Scale to the size of the image

Similar Questions

• Problem with the scale of the images during the import.

  I took 250 pictures which I've edited in a film in stop motion. However, I encountered some problems.

  The biggest problem is that when I imported the images in the timeline, they were strongly increased and not even centered in the frame. as you can see in this screenshot:

  

  It is a big problem. You would think that I wouldn't have to go through every signle image and resize it down to properly adjust the setting... good? She has not even centered which means that I have to scale and move and be very precise and it's going to take so many hours to do! What is the problem here, how can I do so that when I import images, they are at the right scale?

  problem 2: when I put the images in the scenario that they were 'backwards '. As in, the last image was the first in the chronology and the first image was the last. It's as if the program TRIES to make my life a living hell.

  Daniel, in order to solve your problem, in principle, you should not import your numbered stills in the form of unique images, you must import them as a sequence - tick 'numbered Stills' checkbox in the import and Bob from your uncle - PrPro dialog box will deal with all of these images as a single sequence.

  Go to Edit-> preferences-> Media-> Timebase of media for an indefinite period and desired default rate. In order to change the framerate of already imported image sequence select it in the project Panel, right-click and choose change-> interpret the film...

  Length default for still images is also set through preferences: Edit-> preferences-> General-> still Image default duration. To change the duration of all the stills in your timeline select all, right click, choose speed/duration and set the duration to 1 framework for example. Don't forget to check the Ripple edit, move the creeping Clips .

• Behaviour of the size of the image scale will not turn off

  First 8.0.1 (21) CC 2014 10.9.5 Mac.

  I worked with clips on a corresponding sequence so far. Clips are Full HD.

  Now, I want to change in a smaller sequence (1280 x 720).

  I uncheck scale to the image size option.

  Unfortunately, when I put them in the sequence of small clips they are still scaling to the image size. The movement is 100 and the clip tops out at the frame. I tried several sequences and several clips.

  I have 2 types of sequences (sequences AVCHD and GoPro) that do. My graphics (Lower 3rds and others) are NOT updated with the scale to the size of the image.

  Am I missing something? I use wrong image size scale? Is scale of the image size a property defined on the individual item at time of importation if so, that seems like a terrible idea. I would like the possibility to activate the scale of image size, enable or disable depending on the when I want.

  I just found a way to disable the behavior of scale to the size of frame on individual clips after importation. If you right-click on the item in the timeline panel, you can turn off the scale to frame size.

  This action solved the problem! I can even apply this option to multiple clips at once.

  

• Once I have to zoom on video in post production using the effects Panel and movement controls > scale how can I keep the sharpness of the image?

  How can I keep the sharpness after I Zoom.

  Never exceed 100% scale.  The image is going to deteriorate.

• Restore the size of the image bitmap (image) and PPI

  Here's something that I have not found a quick solution after several years of use.

  The scenario is as follows:

  1. you receive a document with embedded images and no access to links original.

  2. the images are resized and proportions have changed. For example, PPI: 85.372 x 71.954 and the scale of the Image (H, V): 84.337%, 100.065%.

  Is there a quick way to change the scale of the image at 100%, 100% or 72 x 72 PPI?

  I always do this by calculating the percentage of that image has be restored by horizontally and vertically for the original report.

  See you soon.

  Mordy Golding provides this method on his Real World Illustrator blog:

  http://rwillustrator.blogspot.com/2008/11/technique-unembedding-images.html

  It gives a detailed description, but basically it's save as PDF, open in Photoshop, choose the option Images.

  Hope this helps

  Mike D.

• Basic question on the Placement of the Image

  I produce videos that have a lot of images in them, and I often subtly "animate" by using the so-called Ken Burns effect (i.e. the use automated, incremental changes in the scale of the image and/or the position).  I noticed that on occasion, an image that has filled the look at a Panel in Premiere Pro exactly as I wanted show edges or will be his slightly when I look at a version exported video complete when you use QuickTime or another application of visualization.  Are there general rules for placement of Image which will help me to avoid this kind of surprises?

  What you see in your Viewer overview should be what you get export.  If you are not the case, try to remove your Pref Pr or uninstall and reinstall the application.

  BTW, a trick that can be useful for users of Pr CC 2015 is that you can drag the anchor Point by clicking on the icon of the effect of movement in the Panel effects and then drag the anchor cross until you want to zoom in on.  Then you can scale and reposition by animating the scale parameter.

• Pixelation when scaled to "scale to the size of the image?

  Hey all,.

  When I put a clip from 4 k to 'adapt to the size of the image' on a timeline of 1080 p and then it swings a bit, are there any negative pixelation/aliasing occurring as opposed to simply scaling the 4 k clip to the timeline 1080?

