Question on the scale to the size of the image.

Similar Questions

• Questions about the images shared in Photos

  My wife and I have a shared photo album, and I copied a picture inside. So I decided to crop the image, I did on the version in my own library. I was surprised that the changes appear in the shared image. Issues related to the:

  • Are changes as it's supposed to appear on the shared item?
  • When the images are 'shared' in this way, they only live in the cloud?
  • If I delete the original in my library, the "shared" version still there?

  Thank you!

  • Are changes as it's supposed to appear on the shared item?

  No, after the shared photo editing, share the again edited version.

  • When the images are 'shared' in this way, they only live in the cloud?

  They are stored on iCloud and downloads local shadow copies, which are visible in your library of Photos from your Mac.  But shared photos are not added to your photo library, unless you are importing.

  • If I delete the original in my library, the "shared" version still there?

  Yes, the shared version will remain in iCloud, until you remove the photo of your stream shared.

• Questions about the Image matte key

  I'm quite confused on Overlay of Imageand would like to comment on these observations:

  1. When I apply a picture as a cache, it does not seem possible at first to determine what image I used as the matte. After that I applied a mast, can I know what image is used as the mast?
  2. I have a 1920 x 1080 in grayscale, image PSD which is used as cache. The central part of the matte is black, the rest is white. I checked the RGB values in the matte and they 0,0,0 or 255, 255, 255. In the effect of overlay of Image inside the first I composite using Luma Matteand marked to reverse. If I reverse the image in Photoshop so that the Blacks are going to white and vice versa, it makes no difference in the creation. The effect of the matte is the same. Why is this?
  3. If I apply the matte from 1920 x 1080 to an image inside the first superior at 1920 x 1080, the cache does not work. Is this normal? I can get the matte works with the larger image in a new sequence and then this sequence inside the original sequence of nesting, but I do not understand why it is necessary.

  Any feedback is most appreciated. I use CS6.

  Guy,

  Then, you should migrate to the masking effect Track Matte.  Formally, you import the matte in the project (traceable through the reveal in Finder/Explorer) and place on a track above the video in need of carpet.   The effect is placed on the clip (V1) and configured to play the matte on V2 etc.

  

• Questions about the Image of the space, toolbar buttons, resize, arrows

  Here are a few beginner questions more.

  1. is it possible to get rid of the task bars that I have drawn autour ellipses? I rarely use them and would rather have the space.

  

  2. in the reference doc, there are more icons in the space indicated by the arrow. How can I customize this space?

  3. in the resizing of an image, 98% of the time I want to do in percent. Is it possible to do that by default? I could handle this with a keyboard macro, but the pixels to percent drop is not accessible via the keyboard. Solution?

  4. How can I tell PSE 14 make me draw an arrow (i.e., a straight line with a tip of arrow at one end)?

  Thank you very much

  Al

  1. is it possible to get rid of the task bars that I have drawn autour ellipses? I rarely use them and would rather have the space.

  Unfortunately, no. Many users would like.

  2. in the reference doc, there are more icons in the space indicated by the arrow. How can I customize this space?

  For me, I always have these icons on the right... Have no idea at the moment.

  3. in the resizing of an image, 98% of the time I want to do in percent. Is it possible to do that by default? I could handle this with a keyboard macro, but the pixels to percent drop is not accessible via the keyboard. Solution?

  These settings are not 'sticky', unfortunately.

  4. How can I tell PSE 14 make me draw an arrow (i.e., a straight line with a tip of arrow at one end)?

  Two ways: either as a tool option online, or by choosing a type of arrow in the menu (hotkey U) forms.

  Edit:

  The #1 question, my choice is to use the Preferences menu and select 'allow documents floating in expert mode. Allows you to use the screen for editing, which is recommended when you master the main shortcuts. Another tip: the 'tab' key hides the side panels.

