3074

  on my wrt54g

  Log on to http://192.168.1.1

  Leave the user name and password - admin (lowercase)

  Click on apps and games tab

  Click on port trigger - assign any name in the box of the application

  Enter port numbers 88 boxes that first line - box to activate.

  In the second row - 3074 in boxes of four - checkbox to activate.

  Save the settings.

• RV220W transfer of a range of ports

  How can we transfer a port range?

  Suppose that I have defined the following service:

  Service: TEST

  Port type: UDP

  From port: 5060

  End port: 5070

  and I want to send to a specific IP address. Then, if I create a new port forwarding rule for this service he asked me to specify a unique port number to be used internally as:

  Action: Always allow the

  Service: TEST

  Source IP: no

  Destination IP: 10.0.0.100

  Internal port:?

  I want to forward all ports 5060 to 5070 5060 to 5070 internal range.

  How can I do?

  I have the same problem with the duty to convey a range of ports to a single ip address. At the moment I can't put the rv220w in the network to test because we are in the middle of the day and I can't take the network down.

  Just a warning:

  * This has not been tested in an active network *.

  I've done the following:

  Go to the firewall.

  Access rules

  Add the new rule:

  Type of connection: incoming (wan (internet) > LAN (local area network))

  Action: Always allow the

  Service: 'TEST '.

  Source IP: no

  Send to the Server Local (DNAT IP): 10.0.0.100

  Press on save and it "appears" to work. Yet once I have not tested myself so just be careful because I don't know if it works correctly now. When I am able to put the router of the network and test this I will follow.

• Reduce the range of ports for calls crossed - Freeway

  Hi all

  We currently have MRA deployment but we have a problem with the "Crossing Media port" range set up in the subzone of the crossing. By default, this interval spend 36000 to 59999, but the FW team must reduce this ports open to 36000-36511. Is this supported?

  After change of the range we did call Jabber tests in Internet and the call is established, but we have no audio in both directions, after taking a trace with tcpdump in traffic RTP EXP-C/E see the 480XX range.

  Any idea to reduce this range without impact in the service?

  Thank you!

  If you go to maintenance > tools > using the Port, you are able to watch all the different ports inbound/outbound highway has set up, if you are able to edit and change of range, there will be a display/change option that will take you directly to the page of configuring these ports.  Don't forget if you are editing a port range, either on the Express-C or - E track, don't forget to check if the other should also be changed.

• Range of RV 120W port forwarding

  Hello

  I'm not a tech guy but must take care of some basic stuff IT. I got Etherfast cable/dsl router, and with RV 120W router it changed. There was internet comment now works slowly--what could be the reason for this?

  I copied most of the settings. First big technical problem was with the phone. It stoped working - call could get answered through, but when there was no noise. We use the linksys modem VoIP. I called opreater and was told to disable sip algo I have done this and improved a little service. When you answer a call sound could get through but would stop for a few moments, then continue. The operator told me to pass the port 16384 to 16482 on the VoIP modem IP.

  But I can put only transfer to a port at the time in the "Port forwarding" settings. Is it possible to pass to the port range?

  Thank you

  port forwarding has experienced problems in the RV220W and is recommended only to use the firewall access rules instead.  Try this on your RV120W

  also, you should be able to configure a service customized to allow ranges of ports.

• Range of Ports RTP endpoints TC changed after registering with CUCM

  Hello community,

  We have SX80 endpoints running TC7.3.2 and registered at CUCM 11.

  By default the TC ports rank 2326-2487 UDP RTP endpoints. After registering with CUCM, the range of ports have been changed to 16384 to 32766. In my view, WHAT CUCM change the codec settings.

  rtp_ports.PNG

  

  Based on the http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/tc7/administration-guide/administering-endpoints-running-tc72-on-ucm1051.pdf guide I couldn't see any setting to do with RTP ports.

  This is a problem for us, because on the firewall rules, we have configured and fixed ports for points endpoints use the default go 2326-2487 UDP. Because these endpoints and video infrastructure (servers of telepresence, TCS, VCS) are on different networks separated by firewalls. At present, when recording and join the conference bridge there are no media because ports have been changed. When I change the default port range, there is no problem with the media. I can record and call to the conference bridge hosted by a TP server successfully. And if I hit the button refresh on the web GUI of the codec, 16384 to 32766 changes the settings.

  Y at - it a setting that I could check on the side of CUCM?

  Thanks in advance.

  «By default the endpoints ports rank 2326-2487 UDP RTP TC.» After registering with CUCM, the range of ports have been changed to 16384 to 32766. "I believe THAT CUCM change the codec settings".

  Yes, it's true. Once your video endpoint is configured and registered on the CUCM, the CUCM will be more than just the default settings of your endpoint. It depends on the SIP profile has been used and applied for your endpoint. You need to check that the configuration of the SIP profile of the CUCM applied for your endpoint. In your case if it's SX80, check the SIP for SX80 profile and change the start and stop media ports. It comes to the RTP port range.

  In your case:

  Port of bootable media: 2326

  Stop Media Port: 2487

  rtp_cucm.PNG

  

  Kind regards

  Acevirgil

• Range of ports Application Tuxedo

  Hi all

  Is it possible to restrict the tuxedo application to use a specified range of ports while it is & running (except JSL, WSL, GWTDOMAIN)?

  Question - the tux request arrives with random ports assigned to the application connection to the DB servers, who sometimes is of WSL, JSL, NWADDR of another application of Tuxedo who was expected to come later on the same box.

  I am looking for a way to limit the first application of tux to come within the port range specified for servers. So they do not overlap with other Tux (WSL, JSL, NWADDR).