  In my view, that it is impossible to discern, but I was wondering if I do something wrong in my workflow.

  Thank you!

  Yes, "Scale to frame size" is destructive. If you open the effect controls panel and look at the scale parameter that you choose this option, you will see that the setting remains at "100" means that your newly reduced film is now 100% and everything above that will cause the loss of resolution.

  What you want is the much better "to the image size" option just below (in the context menu), which will scale your footage to 50%, in order to preserve your goodness in 4 K.

• Default scale to the size of the image in 2015 CC

  Other issues on this subject come from 2012.  I use CC 2015.  I have preferences - default scale of size of frame check box. He has always worked in this project.  I thought that this meant simply that when you cut large images in the timeline, they automatically adjust to the size of the current image of the project. I've done several times before, and I can resize images - zoom - without loss of quality.   All of a sudden when I'm cutting the large images (JPEG, etcl) in the timeline with this project that's making them huge in the Progam monitor.  Am I missing something?

  Thank you

  Patrice

  and I can resize images - zoom - without loss of quality.

  Unfortunately this is not true. When you use default scale to the size of the image the image is set to 100%. Which means that when (zoom) amplify it exceeds 100%, resulting in a loss of quality.

  Select all of the images on the timeline, right-click and press Set to the size of the image.

  It suits them also in the chassis, but according to their original format.

  When you zoom in there is no loss (until you reach 100%).

• Question on the scale to the size of the image.

  So if select scale to the size of the image on 4 k sound clip now 1080... When I Zoom in on this now clip 1080, am I zoom in the film source 4 k or 1080? Also if I uncheck scale to the size of the image the 1080 images back to the 4 k?

  Thanks in adance

  You are zoom in a framework of 1080 100%, which means losing the image quality.

  In other words do not use size framesize but the framesize value, it will keep its original framesize of 4K.

• Question on "Scale to the size of the image by default"

  Hello

  I put my sequence of 1080 p at 25 fps.

  However, my source material are a mixture of 4K video and also extracts of 720 p and also some pictures.

  I noticed that if I uncheck the "Default scale to the size of the image" box, each time, I put the clips imported into the timeline, it's too big and I have to go the effect controls panel to reduce the size. It is very time consuming especially if I have a lot of 4K video clips on the timeline.

  According to me, that if I check the box of 'Default scale to the size of the image', when I put the 4K video on the timeline, it fits very well. My question is when I enlarge him to say the Pan effect, of the resolution will be downgraded compared to when I do not check the "default scale to the size of the image" box?

  Thank you

  If you use the scale to the size of the image, either in manual application or by ticking the "default image size scale" in preferences, your clips will be scaled down (in the case of the 4 K sequence) or upwards (in the case of the sequence of 720 p). In both cases, the clips on the timeline for reference the original source material, so all of the pixel content present in the 4K source, for example, is always available for you to resize.

  You will notice, however, that if you open Motion and see the scale component - it will read 100% because - the clip on the timeline has indeed been reduced to sequence frame size - making it difficult to * how the clip was be reduced or enlarged as the balance indicates the same.

  A better way to edit the clips to the timeline the clip on the timeline, and then select and right click or control click and choose the size of the image, the value and now scale will reflect the percentage reduction or expansion, so you can see how much you can resize until you start to lose resolution.

  Unfortunately, the set to the size of the image is not yet available as a default, you will need to use it manually.

  MtD

• Is footage Epic 5K - there a way by default "scale to the size of the image" horizontally?

  Hey there,

  So basically I have a 2 sequence of k (2048 x 854, 2.40:1 aspect ratio) and I work with 5 k Epic Full Frame footage. With "scale to the size of the image" on, it fits the image from top to bottom, leaving black space on the sides. I know that I can just step up, but it means that I have to disable the subsampling if I want without loss of quality. So what I want, it's so he can mount the frame horizontally and be able to adjust the framing from the top down. Is there any setting I can change to make this happen? Is the part of the RED workflow I'm missing?

  Thanks for reading.

  I agree with Ann, as usual.

  Stay with me on this because I have a workflow that might work for you.

  Don't forget that you can create a sequence using a size of the image that is 2048 wide, but it is large enough to display your picture video when revised downward. If the image full frame are 16:9, it would be 1152.

  Once you have this sequence, you can drop all your clips on it, their balance all by the scaling of one, copy and paste the attributes to all the rest as suggested Ann.

  Now you can simply use this sequence rather than the individual clips, so that your source media. You can chop it to everything in the Source monitor and delete sections of the sequence on the sequence of 2048 X 854. This means that you just have to use the parameters of position up and down sections, and it will be an easier than all the scale when you drop them on the timeline. Or, of course, you can create a sequence of 2038 X 1152 for each of your media clips in place, in order to keep the names right. It is up to you.