• Satellite Pro L670 - 14 p - Question on the image editing screen

  Hi people,

  Have just bought the above laptop model online supercharged, 6 GB of RAM and had a few doubts about its relevance to specific tasks after reading a forum or 2 - (not this one). As I have not started because I can return it for a full refund (but must notify the seller prior to Wednesday 12 may not start if I want the refund) I was not able to solve the problems that I may have to know;

  1. I bought a versatile laptop because it is widescreen (have never owned a laptop before and served to 23 "screen on a desktop computer) BUT I do a reasonable amount of photography and the machine should display images at a decent level. It is a sine qua non for the purchase of the Toshiba. If it will not be so he can go back. Unfortunately I was not able to find the similar model in any store on site to see how it behaves.

  2 have you read angles of vision are not large.

  3. good quality is mediocre.

  Have anyone of you experience with this model, particularly if you're a photgraphy, and can you comment please? Any help will be appreciated.

  Thank you very much.

  > 1. I bought a versatile laptop because it is widescreen (have never owned a laptop before and served to 23 "screen on a desktop computer) BUT I do a reasonable amount of photography and the machine should display images at a decent level. It is a sine qua non for the purchase of the Toshiba. If it will not be so he can go back. Unfortunately, I was not able to find the similar model in any store on site to see how it behaves

  You can use this laptop for different purposes
  The laptop supports a 17.3 HD + TFT color LCD with a resolution of 1600 x 900 and 16:9 aspect ratio.
  For me, this looks like a great LCD!

  > 2. Reading view angles aren't great.

  _Horizontal look an Angle_
  -40 ~ + 40 degrees(Min.),-45 ~ + 45 degrees (Typ.)

  _Vertical look at an Angle_
  -10 ~ + 30 degrees(Min.),-15 ~ + 35 degrees (Typ.)

  Dot Pitch 0.2388 0.2388 x mm

  > 3. Sound quality is poor.
  The laptop supports the audio chip Realtek ALC259-GR like most laptops.
  Can not say something about the speakers, but it looks like they are not too small

• A question about the image quality?

  I create my menus by using an image that is offered by selected relative when positioning.

  That's by the by... However my menu option is set on the screen as 30 pixels wide.

  If I create the actual image as 30 pixels wide so that the text is very unbalanced and is horrible.

  So if my menu shows 400px by 30px w h and image real must be 800px w h how do I create a good quality image without having such quality terrible 30px?

  I create higher resolution and then somehow reduce the width of the bottom?

  Thank you

  Terry

  Do you use a high-resolution Retina Display?

  Image quality is determined by the total number of pixels in your image - h X w, 325 x 200 500 x 400 vs and the 72 vs 96 ppi vs 300.  So if your screen has a pixel density of high, normal web images may appear grainy on your device but is generally not a problem for the screens with a normal pixel density.

  Consider using the Bootstrap Glyphicons or Fonts-Awesome icons and SVG.

  Open your PSD into illustrator and SaveAs SVG (scalable vector) that is much sharper than bitmaps.

  See the following article:

  A guide to creating a better web of retina - Ivo Mynttinen / User Interface DDesigner

  Nancy O.

• Question about the image of the user interface of the Script

  Hello world

  We can insert a picture into script

  Like this:

  var l is new window ('dialog', 'Testing');.

  var pictures = w.add ('image', undefined, the record ("" ~ / Desktop/mingxing2.jpg ""));

  w.Show ();

  But is it possible to say the script if you do not find the photo, we have the second choice

  Like this:

  var l is new window ('dialog', 'Testing');.

  var pictures = w.add ('image', undefined, of the file ("~ / Desktop/mingxing2.jpg" |)) (("" ~/Desktop/mingxing3.jpg "));

  w.Show ();

  or third choice...

  Thank you

  Respect of

  Teetan

  Hi Teetan,

  Why not call a function that returns the file you need?

  var getImageFile = function () {}

  var f = file (Folder.desktop+"/monImage.jpg');

  ! f.exists & f = file (Folder.desktop+"/image.jpg');

  ! f.exists & f = not defined;

  return f;

  }

  var l is new window ('dialog', 'Missing Image?');.

  flowers of the var = w.add ('image', the undefined, getImageFile());

  w.Show ();

  HTH,

  Loïc

• Dragging between two weird question of the image tilelists

  Hi all

  I have two lists of tile that display images. Both are enabled for drag and drop handling using the. In both cases I work around the default handling with preventDefault. When I drag an item in the list on the left, everything works fine. If I drag an element from the list on the right to the left, it seems to work ok, but there is a problem. If I move the mouse to the top of the container (the background is fine) the list begins to scroll automatically? It's the same the opposite effect (i.e. move from left to right). If I drag first in the list, and then do one of the other list - amount of the fine. If after loading the application, I drag only from the other list, so I see the problem. And there is no way to get rid of the auto-scroll except to reload. The executed code is the same for both cases.