  Thanks in advance.

  
  

  Hello

  You can avoid this problem by ensuring that the ports used by the different Tuxedo system servers (WSL, ISL, GWTDOMAIN, BRIDGE, etc.) out of the range of ephemeral ports for your operating system.  This will ensure the connection of client as in the database that use (ephemeral ports) ports of the source never comes into conflict with one of your server's ports.  In the above example, 12249 and 12251 ports are ephemeral ports, i.e., dynamically allocated ports by the operating system specifically for the initiated client connections source port.

  See this section to determine how to change the range of ephemeral ports for your operating system if you need to do.

  Kind regards

  Todd little

  Chief Architect of Oracle Tuxedo

• WAG160Nv2 v2.00.21 Port Forwarding

  Hello my problem is that I was not able to setup port forwarding.

  WAG160Nv2 Firmware V2.00.21 (I think that Schedule A)

  configuration:

  • only the port forwarding: all OFF
  • forwarding port range: 40000 to 54000 two PC ip protocols
  • PC connects with static IP below 192.168.1.100 from where starts DHCP server on the router
  • trigger port range: all OFF
  • QoS (Quality of Service): all OFF
  • DMZ: OF
  • Access restrictions: disabled
  • SPI Firewall / filters / block WAN requests: all OFF
  • VPN Passthrough: OFF
  • Isolation of the AP: OFF
  • NAT: WE
  • RIP: disabled
  • uPnP: OFF (I tried in combination with ALG)
  • IGMP proxy: OFF
  • SIP ALG: OFF (I tried in combination with uPnP)
  • already pressing reset for a long time after the firmware update, lost all the settings (the number of seconds that I have to press it? (I must have tried 30 +) Factory Defaults did the same thing?

  How I checked:

  • Transmission (torrent program): use uPnP or NAT - PMP router is DISABLED, use port = 40101, port test shows closed
  • Nmap Pei 40000-54000 - T4 - A - v 192.168.1.1 which gives «...» All scanned ports 14001 on 192.168.1.1 are closed... »
  • EDIT: also checked http://www.canyouseeme.org/ AND http://www.portchecktool.com/
  • EDIT: have you: netstat - LNP | grep 40101 on my PC
    TCP 0 0 0.0.0.0:40101 0.0.0.0: * LISTEN 26429/transmission.
    tcp6 0 0: 40101: * LISTEN 26429/transmission.

  Thank you very much in advance

  What is your internet IP address, tsester? I think that there is a double NAT on your network. If you get a private IP address, I suggest that you contact your ISP and your current subscription go to full bridge mode. Next, configure the router again based on the new settings and see if it will solve the problem.

• Wrt330n QOS

  Hi anyone knows how to use QOS in wrt330n router? I try putting in place, but do not know what to put in the remote ip address range.

  Range of local IP addresses must be the IP address of your computer (s) you want to use the rule...

  Remote IP address range is the range of addresses that you connect to the Internet. In most cases, you leave it to 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255, which means that the rule will work when you connect to another computer or server on the Internet...

  Local IP port range should be the port use to connect to you. Remote IP port range is the port you use to connect to others...

• local web development issue: server and ampps port 80 conflict

  Hi all

  I want to set up a development environment web very nice for me on my MacBook Air.

  I want to run apple server and ampps, but both use the same port number 80.

  Is it possible to create a set up so that the two can run on the same computer?

  If so, how?

  Thank you and happy holidays!

  Basically, no.   Two different TCP servers cannot use the same port at the same time.  It's a basic conflict.

  OS X is provided with Apache, and that works fine.   OS X Server provides tools to configure, manage, and extend the Apache environment.   Add on packages it as AMPPS, MAMP or XAMPP provide their own versions of Apache and other pieces.

  Most web servers can be launched on a port range, and it's usually easier with the package of additional components and the built-in OS X Apache Web server.

  OS X Server is rarely used on laptops, as OS X Server works usually better with static IP addresses, and laptops generally roam and thus generally have dynamic IP DHCP addresses.

  TL; DR: The standard port and a virtual host, or use the standard web server or Add on to a port of type variant.

• How can I put the Windows XP firewall in a port configuration 'allow all' and only block some ports?

  Without going into the details of why I need to do this, I'm putting the firewall of Windows XP in one allow all the configuration of ports and only refuse some ports I have in a list.

  I train this script via the command-line batch with the netsh firewall add portopening command.  From what I've read, if enabled the firewall denies all traffic and only allows ports with exceptions, so through batch scripts, I opened all the 65 000 + ports TCP and UDP, essentially with the firewall turned on but in a configuration of "allow all the»  I don't deny the 100 or so ports to my list that I want blocked after they are all open.

  This strategy seems to work, but the problem I waited and I now see is that svchost.exe takes 50% of my CPU time, have to deal with constantly these firewall rules.

  "From what I've seen on Windows XP, there is no way to have the firewall ON, and in a configuration of" allow all the "" because the XP firewall may not have defined port ranges, they must be defined one by one.  It looks like Windows Vista or 7 would be much easier because the firewall has got a re vamp of advanced features.

  Does anyone have a suggestion on how to realize this "allow all", deny some' strategy?  I know it's a strange use of the Windows Firewall, so let's please jump in front of a 'why would you do this incredibly stupid thing?"messages.

  Also, if it was the wrong forum (or website) to post on for this kind of question, I'd appreciate a recommendation of a more appropriate forum.

  Hello

  See the steps in the following article.

  How to manually open ports in Internet Connection Firewall in Windows XP?

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/308127