  Now, it is probably useful only if a lot of the clips work well without be moved upwards or downwards. If the center of section works well for enough of them, it probably you will save time and trouble.

  However, if you want to enter the path for almost all of them effect anyway, then it might be just as easy to their one size at a time. Although the position can be changed more easily than the scale, click on the query parameter and setting the right position in the program monitor.

  You could put three different copies of a handy clip at the front of the timeline. A cup Center, one at the top and bottom of the frame. You can copy one like that you want when you want.

  Many ways to skin this cat.

• Scale to the size of the image width or height?

  I noticed that this feature puts across clips with the orginal until the width proportions or height responds first the size of the image.

  However, anyway is to dictate who? Say I have a sequence of 720 p and I have a clip of 1270 x 780 for example.

  And I want the width to be filled entirely despite having to cut some of the pixels off blackouts.

  If you want the ability to choose between

  height, width or both in the dialog "scale to the size of the image."

  You can apply here:

  http://www.Adobe.com/go/wish

  If not... create, copy, and paste

  movement of balance is the way to go.

• Will be chip filters scale with the size of the image?

  I created the work to a very large size for a banner. It comes to many of the effects and dynamic filters. I would simply create a smaller version of the file to work with other projects as the original work of the opening size is very long and tax. I don't want to flatten the work because I may need to rearrange the elements of the specific project. When I size down using the size of the Image, with verified scale Styles, dynamic filters always do not fit with the rest of the file. For example, a Gaussian blur will further blur in the smaller file than in the larger file.

  Are my only 1 answers.) to wrap each dynamic object that has a dynamic filter inside another object dynamically to protect during resizing, or 2.) to manually set again the dynamic filter on each layer to match the new size? I'm hoping to more intelligently (ha).

  No, they won't.

  Unfortunately we do not have visibility on the parameters of all filters on the scale of them, nor a means to determine the limits of each filter to know if we can evolve beyond the limits of the filter.

  Yes, 1 and 2 are the most reasonable solutions.

• Scale a layer so that it matches the size of the image. (Automation)

  I need to scale a layer so that it matches the sizeof the image.

  
  The problem is that I need to automate this procedure and apply on a series of images with different resolutions. (That's why I can't use CTRL + T and just drag the corners of the layer to adjust the image)

  The layer I need to resize is 2000 x 1500 pixels.
  The images I need layer to match varies from 3000 x 2000 pixels and 5000 x 4000 pixels. (I know all about loss of quality when I step up please don't give me a lecture this).

  No matter if the layer changes in proportions.

  I use Photoshop CS5.

  If you select the layer you want to resize, you can run the following script to do the resizing...

  var startRulerUnits = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
  var startTypeUnits = app.preferences.typeUnits;
  app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;
  app.preferences.typeUnits = TypeUnits.PIXELS;
  var doc = activeDocument;
  var docWidth = doc.width.value;
  var docHeight = doc.height.value;
  var LB = doc.activeLayer.bounds;
  var LHeight = Math.abs(LB[3].value) - Math.abs(LB[1].value);
  var LWidth = Math.abs(LB[2].value) - Math.abs(LB[0].value);
  var percentageHeight = ((docHeight/LHeight)*100);
  var percentageWidth = ((docWidth/LWidth)*100);
  doc.activeLayer.resize(percentageWidth,percentageHeight,AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);
  align('AdCH');
  align('AdCV');
  app.preferences.typeUnits = startTypeUnits;
  app.preferences.rulerUnits = startRulerUnits;
  function align(method) {
  app.activeDocument.selection.selectAll();
     var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
             var ref = new ActionReference();
             ref.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID( "Lyr " ), charIDToTypeID( "Ordn" ), charIDToTypeID( "Trgt" ) );
         desc.putReference( charIDToTypeID( "null" ), ref );
         desc.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID( "Usng" ), charIDToTypeID( "ADSt" ), charIDToTypeID( method ) );
     executeAction( charIDToTypeID( "Algn" ), desc, DialogModes.NO );
    app.activeDocument.selection.deselect();
  };
  

• How to reduce the size of the font of the images on the screen?

  I don't know how I did it, but the images on my screen are very big and I don't know how to bring them back to normal.
  I understand that it is good for people with visual impairments.

  Try this:

  Right-click on your desktop.
  Choose Customize
  In the left pane of personalization, click on 'font size to adjust it (CIO).
  Click 'Continue' on the control of user Accoount
  On the scale of IPR, check on the option button before 'Default scale (96 DPI) - fit more information'
  Click 'Apply', and then the buttons "OK".