  Is this a bug or am I missing something?

  Zahir

  Looks like a bug, we have fixed recently.  Try Flex 4 beta

• Very basic question about the images in tables

  So I made 4 buttons, 90 pixels wide by 20 pixels high each in photoshop. Then, I made a table 360 pixels wide by 20 pixels high in DW to make a small nav bar. Then I placed the 4 buttons in the table. Why is - it is showing only 366 pixels wide and when I saw the navigation bar on a browser that the 4th button down to the second line. There is no padding or margin adjustment so I wonder why it isn't an exact?
  

  27/09/06 20:47, "614mike" wrote:

  > So I made 4 buttons, 90 pixels wide by 20 pixels high each in photoshop. Then
  > I
  > done a width of 20 pixels high in DW to make a small nav bar table 360 pixels.
  > Then I placed the 4 buttons in the table. Why is this it is showing only 366 pixels wide
  > and when I saw the 4th button browser navigation bar falls down to the
  > second line. There is no padding or margin so I wonder why it is not a
  > exact fit?
  >
  >
  In fact said 0 padding and margin 0, or are you assuming that
  There is no padding or margin because you do not specify any?

  Most browsers use a padding by default and margin applied when you
  don't specify anything whatsoever, and it varies from a browser. Try
  specifying 0 padding and margin 0, if you do not already have.

  --
  Ghizlaine

• Link to the image in mySQL problem

  After completing most of the Q & A in this Forum, I can not yet solve the problem with the link of the image failed.

  Here is the link of the image information:

  1. the PHP code to retrieve the image:

  < td > < p > <? PHP echo $row_rsGetDescri ['itemNo'];? > < / p >

  < p > <? PHP echo $row_rsGetDescri ["itemDescri"];? > < / p > < table >

  < td > < img src = "thumbnails / <?" PHP echo row_getnailLink ["nailLink"];? > ' > < table >.

  There is absolutely no problem to recover the database data IE itemNo itemDescri except the images.

  2. the site is still in testing stage with the following data structure:

  

  the content of the image field, IE nailLink

  

  the images are stored in this way:

  C:\xampp\htdocs\asiaimperial\thumbnails

  5. the recordset is created:

  Your insight on this question of the image link is appreciated.

  Cordially Wen

  Thank you for your quick response.

  The problem is resolved by correcting the name of the W063TBL.jpg file in the path to match a LW063TBL.jpg database.  The incorrect file name so is to arrive first in the record.  If the image will never appear on the screen.  Cordially Wen

• Question on "Scale to the size of the image by default"

  Hello

  I put my sequence of 1080 p at 25 fps.

  However, my source material are a mixture of 4K video and also extracts of 720 p and also some pictures.

  I noticed that if I uncheck the "Default scale to the size of the image" box, each time, I put the clips imported into the timeline, it's too big and I have to go the effect controls panel to reduce the size. It is very time consuming especially if I have a lot of 4K video clips on the timeline.

  According to me, that if I check the box of 'Default scale to the size of the image', when I put the 4K video on the timeline, it fits very well. My question is when I enlarge him to say the Pan effect, of the resolution will be downgraded compared to when I do not check the "default scale to the size of the image" box?

  Thank you

  If you use the scale to the size of the image, either in manual application or by ticking the "default image size scale" in preferences, your clips will be scaled down (in the case of the 4 K sequence) or upwards (in the case of the sequence of 720 p). In both cases, the clips on the timeline for reference the original source material, so all of the pixel content present in the 4K source, for example, is always available for you to resize.

  You will notice, however, that if you open Motion and see the scale component - it will read 100% because - the clip on the timeline has indeed been reduced to sequence frame size - making it difficult to * how the clip was be reduced or enlarged as the balance indicates the same.

  A better way to edit the clips to the timeline the clip on the timeline, and then select and right click or control click and choose the size of the image, the value and now scale will reflect the percentage reduction or expansion, so you can see how much you can resize until you start to lose resolution.

  Unfortunately, the set to the size of the image is not yet available as a default, you will need to use it manually.

  MtD

• Pixelation when scaled to "scale to the size of the image?

  Hey all,.

  When I put a clip from 4 k to 'adapt to the size of the image' on a timeline of 1080 p and then it swings a bit, are there any negative pixelation/aliasing occurring as opposed to simply scaling the 4 k clip to the timeline 1080?

  In my view, that it is impossible to discern, but I was wondering if I do something wrong in my workflow.

  Thank you!

  Yes, "Scale to frame size" is destructive. If you open the effect controls panel and look at the scale parameter that you choose this option, you will see that the setting remains at "100" means that your newly reduced film is now 100% and everything above that will cause the loss of resolution.

  What you want is the much better "to the image size" option just below (in the context menu), which will scale your footage to 50%, in order to preserve your goodness in 4 K.

• Scale to the size of the image

  So I see that if I set the scale to the size of the image it dimensionnera my clips on import and I lose the high resolution... Sucks a bit

  Is in any way at all to the scale of the element when importing to the timeline? Final assembly used to do this, and it was awesome...

  I work with mixed 1080 p and 4 K images... So we are mastering 1080 p and whenever I shoot a clip of 4K I have to manually resize 50%

  Is it possible to automate this scale to 50%? The main reason I want to do with scale is some of the 4K clips that we have planned for crop... If default scale to the size of the frame that will mess up...

  Really surprised there is no easy way to do... I must be missing something...

  There is a way easier to do, but still not as easy as it should be.

  You can do a right click on the elements in the sequence and choose SETTING to the size of the image.  This will allow full resolution cropping.

  Be nice, if we didn't have that as a general preference, along the scale of intelligence.

• Default scale to the size of the image in 2015 CC

  Other issues on this subject come from 2012.  I use CC 2015.  I have preferences - default scale of size of frame check box. He has always worked in this project.  I thought that this meant simply that when you cut large images in the timeline, they automatically adjust to the size of the current image of the project. I've done several times before, and I can resize images - zoom - without loss of quality.   All of a sudden when I'm cutting the large images (JPEG, etcl) in the timeline with this project that's making them huge in the Progam monitor.  Am I missing something?

  Thank you

  Patrice

  and I can resize images - zoom - without loss of quality.

  Unfortunately this is not true. When you use default scale to the size of the image the image is set to 100%. Which means that when (zoom) amplify it exceeds 100%, resulting in a loss of quality.

  Select all of the images on the timeline, right-click and press Set to the size of the image.

  It suits them also in the chassis, but according to their original format.

  When you zoom in there is no loss (until you reach 100%).

• Behaviour of the size of the image scale will not turn off

  First 8.0.1 (21) CC 2014 10.9.5 Mac.

  I worked with clips on a corresponding sequence so far. Clips are Full HD.

  Now, I want to change in a smaller sequence (1280 x 720).

  I uncheck scale to the image size option.

  Unfortunately, when I put them in the sequence of small clips they are still scaling to the image size. The movement is 100 and the clip tops out at the frame. I tried several sequences and several clips.

  I have 2 types of sequences (sequences AVCHD and GoPro) that do. My graphics (Lower 3rds and others) are NOT updated with the scale to the size of the image.

  Am I missing something? I use wrong image size scale? Is scale of the image size a property defined on the individual item at time of importation if so, that seems like a terrible idea. I would like the possibility to activate the scale of image size, enable or disable depending on the when I want.

  I just found a way to disable the behavior of scale to the size of frame on individual clips after importation. If you right-click on the item in the timeline panel, you can turn off the scale to frame size.

  This action solved the problem! I can even apply this option to multiple clips at once.